Osa Orthopaedics
Osa Orthopaedics
Osa Orthopaedics
Cranio-facial morphology
and obstructive sleep apnea:
the role of dento-facial
orthopedics
Julia COHEN-LÉVY, Philippe CONTENCIN,
Vincent COULOIGNER
ABSTRACT
Orthodontists, thanks to their keen appreciation of facial morphology and their
skills in making functional examinations, are ideally placed to detect breathing
problems in their patients that can require an ENT assessment, with special
attention paid to the evaluation of sleep patterns. After a site of obstruction,
resulting from a soft tissue anomaly and/or a narrowing of the airway passage
through bone, has been established, orthodontists may be called upon to
undertake corrective treatment sometimes in conjunction with a surgical
procedure.
KEYWORDS
Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome
Child
Craniofacial growth
Adeno-tonsillar hypertrophy
Oral appliance.
1 - INTRODUCTION
Various estimates ranging from dilating muscles of the pharynx, can
3.2% to 30% have been presented also play a role in causing OSAS or
of the extent of habitual snoring in the intensifying the effects of the mor-
child population and on the 0.7% to phological anomalies in some cases.
10.3% who suffer from obstructive These interrelationships between
sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS), as cranio-facial anatomy and OSAS have
defined by the recurrence of complete frequently been described in adults,
obstruction (apnea) or partial obstruc- but only recently have investigators
tion (hypopnea) of the upper airways taken a lively interest in its occurrence
during sleep1,14,19. in children, with some emphasis being
This pediatric form of OSAS, which placed on the role orthodontists can
can affect newborns as well as ado- play as members of the inter-disciplin-
lescents, has a patho-physiology that ary medical research teams studying
differs from the adult variety, and is this ailment.
particularly hard to detect11,27. While it Collaboration between specialties is
is true that only a polysomnograph not limited to research and diagnosis,
recording can indisputably establish but continues in the application of the
the diagnosis of sleep apnea, the therapeutic sequence with orthodon-
paucity of sleep laboratory services tic appliances like rapid palatal expan-
make this tool available to just a small sion and mandibular advancement
percentage of possible patients. In often being indicated in early treat-
addition, the symptoms of OSAS are ment procedures.
variable, not widely known, and de-
We illustrate this article, which re-
pend on the child’s stage of growth
views contributions published in pe-
and development. (the reader may
diatric OSAS literature on cranio-facial
want to refer to the article on ‘‘How
morphology, with clinical cases trea-
to detect OSAS’’ in this issue).
ted by a team of an ear, nose and
The primary cause of OSAS is an throat (ENT) surgeon, a physician
anatomical narrowing of the upper specializing in sleep disorders, and
airways affecting both the soft tissues an orthodontist. We then discuss the
and cranio-facial structures. Defects in current protocols for the treatment of
local neuro-muscular control, with OSAS, focusing on the participation of
accompanying loss of tone of the specialists in dento-facial orthopedics.
110 Cohen-Lévy J, Contencin P, Couloigner V. Cranio-facial morphology and obstructive sleep apnea
CRANIOFACIAL MORPHOLOGY AND OBSTRUCTIVE SLEEP APNEA: THE ROLE OF DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS
112 Cohen-Lévy J, Contencin P, Couloigner V. Cranio-facial morphology and obstructive sleep apnea
CRANIOFACIAL MORPHOLOGY AND OBSTRUCTIVE SLEEP APNEA: THE ROLE OF DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS
a and b: this 4 year-old boy, afflicted with achondroplasia, also had persistent OSAS symptoms despite previous
adeno-tonsillectomy. Visual examination showed facial retrusion, with caved-in nasal appearance, accentuated by
hydrocephaly;
c and d: intra-oral examination revealed a Class II malocclusion with uni-lateral cross bite associated with symmetrical
maxillary insufficiency with lateral deviation.
114 Cohen-Lévy J, Contencin P, Couloigner V. Cranio-facial morphology and obstructive sleep apnea
CRANIOFACIAL MORPHOLOGY AND OBSTRUCTIVE SLEEP APNEA: THE ROLE OF DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS
Familial predisposition to Class III protrusion and development of anterior cross bite after wearing a VPPC mask.
a and b: Karla 5 years old;
c and d: her mother.
and other sleep respiratory disorders changed after the nasal obstruction
can produce retardation or a break in was removed thus spontaneously re-
growth rates by interfering with nor- storing contact between upper and
mal nocturnal secretion of the soma- lower lips, allowing tongue position to
totropic hormone, the GH or growth rise, and restoring better head pos-
hormone. ture, all effects that have been repeat-
After surgery, a significant increase edly described since the first studies
in the serum levels of molecular GH on breathing were conducted. But a
mediators has been noted, the insulin- Swiss orthodontist has formulated an
like growth factor I (IGF I) and IGFBP-3 alternative hypothesis in evaluating
(binding protein), along with an in- these results23, asserting that the
crease in height and weight, some- schema of the posterior mandibular
times sufficient, in a "catch-up" effect, rotation in young OSAS patients re-
to restore the patient to normal body sults from a decrease in ramal growth,
growth. development of the condylar cartilage
having slowed down because of a
One team devoted itself to studying
decrease in serum GH, growth hor-
the repercussion of OSAS on cranio-
mone levels.
facial growth31, by comparing over a
five year period the morphology of a
group of children with sleep apnea, 3 - 3 - Rapid palatal expansion
treated with tonsillectomy and adenoi-
dectomy, to a control group of children The work of Linder-Aronson and
with no breathing problems. Before Woodside, cited by Villa30, described
treatment, at an average age of 5.5 the effects of rapid palatal expansion
years, they found significant differ- on breathing even before the identifi-
ences between the apnea patients cation of obstructive sleep apnea in
and the control group, as revealed by children. This orthopedic treatment
cephalometric analyses. The apnea produced a significant increase in the
patients had mandibles that were area of the nasal fossas and a 36.2 to
more inclined posteriorly and maxillae 45% reduction in nasal resistance.
that were more tilted anteriorly. They The creation of additional space for
had an increase in anterior facial the tongue helped, secondarily, to
height, the anterior portions of their open up the oropharynx. In his study-
cranial bases were shorter, their upper Villa30 proposed to evaluate rapid
and lower incisors tilted more lin- maxillary expansion in the treatment
gually, and nasal areas that did not of OSAS, using a sample of children 4
jut as far forward. But five years after to 11 years old, selected in accor-
treatment, the authors found no sig- dance with three criteria:
nificant differences between the two – the existence of a malocclusion,
groups except for length of the cranial with a deep and narrow vaulted palate
base and of the nose both of which associated with overbite in a Class II
remained shorter for the apnea pa- relationship or anterior cross bite;
tients than for the control group. – OSAS symptoms, with habitual
A possible explanation for these snoring and pauses in respiration,
results is that muscular equilibrium sleep that is not restorative, an
116 Cohen-Lévy J, Contencin P, Couloigner V. Cranio-facial morphology and obstructive sleep apnea
CRANIOFACIAL MORPHOLOGY AND OBSTRUCTIVE SLEEP APNEA: THE ROLE OF DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS
apnea-hypopnea per hour (AHI) > 1 orthopedics had played alongside ENT
per hour, as measured by poly-somno- surgery Guilleminault et al ) reviewed
graphy; the records of 32 patients, from 4 to 9
– refusal of parents to have tonsil- year old, who needed removal of
lectomy and adenoidectomy per- excess tonsilar and adenoidal tissue
formed on their child. as well as orthodontic treatment and
presented a moderate OSAS condi-
The investigators excluded from
tion, as defined by their having a
their list subjects who were obese,
minimal oxygen saturation level of
had cardio-respiratory or neuro-mus-
90%, and an IAH of less than 20 per
cular problems, had severe cranio-
hour. The children were divided into
facial anomalies, or presented severe
two groups, the first receiving surgical
symptoms. The rapid expander was
treatment before the rapid palatal
soldered to two bands that were
expansion and the other the same
cemented to the maxillary second
therapies in reverse order. The results,
temporary molars and was activated
evaluated by questionnaire and with
by two turns for the first 10 days until
polysomnographic readings taken at
the palatal cusps of the upper molars
the time of diagnosis and between
were in contact with the buccal cusps
three and six months after each
of their mandibular antagonists.
therapeutic procedure had been com-
The extent of expansion achieved pleted, showed that 87.5% of the
was an average of 3.7 + mm in the patients required both types of treat-
canine region and 5.0 + 2.2 mm in the ment. Surgery alone did not correct
molar region. In a 12 month fixed the OSAS completely and in only two
retention period the over-correction patients did the OSAS symptoms
was maintained. The AHI decreased disappear after only orthodontic treat-
significantly after treatment, dropping ment. For two patients the apnea
from 5.8 ± 6.8 to 1.5 ± 1.6 (p = 0.005), condition continued unabated despite
together with an improvement in the their having received both therapies.
index of oxygen saturation and the
In this study, in which some pa-
index of arousal from sleep. It should
tients also received mandibular expan-
be noted that the change in AHI
sion, the maxillary expansion was
differed as a function of the type of
accomplished with the opening of
malocclusion, being greater with chil-
the orthopedic device a quarter of a
dren with Class II overjet and overbite
millimeter per day. Both fixed and
than with children who had cross
removable appliances were used de-
bites. For two patients (14,3%), the
pending on the clinical situation and
rapid palatal expansion had no effect
the preference of the orthodontist.
on AHI, the authors attributing this to
major anatomical blockages, a nasal
septum deviation in one child and 3 - 4 - Mandibular advancement
marked hypertrophy of palatal soft
tissue that was repeatedly re-infected
oral devices30
in the other. Mandibular advancement appli-
In order to evaluate the contribution ances, designed like orthopedic
to the treatment result maxillo-facial activators, free up the pharynx and
4 - CONCLUSION
While orthodontists have made But according to some studies of
evaluation of lip and tongue habits a the morphology of patients with ob-
regular component of the intake ex- structive respiratory difficulties, it
aminations they conduct on potential would appear that when orthodontists
patients, they have not yet routinely assess Class II malocclusions or un-
incorporated an assessment of the derdevelopment or hyper-divergence
quality of sleep and the presence or of upper or lower jaws, it is important
absence of snoring into their pre- that they determine whether or not
treatment record taking. some aspect of obstructive sleep
118 Cohen-Lévy J, Contencin P, Couloigner V. Cranio-facial morphology and obstructive sleep apnea
CRANIOFACIAL MORPHOLOGY AND OBSTRUCTIVE SLEEP APNEA: THE ROLE OF DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS
REFERENCES
1. Agence nationale d’accréditation et d’évaluation en santé. Évaluation clinique et
économique de la chirurgie dans le traitement du syndrome des apnées obstructives
du sommeil. Paris: Anaes; 1999.
2. American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP). Subcommittee on Obstructive Sleep Apnea
Syndrome. Clinical practice guideline: diagnosis and management of childhood
obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. Pediatrics 2002;109(4):704-12.
3. Bonuck KA, Freeman K, Henderson J. Growth and growth biomarker changes after
adenotonsillectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Dis Child. 2009
Feb;94(2):83-91.
4. Buchenau W, Urschitz MS, Sautermeister J, Bacher M, Herberts T, Arand J, Poets CF.
A randomized clinical trial of a new orthodontic appliance to improve upper airway
obstruction in infants with Pierre Robin sequence. J Pediatr. 2007 Aug;151(2):145-9.
5. Carvalho FR, Lentini-Oliveira D, Machado MA, Prado GF, Prado LB, Saconato H. Oral
appliances and functional orthopaedic appliances for obstructive sleep apnoea in
children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Apr 18;(2):CD005520.
6. De Miguel-Diez J, Villa-Asensi JR, Alvarez-Sala JL. Prevalence of sleep-disordered
breathing in children with Down syndrome: polygraphic findings in 108 children. Sleep.
2003 Dec 15;26(8): 1006-9.
7. Defabjanis P. Impact of nasal airway obstruction on dentofacial development and sleep
disturbances in children: preliminary notes. J Clin Ped Dent 2003;27(2):95-100.
8. Denny AD, Amm CA, Schaefer RB. Outcomes of tongue-lip adhesion for neonatal
respiratory distress caused by Pierre Robin sequence. J Craniofac Surg. 2004
Sep;15(5):819-23.
9. Donnelly LF, Shott SR, LaRose CR, Chini BA, Amin RS. Causes of persistent
obstructive sleep apnea despite previous tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy in children
with down syndrome as depicted on static and dynamic cine MRI. AJR Am J
Roentgenol. 2004 Jul;183(1):175-81. Links
10. Guilleminault C, Li KK, Khramstov A, Pelayo R, Martnez S. Sleep disordered breathing:
surgical outcomes in prepubertal children. Laryngoscope 2004;14(1):132-7.
11. Guilleminault C, Pelayo R, Leger D, Clerk A, Bocian RC. Recognition of sleep-
disordered breathing in children. Pediatrics 1996;98:871-882.
12. Guilleminault C, Quo S, Huynh NT, Li K. Orthodontic expansion treatment and
adenotonsillectomy in the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea in prepubertal
children. Sleep 2008;31(7):953-957.
13. Guilleminault C, PartinenM, Praud JP, Quera-SalvaMA, Powell N, Riley R. Morpho-
metric facial changes and obstructive sleep apnea in adolescents. J Pe-
diatr.1989;114(6):997-9.
14. Guilleminault C, Stoohs R. Chronic snoring and obstructive sleep apnea syndrome in
children. Lung 1990;168 Suppl:912-9.
15. Jamieson A, Guilleminault C, Partinen M, Quera-Salva MA. Obstructive sleep apneic
patients have craniomandibular abnormalities. Sleep 1986;9:469-77.
16. Kasey K. Li, Robert W. Riley, Guilleminault C. An Unreported Risk in the Use of Home
Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure and Home Nasal Ventilation in Children
Mid-Face Hypoplasia Chest 2000;117:916-918.
17. Kawashima S, Peltomäki T, Sakata H, Mori K, Happonen RP, Rönning O. Craniofacial
morphology in preschool children with sleep-related breathing disorder and hyper-
trophy of tonsils. Acta Paediatr. 2002;91(1):71-7.
18. Lim J, McKean M. Adenotonsillectomy for obstructive sleep apnoea in children.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;(1):CD003136.
19. Lumeng JC, Chervin DR. Epidemiology of pediatric obstructive sleep apnea. Proc Am
Thorac Soc 2008;5:242-252.
20. Marcus CL, Rosen G, Ward SL, Halbower AC, Sterni L, Lutz J, Stading PJ, Bolduc D,
Gordon N. Adherence to and effectiveness of positive airway pressure therapy in
children with obstructive sleep apnea. Pediatrics. 2006 Mar;117(3):e442-51.
21. Miyao E, Noda A, Miyao M, Yasuma F, Inafuku S. The role of malocclusion in non-
obese patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. Intern Med. 2008;47(18):1573-
8. Epub 2008 Sep 16
22. Onodera K, Niikuni N, Chigono T, Nakajima I, Sakata H, Motizuki H. Sleep disordered
breathing in children with achondroplasia. Part 2. Relationship with craniofacial and
airway morphology. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2006 Mar;70(3):453-61.
23. Peltomäki T. The effect of mode of breathing on craniofacial growth-revisited. Eur J
Orthod. 2007 Oct;29(5):426-9. Epub 2007 Sep 4.
24. Pijpers M, Poels PJ, Vaandrager JM, de Hoog M, van den Berg S, Hoeve HJ, Joosten
KF. Undiagnosed obstructive sleep apnea syndrome in children with syndromal
craniofacial synostosis. J Craniofac Surg. 2004 Jul;15(4):670-4. Links.
25. Pirilä-Parkkinen K, Pirttiniemi P, Nieminen P, Tolonen U, Pelttari U, Löppönen H. Dental
arch morphology in children with sleep-disordered breathing. Eur J Orthod. 2009
Apr;31(2):160-7.
26. Rees K, Wright A, Keeling JW, Douglas NJ. Facial structure in the sudden infant death
syndrome: case control study. Br Med J 1998;317:179-180.
27. Robinson P. D,Waters K. Are children just small adults? The differences between
paediatric and adult sleep medicine. Internal Medicine Journal (2008).
28. Shintani T, Asakura K, Kataura A. The effect of adenotonsillectomy in children with
OSA. Int J Ped Otorhinolaryngology 1998;44(1):51-8.
29. Villa MP, Bernkopf E, Pagani J, Broia V, Montesano M, Ronchetti R. Randomized
controlled study of an oral jaw-positioning appliance for the treatment of obstructive
sleep apnea in children with malocclusion. Am J Respir Crit Care Med Vol 165. pp 123-
127, 2002.
30. Villa MP, Malagola C, Pagani J, Montesano M, Rizzoli A, Guilleminault C, Ronchetti R.
Rapid maxillary expansion in children with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome: 12-
month follow-up q. Sleep Med. 2007 Mar;8(2):128-34.
31. Zettergren-Wijk L, Carl-Magnus Forsberg and Sten Linder-Aronson. Changes in
dentofacial morphology after adeno-/tonsillectomy in young children with obstructive
sleep apnoea – a 5-year follow-up study. Eur J Orthod 28 (2006) 319-326.
32. Zucconi M, Caprioglio A, Calori G, et. al. Craniofacial modifications in children with
habitual snoring and obstructive sleep apnoea: a case-control study. Eur Respir J
1999;13:411-417.
120 Cohen-Lévy J, Contencin P, Couloigner V. Cranio-facial morphology and obstructive sleep apnea