Gap Analysis - Sip 2019

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 8

ANNEX 3 Gap Analysis Template

SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLANNING

GAP ANALYSIS TEMPLATE REGION: Cordillera Administrative Region


DIVISION: Schools Division of Mountain Province
DISTRICT: Besao
BARANGAY: Ambaguio
SCHOOL: Ambagiw Elementary School

A.DIVISION A. ACCESS
TARGETS/STAND B1.DATA B2. CURRENTLY INHIBITING B4. B5.GROUPS
ARDS/POLICIES/ NEEDED CONTRIBUTING FACTORS PROJECTS/PRO THAT REQUIRE
OPCR/IPCRF (SCHOOL DATA) YES/ EXPLANATION GRAMS/ACTIVITI ATTENTION
Targets NO ES
IMPLEMENTED
1)0% Drop-Out 2016-2017-0% Yes The Drop-Out Presence of “SEMANA” Academically
Rate 2017-2018-0% Rate for the last academically challenged
2018-2019-0% three years is 0% challenged learners learners
2)100% Percentage 2016-2017- 97.33 No 97.62% average 1 pupil cannot attain “SEMANA” and Pupils incurring
of Attendance 2017-2018-96.04 of attendance for 100% attendance due Home Visitation absences
2018-2019- 98.48 the last three to heart ailment
years
3)0% Failure Rate 2016-2017-0% Yes 0% last three Presence of pupils Remediation Pupils at risk of
2017-2018-0% years with poor study habits Program failing
2018-2019-0%

B. QUALITY
1)100% Promotion 2016-2017-100% Yes 100% Promotion Presence of learners Remediation Pupils at risk of
Rate 2017-2018-100% Rate over the last with poor study habits Program failing and
2018-2019-100% three years dropping
2) 0% Frustration 2018-2019- 0% Yes 2/14 fall under Non-cooperative pupil Implementation of Pupils that fall
Level Frustration Level Instructional Level during remedial the under Frustration
while 12/14 fall program “ Iyon-a Umitdo Level
under Ka Program”
Independent level
3)100% Graduation 100% graduation Yes Target attained Presence of learners Remedial Program Learners at risk
Rate rate for the past at risk of Dropping of dropping
three years Out
4)Quality Assured 0 Quality No LMS used in Teachers do not SLAC on LMS School Head,
Small Books Assured LMS school are not prepare the necessary preparation for Teachers,
(LRMDC) (LRMDC) quality assured in documents for quality quality assurance Validators
the LRMDS assured LMS at the LRMDC

C. GOVERNANCE
1)100% Brigada 2016-2017- 75% Planning was not well
Low Brigada Brigada Eskwela
Eskwela 2017-2018-78% represented by all SPT, resource
Eskwela Information
Participation 2018-2019-80% NO stakeholders/Poor mobilization
Participation of Dissemination,
Dissemination committee
stakeholders Brigada Plus
2)100% 2016-2017- Trainings were
participation rate of 2017-2018- divided equally School Head
YES unavailability of funds SLACS/INSET
teachers to 2018-2019- among school Teachers
trainings personnel
3 )Zero bullying rate 2016-2017- CPP orientation,
Ambagiw ES is a
2017-2018- non – compliance to partnership with
YES child friendly all learners
2018-2019- CPP concerns Volunteers for
school
Values Program
4)Advanced SBM SBM Level of No The SBM Level of Lack of Preparation of all School Head,
Level of Practice: practice is the school is documentation pertinent Teachers and
developing developing documents/ Means PTA Officers
of Verification
5)Recipient of 2016-2017- No No recipients of Inactive PRAISE Re-organization of School Head,
Awards 2017-2018- PRAISE Committee PRAISE Teachers and
2018-2019- Committee PTA Officers
School: AMBAGIW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL District: BESAO

ANNEX 4 Identifying Improvement Areas

IDENTIFY PRIORITY IMPROVEMENT AREAS

Improvement Areas Strategic Urgency Magnitude Feasibility Average Interpretation


Importance
ACCESS
1) Low attendance rate 5 5 3 5 4.5 Very High Priority
2)Presence of PARDOs 5 3 2 5 3.75 High Priority
Affects promotion,
graduation rate and
SBM level and
OPCR
3)Presence of pupils at 5 3 2 5 3.75 High Priority
risk of failing Affects promotion,
graduation rate and
SBM level and
OPCR
4)Low Enrolment Rate 5 5 5 3 4.5 Very High Priority
QUALITY
1)Presence of pupils at 5 5 5 5 5 Very High Priority
risk of failing
2)Low Performance in 5 5 5 5 5 Very High Priority
Academic Contests
3) High graduation rate 5 3 5 5 4.5 Very High Priority
4) Presence of Small 5 5 5 5 5 Very High Priority
Books that are not
Quality Assured
(LRMDC)
GOVERNANCE
1)Low Brigada Eskwela 5 5 5 3 4.5 Very High Priority
Participation Rate

2) 4 goals under CFSS 5 5 3 5 4.5 Very High Priority


(Annex 2A) were not
attained
3)Low SBM level of 5 5 5 5 5 Very High Priority
practice
4)Minimal awards 5 5 5 5 5 Very High Priority
received
5)Presence of Inactive 5 5 5 5 5 Very High Priority
Organized
committees(PRAISE)
School: AMBAGIW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL District: BESAO

ANNEX 5 Planning Worksheet

PLANNING WORKSHEET

PLANNING WORKSHEET FOR ACCESS AND QUALITY


LEARNING DEPED PRIORITY GENERAL ROOT CAUSE/S TIME FRAME
STAGE INTERMEDIATE IMPROVEMENT OBJECTIVE/S SY SY20 SY20
OUTCOMES AREA 2020- 21- 22-
2021 2022 2023
K-12 101: Learners are in Low attendance To increase
school and learning rate attendance rate
centers from 98.48% to
99.5% in three
years
102: Learners access Low To receive one
programs responsive to performance in award (District
their needs and academic Level; 1st-3rd
consistent with their contests rank)for each
interests and attitudes School Year
Presence of To submit Story
Small Books that Books for Quality
are not Quality Assurance at the
Assured LRMDC
(LRMDC)

103: Learners enjoy 4 goals under To achieve 2 goals


learner-friendly CFSS (Annex under CFSS in 3
environment 2A) were not years
attained
104: Learners actively Minimal awards To receive 1 award
participate in their received by (District Level) for
learning environment learners each school year in
three years
105: Learners attain Presence of To decrease
learning standards pupils at risk of presence of pupils
failing at risk of failing
from 12% to 6% in
three years
106: Learners are well – 75% To increase
rounded, happy and implementation implementation
smart of Child rate of Child
Protection Policy Protection Policy
from 75% to 100%
in three years

PLANNING WORKSHEET FOR GOVERNANCE


LEARNING DEPED PRIORITY GENERAL ROOT CAUSE/S TIME FRAME
STAGE INTERMEDIATE IMPROVEMENT OBJECTIVE/S SY SY SY
OUTCOMES AREA 2020-
2021
101: Education leaders Low SBM level To increase SBM level
and managers practice of practice of practice from 1.
participative and 4896 to 1.90 in three
inclusive management years
processes
102: Internal systems Presence of To increase
and processes needed Inactive functionality of all
for continuous Organized school Committees
improvement in place committees from 75% to 85%
103: Growing number Low Brigada To increase
of stakeholders actively Eskwela participation rate of
participate and Participation stakeholders to
collaborate in Rate Brigada Eskwela from
convergence 80 % to 86% in three
mechanism at all levels years

You might also like