Jurnal Makalah Uas
Jurnal Makalah Uas
Jurnal Makalah Uas
net/publication/221917254
CITATION READS
1 2,603
3 authors, including:
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Agustino Martínez-Antonio on 22 May 2014.
1. Introduction
DNA is the polymeric molecule that contains all the genetic information in a cell. This
genetic information encodes the instructions to make a copy of itself, for the cellular
structure, for the operative cellular machinery and also contains the regulatory signals,
which determine when parts of this machinery should be on or off. The operative machinery
in turn, is responsible for the cells functions either metabolically or in interactions with the
environment. Part of this cellular machinery devoted to DNA metabolism is responsible for
DNA replication, DNA-repair and for the regulation of gene expression. In this chapter we
will focus our discussion on the mechanisms and controls that conduct DNA replication in
bacteria, including the components, functions and regulation of replication machinery. Most
of our discourse will consider this biological process in Escherichia coli but when possible we
will compare it to other bacterial models, mainly Bacillus subtilis and Caulobacter crescentus as
examples of organisms with asymmetrical cell division.
In order to maintain a bacterial population it is necessary that cells divide, but before the
physical division of a daughter cell from its mother, it is necessary among other check
points, that the DNA has been replicated accurately. This is done by the universal semi-
conservative replication process of DNA-strands, which generates two identical strand
copies from their parent templates. To better understand this process it has been divided
into three phases: initiation, elongation and termination of DNA replication. In each of these
steps, multiple stable and transient interactions are involved and we have summarized them
below.
final phase, which goes from the end of DNA replication until the completion of cell-
division (Wang & Levine, 2009).
Under the best growing-conditions, DNA replication starts immediately after cell division in
most cells (Wang et al., 2005). Since replication of the chromosome takes more time than that
the necessary for cell division under optimal culture conditions, such as E. coli growing in
rich media, at 37ºC with good aeration, it can happen that more than one event of DNA
replication can occur per cell cycle (Zakrzewska-Czerwinska et al., 2007). For the purposes
of this work we shall divide the DNA replication process in bacteria into three steps:
initiation, elongation and termination as follows.
Fig. 1. Description of the origin of replication in the E. coli chromosome. The origin of
chromosomal replication (oriC) contains three AT-rich repeats (L, M and R), each 13
nucleotide residues long and multiple DnaA-binding sites. There are three higher-affinity
DnaA-boxes R1, R2 an R4 (dark blue) and seven lower-affinity sites Ǖ1, Ǖ2, I1, I2, I3, R5M and
R3 (light blue). All the DnaA-boxes preferentially bind DnaA-ATP rather than DnaA-ADP
complexes. oriC also contains one site where IHF binds (green), one for Fis (gray) and GATC
sites (orange) which are recognized by the Dam enzyme.
associated with a variety of cellular activities). The X-ray structure of crystals of this protein
from Aquifex aeolicus shows that the protein has four distinctive domains (Erzberger et al.,
2002). Domain I serves for the interaction with other proteins, among those identified are:
the replicative DnaB helicase and the DnaA-binding assistance protein DiaA (DnaA-initiator
association). Domain II is a flexible linker, which provides free rotation for the adjacent
domains III and I. Domain III has typical motifs that are characteristic of the AAA+ protein
superfamily of ATPases characterized by a conserved nucleotide phosphate-binding motif,
named Walker A (GxxxxGK[S/T]), where x is any amino acid residue). This domain serves
in protein binding to either ATP or ADP. When DnaA binds ATP it can form multimeric
structures each consisting of 5–7 protomers (DnaA-ATP) by interactions of one subunit with
the ATP of the anterior subunit through their “arginine fingers” as shown in Figure 2. It is
suggested that the DnaA-oriC complex forms a circular pentamer, which is stabilized by
interactions between each DnaA unit as mentioned before. The formation of these
complexes promotes the unwinding of DNA strands on the initiation of replication. Finally,
domain IV of DnaA has a helix-turn-helix motif that allows it to interact with the DnaA-box
of oriC (Figure 2), (Erzberger et al., 2002; Ozaki & Katayama, 2009).
Fig. 2. DnaA as the main protein for the unfolding of DNA strands at oriC. A) The DnaA
protein family is part of the AAA+ ATPases. In E. coli DnaA contains four functional
domains as shown in the diagram. The ATP molecule is shown in red, and the arginine
finger in purple. B) Domain III binds preferentially ATP over ADP, in addition it has an
“arginine finger” which permits the multimerization of these protomers over the DNA.
119 (Figure 1), (Cassler et al., 1995; Ryan et al., 2004). Additional proteins such as DiaA and
HU (Heat unstable protein) bind to domain I of DnaA, contributing to the stabilization of
the joining of their protomers to oriC (Ishida et al., 2004; Chodavarapu et al., 2008). Another
protein, ArgP (arginine protein, also called IciA) binds to the AT-rich regions in L, M and R
boxes blocking the opening of DNA by DnaA (Hwang et al., 1992), this protein binds in the
order of 10-20 monomers per oriC. Mutants in this gene however have no a clear defective
phenotype of DNA replication and possibly this protein is functioning as an additional
mechanism to maintain the robustness of this process. ArgP is also a transcriptional
regulator which counts dnaA among its target genes. The activity of ArgP is regulated
by arginine as its alosteric ligand and the protein is degraded by a specific protease. Another
protein that inhibits the binding of DnaA to its target sequences is CNU (oriC-binding
nucleoid-associated). CNU is a small protein composed of 71 amino acids (8.4 kDa)
that binds to a sequence of 26 bp (named cnb), which overlaps with the binding sites
for DnaA, thereby preventing its binding to oriC (Kim et al., 2005). When DnaA-ATP binds
to oriC it twists the DNA and promotes the separation of DNA-strands in the AT-rich region
to produce a single-stranded bubble or “open complex” (Figure 3). The next step is
the recruitment of the (DnaBC)6 complex to DnaA to obtain the pre-Replicative Complex
preRC.
Four or five DnaA-ATP molecules interact with the (DnaBC)6 complex via the N-terminal of
the replicative DnaB helicase and their common binding to oriC (Seitz et al., 2000). DnaB6 is a
monohexameric helicase with a ring shape. Its function is the unwind of double-stranded
DNA employing the hydrolysis of ATP, this activity is maintained as the elongation phase
proceeds. DnaB6 in its inactive form is found associated with the small protein DnaC (also of
the AAA+ superfamily) forming a closed complex DnaB6-(DnaC-ATP)6, (Biswas & Biswas-
Fiss, 2006).
The DnaB protein should be loaded onto each of the single-stranded DNA (ssDNA)
molecules. For this to happen, the pre-RC needs to release the DnaC from the complex
(DnaBC)6. It has been suggested that the DNA helicase translocates between parental
templates of DNA and interacts via its N-terminal domain with the DnaG primase. The
Mechanisms and Controls of DNA Replication in Bacteria 223
Fig. 3. Formation of the pre-RC. A) Binding of DnaA-ATP to oriC to form multimeric structures
in conjunction with DiaA and (DnaBC)6 via domain I, these interactions are important in order
to form the pre-RC. B) The binding of DnaA-ATP to this region of DNA is favored when the
protein IHF also binds to oriC, about 20 molecules of DnaA-ATP bind to OriC simultaneously.
This DnaA-ATP complex is stabilized by DiaA and finally leads to the unfolding of the DNA
at the AT-rich region. At this stage the (DnaBC)6 complex is attached to domain I of the DnaA-
ATP, forming the pre-RC. Subsequently, DnaB releases DnaC and loads to each single
stranded DNA in direction 5’-3’ with the assistance of the DnaG primase.
The sliding-clamp (ǃ2) is a dimer of DnaN proteins, which binds to the hybrid DNA-RNA
and serves to direct Pol III to this position for the synthesis of Okasaki fragments. During
the elongation phase Pol III can hop from one clamp to another without leaving the
replication fork. So Pol III overcomes possible delays due to blockage of DNA by the activity
of transcription factors or DNA damage (Georgescu et al., 2010).
AAA+ superfamily and therefore can form a ring-shaped multimer that wraps the DNA and
moves along it at the expense of ATP. When a chromosome dimer is present, a site-specific
recombination event by XerCD introduces an additional cross over at dif, resolving thus the
dimer into two monomers, all this is under the control of FtsK (Aussel et al., 2002).
Gene
Protein Gene MWa
Function length Essentialityb
name name (kDa)
(bp)
Initiator of DNA synthesis by binding to the origin of
replication and also acts as a transcriptional
regulator. It binds to DnaA boxes, and binds ATP.
DnaA dnaA 1404 52.551 E
Around 20 to 30 DnaA monomers bind to the oriC
region. It is calculated that around of 1000 molecules
per cell are bound reaching up to 70% DnaA-ATP.
A hexameric DNA helicase, it progressively unwinds
DnaB dnaB DNA strands ahead of replication forks. About 100 1416 52.39 E
DnaB molecules are calculated to be present per cell.
DnaC is an accessory protein that assists the loading
of DnaB onto DNA duplex to initiate replication and
DnaC dnaC onto ssDNA to assist primer formation by the 738 27.935 E
primase. Six DnaC monomers bind to the hexameric
DnaB
DNA primase, it catalyzes the synthesis of RNA
primers on ssDNA. These primers are necessary for
DNA synthesis by DNA polymerase III. A DnaB–
DnaG dnaG DnaG complex was observed by mixing DnaB with a 1746 65.565 E
six molar excess of DnaG (hexamers of DnaB and
monomers of DnaG). Log-phase cells contain 50 to
100 molecules of primase.
DNA polymerase III holoenzyme is the primary enzyme for DNA synthesis in E. coli.
DNA It carries out 5’ to 3' DNA polymerization using ssDNA as a template; it also carries
polymerase III out 3'-5' exonuclease edition of mispaired nucleotides. There are estimated to be 10
holoenzyme holoenzymes of DNA polymerase III per cell.
(Pol III) Pol III holoenzyme is made up of the following components
[(DnaE)(DnaQ)(HolE)]3[(DnaX)3(HolB)(HolA)][(DnaN)2]2[(DnaX)2][(HolC)(HolD)]4.
DNA
The DNA polymerase III core enzyme can carry out the basic polymerase and
polymerase III
exonuclease activities of polymerase III.
(core)
ǂ dnaE ǂ subunit catalyzes DNA polymerization from 5' - 3'. 3483 129.9 E
dž dnaQ dž subunit catalyzes the 3' - 5' proofreading activity 732 27.099 E
Dž' holB Dž' subunit is part of the clamp loader complex. 1005 36.937 E
HU for heat unstable protein, is a global regulatory protein and shares properties
with histones for nucleoid organization and regulation. It is a heterodimer formed by
HU
an ǂ- and a ǃ-subunit. HU reaches 30,000-55,000 dimers in the exponential phase and
10,000-17,000 in the stationary phase.
XerC xerC XerC is part of the Xer site-specific recombination 897 33.868 E
system
XerD xerD XerD is part of the Xer site-specific recombination 897 34.246 NE
system
Fig. 6. Mechanisms that regulate DNA replication in E. coli. A) The newly replicated DNA
duplex is in a hemimethylated state. B) SeqA binds to the hemimethylated GATC sites
immediately after they are replicated. C) RpoD activates the transcription of dam and Dam
methylates GATC sites of the newly synthesized strand. D) HU represses the transcription
of SeqA. E) DnaA binds to the DnaA boxes on the oriC region. F) when there are many
DnaA molecules they repress the transcription of the dnaA gene. G) datA locus binds many
DnaA molecules.
lacks some important components of the regulatory machinery found in E. coli such as the
seqA and dam genes. In their place other players are present in B. subtilis such as Spo0A
(Figure 7) and SirA (sporulation inhibitor of replication) (Katayama et al., 2010). Spo0A is
the master regulator for sporulation and, at the same time, is an inhibitor of DNA
replication. Spo0A is activated by a multicomponent phosphorelay process, this is initiated
by a histidine kinase (KinA), that autophosphorylates, and transfers the phosphate to Spo0A
through two intermediate phosphotransferases (Spo0F and Spo0B), (Burbulys et al., 1991).
Spo0A-P (the active form) binds to specific sites on the oriC region and blocks the
unwinding of the DNA duplex. Spo0A-P activates SirA, and SirA binds to DnaA in Domain
I inhibiting the ability of DnaA to bind to the oriC (Wagner et al, 2009). Sda maintains the
cellular levels of Spo0A-P low when a new round of replication has initiated (Veening et al.,
2009), by inhibiting the accumulation of the autophosphorylated form of KinA
(Cunningham & Burkholder, 2008).
Other regulators also implicated in DNA replication in B. subtilis are Soj and Spo0J (Figure
7), both components are required for proper chromosome segregation and for the repression
of DNA replication. Soj exerts its activity in repressing replication by interacting with DnaA
at the oriC, thereby preventing DnaA from initiating DNA replication (Murray & Errington,
2008). Otherwise Spo0J produces the complex Soj-Spo0J at the parS locus (Autret et al., 2001),
promoting the release of Soj from the DNA strands, and allowing DNA replication to be
initiated (Lee et al., 2003).
Fig. 7. Mechanisms that regulate DNA replication in B. subtilis. A) Soj represses DnaA
activity. B) Spo0J stimulates Soj binding to the parS locus. C) The complex of Soj at the parS
locus promotes the separation of Soj from the DNA. D) DnaA binds the DnaA boxes in the
oriC initiating DNA replication. E) DnaA represses dnaA itself and activates the transcription
of sda. F) Sda inhibits the accumulation of KinA-P. G) KinA activates Spo0A by transferring
a phosphate group to Spo0A. H) Spo0A binds to specific sites in the oriC and represses
replication, it also represses dnaA and spo0J and activates sirA. I) SirA, in turn, binds to
DnaA and represses its binding to the oriC.
DnaA autoregulation,
dnaA gene regulation DnaA, Soj, SirA DnaA, CcrM
promoter methylation
DnaA-ATP/ADP, DnaA-
DnaA regulation DnaA-ATP/ADP
datA sequestration ATP/ADP
Proteolysis - - ClpXP
Table 2. Comparison of the controls that regulate DNA replication in E. coli, B. subtilis and
C. crescentus.
the deprivation of amino acids, carbon, and limitations of nitrogen and phosphate. Under
these conditions the cells suffer a reduction in size and restrict the content of their genetic
information to only one nucleoid per cell (Schreiber et al., 1995).
The signal which triggers the stringent response is mediated by the accumulation of small-
molecule nucleotides. These are guanosine tetra- and penta-phosphates; ppGpp and
pppGpp (Ferullo & Lovett, 2008). These alarmones are synthesized as a response to the
nutritional limitations by the proteins ReIA (synthetase I) and SpoT (synthetase II),
(Bernardo et al., 2006). During the stringent conditions the elongation phase of DNA
replication is inhibited because ppGpp and pppGppp specifically block the activity of the
primase enzyme (DnaG). This is caused by the binding of a phosphate group of ppGpp to
the primase resulting in an allosteric inhibition of the replication complex, the primase
cannot therefore bind to the helicase. High cellular levels (up to millimolar concentrations)
of these small nucleotides completely arrest DNA replication whereas lower levels only
diminish the rate of replication (Wang et al., 2007).
Another path of regulation of DNA replication under a stringent condition is produced by
the fact that the promoter of dnaA is also subject to the stringent response and the
transcription of dnaA is also repressed under these conditions (Chiaramello & Zyskind, 1990;
Levine et al., 1995).
236 Fundamental Aspects of DNA Replication
8. Future perspectives
There are many details pending even in the best studied bacterial models. Some of the
advantages of knowing in detail the replication process and its regulation are the
possibilities for controlling the replication rates in bacteria, for example, to block the DNA
replication of a pathogen or achieve cell-synchronization in bacterial cultures. Using this last
premise, Ferullo et al. (2009), developed a method for synchronizing E. coli cultures, by
treating the bacteria with DL-serine hydroxamate, a structural analogue of the amino acid
serine, this treatment induces a natural stringent response, causing the arrest of the initiation
of DNA replication, once the stringent signal is released, cells initiate a synchronized round
of DNA replication.
Another advantage of knowing the details of the replication process and its regulation is to
allow us to control and use it as a clock in some bio-engineered systems, an example of this
is the ON and OF switch, generated by the methylated or hemimethylated state of DNA in
E. coli (Low & Casadesús, 2008), specially at the GATC sites of the regulatory regions of
many genes and the possibility of timing the replication rate in this organism.
Some organisms with reduced genomes such as the obligate endosymbionts Baumannia
cicadellinicola and Carsonella ruddii, have lost most of the relevant components of the
replicative machinery, such as DnaA. It is suggested that, the lack of DnaA allows the host
to control DNA replication of the symbiont avoiding over-reproduction of the bacteria in its
cytosol (Akman et al., 2002). Another possibility is that DNA replication happens at a low
basal- rate in these stable conditions, in an unrepressed manner. It is postulated that the
association between different organisms leads to adaptation in the rate of DNA replication
of the bacteria in balance with the developmental status of their hosts (Gil et al., 2003).
9. Conclusions
The replication of DNA is a complex process in which a great number of regulators and
mechanisms are involved, one of the most important is the DnaA protein. Replication
normally begins by the formation of a complex of DnaA at the oriC region, with the
assistance of DiaA, and the incorporation of some proteins that form the replisome,
subsequently the formation of the open complex takes place, followed by a complex
238 Fundamental Aspects of DNA Replication
interaction of the proteins needed to execute and complete the DNA replication. The process
finalizes with the recognition of the ter site and disassembly of the replisome. Many of the
proteins are broadly conserved within the bacteria but some special factors are required in
bacteria which undergo particular processes such as asymmetrical cell division.
In general these processes are controlled by a series of circuits, which usually center on the
oriC and affect the activity of DnaA. The result is regulation of the initiation step of DNA
replication. Some of the regulatory mechanisms are time-dependent allowing only one DNA
replication event per cell cycle. The methylation state of the DNA-strands is another
important condition that not only controls the possibility of starting DNA replication but
also regulates the transcription of many genes important for the execution of this function.
All or certain of these mechanisms are adjusted under some special conditions, such as
when the stringent response is triggered by amino acid starvation. In some bacteria with
extremely reduced genomes it is still a mystery as to how DNA replication takes place and
how it is controlled. Many of these latter organisms lack several important proteins
implicated in the control and execution of DNA replication, and these bacteria can be useful
as models for generating a system with the minimal components necessary for DNA
replication.
10. Acknowledgments
Authors thank June Simpson for critical comments to the ms and David Velázquez Ramírez
for assistance with Figures 1-5. This work was supported by CONACYT grant (102854) for
young researchers given to AM-A. CQ-V thanks CINVESTAV-IPN and UAA for a PhD
scholarship and LE-S thanks CONACYT for a PhD scholarship (208153).
11. References
Akman, L., Yamashita, A., Watanabe, H., Oshima, K., Shiba, T., Hattori, M. & Aksoy, S.
(2002). Genome sequence of the endocellular obligate symbiont of tsetse flies
Wigglesworthia glossinidia. Nat Genet, 32, 402–407.
Aussel, L., Barre, F. X., Aroyo, M., Stasiak. A., Stasiak. A. Z. & Sherratt, D. (2002). FtsK Is a
DNA motor protein that activates chromosome dimer resolution by switching the
catalytic state of the XerC and XerD recombinases. Cell. 108, 195-205.
Autret, S., Nair, R., & Errington, J. (2001) Genetic analysis of the chromosome segregation
protein Spo0J of Bacillus subtilis: evidence for separate domains involved in DNA
binding and interactions with Soj protein.Mol Microbiol, 41, 743–755.
Berlatzky, I. A., Rouvinski, A. & Ben-Yehuda, S. (2008). Spatial organization of a replicating
bacterial chromosome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 105, 14136-40.
Bernardo, L. M. D., Johansson, L. U. M., Solera, D., Skärfstad, E., & Shingler, V. (2006). The
guanosine tetraphosphate (ppGpp) alarmone, DksA and promoter affinity for
RNA polymerase in regulation of s54-dependent transcription. Mol Microbiol, 60,
749–764.
Bigot, S., Corre, J., Louarn, J. M., Cornet, F. & Barre, F. X. (2004). FtsK activities in Xer
recombination, DNA mobilization and cell division involve overlapping and
separate domains of the protein. Mol Microbiol, 54, 876-86.
Mechanisms and Controls of DNA Replication in Bacteria 239
Gama-Castro, S., Salgado, H., Peralta-Gil, M., Santos-Zavaleta, A., Muñiz-Rascado, L.,
Solano-Lira, H., Jimenez-Jacinto, V., Weiss, V., García-Sotelo, J., López-Fuentes, A.,
Porrón-Sotelo, L., Alquiciria-Hernández, S., Medina-Rivera, A., Martínez-Flores, I.,
Alquiciria-Hernández, K., Martínez-Adame, R., Bonavides-Martínez, C., Miranda-
Ríos, J., Huerta, A., Mendoza-Vargas, A., Collado-Torres, L., Taboada, B., Vega-
Alvarado, L., Olvera, M., Olvera, L., Grande, R., Morett, E. & Collado-Vides, J.
(2010). RegulonDB version 7.0: transcriptional regulation of Escherichia coli K-12
integrated within genetic sensory response units (Gensor Units). Nucleic Acids Res.,
39, D98–D105.
Gao, D. & McHenry, C. S. (2001). Tau binds and organizes Escherichia coli replication proteins
through distinct domains. Domain III, shared by gamma and tau, binds delta, delta’
and chi psi. J Biol Chem, 276, 4447-53.
Gao, F. & Zhang, C. T. (2007). DoriC: a database of oriC regions in bacterial genomes.
Bioinformatics, 23, 866-867.
Georgescu, R. E., Yao, N. Y. & O'Donnell, M. (2010). Single-molecule analysis of the
Escherichia coli replisome and use of clamps to bypass replication barriers. FEBS
Lett, 584, 2596-605.
Gil, R., Silva, F. J., Zientz, E., Delmotte, F., González-Candelas, F., Latorre, A., Rausell, C.,
Kamerbeek, J., Gadau, J. I, Hölldobler, B., van Ham, R. C., Gross, R. & Moya, A.
(2003). The genome sequence of Blochmannia floridanus: comparative analysis of
reduced genomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 100, 9388–9393.
Gorbatyuk, B. & Marczynski, G. T. (2005). Regulated degradation of chromosome replication
proteins DnaA and CtrA in Caulobacter crescentus. Mol. Microbiol., 55, 1233–1245.
Han, J. S., Kang, S., Kim, S. H., Ko, M. J. & Hwang, S. D. (2004). Binding of SeqA protein to
hemi-methylated GATC sequences enhances their interaction and aggregation
properties. J. Biol. Chem, 279, 30236–30243.
Heidelberg, J. F., Eisen, J. A., Nelson, W. C., Clayton, R. A., Gwinn, M. L., Dodson, R. J.,
Haft, D., Hickey, E., Peterson, J., Umayam, L., Gill, S., Nelson, K., Read, T., Tettelin,
H., Richardson, D., Ermolaeva, M., Vamathevan, J., Bass, S., Qin, H., Dragoi, I.,
Sellers, P., McDonald, L., Utterback, T., Fleishmann, R., Nierman, W.l, White, O.,
Salzberg, S., Smith, H., Colwell, R., Mekalanos, J., Venter, C. & Frase, C. (2000).
DNA sequence of both chromosomes of the cholera pathogen Vibrio cholerae.
Nature, 406, 477-83.
Hung, D. Y., & Shapiro, L. (2002). A signal transduction protein cues proteolytic events
critical to Caulobacter cell cycle progression. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 99, 13160–
13165.
Hwang, D. S., Thöny, B. & Kornberg, A. (1992). IciA protein, a specific inhibitor of initiation
of Escherichia coli chromosomal replication. J Biol Chem., 267, 2209-2213.
Ishida, T., Akimitsu, N., Kashioka, T., Hatano, M., Kubota, T., Ogata, Y., Sekimizu,
K. & Katayama, T. (2004). DiaA, a novel DnaA-binding protein, ensures the timely
initiation of Escherichia coli chromosome replication. J Biol Chem, 279, 45546-
45555.
Mechanisms and Controls of DNA Replication in Bacteria 241
Erzberger, J. P., Pirruccello, M. M. & Berger, J. M. (2002). The structure of bacterial DnaA:
implications for general mechanisms underlying DNA replication initiation EMBO
J., 21, 4763–4773.
Jenal, U. (2009). The role of proteolysis in the Caulobacter crescentus cell cycle and
development. Res Microbiol, 160, 687-695.
Katayama, T., Ozaki, S., Keyamura, K. & Fujimitsu, K. (2010). Regulation of the replication
cycle: conserved and diverse regulatory systems for DnaA and oriC. Nat Rev
Microbiol., 8, 163-170.
Katayama, T. & Sekimizu, K. (1999). Inactivation of Escherichia coli DnaA protein by DNA
polymerase III and negative regulations for initiation of chromosomal replication.
Biochimie, 81, 835-40.
Katayama, T., Kubota, T., Kurokawa, T., Crooke, E. & Sekimizu, K. (1998). The initiator
function of DnaA protein is negatively regulated by the sliding clamp of the E. coli
chromosomal replicase. Cell, 94, 61-71.
Kennedy, S. P., Chevalier, F. & Barre, F. X. (2008). Delayed activation of Xer recombination
at dif by FtsK during septum assembly in Escherichia coli. Mol Microbiol, 68, 1018-
1028.
Kim, M. S., Bae, S. H., Yun, S. H., Lee, H.J., Ji, S. C., Lee, J.H., Srivastava, P., Lee, S. H., Chae,
H., Lee, Y., Choi, B. S., Chattoraj, D. K. & Lim, H. M. (2005). Cnu, a novel oriC-
binding protein of Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 187, 6998-7008.
Kitagawa, R., Ozaki, T., Moriya, S. & Ogawa, T. (1998). Negative control of replication
initiation by a novel chromosomal locus exhibiting exceptional affinity for
Escherichia coli DnaA protein. Genes Dev., 12, 3032-3043.
Laub, M. T., Shapiro, L. & McAdams, H. H. (2007). Systems Biology of Caulobacter. Annu.
Rev. Genet, 41, 429–441.
Lee, P.S., Lin, D.C.-H., Moriya, S., & Grossman, A.D. (2003) Effects of the chromosome
partitioning protein Spo0J (ParB) on oriC positioning and replication initiation in
Bacillus subtilis. J Bacteriol, 185, 1326–1337.
Lee, Y. S., Kim, H. & Hwang, D. S. (1996). Transcriptional activation of the dnaA gene
encoding the initiator for oriC replication by IciA protein, an inhibitor of in vitro
oriC replication in Escherichia coli. Mol Microbiol., 19, 389-396.
Leonard, A. C. & Grimwade, J. E. (2009). Initiating chromosome replication in E. coli: It
makes sense to recycle. Genes Dev, 23, 1145-115.
Lesley, J. A. & Shapiro, L. (2008). SpoT regulates DnaA stability and initiation of
DNA replication in carbon-starved Caulobacter crescentus. J. Bacteriol., 190, 6867–
6880.
Levine, A., Autret, A. & Seror, S. J. (1995). A checkpoint involving RTP, the replication
terminator protein, arrests replication downstream of the origin during the
Stringent Response in Bacillus subtilis. Mol Microbiol, 15, 287–295.
Levine, L., Vannier, F., Dehbi, M., Henckes, G. & Séror, S. J. (1991). The Stringent Response
Blocks DNA Replication Outside the ori Region in Bacillus subtilis and at the Origin
in Escherichia coli. J. Mol. Biol., 219, 605-613.
Lewis, P. J. (2001). Bacterial chromosome segregation. Microbiology, 147, 519-526.
242 Fundamental Aspects of DNA Replication
Low, D. & Casadesús, J. (2008). Clocks and switches: bacterial gene regulation by DNA
adenine methylation. Current opinion in microbiology, 11, 106-12.
Lu, M., Campbell, J. L., Boye, E. & Kleckner, N. (1994). SeqA: a negative modulator of
replication initiation in E. coli. Cell, 77, 413–426.
Makowska-Grzyska, M. & Kaguni, J. M. (2010). Primase directs the release of DnaC from
DnaB. Mol Cell, 37, 90-101.
Marczynski, G. T. & Shapiro, L. (2002). Control of chromosome replication in Caulobacter
crescentus. Annu Rev Microbiol, 56, 625-656.
Mergaert, P., Uchiumi, T., Alunni, B., Evanno, G., Cheron, A., Catrice, O., Mausset, A. E.,
Barloy-Hubler, F., Galibert, F., Kondorosi, A. & Kondorosi, E. (2006). Eukaryotic
control on bacterial cell cycle and differentiation in the Rhizobium-legume
symbiosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 103, 5230-5235.
Messer, W. & Weigel, C. (1997). DnaA initiator Ɇ also a transcription factor. Mol. Microbiol.,
24, 1-6.
Mott, M. L. & Berger, J. M. (2007). DNA replication initiation: mechanisms and regulation in
bacteria. Nature Rev Microbiol., 5, 343-54.
Murray, H. & Errington, J. (2008). Dynamic control of the DNA replication initiation protein
DnaA by Soj/ParA. Cell, 135, 74-84.
Neylon, C., Kralicek, A. V., Hill, T. M. & Dixon, N. E. (2005) Replication termination in
Escherichia coli: structure and antihelicase activity of the Tus-ter complex. Microbiol
Mol Biol Rev., 69, 501-26.
Noirot-Gros, M. F., Velten, M., Yoshimura, M., McGovern, S., Morimoto, T. & Ehrlich, S. D.
(2006). Functional dissection of YabA, a negative regulator of DNA replication
initiation in Bacillus subtilis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 103, 2368– 2373.
Ogura, Y., Ogasawara, N., Harry, E. J. & Moriya, S. (2003). Increasing the ratio of Soj
to Spo0J promotes replication initiation in Bacillus subtilis. J Bacteriol, 185, 6316–
6324.
Ozaki, S., Katayama, T., (2009). DnaA structure, function and dynamics in the initiation at
the chromosomal origin. Plasmid, 62, 71-82.
Reisenauer, A. & Shapiro, L. (2002). DNA methylation affects the cell cycle transcription of
the CtrA global regulator in Caulobacter. EMBO J., 21, 4969–4977.
Reisenauer, A., Kahng, L. S., McCollum, S. & Shapiro, L. (1999). Bacterial DNA methylation:
a cell cycle regulator? J Bacteriol, 181, 5135–5139.
Reyes-Lamothe, R., Sherratt, D. J. & Leake, M. C. (2010). Stoichiometry and architecture of
active DNA replication machinery in Escherichia coli. Science. 328, 498-501.
Rowen, L. & Kornberg, A. (1978). Primase, the dnaG protein of Escherichia coli an enzyme
which starts DNA chains. J Biol Chem, 253, 758-764.
Ryan, V. T., Grimwade, J. E., Camara, J.E., Crooke, E. & Leonard, A.C. (2004). Escherichia coli
prereplication complex assembly is regulated by dynamic interplay among Fis, IHF
and DnaA. Mol Microbiol., 51, 1347-59.
Ryan, K. R. & Shapiro, L. (2003). Temporal and spatial regulation in prokaryotic cell cycle
progresion. Review Literature And Arts Of The Americas, 72, 367-394.
Schaeffer, P. M., Headlam, M. J. & Dixon, N. E. (2005). Protein-protein interactions in the
eubacterial replisome. IUBMB Life. 57, 5-12.
Mechanisms and Controls of DNA Replication in Bacteria 243
Schreiber, G., Ron, E. Z. & Glaser, G. (1995). ppGpp-mediated regulation of DNA replication
and cell division in Escherichia coli. Curr Microbiol., 30, 27-32.
Shamoo, Y. & Steitz, T. A. (1999). Building a replisome from interacting pieces: sliding clamp
complexed to a peptide from DNA polymerase and a polymerase editing complex.
Cell, 15, 155-66.
Stancheva, I., Koller, T. & Sogo, J. M. (1999). Asymmetry of Dam remethylation on the
leading and lagging arms of plasmid replicative intermediates, EMBO J, 18, 6542–
6551.
Stephens, C. M., Zweiger, G. & Shapiro, L. (1995). Coordinate cell cycle control of a
Caulobacter DNA methyltransferase and the flagellar genetic hierarchy. J Bacteriol,
177, 1662–1669.
Su'etsugu, M., Nakamura, K., Keyamura, K., Kudo, Y. & Katayama, T. (2008). Hda
Monomerization by ADP Binding Promotes Replicase Clamp-mediated DnaA-ATP
Hydrolysis. J Biol Chem, 283, 36118–36131.
Swart, J. R. & Griep, M.A. (1995). Primer synthesis kinetics by Escherichia coli primase on
single-stranded DNA templates. Biochemistry, 34, 16097-16106.
Tan, M. H., Kozdon, J. B., Shen, X., Shapiro, L., & McAdams, H. H. (2010). An essential
transcription factor, SciP, enhances robustness of Caulobacter cell cycle regulation.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 107, 18985-18990.
Van de Velde, W., Zehirov, G., Szatmari, A., Debreczeny, M., Ishihara, H., Kevei, Z.,
Wagner, J. K., Marquis, K. A. & Rudner, D. Z. (2009). SirA enforces diploidy by
ihibiting the replication initiator DnaA during spore formation in Bacillus subtilis.
Mol Microbiol, 73, 963–974.
Veening, J., Murray, H. & Errington, J. (2009). A mechanism for cell cycle regulation of
sporulation initiation in Bacillus subtilis. Genes Dev, 23, 1959-1970.
Wang, J. D. & Levin, P. A. (2009). Metabolism, cell growth and the bacterial cell cycle. Nat
Rev Microbiol, 7, 822-827.
Wang, J., Sanders, G. M. & Grossman, A. D. (2007). Nutritional Control of Elongation of
DNA Replication by (p)ppGpp. Cell, 128, 865–875.
Wang, X., Possoz, C. & Sherratt, D. J. (2005). Dancing around the divisome: asymmetric
chromosome segregation in Escherichia coli. Genes Dev., 19, 2367–2377.
Wion, D. & Casadésus, J. (2006). N6-methyl-adenine: an epigenetic signal for DNA–protein
interactions. Nature Rev Microbiol, 4, 183–192.
Wu, L. J. & Errington, J. (1994). Bacillus subtilis SpoIIIE protein required for DNA segregation
during asymmetric cell division. Science, 264, 572–575.
Zakrzewska-Czerwięska, J., Jakimowicz, D., Zawilak-Pawlik, A. & Messer, W. (2007).
Regulation of the initiation of chromosomal replication in bacteria. FEMS Microbiol
Rev, 31, 378-87.
Relevant Links:
http: //biocyc.org/
http://ecocyc.org/
http://ecoliwiki.net/colipedia/index.php/Welcome_to_EcoliWiki
http://regulondb.ccg.unam.mx/
http://www.ebi.ac.uk/uniprot/
http://www.ecogene.org/index.php
244 Fundamental Aspects of DNA Replication
http: //www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/
http: //www.york.ac.uk/res/thomas/index.cfm