Kong
Kong
Kong
IM-2/11-AP
Introduction: Treatments of Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Cells (CRPC) typically
consist of targeting androgen receptors. This is called Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and
it is mainly for advanced Prostate Cancer. ADT is designed to disrupt the androgen receptor
(AR)
pathway such as the full-length androgen receptor’s (AR-FL), complete with an intact ligand-
binding domain (LBD). Prostate tumors that progress despite first-line ADT (e.g., LHRH
number of clinically effective endocrine therapies targeting AR-LBD were recently developed to
treat patients with CRPCs (E.g abiraterone, MDV3100). Despite these treatments, the majority of
patients experience reactivated androgen receptor signaling. It was recently identified that
Androgen receptor splice variants that lack the functional LBD (AR-Vs) were responsible for the
persisting condition conveying adaptivity of CRPC (E.g. AR-V7, ARV567ES). AR-Vs originate
from androgen receptor transcripts with insertions of cryptic exons downstream of the coding
sequences for androgen receptor DNA-binding domain or due to the absence of exons coding for
cells require the use of specific inhibitory compounds that target other factors besides the
androgen receptors. Triptolide, a compound found in the Chinese medicinal plant, Thunder God
Vine, can be used to inhibit specifically the transcription aspect of Castration-Resistant Prostate
Cancer Cells.
Eric Kong
IM-2/11-AP
Background: Triptolide, a compound found in the Thunder God Vine, a Chinese medicinal
plant, has been shown to have possible anticancer and immunosuppressive activities. It is an
of the general transcription factor TFIIH. Cys342 of XPB specifically was identified as the
residue that undergoes covalent modification by the epoxide group of triptolide. Mutation of
Cys342 of XPB to threonine, an amino acid that is used in the biosynthesis of proteins, conferred
resistance to triptolide on the mutant protein. Replacement of the endogenous wild-type XPB
with the Cys342Thr mutant in a cell line (HEK293T) rendered it completely resistant to
triptolide, thus validating XPB as the physiologically relevant target of triptolide. Together, these
results deepen the understanding of the interaction between triptolide and XPB and have
implications for the future development of new analogues of triptolide as leads for anticancer and
immunosuppressive drugs.
Control 1
: Triptolide, a compound found in the Thunder God Vine, a Chinese medicinal plant,
of the general transcription factor TFIIH. Cys342 of XPB specifically was identified as the
residue that undergoes covalent modification by the epoxide group of triptolide. Mutation of
Cys342 of XPB to threonine, an amino acid that is used in the biosynthesis of proteins, conferred
resistance to triptolide on the mutant protein. Replacement of the endogenous wild-type XPB
with the Cys342Thr mutant in a cell line (HEK293T) rendered it completely resistant to
triptolide, thus validating XPB as the physiologically relevant target of triptolide. Together, these
results deepen the understanding of the interaction between triptolide and XPB and have
Eric Kong
IM-2/11-AP
implications for the future development of new analogues of triptolide as leads for anticancer and
transcription factors and global inhibition of mRNA synthesis. By using a systematic top-down
approach with the inhibitory effect of triptolide on RNA synthesis as the starting point, it was
identified the Xeroderma Pigmentosum B (XPB)/ERCC3 subunit of TFIIH was the new
molecular target of triptolide. We showed that triptolide forms a covalent complex with XPB and
inhibits its DNA-dependent ATPase activity without affecting its DNA helicase activity. A
number of putative cellular targets of triptolide have been reported to date. Among them are the
calcium channel polycystin-2, the membrane protease ADAM10, the dCTP pyrophosphatase
(DCTPP
immunosuppressive drug leads. They include PG490-88 and WilGraf which help in treating graft
rejection after organ transplantation, LLDT8 is for treating rheumatoid arthritis and Minnelide
for treating cancer. Among these alternatives, Minnelide is currently undergoing Phase I clinical
trial for cancer. All of these analogues still contain the compound triptolide in clinical
development and maintain the intact core structure of triptolide. However, Triptolide is still a
very toxic substance and requires an effective delivery system that minimizes the toxic effect and
maintains low-risk.1), and the kinase-regulating protein TAB1. [The Researchers] assessed the
cellular activity as well as the ability of each of the four analogues to covalently bind to XPB by
significant loss in activity for inhibition of cell proliferation and the ATPase activity of TFIIH,
toxicity and low-water solubility that is typically engaged in the delivery process. However, a
conjugate has been formed that binds Triptolide to glucose. Prostate Cancer cells have a higher
metabolic rate of activity because they consistently grow and reproduce faster than typical cells.
transporters so by conjugating the Triptolide with glucose, it can increase the effectiveness and
absorption of glucose.
Despite its great promise as an anticancer drug lead, attempts to develop triptolide and its
synthetic derivatives over the past few decades have not succeeded. Several generations of
clinical candidates have failed except for Minnelide, the latest triptolide derivative that has
entered a phase I human clinical trial. The major obstacles for triptolide to becoming a clinically
useful drug include its general toxicity and lack of water solubility (Titov, D. V. 3).
Control 2: Triptolide is a very toxic substance by itself. Its clinical uses have been limited by its
toxicity and low-water solubility that is typically engaged in the delivery process. However, a
conjugate has been formed that binds Triptolide to glucose. Prostate Cancer cells have a higher
metabolic rate of activity because they consistently grow and reproduce faster than typical cells.
transporters so by conjugating the Triptolide with glucose, it can increase the effectiveness and
absorption of glucose.
Despite its great promise as an anticancer drug lead, attempts to develop triptolide and its
synthetic derivatives over the past few decades have not succeeded. Several generations of
clinical candidates have failed except for Minnelide, the latest triptolide derivative that has
Eric Kong
IM-2/11-AP
entered a phase I human clinical trial. The major obstacles for triptolide to becoming a clinically
useful drug include its general toxicity and lack of water solubility (Titov, D. V. 3). One strategy
to reduce the toxicity of triptolide is to deliver it selectively to tumor cells over their normal
counterparts. A unique characteristic of tumor cells is that they have a much higher demand for
glucose than normal cells partially owing to the Warburg effect. Consequently, most cancer cells
overexpress one or more isoforms of glucose transporters (GLUTs), particularly GLUT1 and
GLUT3, to sustain their growth and survival. The overexpression of GLUTs in tumor cells has
been exploited to target tumor cells selectively by conjugating cytotoxic drugs to glucose.
Glucose conjugates have been made for a number of cytotoxic drugs such as ifosfamide
and taxol and have been shown to have lower toxicity and higher tumor cell selectivity in vitro
(Talk about different delivery systems). We designed and synthesized five glutriptolide
derivatives, compounds 2–6 (Figure 1). We chose the C14 hydroxy group as the site of linkage to
glucose as it is the most reactive functional group in triptolide and can undergo facile chemical
modification. Whereas there are multiple sites in glucose that can be used to connect to
triptolide, the C1 hydroxy group in glucose has been successfully used to form active conjugates
Control 3
: To test Triptolide’s effect on different cells and particular genes, different cell lines
were created with the use of CRISPR method. Certain genes were knocked out (Cell KO) and
were created to isolate certain genes and analyze the effect of various concentrations of
Triptolide on the transcription aspect. Next, cells were cultured over a set amount of time with
the presence of the drug. To isolate the genes, an RNA extraction process was implemented.
Eric Kong
IM-2/11-AP
Once the RNA was extracted, RNA transcription was used to create a strand of DNA to be
analyzed. Celltiter glo was then implemented to analyze the luminescence given off the
Carbamoyl phosphate synthetase I (CPS1), a ligase enzyme located in the mitochondria involved
in the production of urea (RNA extraction, Reverse DNA transcription, luminescence, Cell