The Lesson of The Kaibab

Download as doc, pdf, or txt
Download as doc, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 4
At a glance
Powered by AI
The document discusses how the Kaibab deer population on the plateau in Arizona dramatically increased after predators were removed, but then crashed as the population exceeded the carrying capacity of the land.

The Forest Service banned all hunting and tried to exterminate the predators of the deer, including mountain lions, wolves, coyotes and bobcats between 1907 and 1939.

Even though predators were eliminated, the deer population had grown so large by 1925 that overgrazing caused the food sources to be depleted, leading to a population decline.

The Lesson of the Kaibab

Introduction: The environment may be


altered by forces within the biotic
community, as well as by relationships
between organisms and the physical
environment. The carrying capacity of an
ecosystem is the maximum number of
organisms that an area can support on a
sustained basis. The density of a population
may produce such profound changes in the
environment that the environment becomes unsuitable for the survival
of that species. For instance, overgrazing of land may make the land
unable to support the grazing of animals that lived there.

Objectives:

 Graph data on the Kaibab deer population of Arizona from 1905


to 1939
 Determine factors responsible for the changing populations
 Determine the carrying capacity of the Kaibab Plateau

Background

Before 1905, the deer on the Kaibab Plateau were estimated to


number about 4000. The average carrying capacity of the range was
then estimated to be about 30,000 deer. On November 28th, 1906,
President Theodore Roosevelt created the Grand Canyon National
Game Preserve to protect the "finest deer herd in America."

Unfortunately, by this time the Kaibab forest area had already been
overgrazed by sheep, cattle, and horses. Most of the tall grasses had
been eliminated. The first step to protect the deer was to ban all
hunting. In addition, in 1907, The Forest Service tried to exterminate
the predators of the deer. Between 1907 and 1939, 816 mountain
lions, 20 wolves, 7388 coyotes and more than 500 bobcats were killed.

Signs that the deer population was out of control began to appear as
early as 1920 - the range was beginning to deteriorate rapidly. The
Forest Service reduced the number of livestock grazing permits. By
1923, the deer were reported to be on the verge of starvation and the
range conditions were described as "deplorable."
The Kaibab Deer Investigating Committee recommended that all
livestock not owned by local residents be removed immediately from
the range and that the number of deer be cut in half as quickly as
possible.
DATA TABLE
Hunting
was Year Deer Population
reopened,
1905 4,000
and during
the fall of 1910 9,000
1924, 675
deer were 1915 25,000
killed by 1920 65,000
hunters.
However, 1924 100,000
these deer 1925 60,000
represented
only one- 1926 40,000
tenth the 1927 37,000
number of
deer that 1928 35,000
had been 1929 30,000
born that
spring. 1930 25,000
Over the 1931 20,000
next two
winters, it 1935 18,000
is estimated 1939 10,000
that 60,000
deer starved to death.

Today, the Arizona Game Commission carefully manages the Kaibab


area with regulations geared to specific local needs. Hunting permits
are issued to keep the deer in balance with their range. Predators are
protected to help keep herds in balance with food supplies. Tragic
winter losses can be checked by keeping the number of deer near the
carrying capacity of the range.
1. Graph the deer population data. Place time on the X axis
and "number of deer" on the Y axis.

Analysis

1. During 1906 and 1907, what two methods did the Forest Service use to
protect the Kaibab deer?
2. Were these methods successful? Use the data from your graph to
support your answer.

3. Why do you suppose the population of deer declined in 1925, although


the eliminationof predators occurred?

4. Why do you think the deer population size in 1900 was 4,000 when it is
estimated that the plateau has a carrying capacity of 30,000?

5. Based on these lessons, suggest what YOU would have done in the
following years to manage deer herds.

1915:

1926:

6. It is a criticism of many population ecologists that the pattern of


population increase and subsequent crash of the deer population would
have occurred even if the bounty had not been placed on the predators.
Do you agree or disagree with this statement. Explain your reasoning.

7. What future management plans would you suggest for the Kaibab deer
herd?

You might also like