Isis Curriculum: Team Training: Unanticipated Difficult Airway
Isis Curriculum: Team Training: Unanticipated Difficult Airway
Isis Curriculum: Team Training: Unanticipated Difficult Airway
Team Training:
Unanticipated
Difficult
Airway
Created: July 1, 2006
Modified: August 19, 20198
CURRICULUM OUTLINE
1 Contact Information
2 Description of Curriculum
3 Target Trainees
6 Instructor Notes
8 Cognitive Training
9 Skill Training
10 Equipment Setup
00
11 Assessment Methods
1
12 Appendices
1
Team Training: Unanticipated Difficult Airway 2
1. Contact Information
Stefan Lombaard, MD
Assistant Professor
Department of Anesthesiology
Box 356540, School of Medicine
University of Washington
1959 NE Pacific Street
Seattle, WA 98195
Email: [email protected]
Pager: 206-559-1673
Julia Metzner, MD
Assistant Professor
Department of Anesthesiology
Box 356540, School of Medicine
University of Washington
1959 NE Pacific Street
Seattle, WA 98195
Email: [email protected]
Pager: 206-541-4938
Megan Sherman
Program Coordinator
Institute for Surgical and Interventional Simulation
Box 356410, School of Medicine
University of Washington
1959 NE Pacific Street
Seattle, WA 98195
Email: [email protected]
Phone: 206-598-7779
Course Overview:
The patient experiences pain after the surgery has started due to the tourniquet
and, as result of injudicious sedation, becomes apnoeic and starts to
desaturate. The patient simulator is placed in a state where it is impossible to be
ventilated or intubated. The resident should recognize the seriousness of the
situation and call for help. The ‘attending anesthesiologist’ should proceed
according to American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) unanticipated difficult
intubation guidelines, and eventually perform a cricothyroidotomy.
The secondary goal will be for the more junior resident (R2) to be able to
perform intrathecal anesthesia. This includes reviewing the patient history and
physical examination, especially an airway examination and discussing informed
consent regarding the potential benefits and risks of a spinal anesthetic
including the potential for a failed regional which may require general
anesthesia. They should also be able to set up and perform the procedure using
the appropriate monitoring.
The goal of this course is to provide the learner with an opportunity to manage a
life threatening airway emergency which plays out in real time, where the correct
steps need to be taken in a limited period of time. Key elements include: 1)
evaluating the preoperative airway, even though the procedure is performed
under a regional anesthetic (note that the difficult airway will be unrecognized),
2) recognizing the need to call for assistance early in an event, 3) being able to
use various alternative techniques for airway management, and 4) optimizing
resource management skills.
Secondary: N/A
Objective 3d – Cricothyroidotomy
The learner should be able to demonstrate competency in performing a
cricothyroidotomy in an emergency situation.
Objective 4b - Laryngoscopy
The learner should be able to use a laryngoscope and additional devices
such as a stylette, appropriately.
Goal 5: Extubation
After stabilizing the patient with a surgical airway, the learner should present a
plan for further management of the patient. The learner should be able to
discuss what they would do postoperatively when the patient is ready to be
extubated. (ACGME Competencies: Medical Knowledge 1, Patient Care2,
Interpersonal and Communication Skills 3, System-based Practice5,
Practice-based Learning6)
4. Debriefing
Please refer to section B for detailed debriefing notes.
Participants are accompanied to the debriefing room. A video recording
is available to review key parts of the simulation.
Key points for the debriefing:
Facilitate the discussion rather than giving a lecture,
Learners should discuss why they chose certain courses of action
and discuss the consequences. Ask what they would do the same or
differently if they did the same scenario again,
Engage everyone in the discussion particularly quiet team members.
Key topics for discussion should include:
Sedation in a patient with a full stomach,
Spinal anesthesia,
Doing a rapid sequence induction,
Management of a "Cannot intubate, cannot ventilate" emergency.
Briefly review the ASA guidelines for managing a difficult airway. Every
participant receives a copy of the current guidelines.
Briefings:
1. The course will include a brief introduction to the simulator. Learners are asked to
not disclose the details of the scenario to other residents, and also to refrain from
discussing each other’s performance outside of the simulation environment.
6. The patient should be anxious and complain about pain as the learners enter the
room. The patient should request more sedation.
7. The surgeon should prep & drape the field after the spinal block is established,
and then proceed with mock surgery. He or she will be unable to perform surgical
airway if requested but may be of assistance for any other tasks.
The Case:
Instructor #1 will hand over care of the patient to all participants, except
Doctor #2. Doctor #1 (“Attending”) & Doctor 2 (“Resident”) will need to
introduce themselves to the patient and confirm the pre-assessment by
completing a focused history & examination including airway assessment.
The two will need to discuss how they would go about performing spinal
anesthesia including IV access, monitoring equipment, emergency drugs &
emergency equipment, etc.
Rhythm: sinus
HR: 83 bpm
BP: 150/90
Sat: 96%
RR: 20/min
This will be done using the spinal simulator. The learner should describe the
steps he/she will complete, as if this were a real patient. He/she should set
up a spinal tray and then perform a spinal. The learner should be able to
describe pertinent anatomy.
(If the residents are junior, the instructor would go through the correct
procedure for setting up the tray.)
IV line in situ
ECG, Pulse oximeter & NIBP in situ
O2 Mask on face with ETCO2 sample line attached
The “Patient”
The surgeon places a tourniquet, preps & drapes field & (eventually) starts
operating.
After a period the patient starts complaining of pain in his leg related to the
tourniquet and requests more sedation until he becomes unresponsive and
apnoeic.
The events should be the same if the resident does a rapid sequence
intubation.
START TIMER
Rhythm sinus
HR 80 ramp up to 120 bpm
BP 150/95 ramp up to 170/100
O2 Sat 95% ramp to 90% over 3 min
then down to 80% over 1 min
RR apnea
ETCO2 0 mmHg
Rhythm sinus
HR 120 bpm ramp down to 30bpm + ventricular ectopic
beats
BP 170/100 ramp down to 64/35
O2 Sat 90% ramp down to 60%
RR apnea
ETCO2 0 mmHg
Rhythm sinus
HR ramp to 90 bpm
BP ramp to 140/95
O2 Sat ramp up to 95% over 3 minutes
RR 15/min
ETCO2 70 mmHg
Room Set-Up:
Equipment:
Spinal Simulator
Spinal tray with drugs
Surgery equipment incl. drapes, tourniquet
Patient History and Physical Sheet on Clip Board
Anesthesia Machine
Code cart (hidden or outside OR)
Difficult Airway Kit (hidden or outside OR)
Pre-test Only
Team Evaluation
PMH:
DM – diet controlled
Hypertension (controlled on Rx)
High cholesterol
Anxiety
Occasional reflux after meals
Medications:
Clonazepam 0.5mg nocte
Felodipine
Ranitidine 150mg bd
Social:
Occasional alcohol
Ex smoker. 30 pack year history.
No allergies.
Examination:
VITAL SIGNS: Pulse 90 bpm, BP 155/95, oxygen saturation 96% on room air. He
weighs 94 kg and is 175cm tall.
GENERAL: He is a fit looking male, uncomfortable from pain in his leg, but otherwise in
no distress.
AIRWAY: Malampati III, Thyromental distance 6 cm. Good mouth opening. Cx spine:
full range of motion. Normal teeth.
The patient is extremely anxious. He has heard that general anesthesia is dangerous
and insists on the procedure being performed under spinal anesthetic.
Team Training: Unanticipated Difficult Airway 23
Appendix B: Debriefing Questions
Debriefing Questions. General points:
The Basic Assumption for the debriefing is:
We believe that everyone participating in the simulation scenario is intelligent, well-
trained, cares about doing their best, and wants to improve.
Critique the performance, not the individual
Ask open ended questions – avoid yes/no questions
1) What happened?
Participants often want to know "the answer"
Stick to the facts
2) How did you feel about that?
Accept expressions of feelings
- Acknowledge is not the same as agree
- Try to mirror feelings rather then evaluate them
- Don't tell participants "that's OK" when it may not be
Give perspective if participant feelings are hurt. e.g.:
- I've seen this a dozen times and that happens nearly every time ... or
- I've made the same mistake ... or
- We all make mistakes and this is a good place to learn from them or ...
- Remind them of the Basic Assumption and say that we’ll work together
to figure out what happened ... or ...
B. Understanding
Remember to use Advocacy-Inquiry: be curious!
Exploring
Applying
Generalizing
1) Exploring
What were you thinking at the time?
It looked to me like …..
(Use this to discuss some error you observed and would like to find out why
the student chose a particular course of action)
How do you account for that?
Why did that happen?
What led to it? What next?
2) Applying
What drug or procedure or behavior might be best?
Have you ever done this clinically?
How might this be reflected in your clinical practice?
3) Generalizing
Have you ever seen anything similar to this in your practice?
Are there analogies to the clinical world?
What can be done in analogous situations?
Team Training: Unanticipated Difficult Airway 24
Appendix B: Debriefing Questions (cont.)
C. Summary
Review what was learned and ensure the single scenario is put into a larger
context.
1) Relate this experience to higher level principles, e.g., principles of
teamwork, circulation and respiration, patient safety, etc.
2) What did you do well?
3) What would you do differently?
Specific clinical management topics (i.e. issues from checklist which were
missed):
Additional topics:
1. What would your further management of the patient have been? i.e. talk to
family, ICU care, extubation, etc.
Anesthesia Skills
Case Hand-Over
Intra-operative Communication
Spinal Simulator
LP simulator set up with water
Spinal needles: 22G, 24G, 25G, 27G
Introducer needle
Regional tray (unopened)
Chlorhexidine solution
Gloves
Drugs
Bupivacaine
(2cc 0.75% with dextrose, 20cc 0.5% plain, 20cc 0.25% plain)
Lidocaine (30cc 1% plain, 5cc 2% plain)
Setup the spinal simulator in the room with SimMan
Anesthesia Machine
SimMan in hospital gown, on OR bed (head on ‘donut’)
Voice
IV pole
IV line in situ
Monitoring: NIBP, EKG, Oxygen saturation probe
Gas analysis: End tidal CO2 monitoring
Propofol syringe pump
Full oxygen cylinder on machine
Ambu bag-mask system
Gloves
O2 Mask
Suction
Temperature probe
Emergency drugs
Antibiotics
ECG dots
Routine OR monitors
Surgery
Drapes
Tourniquet
Drugs
Anesthesia cart fully supplied
Propofol (10 mg/ml) 20 ml syringe X 2
Fentanyl (50 mcg/ml) 5ml syringe X 3
Midazolam (1 mg/ml) 2 ml syringe X 1
Etomidate (2mg/ml) 10 ml syringe X 2
Ketamine (10mg/ml) 20ml syringe X 1
Succinylcholine (20mg/ml) 10ml in 20ml syringe X 2
Rocuronium (10mg/ml) 5ml syringe X 2
Kefzol (1 gm/250 ml) syringe X 1
Ephedrine (5mg/ml) 5ml in 10ml syringe X 1
Phenylephrine (200mcg/ml) 10 ml syringe
Atropine (0.4mg/ml) 2.5ml in a 5 ml syringe
Vasopressin / Epinephrine
Amiodarone / Lidocaine
Adenosine – 5 ml syringes (2 mg/ml) X 2
Ambubag
Gloves
Sedation
_____100% O2*
_____Call for help*
_____Brief description of problem
_____Attempt bag mask ventilation* – one person
_____Attempt bag mask ventilation – two person
_____Use oral / nasal airway
_____Attempt LMA
_____Attempt intubation not more than 2 X
_____Do not repeat failed technique* – change something ie different blade,
optimize position
_____Call for difficult airway cart*
_____Proceed to surgical airway*
_____Review plan for end of case (i.e. to PACU or ICU, extubation)
_____Appropriate use of resources ie can surgeon perform surgical airway
_____100% O2*
_____Call for help*
_____Brief description of problem
_____Attempt bag mask ventilation* – one person
_____Attempt bag mask ventilation – two person
_____Use oral / nasal airway
_____Attempt LMA
_____Attempt intubation not more than 2 X
_____Do not repeat failed technique* – change something ie different blade,
Rating
Strongly Disagree / Strongly Agree 1-5
N/A: n/a
Team leader:
Team member:
1. Clear understanding of his/her role. 1 2 3 4 5 n/a
2. Verbalize observations/errors/critical info. 1 2 3 4 5 n/a
3. Ask for assistance if unable to complete
task/during task overload. 1 2 3 4 5 n/a
4. Good communication: closed loop
communication/parrot back, clarify instructions,
verbalize activities. 1 2 3 4 5 n/a
Group:
1. Everyone involved in crises. 1 2 3 4 5 n/a
2. Avoid fixation errors. 1 2 3 4 5 n/a
3. Resolves conflicts/disagreements. 1 2 3 4 5 n/a
4. Roles are shifted to address urgent or
emergent events, when appropriate. 1 2 3 4 5 n/a
Rating:
Strongly disagree strongly agree 1-5
NA 0
Simulation Evaluation
Content Evaluation
1) The content was:
a) Current 1 2 3 4 5 n/a
b) Best practice 1 2 3 4 5 n/a
c) Free of bias 1 2 3 4 5 n/a
d) Relevant to my practice 1 2 3 4 5 n/a
2) I will change my practice based on the
i) information presented 1 2 3 4 5 n/a
3) The educational level of this activity
i) was appropriate 1 2 3 4 5 n/a
4) The most important concept learned during this session that may
contribute to a change in patient care is:
_____________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________
Instructor Evaluation
6. Malec JF, Torsher LC, Dunn WF, Wiegmann DA, Arnold JJ, Brown DA, Phatak
V: The Mayo High Performance Teamwork Scale: Reliability and Validity for
Evaluating Key Crew Resource Management Skills. Simulation in Healthcare:
The Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare. 2(1):4-10, Spring 2007.