Oral Medicine and Pathology � Helicobacter pylori

Helicobacter pylori in the dental plaque:

Is it of diagnostic value for gastric infection?

Mohammad Taghi Chitsazi 1, Ebrahim Fattahi 2, Ramin Mostofi Zadeh Farahani 3, Shirin Fattahi 3

(1) (DDS,MSc), Assistant professor, Department of periodontics, School of Dentistry, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences
(2) (MD), Associate professor, Department of Endocrinology, School of Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences
(3) (DDS), School of Dentistry, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences. Tabriz, Iran

Correspondence:
Dr. Mohammad Taghi Chitsazi
School of Dentistry,
Tabriz University of Medical Sciences.
Tabriz, Iran. Chitsazi MT, Fattahi E, Farahani RMZ, Fattahi S. Helicobacter pylori
E-mail: [email protected] in the dental plaque: Is it of diagnostic value for gastric infection?. Med
Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2006;11:E325-8.
© Medicina Oral S. L. C.I.F. B 96689336 - ISSN 1698-6946

Received: 8-01-2006
Accepted: 25-02-2006

Indexed in:
-Index Medicus / MEDLINE / PubMed
-EMBASE, Excerpta Medica
-Indice Médico Español
-IBECS

ABSTRACT
Aim: The aim of the present study was the assessment of association of helicobacter pylori of dental plaque and stomach
in a more homogenous population and also to determine the diagnostic value of dental plaque for gastric infection.
Materials and Methods: Based on the results of Rapid urease test (RUT) on specimens from gastric antrum, 88 patients
with symptoms of dyspepsia were assigned into two groups of infected and non-infected with helicobacter pylori. Su-
pragingival plaque samples were collected from mandibular first and second molar area using and sterile curette and
were investigated using RUT. Statistical analysis of data was performed using chi-square test and independent t-test.
Results: H.pylori was detected in 34.1 % of dental plaque specimens. The prevalence of helicobacter pylori infection
in dental was 31.8 % and 36.4 % in patients with and without gastric infection (P=0.6). Also the interaction of age and
infection was not significant but the prevalence of H. pylori both in the dental plaque and the stomach of male patients
was higher than female patients.
Conclusion: there is not any significant association between the helicobacter pylori of the dental plaque and the stomach.
Also the dental plaque can not be used as a primary diagnostic aid for gastric infection.

Key words: Helicobacter pylori, dental plaque, rapid urease test.

INTRODUCTION imposed to the health systems by the disease. By the same

Helicobacter pylori infection is considered as one of the token, early diagnostic approaches which are accessible and
most prevalent infectious diseases throughout the world; the less expensive would be highly beneficial.
carriage rate of Helicobacter pylori is reported to be 20-80% Dental plaque is a soft gelatinous mass adhering to the
for adults in the developed world, and more than 90% in the tooth surface and other hard surfaces and comprising of
developing world (1). This infection has a central role in the bacteria embedded in an organic matrix. After isolation of
development and progress of peptic ulcers (2,3). It has also helicobacter pylori form dental plaque, controversies regar-
been correlated with gastric cancer (4,5). After the discovery ding the existence of this bacterium in the dental plaque
of this association, the recurrence rate of peptic ulcers, -as a probable secondary reservoir for it – have been never
which was 80% formerly, has declined to 20% (6). Taken ceased (7-9). While the presence of helicobacter pylori in
together, early detection and eradication of this bacterium dental plaque was a common finding in some studies (10-
would be helpful either in the prevention or the treatment 13), it was not detected in others as frequently (14,15); the
of peptic ulcers and also in reducing the economical burden latter correlate the residence of the bacterium in the oral

E325
© Medicina Oral S.L. Email: [email protected] © Medicina Oral S.L. Email: [email protected]
 Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2006;11:E325-8. Helicobacter pylori

cavity with gastroesophagal reflux (16,17). Co-existence of second molar area using and sterile curette and were inves-
helicobacter pylori in the dental plaque and the stomach is tigated using RUT as mentioned previously. The examiner
also a matter of debate (18,19). Although this coincidence was unaware of the grouping of the samples.
has been reported by some authors (20,21), other researchers Statistical analysis
did not find any association between these two potential All figures were expressed as mean ± SD (Standard de-
sources of the bacterium (22,23). The issue still remains a viation). Chi-square test was employed for the analysis
question today. Is there any relationship between helicobac- of detection frequency of Helicobacter pylori in dental
ter pylori of dental plaque and gastric infection? If any, is plaque of patients with and without gastric infection; and
it of diagnostic value for the clinician? the association of sex with the results of RUT in the dental
One of the factors aggravating the present relative lack plaque and the stomach. Independent t-test was used for the
of agreement among the researchers is the lack of strict analysis of the association of the age with the results of RUT
criteria in selecting study population, design of the study test of the dental plaque and stomach. In the present study
and collection of the specimens. For instance, despite the P<0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance.
interaction of cariogenic bacteria with helicobacter pylori
(24), caries status of study population has not been taken RESULTS
into account in the design of previous studies. The aim of A total of 88 patients with a mean age of 34.9(SD: 11.23)
the present study was the assessment of association of two participated in this study. Of these patients, 52 were male
potential sources of helicobacter pylori, namely stomach and 36 were female. The mean age of patients was 34.9 (SD:
and dental plaque in a more homogenous study design by 11.23). H.pylori was detected in 34.1% of dental plaque
eliminating some of the most important confounding factors specimens (30 patients).
which could affect the results of the study enormously. Also Table 1 shows the prevalence of H.pylori in the dental
we investigated whether helicobacter pylori of dental plaque plaque of patients with and without gastric infection. The
can be of value in the diagnosis of gastric infection. association of H.pylori infection of stomach and simulta-
neous existence of this bacterium in the dental plaque was
METHODS AND MATERIALS not significant (P=0.6).
Study population The prevalence of with H.pylori both in the dental plaque
Present study was conducted at the departments of en- and the stomach of male patients was higher than female
docrinology and periodontology at Tabriz University of patients (dental plaque: χ2=3.8, P=0.04 stomach: χ2=4.8,
Medical Sciences. The study population was comprised of P=0.03). While 31 male patient had stomach infection, only
the patients referring to the department of endocrinology 13 female patients were infected. Also 22 male and 8 female
with a complaint of dyspepsia. All of the selected patients patients had helicobacter pylori in the dental plaque. Eight
were non-smokers. A history of the following confounding patients demonstrated simultaneous existence of helicobac-
factors was ruled out in patients as an important step toward ter pylori in stomach and dental plaque.
achievement of a more homogenous study population: pre- There was not any significant interaction of age and the infec-
vious treatment of peptic ulcer, cancer, antibiotic therapy tion in the stomach and the dental plaque (P=0.7 for both).
or the use of oral antibacterial mouth rinse for any reason
during the past year, surgical and non-surgical periodon- Table 1. The association of helicobacter pylori infection of the dental
tal therapy since a year ago, signs of active periodontal plaque and the stomach.
disease, severe dental caries or recent use of proton pump Infection
inhibitors and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. The Infected Non-infected
Sex of dental Total
stomach stomach
last two factors are important since potential interactions plaque
of dental and periodontal pathogens with H. pylori could
13 17 30
act as a source of bias. Male Negative
69.9% 54.8% 57.7%
Grouping and laboratory procedures
Endoscopic survey of stomach was performed. Biopsy 8 14 22
Male Positive
38.1% 45.2% 42.3%
specimens were taken from the gastric antrum at a distance
of 2cm from pyloric canal in order to retain site specifity. Total
21 31 52
Samples were examined using rapid urease test (RUT) for 100% 100% 100%
the detection of H. pylori. Those samples showing a color 15 13 28
change from yellow to red within an hour were considered Female Negative
65.2% 100% 77.8%
to be positive for H. pylori infection. 8 0 8
Based on the results of RUT, subjects were divided into two Female Positive
34.8% 0% 22.2%
groups (a group with gastric infection and another group
without infection, each consisting of 44 patients). For the 23 13 36
Total
100% 100% 100%
detection of H. pylori in the dental plaque, supragingival
plaque samples were collected from mandibular first and The first figure in each cell shows the number of patients with the asso-
ciated characteristic and the second one demonstrates the percentage.

E326
© Medicina Oral S.L. Email: [email protected]
Oral Medicine and Pathology � Helicobacter pylori

DISCUSSION contributing to the growth of bacteria in the oral cavity

The findings of the present study show that there is not and possible interactions of this bacterium with indigenous
any association between H.pylori of dental plaque and bacteria of oral cavity should be investigated. The investi-
stomach as two potential and important sources of this gation of serotypic similarity of H.pylori in dental plaque
microorganism. While 31.8% of patients with H.pylori and stomach is also of vital importance.
infection of the stomach demonstrated the microorganism
in the dental plaque, 36.4% of patients not affected by the CONCLUSION
stomach infection were found to have the microorganism in In conclusion, the results of present study with a relatively
the dental plaque. There was not any statistical difference homogenous study population and study design shows that
between these two groups (p=0.6). there is not any association between H.pylori in dental pla-
In several studies there was not any association between que and stomach. Also it seems that the presence of H.pylori
H.pylori infection of dental plaque and stomach (19,22,23). is not of any diagnostic value for gastric infection.
Some authors believe that H.pylori should be categorized
as the normal microflora of the oral cavity (25,26), while REFERENCES
others suggest that the existence of this microorganism in 1. Taylor DN, Blaser MJ. The epidemiology of Helicobacter pylori infec-
oral cavity is temporary and could be related to the occu- tion. Epidemiol Rev 1991;13:42-59.
2. Lee A, Fox J, Hazell S. Pathogenecity of Helicobacter pylori: a perspec-
pational exposure to the bacterium (27,28). The results of tive. Infect Immune 1993;61:1601-10.
aforementioned surveys are in agreement with the finding 3. Dixon MF. Helicobacter Pylori and peptic ulceration: Histopathological
of the present study that demonstrated low prevalence of aspects. J Gastroenetrol hepatol 1991;6:125-30.
helicobacter pylori in the dental plaque. Some researches 4. Forman D, Newell DG, Fullerton F. Association between infection with
Helicobacter pylori and risk of gastric cancer: evidence from a prospective
insist on the positive association of H.pylori in the dental investigation. BMJ 1991;302:1302-5.
plaque and the stomach (20,21). We did not find such a 5. Parsonnet J, Vandersteen D, Goates J, Sibley RK, Pritikin J, Chang Y.
strong association in our study population. Some resear- Helicobacter pylori infection in intestinal- and diffuse-type gastric adeno-
chers believe in the lack of such an association (22,23). This carcinomas. J Natl Cancer Inst 1991;302:1302-5.
6. Catherine M. Dental implications of helicobacter pylori. J Can Dent
discrepancy may reflect the difference in study method and Assoc 2002;68:489-93.
study population. 7. Checchi L, Felice P, Acciardi C, Ricci C, Gatta L, Polacci R, et al.
Another finding of this study was the higher prevalence of Absence of Helicobacter pylori in dental plaque assessed by stool test. Am
H.pylori infection both in the dental plaque and the stomach J Gastroenterol 2000;95:3005-6.
8. Mazumder DN, Ghoshal UC. Dental plaque as reservoir, and deter-
in male subjects. Similar findings, showing higher and more minants of pathogenic potential of Helicobacter pylori: the controversy
consistent prevalence of helicobacter pylori infection in remains. Indian J Gastroenterol 1998;17:123-5.
male sex, have been reported previously (29). This issue has 9. Siddiq M, Haseeb UR, Mahmood A. Evidence of Helicobacter pylori
several potential implications. It has been suggested that the infection in dental plaque and gastric mucosa. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak
2004;14:205-7.
existence of H.pylori in dental plaque is temporary and that 10. Hu W, Cao C, Meng H. Helicobacter pylori in dental plaque of pe-
it could be related to the gastroesophageal reflux (16,17). riodontitis and gastric disease patients. Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za
They believe that oral cavity is not a primary source of this Zhi 1999;34:49-51.
bacterium. Since gastroesophageal reflux is more prevalent 11. Nguyen AM, Engstrand L, Genta RM, Graham DY, el-Zaatari FA.
Detection of Helicobacter pylori in dental plaque by reverse transcription-
in female sex (30), it can not explain the male dominant polymerase chain reaction. J Clin Microbiol 1993;31:783-7.
pattern of helicobacter pylori infection observed in the 12. Song Q, Lange T, Spahr A, Adler G, Bode G. Characteristic distribu-
present study. However, smoking (31), social contacts and tion pattern of Helicobacter pylori in dental plaque and saliva detected
occupational exposure to the bacterium, all of which are with nested PCR. J Med Microbiol 2000;49:349-53.
13. Yang HT. Nested-polymerase chain reaction in detection of He-
associated with high risk of helicobacter pylori infection, licobacter pylori in human dental plaque. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi
are found more in men in the developing countries. A fact 1993;73:750-2, 774.
that is concordant with the results of the present study. 14. Bickley J, Owen RJ, Fraser AG, Pounder RE. Evaluation of the po-
Several factors are involved in partial lack of agreement lymerase chain reaction for detecting the urease C gene of Helicobacter
pylori in gastric biopsy samples and dental plaque. J Med Microbiol
between the results of different researchers. Strict criteria 1993;39:338-44.
in study design and population selection, collection of 15. Hardo PG, Tugnait A, Hassan F. Helicobacter pylori infection and
specimen, utilized tests, different blood groups (32), serum dental care. Gut 1995;37:44-6.
lipid profile (33) and maturation stage of dental plaque 16. Savoldi E, Marinone MG, Negrini R, Facchinetti D, Lanzini A, Sapelli
PL. Absence of Helicobacter pylori in dental plaque determined by im-
–which affects its lipid content and also potential bacterial munoperoxidase. Helicobacter 1998;3:283-7.
interactions- and active periodontal diseases (34), are among 17. Mattana CM, Vega AE, Flores G, de Domeniconi AG, de Centorbi
these factors. In this study we minimized the effects of these ON. Isolation of Helicobacter pylori from dental plaque. Rev Argent
confounding factors. However, there are other issues that Microbiol 1998;30:93-5.
18. Ogunbodede EO, Lawal OO, Lamikanra A, Okeke IN, Rotimi O, Ras-
should be meticulously considered while conducting any heed AA. Helicobacter pylori in the dental plaque and gastric mucosa of
study of this kind. The number of bacteria for maintenance dyspeptic Nigerian patients. Trop Gastroenterol 2002;923:127-33.
of active infection is not known yet. Also further studies are 19. Sahin FI, Tinaz AC, Simsek IS, Menevse S, Gorgul A. Detection of
needed to determine whether the presence of the bacteria Helicobacter pylori in dental plaque and gastric biopsy samples of Turkish
patients by PCR-RFLP. Acta Gastroenterol Belg 2001;64:150-2.
in oral cavity is permanent or not. Moreover, local factors

E327
© Medicina Oral S.L. Email: [email protected]
 Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2006;11:E325-8. Helicobacter pylori

20. Butt AK, Khan AA, Khan AA, Izhar M, Alam A, Shah SW, et al.
Correlation of Helicobacter pylori in dental plaque and gastric mucosa
of dyspeptic patients. J Pak Med Assoc 2002;52:196-200.
21. Cellini L, Allocati N, Piattelli A, Petrelli I, Fanci P, Dainelli B. Micro-
biological evidence of Helicobacter pylori from dental plaque in dyspeptic
patients. New Microbiol 1995;18:187-92.
22. Cammarota G, Tursi A, Montalto M, Papa A, Veneto G, Bernardi
S, et al. Role of dental plaque in the transmission of Helicobacter pylori
infection. J Clin Gastroenterol 1996;22:174-7.
23. Cheng LH, Webberley M, Evans M, Hanson N, Brown R. Helicobac-
ter pylori in dental plaque and gastric mucosa. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral
Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1996;81:421-3.
24. Okuda K, Ishihara K, Miura T, Katakura A, Noma H, Ebihara Y.
Helicobacter pylori may have only a transient presence in the oral cavity
and on the surface of oral cancer. Microbiol Immunol 2000;44:385-8.
25. Shankaran K, Desai HG. Helicobacter pylori in dental plaque. J Clin
Gastroenterol 1995;21:82-4.
26. Song Q, Lange T, Spahr A, Adler G, Bode G. Characteristic distribu-
tion pattern of Helicobacter pylori in dental plaque and saliva detected
with nested PCR. J Med Microbiol 2000;49:349-53.
27. Kamat AH, Mehta PR, Natu AA, Phadke AY, Vora IM, Desai PD, et
al. Dental plaque: an unlikely reservoir of Helicobacter pylori. Indian J
Gastroenterol 1998;17:138-40.
28. Santamaria MJ, Varea C, V, Munoz Almagro MC. Dental plaque in
Helicobacter pylori infection. An Esp Pediatr 1999;50:244-6.
29. Replogle ML, Glaser SL, Hiatt RA, Parsonnet J. Biologic sex as a
risk factor for Helicobacter pylori infection in healthy young adults. Am
J Epidemiol 1995;15:56-63.
30. de Oliveira SS, dos Santos Ida S, da Silva JF, Machado EC. Gastro-
esophageal reflux disease: prevalence and associated factors. Arq Gastro-
enterol 2005;42:116-21.
31. Cardenas VM, Graham DY. Smoking and Helicobacter pylori infection
in a sample of U.S. adults. Epidemiology 2005;16:586-90.
32. Kanbay M, Gur G, Arslan H, Yilmaz U, Boyacioglu S. The relation-
ship of ABO blood group, age, gender, smoking, and Helicobacter pylori
infection. Dig Dis Sci 2005;50:1214-7.
33. Trampenau C, Muller KD. Affinity of Helicobacter pylori to cholesterol
and other steroids. Microbes Infect 2003;5:13-7.
34. Dye BA, Kruszon-Moran D, McQuillan G. The relationship between
periodontal disease attributes and Helicobacter pylori infection among
adults in the United States. Am J Public Health 2002;92:1809-15.

E328
© Medicina Oral S.L. Email: [email protected]