8 Samuel
8 Samuel
8 Samuel
394 - 399
E. P. SAMUEL, D. S. PATIL*
Department of Electronics, North Maharashtra University, Jalgaon [Maharashtra], India
Here, we modeled a novel equation to determine full width at half maxima (FWHM) of probability density in GaN/AlGaN
quantum well structures in order to investigate the effect of aluminum mole fraction and well width on the quantum
confinement. Solutions of the Schrodinger’s time independent equation have been obtained using Quantum Transmitting
Boundary Method (QTBM) and transfer matrix method (TMM) has been used to compute the energy and transmission
coefficients. The wave function and probability density have been obtained for single quantum well structure of GaN/AlGaN.
The results obtained through our probability density spreading model shows excellent agreement with the analytical results.
Our versatile approach explores the probability density spread in terms of FWHM with simultaneous variations in well widths
and Aluminum mole fraction x. Our model provides useful physical insight to optimize structural parameters for the better
quantum confinement in emerging GaN based quantum well laser diodes.
intensity, luminescence power and the electrical We considered the time independent effective mass
characteristics. It was observed that electron probability Schrödinger equation in the one-dimensional varying
density depends on the quantum well thickness and envelope approximation.
d 2 Ψ(x)
effective mass of the carriers of Gallium Nitride and
2m*
Aluminum Gallium Nitride. The variation in the spreading =− (E − V )Ψ(x) (1)
of electron in the quantum well structure is observed due dx2 h2
to the band offset of quantum well and the barrier region. At this juncture, Ψ(x) is the envelope function, E is
We present here a model to express probability the eigen energy and V is band offset between the barrier
density spreading in terms of FWHM. The electron energy region and quantum well, and m* is the effective mass.
has been determined through the transcendental equations M. V. Fischetti [13] has suggested that one can obtain
using an iterative method. We had used transfer matrix the wave function amplitude and reflection/transmission
method with appropriate boundary conditions and coefficients. Under both the effective mass and envelope
assuming the electron probability density approaches to function approximations, the alternating layers of
zero at the edges of quantum well laser diode. The analysis dissimilar semiconductors show more relevance for finite
of the probability density and the wave function of the quantum well model [14] as shown in Fig. 1.
electron were carried out for the different quantum well
thickness and Aluminum mole fraction. The results for the
probability density and the relative wave function
amplitudes are presented in this paper. E
We have investigated for the first time a novel
equation for the determination of spread of probability
density function in the form of FWHM as a function of
well width and Aluminum mole fraction x of barrier layer V
in single quantum well of GaN/AlxGa1-xN. The equation A cos (kwz) B exp(-kbz)
B exp(kbz)
developed allows simultaneous variation of either well
width or Aluminum mole fraction x to determine FWHM
of probability density exploring the spreading of the
probability density. This spreading is very useful to 0 −a a
promote the quantum confinement and penetration of 0
wave function in the barrier as a function of well width
and Aluminum mole fraction. The following section of the
paper explains the mathematical approach used for the
modeling and simulation of probability density spreading.
Fig. 1. Finite potential well.
The results obtained through our equation have been
verified and found to be in excellent agreement with
analytical results as speculated in section III of the paper.
Finally, section IV highlights the conclusion. The boundary conditions are imposed to the
Schrodinger equation and the general solutions for each
2. Mathematical approach layer have been obtained. The general solutions of the
Schrodinger’s equation using the boundary conditions are
In order to model the complete carrier transport and as follows:
capture process, one needs to examine the nature of the
confinement and quantum well regions as well as their
mutual coupling. The carriers in the quantum wells are ψ ( z ) = B exp( k b z ), z ≤ -a
confined in one dimension and have discrete energy bands. ψ ( z ) = A cos( k w z ), - a ≤ z ≤ a (2)
Here, the square of wave function is interpreted as the ψ ( z ) = B exp( − k b z ), a ≤ z
amplitude of probability density for realizing the presence
of electron particle in a confined region. The Schrödinger
equation describes the transportation of the carriers from These general solutions include the arbitrary
one state to the other state that leads to continuity and the constants, which are determined through the normalization
probability density arise due to the probability current and of the wave function under the specified boundary
imaginary part of the potential [11]. As the size of the conditions and perceptive that at the interface the
modern devices is approaching to quantum size, continuity is provided by the wave function [15]. The
treatments, the particle wave dualism must be applied. wave vectors kw and kb are given by the following
Therefore, the Schrödinger equation with a convenient equations and to be determined with a different approach
approximation must be used to model the semiconductor with E is the eigen energy of the particle and V is potential
quantum heterostructures. This is a delicate approximation depth.
since it does not include possibility of propagation outside
the structure. Therefore, appropriate boundary conditions 2mw* E 2 mb* (V − E )
must be applied to give the correct physical behavior [12]. kw = and kb =
(3)
h h
396 E. P. Samuel, D. S. Patil
* is electron effective mass in well Table 1. Physical parameters used for the analysis.
In equation (3) m
w
Barrier Region Well Region
*
region of GaN (0.2m0), m is the electron effective mass
b Material AlGaN GaN
of AlxGa1-xN. The following relation can obtain the 28.5 3
electron effective mass for barrier region material Layer Length 27 6
AlxGa1-xN with respect to mole fraction. (nanometer) 25.5 9
Aluminum Mole 25% -
me (x) = [0.3x + 0.2(1 − x)]m0 Fraction
Electron Effective 0.225 m0 0.2 m0
Mass
kw and kb are the wave vectors in a quantum well and Band Offset (V) 396 meV
barrier region respectively. These, wave vectors have been
used to determine energy through an iterative method by 3. Results and discussion
yielding first the transcendental equations using the
transfer matrix method. The transcendental equations for The energies of carrier are no longer continuous in the
the odd and the even parity are obtained respectively as confined regions of quantum wells and the discrete states
are appeared in nanomaterials. The energy and the wave
kw × tan kw a = kb function are found by solving stationary Schrodinger
(4) equation subject to the boundary conditions. Here, we had
kb × tan kw a = kw considered the device length of 60-nanometer, the 25% of
Aluminum mole fraction x has been considered, so that the
stark effect which emerges with an increase in Aluminum
Here, the wave vectors kw and kb of the well region mole fraction due to which the red shift occurs. The
and the barrier region respectively are functions of the analysis of the wave function for different quantum well
energy. Thus, energy E is the vital parameter and need to widths has been carried out. The confinement of wave
be determined with proper considerations. It was observed function in a well region depends strongly on the chosen
that the energy shows great variation with the physical potential depth due to the band offset developed between
parameters such as well width and barrier height. These the well and barrier region. The potential depth depends on
parameters are crucial in the study of tunneling current as x of the alloy AlxGa1-xN used for the barrier region. The
well and tunneling can be analyzed through transmission confinement energy for a finite quantum well was
coefficients. Hence, we had determined transmission observed to be lower as compared to the confinement
coefficients through the following expression given below. energy in an infinite quantum well. The wave function
tunnels into the barrier region due to finite potential
The procedure assumed that all charge carriers approaches
quantum well as it is demonstrated in Fig. 2. It reveals that
in double barrier quantum well structure. The transmission
the wave function has better confinement for the lower
coefficient shows dependence on energy, the well width well width than higher values of well widths. This has
and the band offset arise due to quantum well been attributed to variation in the energy, which affects on
heterostructure. The transmission coefficient for energy the wave vectors kw and kb of the well region and the
less than band offset is given as barrier region respectively. The effect is similar as we
observed for the quantum confined stark effect (QCSE)
[16] with spatial variance, where the QCSE occurs for the
1 (5) electric field. The variation of wave function shows peak
T = 2 value at the center of the quantum well due to the
⎛ k w 2 + k b 2
⎞
1 + ⎜⎜ ⎟
⎟ sinh 2
(2 k b a ) symmetric quantum well structure.
⎝ 2k w k b ⎠
2m * ( E − V )
kb = (6)
h
0.3
of 25%. The transmission coefficients for different well Well Width (nanometer)
b)
Fig. 5. Variation of energy with a) well width b) barrier
height.
398 E. P. Samuel, D. S. Patil
Full width at half maximum (FWHM) of probability through theoretical analytical approach and calculated
density has been investigated thoroughly to analyze the through our equation (7) have been illustrated in Fig. 6 and
behavior of the carrier in the quantum well structure. The Fig. 7. The variation of FWHM with mole fraction x for
simultaneous study of well width and the Aluminum mole varying values of well widths from 1 to 10 nanometer was
fraction through the wave function and probability density observed to be nonlinear. The spread was found to be
is complex. The analysis of these parameters can be greater for lower values of x due to less values of barrier
comfortably understood through the investigation of height and band offsets. The linear variation of FWHM
FWHM of probability density. The investigation of the with well widths for different values of x was observed
FWHM of probability density has been carried out in a due to variations in energy and wave vectors. The solid
very comprehensive manner. It is very clear from our line shows FWHM deduced through theoretical analysis
results that better confinement is obtained for the higher and dotted line shows results obtained using our proposed
mole fraction and lower well width. Particularly, for the equation (7). The results obtained through our equation
aluminum fraction having a value less than 6% the spread shows excellent agreement with theoretical results.
of probability density for all the well widths has been
observed to be very high revealing that the quantum
confinement for such low value of x is immensely poor.
We have developed a novel equation to determine spread
of probability density in terms of FWHM Ψ f as a
function of well width W and Aluminum mole fraction x
as
( x + 1.005)
Ψ f = W ( x 3 + 7.305 * x 2 − 4.69 * x + 1.55 + 0.205 * (1.05 + (0.0025 * )));
x2
(7)
Well width (nanometer)
4. Conclusion