Filtro MAP de MTE

Product Model: Yaskawa 6-Pulse Drive Platform (A1000) with MTE Matrix-AP Filter Testing Results
Date: 10/3/2018
Prepared by: Rick Hombsch
Background
This test report outlines testing at MTE Corporation. The goal of this testing was to confirm the harmonic, power
factor and efficiency performance of a Yaskawa A1000 VFD with an MTE Matrix-AP Filter.
Testing Outline
1. General System Overview

Testing was done using a Yokogawa WT1800 6-Channel power quality analyzer with channels 1-3
measuring the system input voltage and currents and 4-6 measuring the system output voltage and
currents. An Agilent oscilloscope was used to take all waveforms.
Matrix-AP Part
System HP Drive Part No. Motors
No.
600HP MAPP0636D CIMR-AU4A0675AAA 2X 450HP
Unit was supplied power from a 480V breaker and its outputs were run to motor-dyne sets. Each dyne set
contains a drive motor that is driven by the drive system and a load motor driven from the line. The load
will be added by increasing the speed differential between the load motor and the drive motor. The
diagram below shows a basic outline of the setup.
Page 1 of 8
Figure 1 Diagram of Loading Scheme
Measurements recorded at varying loads from 30-96%. The below diagram displays the location of the
input and output measurements. Waveforms were recorded at 30, 50, 75 and 100% load.
Figure 2 Diagram of location of input/output measurements
Page 2 of 8
2. Test Measurements
The measurements recorded include the following:
a. Input Voltage
b. Input Current
c. Input Voltage Distortion
d. Input Current Distortion
e. Output Voltage
f. Output Current
g. Input Power Factor
h. Output Power Factor
Data Result Tables
Input Voltage Input Current
%Load Phase A Phase B Phase C Avg Phase A Phase B Phase C Avg

29% 479.97 479.88 479.38 479.74 179.74 180.37 179.37 179.83
40% 479.10 479.35 478.73 479.06 241.23 242.49 240.86 241.53
47% 478.98 479.32 478.68 478.99 280.01 280.02 279.21 279.75
55% 476.87 477.18 476.49 476.85 323.66 324.64 323.29 323.87
63% 478.99 479.19 478.84 479.01 375.67 375.96 374.93 375.52
67% 479.11 479.25 478.60 478.99 396.13 395.68 394.98 395.60
70% 477.98 478.12 477.63 477.91 418.13 417.84 417.28 417.75
79% 477.53 477.79 477.05 477.46 468.15 467.21 465.87 467.08
82% 476.40 476.80 476.19 476.46 490.65 489.24 488.91 489.60
90% 475.95 476.66 476.07 476.23 534.88 534.47 532.45 533.93
96% 475.80 476.43 475.63 475.95 574.53 573.47 571.66 573.22
Page 3 of 8
Input Voltage Distortion Input Current Distortion

29% 1.32 1.288 1.249 1.29 8.827 8.957 9.772 9.19
40% 1.338 1.309 1.277 1.31 7.055 7.08 7.699 7.28
47% 1.291 1.264 1.231 1.26 6.175 6.146 6.771 6.36
55% 0.857 0.803 0.903 0.85 5.076 4.873 5.095 5.01
63% 1.289 1.259 1.259 1.27 4.518 4.661 5.151 4.78
67% 1.247 1.242 1.229 1.24 4.287 4.426 4.827 4.51
70% 1.299 1.291 1.255 1.28 4.213 4.4 4.746 4.45
79% 1.365 1.34 1.295 1.33 3.976 4.081 4.502 4.19
82% 1.352 1.334 1.293 1.33 3.655 3.871 4.158 3.89
90% 1.325 1.316 1.252 1.30 3.425 3.608 3.863 3.63
96% 1.409 1.423 1.343 1.39 3.678 3.679 3.866 3.74
Output Voltage Output Current

29% 524.83 524.88 525.2 524.97 343.40 * 343.40 343.40
40% 520.28 519.86 520.5 520.21 386.80 * 387.50 387.15
47% 518.23 518.7 517.71 518.21 411.20 * 412.90 412.05
55% 515.37 514.29 514.73 514.80 443.90 * 446.70 445.30
63% 506.71 507.27 507.7 507.23 495.10 * 499.10 497.10
67% 505.73 504.53 505.7 505.32 513.50 * 517.40 515.45
70% 502.97 504.54 503.92 503.81 552.20 * 555.90 554.05
79% 500.51 502.06 501.66 501.41 570.90 * 575.80 573.35
82% 501.68 500.16 501.12 500.99 587.70 * 589.50 588.60
90% 497.04 497.46 495.65 496.72 629.10 * 634.30 631.70
96% 497.29 496.39 495.43 496.37 641.20 * 646.20 643.70
* Output current from Phase B did not record correctly
Page 4 of 8
Power Factor Measurements
% Load PF(Input) PF(Output) Q(Input)
29% 0.943 0.1801 -4.59E+04

40% 0.9872 0.3854 -2.83E+04
47% 0.9938 0.4621 -1.91E+04
55% 0.9961 0.5248 -7.05E+03
63% 0.9964 0.6461 1.54E+04
67% 0.9955 0.6735 2.35E+04
70% 0.9923 0.7325 4.08E+04
79% 0.9901 0.7461 4.79E+04
82% 0.9882 0.7481 5.32E+04
90% 0.9829 0.7971 7.35E+04
96% 0.9812 0.8025 7.83E+04
Input Current Harmonics at Varying Loads
5.0%
4.4%
4.2%
4.0%
3.0%
2.0%
1.0% 0.7%
0.3% 0.4%
0.0%
2 3 4 5 6 7
30% Load 50% Load 75% Load 100% Load
Page 5 of 8
Waveforms at 30% Load
Input
Voltage
Input
Current
Output
Voltage
Output
Current
Page 6 of 8
Page 7 of 8
DC Bus Voltage Waveform at 100% Load
Note: 100% Load was measured as worst case for DC Bus Ripple
Conclusions
The testing confirmed the performance of the system. The THID performance of the system at 30% load was
slightly higher than 8%. This is most likely due to the source impedance being below 1%. The oversized load may
also have played a role in this. At all other load points the THID was below 8% dropping below 5% at 55% load.
In addition, power factor was within normal ranges for this filter.
Page 8 of 8

Filtro MAP de MTE

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Filtro MAP de MTE

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Filtro MAP de MTE

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Product Model: Yaskawa 6-Pulse Drive Platform (A1000) with MTE Matrix-AP Filter Testing Results

1. General System Overview

600HP MAPP0636D CIMR-AU4A0675AAA 2X 450HP

Figure 2 Diagram of location of input/output measurements

Data Result Tables

Input Voltage Input Current

%Load Phase A Phase B Phase C Avg Phase A Phase B Phase C Avg

%Load Phase A Phase B Phase C Avg Phase A Phase B Phase C Avg

Output Voltage Output Current

%Load Phase A Phase B Phase C Avg Phase A Phase B Phase C Avg

* Output current from Phase B did not record correctly

% Load PF(Input) PF(Output) Q(Input)

29% 0.943 0.1801 -4.59E+04

Input Current Harmonics at Varying Loads

30% Load 50% Load 75% Load 100% Load

Waveforms at 50% Load

Waveforms at 100% Load

You might also like