HHS Public Access

Author manuscript
Cleve Clin J Med. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2016 May 12.
Author Manuscript

Published in final edited form as:

Cleve Clin J Med. 2013 October ; 80(10): 638–644. doi:10.3949/ccjm.80a.13039.

The jugular venous pressure revisited

JOHN MICHAEL S. CHUA CHIACO, MD,
Cardiovascular Disease, John A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawaii, Honolulu

NISHA I. PARIKH, MD, MPH [Assistant Professor], and

John A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawaii; The Queen’s Medical Center, Honolulu

DAVID J. FERGUSSON, MD [Clinical Professor of Medicine]

Author Manuscript

Department of Cardiology, John A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawaii; The Queen’s
Medical Center, Honolulu

Abstract
Assessment of the jugular venous pressure is often inadequately performed and undervalued. Here,
we review the physiologic and anatomic basis for the jugular venous pressure, including the
discrepancy between right atrial and central venous pressures. We also describe the correct method
of evaluating this clinical finding and review the clinical relevance of the jugular venous pressure,
especially its value in assessing the severity and response to treatment of congestive heart failure.
Waveforms reflective of specific conditions are also discussed.

In this age of technological marvels, it is easy to become so reliant on them as to neglect the
Author Manuscript

value of bedside physical signs. Yet these signs provide information that adds no cost, is
immediately available, and can be repeated at will.

Few physical findings are as useful but as undervalued as is the estimation of the jugular
venous pressure. Unfortunately, many practitioners at many levels of seniority and
experience do not measure it correctly, leading to a vicious circle of unreliable information,
lack of confidence, and underuse. Another reason for its underuse is that the jugular venous
pressure does not correlate precisely with the right atrial pressure, as we will see below.

In this review, we will attempt to clarify physiologic principles and describe technical
details. Much of this is simple but, as always, the devil is in the details.
Author Manuscript

ANATOMIC CONSIDERATIONS
Think of the systemic veins as a soft-walled and mildly distensible reservoir with finger-like
projections, analogous to a partially fluid-filled surgical glove.1 In a semi-upright position,
the venous system is partially filled with blood and is collapsed above the level that this
blood reaches up to.

ADDRESS: David John Fergusson, MD, 550 South Beretania Street, Unit 601, Honolulu, HI 96813; [email protected].
 CHIACO et al. Page 2

Blood is constantly flowing in and out of this reservoir, flowing in by venous return and
Author Manuscript

flowing out by the pumping action of the right side of the heart. The volume in the venous
reservoir and hence the pressure are normally maintained by the variability of right
ventricular stroke volume in accordance with the Frank-Starling law. Excess volume and
pressure indicate failure of this homeostatic mechanism.

The internal jugular veins, being continuous with the superior vena cava, provide a visible
measure of the degree to which the systemic venous reservoir is filled, a manometer that
reflects the pressure in the right atrium—at least in theory.2 Thus, the vertical height above
the right atrium to which they are distended and above which they are in a collapsed state
should reflect the right atrial pressure.

(In fact, the jugular venous pressure may underestimate the right atrial pressure, for reasons
still not understood. This will be discussed below.)
Author Manuscript

In a healthy person, the visible jugular veins are fully collapsed when the person is standing
and are often distended to a variable degree when the person is supine. Selecting an
appropriate intermediate position permits the top of the column (the meniscus) to become
visible in the neck between the clavicle and the mandible.

DISCREPANCY BETWEEN JUGULAR VENOUS AND RIGHT ATRIAL

PRESSURE
Several reports have indicated that the jugular venous pressure may underestimate the right
atrial pressure. Deol et al3 confirmed this, while establishing an excellent correlation
between the level of venous collapse (observed on ultrasonography) and the jugular venous
Author Manuscript

pressure. The difference between the right atrial pressure and the jugular venous pressure
tended to be greater at higher venous pressures.3

Most people have a valve near the termination of the internal jugular vein, with variable
competence. Inhibition of reflux of blood from the superior vena cava into the internal
jugular vein by this valve is the most plausible cause of this disparity.4

The failure of the jugular venous pressure to correlate with the right atrial pressure has been
cited by some as a reason to doubt the value of a sign that cardiologists have long relied on.
How do we reconcile this apparent paradox? Careful review of the literature that has
demonstrated this lack of correlation reveals the following:

• When unequal, the jugular venous pressure always underestimates the right atrial
pressure.
Author Manuscript

• The lack of correlation is less evident at lower venous pressures.

This indicates the following:

• In the presence of congestive heart failure, the right atrial pressure is at least as high
and perhaps higher than the jugular venous pressure. Hence, if the jugular venous
pressure is high, further treatment, especially diuresis, is needed.

Cleve Clin J Med. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2016 May 12.
 CHIACO et al. Page 3

• A jugular venous pressure of zero implies a euvolemic state.

Author Manuscript

Thus, the jugular venous pressure provides excellent guidance when administering diuresis
in congestive heart failure. These deductions obviously require the clinical judgment that the
elevated right atrial pressure and jugular venous pressure do indeed reflect elevation of
pulmonary capillary wedge pressure rather than other conditions discussed later in this
article.

WHICH REFERENCE POINT TO USE?

The two points that can be used as references above which the jugular venous pressure is
expressed are the center of the right atrium and the sternal angle. While the former may
reflect physiology, the latter is preferred, as it is always visible and has the added advantage
of being close to the upper limit of normal, which is about 3 cm above this level.
Author Manuscript

The difference in height between these two reference points has often been quoted as 5 cm,
but this is an underestimate in the body positions used in examination.5 Seth et al6 found a
mean of 8 cm at 30° elevation, 9.7 cm at 45°, and 9.8 cm at 60°. The difference also varied
between patients, being larger in association with smoking, older age, large body mass
index, and large anterior-posterior diameter. These factors should be considered when trying
to evaluate the significance of a particular jugular venous pressure.

The junction of the midaxillary line and the fourth left intercostal space (“the phlebostatic
point”) has been recommended as a reference point by some, as it is level with the mid-right
atrium. However, using the phlebostatic point as a reference position is cumber-some and
results in a valid measurement only with the patient in the supine position.7
Author Manuscript

TECHNIQUE IS VITAL
Close adherence to technical details is vital in reliably and reproducibly measuring the
pressure in the internal jugular veins (FIGURE 1).

The right side is usually observed first, as it is the side on which the examiner usually stands.
Using the right side also avoids the rare occurrence of external compression of the left
brachiocephalic vein.

Head and shoulders

The sternocleidomastoid muscle lies anterior to each internal jugular vein.8 When tense, it
impedes good observation. Shortening, and hence relaxing, this muscle permits the meniscus
to be observed. Correct positioning is achieved by:
Author Manuscript

• Placing a folded pillow behind the patient’s head

• Keeping the shoulders on the mattress

• Turning the head away and elevating the jaw, both slightly; this is often best
achieved by gentle pressure of the palm of the observer’s hand on the patient’s
forehead.

Cleve Clin J Med. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2016 May 12.
 CHIACO et al. Page 4

Degree of head elevation

Author Manuscript

Although the proper degree of head elevation is sometimes said to be between 30° and 60°,
these numbers are approximate. The correct angle is that which brings the venous meniscus
into the window of visibility in the neck between the clavicle and mandible.

Lighting
Shining a flashlight tangentially to the skin is often helpful, casting shadows that improve
the visibility of vein motion. Dimming the room lighting may further enhance this effect.
Directing a light perpendicular to the skin is not helpful.

Also check the external jugular vein

Checking the external jugular vein can help establish that the jugular venous pressure is
normal. If the vein is initially collapsed, light finger pressure at the base of the neck will
Author Manuscript

distend it. If the distention rapidly clears after release of this pressure, the jugular venous
pressure is not elevated. However, if external jugular venous distention persists, this does not
prove true jugular venous pressure elevation, since it may reflect external compression of the
vein by the cervical fascia or delayed blood flow caused by sclerotic venous valves.9 In these
instances, the internal jugular pulsation level must be sought.

Jugular venous collapse with inspiration

Collapse of the inferior vena cava with forced inspiration is routinely evaluated during
echocardiography as a way to estimate right atrial pressure. This finding has been
extrapolated to the jugular veins, wherein the absence of venous collapse during vigorous
inspiration or sniffing indicates elevated central venous pressures.10
Author Manuscript

Distinguishing venous from arterial pulsation

Features indicating venous rather than arterial pulsation were listed by Wood more than 50
years ago11 and are still relevant today. These include internal jugular pulsation that:

• Is soft, diffuse, undulant

• Is not palpable

• Has two crests and two troughs per cardiac cycle

• Has crests that do not coincide with the palpated carotid pulse (exceptions may be
seen with the systolic timing of the v wave of tricuspid regurgitation)

• Has higher pressure in expiration, lower in inspiration (exceptions may be seen

when Kussmaul physiology is present)
Author Manuscript

• Has pressure that rises with abdominal pressure

• Is obliterated by light pressure at the base of the neck.

In addition to the above criteria, a wave whose movement is predominantly a descent is

nearly always venous.

Cleve Clin J Med. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2016 May 12.
 CHIACO et al. Page 5

Abdominojugular reflex
Author Manuscript

Firm, steady pressure over the abdomen will often result in a small rise in jugular venous
pressure. In healthy people, this normalizes in a few seconds, even while manual pressure is
maintained. Persistence of jugular venous pressure elevation beyond 10 seconds, followed
by an abrupt fall upon withdrawal of manual pressure, is abnormal. This finding has
implications similar to those of an elevated baseline jugular venous pressure.

SIGNIFICANCE OF JUGULAR VENOUS PRESSURE ELEVATION

Elevated jugular venous pressure is a manifestation of abnormal right heart dynamics,
mostly commonly reflecting elevated pulmonary capillary wedge pressure from left heart
failure.12 This usually implies fluid overload, indicating the need for diuresis.

Exceptions to this therapeutic implication include the presence of a primary right heart
Author Manuscript

condition, pericardial disease, certain arrhythmias, and conditions that elevate intrathoracic
pressure. These will be discussed below. One important example is the acute jugular venous
pressure elevation seen in right ventricular infarction, in which the high venous pressure is
compensatory and its reduction can produce hypotension and shock.13

Primary right heart conditions also include right-sided valvular disease, cor pulmonale
(including pulmonary embolism and pulmonary hypertension), and the compressive effect of
pericardial tamponade or constriction. A normal or near-normal jugular venous pressure
significantly decreases the likelihood of significant constriction or of tamponade of a degree
necessitating urgent pericardiocentesis.14

SPECIAL CIRCUMSTANCES
Author Manuscript

Presence of an intravenous line in the neck

An intravenous line in the neck will often prevent observation of the jugular venous
pressure. A simple measure can often compensate for this. If the venous line can be
temporarily disconnected, the central venous pressure can be measured directly. Using
sterile technique, the line can be flushed with saline and aspirated to bring blood into the
transparent tubing. Leaving the proximal end open to the air, and alternately raising and
lowering it to confirm free flow, the level to which the blood rises can be easily observed.
Observing small cardiac and respiratory variations of the meniscus confirms free
communication with the central veins. Attaching the line to a transducer is another option,
but this may be time-consuming, and establishing an accurate zero point is often difficult.

The previously described discrepancy between jugular venous pressure and central venous
Author Manuscript

pressure has to be considered when drawing conclusions from this measurement.

Intrathoracic pressure elevators

Positive pressure ventilation will elevate intrathoracic pressure (including right atrial
pressure) and hence the jugular venous pressure, making interpretation difficult.15 Large
pleural effusions or pneumothorax may have a similar effect.16

Cleve Clin J Med. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2016 May 12.
 CHIACO et al. Page 6

Superior vena cava syndrome

Author Manuscript

Markedly elevated jugular venous pressure is here associated with absent or very diminished
pulsation, as the caval obstruction has eliminated free communication with the right
atrium.17 Associated facial plethora and edema, papilledema, and superficial venous
distention over the chest wall will often confirm this diagnosis.

THE WAVEFORM
While the main purpose of viewing the neck veins is to establish the mean pressure, useful
information can often be obtained by assessing the waveform. Abnormalities reflect
arrhythmias, right heart hemodynamics, or pericardial disease.18 Changes may be subtle and
difficult to detect, but some patterns can be quite readily appreciated (FIGURE 2). A limited
selection follows.
Author Manuscript

Arrhythmias
Cannon a waves—These intermittent sharp positive deflections in the venous pulse
represent right atrial contraction against a closed tricuspid valve. They are most commonly
associated with premature ventricular complexes, but they occur in other conditions in which
atrial and ventricular beating are dissociated, including complete heart block,
atrioventricular dissociation, and electronic ventricular pacing.19–21

Repetitive cannon waves—These may be seen with atrioventricular junctional

tachycardia or ventricular tachycardia with 1:1 retrograde ventriculoatrial conduction in
which the tricuspid valve is closed to every atrial beat.

Fine rapid regular pulsation may be seen in atrial flutter and may be a useful clue in
Author Manuscript

distinguishing this from sinus rhythm when there is 4:1 atrioventricular conduction and a
normal ventricular rate.

Abnormal right heart hemodynamics

Large v waves (Lancisi sign)—These surges, replacing the usual x descent in systole,
are seen in tricuspid insufficiency when the right atrium and its venous attachments are not
protected from the right ventricular systolic pressure.22 High right ventricular pressure will
obviously enhance this systolic surge.

Large a waves—These reflect resistance to right atrial outflow and may be seen when
right ventricular compliance is reduced by hypertrophy from chronic pressure overload or in
tricuspid stenosis.23
Author Manuscript

Pericardial disease
Kussmaul sign is the paradoxical increase in jugular venous pressure with inspiration,
observed in conditions associated with limited filling of the right ventricle. It is typically
associated with constrictive pericarditis, although it occurs in only a minority of people with
this condition.24 It may also be seen in restrictive cardiomyopathy, massive pulmonary
embolism, right ventricular infarction, and tricuspid stenosis.25

Cleve Clin J Med. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2016 May 12.
 CHIACO et al. Page 7

Diaphragmatic descent during inspiration increases intra-abdominal pressure and decreases

Author Manuscript

intrathoracic pressure. The resulting increased gradient between the abdomen and thorax
enhances venous return from splanchnic vessels, which in the setting of a noncompliant right
ventricle may result in increased right atrial (and, hence, jugular venous) pressure.26

It is important to point out that the Kussmaul sign does not occur with cardiac tamponade in
the absence of associated pericardial constriction.

Exaggerated y descent is typically seen in pericardial constriction, in which the high

pressure of the v wave falls rapidly at the onset of diastole, given initial minimal right
ventricular resistance. Flow is abruptly stopped when the intrapericardial space is filled.

REFERENCES
Author Manuscript

1. Sherwood, L. Human Physiology: From Cells to Systems. 8th ed.. Brooks/Cole; Belmont, CA:
2012.
2. Constant J. Using internal jugular pulsations as a manometer for right atrial pressure measurements.
Cardiology. 2000; 93:26–30. [PubMed: 10894903]
3. Deol GR, Collett N, Ashby A, Schmidt GA. Ultrasound accurately reflects the jugular venous
examination but underestimates central venous pressure. Chest. 2011; 139:95–100. [PubMed:
20798190]
4. Wu X, Studer W, Erb T, Skarvan K, Seeberger MD. Competence of the internal jugular vein valve is
damaged by cannulation and catheterization of the internal jugular vein. Anesthesiology. 2000;
93:319–324. [PubMed: 10910476]
5. Ramana RK, Sanagala T, Lichtenberg R. A new angle on the angle of Louis. Congest Heart Fail.
2006; 12:196–199. [PubMed: 16894277]
6. Seth R, Magner P, Matzinger F, van Walraven C. How far is the sternal angle from the mid-right
atrium? J Gen Intern Med. 2002; 17:852–856. [PubMed: 12406357]
7. Kee LL, Simonson JS, Stotts NA, Skov P, Schiller NB. Echocardiographic determination of valid
Author Manuscript

zero reference levels in supine and lateral positions. Am J Crit Care. 1993; 2:72–80. [PubMed:
8353583]
8. Park SY, Kim MJ, Kim MG, et al. Changes in the relationship between the right internal jugular vein
and an anatomical landmark after head rotation. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2011; 61:107–111. [PubMed:
21927678]
9. Sankoff J, Zidulka A. Non-invasive method for the rapid assessment of central venous pressure:
description and validation by a single examiner. West J Emerg Med. 2008; 9:201–205. [PubMed:
19561745]
10. Conn RD, O’Keefe JH. Simplified evaluation of the jugular venous pressure: significance of
inspiratory collapse of jugular veins. Mo Med. 2012; 109:150–152. [PubMed: 22675798]
11. Wood, PH. Diseases of the Heart and Circulation. 2nd ed.. Lippincott; Philadelphia, PA: 1956.
12. Drazner MH, Brown RN, Kaiser PA, et al. Relationship of right- and left-sided filling pressures in
patients with advanced heart failure: a 14-year multi-institutional analysis. J Heart Lung
Transplant. 2012; 31:67–72. [PubMed: 22071240]
Author Manuscript

13. Clark G, Strauss HD, Roberts R. Dobutamine vs furosemide in the treatment of cardiac failure due
to right ventricular infarction. Chest. 1980; 77:220–223. [PubMed: 7353422]
14. Roy CL, Minor MA, Brookhart MA, Choudhry NK. Does this patient with a pericardial effusion
have cardiac tamponade? JAMA. 2007; 297:1810–1818. [PubMed: 17456823]
15. Zhou Q, Xiao W, An E, Zhou H, Yan M. Effects of four different positive airway pressures on right
internal jugular vein catheterisation. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2012; 29:223–228. [PubMed: 22228239]
16. Jolobe OM. Disproportionate elevation of jugular venous pressure in pleural effusion. Br J Hosp
Med (Lond). 2011; 72:582–585. [PubMed: 22041729]

Cleve Clin J Med. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2016 May 12.
 CHIACO et al. Page 8

17. Seo M, Shin WJ, Jun IG. Central venous catheter-related superior vena cava syndrome following
renal transplantation—a case report. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2012; 63:550–554. [PubMed:
Author Manuscript

23277818]
18. Applefeld, MM. The jugular venous pressure and pulse contour. In: Walker, HK.; Hall, WD.;
Hurst, JW., editors. Clinical Methods: The History, Physical, and Laboratory Examinations. 3rd
ed.. Butterworths; Boston, MA: 1990.
19. El Gamal MI, Van Gelder LM. Chronic ventricular pacing with ventriculo-atrial conduction versus
atrial pacing in three patients with symptomatic sinus bradycardia. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol.
1981; 4:100–105. [PubMed: 6171783]
20. Berman ND, Waxman MB. Cannon waves with A-V association. Am Heart J. 1976; 91:643–644.
[PubMed: 1266721]
21. Luisada AA, Singhal A, Kim K. The jugular and hepatic tracings in normal subjects and in
conduction defects. Acta Cardiol. 1983; 38:405–424. [PubMed: 6606920]
22. Miller MJ, McKay RG, Ferguson JJ, et al. Right atrial pressure-volume relationships in tricuspid
regurgitation. Circulation. 1986; 73:799–808. [PubMed: 3948376]
23. Wooley CF, Fontana ME, Kilman JW, Ryan JM. Tricuspid stenosis. Atrial systolic murmur,
Author Manuscript

tricuspid opening snap, and right atrial pressure pulse. Am J Med. 1985; 78:375–384. [PubMed:
3976700]
24. McGee, SR. Evidence-Based Physical Diagnosis. 3rd ed.. Elsevier/Saunders; Philadelphia, PA:
2012.
25. Mittal SR, Garg S, Lalgarhia M. Jugular venous pressure and pulse wave form in the diagnosis of
right ventricular infarction. Int J Cardiol. 1996; 53:253–256. [PubMed: 8793578]
26. Bilchick KC, Wise RA. Paradoxical physical findings described by Kussmaul: pulsus paradoxus
and Kussmaul’s sign. Lancet. 2002; 359:1940–1942. [PubMed: 12057571]
Author Manuscript
Author Manuscript

Cleve Clin J Med. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2016 May 12.
 CHIACO et al. Page 9

If the jugular venous pressure differs from the true right atrial pressure, the jugular
Author Manuscript

venous pressure is always the lower value.

The jugular venous pressure is useful to observe when diagnosing congestive heart failure
and when considering the need for or the adequacy of diuresis.

The jugular venous wave form is more difficult to observe than its elevation but can yield
useful information in the assessment of certain arrhythmias, right-heart conditions, and
pericardial disease.
Author Manuscript
Author Manuscript
Author Manuscript

Cleve Clin J Med. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2016 May 12.
 CHIACO et al. Page 10

The internal jugular veins act as a manometer, reflecting the pressure in the right atrium
Author Manuscript

—with a notable qualification

Pressure in the internal jugular veins may underestimate, but will not overestimate, the
pressure in the right atrium

Close adherence to technical details is vital in measuring the pressure in the internal
jugular veins
Author Manuscript
Author Manuscript
Author Manuscript

Cleve Clin J Med. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2016 May 12.
 CHIACO et al. Page 11
Author Manuscript
Author Manuscript
Author Manuscript

FIGURE 1.
Author Manuscript

Cleve Clin J Med. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2016 May 12.
 CHIACO et al. Page 12
Author Manuscript
Author Manuscript
Author Manuscript

FIGURE 2.
Author Manuscript

a Not drawn to scale, but intended to illustrate the mechanisms involved.

b Produces occasional giant a waves.
c Not a true a wave, but fine oscillations of the waveform.

AS = atrial systole; ECG = electrocardiography; VS = ventricular systole

Cleve Clin J Med. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2016 May 12.