Case Rep Gastroenterol 2008;2:456–460 Published online: November 15, 2008 © 2008 S.

Karger AG, Basel 456

DOI: 10.1159/000129707 ISSN 1662–0631
www.karger.com/crg

Collision Tumor of the Stomach:

A Case of an Adenocarcinoma
and a Gastrointestinal Stromal
Tumor
D.L.M. Idemaa D. Daryanania L.M.T. Sterkb J.M. Klaasea
a
Department of Surgery, Medisch Spectrum Twente, and b Department of
Pathology, Enschede, The Netherlands

Key Words
Adenocarcinoma · Collision tumor · Gastrointestinal stromal cell tumor · Gastrointestinal
stromal tumor · Stomach

Abstract
A collision tumor of the stomach is a rare event. We report the case of a collision tumor
of the stomach consisting of an adenocarcinoma and a gastrointestinal stromal tumor
(GIST). This is, to our knowledge, the second report in the literature of such a case. A 71-
year-old man with abdominal discomfort underwent an esophagogastroduodenoscopy
which revealed a tumor of the oesophagogastric junction. A total gastrectomy was
performed. Histologic examination showed a mixed tumor consisting of a primary
adenocarcinoma and multiple nodules of GIST. The adenocarcinoma showed both diffuse
and intestinal growth, angio-invasion and metastasis to lymph nodes. The GIST tumor
cells were strongly immunoreactive to CD117 and CD34. Based on mitotic index, size and
cytonuclear details, the biological behavior of this GIST tumor was supposed to be
benign. This case reports the rare finding of a collision tumor consisting of an
adenocarcinoma and a GIST with an unknown etiology.

Introduction

Adenocarcinoma is the most common malignant gastric tumor, while gastrointestinal

stromal tumors (GISTs) are relatively rare [1]. From all gastrointestinal locations, GISTs
occur most frequently in the stomach (60–70%) [1]. However, a combination of an
adenocarcinoma and a GIST is a very rare finding and an actual collision of these tumors
even more so. This case report is, to our best knowledge, the second report in literature.

Joost M. Klaase, MD, PhD Department of Surgery, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Haaksbergerstraat 55
NL–7500 KA Enschede (The Netherlands)
Fax +31 53 487 2526, E-Mail [email protected]
 Case Rep Gastroenterol 2008;2:456–460 Published online: November 15, 2008 © 2008 S. Karger AG, Basel 457
DOI: 10.1159/000129707 ISSN 1662–0631
www.karger.com/crg

Case Report

Clinical Presentation

A 71-year-old man presented with vague abdominal discomfort. Physical examination was
unremarkable. Laboratory data demonstrated an ESR of 15 mm/h (normal 1–7 mm/h), a hemoglobin
level of 6.5 mmol/l (normal 8.5–11.0 mmol/l), thrombocytes 341 × 109 (normal 150–400 × 109),
leukocytes 8.9 × 109 (normal 4.0–10.0 × 109). Renal and liver function tests were normal.
Esophagogastroduodenoscopy revealed a tumor at the oesophagogastric junction from which biopsies
were taken. Histologic examination revealed an adenocarcinoma.
Chest X-ray did not show any signs of metastasis. Endosonography showed an irregular course of
the gastric wall where it was adjacent to the liver, not excluding possible invasive growth into the liver
and thus suggesting the possibility of a T4 carcinoma. Sonography of the neck region and the abdomen
showed no lymph node involvement or signs of metastasis to other organs. Primary surgery consisting
of a total gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y esophagojejunostomy was performed. Except from a
postoperative septic period as a result of a spondylodiscitis, which was successfully treated with
antibiotics, the patient was postoperatively discharged in clinically good condition after six weeks. Two
and a half years after the total gastrectomy the patient developed pleural effusion due to
adenocarcinoma metastases and died shortly thereafter.

Pathologic Findings

The resected specimen consisted of a totally resected stomach with en bloc part of the distal
oesophagus. Alongside the lesser curvature there was a tumor, measuring 5 × 4 × 2.5 cm. On cut section
the tumor invaded through the muscularis propria into the fat of the omentum minus. Microscopically
the tumor consisted of both a conventional adenocarcinoma and tumor nodules composed of cells with
another phenotype. Most of the adenocarcinoma was found in the submucosa, but focally the
adenocarcinoma invaded all layers of the gastric wall into the outer serosal surface or perigastric fat.
This tumor was composed of a combination of intestinal, gland-forming growth and a diffuse, poorly
adhesive, often signet-ring morphology. There was also angioinvasive growth. The proximal and distal
resection margins were free of tumor. Metastasis was found in 5 of the 8 resected lymph nodes.
The other tumor was found multifocal in the submucosa, muscularis propria and subserosa. It
consisted of nodules up to 6 mm composed of spindle cells with little cytonuclear polymorphism and
with no significant amount of mitosis (<5/50 HPF) (fig. 1a). These cells expressed high levels of CD117
(fig. 1b) and CD34, while other stromal cell markers like S100, smooth muscle actin and desmin were
not expressed. It was therefore concluded that these tumor nodules were GIST. Figure 1c shows the
actual ‘collision’ between the adenocarcinoma and the GIST.

Discussion

GISTs were first mentioned in 1983 by Mazur and Clark [2]. These tumors are the
most common mesenchymal tumors in the digestive tract and are thought to originate
either from the stem cells that differentiate towards interstitial cells of Cajal, or directly
from interstitial cells of Cajal [3, 4]. Small GISTs are often detected incidentally during
surgery for other reasons, or are detected during gastroscopy [1]. In general, GISTs can be
differentiated from other tumors made up from spindle cells and/or epitheloid cells by
expressing CD117 (c-kit) and CD34 in 50–80% of cases [3, 4]. The KIT gene codes for c-
kit protein which activates a tyrosine kinase after binding with a stem cell factor. 90% of
GISTs have a mutation in the KIT oncogene, but 10% miss this mutation [4]. These
sometimes CD117-negative tumors often have a mutation in the platelet-derived growth
factor receptor α (PDGFRα).
Nowadays, the prognosis and biological behaviour of GIST depends on a combination
of two criteria: the size of the tumor and the mitotic index [1]. Surgical resection is the
 Case Rep Gastroenterol 2008;2:456–460 Published online: November 15, 2008 © 2008 S. Karger AG, Basel 458
DOI: 10.1159/000129707 ISSN 1662–0631
www.karger.com/crg

primary treatment for GIST. Approximately 70–85% of patients have a complete

resection, but overall five-year survival is only 50%, because of the tendency of the GIST
to metastasize or to recur. Since 2002 a new therapy, imatinib mesylate, is developed to
treat this kind of malignancies when metastasized or irresectable. This is a tyrosine kinase
inhibitor and demonstrates dramatic effects in the majority of patients. 80% of patients
have either a response or stable disease with imatinib treatment [5].
After several years of treating patients with imatinib, resistance has developed.
Approximately 50% of patients do not respond after two years of treatment [6]. Possibly
the kind of KIT gene mutation has an effect on the development of resistance and the
tumor response on imatinib [4].
Collision tumors are defined as morphologically different neighboring neoplasms that
do not intermingle [7]. The development of gastric collision tumors is very rare. In the
English literature we found one case report describing the occurrence of an
adenocarcinoma mixed with a GIST [8]. Several cases describing various other
combinations of tumor have been reported [7, 9–11]. Various hypotheses have been
proposed about synchronous occurrence of GIST and adenocarcinoma. They considered
whether or not such an association was incidental or whether the two lesions were
connected by a causal relationship. Some articles suggest that gene mutations or a single
carcinogenic agent might interact with two neighboring tissues, inducing the
development of tumors of different histiotypes in the same organ, but no evidence of this
last hypothesis has yet been found [8, 10]. Both tumors have different precursor cells and
molecular make-up, and if there were a single carcinogen, these types of tumor would
probably be diagnosed more often.
In this case the diagnosis of GIST was made based on the tumor phenotype in
combination with immunoreactivity to CD117 and CD34. The GIST was presumed to be
benign due to the low mitotic count, size and to a lesser extent the low degree of
cellularity and cellular polymorphism. Although multicentricity is often considered a sign
of malignancy, in this case, only very small nodules with no histological signs of
malignant clinical behavior were present. Therefore it was expected that in this case the
prognosis would most probably be determined by the adenocarcinoma component as this
tumor penetrated the entire gastric wall into the serosa, had invaded blood vessels and
showed lymph node metastasis.

Conclusion

We present a patient suffering from a collision tumor consisting of an adenocarcinoma

originating from the gastric mucosa and a GIST that was presumed to behave in a benign
fashion. As shown by the adenocarcinoma metastasis in the pleural effusion and death
two and a half years after surgery, the patient’s prognosis was determined by the
adenocarcinoma component. Two primary tumors of the stomach are a rare event.
However, an actual collision of both an epithelial adenocarcinoma and a GIST is
exceedingly rare and as far as we know now, both with different and unknown etiology.
 Case Rep Gastroenterol 2008;2:456–460 Published online: November 15, 2008 © 2008 S. Karger AG, Basel 459
DOI: 10.1159/000129707 ISSN 1662–0631
www.karger.com/crg

Fig. 1. a Gastric wall: hematoxylin and eosin. Tumor nodule in relation to the muscularis propria. The
tumor cells are composed of spindle cells and partly storiform, show moderate cytonuclear
polymorphism without obvious mitoses or necrosis. M = Mucosa; T = tumor; MP = muscularis
propria. b Gastric wall: immonuhistochemistry. Gastrointestinal stromal tumor showing CD117
expression. Insert: Detail of tumor cells with the aspects described in figure 1. M = Mucosa; T = tumor;
MP = muscularis propria. c Gastric wall: hematoxylin and eosin. Collision of the infiltrating
adenocarcinoma originated from the gastric mucosa and the GIST. A = Adenocarcinoma; G = GIST;
C = calcification.
 Case Rep Gastroenterol 2008;2:456–460 Published online: November 15, 2008 © 2008 S. Karger AG, Basel 460
DOI: 10.1159/000129707 ISSN 1662–0631
www.karger.com/crg

References

1 Miettinen M, Lasota J: Gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Review on morphology,

molecular pathology, prognosis and differential diagnosis. Arch Pathol Lab Med
2006;130:1466–1478.
2 Mazur MT, Clark HB: Gastric stromal tumors: reappraisal of histogenesis. Am J
Surg Pathol 1983;7:507–519.
3 Miettinen M, Sarlomo-Rikala M, Lasota J: Gastrointestinal stromal tumors:
Recent advances in understanding of their biology. Hum Pathol 1999;30:1213–
1220.
4 Van der Zwan SM, DeMatteo RP: Gastrointestinal stromal tumor: 5 years later.
Cancer 2005;104:1781–1788.
5 Verweij J, Van Oosterom A, Blay JY, et al: Imatinib mesylate (STI-571 Glivec쏐,
GleevecTM) is an active agent for gastrointestinal stromal tumors, but does not
yield responses in other soft-tissue sarcomas that are unselected for a molecular
target: Results from an EORTC Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group phase II
study. Eur J Cancer 2003;39:2006–2011.
6 Demetri GD, Von Mehren M, Blanke CD, et al: Efficacy and safety of imatinib
mesylate in advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors. New Engl J Med
2002;347:472–480.
7 Klaase JM, Hulscher JBF, Offerhaus GJA, et al: Surgery for unusual
histopathologic variants of esophageal neoplasms: A report of 23 cases with
emphasis of histopathologic characteristics. Ann Surg Oncol 2003;10:261–267.
8 Liu SW, Chen GH, Hsieh PP: Collision tumor of the stomach. A case report of
mixed gastrointestinal stromal tumor and adenocarcinoma. J Clin Gastroenterol
2002;34:332–334.
9 Bircan S, Candir O, Aydin S, et al: Synchronous primary adenocarcinoma and
gastrointestinal stromal tumor in the stomach: A report of two cases. Turk J
Gastroenterol 2004;15:187–191.
10 Maiorana A, Fante R, Cesinaro AM, Fano RA: Synchronous occurrence of
epithelial and stromal tumors in the stomach. A report of 6 cases. Arch Pathol Lab
Med 2000;124:682–686.
11 Sailors JL, French SW: The unique simultaneous occurrence of granular cell
tumor, gastrointestinal stromal tumor, and gastric adenocarcinoma. Arch Pathol
Lab Med 2005;129:e121–e123.