Bacani HW Finals
Bacani HW Finals
Bacani HW Finals
BSA41
REQUIREMENT A
Year
1 2 3
Saving in fleet costs 10% $ 250,000.00 $ 275,000.00 $ 302,500.00
Less: Driver's Costs $ (33,000.00) $ (35,000.00) $ (36,000.00)
Repairs & Maintenance $ (8,000.00) $ (13,000.00) $ (15,000.00)
Other Costs (net of depreciation*) $ (10,000.00) $ (15,000.00) $ (20,000.00)
Net Savings $ 199,000.00 $ 212,000.00 $ 231,500.00
REQUIREMENT B
(i) Payback 3.00
Initial Cost of Investment $ 750,000.00
Less: Net Savings (y1 to y3) $ (642,500.00) $ 107,500.00
divide: y4 Net Savings $ 262,750.00 0.41
Payback Period 3.41
12%
(iii) Year Cost PV Factor Present value
0 $ (750,000.00)
1 $ 199,000.00 0.8929 $ 177,678.57
2 $ 212,000.00 0.7972 $ 169,005.10
3 $ 231,500.00 0.7118 $ 164,777.13
4 $ 262,750.00 0.6355 $ 166,982.38
$ 286,025.00 0.5674 $ 162,298.27
5
$ 150,000.00 0.5674 $ 85,114.03
Net Present Value $ 175,855.47
REQUIREMENT C
The proposed project resulted to a higher NPV, a longer payback period, and a lower ARR. It is much accurate to l
NPV since it takes into account the time value of money unlike payback and ARR. Moreover, it signifies that the in
cash inflows than the alternative because it has a higher NPV as compared to the alternative project.
Another disadvantage of ARR is that it can be manipulated easily by changes in the depreciation methods.
On the other hand, one of payback's disadvantage is that it gives much greater weight on cash flows at the
beginning of the period.
Year *Cost of Transport fleet $ 750,000.00
4 5 Less: Salvage value $ (150,000.00)
$ 332,750.00 $ 366,025.00 Depreciable Cost $ 600,000.00
$ (38,000.00) $ (40,000.00) divide: useful life 5
$ (16,000.00) $ (18,000.00) Annual Depreciation $ 120,000.00
$ (16,000.00) $ (22,000.00)
$ 262,750.00 $ 286,025.00 $ 1,191,275.00
years
$ 750,000.00
1/2 $ 375,000.00
$ 150,000.00
1/2 $ 75,000.00
erage Investment $ 450,000.00
ciation methods.
cash flows at the
Bacani, Christian Kyle B.
BSA41
10% 10%
Year Project A Project B Difference PV Factor
0 $ (1,000.00) $ (10,000.00) $ (9,000.00)
1 $ 240.00 2,300.00 $ 2,060.00 0.9091
2 $ 288.00 2,640.00 $ 2,352.00 0.8264
3 $ 346.00 3,040.00 $ 2,694.00 0.7513
4 $ 414.00 3,500.00 $ 3,086.00 0.6830
5 $ 498.00 4,020.00 $ 3,522.00 0.6209
NPV $ 308.14 1,443.4 $ 1,135.24
IRR 20% 15% 14%
With the use of IRR, it ranks Project A higher than Project B. On the other hand, using NPV as basis
it ranks Project B higher than Project A. If both are mutually exclusive projects and we had only taken into accoun
we will be mislead to choose project A.
To compare projects with unequal investments, it is necessary to consider the excess funds (9,000 in this analysi
and how it will be utilized. If it is to be invested and will earn the 1,135.24, then it is also desirable to choose proj
However, when IRR is used to rank projects, NPV will not be maximized. NPV is the best measure that is why we s
using it as basis.
ad only taken into account the IRR of both projects,
YEAR
1 2
inflow Sales $ 8,750,000.00 $ 12,250,000.00
outflows Less: Materials $ (1,340,000.00) $ (1,875,000.00)
Labour $ (2,675,000.00) $ (3,750,000.00)
Overheads $ (185,000.00) $ (250,000.00)
Working capital recovery
Payment of Corporate Tax $ (615,000.00)
Net Cash Flow $ 4,550,000.00 $ 5,760,000.00
Discount factor 17% 0.8547 0.7305
Discounted Cash Flow $ 3,888,888.89 $ 4,207,758.05
c. The taxable profits is based on profit before depreciation and after capital allowance which is 25% of its opening bal
At the end of the term of project, the claim for a balancing allowance is available to ensure that the net cost of the a
has been allowed as a deductible expense over the project's life. In addition to that, the problem also specifies that
d. the use of NPV is based on cashflows whereas the given projections uses accrual method in which will result to temp
Moreover, the projection ignores the essence of time value of money and also considers interest payments. Interest
are not included in NPV analysis since it may resultto double counting.
YEAR
3 4
$ 5,625,000.00 $ 4,218,750.00
$ 1,406,250.00 $ 4,218,750.00
$ 13,300,000.00 $ 14,350,000.00
$ 2,250,000.00 $ 2,625,000.00
$ 4,500,000.00 $ 5,250,000.00
$ 250,000.00 $ 250,000.00
$ 6,300,000.00 $ 6,225,000.00
$ 1,406,250.00 $ 4,218,750.00
$ 4,893,750.00 $ 2,006,250.00
$ 1,468,125.00 $ 601,875.00
$ 3,425,625.00 $ 1,404,375.00
YEAR
3 4 5
$ 13,300,000.00 $ 14,350,000.00
$ (2,250,000.00) $ (2,625,000.00)
$ (4,500,000.00) $ (5,250,000.00)
$ (250,000.00) $ (250,000.00)
$ 1,000,000.00
$ (1,350,000.00) $ (1,468,125.00) $ (601,875.00)
$ 4,950,000.00 $ 5,756,875.00 $ (601,875.00)
0.6244 0.5337 0.4561
$ 3,090,634.25 $ 3,072,156.62 $ (274,521.90) $ 13,984,915.92