Final Research Paper First Draft
Final Research Paper First Draft
Final Research Paper First Draft
by
WEINBERG, DAVID
Abstract
ENZYME REACTION OPTIMIZATION FOR HYDROLYSIS 3
Table of Contents
Chapter 1: Introduction……………………………………………………………………………..
Statement of the Problem…………………………………………………………………...
Purpose of the Study………………………………………………………………………..
Research Questions…………………………………………………………………………
Hypothesis Statement……………………………………………………………………….
Significance of the Study…………………………………………………………………...
Definition of Key Terms……………………………………………………………………
Summary……………………………………………………………………………………
Chapter 4: Findings…………………………………………………………………………………
Results………………………………………………………………………………………
Evaluation of Findings……………………………………………………………………...
Summary……………………………………………………………………………………
References…………………………………………………………………………………………..
Appendix A…………………………………………………………………………………………
ENZYME REACTION OPTIMIZATION FOR HYDROLYSIS 4
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
GUS Beta-Glucuronidase
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1
Table 2
Table 3
Table 4
Table 5
Table 6
ENZYME REACTION OPTIMIZATION FOR HYDROLYSIS 6
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
ENZYME REACTION OPTIMIZATION FOR HYDROLYSIS 7
Chapter 1: Introduction
The topic of this research paper is enzyme hydrolysis, specifically the reaction conditions
and reagents used to obtain the optimal reaction based on recovery of desired chemical
GUS, under sets of varied conditions. The goal of this experimentation is to obtain the highest
possible yield of desired product, free codeine, from the reaction. An expected value for yield
has been calculated based on chemical equivalencies between codeine-6-glucuronide and free
clinical laboratories, so the optimization of reactions is often paramount for accurate results and
clinical reporting.
combination of enzyme source, activity units, temperature and incubation time in sample
preparation by enzyme hydrolysis of codeine-6-glucuronide yields the most accurate results for
The purpose of this study is to optimize the sample preparation procedures for preparing urine
samples to be tested for drug metabolites. This optimization would be implemented at Newstar
What source of beta-glucuronidase, time of incubation, temperature, and enzyme activity units in
sample preparation afford the most accurate sample analysis by percent recovery of codeine
analytes?
An activity of 4,000 units, a time of 2 hours, a temperature of 55°C, and the E. coli-derived beta-
glucuronidase from manufacturer Kura Biotec will result in the most accurate analysis results.
conducted)
This study looks at what enzyme sources and sample preparation conditions yield the most
samples and attempts to optimize these factors. This study is of immediate relevance and
importance in the clinical laboratory industry. Laboratories must try to cut costs wherever
necessary to provide more cost-effective services while maintaining quality. Boison, Dowling,
Johnson, & Kinar (2016) showed that recovery of drug metabolites from horse tissue samples is
increased by the addition of a GUS hydrolysis step, so it has been shown to increase yield.
techniques can give laboratories an advantage. This is very useful in an expensive but essential
business like private healthcare. Without efficient methods, costs would be great and patients
would have to pay that difference. Thus, the importance of this study stems from its potential to
increase accuracy and efficiency of reporting and to drive down care costs. NEEDS EDITING
ENZYME REACTION OPTIMIZATION FOR HYDROLYSIS 9
SAME AS IN PROPOSAL?
substitution reactions. Base hydrolysis involves the hydroxyl (OH-) group of the
base acting as the substitution for something else in a reaction (S. Vander Wielen,
Jenkins, 1997).
(beta-Glucuronidase)”, n. d.).
Enzyme Activity Unit: The amount of an enzyme that catalyzes the conversion of
a specific amount of a substance per minute under optimal conditions for the
(NC-IUB), 1979).
bonds in molecules in the presence of water (Yang, Dai, Ding, & Wyman, 2011).
involving the breaking of bonds in the solute (McNaught, Wilkinson, & Jenkins,
1997).
ENZYME REACTION OPTIMIZATION FOR HYDROLYSIS 10
14, 2018).
a mixture are applied to a solid, or stationary phase, moved along that solid by a
liquid solution, or mobile phase, and separated from each by various interactions
between the individual molecules and the stationary phase (Coskun, 2016).
charge using electromagnetic fields, and detecting them and creating a graph
based on the results (Reusch, 2013). Tandem mass spectrometry uses multiple
Metabolite: “A substance made or used when the body breaks down food, drugs
assure the validity of results and to improve analysis associated with measurement
Summary
ENZYME REACTION OPTIMIZATION FOR HYDROLYSIS 11
ENZYME REACTION OPTIMIZATION FOR HYDROLYSIS 12
Contains several subheadings, start with introduction, logical structure with varied in-text
In order to understand the enzyme hydrolysis process that is essential for production in
many clinical laboratories, one should be knowledgeable about hydrolysis methods and enzyme
functions. In this case, a basic understanding of human metabolism is helpful too, considering
the research is being conducted to inform testing with human urine samples. This literature
review will discuss, as found in peer-reviewed scientific papers, hydrolysis techniques and some
advantages and disadvantages, as well as the function and sources of GUS in the context of
Logical structure, don’t summarize, synthesize, conclusion that answers questions, statement of
EDITS LATER
Hydrolysis involves the breaking of bonds with water. Two efficient hydrolysis methods
are acid/base hydrolysis and enzymatic or enzyme hydrolysis. These techniques of hydrolysis are
important in today’s world, both in science and in industry. Hydrolysis is used to create fuel
(Greenwood, Farrell, Zhang, & O'Hara, 2015) and other products and separate useful
compounds, including those to help fight disease, from other larger substances (Peciulyte,
Karlstrom, Larsson, & Olsson, 2015; Liu, Wen, Zhang, Wei, Deng, Xiao, & Zhang, 2017).
Generally, hydrolysis techniques are used because they are more efficient and provide greater
products yields than other methods of substance separation (Greenwood et al., 2015; Boison et
al., 2016; Liu et al., 2017). Much current research is being conducted to improve hydrolysis
ENZYME REACTION OPTIMIZATION FOR HYDROLYSIS 13
methods, both to expand their uses to larger scale operations and to optimize their efficiencies
(Greenwood et al., 2015). This section will cover some of the characteristics of acid/base
hydrolysis and enzyme hydrolysis and discuss their relative advantages and disadvantages.
Acid/base hydrolysis involves using acids or bases to catalyze hydrolysis and break
bonds. Acids and bases are somewhat interchangeable in this manner, as the better option
depends on the substance being hydrolyzed. Often this technique is used in large-scale hydrolysis
of tough biofuels and natural substances, especially plant matter (Greenwood et al., 2015; Liu et
al., 2017; Hilpmann et al., 2016). This type of hydrolysis characteristically requires severe
conditions for reactions to take place efficiently. Due to reaction kinetics, the most influential of
these conditions is temperature. In order for acid/base hydrolysis reactions to occur swiftly, high
temperatures are used, often times near or beyond 100°C (Hilpmann et al., 2016; Greenwood et
al, 2015). Yields often improve at these higher temperatures because of those reaction kinetics
(Greenwood et al., 2015). Another main condition affecting acid/base hydrolysis is, of course,
pH. Naturally, these reactions require extremely high or low pHs to proceed (Hilpmann et al.,
2016).
While these reaction conditions can be acceptable in large scale industrial production,
they can often lead to undesired consequences. Hydrolysis at these high temperatures and pHs
can drain resources and money (Greenwood et al., 2015). At temperatures and pHs that are too
high, degradation can occur, leading to the destruction of resources before they can be converted
to useful products. Alternatively, unwanted by-products can be formed in the same way. This can
cause reactions to occur efficiently in only a relatively small window of temperatures and pHs
(Hilpmann et al., 2016). As stated previously, these conditions are obtained and accepted in some
catalysts for bond breaking. Uses of enzyme hydrolysis are more exact, including drug analysis
(Boison et al., 2016), and require less severe conditions in order to maximize the activity of the
enzyme and reduce the possibility of degrading the target compounds and enzymes. Increasing
temperature helps increase the reaction rate, as in most cases, but enzymes usually cannot be
subjected to very high temperatures and remain effective due to degradation of the enzyme (Liu
et al., 2017; Hilpmann et al., 2016), although there are exceptions (Hilpmann et al., 2016).
Another characteristic of enzyme hydrolysis is that enzymes, by design, are very specific to
certain substances. Enzymes must be able to chemically bind to other substances, but the
physical structure of enzymes used for hydrolysis must also closely match the structures of the
substances that are hydrolyzed. Sometimes this principle is extended to structures surrounding
the target substances. Even within targets for hydrolysis, variations in structure and the
attachment site of enzymes can impact how effectively enzyme hydrolysis breaks up substances
One other possible method for hydrolysis is to treat substances with acids or bases prior
to enzyme hydrolysis. This could serve to be more efficient for some substances than either
technique used alone. What can occur in a lot of cases of both hydrolysis techniques being used
is that first treating a substance by acid or base hydrolysis allows enzymes to better access sites
or can prepare certain substances for enzyme hydrolysis that would not have been able to without
pretreatment under the severe conditions of acid/base hydrolysis (Peciulyte et al., 2015). This
As shown, both acid/base and enzymatic techniques of hydrolysis have their respective
benefits and situations where they are used. Acid/base hydrolysis is better for larger scale, more
industrial processes where conditions can be made as severe as possible to speed up reaction
rates. Enzyme hydrolysis is preferable for more precise methods as there is less possibility of
regulated. In the context of the research that will be performed in this study, enzyme hydrolysis
is used because the drug analytes that are studied are not stable under severe reaction conditions
and the instruments of analysis are very finely tuned and thus subject to degradation and damage
under those same conditions. Reaction conditions such as temperature and time of reaction will
be manipulated to determine the optimal hydrolysis activity of an enzyme. The specific enzyme
Before talking about the enzyme GUS, one has to discuss the functions and processes that
GUS is related to. In human metabolism, one of the main ways that humans excrete waste is
through urine. In order for waste to be excreted in urine, it has to be soluble in urine. Not all
waste products are soluble in urine, so the body has mechanisms to change the solubility of
certain waste products to make them more easily excretable. One of these is a process called
glucuronidation (Liang et al., 2016). Glucuronidation attaches a glucuronic acid – a type of sugar
– substituent to a waste product to make it soluble in urine. One of the main groups of waste
products that are affected by glucuronidation is drugs. Thus, it is very important to understand
glucuronidation as a part of drug metabolism when developing or prescribing drugs (Liang et al.,
In the same vein, being able to separate drugs and drug metabolites from their glucuronic
acid conjugates helps to facilitate drug analysis. GUS, the enzyme used for this research, has the
specific function of cleaving glucuronic acid groups, and sometimes other substrates, from waste
products, including drugs and drug metabolites, carcinogens, and hormones (Sakurama et al.,
2014). Now, other substances are hydrolyzed by GUS: it is used in the body in regular
metabolism to regulate the accumulation of non-harmful substances in the body (Hassan et al.,
2013) and on other substances not related to human metabolism in order to convert them from a
form containing glucuronic acid to another, more useful one without it (Sakurama et al., 2014).
Not every form of GUS – because GUS is actually a class of enzymes – has the same
capabilities. Sakurama et al. (2014) discovered a GUS that has “strict glycon specificity” (p. 7),
meaning that it selectively hydrolyzes only substances with a glucuronic acid group, as opposed
to others that have the capability of hydrolyzing other substrates. The use of GUS that is
implemented in this research is its ability to isolate drugs and drug metabolites from their
This is something that GUS excels at. GUS is used often in clinical laboratories in sample
preparation before drug analysis. The isolation of drugs and drug metabolites allows for clearer
recognition by machines of drug presence in human urine samples. Taylor et al. (2017)
mentioned that “an enzymatic hydrolysis step using ß-Glucuronidase may be implemented to
increase the sensitivity of [benzodiazepines]” (p. 2). Taylor et al.’s study was done with clinical
laboratory testing in mind. In fact, they showed an increase in positive screens for
benzodiazepines, a class of depressant drugs, of 42.5% with the addition of GUS in sample
preparation (Taylor et al., 2017). Much current research is occurring in optimization of sample
preparation using GUS in clinical laboratories, including this study. Morris et al. (2014) showed
ENZYME REACTION OPTIMIZATION FOR HYDROLYSIS 17
that a specific form of GUS can give the same amount of hydrolysis “at [room temperature]
equivalent to measurements at 55°C” and “was considerably faster” compared to another form
(p. 3). They also showed that this form was less damaging to instruments over time as many
samples were run through them. These different forms of GUS are another area of ongoing
GUS is harvested or manufactured from a variety of sources. Humans are one such
source (Hassan, Waheed, Grubb, Klei, Korolev, & Sly, 2013), although human GUS is not used
in clinical settings. Other sources are more easily harvestable, such as abalone (Morris et al.,
2014). Abalone-based GUS was used often in clinical laboratories, but other sources have
become more prominent recently. Bacterial GUS is even more easily acquired than abalone
GUS, so it has become more pervasive. The main source of GUS from bacteria is Escherichia
coli and other closely related bacteria; it was thought to be essentially the only bacterial source of
GUS (Krahulec, Szemes, & Krahulcová, 2010). However, Krahulec et al. (2010) discovered
another source of GUS in bacteria. Sakurama et al. (2014) continued this, finding other bacterial
sources, as did other groups, and still more sources of GUS are being sought out. In reality,
human GUS is very similar to bacterial GUS (Hassan et al., 2013), but obviously it is easier to
obtain GUS from bacteria than from humans. The desire for better sources of GUS has begun the
development of synthetic analogues to natural GUS. Manufacturers like IMCSzyme and Kura
Biotec have developed recombinant GUS, and research has begun on characterizing these
GUS is obviously an important enzyme because of its role in the laboratory. Since
glucuronidation and GUS to be able to monitor metabolism. Since healthcare, including drug
ENZYME REACTION OPTIMIZATION FOR HYDROLYSIS 18
testing in clinical laboratories, is so imperative and expensive, it is important as well to use the
right materials and to optimize resources and processes to provide efficient results and care at
low cost. This research uses GUS in sample preparation to hydrolyze codeine-6-glucuronide.
GUS source, time of incubation, temperature, and enzyme activity units are manipulated to
determine which combination of these factors leads to the most efficient and most accurate
Summary
ENZYME REACTION OPTIMIZATION FOR HYDROLYSIS 19
This chapter concerns the research process, including specific details on data collection
and analysis. Also covered will be samples for statistical purposes, materials and instruments, the
scope of the study, and any assumptions made concerning the research. The question the
researcher is trying to answer is: What source of GUS, time of incubation, temperature, and
enzyme activity units in sample preparation afford the most accurate sample analysis by percent
recovery of codeine analytes? The hypothesis formulated for this question is: An activity of
4,000 units, a time of 2 hours, a temperature of 55°C and the E. coli-derived GUS from
manufacturer Kura Biotec will result in the highest percent recovery. The aim of this chapter is
to ensure the replicability of the study for any future researchers that may take interest in this
area of study.
Accurately describes, substantiate appropriateness of the design, statement of why design was
chosen or was appropriate, explain how you were able to accomplish the study goals
The researcher conducted the data collection for this research at Newstar Medical
Laboratories, LLC. The results and methods of similar studies were reviewed in the literature
review to inform this study’s methodology. The researcher prepared samples to start with the
IMCSzyme E.coli-based GUS, beginning trials with activity, then temperature and time of
incubation. Then the researcher conducted trials with the Kura Biotec E.coli-based GUS. MORE
MORE MORE
ENZYME REACTION OPTIMIZATION FOR HYDROLYSIS 20
The researcher prepared the first set of samples with one source of GUS and manipulated
variables at between five and eight data points, depending on the condition variable. However,
the researcher only manipulated one variable at a time. For example, the researcher began with
the IMCSzyme GUS and manipulated activity units. In this case, activity units were changed as
incubation time and temperature were held constant at 1 hours and 55C. The same procedure was
followed for manipulating other condition variables. The researcher collected results for samples
with a single GUS source, and then work began on samples with a different source. This
separation ensured that inherently different activity levels for enzymes didn’t confound results
50 µL of synthetic urine, which simulates the actual chemical environment of human urine, due
to volume constraints. All other experimental reactions, however, occurred in 100 µL. The
the various combinations of factors. This method first separates analytes from each other and
then individually measures their masses so they can be identified. LC-MS/MS has been validated
many times as an analytical method and is taught in chemistry courses. The instruments used at
Newstar Medical Laboratories, a Shimadzu 20-Series LC setup and an AB Sciex API Triple-
Quad 4500 MS, are valid and reliable for clinical use (CITATIONS?). Analysis results obtained
from these instruments are sent to and displayed on a paired computer with software for
quantitative analysis, specifically MultiQuant 3.0.????, also from AB Sciex. Also used as part of
In analyzing each batch of samples to obtain quantitative results, the researcher prepared
a set of samples alongside experimental samples to prepare the instruments for analysis. Blanks,
samples containing only mobile phase, went first so that the mobile phase running through the
LC would equilibrate with the stationary phase. Calibrator samples injected into the instrument
next. These set up a calibration curve on the paired software that serves as the reference for
calibrators and have a known concentration of analyte. They are used in clinical practice to
verify that the calibration curve is accurate before any patient samples are run. After running
quality controls, the LC-MS/MS injected experimental samples for analysis. All experimental
equivalent to a known concentration of codeine. This served as the reference value against which
the researcher compared experimental samples. Each sample created contained internal
standards. These are solutions of analytes of a known concentration that are slightly modified to
distinguish them from target analytes. They serve to reduce the confounding of response results
from LC-MS/MS. By creating a ratio of responses between target analytes and internal
standards, one can protect against data skewing because of common instrument issues. Because
both the targets and internal standards are affected, no change is recorded in the response ratio.
Once the researcher obtained results for the experimental samples, the researcher
compared them with the expected concentrations of codeine in samples to determine the percent
recovery of analytes and thus the effectiveness of hydrolysis under experimental conditions. The
researcher recorded, tabulated, and illustrated these data graphically, when appropriate. To
quantify analysis results, the researcher used descriptive statistics, including mean, standard
deviation, and percent coefficient of variance. The industry standard of an acceptable difference
ENZYME REACTION OPTIMIZATION FOR HYDROLYSIS 22
in percent recovery from expected is plus or minus 20%. This standard allowed the researcher to
assess the viability of experimental conditions for sample analysis for actual urine samples. The
researcher then analyzed the results to determine which method for sample preparation yields
Population
Sample
Identify sampling method, explain selection of relevant sample, including known population
characteristics, Quantitative study: minimum sample size with sampling error considered,
representativeness, and assumptions of statistical tests, as appropriate describe how existing data
were originally collected and for what purpose, must be sufficient description for replicability
Materials/Instruments
Description of data sources (archived data, published instruments, materials, interview protocol,
apparatus), specific types of validity and reliability, include appendices as needed, materials
developed for the study, apparatus including make, mode, how it is used, outcomes it provides,
validity, reliability
Describe in enough detail for replication, describe steps taken to complete the study, provide
specific details related to the execution of the study, describe types of data and statistical
analysis/software, describe analysis strategy used to test hypotheses, must be appropriate for
statistical test
The data that the researcher will need to determine the optimal method of sample
preparation are percent recovery of codeine and percent difference from expected concentrations
of codeine. The researcher will obtain these values by entering experimental samples into an LC-
MS/MS for analysis. Software compatible with the LC-MS/MS will calculate and display results
for percent recovery, from which the researcher will calculate coefficient of variation as well.
Data obtained from LC-MS/MS will transfer to software on the laboratory’s computers for
further analysis and calculations, so the researcher will not have to compute percent recovery
manually. However, the researcher will need to compute the coefficient of variation among
triplicated samples. This will show the precision of the preparation method in hydrolyzing
manipulated variables plotted against percent recovery to show the impact of conditions on
enzyme efficiency. The researcher will determine the optimal method of sample preparation by
determining the closest percent recovery of codeine analytes to the expected value. He will also
factor in the coefficients of variation in weighing whether or not a particular average percent
recovery is reliable.
ENZYME REACTION OPTIMIZATION FOR HYDROLYSIS 24
Assumptions
Assumptions about population and design and rationale, support for assumptions
The researcher assumes that the instruments used for analysis are tuned and provide
The researcher assumes that they will have access to enough enzymes/supplies to prepare
The researcher assumes that the equipment used for sample preparation and analysis are
The researcher assumes that the enzymes obtained from manufacturers function as
The researcher assumes that the quality control samples from manufacturers provide
Limitations
Study limitations, potential weakness to interpretation and validity, context of design, how
A limitation of the study is in the “cleanliness” of the enzymes used. Different sources of
GUS yield different levels of “cleanliness” in the enzyme. E. coli sources are generally
considered the cleanest and abalone is less so. However, these factors and their impacts
A limitation of the study is in the time frame the researcher will have to collect data.
Because of time constraints, the researcher will not have time to investigate the effects of
longer incubation times on metabolite recovery results or any long-term cost benefits of
Delimitations
This study does not include any tests on enzymes that are not GUS. Within the confines
of laboratory where the research will be performed, GUS is the only enzyme available for
study.
This study does not perform any tests on variables that are not time of incubation, activity
units, or temperature. Tests on other variables, such as pH, are possible but not within the
This study obtains results for validation of preparation techniques from liquid
obtain the same or similar results, but the study will only be performed using instruments
Ethical Assurances
Compliance with standards for conducting research as appropriate to design, how assurances for
???????????
ENZYME REACTION OPTIMIZATION FOR HYDROLYSIS 26
Summary
Chapter 4: Findings
Brief overview of purpose, brief overview of the chapter, organize based on research
Results
Report results without discussion, in paragraph format, appropriate description, results presented
in logical fashion, answer questions as stated, address violations of assumptions, make decisions
based on results of statistical analysis (significance), APA to present results in text, tables,
figures, provide sufficient information for reader to make own judgement regarding
Evaluation of Findings
Briefly report what findings mean, interpret results in light of context, expected vs unexpected
and explanations for unexpected/conflicting results, brief interpretation within study context and
profession, originality of contribution, figures that explain should be right by the paragraph, cite
if not own creation, discuss findings in terms of practical utility, how profession/field of study
are impacted by inquiry, avoid drawing conclusions beyond what can be interpreted directly
from study results, data must be explained thoroughly, most important tables/graphs should be
right next to paragraphs explaining results, specific and concise, all other data in appendices
Summary
ENZYME REACTION OPTIMIZATION FOR HYDROLYSIS 28
Brief review of problem, purpose, method, limitations, ethics, conclude with brief overview of
the chapter
Implications
Each research question and hypothesis (when appropriate) individually, draw logical
All real world connections for practical applications, supported with findings, connections for
future research
The purpose in conducting this study is to optimize the enzyme hydrolysis of codeine-6-
analysis, and hydrolysis reactions are commonly used to convert compounds into more easily
analyzed forms. Codeine-6-glucuronide was chosen for this research because it is known for
being difficult to hydrolyze, even over other drugs in other classes (R. Godwin, personal
communication, October 9, 2018). Clinical laboratories that evaluate the presence of drugs and
drug metabolites in patient samples must ensure that sample preparation methods provide
adequate conversion of glucuronide conjugates to parent drugs, like codeine, in order to obtain
ENZYME REACTION OPTIMIZATION FOR HYDROLYSIS 29
adequate response from instruments to confirm or deny the presence of drugs. This research
serves to optimize the procedures for such preparation. Enzyme source, incubation time, enzyme
activity units, and temperature will be examined because they are influential and cost-inducing
factors in sample preparation (Morris, Chester, Strickland, & McIntire, 2014, pp. 1-2; Taylor,
Flint, Ma, Hill, Clark, & Strathmann, 2017, p. 2). Using beta-glucuronidase as the enzyme for
metabolites, which are pervasive in human metabolism (Hassan, Waheed, Grubb, Klei, Korolev,
& Sly, 2013, p. 1; Liang et al., 2015, pp. 2-3). The researcher undertook this research and the
internship where this research was performed in order to further their knowledge of the
laboratory industry and the field of analytical chemistry, and because it provided the opportunity
This study looks at what enzyme sources and sample preparation conditions yield the
most accurate results for analysis of drug metabolites in urine samples and attempts to optimize
these factors. This study is of immediate relevance and importance in the industry of clinical
laboratories. Laboratories must try to cut costs wherever necessary to provide more cost-
effective services while maintaining quality. Boison, Dowling, Johnson, & Kinar (2016) showed
that recovery of drug metabolites from horse tissue samples is increased by the addition of a
GUS hydrolysis step, so it has been shown to increase yield. However, optimization of that
hydrolysis is required, and any amount of optimization of techniques can give laboratories an
advantage. This is very useful in an expensive but lucrative business like private healthcare.
Thus, the importance of this study stems from its potential to increase accuracy and efficiency of
Recommendations
future research
Conclusions
References
CHECK FOR IN PAPER AND CONSISTENCY
https://doi.org/10.1351/goldbook.A00218.
Boison, J., Dowling, T., Johnson, R., & Kinar, J. (2016). Analysis of phenylbutazone residues in
horse tissues with and without enzyme hydrolysis by LC-MS/MS. Drug Testing and
Gagez, A.-L., Rouguieg-Malki, K., Sauvage, F.-L., Marquet, P., & Picard, N. (2012). Simultaneous
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ab.2012.04.031
https://www.sigmaaldrich.com/life-science/biochemicals/biochemical-
products.html?TablePage=15846734
Greenwood, A. A., Farrell, T. W., Zhang, Z., & O'Hara, I. M. (2015). A novel population balance
model for the dilute acid hydrolysis of hemicellulose. Biotechnology for Biofuels, 8(26), 1-
13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-015-0211-5
ENZYME REACTION OPTIMIZATION FOR HYDROLYSIS 32
Hassan, M. I., Waheed, A., Grubb, J. H., Klei, H. E., Korolev, S., & Sly, W. S. (2013). High
Hilpmann, G., Becher, N., Pahner, F.-A., Kusema, B., Mäki-Arvela, P., Lange, R., . . . Salmi, T.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2015.04.044
Howanitz, P. J., & Howanitz, J. H. (1983). Quality control for the clinical laboratory. Clinics in
https://doi.org/10.1351/goldbook.I03108.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1432-1033.1979.tb13116.x
Krahulec, J., Szemes, T., & Krahulcová, J. (2010). Bioinformatics characterization of potential new
Liang, S.-C., Xia, Y.-L., Hou, J., Ge, G.-B., Zhang, J.-W., He, Y.-Q., . . . Yang, L. (2016).
Liu, L., Wen, W., Zhang, R., Wei, Z., Deng, Y., Xiao, J., & Zhang, M. (2017). Complex enzyme
hydrolysis releases antioxidative phenolics from rice bran. Food Chemistry, 214, 1-8.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.07.038
Morris, A. A., Chester, S. A., Strickland, E. C., & McIntire, G. L. (2014). Rapid enzymatic
NCI dictionary of cancer of cancer terms: Metabolite. (n.d.). Retrieved September 16, 2018, from
terms/def/metabolite
Peciulyte, A., Karlstrom, K., Larsson, P. T., & Olsson, L. (2015). Impact of the supramolecular
https://www2.chemistry.msu.edu/faculty/reusch/virttxtjml/spectrpy/massspec/masspec1.htm
Sakurama, H., Kishino, S., Uchibori, Y., Yonejima, Y., Ashida, H., Kita, K., . . . Ogawa, J. (2014).
glycoside hydrolase family 30. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 98(9), 4021-4032.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-013-5325-8
Tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS). (2015, September 15). Retrieved from National High
facilities/icr/techniques/tandem-ms
ENZYME REACTION OPTIMIZATION FOR HYDROLYSIS 34
Taylor, L. L., Flint, N. A., Ma, V., Hill, B. M., Clark, C. J., & Strathmann, F. G. (2017). Internal
Yang, B., Dai, Z., Ding, S.-Y., & Wyman, C. E. (2011). Enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulosic biomass.
Appendix A: Title
Not needed for all papers, usually added for data/quotations too lengthy for inclusion in text, not
listed as chapters, divided by letters on separate pages, must meet margin guidelines, list each
appendix separately in Table of Contents, tables and figures must be numbered, captioned, and
listed in List of Tables or List of Figures, all material must be distinct, legible