Eng PDF

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 56

Operational framework

for building climate resilient


health systems
LEADERSHIP &
GOVERNANCE
&
TE CING WO HEAL
A RK TH
IM AN FO
CL FIN RC
H E
LT
A
HE

VU
LNE IT Y &
GEM S

C A P AT I O N
AD SSMENT
ENT
P R E PA R N C Y
ES

ASS
APT

RABI
EDN

AC
E

E
EMERG

L I T Y,
& MA N A
C L I M AT E
H E A LT H P

RISK
NG &
NING
M O R AT E D
 I N F MME

E A N I TO R I
ROG

WA R
OR

EG
RA

R LY
ME

INT
D
S

NA
A

VIG
EN

RO EME &
ET
CH

ER N M E N T O F
D

LT H EAR
OF M IN N TA INFR A STRUC TURE,
A
H E E R ES
HE AN L T
AL TS T EC H N O MA
TH LO G IE S A N D CLI
PR ODU
C TS TO ENHANCE
CLIMATE RESILIENCE
WHO Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data
Operational framework for building climate resilient health systems.
I.World Health Organization.

ISBN 978 92 4 156507 3


Subject headings are available from WHO institutional repository

© World Health Organization 2015

All rights reserved. Publications of the World Health Organization are available on the WHO web site (www.who.int) or can be purchased from WHO Press, World
Health Organization, 20 Avenue Appia, 1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland (tel.: +41 22 791 3264; fax: +41 22 791 4857; e-mail: [email protected]).
Requests for permission to reproduce or translate WHO publications –whether for sale or for non-commercial distribution– should be addressed to WHO Press
through the WHO website (www.who.int/about/licensing/copyright_form/en/index.html).
The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the World
Health Organization concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries.
Dotted lines on maps represent approximate border lines for which there may not yet be full agreement.
The mention of specific companies or of certain manufacturers’ products does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended by the World Health Organization in
preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. Errors and omissions excepted, the names of proprietary products are distinguished by initial capital
letters.
All reasonable precautions have been taken by the World Health Organization to verify the information contained in this publication. However, the published material
is being distributed without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. The responsibility for the interpretation and use of the material lies with the reader. In
no event shall the World Health Organization be liable for damages arising from its use.

Cover illustration: Building climate resilience requires strengthening of a range of health system functions, from disease surveillance, to enhanced health action in
emergencies. Health facilities are at the front line. The photograph shows a health clinic in Nepal, which uses solar panels to ensure reliable energy access to provide
essential medical services, including during extreme weather events.
Printed in Geneva, Switzerland.
Operational framework for
building climate resilient
health systems
Acknowledgements
Prepared by Joy Shumake-Guillemot (World Meteorological Organization (WMO)/World Health
Organization (WHO) Joint Office), Elena Villalobos-Prats, Diarmid Campbell-Lendrum (WHO Public
health, environmental and social determinants of health (PHE)).

WHO gratefully acknowledges the financial support provided by the Department for International
Development (DFID), United Kingdom and comments and technical inputs from Guy Howard and
Alexandra Chittenden at DFID.

This framework builds on relevant frameworks and work plans on climate change and health adopted
across WHO regions such as the WHO Regional Office for Africa (AFRO) “Adaptation to climate change
in Africa: Plan of action 2012–2016”; the WHO Regional Office for the Americas (AMRO) “Strategy and
plan of action on climate change”; the WHO Regional Office for Europe (EURO) “Protecting health in an
environment challenged by climate change: European regional framework for action”; the WHO Regional
Office for South-East Asia (SEARO) “Regional strategy for protecting health from climate change”; and
guidance given in resolutions on climate change and health by the WHO Regional Office for the Eastern
Mediterranean (EMRO) and WHO Regional Office for the Western Pacific (WPRO).

It also benefits from the experience gained in country projects funded by Norway, Deutsche Gesellschaft
für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ), the German Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature
Conservation and Nuclear Safety (BMU), Spain through the Millennium Development Goals Fund
(MDG-F), and the Global Environment Facility (GEF).

WHO also wishes to extend its gratitude to the following reviewers within WHO:

Jonathan Abrahams, Magaran Bagayoko, Mariam Otmani del Barrio, Hamed Bakir, Carlos Corvalan,
Nasir Hassan, Rokho Kim, Waltaji Terfa Kutane, Marina Maiero, Bettina Menne, Maria Neira and Jung
Sub Yeom.

Furthermore, WHO acknowledges the insightful comments and contributions provided by the par-
ticipants of the inception meeting of the DFID-funded project on “Building adaptation to climate
change in health in least developed countries through resilient WASH”, held in Geneva, Switzerland
in October 2013, and the final meeting of the GEF/UNDP/WHO Project Managers and International
Project Board for the Global Project “Piloting health adaptation to climate change”, held in Bridgetown,
Barbados in May 2015, who provided insightful inputs for the finalization of the framework. Participants
of the first meeting were: Elias Bartholomew Maiga Chinamo, Semunesh Golla, AM Zakir Hussain,
Iqbal Kabir, Neema Minja Kileo, Waltaji Terfa Kutane, Shamsul Gafur Mahmud, Abadh Kishore Mishra,
Abul Khair Mohammad, Dorisia Mulashani, Sudan Raj Panthi, Badri Pokhrel, Khom Bahadur Subedi
and Dangew Tadesse. Participants of the second meeting were: Tonya Brathwaite, Lester Cumberbatch,
Steve Daniel, Rada Dukpa, Kris Ebi, Sally Edwards, Guto Galvao, Winfred Austin Greaves, Simon Hales,
Joy St. John, Vladimir Kendrovski, Desmond King, Mazen Malkawi, Sonia Nurse, Kepha Ombacho,
MeciuselaTuicakau, Dorji Wangchuk and Nima Wangchuk.
Contents
Acronyms and abbreviations__________________________________________________________ iv
1. Introduction______________________________________________________________________1
2. Background_____________________________________________________________________ 2
2.1 Public health rationale__________________________________________________________ 2
2.2 Policy context__________________________________________________________________5

3. Applying a resilience approach to health systems_______________________________________ 6


3.1 Goal and objectives_____________________________________________________________ 6
3.2 Introducing a resilience approach_________________________________________________ 6
3.3 Applying a resilience approach to health systems______________________________________ 8
3.4 Overarching considerations in building resilience_____________________________________ 9
3.5 Connecting to the “building blocks” of health systems_________________________________ 10
3.6 Ten components for building climate resilience_______________________________________ 12
3.7 How to use the framework_______________________________________________________ 13

Components_______________________________________________________________________14
4.1 Component 1: Leadership and governance___________________________________________ 14
4.2 Component 2: Health workforce__________________________________________________ 16
4.3 Component 3: Vulnerability, capacity and adaptation assessment_________________________ 19
4.4 Component 4: Integrated risk monitoring and early warning____________________________ 21
4.5 Component 5: Health and climate research__________________________________________23
4.6 Component 6: Climate resilient and sustainable technologies and infrastructure_____________25
4.7 Component 7: Management of environmental determinants of health_____________________27
4.8 Component 8: Climate-informed health programmes__________________________________29
4.9 Component 9: Emergency preparedness and management______________________________32
4.10 Component 10: Climate and health financing________________________________________34

5. Monitoring progress_____________________________________________________________ 36
6. Conclusions____________________________________________________________________ 43
Terminology______________________________________________________________________ 44
References________________________________________________________________________ 47
Acronyms and abbreviations
COP Conference of the Parties
DFID Department for International Development
EDRM-H Emergency and Disaster Risk Management for Health
GEF Global Environmental Facility
GFATM Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria
H-NAP health component of NAP
IPCC Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
NAP National Adaptation Plan
UNFCCC United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change
V&A vulnerability and adaptation
WHA World Health Assembly
WHO World Health Organization

iv Operational framework for building climate resilient health systems


1
Introduction
This document presents the World Health Organization (WHO) Operational framework
for building climate resilient health systems. The framework responds to the demand from
Member States and partners for guidance on how the health sector and its operational basis
in health systems can systematically and effectively address the challenges increasingly
presented by climate variability and change. This framework has been designed in light of
the increasing evidence of climate change and its associated health risks (1); global, regional
and national policy mandates to protect population health (2); and a rapidly emerging body
of practical experience in building health resilience to climate change (3).

Primarily intended for public health professionals and health managers, this framework
would also help guide decision-makers in other health-determining sectors, such as
nutrition, water and sanitation, and emergency management. International development
agencies could use this framework to focus investments and country support for public
health, health system strengthening and climate change adaptation.

The objective of this framework is to provide guidance for health systems and public health
programming to increase their capacity for protecting health in an unstable and changing
climate. By implementing the 10 key components laid out in this framework, health
organizations, authorities and programmes will be better able to anticipate, prevent, prepare
for and manage climate-related health risks. Least developed countries and countries in the
process of developing the health components of National Adaptation Plans (NAPs) under
the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) (4) may find this document
particularly useful in their efforts to design a comprehensive response to the risks presented
by short-term climate variability and long-term climate change.

Introduction 1
2
Background
2.1 Public health rationale
There is clear evidence that human actions, principally the burning of fossil fuels and
associated release of climate pollutants, are causing significant changes in global climate.
This in turn is creating observed consequences in environmental and social conditions
across all continents (5). As many of the largest health concerns are strongly influenced by
weather and climate conditions, this inevitably presents risks for human health that can be
grouped into:

• Direct impacts, such as those arising from damages and illness due to increased frequency
and severity of extreme weather events.
• Environmental system mediated impacts, such as rising air pollution and changing
patterns of vector-, food- and water-borne diseases.
• Socially mediated effects that occur via effect of climate change on social and human
systems, such as health effects resulting from undernutrition, occupational heat stress
and mental illness, as well as potential increases in population displacement, slowing of
economic growth and poverty aggravation.

Table 1 shows some of the main climate-related health risks, that have been assessed as
having medium-to-strong evidence by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
(IPCC). In addition, the IPCC identifies a series of key reasons for concern with regard
to effects of climate change which are either particularly severe or irreversible (5). This
includes the potential: (i) increase in severity and frequency of extreme weather events, such
as storms and floods causing mass displacement and disruption of livelihoods in low-lying
coastal zones and small island states due to storm surges and rise in sea level; (ii) breakdown
of food systems resulting in food shortages and volatile prices, particularly in low- and
middle-income countries; (iii) potential increase in risk of violent conflict associated with
resource scarcity and population movements; and (iv) slowing down of economic growth
and exacerbation of poverty, with associated reversal of global health progress, achievement
of the Millennium Development Goals, and the objectives of the forthcoming post-2015
development agenda.

Overall, climate change is expected to significantly increase health risks, particularly in


low- and middle-income countries and populations. They will also disproportionately affect
vulnerable groups within each country, including the poor, children, the elderly and those
with pre-existing medical conditions.

Despite these challenges, a lot can be done to protect deterioration of health due to climatic
conditions. Over the long term, mitigation is necessary to avoid continued degradation of
the environmental determinants of health. In the short-to-medium term (i.e. up to the next
20–30 years) well-planned adaptation measures can avoid much of the projected health
impacts.

2 Operational framework for building climate resilient health systems


table 1: Summary of the main expected health impacts of climate variability and climate change globally
by the middle of the current century

  Climate change Health risks Health impacts Confidence


effects rating
Direct Increased number Excess heat-related mortality; increased Increased risk of Very high
effects of warm days and incidence of heat exhaustion and heat stroke, injury, disease
nights; increased particularly for outdoor labourers, athletes, the and death due to
 
frequency and elderly; exacerbated circulatory, cardiovascular, more intense heat
intensity of heat respiratory and kidney diseases; increased waves and fires
waves; increased fire premature mortality related to ozone and air
risk in low rainfall pollution produced by fires, particularly during
conditions heat waves
Decreased number Lower cold-related mortality and reduced Modest Low
of cold days and cardiovascular and respiratory diseases improvements
nights particularly for the elderly in cold and in cold-related
temperate climates mortality and
morbidity
Effects Higher temperatures Accelerated microbial growth, survival, Increased risks of Very high
mediated and humidity; persistence, transmission, virulence of food- and water-
through changing and pathogens; shifting geographic and seasonal borne diseases
natural increasingly variable distribution of diseases (e.g. cholera,
systems precipitation; schistosomiasis) and ecological changes (e.g.
higher sea surface harmful algal blooms); lack of water leading
 
and freshwater to poor hygiene; flood damage to water and
temperatures sanitation infrastructures; contamination of
water sources through overflow
Higher temperatures Accelerated parasite replication and increased Increased risks Medium
and humidity; biting rates; prolonged transmission seasons; of vector-borne
changing and re-emergence of formerly prevalent diseases; diseases
increasingly variable changing distribution and abundance of
precipitation disease vectors; reduced effectiveness of vector
control interventions
Effects Higher temperatures Lower food production in the tropics; lower Increased risk High
heavily and changes in access to food due to reduced supply of undernutrition
mediated precipitation and higher prices; combined effects of resulting from
by human undernutrition and infectious diseases; chronic diminished food
systems effects of stunting and wasting in children production in poor
regions
 
Higher temperatures Outdoor and unprotected workers obliged to Consequences on High
and humidity work either in physiologically unsafe conditions workers’ health
or to lose income and livelihood opportunities include lost work
capacity and
reduced labour
productivity
in vulnerable
populations
Combined Overall climate Combination of above risks Negative health High
effect change effects would
outweigh positive
effects worldwide

Note: The final column refers to the level of confidence in the evidence for expected health impacts, as presented in the Fifth assessment
report of the IPCC (1). Other health impacts are possible (see text), but were not assigned evidence grading by the IPCC.

Background 3
Figure 1 provides a qualitative assessment of the future burden (for the period 2030–2040)
of ill-health due to current climate change, in which the world will inevitably experience
approximately 1.5 °C of warming due to past and present greenhouse gas emissions (1,5).
Figure 1 also presents the period 2080–2100, for which the global mean temperature is
expected to increase by approximately 4 °C above preindustrial levels, unless vigorous
mitigation efforts are undertaken soon (1,5). The different colours indicate the extent to
which disease burdens could be avoided by effective adaptation measures in each period.

Figure 1: Conceptual presentation of health risks due to climate change and the potential for risk
reduction through adaptation

Present
Undernutrition

Vector-borne
diseases
Heat 2030–2040
"Era of committed climate change"
+ 1.5°C Undernutrition

Occupational
Food- and health
water-borne Vector-borne
infections diseases
Mental health Heat
and violence
Extreme
weather
Air quality events

Occupational
Food- and
2080–2100 water-borne
health
"Era of climate options" infections
Mental health
+ 4°C Undernutrition and violence
Extreme
weather
Air quality events
Vector-borne
diseases
Heat

Risk and potential for adaptation

Occupational
Food- and health Risk level with
water-borne current adaptation
infections
Potential for
Mental health adaptation to
and violence
Risk level with reduce risk
Extreme high adaptation
weather
Air quality events

Note: The width of the slices gives a qualitative indication of the relative burden of ill health at the global level. For
each timeframe, impact levels are estimated for the current state of adaptation and for a hypothetical highly adapted
state, indicated by different colours.
Source: Reproduced from the health chapter, Working group II of the IPCC Fifth assessment report (1).

4 Operational framework for building climate resilient health systems


This operational framework can be used by all health systems, but is particularly oriented
to support those in low- and middle-income countries, which often already face challenges
to adequately prepare for health emergencies and control disease burdens, provide coverage
of basic healthcare and public health services, manage inequity, and use resources in a cost-
effective way. Health systems with such challenges are at particularly high risk for future
setbacks and losses in health achievements gained. And, in these locations building of
resilience would need to start with reducing existing health system vulnerabilities.

2.2 Policy context


The operational framework responds to policy mandates at global, regional and
(increasingly at) national levels. It includes the World Health Assembly (WHA) and WHO
regional committee resolutions on health protection from climate change, strengthening
national health emergency and disaster management capacities for managing the risks of
meteorological and other extreme events, health system strengthening and implementation
of International Health Regulations (2,7). It also responds to the requests by parties to the
UNFCCC regarding provision of support in planning adaptation to climate change in key
sectors, including health. Additionally, it responds to the post-2015 development agenda
and associated Sustainable Development Goals and the Sendai framework for disaster risk
reduction.

This document therefore aims to support national ministries of health and their partners to
identify the key functions that need to be strengthened in order to provide a comprehensive
public health response to climate change, within an overall intersectoral NAP (4).

Background 5
3
Applying a resilience
approach to health systems
3.1 Goal and objectives
Framework goal
The goal is to enhance the capacity of health systems to protect and improve population
health in an unstable and changing climate. Ultimately, health systems should be
increasingly strengthened and continue to be efficient and responsive to improve health,
reduce inequities and vulnerability, and provide adequate social and financial protection,
in light of the shocks and stresses they may face from climate variability and change. The
framework therefore aims to achieve its goal through activities that build capacity to
effectively monitor, anticipate, manage and adapt to the health risks associated with climate
variability and change.

Framework objectives
Specifically, this framework aims to:

• guide professionals working in health systems, and in health determining sectors (e.g.
water and sanitation, food and agriculture, energy, urban planning) to understand and
effectively prepare for the additional health risks posed by climate variability and change,
through a resilience approach;
• identify the main health functions that need to be strengthened to build up climate
resilience, and use these as the basis for developing a comprehensive and practical plan
(e.g. as the health component of NAP (H-NAP)) (4); and
• support health decision-makers to identify roles and responsibilities to implement this
plan, for actors both within and outside the formal health sector.

3.2 Introducing a resilience approach


What is resilience?

IPCC defines ‘resilience’ as the “capacity of a social-ecological system to cope with a hazardous
event or disturbance, responding or reorganizing in ways that maintain its essential function,
identity, and structure, while also maintaining the capacity for adaptation, learning and
transformation.” (6)

6 Operational framework for building climate resilient health systems


In the simplest terms, resilience refers to the holistic ability and agility of a system to change
and flex – according to circumstances – and continue to function under stress, while
undergoing change. Resilience is much more than just the absence of vulnerability; it is
about whole system capacity.

Adaptations to climate change and climate resilience building are closely related, but not
synonymous. ‘Adaptation’, as defined by the IPCC in its Fifth assessment report, is the “process
of adjustment to actual or expected climate and its effects. In human systems, adaptation seeks
to moderate harm or exploit beneficial opportunities. In natural systems, human intervention
may facilitate adjustment to expected climate and its effects” (6).

With regard to health, resilience relates to the capacity of the system itself to cope with
and manage health risks in a way that the essential functions, identity and structure of
health systems are maintained. While health adaptation seeks to moderate harm or exploit
beneficial opportunities, the preservation of a certain level of quality and sustainable
performance of the system itself is not ensured. The incorporation of a climate-resilient
approach to health systems contributes to assuring the performance of the system, and
therefore, the sustainability and maximization of value for money of health investments.
However, it is important to remember that maintaining system resilience may not always
be possible. The magnitude of climate-induced changes or shocks may be so significant that
it is outside human abilities to maintain its essential functions, and thus the system may
collapse or fail.

Figure 2 shows the conceptual framework of a resilient system, which can be applied to
communities, organizations, or other systems, including health systems.

Figure 2: Conceptual framework for resilience

1 2 3 4 5
CONTEXT CHALLENGE/ CAPACITY TO DEAL CHOICES & OUTCOME
DISTURBANCE WITH DISTURBANCE OPPORTUNITIES OPTIONS

Shock Vulnerability Transform

Exposure Recover better


than before
Health Recover to
Sensitivity pre-event state
System Stresses Recover but worse
than before
Adaptive
capacity Collapse

Resilience =
Decreased + Increased capacity.
vulnerability Improved choices &
opportunities

Source: Adapted from Defining disaster resilience: a DFID approach paper (8).

Applying a resilience approach to health systems 7

Created by Seán Mongey


from the Noun Project
The degree of resilience a system possesses largely manifests in step 4 (choices and
opportunities; see Figure 2). Low levels of resilience may result in the system collapsing
(health operations cease) or experiencing setbacks (limited health service delivery capacity
due to stock losses or staff shortages) that put them in a worse position than before the
adverse events.

3.3 Applying a resilience approach to health systems


Building health system resilience to climate change is a cumulative process. It begins with
making resilience a goal, in addition to current goals of improving population health, being
responsive and efficient and providing social and financial protection.

This entails building capacity to: recognize, monitor, anticipate, communicate and prepare
for changing climate-related health risks; prevent, respond to, manage, and cope with
uncertainty, adversity and stress; adapt operations to changing risk conditions; recover from
crisis and setbacks with minimal outside support; and learn from experience and improve
system capacity for the future.

WHO working definition of a climate resilient health system


A climate resilient health system is one that is capable to anticipate, respond to, cope with, recover
from and adapt to climate-related shocks and stress, so as to bring sustained improvements in
population health, despite an unstable climate.

For the whole health system to become more climate-resilient, its independent building
blocks (i.e. leadership and governance, health workforce, health information systems,
essential medical products and technologies, service delivery and financing) have to also
become climate resilient.

Furthermore, in order to effectively protect the health of the population, the health sector
should strengthen and extend its sphere of influence and operations beyond itself mainly in
relation to health-determining sectors (e.g. water, energy, food and agriculture and urban
planning). While it is clear that the management of these sectors is not directly under the
control of the health sector, the development of normative guidance to determine acceptable
levels of exposure to risks for health (e.g. water and air quality guidelines) is a core health
role. In the same way, the role of monitoring health outcomes in relation to the operations
of these sectors is usually the responsibility of the health sector.

Ultimately, the health sector should effectively extend into the community level if the health
system is to protect health and facilitate community resilience. Local level dialogue, two-
way information exchange, and community mobilization should be considered essential
functions of the health system. Community empowerment can activate local capacity,
increase the scope of available information, improve understanding of vulnerability and
build foundations for local resilience.

8 Operational framework for building climate resilient health systems


3.4 Overarching considerations in building resilience
Building climate resilience is a process of teaching the health system to more effectively
adapt to change, particularly changing health risks due to climate change. The process of
building resilience occurs in two principle ways: (i) reducing overall vulnerability, and (ii)
developing specific system capacities. Incorporating these considerations when applying
the operational framework is important to integrating climate perspectives to health policy
and operations.

Reduce vulnerability
A healthier population and stronger health system will be more resilient to climate change.
In order to reduce vulnerability and create resilient health systems and healthier populations
that are able to respond to potential health effects from climate change, the following
measures are recommended:

• Continued investments to reduce poverty and inequity.


• Universal access to essential services, such as health, education, clean water and adequate
food.

For health system strengthening the following measures are recommended:

• An adequate workforce and climate-proofed infrastructure in local facilities to control


climate-sensitive diseases and improve response to local emergencies.
• Surveillance systems to monitor population health and environmental exposure.
• Good practices of health governance.

Develop capacities
Addressing current gaps and improving the current health system or programme
performance is not enough to prepare a health system to tackle climate change. Health
systems should increasingly take steps to understand how climate change will affect their
population and service delivery, evaluate the effectiveness of their interventions and systems
under diverse climatic conditions, and enhance their institutional capacity accordingly. To
do this, public health and health system capacities that are attuned to climate realities are
needed.

Add long-term perspectives for actions to be put in place today


Climate related health risks occur at multiple timescales, from short-term climate variability
(such as heat waves and storms that can trigger health emergencies over timescales from days
to weeks), to long-term climate change (such as timing of the onset of seasons and average
number of hot days and nights over decades). The implementation of each component
should therefore consider decisions with the aim to improve service delivery and health
system performance in the short- (days to years), medium- (5–10 years) as well as long-term
(decades) perspectives.

Applying a resilience approach to health systems 9


Ensure adaptive management
Features of Adaptive Management
approaches exist
• Risk-informed
Adaptive management is a structured and • Iterative processes
iterative  process of  decision-making and
• Flexible
implementation that is especially useful  in
• Information seeking for learning
the context of uncertainty. Adaptive
• Nonlinear
management processes and approaches
use active learning methods to help accrue • Uses models and scenarios to
multiple perspectives of information that understand future context
can reduce uncertainty over time and • Embraces risk and uncertainty as a way
adjust the system according to changes to increase learning
(9). In general, using tools and approaches
that seek and apply feedback and new information to decision-making facilitates adaptive
management. For example, risk assessments clarify the scale of local needs; clients, staff and
partners surveys provide insights on effectiveness; monitoring identifies stepwise changes in
conditions; scenario-planning of project performance and failure under diverse conditions
identifies limitations; and pilot projects or pretesting helps improve project or process design
before scaling up. Each of these processes or tools provides ways of introducing phased
implementation and allowing for adjustments and modifications to be made based on
early lessons and available information. This framework encourages adaptive management
approaches and processes.

Ensure community approaches and voices to strengthen health action


Community action is critical to achieve climate-resilience relevant to each of the 10
components listed below. The health impacts of climate change on individuals and
communities are determined at the local level by changes in local conditions and health
behaviours from available information. Thus partnerships of government, academic
institutions and civil society with communities are key to understanding the nature of
local risks and vulnerability, and to developing appropriate solutions to protect health.
Communities can play important roles in improving the quality of assessments, risk
monitoring, communications, capacity building and programming. Community-based
action is a principal mechanism for ensuring that people themselves are informed, educated
and able to take appropriate action to protect and maintain their individual and families’
health. Resilience can be strategically built through good development policy and practices
that take climate change into consideration and empower communities.

3.5 Connecting to the “building blocks” of health systems


Health systems vary around the world, but all share some common features in their ultimate
goals and general functions. WHO has identified six common “building blocks” (10) that
are necessary to support the delivery of Universal Health Coverage and improved outcomes
(Figure 3). To ensure that climate resilience builds on and strengthens existing health
systems, these building blocks are taken as a starting point for the expansion of primary
components that specifically enhance climate resilience.

10 Operational framework for building climate resilient health systems


1. Leadership and governance. In addition to the core functions of ensuring good
governance, evidence-informed policy and accountability within the traditional health
system itself, the climate resilience approach requires leadership and strategic planning
to address the complex and long-term nature of climate change risks. It particularly calls
for collaboration to develop a shared vision among diverse stakeholders, and coordinated
cross-sectoral planning to ensure that policies are coherent and health promoting,
particularly in sectors that have a strong influence on health, such as water and sanitation,
nutrition, energy and urban planning.
2. Health workforce. Overall, health system functioning relies on a sufficient number of
trained and resourceful staff, working within an organizational structure that allows
the health system to effectively identify, prevent and manage health risks. Building
climate resilience requires additional professional training in linking climate change to
health, and an investment in the organizational capacity to work flexibly and effectively
in response to other conditions affected by climate change. It also requires raising the
awareness of links between climate and health with key audiences (including but not
limited to health policy makers, senior staff, the media), and in particular empowering
affected communities to take ownership of their own response to new health challenges.
3. Health information systems. This building block focuses particularly on health
information systems, including disease surveillance, as well as the research that is
required to continue to make health-related progress against persistent and emerging
threats. In the context of climate change, there is a specific need for: (i) information
on vulnerability to climate risks, existing and expected future capacity of the system
to respond, and identification of adaptations; (ii) integration of climate information
into disease surveillance, providing an opportunity to develop early warning systems
and more accurate target interventions; and (iii) guidance and utilization of the rapidly
emerging body of research on health and climate change.
4. Essential medical products and technologies. This traditionally aims to ensure
provision of proven, safe and cost-effective healthcare interventions. The challenge of
climate change requires a wider perspective, which includes the selection of more climate-
resilient intervention options both within the healthcare and in health-determining
sectors, from renewable energy in health facilities to climate resilient water and sanitation
infrastructure. It requires attention to utilization of innovative technologies (such as
remote sensing for disease surveillance) and involves reducing the environmental impact
of healthcare as a means to long-term sustainability.
5. Service delivery. Building and expanding traditional systems of healthcare delivery to
enhance climate resilience includes attention to: (i) the integration of climate change
considerations, particularly the use of meteorological information, into existing
programmes for control of climate-sensitive diseases (e.g. vector-borne diseases); (ii)
improved management of the environmental determinants of health, such as water
and sanitation, nutrition and air quality, taking into account the modifying effect of
socioeconomic conditions; and (iii) disaster risk reduction, emergency preparedness and
management, in relation to the health consequences of extreme weather events, such as
heat waves, floods and droughts.
6. Financing. In addition to meeting the existing large demand of financing curative
interventions within healthcare systems, there is a need to consider a potential increase

Applying a resilience approach to health systems 11


in healthcare costs due to climate-sensitive diseases, and develop new models to finance
preventive intersectoral approaches. This can include leveraging climate change specific
funding streams.

3.6 Ten components for building climate resilience


In order to provide a comprehensive health response to climate change, health decision
makers need to consider the full range of functions that need to be strengthened to increase
climate resilience.

Starting from health sector building blocks, and taking into account existing global and
regional mandates, the operational framework elaborates on 10 components that together
provide a comprehensive approach to integrating climate resilience into existing health
systems. These can provide the structure for a health adaptation plan, including the
allocation of roles and responsibilities, as well as human and financial resources.

Figure 3: Ten components comprising the WHO operational framework for building
climate resilient health systems, and the main connections to the building blocks of
10 components to build climate resilient health systems
health systems

A TE RESILIEN
I M CE
CL LEADERSHIP &
GOVERNANCE
&
ATE NCING WO HEAL
IM A RK TH
CL FIN FO
RC
H
LT Leadership & E
A

governance
HE

Health
VU

Financing
workforce
GEM SS

LNE IT Y &
T
P R E PA R N C Y

C A P AT I O N
AD ESSMENT
EN

ASS
E
EDN

APT

RABI
AC
E
EMERG

ing bloc
ild
& MA N A

L I T Y,
Bu

ks

Health
C L I M AT E
H E A LT H

s
of

E A N I TO R I R I S K

Service information
em

ea
WA R G &

delivery
lt h s y s t
NING

systems
h

MO R AT E D
N
PRO
 I N F MME

EG
GRA
OR

R LY
INT
ME S

Essential
medical
D

M N

N products &
A

V I AG E
E

R technologies
ET O N M E N & R
CH

H
D

E M T LT SEA
O F RM IN E N TA O F C L I M AT E R E S IL I E N T
A
H E E RE
HE AN L T
AL TS MA
TH & S U S TAI N A B L E CLI
TECHNOLOGIES
A N D INF
R ASTRUC TURE

12 Operational framework for building climate resilient health systems


3.7 How to use the framework
The framework components should be used to mainstream climate change into sector-
wide or vertical programmes, as well as guide the holistic design of NAPs. Each component
plays an important role in strengthening system capacity to address climate change. As a
systemic approach, there are strong connections between the various components that serve
to reinforce one another. A sound climate adaptation plan will therefore include many, if not
all, of the 10 components.

Health systems vary, as do the scale and nature of the challenges with which they are faced.
Therefore, the framework is not to be used as a definitive and rigid structure, but as a flexible
approach that should be adapted to the national and local context.

The following sections provide a description of the main issues to consider under each
component, along with proposed objectives and examples of measurable outputs to enhance
climate resilience.

Applying a resilience approach to health systems 13


4
Components

4.1 COMPONENT 1: Leadership and governance


This component refers to the strategic consideration and
CLIMATE & HEA
management of the scope and magnitude of climate related stress
Y FINANCIN LTH
ENC S S G LE
ERG DNE T GO ADE
EM PAREGEMEN VE R
E A
and shocks to health systems now and in the future, and their
P R AN R
S H AN C

M
N
IP E

&
ED
PROGHEALT FORM

&

incorporation into strategic health policy, both within the formal


S
ME
R AM H
N
TEI

health system and in health-determining sectors.


C L I MA

WOR
HEALTH
KFORCE
MANIRONMENTAL
AGEMEN F
N T E N E T E R M I N A N TS
TO

LTH

Within the formal health sector, political leadership and the will
S IL L E & D O F HE A

ASSE PTATT Y & Y,

to address the health risks of climate change are essential to ensure


ADA PACI ILIT
VULN
C A ER AB
V

S S M I ON
RE INAB IES RE

implementation across the full range of programmes for climate-


U

EN
LO UCT

T
G
R
E

ST
I

RA O EA
INF CHN STA
TE & SU ATE
M RL
IN ON Y WA
TE ITO RNIN sensitive health risks. This includes ensuring collaboration between
IM R ESEAR CH GR RIN G

all relevant health divisions, such as environmental health; vector


CL ATE G &
CLIMATE D RI
SK
HEALTH &

control; water, sanitation and hygiene; disaster management; health


information systems; policy; and finance.
Political commitment and
effective leadership to build At the same time, an effective response to climate change implies
climate resilience assessment, monitoring, regulation and management of climate-
related health risks that originate in other sectors. These sectors
• Policy prioritization and planning to
include agriculture and food; water; waste; energy; transport;
address climate risks
labour and industry; land planning; housing and infrastructure;
• Inclusive policies encouraging high
and disaster management. At the national level, these sectors in
degree of social and economic equity
most countries have active programmes to respond to the impacts
• Legal and regulatory systems which of climate change. With adequate coordination, investments in
protect health and emergency these sectors can be leveraged to also maximize health protection.
policies and planning
• Institutional mechanisms, capacities Accountability is an integral part of health governance. This
and structures, and allocation of therefore also requires engagement with, and accountability to, the
responsibilities to address climate wider community that are affected by the decisions taken on their
• Partnerships behalf.
• Accountability and community
participation. Objectives for the implementation of this component
Governance: specific responsibility and accountability mechanisms
on climate change and health established within the health ministry.

Policy: climate variability and change considerations reflected in main health policies and
programmes.

14 Operational framework for building climate resilient health systems


Cross-sectoral collaboration: cross-sectoral collaboration strengthened and synergies
maximized to ensure that decisions taken in other sectors protect and promote health.

Examples of measurable outputs

Governance
• Climate change and health focal points designated within the health ministry with
specific programme of action and budget allocated.
• Climate change and health focal points or units, working in collaboration with relevant
climate-sensitive health programmes (e.g. vector-borne diseases, nutrition, infectious
diseases, disaster risk reduction) to build resilience of programmes.

Policy
• National strategy on health and climate change and/or H-NAP developed.

Cross-sectoral collaboration
• Agreements (e.g. Memoranda of Understanding) established between the health ministry
and main stakeholders at the national level (e.g. meteorological services, ministries of
environment, food and agriculture, energy, transport, planning), include specific roles
and responsibilities in relation to protecting health from climate change.
• Health representation ensured in main climate change processes at national, regional
and global levels (e.g. UNFCCC meetings and Conference of the Parties (COP), NAP,
national communications to the UNFCCC).
• Main policies and strategies from health-determining sectors reflect climate change and
health considerations both in relation to adaptation (e.g. climate-resilient water safety
plans) and mitigation (e.g. health cobenefits in transport policies).
• Health impact assessments conducted for new mitigation and adaptation policies and
programmes in all health-determining sectors, in accordance with article 4.1.f of the
UNFCCC.

Components 15
4.2 COMPONENT 2: Health workforce
This component refers to strengthening of technical and professional
BILIT Y, I NT EGR
N ER A
VUL APACIT YO&N
C PTATI
MON ATED
EARLY ITORIN RISK
WAR G &
capacity of health personnel, the organizational capacity of health
ADASESSMENT NI N
CE AS G
systems, and their institutional capacity to work with others.
FO H
RK LT
R
WO H E A

H E L I MA R C H
C SEA
AL TE
RE

TH
&
Development of capacities specifically for climate change and
LEADERSHIP &
GOVE RN AN CE

health should build upon and support the more general effort to
CLIMATE RESILIENT
TECHNOLOGIES & ENV AGE
INFRASTRUCTURE DET IRON ME
& SUSTAINABLE ensure adequate baseline levels of health competencies in health
policy and management, research and analysis, healthcare and
TH
&H G
EAL

OF E R M ME N
TE NCIN

public health service delivery.


MA
HE I N

N
AL
A

A TH
IM I N
F

N T N TS
A

T O AL T
CL PRO EN
F GE M S S
A health system relies upon an effective health workforce to achieve
G
CLI HEARAMMES & MANAREDNE Y
MA LT H PR E PA N C
TE IN GE
FORMED E ME R

the best health outcomes possible, given available resources and


circumstances. Climate variability and change may increase local
Guiding principles for capacity demand for services, thus potentially altering the number of health
building on climate change workers and staff required, the type of health workers, as well as
and health their level of training.

• Build on existing efforts, standards Technical and professional capacity of health staff can be developed
and best practices undertaken at all through training, education, mentoring as well as experiential trial
levels and error to: understand and use climate information for health
• Focus on actors’ needs. In order decision-making, engage in cross-sectoral monitoring, conduct
to ensure the implementation of research and interventions, and effectively manage changing risks
accurate interventions, any initiative to health and health system performance. In addition, a range of
on capacity development at any competencies would become increasingly important, such as the
level should start by a capacity ability to effectively work and communicate across disciplines,
assessment of the corresponding analytical skills to interpret and use nonhealth information for
health system decision-making, and the ability to communicate climate risks to
• Foster collaboration and health actors and the public.
partnerships, especially with and
between countries and regions, Organizational capacity refers to the availability of sufficient
and within and between related financial and human resources to cope with the health threats
departments and units of climate change. This includes the efficient and targeted use
• Enhance the sustainability of of resources, information, knowledge and processes employed
capacity building efforts by by the organization (such as resource mobilization and income
integrating climate change at early generation, human resources and staffing, programme and process
stages of professional health training management), which enhance the resilience and adaptive capacity
of a health system to address risks associated with climate change.
• Engage with wider audiences outside
of the core health community,
It is also strategically important to develop institutional capacity,
including other sectors, the media
including the ability of health systems to partner with other
and community groups.
actors. This involves the ability to define and fulfil responsibilities
in collaboration with other sectors, and communicate with the
public, including through the media. It is therefore important to build awareness and
media capacity to effectively and responsibly communicate climate risks and associated

16 Operational framework for building climate resilient health systems


uncertainty, as well as identify how to best disseminate appropriate and constructive public
service announcements.

Communities need to be aware of the challenges around them, involved in risk identification
and decision-making, and empowered to effectively protect themselves. Community groups
and leaders need to be prepared for local risks, know what role they play in prevention
and response, and be aware of potential effective solutions and resources available to them.
Communities also often have rich local information about risks, community capacity and
vulnerability that can help to guide the formulation of responses. Outreach, partnerships,
stakeholder engagement, and effective two-way dialogue are vital to improving how the
health system works with the community.

Other sectors need to be aware of the scope and scale of health risks that originate within
their sectors; and the need for effective dialogue to enable effective collaborative planning,
policy and implementation of actions with cobenefits to health.

Objectives for the implementation of this component


Human resources: sufficient number of health workers with the required technical capacity
available to deal with the health risks posed by climate variability and change.

Organizational capacity development: resources, information, knowledge and processes


employed by health organizations used in an efficient and targeted manner in the face of
additional risks posed by climate variability and change.

Communications and awareness raising: raise awareness of the link between climate
variability/climate change and health outcomes among different target audiences (e.g. policy
makers, senior staff, media and communities).

Examples of measurable outputs

Human resource skill building, training and education


• Training courses on climate change and health topics targeting health personnel
conducted.
• Curricula on climate change and health developed and imparted at secondary and/or
tertiary levels.

Organizational capacity development


• Contingency plans for the deployment of sufficient health personnel in case of acute
shocks, such as extreme weather events and outbreaks developed at the relevant level (i.e.
national, provincial, local).
• Realistic and innovative capacity-building plans (e.g. from capacity or vulnerability
and adaptation assessments) developed to address identified human resources and
institutional capacity gaps.

Components 17
• Contingencies, adaptation costs and potential losses and damages from climate change
incorporated by management staff into investment plans.

Communications and awareness raising


• Development and implementation of internal and external communication plans
(including the development of knowledge products) to raise awareness of health and
climate change, and response options targeting key audiences, such as health professionals
and decision-makers, communities, the media and other sectors.
• Health professionals, the media and community leaders trained in risk communication,
including communication of uncertainty.
• Stakeholder forum on protecting health from climate change established as a way to
engage health-determining sectors and the community.

18 Operational framework for building climate resilient health systems


4.3 COMPONENT 3: Vulnerability, capacity and
adaptation assessment HIP
&
HEALTH
WORK FORC VU
ERS NCE E L
AD N A C NE
LE VER AD APA R
GO AS AP
This component includes the range of assessments that can be used to

AB T Y & N
SE T

CI ATIOENT
S

IL I
I NG T H

TY
NC EAL

SM
generate policy-relevant evidence on the scale and nature of health

,
FI NA E & H
AT

INTE NITORING &


risks, and the most vulnerable populations, taking into account the

EAR
MO LY WARNING
CLIM

GRATED
local circumstances.

PREAPNAGEMENT
EMERREDNESS

RISK
GENC Y
A
Health risks vary depending on the nature of the exposure (e.g. if the

RESEIMAT &
M

CL LTH
HE A
&

AR E
location of a population makes it prone to drought or to flooding),

CH
NF TH ES
D

L MM
ME
IN
TE FRA

A
OR
R
the projected changes in climatic conditions and associated hazards
CH ST OG A
CL & SU NOLRUCTUR P R HE E  I
IM STA OGIE E OF HEALTH TS AT
AT INA S & DETERMINAN L M
ER CL I
(e.g. projected change in precipitation patterns or climate suitability
ES IL BL E ENTA
IENT ENVIRONMENT OF
MANAGEM

for infectious disease transmission), socioeconomic and environmental


determinants at the population and individual level (e.g. age,
gender, coverage of water, sanitation and hygiene systems), and Steps of vulnerability and
the capacity of health systems to protect from current and future adaptation (V&A) assessments
risks (e.g. the effectiveness of disease surveillance systems and the • Assess frame and scope
degree to which they are flexible to sudden shocks or to gradually
• Establish baseline conditions
changing patterns of disease risk). Similarly, the scope of available
• Assess the potential health impacts
adaptation options will depend on the governance and institutional
of future climate change
arrangements within the country, and the availability of human and
• Identify adaptation options
financial resources, among other factors.
• Assess resources
Climate vulnerability and adaptation (V&A) assessments are an • Ensure synergies and optimize trade-
essential tool for health policy and programmatic planning (11). offs with other objectives
Their objective is to assess which populations are most vulnerable • Establish an iterative process for
to different kinds of health effects, to identify weaknesses in the monitoring changes in health risks
systems that should protect them, and to specify interventions to associated with climate change, and
respond. Assessments can also improve evidence and understanding review adaptation options.
of the linkages between climate and health, serve as a baseline
analysis against which changes in disease risk and protective measures can be monitored,
identify knowledge gaps, provide the opportunity for building capacity, and strengthen the
case for investment in health protection. V&A assessments are not one-time studies, but
iterative processes that involve phased investigation, periodic review, additional studies and
assessments to update with new information, and active stakeholder communication.

Successful V&A assessment processes will often include inputs from academic experts, to
ensure high quality evidence, as well as managerial and operational personnel to ensure
relevance to policy and practice. The studies will examine health risks, such as heat stress,
nutrition and vector-borne diseases separately, and consider how they interact with each
other and with changes in other determinants, such as ageing and urbanization. Assessment
teams will consider opportunities and constraints for responses throughout the causal
pathway, from managing environmental health determinants, to disease surveillance, to
control and treatment of specific diseases. Critically, the process will involve a range of
stakeholders and use information from a variety of sources, including health and nonhealth
scientific information, as well as community knowledge and feedback.

Components 19
Throughout the V&A assessment process a range of additional studies, analytical exercises
and tools may be used to gain a more holistic perspective of health vulnerability to climate.
These include:

• Vulnerability and risk mapping


• Modelling
• Scenario development
• Health system capacity and performance assessments
• Economic assessments
• Health impact assessments of decisions in other sectors
• Specific risk, events and hazard assessments.

Objectives for the implementation of this component


Vulnerability: a sound understanding of the main health risks posed by climate vulnerability
and change, and of the most vulnerable population groups available in the country or region.

Capacity: baseline information on capacities and gaps within the health system to face the
challenges posed by climate change.

Adaptation options: information on the main adaptation options available, including their
comparative advantages, potential costs and efficiency, available for selection by health
system decision makers.

Examples of measurable outputs

Vulnerability
• Baseline rates and climate sensitivity of health conditions, allowing selection of priority
risks, and continuous monitoring of changing risk conditions and health status assessed.
• Most vulnerable populations and areas prone to health risks of climate change identified.
• Health impact assessments for key adaptation and mitigation policies and programmes
of health-determining sectors conducted.

Capacity
• Baselines on existing human resources, technical and health service delivery capacity
established, with identification of weaknesses.
• Recommendations made for addressing gaps and building health system capacity.

Adaptation options
• Assessment results used to prioritize allocation of resources and effective interventions in
health and related sectors for high risk and vulnerable populations.
• Plan defined and mechanism established for iterative review of health vulnerability and
adaptation options.

20 Operational framework for building climate resilient health systems


4.4 COMPONENT 4: Integrated risk monitoring and
early warning H
VULNER ABI L
CAPACIT Y IT Y, IN
ALT E ADAPTATIO& M EG
T
HE K FO RC EA ON RA
O R ASSESSMENN RL IT
T
Climate change is altering the incidence and distribution of many
W YW

TE ING ING
OR ARN
D
RI &
AN &

SK
CE
ERN IP
important health risks including the occurrence of extreme

G OV DER S H
LEA
weather events, and the transmission of vector-, water- and

HEALTHTE
RESEA
CLIMARCH
food-borne diseases. Building climate resilience entails:

EALTH

&
CLIMFINANCING
(i) developing adequate capacity and flexibility to understand

ATE & H

INFRA NOLO NABL ENT


TECHUSTAI ESILI
CLIM
& S TE R
how climatic conditions influence health outcomes; (ii) being able

STR GIE E

A
UC S
EN N ES EN T

TU &
to anticipate changing health risks; and (iii) informing preparedness,

C S

RE
ED EM
Y

G
D OF A
EN E T E HE AN AR
surveillance and response to needs in a timely manner.
MA VIR RMINALTH & M REP ERG
N A O NM A N TS M E S P EM
GE ENT P R O G R AM
MEN AL HEALTH ED
T OF
CLIMATEINFORM

The objective of integrated risk monitoring is to generate a holistic


perspective of health risks with real-time information. It uses a set
of diverse instruments to bring together information about climatic Key environmental risks to monitor
and environmental conditions, health conditions and response
• Extreme weather events, e.g. heavy
capacity. It is the basis for establishing early warning systems to
rainfall, wind and sandstorms
identify, forecast and communicate high-risk conditions.
• Temperatures known to induce heat
Integrated risk monitoring refers to the use of early detection tools or cold stress
and epidemiological surveillance used in conjunction with direct • Air quality
and remote sensing technologies for surveillance of environmental • UV radiation
determinants of health (e.g. water and air quality, variability in • Rainfall and humidity levels that
ambient temperature and humidity, or incidence of extreme favour or restrict vector abundance
weather events). Monitoring a broad range of signals around a • El Niño/La Niña years
health risk can allow changing conditions to be identified more • Seasonal allergen loads and
quickly in order to anticipate outbreaks and emergencies related occurrences
to weather and climatic conditions. One advantage of integrated • Water availability and quality
monitoring is that environmental data may be more standardized • Water and sanitation infrastructure
and readily available than population health data. preparedness for extreme events.
Tracking qualitative and quantitative information about community
and health system vulnerability, preparedness and response capacity levels are also
important components of risk monitoring. For example, it is important to maintain up-to-
date information on: whether high-risk regions have adequate staff and supplies during
cyclone season; whether certain areas have high concentrations of vulnerable groups; and
to identify regions and/or health facilities that could be more vulnerable to extreme events
due to setbacks caused by recent disasters, loss of leadership or resources.

Health early warning systems are designed to anticipate and alert the public and health
professionals that a rapid-onset emergency, such as an extreme weather event or disease
outbreak, is expected. This advanced alert can provide additional lead-time to deploy
appropriate preparedness measures and responses. Effective monitoring and early warning
systems can prevent avoidable illness, injury and death when coupled with adequate
response capacity.

Components 21
Information sources on climate-risks may originate from local community knowledge, as well
as multiple fields of scientific and practice-based knowledge (epidemiology, meteorology and
climate, environment, agriculture, water resource management, etc.). Relevant information
may be qualitative or quantitative, as well as observational or modelled. Because information
on environmental and climate conditions are generally best collected and analysed by their
respective authorities, health authorities are not always expected to collect these additional
data. It is recommended to establish partnerships with meteorological agencies, hydrological
services, or others to access and appropriately interpret nonhealth information.

Objectives for the implementation of this component


Integrated disease surveillance and early warnings: data on climate-sensitive
environmental risks and epidemiological trends collected, analysed and interpreted on a
continual basis and timely response to risks promoted.

Monitoring: information on climate change impacts, vulnerability, response capacity and


emergency preparedness capacity reported over time.

Communication: timely warnings communicated to health decision-makers, the media


and the public and translated into effective action to prevent negative health outcomes.

Examples of measurable outputs


Integrated disease surveillance and early warnings
• Early detection tools (e.g. rapid diagnostics, syndromic surveillance) used to identify
changing incidence and early action triggered.
• Geographic and seasonal distribution of health risks and outcomes (i.e. risk mapping)
tracked.
• Early warning systems for relevant extreme weather events and climate-sensitive diseases
(e.g. heat-stress, zoonotic diseases, undernutrition) established.

Monitoring
• Indicators on climate change impacts, vulnerability, response capacity and emergency
preparedness capacity, as well as climate and environmental variables included in relevant
monitoring systems at national level and reported over time.
• Periodic reviews for improvements or deterioration of capacities identified in V&A
assessments.
• Impacts of main environmental determinants of health monitored by the health sector.

Communication
• Communication strategy on climate risks to health developed and implemented, outlining
the scope of information for diverse audiences (e.g. media, public, health personnel and other
sectors) and events, including who should communicate, and the means of communication.
• Community engagement and feedback mechanisms established to empower affected
populations to respond to warnings, and to guide future development of monitoring and
warning systems.

22 Operational framework for building climate resilient health systems


4.5 COMPONENT 5: Health and climate research
Building climate resilience calls for both basic and applied research so ER A
BILIT
&
Y, INTEGRATED R
MONITORING ISK
&
LN PACIT YION EARLY WARNING HE
as to reduce uncertainty about how local conditions may be affected, U A
V CA PTAT NT
A S SM E RE CL I M L
D SE

TH TE
A SE
AS

A CH
&
gain insight into local solutions and capacities, and build evidence to

AR
E
KFO H
RC
WOR EALT
strengthen decision-making.

CLIMSUSTAINABLE ENVI AGEM


H

TEC RASTRUCTURE OFERMIN ENT OF


&
INF

ATE RES
HNOL
O
Research from global to local level can be used to gather knowledge

GIES &
LEADERNANCE
ERSHIP &

I L I E N T MA
on climate risks to health; the modulating effect of social and

D
GOV

E T
HEA AN AL

N
RO
environmental determinants; climate-sensitivity of diseases and

N
LTH TS
M NT
TH

E
& CING
risks; how communities and health systems currently understand and

AL
HE
PR
AN OG CL
FIN ATE IM H E R AM M
cope with climate risks; how local conditions and vulnerabilities are
NT AT ALT ES
CL
I M & MANAGEME SS EI H
NFO
PREPAREDNEY RME
EME R GENC D
connected to broader determinants; and the degree to which communities
and local health services are prepared to cope with climate-related changes
and shocks. Applied research that can develop and test new technologies, data tools
and instruments, and strategies for risk management are also critical to evidence-based
decision-making.

Research should inform existing knowledge management platforms, be effectively


communicated, and find opportunities to be translated to practice. Guidance on priority
knowledge gaps and ideas to shape national research can be found in global and regional
level research agendas, such as those led by WHO (12). These may be made more relevant
through adaptation to the specific national or subnational context.

Objectives for the implementation of this component


Research agenda: multidisciplinary national research agenda on climate change and health
defined and endorsed by stakeholders.

Support for research: research capacity on climate change and health built by supporting
relevant multidisciplinary networks, making available financial resources and creating
training opportunities.

Connect to policy: research findings on climate change and health disseminated to and
used by policy makers.

Examples of measurable outputs

Research agenda
• National research agenda on climate change and health defined through the organization
of a stakeholder forum involving representatives from health and other government
ministries, research institutions, nongovernmental organizations, the private sector and
vulnerable populations.

Components 23
Support research
• Access to and linkage of data on meteorological information, health determinants and
outcomes enabled.
• Multidisciplinary research partnerships, knowledge management networks and rosters
of local experts established.
• Financial backing mechanisms to support research programmes and postgraduate
training programmes established.

Connect to policy
• Mechanism established for researchers to inform planning, policy and stakeholder groups.
• Policy makers included in the definition and review of research agendas.

24 Operational framework for building climate resilient health systems


4.6 Component 6: Climate resilient and sustainable
technologies and infrastructure NAG
EMENT OF CLIMATE
MA IRONMENTAL 
NT HE I NF O
I LIE LE ENVTERMINANTS PROGR ALTH RME
ES AB S & DE F HEALTH AM
ME
D
O
Health system resilience to climate risks builds on provision of N GIE RE S

TEC SUS E R
O CTU

RA OL I
INF HN TA
& AT
U

EM PARE GEME
P R MA N
IM

&
R

E A
essential preventive and curative health products, from vaccines for

ST

ER DNE NT
CL

GE
NC Y S S
climate-sensitive diseases to surgical equipment. It can be further

HEALTH &
R ESEAR CH
CLIMATE

CLIMATE & HEALT


enhanced through investment in specific technologies that can

F I NAN C I NG H
reduce vulnerability to climate risks, both within and outside the

R A RING ING
T ED &
RISK
traditional health sector.

TE IT RN
IN ON Y WA
O

GO ADE
M RL

L E
VE RS
EA
G

RN
T

One important component is the provision of climate resilient health


EN A
S S M ON H I NCE
ASSE PTATI Y & Y, P&
ADAPACIT ILIT WOR
infrastructure and services. This includes ensuring that the siting of
C A ER AB K FO
VULN HEALT RCE
H

health facilities and the building codes that are applied account for current
and projected future climate risks, such as the potential for increased frequency
and intensity of heat waves, cyclones or storm surges. It also includes consideration of
climate resilience of essential environmental services to health facilities, such as water and
sanitation services which may be compromised by flood or drought, and electricity supply
that may be cut off during extreme weather events (13). Changing climatic conditions can
also influence the effectiveness of specific medical products. For example, antidepressants,
antihistamines, antipsychotics and diuretics may predispose their users to heat stroke or
heat stress when temperatures are high.

Climate resilience can also be enhanced through the use of new technologies or approaches
for better delivery of health interventions, particularly through the use of information
technology. Satellite-based remote sensing of meteorology and environmental conditions
on the ground have proven effective in improving the reliability of weather warnings,
monitoring, surveillance and risk mapping the probability of transmission of water-
borne and vector-borne diseases. Mobile communications have increased the speed and
volume of health data collection while reducing costs and improving emergency response.
Advances in information management technologies have greatly enhanced capacity to
analyse connections between environmental and health data. Systematic integration of these
technologies into disease surveillance systems can support vulnerability and adaptation
assessment, as well as surveillance and early warning.

Selection of medical technologies and products with lower environmental footprint can also
contribute to climate resilience and long-term sustainability. Processes and technologies
such as solar-powered photovoltaics, water pumps and vaccine chains can enhance
resilience by ensuring independent water and energy supplies to remote rural facilities, and
for health operations during emergencies. Use of technologies with lower energy demand
can simultaneously increase resilience and decrease the impact of the health sector on the
environment, such as reduced emissions of climate-altering pollutants associated with energy
generation. Health systems constitute a significant share of many national economies (14).
They can therefore make an important contribution to overall sustainability by taking into
account environmental impacts in relation to their procurement of medical technologies, as
well as energy, water, buildings, transport, food, waste disposal and management.

Components 25
Objectives for the implementation of this component
Adaptation of current infrastructures, technologies and processes: future climate risks
systematically considered with regard to revision or upgrading of technologies, products
and procedures for health system service delivery.

Promotion of new technologies: new technologies, processes and products selected and
deployed to increase climate resilience through enhanced health service delivery.

Sustainability of health operations: low environmental impact technologies procured and


promoted by the health sector to enhance resilience to climate and contribute to long-term
sustainability.

Examples of measurable outputs

Adaptation of current infrastructures, technologies and processes


• Specifications for siting and construction of health facilities, and energy, water and
sanitation provisions revised in line with projected climate risks.
• Training and recommendations for prescription of pharmaceuticals during extreme heat
conditions revised.

Promotion of new technologies


• New technologies such as eHealth or satellite imagery used to improve health system
performance.

Sustainability of health operations


• Impact of health sector on the environment assessed, and appropriate mechanisms to
monitor carbon emissions and environmental impacts developed.
• Sustainability in selection of products and procurement of services including energy,
water, transport and waste management assessed and prioritized by health facilities.

26 Operational framework for building climate resilient health systems


4.7 COMPONENT 7: Management of environmental
determinants of health F TE  INFORMED
LIMA HEALTH EM
TO L C PRE ERG
EN NTA S P R OGRAMMES & MA PARE ENC
M
E ME NT NA DN Y
N IN A TH GE ES
Climate change threatens health through environmental determinants,

INFRASTRUC IES & DENVIR AG


ME S
M EAL

T O
NT

E AN

OF E R

CL FIN
M

IM AN
strongly mediated by social conditions. For this reason, some of the

ATE CING
& SUSTAINSILIENT

&H
TECHNOLOGABLE

E
most effective actions that can be taken by health systems are in

TUR

EALTH
CLIMATE RE
collaboration with other sectors, i.e. through promoting a “Health

GOVE RN A IP &
LEADERSH
in all policies” approach.

HE IMATE H
CL EARC
H&

NCE
ALT
S
RE
Scaling up multisectoral public health prevention programmes can

W H
OR
NG
avoid negative health outcomes at their source and facilitate timely and
NI & K
EA FO
AR G K ASSE LT RCE
Y W RIN I S ADAPSTSMENT H
EARL NITO TED R
CAP ATION
increasingly effective responses to changing environmental and climate-
MO GR A
I NT E VULN ACIT Y &
ERABILIT Y,

related risk conditions. Health-related policies and programmes in sectors,


such as agriculture, transport, housing and energy can lead to reduced health
risks and improved health practices, behaviours and processes.

While the health sector does not usually have direct control over environmental
determinants, they have essential roles to play at both policy and programmatic levels in
providing evidence and raising awareness, joint monitoring of environmental exposures
and outcomes, defining regulatory standards and management of health risks. This requires
active coordination and intersectoral planning.

Table 2: Examples of joint actions between ministries of health and other sectors to
manage the environmental determinants of health

Environmental Important Examples of joint action


determinants of collaborating
health sectors
Air quality Industry and labour Definition and monitoring of air quality standards, worker
safety standards for heat
Energy
Promotion of energy-efficient heating and cooking
Transport
Joint implementation of health impact assessments for key
transport programmes
Water quantity and Water resources Integration of health in water resources management policy
quality
Implementation of climate resilient water safety plans
Definition and monitoring or water quality standards
Food and nutrition Agriculture and Food security forecasting and nutritional screening
security food safety
Integrated vector management
Housing Land planning Zoning and building regulations for health and other
infrastructure taking account of flood and storm risks
Housing and Ventilation standards and improved housing and building
infrastructure design
Disaster Health and public safety plans and training for extreme
management weather events
Waste management Municipal services Waste minimization, safe disposal and recycling

Components 27
Objectives for the implementation of this component
Monitoring: joint monitoring of climate-sensitive environmental risks against evidence-
based standards.

Regulation: regulatory policies protecting populations against climate-sensitive


environmental risks defined, revised and enforced.

Coordinated management: environmental determinants of health jointly managed, with


clear roles and responsibilities defined across sectors.

Examples of measurable outputs

Monitoring
• Integrated monitoring systems allowing collection and analysis of data on environmental
hazards, socioeconomic factors and health outcomes established.
• Evidence-based quality standards for climate-sensitive environmental conditions defined.

Regulation
• Regulations on key environmental determinants of health (air quality, water quality, food
quality, housing safety, waste management) revised and enforced to reflect broader ranges
of expected climatic conditions.
• Building regulations and waste management infrastructure, environmentally sustainable
and resistant to likely local extreme events promoted.

Coordinated management
• Health impact assessments for policy and programmes in sectors such as transport,
agriculture and energy, implemented.
• Joint multisectoral risk management approaches to health risks related to disasters, water,
waste, food and air pollution (e.g. food safety, diarrhoeal disease control, integrated vector
management, joined-up risk communication) undertaken.

28 Operational framework for building climate resilient health systems


4.8 COMPONENT 8: Climate-informed health programmes
Health programming and operations should consider climate risks and IL I EN
RES LE
T MANAGEMENT O
E NV I RONMEN F
TA
A TE AINABIES & DETERMINANTS L C
IN LIM
vulnerability and increasingly become climate-resilient through L IM UST LOG TURE OF HEALTH
C & S NO RUC PR HE FO
O

AT ED
CH ST GR A

RMLTH MES
TE FRA

E
assessment, programming and implementation. IN

AM
RES IMAT &
CL LTH
EAR E
CH
HE A

&M
PREANAGEMENT
EMERREDNESS
In addition to collaboration with other actors, the health sector

PA
GENC Y
MO LY WARNING
RISK
is also often directly responsible for programmes that address

INTE NITORING &


GRATED
climate-sensitive health risks (such as vector-borne and water-

CLIM
R

FI NA E & H
A

A
E
borne diseases), health response during extreme weather events and

T
NC EAL
CI ATIOENT
AB T Y & N

I NG T H
M
Y,

S
nutritional crises.

T
S
SE T

IL I
AS DAP A
A AP ER GO
C N LE VER
L AD N A
VU ERS NCE
CE
WORK FOR HIP

Health programming and operations should increasingly be designed


&
HEALTH

and implemented taking into account both current climate variability


and projected future climate change. In combination with other
Departments and
factors, these will influence the geographical distribution, timing of
programmes that can become
occurrence and intensity of burden of these climate-sensitive diseases.
climate-informed
Existing efforts in disaster risk reduction, public health preparedness, • Communicable diseases control
and several vertical programmes for communicable and (particularly by zoonotic and
noncommunicable diseases may either not be adequate, be rendered vector-borne disease control units)
ineffective or unsustainable, or not be needed. Such programmes • Noncommunicable diseases
can become climate resilient by using information about current
• Water and sanitation
and projected future climate conditions to identify capacity gaps and
• Nutrition, food hygiene and safety
inform policy, strategic investment and planning decisions.
• Occupational health
Specific health programmes can use information gathered through • Environmental health
the implementation of the component related to “information and • Maternal and child health
early warning systems” (e.g. V&A assessments, research, integrated • Geriatrics
risk monitoring and early warning systems) to improve their decision- • Mental health
making capabilities and adjust the scale of intervention accordingly. • Disasters and emergency
For example, health programming informed by early warnings about management
a potential outbreak or heat wave can use time wisely to prepare • Facilities management
operations for increased patient loads and special needs. Climate-
• Health statistics and information
informed programming will continually review and adjust service
• Pharmacies.
delivery according to new information.

Components 29
Table 3: Examples of climate-informed health interventions

Climate-related health Example of interventions


risks and mechanisms
Extreme heat and • Establish occupational health exposure standards
thermal stress
• Improve health facility design, energy efficient cooling and heating
systems
• Ensure public education to promote behaviour change, e.g. in relation
to clothing, ventilation, etc.
• Develop heat-health action plans, including early warning, public
communication, and responses, such as cooling centres for high-risk
populations
Water-borne and food- • Enhance disease surveillance systems during high-risk seasons/
borne diseases periods
• Strengthen food and water quality control
Zoonotic and vector- • Expand the scope of diseases monitored, and monitor at the margins
borne diseases of current geographic distributions to detect spread
• Establish early warning systems if appropriate
• Establish vector/pest control
• Enhance diagnostic and treatment options in high-risk regions/periods
• Ensure adequate animal and human vaccination coverage
Allergic diseases and • Develop exposure forecasts – air quality, allergens, dust
cardiopulmonary health
• Enforce stricter air quality standards for pollution
• Establish allergen management
• Plan for increased demand for treatment during high-risk seasons or
weather conditions
Nutrition • Perform seasonal nutritional screening in high-risk communities
• Scale up integrated food security, nutrition and health programming
in fragile zones
• Promote public education and food hygiene
Storms and floods • Include climate risk in siting, designing or retrofitting health
infrastructure
• Establish early warning and early action systems, including education
and community mobilization
• Assess and retrofit or construct public health infrastructure (e.g.
health facilities in flood-prone areas) to sustain increased extreme
weather conditions, warmer temperatures, environmental changes
Mental health and • Address special needs of mental health patients (as well as other
disability disabilities) by developing emergency preparedness plans
• Address mental health needs of disaster- and trauma-exposed
populations
• Establish community watch for people with mental illness during
extreme weather conditions

30 Operational framework for building climate resilient health systems


Objectives for the implementation of this component
Health programming: information on current and projected (future) climatic conditions
integrated into strategic planning of health programmes for climate-sensitive diseases.

Delivery of interventions: public health programmes revise their standard operating


procedures to respond to climate risks in delivery of interventions.

Examples of measurable outputs

Health programming
• Medium- and long-term plans for disease control programmes revised to consider
capacities that may be stressed or exceeded by climate change.
• Investment plans defined to address identified capacity gaps.

Delivery of interventions
• Risk maps and analysis of seasonal trends in diseases used to target resources and
preventive measures for those most at risk.
• Contingency plans for healthcare provision in extreme weather events, or delivery of
interventions to control outbreaks of infectious diseases in new locations, developed and
tested.

Components 31
4.9 COMPONENT 9: Emergency preparedness and
management
ATE & H
CLIMFINANCING
EALTH LEAD Outbreaks and health emergencies triggered by climate variability
G OV ER S H
CY S ERN IP
EN NES NT
ED EME
AN &
CE are primary concerns of climate change. Climate-informed
& MREPA ERG

G
AN R

preparedness plans, emergency systems, and community-based


P EM

WO
HE K FO RC
R
disaster and emergency management are essential for building
ALT
D

H
OF CLIMATEINFORME

ES

E climate resilience. Thus, health systems and communities


P R O G R AMM
HEALTH

VULNER ABI L
should aim to holistically manage overall public health risks and
ASSESSMENN
ADAPT
CAPACIT Y IT Y,

emphasize preparedness in addition to the usual focus on response


A
N TS

T
ENT TAL

MA VIR RMINALTH

I O
&
T
AG NMEN A
EN E TE HE

capacity. Responses are often late and dominated by ‘emergency’


EM

EA ON R A
D OF
O

M TEG
RL IT

IN
YW O
N

programming and crisis response, which are resource intensive and


RE AR
TU & N
UC S T E R I N G ING
STR GIE E
INFRA NOLO NABL ENT D &
RIS
not effective in building resilience.
TECHUSTAI ESILI RESEA K
& S TE R CLIMARCH
CLIM
A HEALTHTE
&

Health operations including healthcare


and public health infrastructure should be
Managing changing risks of climate extremes and
increasingly prepared to address changing
disasters
population catchments, service demands,
IPCC, special report on managing the risks of extreme events increase emergency response and operate under
and disasters to advance climate change adaptation diverse environmental conditions. For example,
• Measures that provide benefits under current climate new facilities and service routes should be
and a range of future climate change scenarios, called appropriately located and adequately robust to
low-regrets measures, are available starting points for be safe and remain functional during the type of
addressing projected trends in exposure, vulnerability and extreme weather events projected for a particular
climate extremes area. This includes infrastructure for water
• Effective risk management generally involves a portfolio supplies, drainage, waste disposal and sanitation,
of actions to reduce and transfer risk and to respond to as well as telecommunications, energy supplies
events and disasters, as opposed to a singular focus on and medical transport. Another example is that
any one action or type of action pharmacies should have protocols and practices
for safe storage and transport of pharmaceuticals,
• Multihazard risk management approaches provide
vaccines and medical equipment in extreme heat
opportunities to reduce complex and compound hazards
conditions.
• Opportunities exist to create synergies in international
finance for disaster risk management and adaptation to Community-based actions are at the forefront of
climate change, but these have not yet been fully realized protecting health in emergencies. Community
• Stronger efforts at the international level do not necessarily knowledge of local risks and vulnerable groups
lead to substantive and rapid results at the local level is essential to identify and address actual needs
• Integration of local knowledge with additional scientific of the community. A prepared, active and well-
and technical knowledge can improve disaster risk organized community can reduce risks, save
reduction and climate change lives and minimize the impact of emergencies.
• Appropriate and timely risk communication is critical for
effective adaptation and disaster risk management WHO is in the process of developing an
Emergency and Disaster Risk Management
• An iterative process of monitoring, research, evaluation,
for Health (EDRM-H) Policy Framework,
learning and innovation can reduce disaster risk and promote
which includes principles, programmes and
adaptive management in the context of climate extremes.
activities for effective management of risks (15).

32 Operational framework for building climate resilient health systems


Operational guidance is available for emergency managers to enhance capacity to manage
the health risks associated with emergencies and disasters.

Objectives for the implementation of this component


Inform policies and protocols: emergency and disaster risk management protocols and
policies adequately informed by current and likely future climatic conditions.

Risk management: strengthen health system capacity to manage risks so that overall
vulnerability and exposure to hazards are reduced and residual risks and uncertainties
effectively managed.

Empowerment of communities: empower communities to effectively prevent and respond


to the health risks posed by extreme weather events.

Examples of measurable outputs

Inform policies and protocols


• Climate-sensitive health risks included under national disaster reduction strategy and
plans, and wider development processes.

Risk management
• Risk assessments for current and projected future exposure to extreme weather events
routinely used to inform health sector strategic development plans.
• Health sector contingency plans for extreme weather events developed, including risk
reduction, preparedness and response, in line with the WHO emergency response
framework.
• Emergency response plans for individual health facilities defined and implemented in
case of need.

Community empowerment
• Stakeholder mechanism to support participation, dialogue and information exchange,
to empower civil society and community groups as primary actors in emergency
preparedness and response established.
• Capacity development programmes implemented to identify and support the roles of
local communities to identify risks, prevent exposure to hazards and take action to save
lives in extreme weather events.

Components 33
4.10 COMPONENT 10: Climate and health financing
Effectively protecting health from climate change will incur financial
IP &
DERSH
costs for health systems. For example, health systems may need to
L E A E RN AN C E H
TH WOR EALTH
AL GOV KFO
HE NG RC
E
C I
expend resources to expand the geographic or seasonal range or
AN &
FIN TE

VU CAP PTAT ENT


A
IM

LN ACIT ION
population coverage of surveillance and control programmes for
ADSSES
CL

ER Y &
A
A SM

ABI
LIT Y
climate-sensitive infectious diseases, or to retrofit health facilities
& MANAGEMEN S
T
PREPAREDNES
EME RG E NC Y

,
EARLY WARNIN&
to withstand more extreme weather events. Additional investment
INTEGRATED RIS
MONITORING K
may also be needed in other sectors to achieve health goals, such as
MED
TE ALTH MES

implementing climate resilient water safety plans, or enhanced food


G
FOR
IM H E R AM
 IN

OG

security forecasting and nutritional screening during droughts.


RE CLIM LT
SE
PR

HE
A

R
AT CH
A

H
ALT NTS
CL

INF H E
TEC RASTRUCTURE OF HE INA NTAL F &
H M
& SUNOLOGIES & DETERONME NT O
E NV I R GE ME
In order to mobilize and apply resources to these issues, assessments
CLIM STAINABLE
ATE R
E S I L I E N T MA N A

of resource requirements, available finance, finance gaps and


opportunities to fill them, are all needed. Resource requirements
Main climate change can be assessed through budgeting of interventions selected in the
funding mechanisms previously described components, and compared with existing
budgets and funding sources to identify shortfalls that need to be
Global Environmental Facility
addressed through mobilization of new resources. For example, if
• Least Developed Countries Fund:
an increase in extreme weather events is predicted, then resources
http://www.thegef.org/gef/ldcf
will need to be mobilized for contingencies or to cover the costs of
• Special Climate Change Fund: insurance or replacement costs for damaged health facilities, and
http://www.thegef.org/gef/sccf lost or damaged uninsured equipment in extreme weather events.
Kyoto Protocol Planning and management teams should consider that in addition
• Adaptation Fund: to adequate development funds to maintain core healthcare and
https://www.adaptation-fund.org/ public health services (i.e. water/sanitation/environmental hygiene/
disaster and health emergency preparedness), climate change-
UNFCCC
specific funding mechanisms should be accessed so as to effectively
• Green Climate Fund:
build the resilience of the system.
http://www.gcfund.org/home.html
A comprehensive approach to financing health protection from
climate change will first build on core investments in the health sector, such as investments
to ensure adequate numbers of trained health personnel, and basic health infrastructure and
services, which also help to address climate change risks. This can be from national resources
or external donors. For example, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation provides significant
support to combat diarrhoeal diseases and malaria, as well as for emergency response, which
simultaneously improves health and decreases vulnerability to climate change. The Global
Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria (GFATM) supports overall malaria control,
including some investments specifically in collection of meteorological data, to predict and
manage seasonal and inter-annual variations in malaria transmission.

Resources can also be mobilized by combining climate change and health considerations
in investments in key health determining sectors. For example, national governments and
donors make very large investments in water and sanitation, which improve health and
generally reduce climate vulnerability. Adding criteria for climate resilience and health
promotion to investment strategies can ensure that these investments bring the greatest

34 Operational framework for building climate resilient health systems


possible benefits in terms of human health, climate adaptation and social return on
investment over the long term. This approach applies to international as well as national
financing streams. For example, the Global Facility for Disaster Reduction and Recovery has
funding streams on both adaptation and mitigation. Investments for risk reduction in sectors
ranging from water resources to food and nutrition security can protect and promote health.

Opportunities are now becoming available to mobilize additional resources specifically


to address additional risks presented by climate change, including for health. At the
international level, the main multilateral mechanisms are mandated under the UNFCCC
and the Kyoto Protocol, promoting financial assistance from more developed parties to those
countries deemed more vulnerable and with fewer resources available to adapt to climate
change. Parties to the UNFCCC have mandated the Global Environmental Facility (GEF)
to manage the Special Climate Change Fund and the Least Developed Countries Fund,
established the Adaptation Fund under the Kyoto Protocol and recently the Green Climate
Fund (16). Further guidance on entry points for health under each of these funding streams
is provided by WHO (17). In addition to the main international climate change specific
funding mechanisms, funding is also available through bilateral and regional channels.

Objectives for the implementation of this component


Health-specific funding mechanisms: climate change considerations included in proposals
related to climate-sensitive diseases submitted to and funded by health funding mechanisms.

Funding for sectors influencing health: health and climate change considerations
incorporated in projects and programmes supported through development funding available
for main health determining sectors.

Climate change funding streams: climate change funding mechanisms available at national
level accessed.

Examples of measurable outputs


Health-specific funding mechanisms
• Resources to increase resilience to climate variability and climate change included as a
line item in national or subnational health investment plans.
• Proposals to external donors to support control of climate-sensitive diseases (e.g. GFATM
on malaria control) included climate variability and change.

Development funding in sectors influencing health


• Screening for climate variability, climate change risks and health protection, included as
a criteria for selecting investments in key health determining sectors, such as water and
sanitation, and food and nutrition security.
• Health impacts of climate change monitored in programmes funded through financial
mechanisms specific to health-determining sectors.

Climate change funding streams


• Projects and programmes on building health system resilience submitted to and granted by
the main international climate change funds (e.g. the GEF, Adaptation Fund, bilateral donors).
Components 35
5
Monitoring progress
Monitoring of both the implementation of this framework and the extent to which its aim
to build climate resilient health systems is achieved, is fundamental for it to be effective.

The intended ultimate impact of implementing the operational framework will be a decrease
in the burden of climate-sensitive diseases, and a strengthening in the overall resilience of the
health system. The following table includes proposed indicators of progress at the outcome
level for each of the six building blocks of health systems. The examples of measurable
outputs proposed for each of the components above has also been added to the table so as
to provide a comprehensive monitoring framework.

36 Operational framework for building climate resilient health systems



Table 4: Example indicators for monitoring the implementation of the WHO operational framework on building climate-resilient health systems

Six building Example indicators Ten components Examples of measurable outputs to enhance climate resilience
blocks of at outcome level of the operational
health systems framework
Leadership and Main policies and Leadership and Governance
governance strategies for climate governance
• Climate change and health focal points designated within the health ministry, with specific programme of
change, health and
action and budget allocated.
health-determining
sectors (e.g. water • Climate change and health focal points or units, work in collaboration with relevant climate-sensitive health
and sanitation, food programmes (e.g. vector-borne diseases, infectious diseases, nutrition, disaster risk reduction) to build
and nutrition security) resilience of programmes.
reflect climate
change and health Policy
connections • National strategy on health and climate change and/or H-NAP developed.
Cross-sectoral collaboration
• Agreements (e.g. Memoranda of Understanding) between the health ministry and main stakeholders at
national level signed, which include specific roles and responsibilities in relation to protecting health from
climate change.
• Health representation ensured in main climate change processes at national, regional and global levels (e.g.
UNFCCC meetings and COP, NAP, national communications to the UNFCCC).
• Main policies and strategies from health-determining sectors reflect climate change and health
considerations both in relation to adaptation (e.g. climate-resilient water safety plans) and mitigation (e.g.
health cobenefits in transport policies).
• Health impact assessments conducted for new mitigation and adaptation policies and programmes in all
health determining sectors (in accordance with article 4.1.f of the UNFCCC).
Health workforce Percentage of Health workforce Human resources
healthcare personnel
• Training courses on climate change and health topics targeting health personnel conducted.
with information and
training to address • Curricula on climate change and health developed and imparted at secondary and/or tertiary levels.
climate change
and health links, Organizational capacity development
appropriate to their • Contingency plans for the deployment of sufficient health personnel in case of acute shocks, such as
role and function extreme weather events and outbreaks developed at the relevant level (i.e. national, provincial, local).
(as determined by a
survey) • Realistic and innovative capacity-building plans (e.g. from capacity or vulnerability and adaptation
assessments), developed to address identified human resources and institutional capacity gaps.

Monitoring progress
• Contingencies, adaptation costs and potential losses and damages from climate change incorporated by
management staff into investment plans.

37
38
Six building Example indicators Ten components Examples of measurable outputs to enhance climate resilience
blocks of at outcome level of the operational
health systems framework
Communications and awareness raising
• Development and implementation of internal and external communication plans (including the development
of knowledge products) to raise awareness of health and climate change and response options targeting key
audiences, such as health professionals and decision-makers, communities, the media and other sectors.
• Health professionals, the media and community leaders trained in risk communication, including
communication of uncertainty.
• Stakeholder forum on protecting health from climate change established as a way to engage health-
determining sectors and the community.
Health Number of climate- Vulnerability, Vulnerability
information sensitive diseases capacity and
• Baseline rates, and climate sensitivity of health conditions, allowing selection of priority risks, and
systems for which there are adaptation
continuous monitoring of changing risk conditions and health status assessed.
monitoring systems assessment
that are able to • Most vulnerable populations and areas prone to health risks of climate change identified.
forecast and monitor
risks and/or to monitor • Health impact assessments for key adaptation and mitigation policies and programmes of health-
disease risks posed by determining sectors conducted.
climate variability and Capacity

Operational framework for building climate resilient health systems


change
• Baselines on existing human resources, technical and health service delivery capacity established, with
identification of weaknesses.
• Recommendations made for addressing gaps and building health systems capacity.
Adaptation options
• Assessment results used to prioritize allocation of resources and effective interventions in health and
related-sectors for high risk and vulnerable populations.
• Plan defined and mechanism established for iterative review of health vulnerability and adaptation options.

Six building Example indicators Ten components Examples of measurable outputs to enhance climate resilience
blocks of at outcome level of the operational
health systems framework
Integrated risk Integrated disease surveillance and early warning
monitoring and
• Early detection tools (e.g. rapid diagnostics, syndromic surveillance) used to identify changing incidence
early warning
and early action triggered.
• Geographic and seasonal distribution of health risks and outcomes (i.e. risk mapping) tracked.
• Early warning systems for relevant extreme weather events and climate-sensitive diseases (e.g. heat stress,
zoonotic diseases, undernutrition) established.
Monitoring
• Indicators on climate change impacts, vulnerability, response capacity and emergency preparedness
capacity, as well as climate and environmental variables included in relevant monitoring systems at national
level and reported over time.
• Periodic reviews for improvements or deterioration of capacities identified in V&A assessments.
• Impacts of main environmental determinants of health monitored by the health sector.
Communication
• Communication strategy on climate risks to health developed and implemented, outlining the scope of
information for diverse audiences (e.g. media, public, health personnel and other sectors) and events,
including who should communicate and the means of communication.
• Community engagement and feedback mechanisms established to empower affected populations to respond
to warnings, and to guide future development of monitoring and warning systems.
Health and climate Research agenda
research
• National research agenda on climate change and health defined through the organization of a stakeholder
forum involving representatives from health and other government ministries, research institutions,
nongovernmental organizations, the private sector and vulnerable populations.
Support research
• Access to, and linkage of, data on meteorological information, health determinants and outcomes enabled.
• Multidisciplinary research partnerships, knowledge management networks and rosters of local experts
established.
• Financial backing mechanisms to support research programmes and postgraduate training programmes
established.
• Connect to policy
• Mechanism established for researchers to inform planning, policy and stakeholder groups.

Monitoring progress
• Policy makers included in the definition and review of research agendas.

39
40
Six building Example indicators Ten components Examples of measurable outputs to enhance climate resilience
blocks of at outcome level of the operational
health systems framework
Essential Percentage of Climate resilient Adaptation of current technologies and processes
medical products healthcare facilities and sustainable
• Specifications for siting and construction of health facilities, and energy, water and sanitation provisions
and technologies incorporating technologies and
revised in line with projected climate risks.
climate variability infrastructure
and change in • Training and recommendations for prescription of pharmaceuticals during extreme heat conditions revised.
siting, construction,
technologies and Promotion of new technologies
procedures to ensure • New technologies such as eHealth or satellite imagery used to improve health system performance.
provision of basic
services (including Sustainability of health operations
energy, water and • Impact of health sector on the environment assessed, and appropriate mechanisms to monitor carbon
sanitation). emissions and environmental impacts developed.
• Sustainability in selection of products and procurement of services including energy, water, transport and
waste management assessed and prioritized by health facilities.
Service delivery Percentage of Management of Monitoring
medium- and long- environmental
• Integrated monitoring systems allowing collection and analysis of data on environmental hazards,
term plans for determinants of
socioeconomic factors and health outcomes exist.
control programmes health

Operational framework for building climate resilient health systems


for climate- • Evidence-based quality standards for climate-sensitive environmental conditions defined.
sensitive diseases
and emergency Regulation
management that • Regulations on key environmental determinants of health (air quality, water quality, food quality, housing
include consideration safety, waste management) revised and enforced to reflect broader range of expected climatic conditions.
of climate change
risks. • Building regulations and waste management infrastructure, environmentally sustainable and resistant to
likely local extreme events promoted.
Coordinated management
• Health impact assessments for policy and programmes in sectors such as transport, agriculture and energy,
implemented.
• Joint multisectoral risk management approaches to health risks related to disasters, water, waste, food and
air pollution (e.g. food safety, diarrhoeal disease control, integrated vector management, joined up risk
communication) undertaken.

Six building Example indicators Ten components Examples of measurable outputs to enhance climate resilience
blocks of at outcome level of the operational
health systems framework
Climate-informed Health programming
health programmes
• Medium- and long-term plans for disease control programmes revised to consider capacities that may be
stressed or exceeded by climate change.
• Investment plans defined to address identified capacity gaps.
Delivery of interventions
• Risk maps and analysis of seasonal trends in diseases used to target resources and preventive measures for
those most at risk.
• Contingency plans for healthcare provision in extreme weather events, or delivery of interventions to control
outbreaks of infectious disease in new locations developed and tested.
Emergency Policies and protocols
preparedness and
• Climate-sensitive health risks included under national disaster reduction strategy and plans, and wider
management
development processes.
Risk management
• Risk assessments for current and projected future exposure to extreme weather events routinely used to
inform health sector strategic development plans.
• Health sector contingency plans for extreme weather events developed, including risk reduction,
preparedness and response, in line with the WHO emergency response framework.
• Emergency response plans for individual health facilities defined and implemented in case of need.
Community empowerment
• Establishment of stakeholder mechanisms to support participation, dialogue and information exchange, to
empower civil society and community groups as primary actors in emergency preparedness and response.
• Implementation of capacity development programmes to identify and support the roles of local communities
to determine risks, prevent exposure to hazards and take action to save lives in extreme weather events.

Monitoring progress
41
42
Six building Example indicators Ten components Examples of measurable outputs to enhance climate resilience
blocks of at outcome level of the operational
health systems framework
Financing Percentage of the Climate and health Health-specific funding mechanisms
national health financing
• Resources to increase resilience to climate variability and climate change included as a line item in
budget that addresses
national and/or subnational health investment plans.
risks posed by climate
variability and change • Proposals to external donors to support control of climate-sensitive diseases (e.g. GFATM on malaria
control), included climate variability and change.
Development funding in sectors influencing health
• Screening for climate variability, climate change risks and health protection, included as a criteria for
selecting investments in key health determining sectors, such as water and sanitation, and food and
nutrition security.
• Health impacts of climate change monitored in programmes funded through financial mechanisms specific
to health-determining sectors.
Climate change funding streams
• Projects and programmes on building health system resilience submitted to and granted by the main
international climate change funds (e.g. the GEF, Adaptation Fund, bilateral donors).

Operational framework for building climate resilient health systems


Note: As health systems vary, the final definition of indicators will be context specific. The table gives proposed examples of measurable indicators of progress in implementation
of “building blocks” in health systems overall, i.e. the combined effect of implementation of the various components described above. It also gives examples of specific outputs
that contribute to these components.
Conclusions
Climate change, interacting with a range of other factors, places increasing stress on health.
The structured framework presented here aims to ensure that health systems provide a
comprehensive, efficient and equitable response, and ultimately continue to protect and
improve population health in light of the varied current and future risks presented by
climate variability and climate change. This approach is grounded in the core functions of
6
the health sector, but linked to the wider environmental and social determinants of health.

In addition to changes in climate and other environmental and social determinants of


health, health systems themselves are also changing rapidly. For this reason, the framework
should be implemented in a flexible way to take into account different country contexts,
and iteratively, take advantage of new evidence, experience and lessons learned from within
and outside the country, as well as changing circumstances. Applied in this way, climate
resilient health systems can help to promote and safeguard the provision of Universal Health
Coverage, and make an important contribution to overall sustainable development.

Conclusions 43
Terminology
This section draws upon glossaries and definitions provided by the IPCC (5), the International
Strategy for Disaster Reduction (18), and WHO (19) .

Adaptation: refers to the process of adjustment to actual or expected climate and its effects.
In human systems, adaptation seeks to moderate harm or exploit beneficial opportunities.
In natural systems, human interventions may facilitate adjustment to expected climate and
its effects. In public health, the analogous term is “prevention”. Various types of adaptations
exist, including anticipatory and reactive, private and public, autonomous and planned.
Adaptation responds to immediate threats of climate vulnerability (commonly addressed
with disaster risk reduction, emergency response and epidemic management), but primarily
seeks to identify and plan for large-scale risks and trends posed by long-term environmental
and climatic changes such as sea-level rise, changing ground and surface water availability,
changes in disease vector distribution and crop pests, changes in air quality, glacial retreat,
UV exposures, and extreme and increasing temperatures. Resilience to climate change
usually requires a capacity to anticipate climate change and plan needed adaptations.

Adaptive capacity is the ability of a system to adjust to climate change, to moderate potential
damages, to take advantage of opportunities, or to cope with the consequences.

Climate change refers to any change in the climate over time, generally decades or longer,
whether due to natural variability or as a result of human activity.

Climate variability refers to trends in variation in the mean state and other statistics of the
climate on all temporal and spatial scales beyond that of individual weather events. Extreme
weather (storms, extreme temperatures) and climate events (drought) are part of climate
variability trends.

Climate-resilient health systems have the ability to anticipate, respond to, cope with,
recover from and adapt to climate-related shocks and stresses, so as to bring sustained
improvements in population health, despite an unstable climate.

Climate-sensitive health outcome is any health outcome whose geographic range, incidence
or intensity of transmission is directly or indirectly associated with weather or climate.

Climate-related risks are additional (exacerbated) risks that people and their livelihoods
and assets face due to climate change. These risks can be direct, such as in exposure to
more frequent heat waves or floods; or indirect, such as when a drought negatively impacts
food supplies (and prices) and in effect livelihoods and nutrition. Certain groups may also
face increased risks from measures taken in response to climate change (such as adaptation
measures that protect certain areas of a city from flooding but increase flood-risks in
other areas) or for mitigation (such as new hydropower schemes displacing populations or
increasing malaria vector breeding sites).

44 Operational framework for building climate resilient health systems


Exposure is the amount of a factor to which a group or individual is exposed; sometimes
contrasted with dose (the amount that enters or interacts with the organism). Exposures
may be either beneficial or harmful. Exposure to climatic conditions that affect health is
heavily influenced by location, socioeconomic conditions and human behaviour.

Climate risk management is an approach to identify hazards and impacts associated


with both climate variability and climate change, and provides tools for decision-making
in response. Climate risk management aims to reduce negative impacts through “climate
informed decisions” which couple information about the climate system and meteorological
conditions along with the known associations to health outcomes, and incorporates this
knowledge into decision-making on planning, forecasting, systems management and
geographic or spatial targeting, or risk management interventions. Climate risk management
encourages handling of current climate-related risks as a basis for managing and building
capacity to address more complex, long-term risks associated with climate change.

Climate change mitigation refers to policies and measures used to reduce greenhouse gas
emissions (carbon) and/or enhance sinks such as forests, as a means to slow down and
reduce future and more dangerous climate change. Climate change mitigation is primary
prevention of future harm for decades in the future and necessitates public education and
awareness along with use of low-carbon technology.

A disaster is a serious disruption of the functioning of a community or a society involving


widespread human, material, economic or environmental losses and impacts, which exceeds
the ability of the affected community or society to cope using its own resources. 

Disaster risk is the potential loss expressed in lives, health status, livelihoods, assets and
services, which could occur in a particular community or a society due to the impact of a
natural hazard.

Disaster risk reduction is a systematic approach to identifying, assessing and reducing


disaster risk. Specifically, disaster risk reduction aims to minimize vulnerabilities and
disaster risks throughout a society in order to avoid (prevent) or limit (mitigate and prepare
for) the adverse impacts of natural hazards, and facilitate sustainable development. Disaster
risk reduction addresses climate-related disasters (drought, extreme weather events such
as floods, cyclones, and storms) and encompasses nonclimatic hazards, such as tsunamis,
volcanoes and earthquakes.

A health system comprises all the organizations, institutions and resources that are devoted
to producing actions principally aimed at improving, maintaining or restoring health. Health
systems involve numerous stakeholders from individual and community to government,
at local, subnational and national levels. The health system is recognized by WHO to be
made up of six key building blocks: (i) leadership and governance; (ii) health workforce; (iii)
health information systems; (iv) essential medical products and technologies; (v) financing;
all of which lead to (vi) service delivery. The goal of a health system is to deliver effective
preventive and curative health services to the full population, equitably and efficiently, while
protecting individuals from catastrophic healthcare costs.

Terminology 45
Health system strengthening refers to improving the six health system building blocks
and managing their interactions in ways that achieve more equitable and sustained
improvements across health services and health outcomes, requiring both technical and
political knowledge as well as action.

Resilience is the capacity of a social-ecological system to cope with a hazardous event


or disturbance, responding or reorganizing in ways that maintain its essential function,
identity and structure, while also maintaining the capacity for adaptation, learning and
transformation.

Vulnerability is the degree to which individuals and systems are susceptible to or unable
to cope with adverse effects of climate change including climate variability and extremes.
The vulnerability and coping capacity of particular populations to changing meteorological
conditions and its human and social consequences is influenced by a variety of factors. These
include biological factors, sociocultural factors and access to and control over resources.

46 Operational framework for building climate resilient health systems


References
1. Smith KR, Woodward A, Campbell-Lendrum DD, Chadee Y, Honda Q, Liu JM, et al. Human health: impacts,
adaptation, and co-benefits. In: Field CB, Barros VR, Dokken DJ, Mach KJ, Mastrandrea MD, Bilir TE, et
al., editors. Climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part A: global and sectoral aspects.
Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate
Change. Cambridge, UK and New York, USA: Cambridge University Press; 2014 (https://ipcc-wg2.gov/AR5/images/
uploads/WGIIAR5-Chap11_FINAL.pdf, accessed 26 July 2015).
2. Climate change and health. Resolution of the Sixty-First World Health Assembly. Geneva: World Health Organization;
2008 (http://www.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/A61/A61_R19-en.pdf, accessed 26 July 2015).
3. Climate change and human health: projects. In: WHO/Geneva programmes [website] Geneva: World Health
Organization; 2015 (www.who.int/globalchange/projects accessed 26 July 2015).
4. WHO guidance to protect health from climate change through health adaptation planning. Geneva: World Health
Organization; 2014 (http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/137383/1/9789241508001_eng.pdf?ua=1, accessed 26
July 2015).
5. IPCC. Summary for policymakers. In: Stocker TF, Qin D, Plattner,GK, Tignor M, Allen SK, Boschung J, et al., editors.
Climate Change 2013: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report
of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, UK and New York, USA: Cambridge University
Press; 2013 (https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/wg1/citation/WGIAR5_Citations_FinalRev1.pdf, accessed 26 July 2015).
6. IPCC. Glossary. In: Field CB, Barros VR, Dokken DJ, Mach KJ, Mastrandrea MD, Bilir TE, et al., editors. Climate
change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects Contribution of Working
Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, UK and
New York, USA: Cambridge University Press; 2014.
7. International health regulations. WHO/Geneva health topics [website] Geneva: World Health Organization; 2007
(http://www.who.int/topics/international_health_regulations/en/, accessed 26 July 2015).
8. Defining disaster resilience: a DFID approach paper. UK: Department for International Development; 2011 (https://
www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/186874/defining-disaster-resilience-
approach-paper.pdf, accessed 26 July 2015).
9. Hess JJ, McDowell JZ, Luber G. Integrating climate change adaptation into public health practice: using adaptive
management to increase adaptive capacity and build resilience. Environmental Health Perspectives 2012;120(2):171–9.
10. Monitoring the building blocks of health systems: a handbook of indicators and their measurement strategies. Geneva:
World Health Organization; 2010 (http://www.who.int/healthinfo/systems/monitoring/en/, accessed 26 July 2015).
11. Protecting health from climate change: vulnerability and adaptation assessment. Geneva: World Health Organization;
2013 (http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/104200/1/9789241564687_eng.pdf?ua=1, accessed 26 July 2015).
12. Protecting health from climate change: global research priorities. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2009 (http://
www.who.int/phe/news/madrid_report_661_final_lowres.pdf, accessed 26 July 2015).
13. Vision 2030: the resilience of water supply and sanitation in the face of climate change. Summary and policy
implications. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2009 (https://extranet.who.int/iris/restricted/handle/10665/44172,
accessed 26 July 2015).
14. Chung JW, Meltzer DO. Estimate of the carbon footprint of the US health care sector. Journal of the American
Medical Association 2009;302(18):1970–2.
15. Meeting report on the consultation on the health emergency risk management framework and improving public
health preparedness, 21–23 November 2012. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2013 (http://apps.who.int/iris/
bitstream/10665/78359/1/WHO_HSE_HEA_HSP_2013.1_eng.pdf, accessed 24 August 2015).
16. Climate finance. United Nations Framework Convention of Climate Change [website] 2015 (http://unfccc.int/
cooperation_and_support/financial_mechanism/items/2807.php, accessed 26 July 2015).
17. Financial resources for implementation of adaptation. WHO/Climate change and human health [website]. Geneva:
World Health Organization; 2015 (http://www.who.int/globalchange/financial_sources_adaptation_implementation/
en/, accessed 26 July 2015).
18. Terminology on disaster risk reduction. The United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction/Terminology
[website]; 2015 (http://www.unisdr.org/we/inform/terminology, accessed 26 July 2015).
19. Everybody’s business: strengthening health systems to improve health outcomes. WHO’s framework for action.
Geneva: World Health Organization; 2007 (http://www.who.int/healthsystems/strategy/everybodys_business.pdf,
accessed 26 July 2015).

References 47
PUBLIC HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT
This document presents the World Health Organization (WHO) Operational framework for
building climate resilient health systems. The framework responds to the demand from
Member States and partners for guidance on how the health sector and its operational basis
and health systems can systematically and effectively address the challenges increasingly
presented by climate variability and change.

Primarily intended for public health professionals and health managers, this framework
would also help guide decision-makers in other health-determining sectors, such as
nutrition, water and sanitation, and emergency management. International development
agencies could use this framework to focus investments and country support for public
health, health system strengthening and climate change adaptation.

The objective of this framework is to provide guidance for health systems and public health
programming to increase their capacity for protecting health in an unstable and changing
climate. By implementing the 10 key components laid out in this framework, health
organizations, authorities and programmes will be better able to anticipate, prevent, prepare
for and manage climate-related health risks. Least developed countries and countries in the
process of developing the health components of National Adaptation Plans (NAPs) under
the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) may find this document
particularly useful in their efforts to design a comprehensive response to the risks presented
by short-term climate variability and long-term climate change.

Public Health & Environment Department (PHE)


Health Security & Environment Cluster (HSE)
World Health Organization (WHO)
Avenue Appia 20 – CH-1211 Geneva 27 – Switzerland
www.who.int/phe/en/
http://www.who.int/globalchange/en/
E-mail: [email protected]

You might also like