Program 60-107-Internal Gear Set Profile Shift Coefficients With Zero Backlash
Program 60-107-Internal Gear Set Profile Shift Coefficients With Zero Backlash
Program 60-107-Internal Gear Set Profile Shift Coefficients With Zero Backlash
The model follows the European convention of gears in mesh without backlash to
establish the sum of the profile shift coefficients. (The profile shift coefficient is
usually designated as the X factor on European gear drawings.) To provide backlash
in the gear set the tooth thickness of one or both gears must be reduced from the
values given by the model (or the center distance must be reduced).
The AGMA load sharing ratio and the AGMA I-factor are calculated for use in contact
stress analysis using AGMA Standard 2001.
Data for AGMA Load Sharing Ratio and I Factor Extracted from AGMA Standard
2001-B88, Fundamental Rating Factors and Calculation Methods for Involute Spur
and Helical Gear Teeth with the permission of the publisher, American Gear
Manufacturers Association, 1500 King Street, Suite 201, Alexandria, VA 22314
The model will check for the following conditions and provide a warning if the
geometry is outside the limits:
1. The roll angle at the pinion start of active profile is less than 5 degrees.
2. The roll angle at the gear inside diameter is less than 5 degrees.
3. The width of the tooth top land is less than 0.25/NDP (.25*Normal Module)
and the normal diametral pitch is less than 20 (Normal Module is greater
than 1.27).
4. The width of the tooth top land is less than 0.275/NDP (.275*Normal Module)
and the normal diametral pitch is 20 or greater (Normal Module is 1.27 or
less).
5. The teeth are pointed.
6. The normal operating pressure angle is less than 10 degrees or greater than
30 degrees.
7. The total contact ratio is less than one.
NOTE: The model does not check for undercut on the pinion and the profile
contact ratio is based on contact down to the pinion start of active profile.
Undercut must be checked by other means. (See UTS Model 60-450)
8. The specific sliding ratio is greater than three.
NOTE: If the specific sliding ratio is greater than three the geometry of the
gear set should be checked. However, for gear sets running at higher speeds
a specific sliding ratio of three may be too high and noisy operation and
scoring may result.
1
UTS Integrated Gear Software
Examples
Example 1
Example 1 is a spur gear set with a 14 tooth pinion driving a 50 tooth gear. The
normal diametral pitch is 10 and the nominal pressure angle is 20 degrees. If this set
is made to “standard” proportions we would use the input data shown in Figures 1-1A
and 1-1B, and would have the output data in Report 1-1. Note that the profile shift
coefficient for both gears is zero.
Fig. 1-1A
Fig. 1-1B
2
60-107—Internal Gear Set Profile Shift Coefficients With Zero Backlash
Report 1-1
3
UTS Integrated Gear Software
4
60-107—Internal Gear Set Profile Shift Coefficients With Zero Backlash
5
UTS Integrated Gear Software
Profile 1.5420
Helical 0.0000
Total 1.5420
6
60-107—Internal Gear Set Profile Shift Coefficients With Zero Backlash
7
UTS Integrated Gear Software
Fig. 1-2
If it is not necessary to maintain a “standard” center distance we may wish to cut the
pinion on a “15 tooth” blank to eliminate the undercut and decrease the center
distance. Figures 1-3A and 1-3B show the additional data inputs; Report 1-2 is the
solution for these conditions.
Fig. 1-3A
8
60-107—Internal Gear Set Profile Shift Coefficients With Zero Backlash
Fig. 1-3B
Report 1-2
9
UTS Integrated Gear Software
10
60-107—Internal Gear Set Profile Shift Coefficients With Zero Backlash
11
UTS Integrated Gear Software
12
60-107—Internal Gear Set Profile Shift Coefficients With Zero Backlash
Profile 1.5702
Helical 0.0000
Total 1.5702
Lines of Contact Across Teeth
Note that the “CD modification coefficient” is NOT equal to the “Difference of shift
coefficients”. The operating center distance is 1.7419 mm.
13
UTS Integrated Gear Software
Note the increase in AGMA I-factor and the reduction in the specific sliding ratio at
the pinion SAP.
Figure 1-4 shows these gears in mesh. The plot was generated in UTS Gear Program
60-450.
Fig. 1-4
14
60-107—Internal Gear Set Profile Shift Coefficients With Zero Backlash
Example 2
Example 2 is a helical gear set with a 20 tooth pinion driving a 85 tooth internal gear.
The normal module is 4 mm, the nominal pressure angle is 20 degrees, the nominal
helix angle is 25 degrees and the face is 30 mm. We are required to run on a 140 mm
center distance, which is less than the “standard” center distance. Figures 2-1A and
2-1B are the data inputs and Report 2-1 is the solution for the given data. (We need
to solve this part of the model to obtain the “Difference of profile shift coefficients”.)
Fig. 2-1A
Fig. 2-1A
15
UTS Integrated Gear Software
Report 2-1
16
60-107—Internal Gear Set Profile Shift Coefficients With Zero Backlash
The required operating center distance of 140 mm is 3.439 mm less than “standard”.
Therefore the “Difference of shift coefficients” is -.79050. We will apply all of the
difference to the pinion as positive profile shift and leave the gear “standard”. Figure
2-2 shows the additional data input and Report 2-2 is the solution for the model with
this condition.
Fig. 2-2
17
UTS Integrated Gear Software
Report 2-2
18
60-107—Internal Gear Set Profile Shift Coefficients With Zero Backlash
19
UTS Integrated Gear Software
20
60-107—Internal Gear Set Profile Shift Coefficients With Zero Backlash
Profile 1.2398
Helical 1.0089
Total 2.2487
21
UTS Integrated Gear Software
Note that this gear set is “full recess action” with the pinion driving and all contact
takes place after the “pitch point” on the line of centers. (This contact geometry
would probably not be satisfactory with the gear driving.)
Figure 2-3 shows the shape of the teeth in mesh in the normal plane for these gears
generated with the same rack used in Example 1. The plot was generated in UTS
Gear Program 60-450.
22
60-107—Internal Gear Set Profile Shift Coefficients With Zero Backlash
Fig. 2-3
23