UN Response To Terrorism
UN Response To Terrorism
UN Response To Terrorism
Volume 35
Article 3
Issue 3 Winter 2002
Recommended Citation
Rostow, Nicholas (2002) "Before and after: The Changed UN Response to Terrorism Since September 11th," Cornell International Law
Journal: Vol. 35: Iss. 3, Article 3.
Available at: http://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/cilj/vol35/iss3/3
This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship@Cornell Law: A Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Cornell
International Law Journal by an authorized administrator of Scholarship@Cornell Law: A Digital Repository. For more information, please contact
[email protected].
Before and After: The Changed UN
Response to Terrorism since
September 11th
Nicholas Rostowt
Introduction
The United Nations (UN) has always had an ambivalent relationship with
the entire idea of terrorism. Some of its constituent parts (governments
and international civil servants) and influential elements in the UN firma-
ment (would-be governments, non-governmental organizations, and indi-
viduals) have viewed terrorism as a social phenomenon. 1 In contrast,
experts outside the UN view terrorism quite differently. Although they
have had difficulty drafting a precise definition, 2 experts have long agreed
that terrorism is a means-a weapon. 3 Terrorism is not a political move-
t Yale B.A. (1972), Ph.D. (1979), J.D. (1982). Member of the New York and
District of Columbia bars. My Federal government service has included Legal Adviser to
the National Security Council, 1987-93; Staff Director of the Senate Select Committee
on Intelligence, 1999-2000; Charles H. Stockton Professor of International Law, U.S.
Naval War College, 2001; General Counsel, U.S. Mission to the United Nations, 2001-.
The views expressed in this paper are my own and do not necessarily represent those of
the Department of State or the United States Government. I should like to acknowledge
the invaluable assistance of Bridget O'Connor, candidate for J.D., Duke Law School,
2003, in preparing this text for publication.
1. For UN perspectives on terrorism in the mid-1980s, see Abraham D. Sofaer, Ter-
rorism and the Law, 64 FOREIGN AFF. 901, 903-06 (1986). For a more recent reflection
on the UN understanding of terrorism, consider a comment in February 2001 by a
Malaysian representative to the ad hoc committee of the General Assembly created to
draft a comprehensive convention on terrorism. Speaking on behalf of the Organization
of the Islamic Conference, the representative said that a definition of terrorism was
desirable so that terrorism could be "differentiated from the legitimate struggles of peo-
ple under foreign occupation for national liberation, as recognized by the relevant reso-
lutions and declarations of the United Nations." Committee on Terrorism Takes Up Draft
Comprehensive Anti-Terrorism Convention, Press Release, Ad Hoc Committee on Assem-
bly Resolution 51/210, 5th Sess. 19th mtg., U.N. Doc. L/2971 (2001).
2. Terrorism, which dates at least from the French Revolution, has bedeviled those
who would draft a definition. See Walter Laqueur, We Can't Define "Terrorism" but We
Can Fight It, WALL ST. J., July 12, 2002, at A12.
3. Nearly forty years ago, Raymond Aron wrote: "The word terror has been
employed, in our era, in at least four contexts: by the Germans to designate the bombing
of cities, by those seeking to conserve an established power (German occupation offi-
cials in France or French authorities in Algeria) to stigmatize the action of the resistants
or nationalists, by all authors to characterize one of the aspects of totalitarian regimes,
and lastly by usage to designate the relation of dual impotence between the two great
powers [the United States and the Soviet Union] armed with thermonuclear bombs."
RAYMOND ARON, PEACE & WAR: A THEORY OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS 169 (1967). More
recently, Eric Hobsbawm noted that "the democratization or privatization of the means
35 CORNELL INT'L LJ. 475 (2002)
Cornell International Law Journal Vol. 35
ment in and of itself, but a tool used by various movements. Groups from
Ireland to the Philippines, from the Korean Peninsula and Japan to Africa
and the Middle East, from Russia to India, from the United States to South-
east Asia, have turned to terrorism to advance their causes because too
often it has proved effective. Since September 11, 2001, everyone has been
able to see that the use of terrorism crosses national and ethnic bounda-
ries. Even among those who admit that terrorism is a weapon, many have
4
trouble accepting that terrorism should be banned in all circumstances.
This phenomenon has bred misunderstanding about what the UN has said
and what it is doing about the problem; indeed, about whether it sees ter-
rorism as a problem at all and, if so, what kind of problem.
The following pages sketch the UN approach to terrorism and the
impact of the attacks of September 11, 2001 on that approach. In this
context, I shall offer some tentative views about the future political and
lawmaking activity of the UN in regards to terrorism.
of destruction" raised the specter "of violence and wreckage" anywhere. ERIC HOB-
SBAWM, THE AGE OF EXTREMES: A HISTORY OF THE WORLD, 1914-1991 560 (1994).
4. See, e.g., Committee on Terrorism, supra note 1 (quoting Pakistani representative
who stated that it was necessary to take into consideration the Islamic Conference pro-
posal to develop a definition so that terrorist acts could be distinguished from legitimate
struggles for liberation; and quoting the Syrian representative who stated that "terrorism
must be distinguished from the legitimate national struggles against foreign occupa-
tion"). For a fuller discussion of the UN labyrinth, see generally NEW ZEALAND MINISTRY
OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS & TRADE, UNITED NATIONS HANDBOOK (1998).
5. See C. NORTHCOTE PARKINSON, PARKINSON'S LAW AND OTHER STUDIES IN ADMINIS-
TRATiON 2-13 (1957).
2002 The Changed UN Response to Terrorism
12. See generally NEW ZEALAND MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS & TRADE, supra note 4.
13. See PARKINSON, supra note 5, at 2-13.
14. See Organization Chart of the United Nations, available at http://www.un.org/
aboutun/chart.html (last visited Oct. 28, 2002).
15. See United Nations General Information, available at http://www.un.org/
geninfo/ir/ch2/ch2_txt.htm (last visited Oct. 28, 2002).
16. Id.
17. UN Peacekeeping Under Review, BBC News, Aug. 23, 2000, available at http://
news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/world/americas/newsid_892000/892075.stm (last visited
Oct. 27, 2002).
18. Report of the Panel on United Nations Peace Operations, U.N. GAOR, 55th Sess.,
U.N. Doc. A/55/305-S/2000/809. See also BBC News, supra note 17.
2002 The Changed UN Response to Terrorism
contribute forces. 19 After the United States and its coalition 20 partners
overthrew the Taliban in Afghanistan, Annan again turned to Brahimi to
work on developing a new political future in Kabul. He did so with such
success-developing a new government under President Karzai, fashioning
a LoyaJirga (council) that could represent the country as it turned a histor-
ical page, and helping to mold a new political consensus in Afghanistan-
that he made it look easy.
Brahimi is one of the Secretary-General's cadre of Special Representa-
tives, employed in trouble-spots worldwide. Some Special Representatives
have governmental responsibilities. Others engage in difficult and exhaust-
ing diplomacy, trying to prod warring parties toward peace.
In all, the UN system employs more than 64,700 people worldwide,
21
whose interests and views affect, and sometimes shape, policy decisions.
This congeries of actors affects the way the UN historically has approached
the issue of terrorism, and how it continues to exercise its authority today.
It also makes speaking of the "United Nations" difficult; instead, it is
important first to consider which "United Nations" one means. The tapes-
try of interactions among the groups, delegations, bureaucrats, experts,
and NGOs creates expectations for the future and establishes "right"
behavior that can have the practical force of law.
These group dynamics affect how the UN acts on terrorism and,
indeed, almost all other subjects. They frame debates and influence their
outcomes. For example, the work habits of the Secretariat, contracts with
translators, and other exogenous factors affect the Security Council's pace
of work on terrorism.
19. See Special Committee on Peacekeeping Operations Ends Two Day Debate On Need
For Rapid Deployment of Peace Operations, Press Release, Special Comm. on Peacekeep-
ing Operations, 168th and 169th mtgs., U.N. Doc. GA/PK/175 (2002), available at
http://www.un.org/News/Press/docs/2002/GAPK175.doc.htm (last visited Jan. 15,
2003).
20. Report of the Panel on United Nations Peace Operations, supra note 18. See also
BBC News, supra note 17.
21. See United Nations General Information, supra note 15.
22. See Convention on the Physical Protection of Nuclear Material, 1979, 1456
U.N.T.S. 24631.
Cornell International Law Journal Vol. 35
23. See Convention on the Marking of Plastic Explosives for the Purpose of Detec-
tion, Mar. 1, 1991, U.N. Doc. S/22393, available at http://untreaty.un.org/English/Ter-
rorism/Convl0.pdf (last visited Mar. 21, 2003).
24. See, e.g., Convention on Offences and Certain Other Acts Committed on Board
Aircraft, Sept. 14, 1963, 20 U.S.T. 2941, T.I.A.S. No. 6768, 704 U.N.T.S. 219; Conven-
tion for the Suppression of Unlawful Seizure of Aircraft, Dec. 16, 1.970, 22 U.S.T. 1641,
1973 U.N.T.S. 106; Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts against the Safety
of Civil Aviation, Sept. 23, 1971, 24 U.S.T. 564, I.I.A.S. No. 7570, 974 U.N.T.S. 178;
Protocol on the Suppression of Unlawful Acts of Violence at Airports Serving Interna-
tional Civil Aviation, Feb. 24, 1988, reprinted in 27 1.L.M. 627 (1988).
25. See Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts against the Safety of Mari-
time Navigation, Mar. 10, 1988, S. TREATY Doc. No. 101-1 (1988), reprinted in 27 I.L.M.
672 (1988); Protocol for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts against the Safety of Fixed
Platforms Located on the Continental Shelf, Mar. 10, 1988, 1678 U.N.T.S. 304, reprinted
in 27 I.L.M 685 (1988).
26. See Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of Crimes against Interna-
tionally Protected Persons, including Diplomatic Agents, Dec. 14, 1973, 28 U.S.T. 1975,
1035 U.N.T.S. 167.
27. See International Convention Against the Taking of Hostages, Dec. 17, 1979,
1316 U.N.T.S. 206.
28. See generally John F. Murphy, Civil Liability for the Commission of International
Crimes as an Alternative to Criminal Prosecution, 12 HARV. HUM. RTS. J. 1, 24 (1999).
29. See, e.g., Sofaer, supra note 1, at 903.
30. Id. at 904.
2002 The Changed UN Response to Terrorism
31. G.A. Res. 51/210, U.N. GAOR, 51st Sess., U.N. Doc. A/RES/51/210 (1996).
32. See Ad Hoc Committee Established by General Assembly Resolution, available at
http://www.un.org/law/terrorism/ (last visited Jan. 16, 2003).
33. See id.
34. See Report of the Ad Hoc Committee Established by General Assembly Resolu-
tion 51/210 of 17 December, 1996, 6th Sess., U.N. Doc. A/57/37 (2002); Report of the
Ad Hoc Committee Established by General Assembly Resolution 51/210 of 17 Decem-
ber, 1996, 5th Sess., U.N. Doc. A/56/37 (2001); Report of the Ad Hoc Committee Estab-
lished by General Assembly Resolution 51/210 of 17 December, 1996, 4th Sess., U.N.
Doc. A/55/37 (2000); Report of the Ad Hoc Committee Established by General Assem-
bly Resolution 51/210 of 17 December, 1996, 3d Sess., U.N. Doc. A/54/37 (1999);
Report of the Ad Hoc Committee Established by General Assembly Resolution 51/210
of 17 December, 1996, 2d Sess., U.N. Doc. A/53/37 (1998); Report of the Ad Hoc Com-
mittee Established by General Assembly Resolution 51/210 of 17 December, 1996, 1st
Sess., U.N. Doc. A/52/37 (1997). See also Terrorism by Any Definition,WASH. TIMES, July
9, 2002; Mani Shankar Aiyar, No Global War on Terror, UNITED PRESS INT'L, July 6, 2002.
Perhaps if the international community were able to agree on a definition of terrorism,
this fact would mean terrorism had ceased to be a threat.
35. S.C. Res. 1368, U.N. SCOR, 56th Sess., 4370th mtg., U.N. Doc. S/RES/1368
(2001).
36. Id.
Cornell International Law Journal Vol. 35
37. S.C. Res. 1373, U.N. SCOR, 57th Sess., 4385th mtg., U.N. Doc. S/Res/1373
(2001).
38. U.N. CHARTER art. 25.
39. S.C. Res. 1373, supra note 37.
40. See, e.g., Secretary-General,Addressing Assembly on Terrorism, Calls for 'Immedi-
ate, Far-Reaching Changes' in UN Response to Terror, Press Release, United Nations Gen-
eral Assembly SG/SM/7977 GA/9920 (Oct. 1, 2001). It is not clear that a few weeks
later the influence of September 11 had not so diminished as to render it impossible to
achieve another similar resolution had it been sought.
41. S.C. Res. 1373, supra note 37, 6. See also Jeremy Greenstock, Chair of the
Counter-Terrorism Committee, Presentation at the "Combating International Terrorism:
The Contribution of the United Nations" Symposium in Vienna, Austria Uune 3-4,
2002) available at http://www/un.org/Docs/sc/committees/1373/ViennaNotes.htm
(last visited Mar. 20, 2003).
42. See generally www.un.org/Docs/sc/committees/1373 (last visited Mar. 20,
2003).
43. S.C. Res. 1373, supra note 37, 9 6.
2002 The Changed UN Response to Terrorism
44
Chair regularly briefs the entire UN membership on the CTC's activities.
He believes in maximum transparency as a good in itself and, in the case of
the CTC, necessary to maintain its legitimacy within the UN community.
He uses these occasions to stress the CTC's fidelity to Resolution 1373,
often noting that document is the CTC's "Bible."
The Resolution calls on States to report the steps they are taking to
implement the Resolution. These reports generally cover counter-terrorism
measures in seven areas: legislation, financial asset controls, customs,
45
immigration, extradition, law enforcement, and illegal arms trafficking.
Almost all Members of the UN reported to the CTC in the first year. To
expedite analysis of these reports, the CTC divided itself into three sub-
committees. Each of the sub-committees works toward processing five
reports a week. Experts in relevant subjects aid the sub-committees by,
among other things, drafting the CTC response to the initial reports. The
experts have proved invaluable and integral to the CTC process, assisting
with the continuing need to fully probe countries' responses. 4 6 For exam-
ple, when a country asserts, "money laundering is illegal so no money
laundering takes place," the experts reply, "we need to know how this law
is implemented," or "how do you monitor to ensure that no money launder-
ing takes place?" The experts' external, non-political role helps the CTC
obtain real answers.
The sub-committees draft (and the full Committee approves) letters
back to the reporting States, saying, "Thank you for the information you
provided; we still need additional information on the following issues ... "
Thus, the response letters vary greatly by State, depending on the specific-
ity of the first report. For example, one country submitted a single-spaced,
58-page report, with relevant appendices. The CTC response was able to
discuss intricate details of the country's banking system. In contrast, some
reports have been sketchy. 47 In such cases, the CTC has responded with a
tutorial on how to understand the obligations of Resolution 1373 and how
to meet the needs of the CTC. This practice has prompted some criticism
about whether the CTC treats some states unfairly by holding them to a
different standard based on their level of development. However, dispari-
ties are an inevitable and a necessary aspect of the CTC's work. There is no
point of completion when the committee will issue a certificate of compli-
ance that a State has become "Terrorism-Proof."4 8 The CTC's task has
been to ensure, to the extent possible given its resources, that each State is
making its best efforts to eliminate opportunities for terrorists to establish
themselves in its territory. 49 The CTC's work with Member States through
the review process has helped individual States learn how best to
strengthen their counter-terrorism capabilities and has gone far in creating
a more universal, "best practices" in the global fight against terrorism.
The open-ended dialogue between the CTC and the Member States has
evolved and matured. The Committee has developed standardized ques-
tions. These are not published. But the responses are public, available on
the internet. As a result, the CTC has created the basis for anyone indepen-
dently to develop a matrix evaluating every State's assessment of its imple-
mentation of Resolution 1373. Such action ought to help the international
community increase incentives for fulfilling 1373 obligations, thus
strengthening the world's capacity to combat terrorists and terrorism.
Resolution 1373 does not include a definition of terrorism. As a
result, every country is left to define terrorism for itself, and the Resolution
can instead focus on raising the capacity and the capability to fight terror-
ism-leaving other UN bodies and multi-lateral groups to argue about what
is and what is not terrorism.50 The CTC fulfills its mandate by trying to
make countries honestly assess their own counter-terrorism policies and
capacities. In the case of States that are unwilling to characterize as terror-
ist activities in pursuit of certain goals, the CTC is able to highlight the
inconsistencies such an approach can engender. For example, the CTC can
call attention to tensions arising from a State's different international obli-
gations, particularly conflicts between obligations under UN conventions
5
and provisions in regional conventions that address the same subject. '
The Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights has
expressed concern that the war on terrorism not be exploited for political
advantage by allowing governments wrongly to incarcerate political oppo-
nents.5 2 The Office has asked the CTC to monitor respect for human
rights in connection with States' implementation of Resolution 1373. As
the CTC Chair told the Security Council in public session in January and
July 2002, the CTC is mindful of human rights in its work and values com-
munication with the Office of the High Commissioner. 53 But, the Chair-
man said, the CTC cannot and must not stray from its mandate in
Resolution 1373. Therefore, the CTC does not view itself as a human
rights monitoring body and leaves such work to others. 5 4 In addition, as
some representatives, on the CTC have noted, Resolution 1373 is, in
essence, a call to implement a regime of law. If Resolution 1373 is properly
implemented, the rule of law will be strengthened. In turn, human rights,
which depend on the rule of law for their consistent vindication, will be
strengthened.
After one year in operation, the CTC's future direction and goals
remain in a process of step-by-step clarification. The CTC could be enor-
mously effective. Its influence extends from helping countries adopt laws
regarding the abuse of charitable institutions and other devices to elude
financial regulations, to encouraging enhanced border security training
using multilateral fora, to assisting governmental organizations in the
counter-terrorism area, among other things. Conceivably, the CTC could
help the international community reach agreement on a constructive defi-
nition of terrorism. On the other hand, even States that strongly oppose
terrorism express concern from time to time about the CTC's potential to
scour deeply into a government's innermost activities.
In monitoring implementation, the CTC aims to improve worldwide
counter-terrorism capabilities and to help match countries that need assis-
tance in this area with assistance providers. Thus, it serves as a switch-
board. Even countries with substantial counter-terrorism capacity need
help, if only in the area of understanding their own vulnerabilities.
Through the CTC process and interactions with regional and sub-regional
groups, countries that have not thought of themselves as capable of provid-
ing counter-terrorism assistance are now looking at their capabilities in a
new light. For example, some small countries have great expertise in regu-
lating and monitoring financial transactions. Other countries need train-
ing in these fields. A match may be possible, fostered by the CTC. In
addition, the dialogue between States and the CTC may allow the CTC to
indicate areas in which the CTC believes a State needs assistance, even if
the State does not view itself in that light. Further, the CTC believes that it
can help regional and sub-regional organizations 5 5 leverage scant assis-
tance resources, in part because these organizations can help tailor such
resources to the needs of their particular region.
As part of the process of building a database on worldwide, counter-
terrorism assistance capabilities, in November 2001 the CTC invited all
States with the capacity to do so to contribute to the compilation of a
database of sources of advice and expertise in the areas of legislative and
administrative practice. Using this information, the Committee created a
web-based directory for assistance in the areas of activity covered by Reso-
B. Sanctions
The Security Council was ready to respond to the terrorist acts of Septem-
ber 11 because it had already decided that terrorism constitutes an appro-
priate subject for its consideration and action. The Council had already
spent several years addressing issues related to terrorism in Taliban-ruled
Afghanistan 57 and, before that, in Libya after the bombing of Pan Am Flight
103 in December 1988.58 In August 1998, the Security Council con-
demned the attacks on UN personnel in the Taliban-held territories of
Afghanistan. 59 Later that year, the Council demanded that the Taliban
stop providing sanctuary and training to international terrorists and halt
the cultivation and production of, and trafficking in, illegal drugs.60 Then,
in October 1999, under the Presidency of Russia, 6 1 the Security Council
acted in response to several bombings of apartment buildings in Moscow
62
for which the Russian government blamed Chechen terrorists.
On October 15, 1999, the Security Council adopted Resolution 1267,
imposing sanctions on Usama bin Laden and Taliban-controlled Afghani-
stan, and the Security Council created a Committee of the Whole Council
to administer the resolution's implementation. 6 3 This Resolution obligated
all States to freeze Taliban assets and to deny permission for any Taliban-
affiliated aircraft to depart or ]and from their territory. The Resolution
directed the Committee to designate funds to be frozen and aircraft to be
denied take-off or landing rights. Because these measures are decision of
the Security Council under Chapter VII of the UN Charter, they are
mandatory on all States. 64 After the removal of the Taliban from power in
65. S.C. Res. 1390, U.N. SCOR, 4452d mtg., U.N. Doc. S/RES/1390 (2002).
66. See UN, Annan receive Nobel Peace Prize at award's centennial ceremony in Oslo,
UN News Service, Dec. 10, 2001, availableat http://www.un.org/apps/news/printnew-
sAr.asp?nid=2368 (last visited Jan. 16, 2003); UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan,
Address at the Nobel Peace Prize Ceremony in Oslo, Norway (Dec. 10, 2001), available
at http://www.un.org/News/Press/docs/2001/sgsm8071.doc.htm (last visited Jan. 16,
2003).
67. See Words Alone Inadequate as Response to Terrorist Attacks, Secretary-General
Tells Opening of Fifty-Sixth General Assembly, Press Release, U.N. GAOR, U.N. Doc. SG/
SM/7951 GA/9906 (2001), available at http://www.un.org/News/Press/docs/2001/
sgsm7951.doc.htm (last visited Jan. 16, 2003).
Cornell International Law Journal Vol. 35
the terrorists themselves and against all those who give them any kind of
shelter, assistance or encouragement. '68 On October 1, 2001, while urging
States to conclude a Comprehensive Convention on Terrorism, he said:
It will also be important to obtain agreement on a comprehensive convention
on international terrorism. In the post-11 September era, no one can dis-
pute the nature of the terrorist threat, nor the need to meet it with a global
response. I understand that there are outstanding issues, which until now
have prevented agreement on this convention. Some of the most difficult
issues relate to the definition of terrorism. I understand and accept the need
for legal precision. But let me say frankly that there is also a need for moral
clarity. There can be no acceptance of those who would seek to justify the
deliberate taking of innocent civilian life, regardless of cause or grievance. If
there is one universal principle that all peoples can agree on, surely it is
69
this.
His speech became the basis for his personal engagement in an effort, in
late autumn 2001, to push States to reach agreement. That effort so far has
failed.
The international effort to combat terrorism is over thirty years old. It
came close to agreement on a generally applicable definition of terrorism in
the immediate aftermath of the attacks of September 11, 2001. Despite the
personal efforts of the Secretary-General acting as a facilitator, prod, and
moral conscience, the Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC), con-
sisting of 57 Islamic Member States of the UN, could not agree with the rest
of the international community on what terrorism is. The differences are
70
emblematic of the history of international discussions on terrorism.
First, the OIC wants to exclude acts directed against foreign occupation
from the terrorist label. In 2001, the reasons did not need to be declared:
the OIC wanted to exempt terrorism against Israel and terrorism against
India over Kashmir. 71 Second, the OIC wanted to brand violations of the
laws of war by State military forces as terrorist. This goal is aimed at the
Israel Defense Forces. All countries with large armies objected. Violations
of the laws of war are war crimes; they are not ipso facto acts of terrorism.
68. Id.
69. Secretary-General,Addressing Assembly on Terrorism, Calls for 'Immediate, Far-
Reaching Changes' in UN Response to Terror, Press Release, U.N. GAOR, U.N. Doc. SG/
SM/7977 GA/9920 (Oct. 1, 2001), available at http://www.un.org/News/Press/docs/
2001/sgsm7977.doc.htm (last visited Jan. 18, 2003).
70. The differences are also symptomatic of divisions among OIC member states.
For a recent and powerful example of a secular Muslim leader loosing out to the radicals
in the OIC, compare the opening speech of Malaysian Prime Minister Mahathir
Mohamad at the OIC Conference on April 1, 2002, in which he opposed terrorism
against innocents, see Carla Anne Robbins et al., Hazardous Conflict: Violence in Mideast
is Testing the Limits of U.S. War on Terror, WALL ST. J., Apr. 2, 2002, at Al, with the
Conference conclusions, which rejected the Malaysian Prime Minister's view and
retained the OIC's boilerplate language on terrorism, see Rohan Sullivan, Muslims Shy
from Defining Terrorism, CHICAGo TRIB., Apr. 4, 2002, at 3.
71. See, e.g., Statements in Security Counsel Meeting to Combat Terrorism, Press
Release, U.N. SCOR, U.N. Doc. SC/7638 (Jan. 20, 2003) (reiterating, in part, Syria's
view that the international community should define terrorism and distinguish between
it and a struggle for freedom); Committee on Terrorism, supra note 1.
2002 The Changed UN Response to Terrorism