AVX Lawsuit
AVX Lawsuit
AVX Lawsuit
assessed against AVX pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 6038B for its failure to timely file
Gain Recognition Agreements (“GRA”) and GRA Annual Certifications, for the tax
years ending March 31, 2012, March 31, 2013, and March 31, 2014.
1
6:20-cv-01244-TMC Date Filed 04/01/20 Entry Number 1 Page 2 of 15
THE PARTIES
§ 1402(a)(1) because AVX’s principal place of business and its principal office are
located at 1 AVX Boulevard, Fountain Inn, South Carolina 29644, which is within
§ 7422(a) because on or about May 6, 2019, AVX timely filed claims for refund
with the IRS, on IRS Form 843, requesting a refund of its $600,000 tax overpayment
which, on or about March 26, 2018, the IRS erroneously seized and credited against
the $600,000 in penalties the IRS erroneously assessed. See Exhibit 1 (with
2
6:20-cv-01244-TMC Date Filed 04/01/20 Entry Number 1 Page 3 of 15
January 22, 2020, the IRS allowed $100,000 of AVX’s refund claim, but disallowed
10. AVX owns, directly and indirectly, several domestic and foreign
subsidiaries.
12. Elco Europe GmbH (“Elco”) is a German entity and is a wholly owned
subsidiary of AVX.
14. AVX and AVX Development, along with AVX’s other domestic
subsidiaries, are treated as an affiliated group for U.S. tax purposes and file
3
6:20-cv-01244-TMC Date Filed 04/01/20 Entry Number 1 Page 4 of 15
subsidiary, Elco, under the control of AVX CV. The reorganization plan
16. On March 8, 2012, pursuant to the Elco Reorganization Plan, AVX and
20. On March 12, 2012, pursuant to the Elco Reorganization Plan, AVX
21. Also on March 12, 2012, pursuant to the Elco Reorganization Plan,
AVX contributed 89.1% of Elco stock to AVX CV in exchange for AVX CV stock.
22. Also on March 12, 2012, pursuant to the Elco Reorganization Plan,
AVX CV stock.
4
6:20-cv-01244-TMC Date Filed 04/01/20 Entry Number 1 Page 5 of 15
owned 90% of Elco stock, and AVX and AVX Development owned 99% and 1% of
in exchange for AVX CV stock, made pursuant to the Elco Reorganization Plan,
solely in exchange for its stock, no gain or loss is recognized on the exchange so
long as the persons making the transfers remain in control of the transferee
a foreign corporation solely in exchange for its stock, recognition of gain may be
required even though the transaction would otherwise qualify for nonrecognition
under § 351.
person, including a corporation, will generally recognize taxable gain on the transfer
of stock to a foreign corporation unless the U.S. person enters into a five-year gain
5
6:20-cv-01244-TMC Date Filed 04/01/20 Entry Number 1 Page 6 of 15
28. A GRA requires the U.S. person to recognize gain on the transfer if
the GRA must be submitted to the IRS and GRA Annual Certifications must be
submitted to the IRS for five years thereafter. See 26 C.F.R. § 1.367(a)-8(d) and (g).
or a GRA Annual Certification to the IRS, then such person must recognize gain on
the transaction unless such person can demonstrate to the IRS that such failure was
not willful. See 26 C.F.R. § 1.367(a)-8(p)(1) (“[A] U.S. transferor whose failure to
file or failure to comply is determined not to be willful will not be subject to gain
recognition . . . .”).
31. Section 367 does not impose penalties for the failure to file a GRA or a
provide required information to the IRS are subject to a penalty of 10 percent of the
fair market value of the property at the time of the exchange. See 26 U.S.C. §
6038B(c).
6
6:20-cv-01244-TMC Date Filed 04/01/20 Entry Number 1 Page 7 of 15
34. Section 6038B limits the penalties that can be imposed for the failure
including corporations, must comply with the requirements of § 367 and its
See 26 C.F.R. § 1.6038B-1(b)(1)(i) (“[I]f the U.S. person files . . . a gain recognition
agreement under § 1.367(a)-8 . . . such person must comply in all material respects
with the requirements of such section pursuant to the terms of the . . . gain
6038B.”).
36. Thus, § 6038B penalties can be imposed for the failure to file required
and GRA Annual Certifications on behalf of its wholly owned subsidiaries. See 26
C.F.R. § 1.367(a)-8(d)(3) (“If the U.S. transferor is a member but not the common
parent of a consolidated group, the common parent of the consolidated group is the
agent for the U.S. transferor . . . Thus, the common parent must file the gain
7
6:20-cv-01244-TMC Date Filed 04/01/20 Entry Number 1 Page 8 of 15
file GRAs and GRA Annual Certifications for the transfers of Elco stock by AVX
39. AVX unintentionally failed to timely file the required GRAs and GRA
Annual Certifications.
40. In or about December 2015, the IRS advised AVX that it had not filed
41. On or about May 2, 2016, AVX filed the required GRAs and GRA
Annual Certifications.
42. On or about October 12, 2017, the IRS determined that AVX’s failure
to timely file GRAs and GRA Annual Certifications was not willful or due to
43. Because AVX’s failure to timely file GRAs and GRA Annual
Certifications was not willful, AVX is not required to recognize gain on the
44. Because the failure to timely file GRAs and GRA Annual Certifications
was not due to intentional disregard, and because the exchange of Elco stock for
8
6:20-cv-01244-TMC Date Filed 04/01/20 Entry Number 1 Page 9 of 15
6038B(c)(3) (limiting penalties for the failure to provide information “with respect
to any exchange” to $100,000 if such failure was not due to intentional disregard).
45. Ignoring the text of § 6038B(c)(3), which limits penalties with respect
to any exchange to $100,000, on or about October 12, 2017, the IRS assessed
penalties against AVX of $100,000 for each late filed GRA and GRA Annual
46. The specific penalties the IRS assessed against AVX are set forth in the
following chart:
47. On December 20, 2017, AVX submitted a written protest to the IRS
asserting that the IRS erroneously assessed the GRA and GRA Annual Certification
penalties.
9
6:20-cv-01244-TMC Date Filed 04/01/20 Entry Number 1 Page 10 of 15
48. The IRS failed to respond to AVX’s written protest and, on March 29,
2019, the IRS advised AVX that its protest “seems to have gotten lost somewhere
along the way.” See Exhibit 6 (email from IRS Revenue Agent J. Cheek).
49. Prior to considering AVX’s protest, on or about March 26, 2018, the
IRS seized $600,000 of a tax overpayment made by AVX for the tax year ended
March 31, 2017, and credited the seized amount to the erroneously assessed GRA
50. On May 6, 2019, AVX submitted claims for refund to the IRS seeking
a full refund of the $600,000 tax overpayment the IRS erroneously seized and
51. On or about January 22, 2020, the IRS granted $100,000 of AVX’s
52. On or about February 21, 2020, AVX received a refund check from the
COUNT I
10
6:20-cv-01244-TMC Date Filed 04/01/20 Entry Number 1 Page 11 of 15
54. Because AVX did not intentionally disregard its GRA and GRA Annual
Certification filing obligations, the maximum penalty the IRS can assess against
55. The exchange of Elco stock for AVX CV stock, made pursuant to the
§ 351.
56. Because the exchange of Elco stock for AVX CV stock constitutes a
single, integrated exchange, the maximum penalty that can be imposed against AVX
is $100,000.
58. The IRS previously refunded to AVX only $100,000 of the erroneously
COUNT II
(In the Alternative, Claim Under 26 U.S.C. § 7422 for Refund of $300,000)
11
6:20-cv-01244-TMC Date Filed 04/01/20 Entry Number 1 Page 12 of 15
61. Because AVX did not intentionally disregard its GRA and GRA Annual
Certification filing obligations, the maximum penalty the IRS can assess against
62. The exchange of Elco stock for AVX CV stock, made pursuant to the
§ 351.
63. In the alternative, if the exchange of Elco stock for AVX CV stock is
considered two separate exchanges – one by AVX and one by AVX Development –
the maximum penalty the IRS can assess against AVX under I.R.C. § 6038B is
$200,000.
65. The IRS previously refunded to AVX only $100,000 of the erroneously
(a) that the Court enter judgment in its favor and against the United States of
12
6:20-cv-01244-TMC Date Filed 04/01/20 Entry Number 1 Page 13 of 15
assessed and collected for the tax years ending March 31, 2012, March 31,
2013, and March 31, 2014, in the amount of $400,000, plus statutory
(b) that, in the alternative, the Court enter judgment in its favor and against the
penalties erroneously assessed and collected for the tax years ending
March 31, 2012, March 31, 2013, and March 31, 2014, in the amount of
(c) that the Court award Plaintiff such other and further relief as the Court
13
6:20-cv-01244-TMC Date Filed 04/01/20 Entry Number 1 Page 14 of 15
Respectfully submitted,
George B. Abney
Pro Hac Vice Application Pending
Georgia Bar No. 121676
Florida Bar No. 171557
Alston & Bird, LLP
One Atlantic Center
1201 W. Peachtree Street
Atlanta, Georgia 30309-3424
Direct: 404-881-7980
Fax: 404-253-8380
E-MAIL: [email protected]
April 1, 2020
14
6:20-cv-01244-TMC Date Filed 04/01/20 Entry Number 1 Page 15 of 15
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that on April 1, 2020, I filed the foregoing Complaint in AVX
Corporation v. United States with the Clerk of the Court via CM/ECF electronic
filing.
Copies of the Complaint and Summonses are being served upon the following
Charles Rettig
Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Internal Revenue Service
1500 Pennsylvania Avenue
Washington, D.C. 20003-3116
15