THE KASHMIR CONFLICT

INTRODUCTION
Kashmir is a landlocked area in South Asia, bordering India, Pakistan, Afghanistan and China.
It is spread over a territory of 86,000 square miles, a region greater than 87 sovereign nations.
Kashmir is home to very nearly thirteen million individuals. In spite of the fact that for the
most part Muslim, the state additionally has critical Hindu, Buddhist and Sikh populaces. In
any case, fear based oppression and an outskirt question among India and Pakistan have given
this very heaven the name 'hell'.

So as to comprehend the present circumstance in Kashmir, it is important to comprehend the

historical backdrop of the locale. The British offered Kashmir to Maharajah Ghulab Singh in
1846. Accordingly, Maharajah Ghulab Singh built up himself as the autonomous regal leader
of Kashmir. This was done through the well known arrangement of Amritsar. After Ghulab
Singh's demise, his kingdom passed on to his successors and was eventually managed by
Maharajah Hari Singh until 1949. In the year 1947, the South Asian part of the British Empire
was separated among India and Pakistan. Maharajah Hari Singh was encouraged to think about
bordering domain, religious and ethnic issues when choosing which region to agree to. The two
India and Pakistan connected strain to get Hari Singh to agree to them respectively. However,
Maharajah Hari Singh stayed unbiased and did not consent to either domain. Accordingly,
Pakistan endeavoured to attach Kashmir.

Now, the Maharajah made an idea to consent to the Indian association in return for insurance
by Indian powers. India concurred and sent its troops to Kashmir, starting off the main war
between the two nations. This intrusion by Pakistan and the ensuing war in1948 lead to the
production of a profoundly flimsy and perilous competition in the Indian subcontinent.

WHAT WAS THE REASON BEHIND THE CONFLICT

Kashmir is deliberately essential to India and Pakistan. Kashmir furnishes Pakistan with much
required waters to flood the ripe fields of Punjab.As an outcome, control of the progression of
water in these streams through dams and channels has been a significant issue for a
considerable length of time.

Furthermore, the Silk Route, the essential land connect among Pakistan and China goes through
Kashmir. This is critical on the grounds that China has fringe questions with India and is
likewise a noteworthy discretionary and military partner for Pakistan. The Silk course enables
China to keep up a forceful stance towards India, its greatest local adversary. A case showing
the key significance of the Silk Route was when Pakistan revived the street in 1965.

Besides its vital and political significance, Pakistan and India both case Kashmir on account of
social and social reasons. Accordingly, Kashmir has come to speak to high stakes for the two
nations as far as national pride.

INTERNATIONAL CRIMES THAT WERE COMMITTED

Crime against humanity:

Criminal Violations against humankind (crime against humanity) is characterized on account

of Prosecutor v Tadić, and furthermore verbalized by a scholastic, Werel as 'assaults
coordinated at a non-military personnel populace; a gathering of individuals connected by
shared qualities.

The Rome Statute of The International Criminal Courts, Article 7 conceptualized the
importance of violations against mankind(humanity) as recognizing the accompanying;
"assault/attack", to mean various charged viciousness, this additionally reaches out to
"different/multiple" dispatched and goes about as distinguished in Article 7(1) coordinated as
at a non- military personnel populace, related/conducted by the Government or authoritative
approach.

The International Covenant on Civil Political Rights (ICCPR) which both the hosts have
approved , Article 6 solely forbids any type of break from privilege of right to life, this
incorporates imposing a state of 'emergency'. Moreover the ICCPR also crealry narrates any
obtuse and inhumane/degrading treatment, which incorporates any form of torment or torture.
The ICCPR gives an extent of authenticity to the military and paramilitary activities, as Article
9 (1) gives that 'no individual will be captured self-assertive' which is revered in standard global
law, this is likewise perceived in Rome Statute Article 7(e). A residential authoritative
impediment which hypothetically gives the military/paramilitary more power in detain anyone.

Furthermore, it tends to be held that India is in break of 1946 Geneva Convention which has
been ratified by India which 'denies the killing of civilians in conflicts', torment and abuse of
non-soldiers. In any case, India does not meet the 'prerequisite as the conflict perhaps above
'law and order' yet is underneath non-global furnished conflict.

The Indian legislation adopted The Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act which give officers
significant/unauthoritive powers, for example in Article 4(a) enables the military to utilize
power to the degree to cause death, on a simple doubt, and this gives the military and the
paramilitary complete insusceptibility from law and order and complete immunity from
prosecution. Initially this act was brought in 1958 to stop any a movement asking for the right
of self- determination. , which “has enabled serious human rights violations to be committed
by soldiers in Jammu & Kashmir

Since the law was passed, India's military and militia have been accused of using torture
methods, but Article 7(2)(e)35 defines torture. " The defendant's detention or management of
a person with severe pain or suffering, physical or mental intentional effects”. In addition, the
Indian army and paramilitary forces are accused of mass rape. In order for rape to meet the
requirements of Article 7(1)g, it must be subjected to a wide-ranging systematic attack on
civilians.

Although security forces and militants were guilty of rape. Rape is said to have been used as a
weapon of war against residents of Kashmir. Frequent rape of Kashmiri Muslim women by
Indian state security forces is routinely not punished. According to a 1993 report by Human
Rights Watch, security forces used rape as a method of retaliating against Kashmiri civilians
during a counter-attack after a militant attack. There was no rape in Kashmir resulting from a
few disorderly troops but an active strategy in the security forces to frighten and frighten the
Kashmiri people. Human rights bodies say 150 high-level officers, at a larger or higher level,
have been involved in religious fighting as well as sexual violence and the Indian government
introduced such activities.

MODE OF TRANSITIONAL JUSTICE

The starting point of transitional justice as an idea can be followed to the foundation of the
International Military Tribunal at Nuremberg, different projects in Germany to counter the
effect of the Nazi system, and the preliminaries of Japanese fighters in light of the human rights
misuses and barbarities of the Second World War. For strife ridden social orders especially
those confronting distress because of ethnic and religious variables, challenges rise above the
standard settling of past maltreatment—this, for instance, is all around reported in Nepal and
Sri Lanka, the two of which are post-conflict states.

There are enormous quantities of unfortunate casualties who are uprooted, underestimated,
debilitated, bereaved, and stranded—every one of whom have hearty cases for retributive
justice that request consideration

A multi-pronged technique for compromise has developed, which incorporated the

commencement of discourse among India and Pakistan just as between New Delhi and
Kashmir. These discussions accumulated force with the increase of the National Democratic
Alliance (NDA) to government in India in 1998. The NDA government facilitated harmony
endeavors, remarkably with a notable transport venture from New Delhi to Lahore on 20
February 1999 with Indian Prime Minister Atal Behari Vajpayee ready.

In October 2003, India proposed a progression of certainty building measures went for
improving interchanges by street, rail and ocean among India and Pakistan. On 26 November
2003, India declared a truce on the separating line in Kashmir. Since its creation in 1949, this
region had stayed tense, encountering border-shelling and discharging all through occasions of
dynamic clash and times of peace.22 Despite reports of infrequent infringement, the continuous
truce is noteworthy as the principal formal truce understanding among India and Pakistan since
the flare-up of militancy in Jammu and Kashmir in late 1980s

On the sidelines of the 2004 South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC)
summit meeting, India and Pakistan communicated their readiness to take part in a composite
exchange went for the quiet settlement of every single respective issue, including Kashmir

On 19 November 2000, India declared a one-sided ceasefire in Jammu and Kashmir went for
convincing activists to revoke brutality and join the harmony process. This ceasefire activity
was expanded twice, and went on until 26 February 2001. Notwithstanding, from that point
forward, New Delhi has declined any further ceasefire augmentations.
Establishment of Working Groups During the second round table gathering in Srinagar in May
2006 the Indian Prime Minister reported the foundation of five working gatherings in charge
of investigating different hostile issues. A nearby investigation of the exercises of these
working gatherings obviously demonstrates how they uphold, but verifiably, an expansive
vision of transitional justice with more extensive legitimate, political and financial
ramifications.

Zero Tolerance of Human Rights Violations: One of the core objectives of transitional justice
is to prevent human rights violations and bring to justice the perpetrators of past violations.
Like many other conflicts, the conflict in Kashmir has been marked by serious human rights
violation

CONCLUSION
Taking everything into account, it tends to be expressed that an answer for the continuous
conflict in Jammu and Kashmir is difficult to settle, notwithstanding the redesigning instances
of violations against humankind that host been submitted by all gatherings to the conflict. On
the proof gave above, it is indefinable that there is sufficient proof which indicates that
gatherings the conflict have disregarded global law. As set up, the probability of a referral to
be made by different gatherings to the Rome Statute is profoundly improbable because of
evasion to cut off political connection, this makes equivocalness in finding goals to the conflict
in Kashmir. Regardless of the political connection between the gatherings of this conflict, the
local populace endure the outcomes and face the repercussions of the continuous conflict,
which undermines the centre thought of the Rome Statute. Hence, it tends to be prescribed that
the United Nation plays a functioning job in endeavouring to fathom the debate because of its
fairness

With regards to the Kashmir locale, it should be valued that the transitional justice measures
talked about here are in their underlying stages. There is a need to move past detailing
regularizing standards towards the genuine usage of measures and proposals so as to encourage
the progress procedure. Named as one of 'the most perilous potential atomic conflicts on the
planet', the locale is yet to observe harmony in its last sixty-three years of presence.

Appropriation of this philanthropic transitional methodology supplemented with a certified

exertion to execute the different complimentary measures, is the path towards making
transitional justice a reality in Kashmir. An unobtrusive base has been built up for a smooth
progress. The basic presently is to develop on that base in a continuous and supportable way.
•Dubbed as one of 'the most perilous potential atomic conflicts on the planet', the locale is yet
to observe harmony in its last sixty three long periods of presence

Bibliography

Al-Ali, Nadje, and Khalid Koser. New approaches to migration?: Transnational communities and the
transformation of home. Routledge, 2003.

Werbner, Pnina. "The place which is diaspora: citizenship, religion and gender in the making of chaordic
transnationalism." Journal of ethnic and migration studies 28.1 (2002): 119-133.

Werbner, Pnina. "Divided loyalties, empowered citizenship? Muslims in Britain." Citizenship Studies 4.3
(2000): 307-324.

Bose, Sumantra. Kashmir: Roots of conflict, paths to peace. Harvard University Press, 2009.

Farrell, Brian. "The Role of International Law in the Kashmir Conflict." Penn St. Int'l L. Rev. 21 (2002):
293.

Widmalm, Sten. Kashmir in comparative perspective: Democracy and violent separatism in India.
Routledge, 2014.

Tavares, Rodrigo. "Resolving the Kashmir conflict: Pakistan, India, Kashmiris and religious militants."
Asian Journal of Political Science 16.3 (2008): 276-302.

Philpott, Daniel. "Religion, reconciliation, and transitional justice: The state of the field." Available at
SSRN 1417034 (2007).

Forsythe, David P. "Human rights and mass atrocities: Revisiting transitional justice." International
Studies Review 13.1 (2011): 85-95.

Askin, K. D. (2002). The quest for post-conflict gender justice. Colum. J. Transnat'l L., 41, 509.