Non-Operating Room Anesthesia: April 2017
Non-Operating Room Anesthesia: April 2017
Non-Operating Room Anesthesia: April 2017
net/publication/316088266
CITATIONS READS
0 180
1 author:
Alessandro Bacuzzi
Varese University Hospital
112 PUBLICATIONS 1,374 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Alessandro Bacuzzi on 13 April 2017.
Alessandro BACUZZI
S.C. Anestesia, Rianimazione e Cure Palliative
Direttore: Salvatore CUFFARI
Introduction
NORA
(MAC) monitored anesthesia care
NORA
2009
Minimal Moderate
Deep sedation/
Continuum of depth of Sedation Sedation / Analgesia General Anesthesia
Analgesia
(anxiolysis) (“conscious sedation”)
sedation
Normal Purposeful
Unarousable even
response to Purposeful response to response following
Responsiveness with painful
verbal verbal or tactile stimulation repeated or painful
stimulus
stimulation stimulation
Isobolographic analysis
Sedative Combinations Produce Variable Synergism
Inclusion criteria for the current study were claims forevents that occurred in 1990 or later.
Exclusion criteria were obstetric claims (vaginal delivery and cesarean section) and claims arising from acute or chronic pain
management.
Remote location claims were identified by location (e.g. emergency room) or procedures that are commonly performed in remote
locations (e.g. cardiology, gastrointestinal, imaging, and lithotripsy).
The comparison group of operating room claims included all other claims in the database that satisfied inclusion and exclusion
criteria.
The physical or psychological injury for which the patient was seeking compensation was recorded in each claim.
Each claim was assigned a severity of injury score using the insurance industry’s 10-point scale that rates severity from zero (no
injury) to nine (death). For purposes of analysis, injuries were grouped into three categories:
temporary or nondisabling (score 0–5),
disabling and permanent (score 6–8),
and death (score 9).
Patients’ injuries were judged by the on-site reviewer for theoretical preventability by the use of additional and improved monitoring
techniques, such as pulse oximetry and capnography, assuming optimal use of these techniques.
• Anesthesia at remote locations poses a significant risk for the patient. Sources of risk include
the patient’s medical status, the procedure, the anesthetic, the equipment and the environment. Similar
anesthesia and monitoring standards and guidelines should be used in all anesthesia care areas.
• Every anesthesia service should draw up an organization model for anesthesia procedures
performed in nonoperating room locations in relation to hospital set up and design and type and
frequency of services ordered.
• Not Them, Not Us, But We: the Importance of teamwork in the NORA environment.
Collaborative action has led to better patient care and quality management.