ISSN 2249-4863

Journal of
Family Medicine
Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care • Volume 1 • Issue 2 • July-December 2012 • Pages 81-***

and Primary Care

www.jfmpc.com

Official Publication of the Academy of Family Physicians of India

Vol 1 / Issue 2 / July 2012
 Original Article

Birth Order and Psychopathology

Ajay Risal, Hema Tharoor1
Department of Psychiatry, Dhulikhel Hospital, Kathmandu University Hospital, Dhulikhel, Kavre, Nepal,
1
Schizophrenia Research Foundation, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India

A BSTRACT
Context: Ordinal position the child holds within the sibling ranking of a family is related to intellectual functioning, personality,
behavior, and development of psychopathology. Aim: To study the association between birth order and development of
psychopathology in patients attending psychiatry services in a teaching hospital. Settings and Design: Hospital-based cross-sectional
study. Materials and Methods: Retrospective file review of three groups of patients was carried out. Patient-related variables like age
of onset, birth order, family type, and family history of mental illness were compared with psychiatry diagnosis (ICD-10) generated.
Statistical Analysis: SPSS 13; descriptive statistics and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) were used. Results: Mean age of
onset of mental illness among the adult general psychiatry patients (group I, n = 527) was found to be 33.01 ± 15.073, while it was
11.68 ± 4.764 among the child cases (group II, n = 47) and 26.74 ± 7.529 among substance abuse cases (group III, n = 110). Among
group I patients, commonest diagnosis was depression followed by anxiety and somatoform disorders irrespective of birth order.
Dissociative disorders were most prevalent in the first born child (36.7%) among group II patients. Among group III patients, alcohol
dependence was maximum diagnosis in all birth orders. Conclusions: Depression and alcohol dependence was the commonest
diagnosis in adult group irrespective of birth order.

Keywords: Birth order, depression, psychopathology

Introduction age 15, significantly more girls, first borns, and children from
small families had DSM-III disorders, but the interactions
The possibility that the ordinal position a child holds within the between them were not significant.[20] However, few studies
sibling ranking of a family may predict intellectual functioning, have specifically examined the effect of birth order on young
personality, and behavior has been the subject of extensive adult mental health, and the results of most of the birth
research.[1-3] Alfred Adler proposed the effects of birth order order studies are contradictory and unsystematized.[14] In a
on human personality characteristics, which led to an increased comprehensive review of early studies investigating the effects
motivation of scientists toward birth order studies.[4] Different of birth order, it was considered that the principal difficulties
modalities of personality and human behaviors became the inherent in the majority of studies were the lack of adequate
focus of research which included intelligence, achievements, theoretical bases and derived explicit hypotheses.[8,9] Theoretical
mental ability, sexual orientation, etc. This debate on birth explanations may arise from biological factors unidentified here
order characteristics later involved psychiatric illnesses such and/or psychological stressors linked with these positions. The
as obsessive–compulsive disorder,[5] schizophrenia,[6-11] gender influence of siblings on the socialization of the individual has
identity disorder, and somatization disorder.[12] Studies have been recognized as a fact by both psychology and sociology.[1]
investigated the associations between birth order and various However, the significance of sibling order for the outbreak of
forms of psychopathology, including depression,[13] alcohol psychiatric diseases is still discussed controversially. A recent
abuse,[14] autism spectrum disorder,[15,16] anorexia nervosa,[17] study pointed toward the possibility that later birth order results
delinquency,[18] and the negative effects on well-being.[19] But in a more severe form of schizophrenia.[21]
such association remains unclear due to lack of consideration
of the confounding effects of family size.[3] In adolescence, at Considering all the above-mentioned facts and figures, this study
has been taken up with an aim to study the possible association
Access this article online of birth order and development of psychopathology among
Quick Response Code:
the patients attending the psychiatry services in a tertiary care
Website:
www.jfmpc.com hospital.
Address for correspondence: Dr. Ajay Risal,
DOI: Department of Psychiatry, Dhulikhel Hospital,
10.4103/2249-4863.104985 Kathmandu University Hospital, Dhulikhel, Kavre, Nepal.
E-mail: [email protected]

Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care 137 July 2012 : Volume 1 : Issue 2
 Risal and Tharoor: Birth order and psychopathology

Materials and Methods Effect of birth order on psychopathology

Analysis by using one-way ANOVA to evaluate the effect of birth
Subjects and assessment order in psychopathology did not show statistical significance.
Sample
The sample comprised 684 patients divided into three groups: Discussion
• Group I: Adult general psychiatry patients (n = 527)
• Group II: Child cases (n = 47) An attempt was made in this study to explore the possible
• Group III: Substance abuse cases (n = 110) association between birth order and psychopathology because of
contrasting findings generated by research in this field. The birth
All samples were collected by retrospective file review of patients order status, as an independent risk factor, has also been studied
admitted or evaluated in out-patient clinic of Department in schizophrenia population.[8] Ansari et al. (2008)[5] concluded that
of Psychiatry in Kasturba Hospital, Manipal, India, from birth order 1 was strongly correlated with obsessive–compulsive
1st January 2007 to 31st June 2007, after getting approval from disorder. The most striking finding in our study has been a
the Institutional Ethics Committee (IEC) of the hospital. uniform distribution of depression and alcohol dependence
diagnosis across all birth orders in group I and group III,
Procedure respectively [Table 2] with onset at fourth and third decades of
Detailed review of patient-related variables such as age of onset life respectively [Table 1]. In contrast, Putter (2003)[13] explored
of illness, order of birth, family type, family history of mental the effect of birth order in adolescent depression hypothesizing
illness, and psychiatry diagnosis (ICD-10) generated were studied that the first born would be more depressive as the parents tend
and compared. to be overprotective to the first born child, but results were
inconclusive. A study done by Granville-Grossman (1966)[6]
Statistical analysis showed that male (but not female) schizophrenics tend to be born
SPSS software package (Version 13, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) late in their sibships and it was concluded that there was a causal
was used to analyze the data. Descriptive statistics and one-way relationship between birth order and schizophrenia in males.
analysis of variance (ANOVA) were used to evaluate the effect In our study, both males and females, with birth order 4 and 6,
of birth order on psychopathology. respectively, had a higher prevalence of depression [Table 3].
A hospital-based study, in which 1034 schizophrenics admitted in
Results a mental hospital in India were analyzed for relation to birth order
and schizophrenia, revealed that in both the sexes, the early born
Age of onset of mental illness was affected to a significantly greater extent than the later born.[10]
The results are provided in Table 1. They suggested that in many Indian families, the early born has
to shoulder the stresses and strains of family responsibilities to
Distribution of birth order and diagnosis a large extent and this may be the contributing factor for the
illness. A similar finding could not be replicated because of the
Depression was the most common diagnosis among the group I descriptive nature of our study. Zahiroddin (2002)[11] concluded
patients, followed by anxiety disorder and somatoform disorder. that schizophrenia was more prevalent among the first born
Depression cases were most prevalent (60%) among the birth children. Similarly Gordazi et al. (2007)[7] showed that the first
order 6. Among the group II patients, dissociative disorders born children (male and female) were most likely to be affected
were present maximum (36.4%) in the first born child. Alcohol by schizophrenia and the first born male and the last born female
dependence was seen maximum in group III patients irrespective were at the highest risk. The sample of children in our study
of the birth order. consisted of all patients attending the child guidance clinic and
was not restricted to schizophrenic subjects as reported by these
Influence of genders and birth order in diagnosis authors and our results indicate that dissociative disorder was the
Depression was more prevalent among males of birth order most prevalent diagnosis [Table 2, group II]. We examined the
4 (53.3%) and females of birth order 6 (72.7%). Dissociative association of effect of birth order and psychopathology in the
disorder was more prevalent in the first order child (26.7%), three different groups using ANOVA [Table 4], but it was found
with twice the prevalence in females (57.1%). Among males, to be inconclusive. The large family size in our sample population
birth order 2 had the highest prevalence (70.6%) of alcohol (indicating joint family in most Indian societies) and nearly equal
dependence. distribution of diagnoses across the groups may have made it
difficult to predict the effect of birth order on psychopathology
Table 1: Age of onset of mental illness in the three groups statistically. Family structure-related factors such as birth order,
Groups Age of onset (Mean ± SD*) family size, parental age, and age differences to siblings have been
Group I (n = 527) 33.01±15.073 suggested as risk factors for schizophrenia,[8] but all these factors
Group II (n = 47) 11.68±4.764 were not examined in our study due to methodological limitations.
Group III (n = 110) 26.74±7.529 We did not use Greenwood–Yule reconstruction method for
*SD: Standard deviation making a correction for family size as done in an earlier study[3]

Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care 138 July 2012 : Volume 1 : Issue 2
 Risal and Tharoor: Birth order and psychopathology

Table 2: Distribution of diagnosis according to birth order

Birth order Group I (n = 527) Group II (n = 47) Group III (n = 110)
Diagnosis n (%) Diagnosis n (%) Diagnosis n (%)
1 Depression 33 (24.1) Dissociation 8 (36.4) Alcohol dependence 7 (88.9)
Anxiety 24 (17.5) Seizure 3 (13.6) Alcohol + comorbid mental illness 2 (11.1)
Somatoform 16 (11.7) Mental retardation 2 (9.1)
2 Depression 24 (27.6) SLD 1 (25) Alcohol 12 (66.7)
Psychosis 11 (12.6) MR 1 (25) Tobacco 2 (11.1)
Anxiety 9 (10.3) Psychosis 1 (25) Cannabis 2 (11.1)
OCD 1 (25)
3 Depression 18 (27.3) Mental retardation 1 (100) Alcohol 9 (60)
Anxiety 11 (16.7) Alcohol + tobacco dependence 6 (40)
Somatoform 11 (16.7)
4 Depression 14 (37.8) Mood disorder 1 (100) Alcohol + tobacco 4 (57.1)
Anxiety 5 (13.5) Alcohol 3 (42.9)
Somatoform 5 (13.5)
5 Depression 9 (39.1) - Alcohol 5 (62.5)
Anxiety 3 (13) Polysubstance use disorders 1 (12.5)
Somatoform 5 (21.7)
6 Depression 09 (60) - Alcohol + tobacco dependence 5 (100)
Anxiety 2 (13.3)
Somatoform 1 (6.7)
SLD: Specific learning disability; MR: Mental retardation; OCD: Obsessive–compulsive disorder

Table 3: Distribution of diagnosis and birth order between genders

Group Male (n = 402) Female (n = 282)
Birth order Diagnosis (%) Birth order Diagnosis (%)
I (n = 527) 4 Depression (53.3) 6 Depression (72.7)
F = 263 6+ Somatoform (33.3) 6+ Somatoform (22.2)
M = 264 1 Anxiety (23.9)
II (n = 47) 2 MR/OCD (50) 1 Dissociation (57.1)
F = 18 1 Dissociation (26.7) 2 Psychosis (50)
M = 29
III (n = 110) 2 Alcohol dependence (70.6) 2 Cannabis dependence (100)
F=1 6+ Comorbid mental illness (33.3)
M = 109
F: Female; M: Male; MR: Mental retardation; OCD: Obsessive–compulsive disorder

Table 4: Effect of birth order on psychopathology our practice settings. Considering the above-mentioned limiting
Groups Mean square df F Significance
factors, our future directions include analyzing the differential
effects of single child versus multiple children in nuclear families.
I 20.151 1 1.564 0.212
II 8.167 1 0.452 0.505
Additionally, researchers may like to examine the correlation of
III 17.547 1 1.509 0.222 birth order and diagnosis across generations in the families to be
studied. A prospective study and use reconstruction method to
make corrections for the effect of family size as explained above
analyzing familial data on psychiatric patients, which may be one may also be useful. In conclusion, our study has been explorative
of the limiting factors in our study aimed to assess the effect in nature and only looked at the distribution of diagnoses across
of birth order on psychopathology. Similarly, the retrospective birth orders and did not find a definite association of birth order
method of data collection in our study may not be a suitable and psychopathology.
process to avoid sampling and respondent related biases. Our
endeavor of assessing birth order effects on development of
psychopathology despite so many methodological shortcomings References
will definitely throw some light on the effect of sibship on 1. Sulloway FJ. Sibling-order effects. International Encyclopedia
psychopathology, helping us to look upon family-related issues of the Social and Behavioral Sciences. Amsterdam: Elsevier
during psychosocial management of any psychiatric illnesses in Science Ltd; 2001. p. 14058-63. ISBN: 0-08-043076-7.

Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care 139 July 2012 : Volume 1 : Issue 2
 Risal and Tharoor: Birth order and psychopathology

2. Chakraborty A. Birth order and mental illness. Br J Soc symptoms in early Adolescence. Perspectives in
Psychiat 1969-70;3:231-6. Psychology 2003;Spring:9-18.
3. Gregory I. An analysis of familial data on psychiatric 14. Conley JJ. Family configuration as an etiological factor in
patients: Parental age, family size, birth order and ordinal alcoholism. J Abnorm Psychol 1980;89:670-3.
position. Br J Prev Soc Med 1958;12:42-59. 15. Tsai LY, Stewart MA. Etiological implication of maternal age
4. Adler A. The individual psychology of Alfred Adler. In: and birth order in infantile autism. J Autism Dev Disord
Ansbacher HL, Ansbacher RR, editors. New York: Harper 1983;13:57-65.
Torchbooks; 1956. 16. Turner T, Pihur V, Chakravarti A. Quantifying and modeling
5. Ansari MA, Rehman RU. Correlation of obsessive compulsive birth order effects in autism. PLoS One 2011;6:e26418.
disorder with birth order-one. J Liaquat Uni Med Health Sci 17. Gowers S, Kadambari SR, Crisp AH. Family structure and
2008;129-32. birth order of patients with anorexia nervosa. J Psychiatr
6. Granville-Grossman KL. Birth order and schizophrenia. Br Res 1985;19:247-51.
J Psychiatry 1966;112:1119-26. 18. Calhoun G, Conley S, Bolton JA. A comparison of delinquent
7. Godarzi AM, Kianpoor F. Analysis of relationship between and non- delinquent in ethnicity, ordinal position, and
Schizophrenia and birth order of children. J Appl Sci self-perception. J Clin Psychol 1984;40:323-8.
2007;7:3307-11. 19. Fullerton CS, Ursano RJ, Wetzler HP, Slusarcick A. Birth
8. Haukka JK, Suvisaari J, Lönnqvist J. Family structure and order, psychological well-being, and social supports in
risk factors for schizophrenia: Case-sibling study. BMC young adults. J Nerv Ment Dis 1989;177:556-9.
Psychiatry 2004;4:41. 20. Feehan M, Stanton W, McGee R, Silva PA. A longitudinal
9. Kemppainen L, Veijola J, Jokelainen J. Birth order and risk for study of birth order, help seeking and psychopathology.
schizophrenia: A 31-year follow- up of the northern Finland Br J Clin Psychol 1994;33:143-50.
1966 birth cohort. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2001;104:148-52. 21. Gaughran F, Blizard R, Mohan R, Zammit S, Owen M. Birth
10. Sundararaj N, Sridhara BS, Rao R. Order of birth and order and the severity of illness in schizophrenia. Psychiatry
schizophrenia. Br J Psychiatry 1966;112:1127-29. Res 2007;150;205-10.
11. Zahiroddin AR, Semnami Y. Birth order and schizophrenia.
Med J Iran Hosp 2002;4:31-3.
How to cite this article: Risal A, Tharoor H. Birth order and
12. Birtchnell J. Mental illness in sibships of two and three. Br
psychopathology. J Fam Med Primary Care 2012;1:137-40.
J Psychiatry 1971;119:481-7.
13. Putter P. The effects of Birth order on depressive Source of Support: Nil. Conflict of Interest: None declared.

Announcement
iPhone App
A free application to browse and search the journal’s content is now available for
iPhone/iPad. The application provides “Table of Contents” of the latest issues, which
are stored on the device for future offline browsing. Internet connection is required to
access the back issues and search facility. The application is Compatible with iPhone,
iPod touch, and iPad and Requires iOS 3.1 or later. The application can be downloaded
from http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/medknow-journals/id458064375?ls=1&mt=8. For
suggestions and comments do write back to us.

Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care 140 July 2012 : Volume 1 : Issue 2