Cyberbullying - Impacting Today - S Youth

St.
Catherine University
University of St. Thomas
Master of Social Work Clinical Research Papers School of Social Work
5-2016
Cyberbullying: Impacting Today’s Youth

Hillary Noll
St. Catherine University, [email protected]
Recommended Citation
Noll, Hillary. (2016). Cyberbullying: Impacting Today’s Youth. Retrieved from Sophia, the St. Catherine University repository
website: https://sophia.stkate.edu/msw_papers/647
This Clinical research paper is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Social Work at SOPHIA. It has been accepted for inclusion in
Master of Social Work Clinical Research Papers by an authorized administrator of SOPHIA. For more information, please contact [email protected].
Running Head: CYBERBULLYING: IMPACTING TODAY’S YOUTH
Cyberbullying: Impacting Today’s Youth
by
Hillary Noll, B.A.
MSW Clinical Research Paper
Presented to the Faculty of the

School of Social Work
St. Catherine University and the University of St. Thomas
St. Paul, Minnesota
in Partial fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of
Master of Social Work
Committee Members
Melissa Lundquist, Ph.D., LGSW (Chair)
Dana Knight, MSW, LICSW
Kathleen Hiniker, MSW, LICSW
The Clinical Research Project is a graduation requirement for MSW students at St. Catherine
University/University of St. Thomas School of Social Work in St. Paul, Minnesota and is
conducted within a nine-month time frame to demonstrate facility with basic social research
methods. Students must independently conceptualize a research problem, formulate a research design that is
approved by a research committee and the university Institutional Review Board, implement the project, and
publicly present the findings of the study. This project is neither a Master’s thesis nor a dissertation.
CYBERBULLYING: IMPACTING TODAY’S 1
Abstract
Cyberbullying is becoming a major concern surrounding the adolescent population because of
the increased use in the internet and social networking sites. Studies show that cyberbullying can
cause mental health concerns in adolescents who have been victimized, leaving them feeling
lonely, depressed, and rejected. The purpose of this study was to explore the experiences of high
school students who have been victimized by cyberbullying and to explore the relationship
between cyberbully victimization and suicide. An anonymous mixed methods study was utilized
and formatted with both quantitative and qualitative questions. The survey was distributed by
email to students enrolled in the Bachelors of Social Work program at the University of St.
Thomas and St. Catherine University and asked respondents specific questions in regards to their
personal experience being victimized by cyberbullying and the impacts it had on them. The
results were analyzed quantitatively using descriptive statistics and independent t-test and
analyzed qualitatively using a content analysis approach. Results indicated that high school
students who were victimized by cyberbullying experienced negative emotional impacts
including feeling sad, helpless and hopeless, frustrated, and low self-esteem. The results of this
study did not find a significant relationship between cyberbully victimization and suicide but did
find that respondents reported feeling suicidal in the open-ended responses. Results from this
study were consistent with pre-existing literature.

Acknowledgments
First and foremost, I would like to express my sincere gratitude to my advisor and chair,
Melissa Lundquist, Ph.D., LGSW for all of her guidance, patience, support and constant
encouragement throughout this process and even through all of the road bumps encountered
along the way. I would also like to thank my research committee members Dana Knight, MSW,
LICSW and Kathleen Hiniker, MSW, LICSW for the continued support and guidance. The
dedication from my committee members contributed greatly to the success of this project.
Without you three this would not have been possible.
I would like to thank my friends, family and boyfriend for their constant support and
patience over the last two years. They have encouraged me to do my best and have helped me
remain positive throughout.
I would like to give a sincere thank you to my grandparents, Jim and Sharon. They have
never given up on me, been constantly supportive, and have always told me I will succeed and
do great things in life. Without you two, none of this would have been possible.
Finally, I would like to acknowledge all of my other professors at the University of St.
Thomas and St. Catherine University, who have offered me a strong foundation of knowledge to
use in my research and in the field of social work.

Table of Contents
Abstract……………………………………………………………………………………………1
Acknowledgements…………………………………………………………………..……………2
Table of Contents………………………………………………………………………………….3
Introduction………………………………………………………………………………………..4
Literature Review………………………………………………………………………………….7
Conceptual Framework…………………………………………………………………………..14
Methods…………………………………………………………………………………………..15
Results……………………………………………………………………………………………20
Discussion………………………………………………………………………………………..33
Conclusion……………………………………………………………………………………….42
References………………………………………………………………………………………..43
Appendices……………………………………………………………………………………….47
Introduction
When the thought of bullying arises, many people think of physical altercations or face-to-
face harassment. Cyberbullying is a relatively new term that takes on a whole new form of
bullying. Cyberbullying is a form of bullying that occurs through electronic technology
including texting, email, messaging online, over social networking sites, or through any other
electronic device (US Department of Health and Human Services, n.d.). While cyberbullying
has been going on through text messages, emails, and chat rooms for quite some time, the
number of cases have begun to rise as the use of social networking sites by adolescents becomes
more prevalent (Sengupta & Chaudhuri, 2001). Studies have shown that 90% of adolescents
report using the Internet on a regular basis and about 70% report having at least one user profile
on a social networking site (Patton et al., 2014). The use of social networking sites, such as chat
rooms, Facebook, or Twitter, gives adolescents ample opportunity to be in contact with one
another. It has been reported that social media and social networking sites are a common way
for youth to perpetuate violent acts, including bullying and harassment against their peers
(Patton et al., 2014).
Cyberbullying is a huge problem nationwide and affects a large proportion of the adolescent
population. The National Crime Victimization Survey is a survey that is weighted to represent
the entire 9-12 grade student population that is enrolled in school. According to the data from
this survey, in 2011 it was estimated that 2.2 million students experienced cyberbullying (Meier,
n.d). This means that 9% of the student population has reported experiencing cyberbullying,
which is up from 6.2% in 2009 (Meier, n.d). It is predicted that this number will continue to
grow as the number of adolescents with smart phones and access to social media continues to
increase. Unfortunately not all adolescents who are victims of cyberbullying report it to an adult.
According to Bullying Statistics (n.d.) only 1 in 10 adolescents who have been victimized
by cyberbullying report to a parent or trusted adult when they have been cyberbullied.
Adolescents who are bystanders to cyberbullying on social media often don’t report what is
going on to an adult either. According to Lenhart et al., (2011), 88% of adolescents have
witnessed other people being mean or cruel to another person on social media sites.
Anyone can be a victim of cyberbullying. Statistics have shown that location, meaning
rural, urban or suburban, or school size do not increase or decrease the risk of bullying (Lenhart
et al., 2011). Cyberbullying affects all races and genders. Surveys have shown that there are
some gender differences between the prevalence of cyberbullying, but both genders are still at
risk (Lenhart et al., 2011; Meier, n.d.). Female adolescents have a 22.1% greater chance than
males to be a victim of cyberbullying (Meier, n.d.). Adolescents from all races have a chance to
be cyberbullied. Studies have not found significant differences between races and victims of
cyberbullying.
Cyberbullying, just like bullying face-to-face has many negative impacts. The US
Department of Health and Human Services found that kids who are cyberbullied are more likely
to use drugs and alcohol, skip school, receive poor grades, have lower self-esteem, and have
more health problems than those who have not been cyberbullied (US Department of Health and
Human Services, n.d). Teens who are victimized often hide these negative feelings from adults
because they feel embarrassed that they are being bullied. Victims of cyberbullying can feel
lonely and unsafe (Lenhart et al., 2011). While face-to-face bullying happens the majority of the
time at school, often in front of witnesses, cyberbullying happens while the victim is in their own
home, making a space that may have been safe for the victim suddenly unsafe (Lenhart et al.,
2011).
Cyberbullying has also been linked to suicide. Cyber victimization is strongly related to
depression and depression is strongly associated with suicide attempts (Bauman, Toomey &
Walker, 2013). According to Lenhart et al (2011), teens who are victimized have suicidal
thoughts more often than those who have not been a victim. A study that looked at peer
harassment, online and traditional bullying, and thoughts about suicide found that victims of
cyberbullying and traditional bullying scored higher on a scale of suicidal ideation than students
that were not victims of bullying of any kind (Palmeri, 2011). Because cyberbullying leads to
higher suicidal ideation in students it also leads to more suicide attempts by students.
Everyone has a right to human dignity. According to the Social work for social justice:
Ten principles, everyone has a right to feel safe and respected. When someone is cyberbullied,
this right is violated (School of Social Work, 2006). Teens who are victimized often don’t feel
safe in their home, school, or at extracurricular activities. According to the US Department of
Health and Human Services (n.d.), 160,000 students per day stay home from school because they
feel unsafe to go because of bullying. This raises a huge problem resulting in many students
having truancy issues and wanting to drop out of school.
The purpose of this paper was to explore the experiences of adolescents who have been
victimized by cyberbullying. This research paper summarizes what the literature has already
discovered about the experiences of cyberbullying for adolescents who have been victimized.
The method for obtaining information is described and the findings are presented using
descriptive statistics, independent t-test, and content analysis. Finally, an interpretation and
discussion of the findings and suggestions for future research is discussed.

Literature Review
Social Networking Sites
Social networking sites have become increasingly more popular among the adolescent
population. The term social networking sites encompasses a broad range of sites, so it is
important to have an operational definition. For the purpose of most research studies, a social
networking site (SNS) is defined as a web-based service that allows an individual to construct a
profile within the system that consists of content supplied by the user, by other users, and/or
provided by the system and contains a public list of users that they have control over with whom
they can make connections with, share data with, and/or interact with (Karklins & Dalton, 2012;
Dredge, Gleeson & de la Piedad Garcia, 2014). On a SNS, a user is able to meet new people
who may share similar interests, be in a similar location, or have similar demographics (Karklins
& Dalton, 2012). Popular SNS among teens include Myspace, Facebook, and Twitter, among
many others (Sengupta & Chaudhuri 2011).
While social networking sites are available for all ages, it is common for adolescents
under the age of 18 to utilize them. According to a study of 144 students, 73.61% of them said
they created a social networking site profile when they were under the age of 18 (Karklins &
Dalton, 2012). Both males and females are on SNS, but female teens are 63% more likely to
have a profile than a teenage male (Sengupta & Chaudhuri, 2011).
Social networking sites are appealing to adolescents because it helps give them a sense of
belonging. Being a part of a group on a SNS instills a sense of membership within the
adolescent (Reich, 2010). SNS such as Facebook and Myspace help adolescents explore their
identity through building and maintaining different connections to others (Reich, 2010).
Cyberbullying on the Internet
Cyberbullying is the act of bullying in cyberspace by spreading rumors, making threats,
posting embarrassing information or pictures, sending threatening messages, or any other means
of bullying and is defined as behavior that is intentional and harmful, inflicted through
technological mediums (Walrave & Heriman, 2011). Cyberbullying can occur through mobile
phones, email, chat rooms, web pages, instant messaging, and social networking sites.
There are multiple ways for teens who cyberbully to harass users on SNS. The most
common ways are: to post cruel messages or threats on the victim’s profile, send cruel private
messages to the victim, post cruel messages or threats on someone else’s profile about the
victim, or to upload nasty or embarrassing pictures of the victim on a SNS (Dredge, Gleeson &
de la Piedad Garcia, 2014). Cyberbullying on SNS is appealing because it can be done both
publicly and privately. Dredge, Gleeson and de la Piedad Garcia (2014) found that both ways
were used almost equally as frequent. Facebook users have the ability to post information
publicly and they also can use a messaging system where they can send information to people
privately.
Prevalence of cyberbullying. With the increase in Internet use over the years,
cyberbullying has become more common. In a survey of 935 teenagers ages 12-17, over 25%
reported experiencing some kind of cyberbullying (Sengupta & Chaudhuri, 2011). This study
also looked at those who have profiles on SNS and found that 40% had been cyberbullied in
some way, showing that more people had been harassed if they had an SNS profile (Sengupta &
Chaudhuri). Another study found that of the 799 participants, 69 (8.6%) were classified as
cyberbully victims (Schenk, 2011).

A study done by Schneider, O’Donnell, Stueve, and Coulter (2012) used data from a
reginal census of high school students to look at the prevalence of cyberbullying and school
bullying. This study found that of the 20,000 students in the census, 15.8% reported being
victimized by cyberbullying (Schneider, O’Donnell, Stueve, & Coulter, 2012).
When looking at the prevalence of cyberbullying, it is also important to take into account
how many times a victim has been cyberbullied. A study done by Li (2007) looked at the
prevalence rates of cyberbullying and how many times a victim was cyberbullied. This study
collected data from 264 seventh grade students from Canada and 197 seventh grade students
from China. Li (2007) found that 28.9% of the students reported being victimized by
cyberbullying and 17.8% reported cyberbullying others. Of the students who reported being
victimized by cyberbullying, 54.9% reported being harassed less than four times, 20.3% reported
being harassed between four and 10 times, and 21.1% reported being harassed 10 or more times
(Li, 2007). By viewing the prevalence of cyberbullying, it shows that cyberbullying is an issue.
But, when viewing the prevalence of cyberbullying and how many times victims have been
bullied it shows that cyberbullying is an even bigger issue.
Cyberbullying is a concerning issue because it can be done from a person’s home and is
often done anonymously. A study done by Dehue, Bolman, and Vollink (2008), found that of
the 1,211 students surveyed, 16% had bullied someone on cyberspace and 22% had been bullied
on cyberspace by someone at least once during the present school year. Of those who had been
bullied, 34.8% did not know the identity of the bullier, meaning the bullying was anonymous
(Dehue, Bolman, & Vollink, 2008). It was also found that 85.6% of the students who
cyberbullied engaged in bullying while at their house and majority of them (62.97%) were alone
while doing so (Dehue, Bolman & Vollink, 2008).

These studies show that there is a significant portion of adolescents who have been
victimized by cyberbullying at least once in their life, this proves that cyberbullying is a
prevalent problem among the adolescent population. With the increase in smartphones and
access to social networking sites it can be suggested that the number of adolescents victimized
by cyberbullying will continue to increase.
Teens Who Cyberbully
Studies have examined reasons why cyberbullies feel the need to bully others and
whether or not there are common characteristics between teens who cyberbully. Walrave and
Heriman (2011) found that the three most common motives behind cyberbullying, reported by
teens who cyberbully, are that it was revenge to the victim, that the victim deserved it, or just
because it was fun. Gender differences between teens who cyberbully is often controversial, but
it has been found that teens who cyberbully are more often males (Walrave & Heriman, 2011).
Adolescents who have reported recent problems at school, assaultive behaviors, or report
using illegal substances were more likely to cyberbully (Hinduja & Patchin, 2008). Another
study found that the teens who cyberbully are in need of social support, have unhappy feelings,
and are eager to use drugs (Sahin, 2012). Both male and female teens who cyberbully scored a
lower affective empathy score than victims of cyberbullying, teens who both cyberbullied and
were victims of cyberbullying, and those who were not involved in cyberbullying at all (Pettalia,
Levin & Dickinson, 2013). This suggests that teens who cyberbully often are not affected by the
emotions that others feel.
Cyberbully-victim. A Cyberbully-victim is someone who reports at least one incident
where they have been perpetrating cyberbully behavior and at least one incident where they were
a victim of cyberbullying (Pettalia, Levin & Dickinson, 2013). A study by Pettalia, Levin &
Dickinson (2013) found that 44.6% of the adolescents surveyed identified as being a teen who
has both bullied and been victimized. This is significantly higher than those who identified as
being a teen who has been victimized (17.3%) and those who identified as being a teen who
cyberbullies (5%) (Pettalia, Levin & Dickinson, 2013).
Bullies can turn into victims, and victims can turn into bullies. A teen who cyberbullies
is six times more likely to be victimized on a SNS after they have bullied (Walrave & Heriman,
2011). But, a teen who is a victim of cyberbullying is nine times more likely to engage in
cyberbullying after they have been bullied than those who have not been victimized (Walrave &
Heriman, 2011). It has been found that teens who are victimized often feel hostile and angry
after being bullied (Ybarra & Mitchell, 2007), which could be fueling their bullying behaviors.
Teens Who Are Victimized
Many studies have found that the amount of time an adolescent spends on the Internet
and the information they display affects their chances of being a victim of cyberbullying
(Sengupta & Chaudhuri, 2011; Walrave & Heriman, 2011; Ybarra & Mitchell, 2007).
Adolescents who use the Internet more frequently experienced cyberbullying more than those
who used the Internet less frequently (Walrave & Heriman, 2011; Ybarra & Mitchel, 2007). On
a SNS, adolescents are able to disclose personal information about themselves. Sengupta and
Chaudhuri (2011) found that disclosing private information, uploading a picture of oneself, or
disclosing information about the school they attend puts them at an increased risk for online
harassment.
Studies have shown that teens who have been victimized can have negative emotional
experiences (Bauman, Toomey & Walker, 2013; Dredge, Gleeson, & Garcia, 2014; Gimenez,
2015; Sahin, 2012; Schenk, 2011). A study done by Dredge, Gleeson, and Garcia (2014) found
that of the 25 adolescent victims interviewed, 100% of them reported a negative emotional
impact resulting from the cyberbullying. Gimenez et al, (2015) found that an adolescent who
had been victimized often felt sad and rejected afterwards. Adolescents who have been
victimized reported feelings of unhappiness and were lonelier than teens who cyberbullied
(Sahin, 2012). Along with that, those who have been victimized on SNS report depression more
frequently than those who have not been victimized (Bauman, Toomey, & Walker, 2013). A
study done by Schenk (2011) found that adolescents who have been victimized by cyberbullying
reported significantly elevated levels of depression, anxiety, phobic anxiety, and paranoia when
compared to the control participants, or those who have not been victimized.
There is a strong link between depression, suicidal ideation, and suicide attempts, but,
there is a lot of controversy over whether it is cyberbullying that predicts suicide or whether it is
the depression that results from cyberbullying that predicts it. Studies have found that because
there is a link between depression and suicide and a link between cyberbully victimization and
depression, that there is a link between cyberbully victimization and suicidal thoughts and
attempts (Bauman, Toomey & Walker, 2013; Litwiller & Brausch, 2013; Schenk, 2011).
Litwiller and Brausch (2013) found that cyberbullying actually predicted suicidal ideation,
suicide behavior, and suicide attempts in the victim. Another study which surveyed 799
adolescents found that 5.7% of the adolescents victimized by cyberbullying reported attempting
suicide versus 0.0% reported attempts from the control group (Schenk, 2011). Schenk also
found that 10.1% of respondents victimized by cyberbullying reported suicidal ideations versus
0.0% of control group participants (2011). This suggests that there is a direct link between
cyberbully victimization and suicidal ideation and attempts.

Gender Differences. The current literature looking at gender differences among
cyberbullies and adolescents who have been victimized by cyberbullying is not consistent. Some
studies report there being a significant gender difference, while others report no difference. In a
study done by Schenk (2011), there was no gender difference found among the 8.6% of
participants who reported being a cyberbully victim. This also supports the results found in a
study done by Hinduja and Patchin (2008) that there is no significant gender difference between
adolescents victimized by cyberbullying.
On the other hand, a study done by Sengupta and Chaudhuri (2011) found that female
teenagers that are on social networking sites are 250% more likely to be harassed online or
contacted by unwanted strangers compared to males. A study done by Li (2007) found that of
the 133 seventh grade students that reported being victimized by cyberbullying, 31.2% were
male and 26.3% were female. This study also found that of the 82 participants that said they
have cyberbullied someone, 21.9% of them were males and 13.4% were female. Other studies
have found that there is no gender difference between cyberbully perpetrators, but found that
female victims are significantly more likely to be victimized by cyberbullying than males
(Dehue, Bolman, & Vollink, 2008; Walrave & Heriman, 2011).
Current research examines the various impacts adolescents who have been victimized by
cyberbullying experience. There is a current gap in the literature looking to see if there are any
gender differences between the impacts adolescents who have been victimized by cyberbullying
experience. A qualitative study done by Dredge, Gleeson, and Garcia (2014) interviewed
adolescents who have been victimized by cyberbullying. While this study found good
information regarding the experiences of these adolescent victims, the data was not compared
between genders. This is consistent with a study done by Pettalia, Levin, and Dickinson (2013).
In this study they looked at the various impacts of cyberbullying but did not compare these
impacts between genders (Pettalia, Levin & Dickinson, 2013).
Where the literature is lacking is looking at how being a teen who has been victimized by
cyberbullying effects other parts of their life. The current literature reviews how being
victimized can have negative effects on an adolescent emotionally, but does not look at the other
factors in their life, like school for example. Because cyberbullying has such major implications,
it can be assumed that an adolescent’s experience goes beyond emotional effects. Current
literature is also not consistent on whether or not there is a significant gender difference between
adolescents who have been victimized by cyberbullying as well as the impact cyberbullying has
on the victim. Considering this, it is worth a further study to investigate the experiences of
adolescents who have been victimized.
The research question being proposed are: What are the experiences of high school
students who have been victims of cyberbullying on social networking sites?
Conceptual Framework
The ecological framework is the idea that a person’s development is affected by
everything in their changing environment throughout their lifespan (Bronfenbrenner, 1977).
Bronfenbrenner found that there are four levels within the ecological framework: microsystem,
mesosystem, exosystem, and macrosystem (1977). The ecological framework can provide
conceptual guidance when examining cyberbullying. When a high school student is victimized
by cyberbullying, it can affect all aspects of their life, including their microsystem, mesosystem,
exosystem, and macrosystem (Espelage, Rao & Rue, 2013). For example, a cyberbully victim
reports higher levels of depression, feeling lonely, and school avoidance (Espelage, Rao & Rue,
2013; Sahin, 2012). This example shows how being victimized by cyberbullying affects the
victim at a micro level through the psychological impacts and at a mezzo level through school
avoidance.
The ecological framework aligns well with this study because it views all aspects of how
cyberbullying can impact various parts of an adolescent’s life. This framework helped guide the
questions composed in the survey instrument by having questions that address the micro (e.g. I
felt sad after being victimized by cyberbullying) and mezzo levels (e.g. I stopped going to school
after being victimized by cyberbullying). Framing questions using the ecological framework
will help identify the combined impacts cyberbullying has on an adolescent victim (Espelage, L.,
Rao, M., & Rue, L., 2013). Therefore, this paper uses the framework to help view cyberbullying
victimization.
Methods
Research Design
The research method that was used to study these hypotheses was a mixed methods
approach. The more dominant approach was quantitative, while there was some qualitative
questions to add depth.
A quantitative approach was chosen as the more dominant approach because this study
was looking at human behavior. According to Monette, Sullivan, and DeJong (2010), a
quantitative approach is most appropriate to use when looking at precise human behavior. This
study added in a qualitative approach because using only a quantitative method could cause very
important parts of the human experience to be missed, including personal meanings, feelings,
and the subjective experience (Monette, Sullivan, & DeJong, 2010). Using a mixed methods
approach allowed the precise human behavior and experience to be researched along with the
subjective experience, personal meanings, and feelings the participant may have.
This study was a retrospective study. This means the participants in this study were not
asked about their current experiences, but asked to reflect back on their past experiences from
high school. The time frame the participants were asked to reflect back to was between grades 9-
12. The participants answered the questions based on their experiences during that time frame,
excluding any current experiences.
Sample
This study consisted of 26 participants, who identified as ‘female’ (n=24), ‘male’ (n=1),
and ‘other’ (n=1). The participants in this study were be selected based on their age and being a
current student at the University of St. Thomas or St. Catherine University and enrolled in the
Bachelors of Social Work program. The participants were ages 18-22 years old and were a
mixture of freshman, sophomores, juniors, and seniors.
Participants were recruited through emails that were sent out to undergraduate students
enrolled in the Bachelors of Social Work program at the University of St. Thomas and St.
Catherine University by the Bachelors of Social Work Program Director, Sarah Ferguson. The
researcher provided an email script to Sarah Ferguson that explained the purpose of the study,
why they were chosen to participate, the voluntary nature of the study, confidentiality, how to
contact the researcher with any questions, and provided the link to participate (see appendix A)
Protection of Human Subjects
Directly prior to filling out the survey, the respondent was provided with a consent form
that was approved by the University of St. Thomas and St. Catherine University Institutional
Review Boards (IRB). The consent form explained the background of the study, outlined the
confidentiality procedures, explained any risks and benefits, and explained how the participant
has the freedom to withdraw from the survey at any time (see appendix B). The consent form
appeared as the very first screen of the survey. The participant read through the consent form
and had to click ‘I agree’ to continue participating in the survey or ‘I disagree’ to withdraw from
the survey.
To ensure confidentiality, there was no identifying demographic questions asked. There
was no way for the researcher to identify who participated in the survey as it was all done
anonymously online. The survey was distributed through an anonymous survey link. This
feature allowed no identifying information, such as email addresses, to be collected.
Data Collection
The data collection instrument that was used was an online survey. The survey was
adopted from a study done by Schenk (2011) entitled Internet Experiences Questionnaire (IEQ).
The survey was comprised of questions that could be answered in a variety of ways. There were
open-ended questions where the participant was able to fill in their own responses (e.g. If you
have been the victim of cyberbullying, what was the reason someone did this to you?). There
were also multiple-choice questions where only one answer could be selected (e.g. During your
time in high school, have you received harassing, mean, or nasty text-messages? Yes or No).
Lastly, there were questions that allowed the participant to select several answers (e.g. What do
you think the motive was for someone to cyberbully you? Please check all that apply: Jealousy,
Anger, Revenge, etc.). See appendix C.
The survey included questions regarding demographics, general cyberbullying questions,
questions regarding cyberbully victimization, and its impact. Because Schenk (2011) focused
on college-aged participants and this study is retrospective, asking college-aged participants to
reflect back on their experiences from high school, this survey had minor changes to better
reflect the current population being surveyed. For example, the question On average, how much
money do you spend each month on Internet and cell phone bills was omitted because the survey
participants are reflecting back to their high school experience and this question is not likely
applicable.
There were 20 impact response statements included in the survey, for example, I felt sad
or hurt. In order to test the impact of cyberbullying on suicidal thoughts, the 20 impact response
statements were classified into two categories: emotional and behavioral. For the purpose of this
study, emotional responses were defined as responses that were experienced inward and were
more difficult for other people to notice (e.g. I felt sad or hurt, I felt anxious, I felt lonely). There
were a total of 13 emotional responses that created an emotional impact score for each
respondent. Behavioral responses were defined as responses that were experienced outward and
were more easily noticed by other people (e.g. I missed school because of it, I cried, I acted out).
There were a total of seven behavioral responses that created a behavioral impact score for each
respondent.
Data Analysis
The original research questions proposed in this study were: What are the experiences of
high school students who have been victims of cyberbullying on social networking sites? Are
there gender differences between males and females in the prevalence and impact of
cyberbullying? The hypotheses of this study were: Females will report being victimized by
cyberbullying more often than males, and, females who have been victimized by cyberbullying
will report experiencing a greater negative psycho-social impact than males. There were 26
respondents to this survey, 24 ‘female’, one ‘male’, and one ‘other’ gender. Due to having only
one male participant, this study was unable to analyze gender differences, and therefore, unable
to test the stated hypotheses. Due to the gender response rate, this study was unable to analyze
the overall impact of cyberbullying related to gender. The responses did allow analysis of the
second research question: What are the experiences of high school students who have been
victims of cyberbullying on social networking sites? Given that the initial hypotheses did not
have the data to test them, new hypotheses were created. The new hypotheses of this study were:
(1) There is a significant difference between respondents who had suicidal thoughts and those
who did not have suicidal thoughts on their overall impact score; (2) there is a significant
difference between respondents who had suicidal thoughts and those who did not have suicidal
thoughts on their emotional impact score; and (3) there is a significant difference between
respondents who had suicidal thoughts and those who did not have suicidal thoughts on their
behavioral impact score.
The data will be analyzed both qualitatively and quantitatively. A qualitative analysis
was used to analyze the three open ended questions: If you were a victim of cyberbullying, what
was the reason someone did this to you? (27); If you were the victim of cyberbullying on a social
networking site, how did this impact you? (29); If you were a victim of cyberbullying on a social
networking site, how did you cope with the experience? (31). The qualitative data was analyzed
using a content analysis approach. Content analysis is an objective coding scheme that uses
counts of the text to organize and retrieve data (Monette, Sullivan, & DeJong, 2010). Using this
analysis technique, the researcher looked for common themes in the open ended questions and
counted the number of times those themes appeared.
The quantitative data was analyzed using descriptive statistics and independent t-test.
Descriptive statistics provided a basic description of occurrences in the data, the mean, median,
mode, range, and standard deviation (Monette, Sullivan, & DeJong, 2010). Using descriptive
statistics, the researcher analyzed the most common form of bullying and the most common
impact reported by respondents who were victimized on social networking sites.
An independent t-test was used to analyze the overall impact of cyberbullying between
those who reported suicidal thoughts and those who did not report suicidal thoughts. Using an
independent t-test, the researcher was able to test the three hypotheses allowing the researcher to
see if there is a significant difference between suicidal thoughts and the overall, emotional, and
behavioral impact scores.
Results
The research questions proposed in this study were: What are the experiences of high
school students who have been victims of cyberbullying on social networking sites? Are there
differences between suicidal thoughts and the impact of cyberbullying? The three hypotheses of
this study were: (1) There is a significant difference between respondents who had suicidal
thoughts and those who did not have suicidal thoughts on their overall impact score; (2) there is a
significant difference between respondents who had suicidal thoughts and those who did not
have suicidal thoughts on their emotional impact score; and (3) there is a significant difference
between respondents who had suicidal thoughts and those who did not have suicidal thoughts on
their behavioral impact score.
The sections below will report these findings including sample, the most common form of
cyberbullying, the overall impact of cyberbullying on high school students, and the impact of
cyberbullying on suicidal thoughts.
Sample
The survey was distributed to all of the students enrolled in the University of St. Thomas
and St. Catherine University Bachelors of Social Work program. There were 28 respondents;
however, two surveys were removed due to invalid and incomplete information, leaving a
sample of 26 respondents. The age of the respondents ranged from 18-22 years old, with
majority of respondents age 20 (43%). Majority of respondents were female (93%) and in their
junior year of school (42%). Table 1 displays demographic results of age, gender, and year in
school.
Table 1. Demographic Table
Variable Frequency Percentage

Age
18 3 12%
19 4 15%
20 11 43%
21 4 15%
22 4 15%
Total 26 100%
Gender
Male 1 4%
Female 24 93%
Transgender 0 0%
Other 1 4%
Total 26 100%
Year in School
Freshman 3 12%
Sophomore 6 23%
Junior 11 42%
Senior 6 23%
Total 26 100%
Most Common Method of Cyberbullying
The survey asked respondents if they were ever victims of bullying through seven
different methods including: traditional bullying (face to face, in person bullying), text
messaging, someone creating a website about them, someone sending embarrassing photos of
them, repeated phone calls, masquerading, and social networking sites.

As seen in Figure 1, the findings showed that the most common method of bullying was
through text messaging, with 15 participants reporting having been bullied through text
messaging. The next most common were those who reported being bullied through traditional
bullying (14) followed by participants who reported being bullied through social networking
sites (11).
Figure 1. Methods of Bullying
26
24
22
20
Number of Respondents
18
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
Traditional Text Website Photos Phone Calls Masquerading Social
Bullying Messaging Networking
Sites
Methods of Bullying
Overall Impact of Cyberbullying
To assess how participants responded to being victimized by cyberbullying and the
impacts it had on them, the survey had 20 different potential responses (e.g. I felt sad or hurt, I
felt angry, I cried, I acted out, see appendix C, question 34 for remaining responses). The
participants could select from the list of impact responses to describe whether or not they
responded in that way after being victimized by cyberbullying and the intensity of that response.
Participants rated each response on a 5-point Likert Scale. The possible response options ranged
from 1 (“Never”) to 5 (“Almost Every day”), 1 meaning they never responded in that way and 5
meaning they responded in that way almost every day after being cyberbullied. Descriptive
statistics were used to analyze the mean of each individual impact.
As displayed in Table 2, ‘I felt sad or hurt’ was the most common response identified by
participants, with a mean score of 4.40. The next most common response was ‘I felt frustrated’,
with a mean of 4.30, followed by ‘I felt embarrassed’ with a mean of 4.10.
Table 2 also shows that the minimum value for ‘I felt sad or hurt’ and ‘I felt frustrated’
was 3 (‘A Few Times’). This means that all respondents who were victimized by cyberbullying
identified feeling sad, hurt, or frustrated at least a few times. The minimum values for ‘I felt
angry’, I felt embarrassed’, ‘I felt helpless and/or hopeless’, ‘I cried’, ‘I felt lonely’, and ‘I felt
ashamed’ was 2 (‘Once or Twice’). This means that all respondents who were victimized by
cyberbullying identified experiencing those responses at least once or twice.

Table 2. Mean Impact Score
Response Min Value Max Mean Variance Standard

Value Deviation
I felt sad or hurt 3 5 4.40 .49 .70
I felt angry 2 5 3.88 .98 .99
I felt embarrassed 2 5 4.10 1.12 1.10
I felt afraid 1 5 2.90 1.88 1.37
I felt anxious 1 5 4.00 2.22 1.49
I felt helpless and/or 2 5 4.00 1.25 1.12
hopeless
I felt frustrated 3 5 4.30 .90 .95
I was stressed 1 5 4.00 1.78 1.33
I missed school because 1 4 2.50 1.61 1.27
of it
I cried 2 5 3.70 .90 .95
I had difficulty 5 2.90 1.66 1.29
concentrating 1
My grades have dropped 1 3 1.80 .84 .92
because of it
I became jumpy or 1 5 3.20 2.18 1.48
irritable
I thought about the 1 5 3.10 2.99 1.73
online harassment
almost constantly
I stopped doing 1 4 2.40 1.38 1.17
activities I once enjoyed
I acted out 1 4 1.60 1.16 1.07
I blamed myself 1 5 2.80 2.40 1.55
I felt lonely 2 5 3.60 1.38 1.17
I felt depressed 1 5 3.70 2.46 1.57
I felt ashamed 2 5 3.40 .93 .97
Impact of Cyberbullying on Suicidal Thoughts
To test the impact of cyberbullying on suicidal thoughts, the 20 impact response
statements were classified into two categories: emotional and behavioral. For the purpose of this
study, emotional responses were defined as responses that were experienced inward and were
more difficult for other people to notice (e.g. I felt sad or hurt, I felt anxious, I felt lonely).
Behavioral responses were defined as responses that were experienced outward and were more
easily noticed by other people (e.g. I missed school because of it, I cried, I acted out). There
were a total of 13 emotional responses and seven behavioral responses. The 13 emotional
responses created an emotional impact score for each respondent and the seven behavioral
responses created a behavioral impact score for each respondent. Each respondents overall
impact score is comprised of the 20 impact response statements.
The question “If you were a victim of cyberbullying, have you ever had thoughts of
suicide”(35) originally had four response options: No, Yes, Yes with a plan, and Yes with an
attempt. The answers were recoded into ‘No’ (1) and ‘Yes’ (2), recoding yes with a plan and yes
with an attempt into the ‘Yes’ value. The respondent who identified as ‘other’ gender reported
the only suicide attempt. Three independent t-tests were computed to see if there is a statistically
significant difference between the overall impact of cyberbullying and suicidal thoughts, the
emotional impact of cyberbullying and suicidal thoughts, and the behavioral impact of
cyberbullying and suicidal thoughts.
There were four participants who have been victimized by cyberbullying on a social
networking site who responded ‘no’ to ever having suicidal thoughts. There were seven
participants who have been victimized by cyberbullying on social networking sites, including the
participant with an attempt, who responded ‘yes’ to ever having suicidal thoughts. Two of the
participants who have been victimized by cyberbullying responded ‘yes’ to having suicidal
thoughts but did not answer any of the 20 impact response questions. Because they did not
answer the impact response questions, they did not have an impact score and therefore their data
was omitted from the independent t-test analyses.
Overall impact of cyberbullying. The independent variable measured whether
respondents who were victimized by cyberbullying had suicidal thoughts or not. The dependent
variable measured the respondents overall impact score. The research hypothesis is: There is a
significant difference between respondents who had suicidal thoughts and those who did not
have suicidal thoughts on their overall impact score. The null hypothesis for the study is: There
is no significant difference between respondents who had suicidal thoughts and those who did
not have suicidal thoughts on their overall impact score.
Table 3 displays the results of the t-test comparing overall impact score and suicidal
thoughts. The Levene’s Test of Equality of Variance for the independent samples t-test is .422.
Since .422 is greater than .05, the Levene’s Test is not significant. Therefore, the p-value for this
t-test is .647. Since the p-value is greater than .05, the results of this data are not statistically
significant. As a result, we fail to reject the null hypothesis that there is no significant difference
their overall impact score. Therefore, there is not a significant difference between respondents
who had suicidal thoughts and those who did not have suicidal thoughts on their responses to
being victimized by cyberbullying.
Table 3. Independent T-Test for Overall Impact Score and Suicidal Thoughts
Independent Samples Test
Levene's Test for

Equality of
Variances t-test for Equality of Means
95% Confidence
Interval of the
Sig. (2- Mean Std. Error Difference
F Sig. t df tailed) Difference Difference Lower Upper
Impact Equal variances

.798 .422 -.495 4 .647 -8.667 17.509 -57.279 39.945
assumed
Equal variances
-.495 3.594 .649 -8.667 17.509 -59.521 42.188
not assumed
Emotional impact of cyberbullying. The independent variable measured whether
variable measured the respondent’s emotional impact score. The research hypothesis is: There is
a significant difference between respondents who had suicidal thoughts and those who did not
have suicidal thoughts on their emotional impact score. The null hypothesis for the study is:
There is no significant difference between respondents who had suicidal thoughts and those who
did not have suicidal thoughts on their emotional impact score.
Tables four and five display the results of the t-test comparing the mean difference in
emotional impact score between respondents who had suicidal thoughts and those who did not.
The mean score of respondents without suicidal thoughts was 40.00. The mean score of
participants with suicidal thoughts was 50.80. The difference between the mean scores was
10.80. Therefore, participants with suicidal thoughts reported a higher emotional impact score.
The Levene’s Test of Equality of Variance for the independent samples t-test is .796.
their emotional impact score. Therefore, there is not a significant difference between
emotional responses to being victimized by cyberbullying.

Table 4. Group Statistics for Emotional Impact Score and Suicidal Thoughts
Group Statistics
SuicideR N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean
Emotional 1.00 4 40.00 12.055 6.028
2.00 5 50.80 12.950 5.791
Table 5. Independent T-Test for Emotional Impact Score and Suicidal Thoughts
Levene's Test for

Equality of
95% Confidence
Sig. Interval of the
(2- Mean Std. Error Difference
Emotional Equal
-
variances .072 .796 7 .241 -10.800 8.435 -30.746 9.146
1.280
assumed
Equal
-
variances not 6.769 .239 -10.800 8.359 -30.704 9.104
1.292
assumed
Behavioral impact of cyberbullying. The independent variable measured whether
variable measured the respondent’s behavioral impact score. The research hypothesis is: There
is a significant difference between respondents who had suicidal thoughts and those who did not
have suicidal thoughts on their behavioral impact score. The null hypothesis for the study is:
There is no significant difference between respondents who had suicidal thoughts and those who
did not have suicidal thoughts on their behavioral impact score.

Tables five and six display the results of the t-test comparing the mean difference in
behavioral impact score between respondents who had suicidal thoughts and those who did not.
The mean score of respondents without suicidal thoughts was 16.75. The mean score of
respondents with suicidal thoughts was 20.20. The difference between the mean scores was
3.45. Therefore, participants with suicidal thoughts reported a higher behavioral impact score.
The Levene’s Test of Equality of Variance for the independent samples t-test is .787.
their behavioral impact score. Therefore, there is not a significant difference between
behavioral responses to being victimized by cyberbullying.
Table 5. Group Statistics for Behavioral Impact Score and Suicidal Thoughts
Group Statistics
SuicideR N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean
Behavioral 1.00 4 16.75 6.652 3.326

2.00 5 20.20 6.301 2.818
Table 6. Independent T-Test for Behavioral Impact Score and Suicidal Thoughts
Levene's Test for

Equality of
95% Confidence
Interval of the
Sig. (2- Mean Std. Error Difference
Behavioral Equal
-
variances .079 .787 7 .452 -3.450 4.329 -13.687 6.787
.797
assumed
Equal
-
variances not 6.385 .457 -3.450 4.359 -13.963 7.063
.791
assumed
Qualitative Analysis
The survey had three qualitative questions: If you were a victim of cyberbullying, what
was the reason someone did this to you? (27); If you were the victim of cyberbullying on a social
networking site, how did this impact you? (29); If you were a victim of cyberbullying on a social
networking site, how did you cope with the experience? (31). Each question was analyzed
separately using content analysis to find common themes among the respondents answers.
What reasons did someone do this to you? After interpreting the responses for this
question, three main themes emerged: jealousy, not fitting in, and falling out with friends.
Jealousy. Jealousy was identified as a theme for the reason someone cyberbullied the
respondent and is supported by the following quote:
I was good friends with her new boyfriend and she was jealous…
Multiple respondents put a single word answer just saying “jealousy” as their sole reason
someone cyberbullied them and did not go into detail.

Not fitting in. Not fitting in was identified as a theme for the reason someone
cyberbullied the respondent and is supported by the following quote:
I come from a very small town with a small school where everyone knows everyone. I
didn’t fit the norm, and I didn’t want to fit the norm.
Respondents also stated that being overweight and not fitting in because of that was a
reason for being cyberbullied and is supported by the following quote:
My weight. Appearances.
Falling out with friends. Having a falling out with a friend or friends was identified as a
theme for the reason someone cyberbullied the respondent and is supported by the following
quote:
I had a falling out with a friend, so she posted things about me and my character.
Multiple participants talked about how they were once friends with someone or they
thought someone was their friend and then that person turned on them and began to bully
them on weaknesses of theirs and is supported by the following quote:
Not sure they seemed like they were my friend and then turned behind my back and did it.
How did this impact you? After interpreting the responses for this question, two main
themes emerged: experiencing negative emotional impact and lowered self-esteem.
Experiencing negative emotional impact. Many respondents stated they experienced
negative emotional impacts including feeling depressed, sad, upset, and hurt after they were
victimized by cyberbullying on social networking sites. This is supported by the following
quotes:
I became very sad and depressed. I started questioning my own worth.
Another participant responded:

It hurt me a lot and made me cry.. A LOT. I contemplated suicide many times.
Participants who experienced negative emotional impacts after being victimized by
cyberbullying also appeared to question who they are, which is supported by the following
quote:
I questioned who I was a lot, and I became depressed.
Lowered self-esteem. Having a lowered self-esteem after being cyberbullied on social
networking sites was a theme that emerged and is supported by the following quote:
Lowered self-esteem, self-consciousness, introversion, depression, anxiety.
Another participant responded:
It made me really upset, I stopped eating because I thought I was too fat and felt bad
about myself.
It appears that participants who had a lowered self-esteem as a result of being victimized
by cyberbullying also experienced negative emotional impacts. This is demonstrated in the first
quote where the respondent states they experienced a lowered self-esteem and also became
depressed.
How did you cope? After interpreting the responses for this question, one main theme
emerged: by seeking out support. This theme is supported by the following quotes:
I was in a bad place for a long time, but then I went to counseling.
Another respondent stated:
At first, I disconnected and started to self-harm. After a while, I found a group of people
with no ties to my school who were supportive. I turned things around and began
volunteering.
Although it was not a significant theme, one respondent coped by keeping it to
themselves. One respondent told their story of how they were cyberbullied by an older man they
met on an internet gaming site. The respondent and the man formed an online relationship that
went on for a while. The respondent felt comfort in talking with this man and believed he was
one of their only friends at the time that they could trust. Having his support helped the
respondent cope with their already existing depression. He took advantage of the respondent and
mentally and emotionally abused them without the respondent even realizing it. The respondent
did not realize the level of inappropriateness their relationship was at until this man’s wife
emailed them asking who the respondent was. This man had lied to the respondent and said he
did not have a wife and kids, when in reality he did. This respondent went on to talk about how
this affected her and how they coped, which is supported by the following quote:
I coped with this in an unhealthy way because I did not tell anyone out of fear of getting
in trouble. I experienced anxiety from this situation for a long time and still get worried
when I think about it, so I try not to think about it. I apologize for writing so much about
this to you - it feels nice to be able to share my experience with someone.
This respondent found comfort in being able to share their story in an anonymous survey
and to get their feelings out.
Discussion
The primary intent of this research study was to explore the experiences of high school
students who have been victimized by cyberbullying. A mixed methods approach was utilized to
allow the precise human behavior and experience to be researched along with the subjective
experience, personal meanings, and feelings the participant may have, which allowed for a more
comprehensive assessment of the research. The results of the survey were then examined
through a quantitative and qualitative process.
Quantitative Analysis
Descriptive statistics analysis and independent t-test were the two methods utilized to
examine the quantitative data. The descriptive statistics were used to analyze the most common
form of cyberbullying, and the overall impact of cyberbullying. The first independent t-test was
utilized to examine the relationship between suicidal thoughts and the participants overall impact
scale score. The same analysis was then completed to examine the relationship between suicidal
thoughts and the participants emotional scale score and between suicidal thoughts and the
participants behavioral scale score.
Results indicated that the most common form of bullying was through text messaging,
followed by traditional bullying, and then social networking sites. Current literature found that
even with the increase in access to electronics, traditional bullying is more common than
cyberbullying (Schenk, 2011; Schneider, O’Donnell, Stueve, & Coulter, 2012). A study done by
Schenk (2011) found that the most common method of cyberbully was through text messaging
and phone calls, which is congruent with the results of this study. With the increase in smart
phones and cell phone use, adolescents are able to access text messaging and the internet easier.
This makes it easier for adolescents to bully through electronic means at any time of the day.
Traditional bullying often takes place at school (Schneider, O’Donnell, Stueve, & Coulter,
2012). Bullying through text messaging or over the internet can take place anywhere at any
time. Bullying that is done through electronics can be done anonymously much easier than
traditional bullying. According to a study done by Sticca and Perren (2013), an adolescent who is
victimized by an anonymous bullying was found to be the most severe kind of bullying.
Bullying through electronics can be done anywhere at any time and done anonymously,
suggesting that cyberbullying could be done more often and easier than traditional bullying.
Survey results indicated that the most common impact response was emotional and
included ‘I felt sad or hurt’ followed by ‘I felt frustrated’. This aligns with previous literature
which found that adolescents who have been victimized by cyberbullying reported feelings of
unhappiness and often felt sad and rejected afterwards (Bauman, Toomey, & Walker, 2013;
Gimenez et al, 2015; Sahin, 2012). Bauman, Toomey, and Walker (2013) found that adolescents
who are victimized by cyberbullying reported higher rates of depression. The results of this
survey found that feelings of depression was not as common of a response rate as feeling sad or
hurt and feeling helpless and/or hopeless. One could argue that feeling sad, hurt, helpless and
hopeless are all common characteristics of depression, which would align with previous
literature that depression is a common response to cyberbully victimization.
Survey results from all three of the t-test’s indicated no significant relationship between
suicidal thoughts and the respondents overall scale score, emotional scale score, and behavioral
scale score. This means there is not a significant relationship between the impacts of cyberbully
victimization on suicidal thoughts. The results did show a difference in mean scores. The mean
score of participants who had suicidal thoughts was higher than those who did not report suicidal
thoughts for both the emotional impact score and the behavioral impact score. This means that
participants with higher emotional and behavioral impact scores reported having suicidal
thoughts. The limited sample size likely contributed to the overall lack of statistical significance
of this study.
There were seven participants who have been victimized by cyberbullying on social
networking sites who responded ‘yes’ to ever having suicidal thoughts. Two of these
participants did not fill out the impact response questions, causing their data to be omitted from
the independent t-test. Four participants who have been victimized responded ‘no’ to ever
having suicidal thoughts. There were 11 participants who reported being victimized on social
networking sites. This means that 63% (n=7) of the participants who reported being victimized
by cyberbullying on social networking sites have had suicidal thoughts and 36% (n=4) have not
had suicidal thoughts.
Previous research is controversial over whether cyberbullying predicts suicide or not.
Studies have found a link between depression, suicidal ideation, and suicide attempts and a link
between depression and suicide, but studies have been unable to find if cyberbullying
victimization predicts suicide (Bauman, Toomey & Walker, 2013; Litwiller & Brausch, 2013;
Schenk, 2011). A study done by Schenk (2011) found that 10% of respondents who were
victimized by cyberbullying reported suicidal ideations and 0% of the control group reported
them, suggesting a link between cyberbully victimization and suicide.
There was one participant who reported having a suicide attempt after being victimized
by cyberbullying. This participant was also the only participant to identify their gender as
‘other’. This participant reported that they were cyberbullied because they did not fit in with the
rest of their peers and went against the norm. Research has found a link between cyberbullying
and sexual orientation. Hinduja and Patchin (2011) found that almost twice as many respondents
who identified as lesbian, gay, bisexual or transgender (LGBT) reported being victimized by
cyberbullying in their lifetime (36.1%) compared to heterosexual respondents (20.1%). Hinduja
and Patchin also looked at differences in experiences in the previous 30 days of the respondents
taking the survey and found that 17.3% of LGBT participants reported being victimized by
cyberbullying compared to 6.8% of heterosexual participants (2011). This suggests that

individuals who do not identify as heterosexual are more likely to be bullied based on their
sexual orientation. It is important for social workers to be aware of the difficulties adolescents
who are viewed as different by their peers face and provide extra support for them when
possible.
Qualitative Analysis
A qualitative analysis was completed by examining the three open ended survey
questions that primarily focused on the reason the respondent was cyberbullied, the impact it had
on them, and how they coped with the victimization. Each question was analyzed for themes
separately and as the data was analyzed, themes were developed.
Reasons for victimization. Transcription of the qualitative data in this question revealed
three primary reasons the respondents believed was the reasoning for being victimized by
cyberbullying: jealousy, not fitting in, and falling out with a friend. Walrave and Heriman
(2011) found that the three most common motives behind cyberbullying, reported by teens who
cyberbully, are that it was revenge to the victim, that the victim deserved it, or just because it
was fun. Being victimized because the perpetrator is jealous or was once the victim’s friend and
they had a falling out could be fueled by revenge to the victim.
The theme of not fitting in aligns with a study done by Hinduja and Patchin (2008) which
found that bullies often chose their victim based on their differences. Bullies will seek out those
who have differences, whether it is a disability, their looks, or the way they act, bullies will pick
up on those differences and tease the victim because of them (Hinduja & Patchin, 2008). This
directly relates to the respondent who identified their gender as ‘other’ and was severely bullied.
The person described feeling different and not wanting to fit into the norm, and that other people
did not like that and would bully in response. Society tries to steer people away from being
different and tries to get everyone to conform, finding what is considered ‘normal’. When an
adolescent deviates away from what the society sees as normal, a bully picks up on that and
tends to bully the person over their differences from society.
Impact of cyberbullying. Transcription of the qualitative data in this question revealed
two main themes of how participants who were victimized by cyberbullying were impacted:
experiencing a negative emotional impact and lowered self-esteem. Negative emotional impacts
described by the participant included feeling depressed, sad, upset, hurt, and anxious. This
aligns with previous research studies that suggest teens who have been victimized can have
negative emotional experiences (Bauman, Toomey & Walker, 2013; Dredge, Gleeson, & Garcia,
2014; Gimenez, 2015; Sahin, 2012). Studies have found that adolescents who have been
victimized by cyberbullying reported feeling sad, feelings of unhappiness, and report depression
more frequently than those who have not been victimized (Bauman, Toomey & Walker, 2013;
Gimenez, 2015; Sahin, 2012).
A study done by Tokunaga (2010) found that being a victim of cyberbullying can cause
psychosocial problems, specifically social anxiety. The negative emotional experiences reported
by participants in this study are consistent with those in the literature. In this study, there was
not one participant who reported being victimized by cyberbullying who did not experience at
least one negative emotional impact. All participants reported being impacted in a negative way.
Respondents who reported experiencing lower levels of self-esteem after being
victimized by cyberbullying is consistent with previous research (Brewer & Kerslake, 2015).
Brewer and Kerslake (2015) found that adolescents who reported being victimized by
cyberbullying also reported low levels of self-esteem. It is not clear if the cyberbully
victimization is what caused the lower levels of self-esteem or if the perpetrators targeted those
individuals with lower levels of self-esteem because they were regarded as an ‘easy target’
(Brewer & Kerslake, 2015). As stated above, perpetrators prey on individuals who are seen as
being different than the norm because they are an easy target. This suggests that individuals who
have lower levels of self-esteem are more likely to be victimized by cyberbullying because they
are seen as an easy target also. More research needs to be done to see if cyberbully victimization
results in lower levels of self-esteem.
Ways of coping. Analysis of the qualitative data in this question revealed that
respondents primarily coped with being victimized by cyberbullying through seeking out
support. Participants who were victimized by cyberbullying primarily turned to friends for
support, while some turned to their parents, a trusted adult, or a counselor. This is inconsistent
with previous research, which found that many of adolescents who have been victimized by
cyberbullying did not talk to anyone about it (Dehue, Bolman, & Vollink, 2008). Adolescents
who did talk to someone about it talked to their parents or caregivers most and rarely talked to
their teachers (Dehue, Bolman, & Vollink, 2008). On the other hand, a study done by Schenk
(2011) found that college-aged students who were victimized by cyberbullying coped with it by
talking with friends and getting support from them. The difference between high school students
not talking to anyone and college-aged students turning to their friends for support could be
caused by age difference. On the other hand, if adolescents do talk to someone they tend to turn
to their parents, where college-aged students turn to their friends. This difference could be
caused by the atmosphere high school students and college-aged students are surrounded in.
High school students are still living at home with their parents while college-aged students are
often living out of the house with their friends. More research should be done looking at the
difference between coping methods between high school students and college-aged students who
have been victimized by cyberbullying.
While it was not a primary theme found, one respondent who identified as other gender
reported coping with it by ignoring it. The respondent reported being scared to tell anyone about
the experience for fear of the man finding them or fearing that they would get in trouble. This
respondent told their story and stated that it felt good to be able to share their story with
someone. It appears this respondent found benefit in talking about their story, even if it was to
someone anonymously.
Implications for Social Work
It is important for social workers to be aware of the impact cyberbullying victimization
has on adolescents. Being victimized by cyberbullying appears to impact how an adolescent
functions in their day-to-day life. Even if victims are experiencing negative impacts, including
feeling sad, depressed, or suicidal, they may not talk with people about their feelings. If a social
worker is working with an adolescent who has been bullied, it is likely that adolescent is
experiencing negative emotions as a result of it, even if they are not sharing about them.
Although the relationship between an adolescent’s cyberbullying victimization and their
thoughts of suicide was not significant, the literature suggests a link. This raises a critical safety
concern that social workers should be aware of when working with adolescents.
Cyberbullying is a growing problem in today’s society impacting the quality of life for
adolescents. The findings contribute to the already existing research demonstrating that
cyberbullying is a growing problem that needs to be addressed. Social workers should focus on
finding a way to address cyberbullying at a macro level and increase supports for adolescents
who have been victimized.

Future research should continue to explore any gender differences among the impacts
experienced by cyberbully victimization. This study was unable to explore any gender
differences due to the limitation among the gender in the sample. Future research should also
look into how cyberbully victimization impacts adolescents who identify as homosexual,
transgender, or other gender. The current data suggests that adolescents who identify as a gender
other than male or female experience more negative emotional impacts compared to those who
identify as male or female.
Future research should also continue to explore the link between cyberbully victimization
and suicidal ideation. The current data and previous literature suggests a link, but no studies
have found a significant and direct relationship between the two.
Finally, future research should look at the prevalence of previous mental health problems,
like anxiety, depression, and lower self-esteem in adolescents who have been victimized by
cyberbullying. Studies should be done to see if cyberbullying causes these problems or if they
were present before the bullying and were made worse as a result of it.
Strengths and Limitations
A strength of this study was using a mixed method approach. By adding in qualitative
questions, the researcher was able to gain more in-depth information regarding the cyberbully
victim’s experience. The researcher was able to gain knowledge of different impacts and
experiences that were not one of the choice answers in the survey. By having open-ended
questions, a participant was able to share their story and the researcher was able to gather
valuable information regarding this experience.
There were multiple limitations of this study. One limitation was the sample size. The
sample in this study was undergraduate college students enrolled in the University of St. Thomas
and St. Catherine University Bachelors of Social Work program. This population is not
generalizable to the general population, and is only representative of the University of St.
Thomas and St. Catherine University.
A second limitation was the population used in this study in relation to gender.
According to the Council on Social Work Education (2013), majority of full-time and part-time
students enrolled in baccalaureate level social work education programs are female. In 2013,
87.2% of students enrolled in bachelor level social work education programs were female while
only 12.8% were males (Council on Social Work Education, 2013). Having so many females
and so few males enrolled in social work education programs makes it difficult to get a sufficient
amount of male participants to study gender differences.
A third limitation was the design of the questionnaire. The design was retrospective and
the researcher asked college students to reflect back on their experiences in high school.
Because there was a time gap between when the participant experienced the cyberbullying and
when they are reporting how it made them feel, it could have caused participants to underreport
how it actually made them feel or the true impact being victimized by cyberbullying had on
them.
Conclusion
The purpose of this study was to explore the experiences of adolescents who have been
victimized by cyberbullying. This study found that adolescents who have been victimized by
cyberbullying report experiencing negative emotional impacts, which is supported by previous
literature. The findings of this study are important and useful for social workers to gain insight
into the experiences that adolescents who have been victimized by cyberbullying have had.
References
Bauman, S., Toomey, R. B., & Walker, J. L. (2013). Associations among bullying,
cyberbullying, and suicide in high school students. Journal of Adolescence, 36(2), 341-350.
doi:http://dx.doi.org.ezproxy.stthomas.edu/10.1016/j.adolescence.2012.12.001
Brewer, G., & Kerslake, J. (2015). Cyberbullying, self-esteem, empathy and
loneliness. Computers in Human Behavior, 48(0), 255-260.
doi:http://dx.doi.org.ezproxy.stthomas.edu/10.1016/j.chb.2015.01.073
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1977). Toward an experimental ecology of human development. American
Psychologist, 32, 513–531. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.32.7.513
Bullying Statistics (n.d.). Cyber bullying statistics. Retrieved from
http://www.bullyingstatistics.org/content/cyber-bullying-statistics.html.
Council on Social Work Education (2013). 2013 annual statistics on social work education in
the United States. Retrieved from http://www.cswe.org/File.aspx?id=74478.
Dehue, F., Bolman, C., & Völlink, T. (2008). Cyberbullying: Youngsters' experiences and
parental perception. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 11(2), 217-223.
doi:10.1089/cpb.2007.0008
Dredge, R., Gleeson, J., & de la Piedad Garcia, X. (2014). Cyberbullying in social networking
sites: An adolescent victim’s perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 36(0), 13-20.
Espelage, D. L., Rao, M. A., & Rue, D. L. (2013). Current research on school-based bullying: A
social-ecological perspective. Journal of Social Distress & the Homeless, 22(1), 7-21.
doi:10.1179/1053078913Z.0000000002
Giménez Gualdo, A. M., Hunter, S. C., Durkin, K., Arnaiz, P., & Maquilón, J. J. (2015). The
emotional impact of cyberbullying: Differences in perceptions and experiences as a function
of role. Computers & Education, 82(0), 228-235.
Hinduja, S., & Patchin, J. W. (2008). Cyberbullying: An exploratory analysis of factors related to
offending and victimization. Deviant Behavior, 29(2), 129-156.
doi:10.1080/01639620701457816
Hinduja, S., & Patchin, J. W. (2011). Cyberbullying research summary: Bullying, cyberbullying
and sexual orientation. Retrieved from
http://cyberbullying.org/cyberbullying_sexual_orientation_fact_sheet.pdf.
Karklins, L., & Dalton, D. (2012). Social networking sites and the dangers they pose to youth:
Some australian findings. Current Issues in Criminal Justice, 24(2), 205-222. Retrieved
from http://ezproxy.stthomas.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/lo
gin.aspx?direct=true&db=sih&AN=84312191&site=ehost-live
Lenhart, A., Madden, M., Smith, A., Purcell, K., Zickuhr, K., & Rainie, L., (2011). Teens,
kindness and cruelty on social network sites. Retrieved from
http://www.pewinternet.org/2011/11/09/teens-kindness-and-cruelty-on-social-network-
sites/.
Li, Q. (2007). Bullying in the new playground: Research into cyberbullying and cyber
victimization. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 23, 435-454.
Litwiller, B., & Brausch, A. (2013). Cyber bullying and physical bullying in adolescent suicide:
The role of violent behavior and substance use. Journal of Youth & Adolescence, 42(5),
675-684. doi:10.1007/s10964-013-9925-5
Meier, Tina. (n.d). Bullying, cyberbullying, and suicide statistics. Retrieved from
http://www.meganmeierfoundation.org/statistics.html.
Monette, D.R., Sullivan, T. J. & DeJong, C.R. (2010). Applied social research: Tool for the
human services (8th Ed.). Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole (ISBN 0-15-505823-1).
Palmeri, J. (2011). “Cyberbullicide:” When cyberbully victims can’t escape. Retrieved from
http://steinhardt.nyu.edu/opus/issues/2011/spring/cyberbullicide
Patton, D. U., Hong, J. S., Ranney, M., Patel, S., Kelley, C., Eschmann, R., et al. (2014). Social
media as a vector for youth violence: A review of the literature. Computers in Human
Behavior, 35(0), 548-553.s
Pettalia, J. L., Levin, E., & Dickinson, J. (2013). Cyberbullying: Eliciting harm without
consequence. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(6), 2758-2765.
Reich, S. M. (2010). Adolescents' sense of community on myspace and facebook: A mixed-
methods approach. Journal of Community Psychology, 38(6), 688-705.
doi:10.1002/jcop.20389
ŞAHİN, M. (2012). The relationship between the cyberbullying/cybervictmization and loneliness
among adolescents. Children and Youth Services Review, 34(4), 834-837.
doi:http://dx.doi.org.ezproxy.stthomas.edu/10.1016/j.childyouth.2012.01.010
Schenk, A. M. (2011). Psychological impact of cyberbully victimization among college students.
(M.S., West Virginia University). ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, Retrieved from
http://search.proquest.com/docview/894258387?accountid=14756
Schneider, S. K., O'Donnell, L., Stueve, A., & Coulter, R. W. S. (2012). Cyberbullying, school
bullying, and psychological distress: A regional census of high school students. American
Journal of Public Health, 102(1), 171-177. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2011.300308
School of Social Work, College of St. Catherine & University of St. Thomas (2006).
Social work for social justice: Ten principles. Retrieved from:
http://www.stthomas.edu/socialwork/socialjustice/default.html
Sengupta, A., & Chaudhuri, A. (2011). Are social networking sites a source of online harassment
for teens? Evidence from survey data. Children and Youth Services Review, 33(2), 284-290.
Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org.ezproxy.stthomas.edu/10.1016/j.childyouth.2010.09.011
Sticca, F., & Perren, S. (2013). Is cyberbullying worse than traditional bullying? Examining the
differential roles of medium, publicity, and anonymity for the perceived severity of
bullying. Journal of Youth & Adolescence, 42(5), 739-750. doi:10.1007/s10964-012-9867-3
Tokunaga, R. S. (2010). Following you home from school: A critical review and synthesis of
research on cyberbullying victimization. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(3), 277-287.
US Department of Health and Human Services (n.d.). Stopbullying.gov. Retrieved from
http://www.stopbullying.gov/index.html
Walrave, M., & Heirman, W. (2011). Cyberbullying: Predicting victimisation and
perpetration. Children & Society, 25(1), 59-72. doi:10.1111/j.1099-0860.2009.00260.x
Ybarra, M. L., & Mitchell, K. J. (2007). Prevalence and frequency of internet harassment
instigation: Implications for adolescent health. Journal of Adolescent Health, 41(2), 189-
195. Retrieved from
http://dx.doi.org.ezproxy.stthomas.edu/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.03.005
Appendix A
This survey is for undergraduate students ages 18-22 only.
My name is Hillary Noll and I am a student in the MSW program I am conducting a study about
the impacts cyberbullying on social networking sites have on adolescents. I invite you to
participate in this research. You were identified as a possible participant because you are
currently a student at the University of St. Thomas or St. Catherine University, and may meet the
age requirements for this study given your participation in the BSW program, which are ages 18-
22. The BSW program has many non-traditional age students who would not be eligible.
The purpose of this study is to explore the experiences of former high school students who have
been victims of cyberbullying. This study aims to look at the impacts cyberbullying has on high
school students through assessing information filled out in a survey by college student’s ages 18-
22 who are reflecting back on their high school experience.
You participation in this study is entirely voluntary. Your decision on whether or not to
participate will not affect your current or future relations with the University of St. Thomas, St.
Catherine University, and the School of Social Work. This study is done completely
anonymously online. There will be no identifying information asked and no way for me to
identify who participated in this study.
If you agree to be in this study, I will ask you to complete the following online survey comprised
of multiple choice and open-ended questions. The survey will take approximately 10-15
minutes.
Please click the following link to participate in this study:
Thank you for your participation.
If you have any questions you can contact me at [email protected]

Appendix B
U NIVERSITY OF S T . T HOMAS
Cyberbullying: Impacting today’s Youth
832220-1
Please read this carefully before you decide to participate in this survey
This project has been approved by the Institutional Review Board at the University of St. Thomas.
I am conducting a study about the impacts cyberbullying on social networking sites have on adolescents. I
invite you to participate in this research. I hope to find more information regarding the psycho-social impact
cyberbullying has on high school students. This information will be helpful to social workers and anyone
else working with vulnerable adolescents because it will help them better understand the adolescent victims
experiences and what they could be feeling as a result of the cyberbullying. You were identified as a
possible participant because you meet the age requirements for this study.
This study is being conducted by: Hillary Noll, a graduate student at the School of Social Work, University
of St. Thomas and is supervised by Melissa Lundquist.
Procedures:
If you agree to be in this study, I will ask you to do the following things: Complete the following online
survey comprised of multiple choice and open ended questions regarding cyberbullying. The survey will
take approximately 10-15 minutes to complete. This survey will consist of approximately 40-50
participants.
Risks and Benefits of Being in the Study:
This study has several risks. First, this study will ask you to recall your experiences being a cyberbully or
being victimized by cyberbullying, which could potentially be a traumatic or distressing event. Second,
this study could cause possible emotional distress due to recalling that traumatic event. Third, this study
will be probing for information about your experience with cyberbullying which is personal and sensitive
information. Fourth, because this survey is asking about sensitive information about a potentially traumatic
time, it could cause you to feel mentally fatigued or embarrassed. If you become distressed, upset, or
fatigued while filling out the survey, you have the right to withdraw at any time.
If this survey causes you to feel upset, re-traumatized, or distressed in anyway, please contact the
Counseling and Psychological Services offered by the University of St. Thomas or the Crisis Connection
Hotline. St. Thomas Counseling and Psychological Services is a service that provides counseling and other
helpful services to all St. Thomas students. The services offered include individual and group counseling,
crisis and emergency numbers, and general information about the center.
http://www.stthomas.edu/counseling/. The Crisis Connection Hotline is a free resource to anyone who is
struggling and needs help or someone to talk to and can be contacted at 612-379-6363.
If this survey caused you to feel re-traumatized and you feel you are in immediate danger and cannot keep
yourself safe, please call 911.
This study has no direct benefits.
Confidentiality:
This survey is designed to be completely anonymous. There will be no identifying information asked and
no way to identify who participated in this study. Information based on the results of this study will be
published. The data will be kept until June 1, 2016 and then will be destroyed.
Voluntary Nature of the Study:
Your participation in this study is entirely voluntary. Your decision whether or not to participate will not
affect your current or future relations with the University of St. Thomas or your professors. If you decide
to participate, you are free to withdraw at any time throughout the survey without penalty by clicking the
‘X’ in the top right corner which will close the browser and allow you to exit the survey. Should you decide
to withdraw data collected about you will not be used in the study. You are also free to skip any questions
on the survey.
Contacts and Questions:
My name is Hillary Noll. If you have any questions regarding the survey or the study, you may contact me
at [email protected] or 612-799-3532. You may also contact my research advisor, Melissa
Lundquist at [email protected] or 651-962-5813. You may also contact the University of St.
Thomas Institutional Review Board at 651-962-6035 with any questions or concerns.
Consent Questions:
Before you agree or disagree to participation, please ask yourself these questions and make sure that you
can answer them. If you cannot answer a question, please revisit the information on this page or call me
before you take this survey.
1. What should you do if you wish to withdraw from this survey?
2. What are the risks if you choose to participate?
3. What resources should you utilize if you experience these risks?
4. Who do you contact if you have any questions regarding this survey?
Statement of Consent:
I have read the above information. I have been able to answer the above questions. I consent to participate
in the study. I am at least 18 years of age. By clicking “I agree” it means you consent to participate in the
following study. By clicking “I disagree” it means you do not consent to participate in the following study,
which will not allow you to participate in the survey.
[X] I agree [X] I disagree

Appendix C
Tell us about yourself:
The following questions address information regarding your personal characteristics and experiences.
Please answer the following questions as honestly as possible. If you feel uncomfortable answering
any questions you may decline to answer it.
1. What is your age? _________
2. How do you identify your gender?
3. What is your current class status? (check one):

Freshman Sophomore Junior Senior Other
4. Have you ever sought mental health counseling?

Yes No
5. Approximately how many hours are you online on a typical day?
Your Experiences
Please reflect back to your experiences in high school when answering the following questions:
For this section, bullying is when someone repeatedly says mean or hurtful things to another
individual. This includes teasing, hitting or fighting, threats, leaving you out on purpose, or telling
lies or starting rumors about you.
6. When you were in high school, were you ever bullied?

Yes No
Cyberbullying is defined as repeatedly harassing someone using technology such as email, instant
messaging, social networking sites, blogs, other websites, cell phones, text messaging, picture
messaging, video messaging, etc. with the intent of harming, embarrassing, or damaging the other
individual. Cyberbullying also includes a person pretending to be someone they are not to embarrass,
harass, or harm others.
TEXT MESSAGING
7. When you were in high school, did you ever receive harassing, mean, or nasty text-messages?
Yes No
8. How many times did this occur?

0
1
2–3
4–7
8 – 14
15 or more
9. If yes to Question 7, who sent the harassing, mean, or nasty text messages to you? (Please check
all that apply)
____ Ex-Boyfriend/Girlfriend ____ Friend/former friend ____ Classmate
____ Neighbor ____ Uncertain Other (please describe):_______
____ Not applicable
INTERNET
10. When you were in high school, did you ever have someone create a website about you, use your
pictures on-line without your permission, post damaging or embarrassing information about you,
create forums about you, repeatedly send you harassing emails or instant messages, receive abusive
chat room messages, etc?
Yes No

0
1
2–3
4–7
8 – 14
15 or more
12. If yes to Question 10, who was doing it? (Please check all that apply)
____ Not applicable
PICTURE/VIDEO PHONES
13. When you were in high school, did you ever have someone take embarrassing or degrading
pictures or videos of you with picture/video phones without your permission and show the
pictures/videos to others to embarrass you?
Yes No

0
1
2–3
4–7
8 – 14
15 or more
____ Not applicable
PHONE CALLS
16. When you were in high school, were you ever repeatedly called on your mobile phone by a
person/people not saying anything or leaving nasty/upsetting messages?
Yes No

0
1
2–3
4–7
8 – 14
15 or more
____ Not applicable
MASQUERADING
19. When you were in high school, did you ever have someone pretend to be someone they were
not and post or send material to damage your friendships or reputation, and/or hurt or embarrass you?
Yes No

0
1
2–3
4–7
8 – 14
15 or more
____ Not applicable
22. If you have encountered someone using the Internet or cellular phones pretending to be someone
they were not, did they pretend to be you or someone else?
Me Someone else Both Not Applicable
GENERAL CYBERBULLYING
23. When you were in high school, were you ever a victim of cyberbullying on social networking
sites (example: Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, Myspace, etc.)?
Yes No
24. If you were cyberbullied on a social networking site, what sorts of comments/remarks were
made? (Please check all that apply)
_____ Appearance
_____ Race
_____ Sexual Orientation
_____ Sexual Activity
_____ Intelligence
_____ Self-worth
_____ Religion
_____ Social status
_____ Other: Please describe.
_____ I have never been cyberbullied
25. If you were cyberbullied on a social networking site, what site was it (Please check all that apply)
_____ Facebook
_____ Instagram
_____ Twitter
_____ Myspace
_____ SnapChat
_____ Vine
_____ Tumbler
_____ Other: please describe
_____ I have never been cyberbullied
26. If you were cyberbullied on a social networking site, was it done publicly for everyone to see (ex:
posting something to someone’s Facebook site) or privately (ex: through a private message)?
Public Private Not Applicable Both: please explain
27. If you were the victim of cyberbullying, what was the reason someone did this to you? (If you
have never been a victim of cyberbullying, please select decline to answer)
_____________________________________________________________________________
28. What do you think the motive was for someone to cyberbully you? (Please check all that apply):
____ Jealousy
____ Anger
____ Revenge
____ Just to be mean/hurtful
____ To embarrass you
____ Other: Please describe:
____ I have never been cyberbullied.
IMPACT/COPING
29. If you were the victim of cyberbullying on a social networking site, how did it impact you? (If
you have never been a victim of cyberbullying, please select decline to answer)
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
30. If you were a victim of cyberbullying on a social networking site, did you do any of the following
things as a result of being cyberbullied? (Please select all that apply)
____ Avoid friends/peers
____ Tell someone what was happening (friends, family, trusted adult, etc.)
____ Miss class
____ Stop going to activities you once attended
____ Lose interest in things
____ Grades dropped in school

____ Acted out behaviors (e.g. stealing, truancy, substance use, etc.)
____ Drop-out of school
____ Drink alcohol/use illegal drugs
____ Get revenge
____ Consciously avoid the Internet/cell phones
____ Carry a weapon or something to defend yourself
31. If you were a victim of cyberbullying on a social networking site, how did you cope with the
experience? (If you have never been a victim of cyberbullying, please select decline to answer)
______________________________________________________________________________
32. If you were a victim of cyberbullying on a social networking site, did you do any of the following
things to cope? (Please select all that apply):
____ Talk about the experience with a friend
____ Talk about the experience with a parent or trusted adult
____ Ignore it
____ Stay off the Internet and/or your cell phone
____ Remove personal information from certain websites (particularly social networking sites)
____ Blocked certain people from contacting you on the Internet and/or your cell phone
____ Confront the person doing it
____ Ask the person doing it to stop
____ Sent mean, harassing, or embarrassing information back
____ Use physical force to convince the person to stop (beat them up)
____ Contact the police
____ Contact your service provider
____ Change your phone number, email address, or other identifying information
33. If you were a victim of cyberbullying on a social networking site, how did you get the harassment
to stop? Please describe: (If you have never been a victim of cyberbullying, please select decline to
answer.) ______________________________________________________________________
34. If you were a victim of cyberbullying on a social networking site, how have you been impacted?
(If you have never been a victim of cyberbullying, please select decline to answer.)
a. I felt sad or hurt
1-Never 2-Once/twice 3-A few times 4-Many times 5-Almost every day
b. I felt angry
c. I felt embarrassed
d. I felt afraid
e. I felt anxious
f. I felt helpless and/or hopeless
g. I felt frustrated
h. I was stressed
f. I missed school because of it
g. I cried
h. I had difficulty concentrating
i. My grades have dropped because of it
j. I became jumpy or irritable
k. I thought about the online harassment almost constantly
i. I stopped doing activities I once enjoyed
j. I acted out
k. I blamed myself
l. I felt lonely
m. I felt depressed
n. I felt ashamed
o. I had thoughts of suicide
1-No 2-Yes, without a plan 3-Yes, with a plan 4-Yes, with an attempt

Cyberbullying - Impacting Today - S Youth

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Cyberbullying - Impacting Today - S Youth

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Cyberbullying - Impacting Today - S Youth

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

St.

Master of Social Work Clinical Research Papers School of Social Work

Cyberbullying: Impacting Today’s Youth

Cyberbullying: Impacting Today’s Youth

Hillary Noll, B.A.

MSW Clinical Research Paper

Presented to the Faculty of the

Master of Social Work

Cyberbullying is becoming a major concern surrounding the adolescent population because of

students who were victimized by cyberbullying experienced negative emotional impacts

study were consistent with pre-existing literature.

Without you three this would not have been possible.

remain positive throughout.

use in my research and in the field of social work.

bullying. Cyberbullying is a form of bullying that occurs through electronic technology

(Patton et al., 2014).

safe in their home, school, or at extracurricular activities. According to the US Department of

having truancy issues and wanting to drop out of school.

discussion of the findings and suggestions for future research is discussed.

Social Networking Sites

many others (Sengupta & Chaudhuri 2011).

have a profile than a teenage male (Sengupta & Chaudhuri, 2011).

Cyberbullying on the Internet

Cyberbullying is the act of bullying in cyberspace by spreading rumors, making threats,

cyberbully victims (Schenk, 2011).

victimized by cyberbullying (Schneider, O’Donnell, Stueve, & Coulter, 2012).

bullied it shows that cyberbullying is an even bigger issue.

while doing so (Dehue, Bolman & Vollink, 2008).

by cyberbullying will continue to increase.

Teens Who Cyberbully

emotions that others feel.

Cyberbully-victim. A Cyberbully-victim is someone who reports at least one incident

cyberbullies (5%) (Pettalia, Levin & Dickinson, 2013).

Teens Who Are Victimized

cyberbully victimization and suicidal ideation and attempts.

Gender Differences. The current literature looking at gender differences among

adolescents victimized by cyberbullying.

(Dehue, Bolman, & Vollink, 2008; Walrave & Heriman, 2011).

impacts between genders (Pettalia, Levin & Dickinson, 2013).

adolescents who have been victimized.

students who have been victims of cyberbullying on social networking sites?

The ecological framework is the idea that a person’s development is affected by

everything in their changing environment throughout their lifespan (Bronfenbrenner, 1977).

questions to add depth.

excluding any current experiences.

mixture of freshman, sophomores, juniors, and seniors.

Protection of Human Subjects

To ensure confidentiality, there was no identifying demographic questions asked. There

feature allowed no identifying information, such as email addresses, to be collected.

Anger, Revenge, etc.). See appendix C.

The survey included questions regarding demographics, general cyberbullying questions,

on college-aged participants and this study is retrospective, asking college-aged participants to

behavioral impact score.

counted the number of times those themes appeared.

impact reported by respondents who were victimized on social networking sites.

behavioral impact scores.

their behavioral impact score.

cyberbullying on suicidal thoughts.