A792a792m 28998
A792a792m 28998
A792a792m 28998
for the
Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Tue May 21 12:06:35 EDT 2019
2
Downloaded/printed by
Univ de los Andes (Univ de los Andes) pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
A792/A792M − 10 (2015)
TABLE 2 Chemical RequirementsA
Composition, %—Heat Analysis Element, Maximum, Unless Otherwise Shown
Designation C Mn P S Al Cu Ni Cr Mo V Cb TiB N B
CS Type AC, D, E 0.10 0.60 0.030 0.035 ... 0.25 0.20 0.15 0.06 0.008 0.008 0.025 ... ...
CS Type BC, F 0.02 to 0.15 0.60 0.030 0.035 ... 0.25 0.20 0.15 0.06 0.008 0.008 0.025 ... ...
CS Type CC, D, E 0.08 0.60 0.10 0.035 ... 0.25 0.20 0.15 0.06 0.008 0.008 0.025 ... ...
FSC , G 0.02 to 0.10 0.50 0.020 0.030 ... 0.25 0.20 0.15 0.06 0.008 0.008 0.025 ... ...
DSD , E 0.06 0.50 0.020 0.025 0.01, min 0.25 0.20 0.15 0.06 0.008 0.008 0.025 ... ...
HTSC 0.02 to 0.15 0.60 0.040, min 0.035 ... 0.25 0.20 0.15 0.06 0.008 0.008 0.025 ... ...
A
Where an ellipsis (. . .) appears in the table, there is no requirement, but the analysis result shall be reported.
B
For steels containing more than 0.02 % carbon, titanium is permitted at the producer’s option, to the lesser of 3.4N + 1.5S or 0.025 %, for the purpose of stabilization.
C
When a deoxidized steel is required for the application, the purchaser has the option to order CS, FS, and HTS to a minimum of 0.01 % total aluminum.
D
Steel is permitted to be furnished as a vacuum degassed or chemically stabilized steel, or both, at producer’s option.
E
For carbon levels less than or equal to 0.02 %, vanadium, columbium, or titanium, or combinations thereof are permitted to be used as stabilizing elements at producer’s
option. In such cases, the applicable limit for vanadium and columbium shall be 0.10 % max. and the limit for titanium shall be 0.15 % max.
F
For CS, specify Type B to avoid carbon levels below 0.02 %.
G
Shall not be furnished as a stabilized steel.
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Tue May 21 12:06:35 EDT 2019
3
Downloaded/printed by
Univ de los Andes (Univ de los Andes) pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
A792/A792M − 10 (2015)
TABLE 4 Mechanical Property Requirements, Structural Steel TABLE 5 Typical Ranges of Mechanical Properties
Base Metal (Longitudinal) (Nonmandatory)A, B
Inch-Pound Units Longitudinal Direction
Yield Designation Yield Strength Elongation
A
Tensile Strength, Elongation rm n
Grade Strength, 2 in. [50
min, ksi in 2 in., min, % ksi MPa ValueC ValueD
min, ksi mm] %
33 33 45 20
E E
37 37 52 18 CS Type A 30/60 [205/410] $20
E E
40 40 55 16 CS Type B 35/60 [245/410] $20
E E
50 Class 1 50 65 12 CS Type C 30/65 [205/450] $15
50 Class 2 50 ... 12 FS 25/40 [170/275] $24 1.0/1.4 0.16/0.20
50 Class 4 50 60 12 DS 20/35 [140/240] $30 1.3/1.7 0.18/0.22
E E
60 60 70 10B HTS 30/65 [205/450] $15
70 70 80 9B A
The typical mechanical property values presented in this table are nonmanda-
80 Class 1C 80D 82 ... tory. They are intended solely to provide the purchaser with as much information
80 Class 2C,E 80D 82 ... as possible to make an informed decision on the steel to be specified. Values
80 Class 3 80D 82F 3 outside of these ranges are to be expected. The purchaser may negotiate with the
SI Units supplier if a specific or restricted range is required for the application.
Yield Elongation B
These typical mechanical properties apply to the full range of steel sheet
Tensile Strength,
Grade Strength, in 50 mm, min, thicknesses. The yield strength tends to increase and some of the formability
min, MPa
min, MPa % values tend to decrease as the sheet thickness decreases.
230 230 310 20 C
rm Value—Average plastic strain ratio as described in Test Method E517.
255 255 360 18 D
n Value—Strain hardening exponent as described in Test Method E646.
275 275 380 16 E
No typical properties have been established.
340 Class 1 340 450 12
340 Class 2 340 ... 12
340 Class 4 340 410 12
410 410 480 10B TABLE 6 Coating Bend Test Requirements—Structural Steel
480 480 550 9B
Ratio of the Inside Bend Diameter to
550 Class 1C 550D 570 ...
Grade Thickness of the Specimen
550 Class 2C,E 550D 570 ...
(Any Direction)
550 Class 3 550D 570F 3
A
33 [230] 11⁄2
Where an ellipses (. . .) appears in the table, there is no requirement. 37 [255] 2
B
For sheet thickness of 0.028 in. [0.71 mm] or thinner, the elongation requirement 40 [275] 21⁄2
is reduced two percentage points for SS Grades 60 [410] and 70 [480]. 50 Class 1, Class 2, and A
C
For sheet thicknesses of 0.028 in. and thinner, no tension test is required if the Class 4
hardness result is Rockwell B85 or higher. 60 A
D
As there is no discontinuous yield curve, the yield strength should be taken as 70 A
the stress at 0.5 % elongation under load or 0.2 % offset. [340 Class 1, Class 2, and Class 4]
E
SS Grade 80 [550] Class 2 may exhibit different forming characteristics than 80 Class 1, Class 2, and A
Class 1, due to a difference in chemistry. Class 3
F
The purchaser should consult with the producer when ordering SS Grade 80 [550] [550 Class 1, Class 2, and
Class 3 material in sheet thicknesses 0.028 in. [0.71 mm] or thinner regarding Class 3]
elongation and tension test requirements.
A
Grades not subject to bend test requirements.
thickness of the specimen as shown in Table 6. Flaking of the 9.2 Disposition of non-conforming material shall be subject
coating within 0.25 in. [6 mm] of the edge of the bend to the requirements of 9.2 of Specification A924/A924M.
specimen shall not be cause for rejection.
10. Dimensions and Permissible Variations
9. Retests and Disposition of Non-Conforming Material 10.1 All dimensions and permissible variations shall com-
9.1 Retests, conducted in accordance with the requirements ply with the requirements of Specification A924/A924M.
of the section on Retests and Disposition of Non-Conforming
Material of Specification A924/A924M, are permitted when an 11. Keywords
unsatisfactory test result is suspected to be the consequence of 11.1 55 % aluminum-zinc alloy coating; coatings, metallic;
the test method procedure. steel sheet, metallic coated
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Tue May 21 12:06:35 EDT 2019
4
Downloaded/printed by
Univ de los Andes (Univ de los Andes) pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
A792/A792M − 10 (2015)
SUPPLEMENTARY REQUIREMENTS
The following standardized supplementary requirements are for use when desired by the purchaser.
These additional requirements shall apply only when specified on the order.
S1. Base Metal Thickness S1.3 The applicable tolerances for base metal thickness are
S1.1 The specified minimum thickness shall apply to the shown in Tables 16 and 17, Thickness Tolerance of Cold-
base metal only. Rolled Sheet (Carbon and High-Strength, Low-Alloy Steel), of
S1.2 The coating designation shown on the order indicates Specification A568/A568M.
the coating to be applied to the specified minimum base metal
thickness.
APPENDIXES
X2.1 Subcommittee A05.11 has revised the designations hardness test which may not compensate adequately for
used to classify the various products available in each hot-dip product variables such as substrate thickness and coating
coated specification. The previous “quality” designations have weight.
been replaced with designations and descriptions more closely
related with product characteristics. Many of the former X2.3 The new designations also provide the user with the
“quality” specifications described the steel only in terms of flexibility to restrict the steels applied on any order. For
limited chemical composition, which in some cases was example, a user can restrict the application of ultra low carbon
identical for two or more qualities. The former designations steels on an application through the selection of an appropriate
also did not reflect the availability of new steels which are the “type” designator.
result of the use of new technologies such as vacuum degassing X2.4 There is a limited relationship between the former and
and steel ladle treatments. current systems of designation. Some of the reasons for this
limited relationship are: addition of steels not previously
X2.2 The former “quality” designators, defined in very described in ASTM specifications, restrictions placed on
broad qualitative terms, did not provide the user with all the ranges of chemical composition, the addition of typical me-
information needed to select the appropriate steel for an chanical properties, and the enhanced capability of steel
application. The new designations are defined with technical producers to combine chemical composition and processing
information such as specific chemical composition limits and methods to achieve properties tailored to specific applications.
typical-nonmandatory mechanical properties. These steel char-
acteristics are important to users concerned with the weldabil- X2.5 The changes in designation are significant which may
ity and formability of the coated steel products. The typical create transition issues that will have to be resolved. Continued
mechanical properties included in the new designation system dialogue between users and producers will have to be main-
are those indicated by the tension test. These properties are tained to assist the transition to the new system of designations.
more predictive of steel formability than other tests such as the A user with concerns about the appropriate coated steel to order
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Tue May 21 12:06:35 EDT 2019
5
Downloaded/printed by
Univ de los Andes (Univ de los Andes) pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
A792/A792M − 10 (2015)
for a specific application should consult with a steel supplier or
producer.
SUMMARY OF CHANGES
Committee A05 has identified the location of selected changes to this standard since the last issue
(A792/A792M – 09A) that may impact the use of this standard. (November 1, 2010)
(1) Revised coating weight [mass] to thickness conversion (3) Changed composition in Table 3 for SS Grade 80 class 2.
values in 8.1 to three significant figures. (4) Changed footnote C for Table 3.
(2) Added 5.2.3.1 for default class for grade 80 SS.
ASTM International takes no position respecting the validity of any patent rights asserted in connection with any item mentioned
in this standard. Users of this standard are expressly advised that determination of the validity of any such patent rights, and the risk
of infringement of such rights, are entirely their own responsibility.
This standard is subject to revision at any time by the responsible technical committee and must be reviewed every five years and
if not revised, either reapproved or withdrawn. Your comments are invited either for revision of this standard or for additional standards
and should be addressed to ASTM International Headquarters. Your comments will receive careful consideration at a meeting of the
responsible technical committee, which you may attend. If you feel that your comments have not received a fair hearing you should
make your views known to the ASTM Committee on Standards, at the address shown below.
This standard is copyrighted by ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959,
United States. Individual reprints (single or multiple copies) of this standard may be obtained by contacting ASTM at the above
address or at 610-832-9585 (phone), 610-832-9555 (fax), or [email protected] (e-mail); or through the ASTM website
(www.astm.org). Permission rights to photocopy the standard may also be secured from the Copyright Clearance Center, 222
Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, Tel: (978) 646-2600; http://www.copyright.com/
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Tue May 21 12:06:35 EDT 2019
6
Downloaded/printed by
Univ de los Andes (Univ de los Andes) pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.