Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 85 views

    Comment FOE Lim

    Uploaded by

    Sharon N. Banagen Soliba
    The document summarizes a comment/objection filed by the accused in a court martial case against them by the Philippine Air Force. The accused objects to several exhibits submitted as evidence by the prosecution. They argue that affidavits and statements in several of the exhibits are hearsay, self-serving, and not supported by records. Additionally, documents attached to one affidavit are inadmissible because the individual did not testify to affirm their contents. The accused requests the court deny admission of the objected exhibits.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Comment FOE Lim

    Uploaded by

    Sharon N. Banagen Soliba
    85 views2 pages
    The document summarizes a comment/objection filed by the accused in a court martial case against them by the Philippine Air Force. The accused objects to several exhibits submitted as evidence by the prosecution. They argue that affidavits and statements in several of the exhibits are hearsay, self-serving, and not supported by records. Additionally, documents attached to one affidavit are inadmissible because the individual did not testify to affirm their contents. The accused requests the court deny admission of the objected exhibits.

    Original Description:

    Comment on FOE filed with PAFGCM

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The document summarizes a comment/objection filed by the accused in a court martial case against them by the Philippine Air Force. The accused objects to several exhibits submitted as evidence by the prosecution. They argue that affidavits and statements in several of the exhibits are hearsay, self-serving, and not supported by records. Additionally, documents attached to one affidavit are inadmissible because the individual did not testify to affirm their contents. The accused requests the court deny admission of the objected exhibits.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as doc, pdf, or txt
    85 views2 pages

    Comment FOE Lim

    Uploaded by

    Sharon N. Banagen Soliba
    The document summarizes a comment/objection filed by the accused in a court martial case against them by the Philippine Air Force. The accused objects to several exhibits submitted as evidence by the prosecution. They argue that affidavits and statements in several of the exhibits are hearsay, self-serving, and not supported by records. Additionally, documents attached to one affidavit are inadmissible because the individual did not testify to affirm their contents. The accused requests the court deny admission of the objected exhibits.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as doc, pdf, or txt
    of 2

    ARMED FORCES OF THE PHILIPPINES

    HEADQUARTERS PHILIPPINE AIRFORCE


    PHILIPPINE AIR FORCE GENERAL COURT MARTIAL NR 1
    Laurel Hall of Justice, Office of the Air Judge Advocate
    Col Jesus Villamor Air Base, Pasay City

    PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES

    -VS- FOR: VIOLATION OF AW 96

    ABC
    Accused.
    x- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -x

    COMMENT/OBJECTIONS
    (To the Prosecution’s Formal Offer of Evidence)

    WITH ALL DUE RESPECT TO THE HONORABLE COURT.

    Accused has until 20 October 2019 to file its comments/opposition to the


    Prosecution’s Formal Offer of Evidence but said day is a Sunday, hence, the filing is the
    next working day which is 21 October 2019. The filing of the comment/objection is
    timely.

    ACCUSED by the undersigned counsel and unto this Honorable Court, most
    respectfully comments and/or objects to the admission of the Prosecution’s Formal Offer
    of Evidence as follows:

    The ACCUSED further objects to the purpose of the offer as follows:

    EXHIBITS DESCRIPTION COMMENTS/OBJECTIONS

    “A” Affidavit of Ms. Lim dated 04 The Accused objects to the purposes of the
    May 2017 offer said statements or allegations are self-
    serving, mere conclusion of law and the same
    are not supported by records.

    “A-1” Signature of Ms. Doreen T. De The accused admits the existence of the
    Leon Sinumpaang Salaysay and the signature
    thereto.

    Page 1 of 2
    “B” to “B-6 Attachment to the Sinumpaang The accused objects to the purpose, Tan did
    Salaysay of Ms.Lim not testify before the Honorable Court to affirm
    the conversation between her and Ms. Lim,
    thus considered as hearsay, she was not
    subjected to cross examination by the defense
    counsel thus violates the constitutional right of
    the accused of confrontation/cross
    examination.

    These attachment is likewise inadmissible


    as evidence due to the reason that it was
    never identified by Ms. Tan

    RELIEF

    WHEREFORE, Accused most respectfully prays to this Honorable Court that the
    foregoing object and documentary exhibits mentioned above be denied admission for
    the reasons above stated. The Accused further prays for such other relief as may be
    just and equitable under the premises.

    20 October 2019, Taguig City for Pasay City.

    EXPLANATION

    The filing of this Comment/Objection was done through LBC due to manpower
    constraints.

    Page 2 of 2

    You might also like