Is 14593 - 2013

(Reaffirmed 2015)
SUPPLIED BY Book Supply Bureau UNDER THE LICENSE FROM BIS FOR RESEARCH DESIGNS & STANDARDS ORGANISATION (RDSO) - LUCKNOW ON 1/8/2006 2:07:07 AM (10.100.117.113) valid uptp 8/13/2019
ON 1/8/2006 2:07:07 AM (10.100.117
y Bureau UNDER THE LICENSE FROM BIS FOR RESEARCH DESIGNS & STANDARDS ORGANISATION (RDSO) - LUCKNOW
(Reaffirmed 2014)
(Reaffirmed 2018)

( Reaffirmed 2003 )
(Reaffirmed 2013)
(Reaffirmed 2012)
(Reaffirmed 2011)
DESIGNANDCONSTRUCTIONOFBORED (Reaffirmed 2010)
CAST-IN-SITU PILESFOUNDEDONROCKS-
GUIDELINES (Reaffirmed 2009)
(Reaffirmed 2008)
ICS 93.020

(Reaffirmed 2007)
(Reaffirmed 2006)
(Reaffirmed 2005)
0 BIS 1998
BUREAU OF INDIAN STANDARDS

MANAK BHAVAN, 9 BAHADUR SHAH ZAFAR MARG
NEW DELHI 110002
September 1998
Price Group 5
y Bureau UNDER THE LICENSE FROM BIS FOR RESEARCH DESIGNS & STANDARDS ORGANISATION (RDSO) - LUCKNOW ON 1/8/2006 2:07:07 AM (10.100.117
Rock Mechanics Sectional Committee, CED 48
FOREWORD
This Indian Standard was adopted by the Bureau of Indian Standards, after the draft finalized by the Rock
Mechanics Sectional Committee had been approved by the Civil Engineering Division Council.
Pile foundations provide an effective means of transmitting large concentrated loads through overburden soils
to underlying rock or socketed into rock. Bored cast-in-situ piles has the advantages of increasing the load
carrying capacity by socketing the pile into rock. However the load transfer mechanism or distribution of load
support of socketed pile is still in the development stage and depends upon the substrata condition and the type
of rock modulus of rock, strength and unfavourable condition of rock. The rock material can vary from hard,
fresh bed rock stronger than concrete, to highly weathered rock with properties of hard clay. Rock socketed piles
derive their load carrying capacity from two components’ shearing resistance at the concrete-rock interface
around the vertical cylindrical surface of the socket and end hearing resistance at the pile tip. There are several
factors which control the load carrying capacity of rock socketed pile, like quality and strength of rock, efficiency
of the load transfer mechanisms between the concrete pile and its rock socket.
Construction of such rock socketed piles requires careful choice of method of construction including effective
cleaning of the socket portion. As the techniques for measurements of the rock mass properties of foliated/jointed
rock are not well developed, the mechanisms for side resistance and base resistance in rocks exhibif complex
differences from those relevant to soils. Therefore, a separate standard covering bored cast-in-situ piles socketed
into rock has been formulated for design, construction, and interpretation of test results.
The information from various international practices, designers, executing agencies, construction agencies being
practiced in this country and the technical discussions thereon, including the available literature and considerable
assistance from National Thermal Power Corporation Ltd have assisted in the preparation of this standard. It
has been decided to use the standard as guidelines initially, before adopting this standard as a code of practice.
Technical Committee responsible for the formulation of this standard is given in Annex A.
In reporting the result of a test or analysis made in accordance with this standard, if the final value, observed or
calculated, is to be rounded off, it shall be done in accordance with IS 2 : 1960 ‘Rules for rounding off numerical
values (revised)‘.
IS 14593 : 1998
Indian Standard
DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF BORED

CAST-IN-SITU PILES FOUNDED ON ROCKS -
GUIDELINES
1 SCOPE IS No. Title
This standard covers the design of load bearing 12070 : 1987 Code of practice for design and con-
concrete bored cast-in-situ piles of diameter less than struction of shallow foundations on
or equal to 1 500 mm which transmit the load of the rocks
structure to the rock through resistance developed 13063: 1991 Code of practice for structural
either at the pile tip by end bearing or along the safety of buildings on shallow foun-
interface surface by pile rock adhesion or through dation in rocks
both.
3 TERMINOLOGY
This standard does not cover well foundations.
2 RRFERRNCRS For the purpose of this standard, the definition of terms
given in IS 2@l9 and IS 11358 shall be applicable in
The Indian Standards given below contain provisions
addition to the following.
which through reference in this text, constitute
provision of this standard. At the time of publication, 3.1 Rock Socket
the editions indicated were valid. All standards are
That portion of pile shaft which penetrates into a rot&
subject to revision, and parties to agreements based on
formation beneath the overburden.
this standard are encouraged to investigate the
possibility of applying the most recent editions of the 4 NECESSARY INFORMATION
standards indicated below:
4.1 For the satisfactory design and construction of
IS No. Title bored cast-in-situ piles in rock, the following
information is necessary :
456 : 1978 Code of practice for plain and rein-
forced concrete (third revision) 3 Information as per IS 2911 (Part l/Set 2).
1892 : 1979 Code of practice for subsurface b) Geotechnical investigation data as laid down
investigation for foundation as per IS 1892, IS 13063 or any other relevant
2131 : 1981 Method of standard penetration test IS code.
for soils (tier revision) cl The rock profile, contours, the geological data
2809 : 1972 Glossary of terms and symbols and the necessary information as listed in
relating to soil engineering IS 13063 along with the engineering and
2911 Code of practice for design and con- physical. properties of the rock strata/mass.
struction of pile foundations. 4 Information of rock below the anticipated level
(Part I/ Concrete piles of pile tip, generally not less than 5 m in
see 1 to3): 1979 bed-rock or more if otherwise.
(Part 4) : 1985 Load test on piles (first revision) e) In case of bridge on pile foundations data on
465 1 Code of practice for planning and high flood level, maximum scouring depth,
(Part 4) : 1989 design of ports and h&ours: Part 4 normal water level during working season, etc.
General design consideration f) In case of marine construction necessary infor-
(second revision) mation as per IS 465 1 (Part 4).
8009 Code of practice for calculation of a) Results of chemical tests to ascertain the
settlement of foundations: chemical constituents like chlorides, sulphates,
(Part 1) : 1976 Shallow foundations subjected to alkali and/or any other deleterious chemical
symmetrical static vertical loads content of soil/rock and ground water.
(Part 2) : 1980 Deep foundations subjected to 5 EQUIPMENT AND ACCESSORIES
symmetrical static vertical loading
The equipment and accessories would depend upon
11358 : 1987 Glossary of terms and symbols
the type of subsoil strata, ground water conditions, the
relating to rock mechanics
1
IS 14593: 1998
type of rock/founding material and the required depth and/or functional distress. The pile shaft should have
of embedment therein whichever applicable. Among adequate structural capacity to withstand all loads
the commonly used plants, tools and accessories, there (vertical, compression or uplift and moments which
exists a large variety of suitability on the subsoil and are transmitted to the rock mass).
rock type conditions and manner of operations, etc.
6.2 The various factors to be considered during *
5.1 Boring design are as per IS 12070.
Boring operations are generally done by rotary or 6.3 Loading on Piles

percussion type drilling rigs using direct mud
6.3.1 Depending on the nature of the superstructure,
circulation or reverse mud circulation methods to
the loads can form any combination of axial forces
bring the cuttings out. Bailer and Chisel method if
(either compressive or tensile), lateral forces and
employed should be used with caution to avoid the
moments. The various load combinations of dead
effect of suction. Over cutting especially at the change
load, live load, wind load, earthquake load and uplift
of strata should be done with caution.
load to be considered should satisfy the requirements
5.2 Chiseling of IS 456.
Chiseling may be resorted to in rock strata to penetrate 63.2 The overburden soil may exert negative skin
up to required depth. friction on pile shaft resting on rock. This should be
accounted for in design of piles.
5.3 Cutting Tool
6.4 The load carrying capacity of a pile is dependent
The size of the cutting tool should not be less than the
on the properties of the rock in which it is embedded/
diameter of the pile by more than 75 mm.
socketed. Axial load from a pile is normally
5.4 Drilling Mud transmitted to the rock through adhesion at the
interface of pile and rock and end bearing at the pile
Use of drilling mud in stabilizing sides of boreholes is
tip.
also made where appropriate or necessary. Drilling
mud should satisfy the basic properties as defined in 6.4.1 A single pile is normally designed to carry load
IS 2911 (Part l/Set 2). along its axis. The horizontal load on a vertical pile is
transmitted to the subsoil primarily by horizontal
5.5 Cleaning subgrade reaction generated in the upper part of the
Proper cleaning of piles after boring, after lowering the shaft. Transverse load bearing capacity of a single pile
reinforcement and before concreting shall be done. depends on the soil reaction developed and the
On completion of pile bore up to required depth, the structural capacity of the shaft under bending.
bottom of pile bore shall be cleaned to remove rock 6.4.2 The permissible load carrying capacity of pile
debris, pile bore soil, etc. Rope operated grabbing or may be estimated using the proposed methods.
kelly mounted hydraulically operated grab can be However, it should be confirmed by an initial load test
used. Use of air lift technique is also effective in
on trial pile IS 2911 (Part 4).
removing the rock debris.
6.4.3 The settlement of pile obtained at safe load from
5.6 Liner load test results on a single pile shall not be directly
Permanent liner may be used to avoid the aggressive used in forecasting the settlement of a structure unless
action of ground water or otherwise. In case, liner is experience from similar foundations on its settlement
used and the pile bore is filled with water or drilling behaviour is available.
mud, the bottom part may be concreted using tremie 6.4.4 The average settlement may be assessed on the
so that the liner is effectively sealed against ingress of basis of properties of subsoil/rock and loading details
ground water, the upper part may be concreted in dry of the structure as a whole using the principle of rock
condition after inspection of the top surface of the mechanics or as given in 6.6.
concrete already placed.
6.5 Estimation of Load Carrying Capacity
6 DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS
6.1 General
Rock socketed piles can be designed to carry
Pile foundations socketed in rock strata shall be compressive loads in side wall shear only or end
designed in such a way that the load from the structure bearing only, or a combination of both. The most
it supports, is transmitted to the rock without causing important factors that influence the design procedure
any rock failure and/or without causing such are the strength, degree of fracturing and modulus of
settlement (differential or total) under permanent/ deformation of rock mass, the condition of the walls
transient loading as may result in structural damage and base of the socket and the geometry of the socket.
2
“”_, ,.. ._ ” _.._ .._.._I_
Is 14593 : 1998
Depending upon the type of rock, any one of the discontinuity is greater than 300 mm and
following methods shall be used for computing aperture (opening) of discontinuities less
compression capacity: than 10 mm (15 mm if filled with soil or
rock debris. Otherwise Table 4 of IS 12070
a) Based on uniaxial compressive strength of
rock, is applicable).
b) Based on limit pressure of rock, IXvalues are given in Fig. 1 based on rock strength and
cl Based on shear strength of rock, and values ofJ in Fig. 2 based on mass factor.
4 Structural strength of pile.
NOTES Where the rock is relatively homogeneous and
1 Minimum length of socket for pmliinaty design may be competent and comparable with concrete in strength,
taken from Table 1, although it should be estimated from static in Equation (1).
computations given in this standardand preferablyvenif%dby
lopd test. 4c = safe strength of concrete, T/m2;
2 The rockup to depthof at leastone dinmeW belowthebase Nj = 0.3;
of the soeke is eitherintact or tightly jointed (no compressible
or gougcfille4iscores). = 0.05;
3 Thereare110solution cavities or voids below the base of the s* = 1;and
pile. N,j = 1.
Table 1 Suggested Minimum Length of Socket

(Clause 6.5.1, Note 1)
l-2 I1
Rod 5~ I*
(1) (2) a
Sound relatively homogeneous rock 1 to2Ll
including granite, gneiss
Moderatelyweathered,closely jointed 2to3D
including schist, slate
Soft rocks, sedimentaryrocks ‘including 3to4D
hardshale, sandstones, siltstone, mudstone
NOTE -D is the diameterof pile.
6.5.1.1 Based on uniaxial compressive strength 100 1000 10000

UNIAXIAL COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH
a) Where the rock is sound the strength of the Qa IN T/m2
foundation rock is generally much in excess of
the design requirements, provided the walls of
the discontinuity are closed and they FIG. 1 SIDE REXSTANCE REDUCTION FACTOR
are favourably oriented. Refer to Fig. 1 of REFLECTING VARIATION OF ROCK STRENGTH
IS 12070, with respect ‘to the applied forces
then the data to be investigated shall be as 1.0 ’
given in 6 of IS 12070.
0.8 -
where
Qs = safe load capacity of pile, in tonnes; 0.6 -
qc = uniaxial compressive strength of rock,
T/m’;
Nd = depth factor = O.&-O.21419,limited to 2;
A, = area of pile toe, 7cD2/4;
D = diameter of pile, in m;
I, = socket length into the rock, in m;
a = rock socket slide resistance reduction
factor (Fig. 1);
MASS REDUCTION FACT0R.j : x
B = rock socket correction factor (Fig. 2); and Ei
Nj = values as per Fig. 2 of IS 12070 are FIG. 2 SIDE RESISTANCE REDUCTION FACTOR
applicable, when the spacing of REFLECTING VARIATION OP MASS FACTOR
3
IS 14593 : b98
6.5.1.2 Based on pressuremeter test where

Qu = ultimate capacity of pile in compression, T;
This method is suited for weathered or closely jointed
rocks and for soft rocks. cu = shear strength of rock below pile tip, T/m2;
Qu = [Po + & (PI - PO >I A, +jmls . ..(2) NC = bearing capacity factor (equal to 9);
CS = average shear strength of rock adjacent to
where
the shaft in the socketed length (Fig. 4),
Qu = ultimate pile capacity in compression, T; T/m2;
PO = overburden pressure at the elevation of pile a = 0.9 (recommended value);
tip, T/m2; Fs = 6 (factor of safety); and
& = bearing capacity coefficient depending on IS = socket length, m.
socket length as given in Table 2;
P1 = limit pressure determined from
pressuremeter test in the zone extending
two times the pile diameter above and
below pile toe (top), T/m*; and
fi = frictional resistance component.
.
Table 2 Values of Kb
Socket Length
Pile Diameter
Kb
0
0.8
1
2.8
2
3.6
3
4.2
5
4.9
7
5.2
1,
10
04
-5
Values of fr depending on limit pressure are given in 06
Fig. 3, for: t O!
pl < 150 t/m* in highly weathered rocks; and 01
t/m2 for moderately weathered rocks. 0.2
The value offi should be limited to 0.05 times the

safe strength of concrete. 0-i
FIG. 4 INFLUENCEFACTORSFORSET’IUMENT
WITH DIFTERENTEMBEDMENTRATIOS (OF SOCKET
LENGTH)
The above method is applicable for siltstone. mud-

stone and weathered sandstone. The partially .
mobilized frictional resistance offered by the soil may
be neglected.
I
SO 100 MO
PI IN rpl+
6.5.1.4 Structural capacity
The piles shall have necessary structural strength to

FIG. 3 FRICTIONALRESISTANCEOF F%EB
transmit loads imposed on it, ultimately to the rock as
(som, WEATHEREDR~CTKS)
per IS 2911 (Part l/Set 2).
6.5.1.3 Estimation of compression capacity using
6.6 Settlement
shear strength parameters
Settlement for piles could be estimated from one of the
Qu = CUNC x xD214+ aCs x 01, ...(3) following methods.
4
IS 14593 : 1998
6.6.1 Based on IS 8009 (Part 2), settlement ‘s’ can be 6.6.3 For settlements of pile with both adhesion and
estimated as follows: end bearing, for varying rock moduli ranging from
moderately weathered to very strong rock, the
S =S,+si ...(4)
following method shall be used for computation:
where, S, is elastic compression and is given by:
s= 2 . ..(7)
PL
SP = AE
[ Ed 1s1
P P
where
Si = immediate settlement of pile P = design load, T;
L = length of the pile Ed = modulus of the rock mass, T/m2;
1, = influence factor as given in Fig. 4; and
.(5) 1s = length of socket.
6.6.4 The elastic compression of pile shall be added
to the settlement estimated from 6.6.2 and 6.6.3.
s = total settlement of the pile;
sp = elastic compression of pile; 6.7 IAeral Load Capacity
Si = immediate settlement of pile; 6.7.1 The capacity of a socketed pile to withstand
P = design load on pile; lateral loads depends on the rigidity of the pile as well
E,, = modulus of elasticity of pile; as the load-deformation characteristics, thickness of
CL = poisson’s ratio of rock; the soil and rock strata in which the pik is socketed.
Eci = modulus of deformation of rock mass; 6.7.2 For calculating the capacity of the pile socketed
Ei = modulus of deformation of rock material; in rock requires determination of the depth of frxity,
and lateral deflection and m&mum moment. Three
I = influence factor [value of influence factor different embedments of pile in rock are encountered
can be taken as specified in IS 8009 and the design is made accordingly.
(Part 1)l. a) Pile passing through soil of considerable thick-
6.6.2 For homogeneous and stratified rock mass, the ness [Fig. 5(a)],
following method shall be used for computing the b) Intermediate thickness of soil and rock [Fig.
settlement: XWL and
c) Pile fully embedded in rock [Fig. S(c)].
S=[9fY.Zm*J . ..(6)
6.7.3 Design Consia’emtions
where 6.7.3.1 Case (a)

E,,, = average pressuremeter modulus in the zone
extending 3 diameters below the pile toe When the rock into which the pile penetrates is
am = a coefficient which is a function of the covered by a relatively thick layer of soil Fig. S(a), the
structure of the rock mass (see also Table 3) influence of the rock is negligible, and the method of
estimation for capacity can be done similar to the
Table 3 Values of am method as mentioned in IS 2911 (Part l/&c 2).
6.7.3.2 Case (b)

spacingof 3.0 0.9-3.0 0.349 0.1-0.3
Dkontinuities Cm)
In case of intermediate pile Fig. S(b), the end restraint
a, 1 0.75 0.5 0.25 condition of the socketed pile should be accounted for
in the estimation of the lateral capacity, that is:
This method is applicable to homogeneous and
LS
stratified rock masses. In the latter case the modulus ifx<4 ..
to be used in the formula is taken as the weighted
average of the moduli measured in the different strata, where
provided the moduli do not differ by more than a L = length of pile in soil, and
factor 10. R = relative stiffness factor as per IS 29 11 (Part
The effect of thin horizontal joints or compressible l/Set 2).
seams cannot be taken into account in this method and The contribution of the rock can also be accounted for
the results may be misleading if such joints or seams taking. into account the variation in the modulus of
occur. subgrade reaction with depth.
5
(a) lb) Ic)

PILE SUPPORTING SOIL PILE FULLY FlYED IN PILE FULLY EMBEDDED
WITH MINIMUM ROCK FtOCK BELOW A THICK IN ROCK
PENETRATION SOIL LAYER
FIG. 5 DIFFERENT AMOUNTS OF EMBEDMENTSIN ROCKS
6.7.3.3 When the pile is fully embedded in rock, as b) Modulus of deformation of the rock mass both
shown in Fig. 5(c) with a higher modulus than that of around the socket and below the base;
the pile material, the lateral capacity it can resist is cl Stren@h of the rock in the walls of the socket
determined by the capacity of its section to resist &ear and below the pile;
forces. 4 Condition of the side walls with respect to
6.8 Uplift capacity roughness, and the presence ofdrill cuttings or
bentonite cakes;
6.8.1 Socketed piles can be designed to resist uplii
d Condition of the end of the pile with respect to
forces either by enlarging or belling the base, or by the removal of drill cuttings and other loose
developing sufficient side wall shear resistance. material from the bottom of the socket;
While belling the base of pile is common in soils, this
f) Layering in the rocks and the response of
can be an expensive and difficult operation in rock. seams with differing strengths and moduli;
Moreover, since a significant amount of side wall
shear resistance is developed in rock sockets, it is
Jz) Settlement of the pile in relation to the elastic
limit of side wall shear strength;
usually more economical to deepen the socket in rock
h) Creep of the material at the rock-concrete
than to construct a shorter, belled socket. interface resulting in increasing settlement
6.8.2 Uplif Resistance in Side Wall Shear with time; and
6.8.2.1 The preliminary design for uplift/tension

j) Effect of ground water table.
piles, can be carried out using the methods given for 6.10 Spacing of Piles
compression piles with due allowance for side Similarprovision as laid down in IS 2911 (Part l/Set 2).
adhesion and the factors shall be as per IS 12070.
However, full scale uplift load tests should be 6.10.1 For pile founded in bed rock spacing of twice
performed to determine the allowable side wall shear the pile diameter may be adopted. In case of weak and
resistance and the load displacement behaviour. weathered rock a minimum spacing of two-and-a-half
times the pile diameter may be provided.
6.8.2.2 The results of load-displacement tests
performed on tension piles can be used to calculate the 6.11 Pile grouping similar provisions as laid down in
shear stress developed on the side wall and the actual IS 2911 (Part l/Set 2).
displacement can be compared with the theoretical 6.11.1 Pile cap design shall conform to the provisions
displacement from elastic theory for compression laid down in IS 2911 (Part I/Set 2).
piles.
6.12 Factor of Safety
In all cases the minimum length of socket is 2 times
the socket diameter of pile. 6.12.1 Factor of safety should he judiciously chosen
considering the various factors. However, the
6.9 Factors Affecting the Load Capacity and
minimum factor of safety on static formula shall be 6.
Settlement of Socketed Pile
The final selection of factor of safety shall take into
a) Geometry of the socket defined by the length consideration the load settlement characteristics of the
to diameter ratio; structure as whole at a given site.
6
IS 14593 : 1998
6.12.2 The factor of safety may be increased in case 9.2.2 The safe load on single pile shall be the least of
of unfavourable conditions of rock, deterioration with the following:
time, vibrations from the structure/equipments. a) Fifty_ _percent of the load at 12 mm settlement
643 Transient loading similar provision as laid down unless otherwise required in a given case on
in IS 2911 (Part l&c 2). the basis of performance requirement.
b) One third of the ultimate failure load.
6.14 Overloading similar provisions as laid down in 9.2.3 Routine load test shall be carried out for a test
IS 2911 (Part l/Set 2). load of at least one-and-a-half times the working load,
6.15 Reinforcement similar provisions as laid down the maximum settlement of test loading in position
in IS 2911 (Part l/See 2). shall not exceed 8 mm.
7 MATERIALS AND STRESSES 9.3 Lateml Load
CONFORMING TO IS 2911 (Part l&ec 2) 93.1 The initial test pile may be tested up to
Cement steel and materials and methods of two-and-a-half times the estimated safe load or up to
manufacturer of concrete shall conform to the failure load whichever occurs earlier.
provisions of IS 2911 (Part l/Sac 2). 93.2 For piles embedded in rock lFig. 5 (b) and 5 (c)l,
the safe lateral load should be least of the following:
8 WORKMANSHIP
a) Fifty percent of the final load at which the total
Workmanship shall conform to IS 2911 (Part l/See 2). displacement increases to 8 mm.
Control of piling installation, concrete operations, b) Final load at which the total displacement cor-
method of placing concrete, convenience of responds to 4 mm.
installation, concrete above cut off level, cause and c) Load corresponding to any other displace-
remedies for defective piles, recording of piling data ment.
shall conform to the provisions of IS 291 l(Part l/See 2).
In addition to the above, after ensuring cleaning of pile 93.3 Routine load test shall be carried out for a test
bore including socket as specified concreting shall be load of at least one-and-a-half times the working load,
done immediately and shall be uninterrupted. the maximum deflection of test loading in position
shall not exceed 4 mm.
9 LOAD TEST
93.4 For condition of Fig. 5(a), the provisions of
9.1 To confirm the estimated load capacities in IS 2911 (Part 4) will be applicable.
compression, lateral and in pullout modes, pile load 9.4 PulIoat had
test shall be conducted on initial pile. The number of
test, test procedure, method of test shall be similar to 9.4.1 The initial test may be tested up to
the provision of IS 2911 (Part 4). Test on working pile two-and-a-half times the estimated safe load or up to
shall also be carried out. The interpretation of results failure whichever occurs earlier.
shall be made by competent geotechnical engineer as 9.4.2 The safe load shall be taken as the least of the
given in the following clauses. following:
9.2 Vertical Load TeJt a) Fifty percent of the load at which the total
displacement is 12 mm or the load correspond-
9.2.1 The initial test pile may be tested up to two-and- ing to a specified permissible uplift.
a-half times the estimated safe load or up to failure b) Forty percent of the load at which the load
load whichever occurs earlier. displacement curve shows a clear break.
IS 14593 : 1998
ANNEX A
(Foreword)
COMMITTEE COMF’OSITION
Rock Mechanics Sectional Committee, CED 48
Chairman Representing
PR~FBHAWANISINCZH University of Roorkee, Roorkee
Members
PROFP. K. JAIN University of Roorkee, Roorke-e
SHRIN. K. SAMADHYA(Alternate )
Ass~s~.&r RESEARCHOFFICER Inigation Department, U.P.
DR R. L. CHAUHAN Regional Engineering College, Hamirpur
CHIE&=J%IN~R (R & D) Irrigation Department, Haryana
DI~X-TQR(ENoo) ( Alfewkue )
SHRIDADE~HWAR GANGADHAR DHAYAGUDE Asia Foundations & Constructions Ltd. Mumbai
SH~I ARUN DATTATRAYAJOSHI( Alrernate )
DIRBCIUR 8c SBCRETMY Central Qround Water Board, New Delhi
DR A. K. DWE Central Mining Research Station (CSIR), Roorkee
SHR~A. K. SONI( Alrernate )
DR V. K. SINHA Central Mining Research Institute, Dhanbad
SHRIA. GHOSH Central Buildiig Research Institute (CSIR). Roorkee
DR G. S. MEHIOXA (Alternate )
DI- Geolagical %rvey of India, Calcutta
SHRIKARhlVIR Irrig&on & Power Dqxxtment, Chandigarh
DIRECTOR Gxtcal Water & Power Research Station, Pune
SHR~B. M. RAMA GOWDA( Alternate )
DR UDAY V. KULKARNI Hindustan Construction Co Ltd. Mumbai
DR R. P. KULKARNI Irrigation Department, Maharashtra
MEMBERSECRETARY Central Board of Irrigation & Power, New Delhi
Dmcron (C) ( Alfem#e )
DR D. N. NARESH National Thermal Power Corporation Ltd. New Delhi
SHRIM. D. NA~R Associated Instrument Manufacturers (I) pvt Ltd, New Delhi
SHIUB. K. SAIGAL ( Alternafe )
SHRID. M. PANCHOW Irrigation Department, Government of Gujarat
SHRIV. S. BRWAMBHA-~ Gujarat Engineering Research Institute. Vadodara
SCIENTWT INCHARGE National Geophysical Research Institute, Hyderabad
DR K. S. RAO Indian Geotcchnical Society, New Delhi
PROPT. RAMAMURTHY Indian Institute of Technology, New Delhi
DR G. V. RAO ( Alternate )
SHRIS. D. BARATHA Kamataka Engineering Reseqch Station, Kamataka
SHRIT. S. NARAYANADAS(Alternate)
SHRIA. K. DHAWAN CentraI Soil & Materials Research Station, New Delhi
SHRIJITINDRA SIHGH Engineer-in-Chief’s Branch, New Delhi
SHRID. K. JA~N(Ah-mute )
SHRIP. J. RAO Central Road Research Institute, New Delhi
SHRID. S. TOLIA( Alrernure )
SHRIRANJODH SINGH Naptha Jhakri Power Corporation, Shimla
SHRIU. S. RAWANSHI In Personal capacity (KC-38 Kavi Nugur, Ghaziabud)
DR J. L. JETH~A In Personal capacity (Scientist in-Charge, CMRI Station Unit, Magpur)
DR V. M. SHARMA In personal capacity (ATES, New Delhi)
SHRIVINODKUMAR, Director General, BIS (Ex-@icicioMember)
Director (Civ Engg)
Secretary
SHIUw R. PAUL
Joint Director (Civ Engg), BIS
(Continued on pnge 9)
IS 14593: 1998
(Continued.frompage 8)
Rock Slope Engineering and Foundation on Rock Subcommittee, CED 48:4
Convener Representing
PROFP. K. IAIN University of Roorkee, Roorkee
DR A. K. DHAWAN Central Soil and Materials Research Station, New Delhi

DR U. N. SINHA Central Building Research Institute (CSIR), Roorkee
SHRIA. GHOSH ( Alternate )
PROFT. RAMAMURTHY Indian Institute of Technology, New Delhi
DR K. G. SHARMA( Alternote )
DR YUDHBIR Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur
DR KISHORE KAUR Central Road Research Institute. New Delhi
DR V. V. S. VISWANATHAN ( Altemute)
SHRIV. K. KATWALA Central Mine Planning and Design Institute, Nagpur
SHRID. SENGUPTA ( Altemute )
DRV. K. SINGH Central Mining Research Institute, Dhanbad
DRV. K. MEHRO?RA U. P. Irrigation Department, Roorkee
SHRIY. A. K. SINGH P W D, Manipur
SHRID. G. KADKADE Jai Prakash Associates Pvt Ltd. New Delhi
SHRIR. K. JAIN( Alternate )
SHRIB. K. SHARMA National Hydroelectric Power Corporation Ltd. New Delhi
DR V. VENKATESWARALU National Instituteof Rock Mechanics, Kamataka
SHRIS. K. MATHUR RITES, New Delhi
SHRIV. V. NAYAK Trafalgat House, Mumbai
SHRIP. S. SENGUPTA(Alternate 1
Bureau of Indian Standards
BIS is a statutory institution established under the Bureau of Indian Standards Act, 1986 to promote
harmonious development of the activities of standardization, marking and quality certification of goods
and attending to connected matters in the country.
Copyright
BIS has the copyright of all its publications. No part of these publications may be reproduced in any form
without the prior permission in writing of BIS. This does not preclude the free use, in the course of
implementing the standard, of necessary details, such as symbols and sizes, type or grade designations.
Enquiries relating to copyright be addressed to the Director (Publications), BIS.
Review of Indian Standards
Amendments are issued to standards as the need arises on the basis of comments. Standards are also
reviewed periodically; a standard along with amendments is reaffirmed when such review indicates that
no changes are needed; if the review indicates that changes are needed, it is taken up for revision. Users
of Indian Standards should ascertain that they are in possession of the latest amendments or edition by
referring to the latest issue of ‘BIS Handbook’ and ‘Standards: Monthly Additions’.
This Indian Standard has been developed from Dot : No. CED 48 ( 5464 ).
Amendments Issued Since Publication
Amend No. Date of Issue Text Affected
BUREAU OF INDIAN STANDARDS
Headquarters:
Manak Bhavan, 9 Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi 110 002 Telegrams : Manaksanstha
Telephones : 323 01 3 1, 323 33 75,323 94 02 (Common to all offices)
Regional Offices : Telephone
Central : Manak Bhavan, 9 Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg 323 76 17

NEW DELHI 110 002 323 3841
I
Eastern : l/14 C. LT. Scheme VII M, V. I. P. Road, Maniktola 3378499,3378561
CALCUTTA 700 054 337 86 26,337 91 20
1
Northern : SC0 335-336, Sector 34-A, CHANDIGARH 160 022 60 38 43

60 20 2s
1
Southern : C. I. T. Campus, IV Cross Road, CHENNAI 600 113 235 02 16,235 04 42
235 15 19,235 23 IS
1
Western : Manakalaya, E9 MIDC, Marol, Andheri (East) 832 92 95,832 78 5R
MUMBAI 400 093 8X27891,8327892
Branches : AHMADABAD. BANGALORE. BHOPAL. BHUBANESHWAR. COIMBATORE.

FARIDABAD. GHAZIABAD. GUWAHATI. HYDERABAD. JAIPUR. KANPUR.
LUCKNOW. NAGPUR. PATNA. PUNE. THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
Printed at Printugrlrph. New 1)&i, HI : 5726847

AMENDMENT NO. 1 JUNE 2011

TO
IS 14593 : 1998 DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF BORED CAST IN-SITU
PILES FOUNDED ON ROCKS — GUIDELINES
[Page 3, clause 6.5.1.1(a), line 18] — Substitute `side’ for `slide’.
(Page 3, Fig. 2) — Substitute:
‘MODULUS REDUCTION FACTOR, ‘MASS REDUCTION FACTOR,

E for E
i= d ’ i= d ’
Er Ei
[Page 3, clause 6.5.1.1(a), para 2, line 2] — Substitute ‘modulus reduction’ for ‘mass’.
(Page 5, clause 6.6.3, line 10) — Substitute:
‘lr = influence factor as given in Fig. 4
Ep
=
Eds
where
Ep = modulus of pile material;

Eds = modulus of rock mass around socket.
for
‘lr = influence factor as given in Fig. 4; and’
(Page 5, clause 6.7.3.2, line 8) — Substitute:
‘R = relative stiffness factor

Ep lp
= 4
Es ls
1
Amend No. 1 to IS 14593 : 1998
where
Ep = modulus of pile material;

Es = modulus of soil;
Ip = moment of inertia of pile; and
ls = length of socket.
for
‘R = relative stiffness factor as per IS 2911 (Part 1/Sec 2)’.
(Page 7, clause 7, line 2) — Substitute `manufacture’ for `manufacturer’.
(CED 48)
Reprography Unit, BIS, New Delhi, India

Is 14593 - 2013

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Is 14593 - 2013

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Is 14593 - 2013

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

(Reaffirmed 2015)

BUREAU OF INDIAN STANDARDS

Rock Mechanics Sectional Committee, CED 48

DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF BORED

Boring operations are generally done by rotary or 6.3 Loading on Piles

Table 1 Suggested Minimum Length of Socket

6.5.1.1 Based on uniaxial compressive strength 100 1000 10000

6.5.1.2 Based on pressuremeter test where

t/m2 for moderately weathered rocks. 0.2

The value offi should be limited to 0.05 times the

The above method is applicable for siltstone. mud-

The piles shall have necessary structural strength to

where 6.7.3.1 Case (a)

6.7.3.2 Case (b)

(a) lb) Ic)

FIG. 5 DIFFERENT AMOUNTS OF EMBEDMENTSIN ROCKS

6.8.2.1 The preliminary design for uplift/tension

Rock Mechanics Sectional Committee, CED 48

Rock Slope Engineering and Foundation on Rock Subcommittee, CED 48:4

DR A. K. DHAWAN Central Soil and Materials Research Station, New Delhi

Bureau of Indian Standards

Review of Indian Standards

Amendments Issued Since Publication

Amend No. Date of Issue Text Affected

BUREAU OF INDIAN STANDARDS

Regional Offices : Telephone

Central : Manak Bhavan, 9 Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg 323 76 17

Northern : SC0 335-336, Sector 34-A, CHANDIGARH 160 022 60 38 43

Branches : AHMADABAD. BANGALORE. BHOPAL. BHUBANESHWAR. COIMBATORE.

Printed at Printugrlrph. New 1)&i, HI : 5726847

AMENDMENT NO. 1 JUNE 2011

(Page 3, Fig. 2) — Substitute:

‘MODULUS REDUCTION FACTOR, ‘MASS REDUCTION FACTOR,

(Page 5, clause 6.6.3, line 10) — Substitute:

‘lr = influence factor as given in Fig. 4

Ep = modulus of pile material;

‘lr = influence factor as given in Fig. 4; and’

(Page 5, clause 6.7.3.2, line 8) — Substitute:

‘R = relative stiffness factor

Amend No. 1 to IS 14593 : 1998

Ep = modulus of pile material;

‘R = relative stiffness factor as per IS 2911 (Part 1/Sec 2)’.

(Page 7, clause 7, line 2) — Substitute `manufacture’ for `manufacturer’.

You might also like