Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 74 views

    Lab Report 1

    Uploaded by

    AhmadAliAKbarPhambra
    This document describes an experiment using a Wheatstone bridge circuit to measure strain values on a cantilever beam under different load cases. Strain gages were attached to the beam and connected to the Wheatstone bridge to measure microstrain. Theoretical and experimental strain values were calculated and compared, finding errors generally under 20%. The results show the Wheatstone bridge can precisely measure small strain values, though compression readings had larger errors possibly due to misalignment of gages. The experiment effectively demonstrated the use of a Wheatstone bridge for strain measurement.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Lab Report 1

    Uploaded by

    AhmadAliAKbarPhambra
    74 views6 pages
    This document describes an experiment using a Wheatstone bridge circuit to measure strain values on a cantilever beam under different load cases. Strain gages were attached to the beam and connected to the Wheatstone bridge to measure microstrain. Theoretical and experimental strain values were calculated and compared, finding errors generally under 20%. The results show the Wheatstone bridge can precisely measure small strain values, though compression readings had larger errors possibly due to misalignment of gages. The experiment effectively demonstrated the use of a Wheatstone bridge for strain measurement.

    Original Description:

    Lab

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document describes an experiment using a Wheatstone bridge circuit to measure strain values on a cantilever beam under different load cases. Strain gages were attached to the beam and connected to the Wheatstone bridge to measure microstrain. Theoretical and experimental strain values were calculated and compared, finding errors generally under 20%. The results show the Wheatstone bridge can precisely measure small strain values, though compression readings had larger errors possibly due to misalignment of gages. The experiment effectively demonstrated the use of a Wheatstone bridge for strain measurement.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    74 views6 pages

    Lab Report 1

    Uploaded by

    AhmadAliAKbarPhambra
    This document describes an experiment using a Wheatstone bridge circuit to measure strain values on a cantilever beam under different load cases. Strain gages were attached to the beam and connected to the Wheatstone bridge to measure microstrain. Theoretical and experimental strain values were calculated and compared, finding errors generally under 20%. The results show the Wheatstone bridge can precisely measure small strain values, though compression readings had larger errors possibly due to misalignment of gages. The experiment effectively demonstrated the use of a Wheatstone bridge for strain measurement.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 6

    1.

    Title Information:

    Name
    CIV E #302
    Lab #2: Wheatstone bridge for Strain Measurement
    Date of Activity: Tuesday, February 5, 2019 (or Thurs. the 7th)
    Due date: Tuesday, February 19, 2018 (or Thurs. the 21st)

    2. Purpose:

    The purpose of this experiment is to satisfy the student outcome 3 of the


    course which focuses on analyzing and interpreting data to draw conclusions.
    In this experiment we have used Wheatstone bridge to measure strains using
    strain gages and output of B.L.H strain indicator which is strain values is
    interpreted to calculate the actual strains at the gage stations. Strain recorder
    box are used to make measurements of loads on the beam.
    Strain gage is basically a wire and its resistance is known at different strains
    including at zero value. So at different resistance values there is different
    strains. Voltage across the circuit is provided using the battery and current
    flow through circuit is governed by Ohm’s Law i.e. (V=IR). In order to make
    sure constant strain and hence the resistance within the strain gage it is glued
    to the member. This experiment also satisfies the outcome 4 because it uses
    the two different areas of civil engineering in this experiment. Using basics of
    mechanics of materials we draw Shear and moment diagrams to determine
    shear force and bending moment values like we do in a beam.

    3. Equipment and materials:

    Using jumper wires and color coded resistors Wheatstone bridge is set up on
    breadboard. Colors of the resistors have their own importance because these
    colors represents or tell us about the values of the resistances and different
    color combinations gives different resultant resistances.

     Loads
     Cantilever Beam
     Strain Gages
     Strain Recorder Box (B.L.H Strain indicator)
    Figure 1: B.L.H. Strain Indicator (Credits: Abdullah) Figure 2: Cantilever Beam

    .
    Figure 3:- Wheatstone Bridge circuit (Credits:Abdullah)

    4. Procedure:

    To build or to assemble the breadboard resistors and jumper wires were used.
    Wheatstone bridge circuit is shown in the figure 3 below. First of all, B.L.H
    Strain indicator box was turned on and switched the bridge selector to two
    arms and plugged in the 120 ohms, gage factor 2.08 dummy gage on branch 4
    of the Wheatstone bridge. Then we plugged in the tension strain gage on
    branch 3 of the Wheatstone bridge and strain measurement wheel to center the
    needle. And we recorded the reading from the strain indicator window. This is
    the DATUM.
    We placed the load onto the beam and centered the needle of the balancing
    meter, record the reading and repeat the steps for the compression gage. This
    is the reading WITH LOAD.
    Three load cases are shown below:

    Load Case 1: Load Case 2:

    Load Case 3:

    5. Data:

    Case 1: Point Load at 20”:


    Theoretical Strain: 182.07 µ in/in

    Tension:
    Datum=3106 µ in/in
    With Load=3310 µ in/in
    Strain=-204 µ in/in
    Compression:
    Datum=3820 µ in/in
    With Load=3605 µ in/in
    Strain=215 µ in/in
    Case 2: Distributed Load:
    Theoretical Strain: 39.415 µ in/in

    Tension:
    Datum= 3270 µ in/in
    With Load=3298 µ in/in
    Strain=-28 µ in/in
    Compression:
    Datum= 3815 µ in/in
    With Load=3710 µ in/in
    Strain=105 µ in/in
    Case 3: Point Load and distributed load:
    Theoretical Strain: 221.48 µ in/in

    Tension:
    Datum=3240 µ in/in
    With Load=3500 µ in/in
    Strain=-260 µ in/in
    Compression:
    Datum=3764 µ in/in
    With Load=3530 µ in/in
    Strain=234 µ in/in

    6. Required Calculation:

    Theoretical % %
    Compressiv Difference Differnces
    Strain
    Load/ Tensile Compressiv Tensile e s in in
    Load Case No Readings e Readings Strain Strain
    (μin/in)
    Tensile Compressiv
    Load (μin/in) (μin/in) (μin/in) (μin/in) Strains e Strains

    Point Load No 3106 3820 -204 215 182.07 12 18

    Yes 3310 3605

    Distributed No 3270 3815 -28 105 39.415 29 166


    Load
    Yes 3298 3710

    Combined No 3240 3764 -260 234 221.48 17 6


    Load
    Yes 3500 3350
    7. Required Discussion :

    After having calculated all the results both theoretical and experimental we
    come to the conclusion that in Wheatstone bridge circuit resistance is inversely
    proportional to the current flowing through it.It means as the resultant
    resistance increases across the circuit the current flowing through the circuit
    decreases. Wheatstone bridge and Strain recorder is very sensitive to small
    changes in the strains and hence can record very small values of the strains
    precisely.

    Comparing theoretical and experimental results we see that there are errors in
    the values of strain for both tension and compression regions. As you can see
    in Table above, some of the percent errors are high and some are low. The
    highest is for load case 2 compressive strain which is around 166% and is
    anomalous and the lowest is for the compressive strain for load case 3.

    This might have occurred due to non-uniform weight distribution of the load
    on the beam or may be due to touching of the wire while performing
    experiment. This percentage error must be removed and can be done by
    repeating the experiment multiple times unless percentage error comes under
    20%.

    It is also observable that there are more % errors in the compression readings
    than the tensile readings and this may have occurred because strain gage
    might not have been aligned underneath each other. And it can be concluded
    that experiment is good fit for the tensile regions as opposed to compressive
    region.

    The main difference between a half bridge and full bridge is the number of
    strain gages. The full bridge has 4 while the half bridge has 2. When possible,
    full bridge should be used since it has more strain gages, which makes it
    sensitive and more efficient. However, the half bridge is easier to set up as
    opposed to the full bridge circuit.

    8. References:

    Dowell, R.K. and Johnson, T. 2013. CIV E 302 Lab Manual.


    San Diego: San Diego State University

    Hibbeler, Russell C. 2017. Mechanics of Materials 10 th Ed. Boston: Pearson


    Education, Inc.
    A. Schraff, P.E., personal communication, February 5, 2019

    You might also like