The document reports results from several experiments investigating the effect of age of acquisition (AoA) on various eye tracking and response time measures. It finds that AoA generally had no effect on fixation counts or fixation durations for modifiers or headers. However, AoA did impact suffix fixation duration (SFD) in some experiments and fixation count (FC) in others. AoA also significantly affected response times and accuracy in several experiments.
The document reports results from several experiments investigating the effect of age of acquisition (AoA) on various eye tracking and response time measures. It finds that AoA generally had no effect on fixation counts or fixation durations for modifiers or headers. However, AoA did impact suffix fixation duration (SFD) in some experiments and fixation count (FC) in others. AoA also significantly affected response times and accuracy in several experiments.
The document reports results from several experiments investigating the effect of age of acquisition (AoA) on various eye tracking and response time measures. It finds that AoA generally had no effect on fixation counts or fixation durations for modifiers or headers. However, AoA did impact suffix fixation duration (SFD) in some experiments and fixation count (FC) in others. AoA also significantly affected response times and accuracy in several experiments.
The document reports results from several experiments investigating the effect of age of acquisition (AoA) on various eye tracking and response time measures. It finds that AoA generally had no effect on fixation counts or fixation durations for modifiers or headers. However, AoA did impact suffix fixation duration (SFD) in some experiments and fixation count (FC) in others. AoA also significantly affected response times and accuracy in several experiments.
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1/ 2
ET – LD
Modifier fixation count – AoA no effect
Header fixation count – AoA no effect
Modifier FFD – AoA no effect
Header FFD – AoA no effect
Modifier SFD – AoA DID have an effect. It made other things more significant. Made concreteness not significant. OO, TT, TO all significant. PC approaching significance. Check out the plot. As AoA goes up, SFD goes down. Header SFD – AoA no effect.
Pupil stuff doesn’t factor into transparency or presentation. So I don’t care.
ET - Letter
Modifier FC – AoA no effect. PC effect based on presentation condition.
Header FC – AoA no effect
Modifier FFD – AoA no effect
Header FFD – AoA no effect
Modifier SFD – AoA no effect
Header SFD – AoA no effect
ET – SC
Modifier FC – AoA no effect
Header FC – AoA no effect
Modifier FFD – AoA no effect
Header FFD – AoA no effect
Modifier SFD – AoA DOES have an effect. Did not impact other factors Header SFD – AoA no effect
ET – WR
Modifier FC – AoA DOES have an effect.
Header FC – AoA no effect
Modifier FFD – AoA no effect
Header FFD – AoA no effect Modifier SFD – AoA no effect Header SFD – AoA no effect
RT – LD AoA had an effect and took away the impact of transparency . Unless I take out ofwl, sadly.
RT – LET AoA no effect.
RT – SC AoA is super effective. OO, PC, and TO words are all significantly different.
RT – WR AoA significant. PC words in the whole condition were significantly different, with TT approaching significance.
ACC – LD AoA significant
ACC – LET AoA no effect
ACC – SC AoA significant. Made other things more significant
