Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 30 views

    Hre 125 Title Proposal

    Uploaded by

    Christian Joseph Cantilado
    The document is a grading rubric for a group performance task on proposing a research title. It provides evaluation criteria for the group's research presentation, supporting material, and individual members' content delivery. The rubric assesses proposals on a scale of excellent, good, satisfactory, or fair for organization, information validity, analysis support, and other factors. Individual student speakers are evaluated separately on their content appropriateness and delivery clarity.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Hre 125 Title Proposal

    Uploaded by

    Christian Joseph Cantilado
    30 views1 page
    The document is a grading rubric for a group performance task on proposing a research title. It provides evaluation criteria for the group's research presentation, supporting material, and individual members' content delivery. The rubric assesses proposals on a scale of excellent, good, satisfactory, or fair for organization, information validity, analysis support, and other factors. Individual student speakers are evaluated separately on their content appropriateness and delivery clarity.

    Original Title

    HRE-125-TITLE-PROPOSAL.docx

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The document is a grading rubric for a group performance task on proposing a research title. It provides evaluation criteria for the group's research presentation, supporting material, and individual members' content delivery. The rubric assesses proposals on a scale of excellent, good, satisfactory, or fair for organization, information validity, analysis support, and other factors. Individual student speakers are evaluated separately on their content appropriateness and delivery clarity.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    30 views1 page

    Hre 125 Title Proposal

    Uploaded by

    Christian Joseph Cantilado
    The document is a grading rubric for a group performance task on proposing a research title. It provides evaluation criteria for the group's research presentation, supporting material, and individual members' content delivery. The rubric assesses proposals on a scale of excellent, good, satisfactory, or fair for organization, information validity, analysis support, and other factors. Individual student speakers are evaluated separately on their content appropriateness and delivery clarity.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 1

    HRE 125 – PRACTICAL RESEARCH 2

    Performance Task 1 – Title Proposal

    Date: _____________

    Research Title: ______________________________________________________________________________________________

    Group Grade: ______________


    Group Evaluation Criteria Excellent Good Satisfactory Fair
    5 4 3 2
    The proposal is well-focused. The proposal is focused and The organization may be The topic’s focus is too
    It previews the topics, present explains how the presenters understandable to the narrow or too general. The
    the study in an interesting introduce and present the audience, but the proposal proposal shows some
    Research Presentation
    way, and shows how it will be study in a comprehensible could be more focused and organization, but it may not
    conducted. way. better organized. provide enough guidance
    for the audience.
    All relevant information was Sufficient information was Insufficient information was Not valid and reliable
    obtained and information obtained and most sources obtained and/or sources lack information were collected
    sources were valid. Analysis were valid. Analysis and design validity. Analysis and design and presented.
    Supporting Material
    and design considerations considerations were mostly considerations were not
    were well supported by the supported by the information. supported by the information
    information. collected
    Individual Evaluation Excellent Good Satisfactory Fair
    Criteria 5 4 3 2
    The speaker provides a variety The speaker focuses primarily The speaker includes some The speaker says practically
    of types of content on relevant content. The irrelevant content. The nothing. The speaker
    appropriate for the task, such speaker sticks to the topic. The speaker wanders off the topic. focuses primarily on
    as generalizations, details, speaker adapts the content in The speaker uses words and irrelevant content. The
    Content examples and various forms a general way to the listener concepts which are speaker appears to ignore
    of evidence. The speaker and the situation. inappropriate for the the listener and the
    adapts the content in a knowledge and experiences of situation.
    specific way to the listener the listener (e.g., slang,
    and situation. jargon, technical language).
    The speaker delivers the The volume is not too low or The volume is too low or too The volume is so low and
    message in a confident, too loud and the rate is not loud and the rate is too fast or the rate is so fast that you
    poised, enthusiastic fashion. too fast or too slow. The too slow. The pronunciation cannot understand most of
    The volume and rate varies to pronunciation and enunciation and enunciation are unclear. the message. The
    add emphasis and interest. are clear. The speaker exhibits The speaker exhibits many pronunciation and
    Pronunciation and few disfluencies, such as "ahs," disfluencies, such as "ahs," enunciation are very
    Delivery
    enunciation are very clear. "uhms," or "you knows. "uhms," or "you knows." The unclear. The speaker
    The speaker exhibits very few listener is distracted by appears uninterested.
    disfluencies, such as "ahs," problems in the delivery of
    "uhms," or "you knows." the message and has difficulty
    understanding the words in
    the message.

    Individual Grade
    Name Group Grade Total
    Content Delivery
    1.
    2.
    3.
    4.
    5.
    6.
    7.

    Evaluated by:

    Mr. John Cristian A. Ramos


    Date: ________________

    You might also like