Mech 14
Mech 14
Mech 14
Course by E. Kogan
E
F = −mω 2 (x − a4 /x3 ), (6)
x 3
2
θ l
τ/τs
m 1
y
FIG. 2: 0
0 1 2 3
θ0
For θ0 ≪ 1 we
√ obtain harmonic oscillations with the FIG. 3: Period of oscillations of a simple pendulum as a func-
frequency ω = l/g. For θ0 = 0 tion of an amplitude θ0 .
√ ∫
1 l dθ
t= . (8) Integrating term by term we get
2 g cos θ2
[ ( )2 ( )2 ]
π 1 1 · 3
The integral can be easily calculated K(k) = 1+ k2 + k4 + . . .
2 2 2·4
∫ ∫ (θ) ∫ ( )
dθ d 2 cos θ2 dx 1+x
=2 =2 = ln The first two terms of the expansion of the period with
cos θ2 cos2 θ2 1 − x2 1−x
( ) [ ( )]
respect to θ0 are
1 + sin θ2 π−θ √ (
= ln = 2 ln cot . (9) )
1 − sin 2
θ 4 ℓ 1 2
τ = 2π 1 + θ0 + · · · .
g 16
For arbitrary amplitude after substitution x =
sin θ2 / sin θ20 we obtain Eq. (7) in the form Problem B.1 Convince yourself that for θ0 → π the pe-
riod diverges ∝ − ln(π − θ0 ).
g
ẋ2 = (1 − x2 )(1 − k 2 x2 ),
l Problem B.2 ** The pendulum comprises a bob of mass
m supported by a light rigid rod of length l. Find the equa-
where k = sin(θ0 /2). For the period we obtain tion of motion for small displacements from the position
√ ∫ of unstable equilibrium. Show that if it is released from
ℓ 1 dx rest at a small angle to the upward vertical, then the time
τ =4 √ .
g 0 (1 − x2 )(1 − k 2 x2 ) taken for the angular displacement to increase by a factor
of 10 will be approximately (l/g)1/2 ln 20. Evaluate this
Making substitution ξ = sin x, we get time for a pendulum of length 1m, and find the angular
√ ∫ √ velocity of the pendulum when it reached the downward
ℓ π/2 dξ ℓ vertical.
τ =4 √ =4 K(k), (10)
g 0 1 − k sin ξ
2 2 g
II. CENTRAL FIELD
Integral in Eq. (10) is called the complete elliptic in-
tegral of the first kind - a well known special function.
A. Energy
We can present the integral (10) as a series with respect
to parameter k. Using the binomial series A particle is said to be in a force field (time dependent
in general case) if F = F(r, t). The force field is potential
α α(α − 1) 2 if we can introduce V (r, t), such that
(1 + x)α = 1 + x+ x + ...,
1! 2!
F = −∇V ⇐⇒ ∇ × F = 0.
we obtain
Well known examples:
1 1
√ = 1 + k 2 sin2 ξ
1 − k 2 sin ξ
2 2 1 2
F = −kr =⇒ V =kr
1·3 4 4 1·3·5 6 6 2
+ k sin ξ + k sin ξ + . . . . F = mg =⇒ V = −mg · r.
2·4 2·4·6
5
For time independent potential field from Eq. (1) we get B. Angular Momentum
the energy conservation law
T + V = E = const, From Eq. (1) we obtain
where J̇ = G.
m
T = ṙ2 (11) where
2
is the kinetic energy. In Cartesian coordinates Eq. (11) J = mr × ṙ; G=r×F (18)
is
m( 2 )
are the angular momentum and the momentum of force
T = ẋ + ẏ 2 + ż 2 . (12)
2 F about the origin respectively. For central force G = 0.
Problem A.1 * A particle in a plane has potential en- Hence angular momentum is an integral of motion
ergy (in polars)
J = const. (19)
V = −k ln r + cr + gr cos θ,
Problem B.1 Let in the problem A.3 the point of ob-
where k, c and g are positive constants. Find the po-
servation was the perihelion. Find the angle at which the
sitions of equilibrium (a) if c > g, and (b) if c < g.
earth’s orbit, and the comet’s orbits cross.
Determine whether the equilibrium is stable.
A central field Conservation of direction of angular momentum means
r that the motion is coplanar and we can introduce in the
F = F (r) (13) plane of motion polars r, θ. In these coordinates Eqs.(12)
r
and (18) can be expressed as
is always conservative: it is described by V (r), found
from the equation 1 ( 2 )
m ṙ + r2 θ̇2 + V (r) = E (20)
dV 2
= −F (r) (14) mr2 θ̇ = J. (21)
dr
For gravitation field created by a point mass M We can interpret Eq. (21) as the second law of Kepler
GM m
V =− . (15) dS J
r = = const, (22)
dt 2m
Escape velocity from the earth can be found from the
equation which is thus valid for any central field.
1 GME m Substituting θ̇ = J/mr2 in the first equation, we get
E= mv 2 − = 0.
2 e R 1 2
mṙ + U (r) = E, (23)
It is convenient to take into account, that 2
GME where
= g. (16)
R2
Hence we get J2
U (r) = V (r) + .
2mr2
vescape = (2Rg)1/2 = 11.2 km s−1 . (17)
For the motion of a material point in a central field the
Problem A.2 ** Show that the minimal velocity Ves angle θ varies monotonically while the distance from the
(relative to the earth) allowing to the rocket sent from center of the field varies in the same way as r varies in
the earth to escape from the solar system is the one-dimensional problem with the effective potential
√ √ energy U (r). Minimum of the effective potential corre-
2
Ves = vescape 2 ( 2 − 1)2 = 16.7 km s−1 ,
+ vE spond to stable circular orbit, maximum and point of
inflection correspond to unstable circular orbits.
where vescape is given by Eq. (17).
Problem A.3 A comet is observed at a distance from Problem B.2 (a) A particle of mass m moves in a po-
the sun equal to half the radius of the earth’s orbit (as- tential
sumed circular), and its velocity at that point is twice k
the orbital velocity of the earth (the orbital velocity of the V (r) = −
earth is 30 km/sec). Find its velocity when it crosses r
the earth’s orbit. Whether the comet subsequently escape How many circular orbits are possible for a given value
from the solar system? of angular momentum? Are the orbits stable?
6
Using the Kepler’s second law (22) and the formula for √ ∫
ma rdr
the surface of ellipse we obtain for the period of revolu- = √ .
tion: k a e − (r − a)2
2 2
√
S πab m 3/2 After natural substitution
τ= = J = 2π a ;
dS/dt k
2m r = a(1 − e cos ψ) (36)
thus we get Kepler’s third law
the integral takes the form
( τ )2 a3
m √ ∫
= a3 = , ma3 τ
2π k GM t= (1 − e cos ψ)dψ = (ψ − e sin ψ).
k 2π
that is the period of revolution around an elliptical orbit
depends only on the semi-major axis, and the squares of This is traditionally presented as
the revolution periods have the same ratio as the cubes
of their major semi-axes. µ = ψ − e sin ψ, (37)
8
∑∞
dψ
−1= nAn cos nµ.
dµ n=1
FIG. 5:
∫ π ( )
dψ πm
where µ = 2πt/τ is just the time in the units of the period − 1 cos mµdµ = Am .
0 dµ 2
(times 2π).
From Eqs. (36) and (32) we express the angle θ Since ψ = 0 when µ = 0 and ψ = π when µ = π we can
through ψ as change the variable to give
cos ψ − e ∫ π
cos θ = . (38) πm
1 − e cos ψ Am = cos mµdψ.
2 0
Calculating 1−cos θ and 1+cos θ from Eq. (38) we obtain Using Eq. (37) we get for the Fourier series coefficients
its alternative form ∫ π
√ 2
θ 1+e ψ Am = cos m(ψ − e sin ψ)dψ.
tan = tan . πm 0
2 1−e 2
Introducing Bessel functions
Problem D.1 Find Cartesian coordinates x and y as ∫
functions of ψ. 1 π
Jn (x) = cos(nψ − x sin ψ)dψ,
π 0
Alternatively, we can define ψ geometrically, as it is
shown on Fig. 5 we can present the series for the eccentric anomaly as
∑∞
Area of the circular sector ACQ 2Jn (ne)
ψ = 2π . ψ =µ+ sin nµ
Area of the auxiliary circle n
n=1
In fact, from geometric similarity we obtain
which converges for any value of e.
Area of the elliptic sector ASP
µ = 2π
Area of the ellipse
E. Interplanetary Travels
Area of the circular sector ASQ
= 2π
Area of the circle
Consider a body (planet, asteroid, comet, spacecraft)
S(ACQ) − S(CQS) a ψ − 12 ea2 sin ψ
1 2
on an elliptical orbit around the Sun with the semi-major
= 2π = 2 1 2 .
Area of the circle 2a axis a. As an application of Eq. (34), let us find velocity
of the body in the arbitrary point of the trajectory. If
Thus we reproduce Eq. (37). The angle θ is called in the point is on the distance r from the center, the energy
astronomy the true anomaly, the angle ψ is called the conservation law is
eccentric anomaly, and µ is called the mean anomaly.
mv 2 GMS m GMS m
Problem D.2 Obtain Eqs. (36) and (38) from Fig. 5. − =− .
2 r 2a
9
Hence
( )
2 1
v 2 = GMS − .
r a
r · p × J − mkr = r · A, (43)
or
A J2
r· +r = .
mk mk
In polar coordinates with the origin in the center we ob-
tain the equation of conic
[ ]
A
r cos(θ − θ0 ) + 1 = l,
mk
Problem E.5 Look carefully at Fig. 7. To what extent A way to solve it involves projection of this equation on
the numbers you can extract from this Figure agree with the Cartesian axes, thus obtaining the system
what is written in this Section?
mẍi = Fi , (45)
ml2 2
mr̈ = mg + f . (61) L= θ̇ − U (θ), (63)
2
The nature realizes the constraint by applying the force ( 2
)
fi , which we do not know a priori. However, we’ll be able where U (θ) = −mgl cos θ + lω 2g sin2
θ . Equilibrium
to formulate the problem in such a way, that the force points are found from equation
of constraints disappears. To do it, we introduce new [ ]
variable θ. Second, we multiply Eq. (61) by a new basis d lω 2
∂r U (θ) = 0 −→ sin θ 1 − cos θ = 0.
vector e = ∂θ . The force of constraint is perpendicular dθ g
to this direction
This equation always have solutions θ = 0, π. In addi-
f · e = 0. tion, for lω 2 /g > 1, it has solutions θ = cos−1 (g/lω 2 ).
13
2 It is obvious, that if
1
L(q̇1 , q1 ; q̇2 , q2 ) = L1 (q̇1 , q1 ) + L2 (q̇2 , q2 ),
1 2 Gm1 m2 1 GM µ
−1 L2 = µṙ + = µṙ2 + ,
2 r 2 r
and the period of a satellite motion s determined by sum
−2
of masses rather than by the mass of the heavier body.
E.g. for the earth-moon system m1 /m2 = 1/81.3. If we
−3 were to compute the period of the moon’s orbit from the
−π 0
θ π Kepler’s law by comparing it with the period of small
earth satellite without taking the effect into account we
would get the period 4 hours too long.
FIG. 9: Effective potential energy of a heavy particle on a
rotating ring as a function of θ for lω 2 /g = .5 (solid line) and Problem D.1 A double star is formed of two compo-
lω 2 /g = 4 (dashed line). nents, each with mass equal to that of the sun. The dis-
tance between them is 1 a. u. [Astronomical unit (a.u.)
is the semi-major axis of the earth’s orbit ≈ 1.5×108 km.]
For lω 2 /g < 1 the system has a stable equilibrium θ = 0. What is the orbital period?
For lω 2 /g > 1 this equilibrium becomes unstable, but
there appear two new stable equilibrium positions, cor- The mass determining the motion of the double star is
responding to cos θ = g/lω 2 . twice the mass of the sun. Because the period of motion
is inversely proportional to the square root√of mass, the
Problem C.2 A particle of mass m is constrained to orbital period of the double star is 1 year/ 2.
move in a plane which rotates with constant angular ve-
locity ω. Find and solve the equations of motion of the
particle, including the force of gravity: a) when the axis IV. SCATTERING THEORY
of rotation is vertical; b) when the axis of rotation is hor-
izontal. A. Differential Scattering Cross-Section
D. The Two-Body Problem Consider a beam of particles with the flux (a number
of particles crossing unit area normal to the beam in unit
time) fin impinging on a target. Some of the particles
Consider two particles with the interaction energy
are scattered and we can measure the flux of scattered
V (r1 − r2 ).
particles fout (it will in general depend upon where we
1 1 put the detector, that is upon scattering angle θ. We
L= m1 ṙ21 + m2 ṙ22 − V (r1 − r2 ). define the differential scattering cross-section
2 2
We define the position of center of mass R and the rela- dσ fout L2
(Θ) = ,
tive position r dΩ fin
m 1 r1 + m 2 r2 where L is the distance from the target to the detector.
R= ; r = r1 − r2 . (64)
m1 + m2 It is really the ratio between the element of surface in the
plain perpendicular to the incoming flux to the element of
Thus solid angle that the particles which traversed through the
m2 r m1 r abovementioned element of surface were scattered into.
r1 = R + ; r2 = R − , We can calculate differential scattering cross-section if we
m1 + m2 m1 + m2
know connection between impact parameter and scatter-
and we get ing angle.
1 1 dσ = b|db|dφ; dΩ = sin ΘdΘdφ.
L= M Ṙ2 + µṙ2 − V (r) = L1 + L2 ,
2 2
Hence we get
where
m1 m2 dσ b(Θ) db(Θ)
(Θ) = . (66)
sin Θ dΘ
M = m1 + m2 ; µ = . (65)
m1 + m2 dΩ
14
B. Rutherford Scattering
θ
i In 1908 Hans Geiger and Ernest Marsden, working
with Ernest Rutherford of the Physical Laboratories at
b R the University of Manchester, measured the angular dis-
tribution of alpha particles scattered from a thin gold
foil.
From Eq. (32) follows, that the directions in which r
becomes infinite are:
Problem C.1 * Put V = k/r in Eq. (77), calculate where n is the concentration of scatterers. Consider a
integral and show that thus way you reproduce Rutherford beam of particles with flux f impinging normally on a
formula (75). wall. The attenuation of the beam is described by an
equation
Consider potential V (r) = α/r2 (α > 0). From the
df (x)
Eq. (77) we get = −f (x)/λ.
dx
[ ( ]
α )−1/2 The solution is
Θ(b) = π 1 − 1 + 2 , (78)
b E
f (x) = f e−x/λ ,
or, equivalently,
where λ is the mean free path.
2 α (π − Θ)2
b = . (79) Problem D.1 A beam of particles strikes a wall con-
E Θ(2π − Θ)
taining 2 × 1029 atoms m−3 . Each atom behaves like a
Hence sphere of radius 3 × 10−15 m. Find the thickness of wall
that exactly half the particles will penetrate without scat-
dσ π2 α π−Θ tering. What thickness would be needed to stop all but
= . (80)
dΩ E sin Θ Θ2 (2π − Θ)2 one particle in 106 ?
16
q1
q*
1 p1 2 θ1
1 θ* 2
θ2
q2 p* -p *
-q *
FIG. 11: Collision as it looks in the LS.
Consider particle with mass m1 impinging on a par- Eq. (82) looks especially simple for equal masses. In this
ticle at rest with mass m2 . The scattering problem is case we get
most easily solved in the CM system. As it was shown is
Subsection III D, we should consider the scattering of the
particle of reduced mass µ = m1 m2 /(m1 + m2 ) with the Θ1 = Θ∗ /2. (84)
same as in the Laboratory system (LS) initial velocity
v∞ and impact parameter b. After finding scattering an-
gle in the CM system Θ∗ , we can calculate the scattering
Problem E.1 A proton is elastically scattered through
Θ1 and recoil Θ2 angles in the LS. The connection be-
an angle of 56o by a nucleus, which recoils at an angle of
tween the angles is obtained from the connection between
600 . Find the atomic mass of the nucleus and the fraction
the momenta in the CM and LS. Because the LS moves
of the kinetic energy transferred to it.
relative to the CM system with the velocity p∗ /m2 , the
connection between the momenta is
m1 ∗ m1 ∗
p1 = p∗ + p , q1 = q∗ + p , q2 = −q∗ + p∗(81)
.
m2 m2 Problem E.2 * Two identical charged particles, each of
mass m and charge e, are initially far apart. One of
Hence we get
the particles is at rest at the origin, and the other is
sin Θ∗ approaching it with the velocity v along the line y = b,
tan Θ1 = , (82) z = 0, where b = 2e2 /mv 2 . Find the scattering angle in
m1 /m2 + cos Θ∗
1 the CM frame, and the directions in which two particles
Θ2 = (π − Θ∗ ). (83) emerge in the LS.
2
17
F. CM and LS Cross-sections Consider first rotations about the OZ axis. From simple
geometrical reasoning follows that
Analysis of the scattering problem in the CM system x′1 = x1 cos Φ − x2 sin Φ
gives
x′2 = x1 sin Φ + x2 cos Φ
dσ x′3 = x3 .
(Θ∗ ).
dΩ∗
Considering general case and presenting radius-vector in
To find the LS differential cross-sections we use the rela- the form
tion
r = n(n · r) + [r − n(n · r)], (88)
dΩ∗ sin Θ∗ dΘ∗
= where n is a unit vector in the direction of OZ axis, we
dΩ sin ΘdΘ
obtain that the coordinates of the point after the rotation
Thus for the scattering of the first particle are connected with its coordinates before the rotation by
the Equation
dσ1 sin Θ∗ dΘ∗ dσ
(Θ1 ) = (Θ∗ ), (85) r′ = n(n · r) + [r − n(n · r)] cos Φ + (n × r) sin Φ. (89)
dΩ sin Θ1 dΘ1 dΩ∗
Consider rotation during an infinitesimal time dt. In
where Θ∗ is given by Eq. (82), and for the recoil of the this case the angle of rotation is proportional to dt (with
second particle some coefficient of proportionality ω) and Eq. (89) takes
the form
dσ2 2 sin(π − 2Θ2 ) dσ
(Θ2 ) = (π − 2Θ2 )
dΩ sin Θ2 dΩ∗ ω × r]dt,
dr = [⃗ (90)
dσ
= 4 cos Θ2 ∗ (π − 2Θ2 ) where we have introduced the vector of angular velocity
dΩ
ω
⃗ = nω. Being presented as
Consider Coulomb scattering of two identical parti-
ω × r],
ṙLS = [⃗ (91)
cles, the first initially moving and the second at rest.
In the CM frame of reference the solution is given by Eq. (93) is a manifestation of a general rule, which gives
Eq. (75). Because the particles are identical we should the derivative, in the LS, of any vector constant in the
sum up cross-sections for the scattered particles and the RS. If the vector in addition changes in the RS, the law of
recoiled particles. transformation of an arbitrary vector b can be presented
as
dσ dσ1 dσ2
(Θ) = (Θ) + (Θ). (86)
dΩ dΩ dΩ ω × b].
ḃLS = ḃ + [⃗ (92)
⃗ × [⃗
v̇LS = V̇ + v̇ + ω ω × r] + 2⃗ ⃗˙ × r.
ω×v+ω
A rotation is a rigid body movement which keeps a
point fixed. This definition applies to rotations within
both two and three dimensions (in a plane and in space, B. Inertial Forces
respectively.) All rigid body movements are rotations,
translations, or combinations of the two. Euler’s rota-
tion theorem says that a rotation in three-dimensional The second law of Newton mr̈LS = F, in the RS is
space keeps an entire line fixed. From Euler theorem fol- presented as
lows that a space rotation can be specified by the axis of mr̈ = F − mV̇ + mω 2 r⊥ + 2mv × ω ⃗˙ ,
⃗ + mr × ω
rotation, defined by unit vector n = (n1 , n2 , n3 ), and the
angle of rotation Φ. In this section we’ll talk about ro- where r⊥ = r − ω ω · r)/ω 2 is the part of r perpendicular
⃗ (⃗
tations of the frame of reference of the Rotating System ⃗ . The term mω 2 r⊥ is called the centrifugal force; the
to ω
(RS) with respect to inertial Laboratory System (LS). term 2mṙ × ω⃗ is the Coriolis force.
18
ω ⃗ = −(e/2m)B we get
If we chose ω
k ( e )2
r̈ = − r + B × (B × r)
j k mr3 2m
θ If we assume that the magnetic field is sufficiently weak
the last term drops out also.
North
system, whichever origin we chose, moves translationaly Problem C.1 *Prove the following relations
together with the chosen point and is, in general, non- ∑
inertial. Newton’s equations of motion in such frame of Tr I = 2 mr2
reference are different from Eq. (96); they take the form ∑ 1
∑ mxi xk = (Tr I) δik − Iik
mr̈α = F(e) Fαβ − mα a, 2
α + (99)
β Choosing a suitable set of axes we can always reduce
tensor of inertia to a diagonal form
where we have added fictitious inertial forces (a is the
acceleration of the frame of reference). However, if the
I1 0 0
origin is chosen in the center of mass of the body, after I = 0 I2 0 ,
multiplying Eqs. (99) by ri and summing up we again 0 0 I3
obtain Eq. (98). Because forces of gravitation are also
proportional to masses, choosing origin in the center of and Eq. (101) to
mass we also nullify their torque. Also, Eq. (97) can be
rewritten as J1 = I1 ω1 , J2 = I2 ω2 , J3 = I3 ω3 . (104)
R̈CM = F, Such axes are called the principal axes, and the corre-
sponding diagonal elements I1 , I2 and I3 – the principal
where RCM is the radius-vector of the center of mass.
moments of inertia. If I1 = I2 = I3 the top is called
Problem B.1 * Calculate acceleration of a cylinder spherical. If I1 = I2 ̸= I3 the top is called symmetric.
rolling without slipping down an inclined plane making For a body with cylindrical symmetry, choosing axis
angle θ to the horizontal. OZ on the direction of the symmetry axis we obtain the
tensor of inertia in the diagonal form, with I1 = I2 . If
Body System (BS) is the frame of reference with the the body is in addition flat (z = 0 for all points), we get
axes frozen into the body. I3 = 2I1 .
G · n = [r × F] · n = r · [F × n] = rmin F sin θ, X N
Problem D.5 ** A door is constructed of a thin homo- Problem E.1 ** A thin uniform disk of radius a and
geneous slab of material: it has a width of 1m. If the mass m is rotating with a uniform angular velocity ω
door is open through 90◦ , it is found that on release it about a fixed axis passing through its center but inclined
closes itself in 2 s. Assume that the hinges are friction- at an angle α to the axis of symmetry. Find the direc-
less, and show that the line of hinges must make an angle tion and magnitude of the torque which is exerted at the
of approximately 3◦ with the vertical. bearings.
22
ω1
direction of the constant angular momentum J of the top.
Projecting J at the axes of the BS, we can write down
Eq. (104) as
θ = const (120)
Z x3
ω3 (I1 − I3 )
ψ = t. (121)
I1
CM
Eqs. (118), (120) and (121) reproduce the solution ob-
tained previously using the Space System.
θ
Problem G.1 A Frisbee is thrown into the air in such a
r
way, that it has a definite wobble. The air friction exerts
a frictional torque −c⃗ω on the rotation of the Frisbee.
Mg
(a) * Show that the component of ω ⃗ in the direction of
the symmetry axis decreases exponentially with time.
(b) ** Show that the angle α between the symmetry axis
⃗ 0 and leave in Eqs. (115)-(117) only terms linear with
ω
and the angular velocity vector ω decreases with time if
respect to small deviations of ω
⃗ from (0, 0, Ω). Thus Eq.
the moment of inertia about the symmetry axis is larger
(117) in this approximation is
than the moment about the axes normal to the symmetry
axis, which is the case for a flat-type object. Thus the ω̇3 = 0, (126)
degree of wobble steadily diminishes if there is air friction.
giving ω3 = Ω = const. Hence, Eqs. (115),(116) can be
The Euler equations are
written as
I1 ω̇1 + (I3 − I1 )ω2 ω3 = −cω1 (122)
I1 ω̇1 + (I3 − I2 )Ωω2 = 0 (127)
I1 ω̇2 + (I1 − I3 )ω1 ω3 = −cω2 (123)
I2 ω̇2 + (I1 − I3 )Ωω1 = 0. (128)
I3 ω̇3 = −cω3 . (124)
After we differentiate Eq. (127) with respect to time and
Solving Eq. (124) we obtain
substitute ω̇2 from Eq. (128) we obtain
ω3 = Ae−ct/I3
ω̈1 + Bω1 = 0, (129)
For α we obtain
where
ω3
cos α = √ 2 .
ω1 + ω22 + ω32 (I1 − I3 )(I2 − I3 )Ω2
B= .
I1 I2
To get ω12 + ω22 we multiply Eq. (122) by ω1 , Eq. (123) √
by ω2 and add up the results. Thus we obtain The two √ independent solutions of√Eq. (129) are sin( √ B)
and cos( B) if B > 0, and exp( −B) and exp(− −B)
I1 (ω1 ω̇1 + ω2 ω̇2 ) = −c(ω12 + ω22 ). if B < 0. Hence If I3 > I1 , I2 or I3 < I1 , I2 , then B > 0.
The solution is If I2 > I3 > I1 , then B < 0. So the free rotation of the
asymmetric top about the principal axis with the mini-
ω12 + ω22 = B 2 e−2ct/I1 . mal or maximal moment of inertia is stable, the rotation
about the principal axis with the intermediate moment
Hence of inertia is unstable.
A Problem G.2 A solid rectangular box, of dimensions
cos α = √ .
2
B e −2(1/I1 −1/I3 )t + A2 100mm×60mm×20mm, is spinning freely with angular
velocity 240 r.p.m. Determine the frequency of small os-
Taking into account that I3 > I1 , we see that limt→∞ α =
cillations of the axis if the axis of rotation is (a) the
0.
longest, and (b) the shortest axis.
The general solution of Eqs. (115)-(117) for the free
motion of the asymmetric top is rather complicated. We
notice however, that there are three trivial particular so- H. Effect of Small Force
lutions of these equations - rotation of about one of a
principal axes, say
Consider heavy symmetric top rotating about the fixed
⃗ 0 = (0, 0, Ω).
ω (125) point, at a distance r from the CM. Eq. (98), in this case
takes the form
In this case ω
⃗ remains constant also in the LS. To analyze
the stability of such a solution, we can consider ω close to J̇ = n × rM g, (130)
24
where n is the unit vector in the direction of the figure Problem H.2 * A gyroscope consisting of a uniform
axis. The solution of Eq. (130) is rather complicated; solid sphere of radius 0.1 m is spinning at 3000 r.p.m.
later we’ll obtain general solution of the problem in the about a horizontal axis. Due to faulty construction, the
framework of Hamilton mechanics. Now we consider the fixed point is not precisely at the center, but 20 µm away
case of small force and in addition assume that the body from it along the axis. Find the time taken for the axis
was initially freely rotating about the figure axis. (This to move through 1o .
case is in fact approximate gyroscope theory.) Let us
make an approximation Problem H.3 * A toy gyroscope has a mass of 100 g and
is made in the form of a uniform disk of radius a = 2
J = I3 ω3 n, cm fastened to a light spindle, the center of the disk being
where n is the unit vector in the direction of the figure 2 cm from the pivot. If the gyroscope is set spinning at
axis. Thus Eq. (130) takes the form a rate of 20 revolutions per second, find the period for
steady horizontal precession.
d
(I3 ω3 n) = n × rM g. (131)
dt
Writing down Eq. (131) as VII. RIGID BODY: LAGRANGE MECHANICS
θ θ
a a
M M
o
2m m
m
B. The Lagrangian of a Heavy Symmetric Top
Problem A.1 A uniform block of mass m and dimen-
sions a×2a×3a spins about a long diagonal with angular
The Lagrangian of a heavy symmetric top according
velocity ω. Using a coordinate system with origin at the
to Eq. (139) is
center of the block,
a) Find the kinetic energy I1 2 I3
b) Find the angular velocity vector and the angular mo- L= (ω1 + ω22 ) + ω32 − M gr cos θ.
2 2
mentum vector about the origin.
In the present approach instead of solving Eqs. (97) Using Eq. (109) and taking into account that ω12 + ω22 =
and (98), which was done in Newton mechanics we solve φ̇2 sin2 θ + θ̇2 , we obtain
Lagrange equations for the Lagrangian
I1 ( 2 2 ) I (
3
)2
L = T − V. (140) L= φ̇ sin θ + θ̇2 + φ̇ cos θ + ψ̇
2 2
For the rotation about a fixed axis −M gr cos θ. (142)
I
Trot = φ̇2 . (141) Problem B.1 ** A simple gyrocompass consists of a gy-
2 roscope spinning about it’s axis with angular velocity ω3 .
Problem A.2 * Solve Problem B.1 from Section VI in The moment of inertia about this axis is I3 , that about a
the framework of Lagrange mechanics. transverse axis is I1 .The gyroscope is free to rotate in a
Problem A.3 A uniform solid cylindrical drum of mass horizontal plane. If the gyro is placed at the earth’s equa-
M and radius a is free to rotate about a horizontal axis. tor, the angular velocity of of the earth being Ω, show that
(a) Masses m and 2m are joined by a light inextensible the axis of the gyro will oscillate about the north-south di-
cable which runs without slipping over a drum. Using the rection; and for small amplitudes of oscillations find this
angular position of the pulley as generalized co-ordinate, period. Remember that ω3 ≫ Ω is an excellent approxi-
write down the Lagrangian function, and the Lagrange mation.
equation. Find the acceleration of the masses.
(b)* A cable is wound on the drum, and carries on its
free end a mass m. Find the Lagrangian function for the C. Steady Precession of a Heavy Symmetric Top
system if the cable is elastic with elastic potential energy
1 2
2 kx , where x is an extension of the cable. Show that
If coordinates q1 , . . . , qs do not appear in Lagrangian
the motion of the mass m is a uniform acceleration with explicitly, that is if
a superimposed oscillation of angular frequency given by
ω 2 = k(M + 2m)/M m. Find the amplitude of this os- L = L(q̇1 , . . . , q̇n ; qs+1 , . . . , qn ), (143)
cillation if the system is released from rest with the cable
unextended. these coordinates are called ignorable. Steady motion
is characterized by all non-ignorable coordinates being
Problem A.4 * A uniform bar of mass M and length constant:
2l is suspended from one end by a spring of forth con-
stant k. The bar can swing freely only in one vertical q̇i = 0, i = s + 1, . . . , n.
plane, and the spring is constrained to move only in the
vertical direction. Set up the equations of motion in the Lagrange equations
Lagrangian formulation.
( )
d ∂L ∂L
Problem A.5 ** A uniform plank of length 2a is placed − = 0, i = 1, . . . , n
with one end on a smooth horizontal floor and the other dt ∂ q̇i ∂qi
against a smooth vertical wall. Write down the La-
grangian function, using angle θ of inclination to the can be written explicitly as
horizontal as a generalized co-ordinate. Given that the
∑n
∂2L ∑n
∂2L ∂L
plank is initially at rest at an inclination of 60◦ , find the q̈j + q̇j − = 0, i = 1, . . . , n.
angle at which it looses the contact with the wall. j=1
∂ q̇i ∂ q̇ j j=1
∂ q̇ i ∂q j ∂q i
26
In the second sum for j = 1, . . . , s we get ∂L/∂qj = 0, Problem C.3 * Find the Lagrangian function for a
and for j = s + 1, . . . , n we get q̇j = 0. Hence we have symmetric top whose pivot is free to slide on a smooth
horizontal table, in terms of the generalized co-ordinates
∑s
∂2L ∂L X, Y, φ, θ, ψ, and the principal moments about the center
q̈j − = 0, i = 1, . . . , n. (144)
∂ q̇i ∂ q̇j ∂qi of mass. (Note that Z is related to θ.) Show that the hor-
j=1
izontal motion of the center of mass may be completely
Consider i = 1, . . . , s. In this case ∂L/∂qi = 0, Hence we separated from the rotational motion. Are the preces-
obtain sional angular velocities greater or less than in the case
of a fixed pivot? Show that steady precession at a given
∑s
∂2L
q̈j = 0, i = 1, . . . , s, value of θ can occur for a smaller value of ω3 than in the
j=1
∂ q̇i ∂ q̇j case of a fixed pivot.
q̈i = 0, i = 1, . . . , s, 1( 2 ) I∗ ( )
L = Ẋ + Ẏ 2 + r2 sin2 θ̇2 + 1 φ̇2 sin2 θ + θ̇2
2 2
which means that all the velocities referring to the ignor- I3 ( )2
able coordinates are constant. For i = s + 1, . . . , n from + φ̇ cos θ + ψ̇ − M gr cos θ, (149)
2
Eq. (144) we obtain
where I1∗ is the component of the inertia tensor, calcu-
∂L lated when the origin is chosen in the center of mass.
= 0, i = s + 1, . . . , n,
∂qi When we considered the motion of the top with the fixed
which serves as connections between the appropriate ve- pivot, we were choosing the origin in the fixed pivot and
locities. obtained I1 . One can see that I1∗ < I1 . For steady pre-
Looking at the Lagrangian Eq. (142) we see that the cession we recover Eq. (145) (with the modified I1 )
co-ordinates ψ and φ are ignorable. Hence the steady
I1∗ cos θφ̇2 − I3 ω3 φ̇ + M gr = 0.
precession of a heavy symmetric top is described by the
equation The result for the fast precession
∂L [ ]
= sin θ I1 cos θφ̇2 − I3 ω3 φ̇ + M gr = 0. (145) I3 ω3
∂θ φ̇1 =
I1∗
cos θ
The solutions for the precession rate are
√ shows that the precession rate is largen than in the case
I3 ω3 ± I32 ω32 − 4I1 M gr cos θ of fixed pivot. In the approximation which was used to
φ̇ = . (146)
2I1 cos θ obtain Eq. (148), the rate of the precession does not
change. In the next approximation we obtain Eq. (148)
For the case of fast top: I32 ω32 ≫ I1 M gr cos θ we obtain in the form
fast precession
M gr I1∗ M 2 g 2 r2 cos θ
I3 ω3 φ̇2 = + ,
φ̇1 = , (147) I3 ω3 I33 ω32
I1 cos θ
and slow precession and hence the precession rate is less than for the case of
fixed pivot.
M gr
φ̇2 = . (148) Problem C.4 ** Obtain equation
I3 ω3
Now, in particular, we understand that the approximate I1 cos θφ̇2 − I3 ω3 φ̇ + M gr = 0
gyroscope theory describes steady precession of a fast
top, and find the limits of applicability of this approxi- from Euler’s equations of motion, by imposing the re-
mation. quirement that the motion be a steady precession.
suggests the idea to to make a transformation from ve- Hence the Hamiltonian is
locities q̇i to momenta ( )
1 2 p2θ
H= pr + 2 + V (r), (155)
∂L 2m r
pi = . (151)
∂ q̇i
Problem B.1 Show that from Lagrangian
The transformation at least simplifies the lhs of Eqs. m 2
(150); say, first equation becomes L= ṙ − V (r)
2
( )
∂L follows Hamiltonian, which can be written as
ṗ1 = .
∂q1 q2 ,...,q̇1 ,q̇2 ,... 1 ( 2 )
H = px + p2y + p2z + V (x, y, z),
Since we introduced momenta instead ( of ) velocities 2m ( )
∂L
we need to express partial derivative ∂q 1 2
p2φ 2
1
q2 ,...,q̇1 ,q̇2 ,... H = pr + 2 + pz + V (r, φ, z),
through the derivative (. . . )q2 ,...,,p1 ,p2 ,... . This can be 2m r
( )
achieved by a transformation of the Lagrangian, that is 1 p2θ p2φ
2
by introducing instead of the Lagrangian the Hamilton H = pr + 2 + 2 2 + V (r, θ, φ),
function 2m r r sin θ
∑
H(p1 , . . . , pn ; q1 , . . . , qn ) = pi q̇i − L, (152) in Cartesian, cylindrical and spherical systems respec-
i tively.
where in the lhs q̇i should be expressed through pi using Problem B.2 Find the Hamiltonian for the anharmonic
Eq. (151). (Such simultaneous transformation of the oscillator, described by the Lagrangian
(part of) independent variables and of the function is
ẋ2 ω 2 x2
called in mathematics Legendre’s dual transformation.) L= + − αx3 + βxẋ2
For the differential of the Hamiltonian we obtain 2 2
∑ ∑ ∑ ∂L ∑ ∂L Problem B.3 Show that the Hamiltonian function for a
δH = pi δ q̇i + q̇i δpi − δ q̇i − δpi . particle of charge q in an electromagnetic field is
i i i
∂ q̇i i
∂pi
H = (p − qA)2 /2m + qϕ.
Using Eq. (151) we obtain
Problem B.4 Given a Hamiltonian function H(p, q, t),
∑ ∑ ∂L
δH = q̇i δpi − δpi . how does one obtain the corresponding Lagrangian?
i i
∂pi
Problem B.5 Solve the Problem 62 from Section III us-
Hence we obtain instead of n second order differential ing Hamilton’s equations.
equations by Lagrange 2n first order differential equa-
Problem B.6 Find the law of motion of the particle
tions by Hamilton
whose Hamiltonian is
∂H ( 2 )2
q̇i = p2 ω02 x2 p ω02 x2
∂pi H(x, p) = + +λ +
2 2 2 2
∂H
ṗi = − . (153) Hamilton’s equations are
∂qi
[ ( 2 )]
dp p ω 2 x2
= −ω02 x 1 + 2λ + 0
B. Hamiltonians and Hamilton Equations dt 2 2
[ ( 2 2 2
)]
dx p ω x
= p 1 + 2λ + 0 .
If the Lagrangian is dt 2 2
m 2 Because the Hamiltonian is integral of motion we can
L= ẋ − V (x),
2 introduce the constant
the momentum is p = mẋ, and the Hamiltonian is p2 ω 2 x2
+ 0 = Ẽ. (156)
p2 2 2
H= + V (x).
2m Thus the Hamilton’s equations become
In 2D in polars the Lagrangian of a particle in a central dp [ ]
field is = −ω02 x 1 + 2λẼ
dt
m dx [ ]
L = (ṙ2 + r2 θ̇2 ) − V (r). (154) = p 1 + 2λẼ .
2 dt
28
The solution is
[ ]
x = A sin ω0 (1 + 2λẼ)t + ϕ
g θ R
[ ]
p = Aω0 cos ω0 (1 + 2λẼ)t + ϕ .
m
From Eq. (156) we obtain
Obviously, the period of motion is For the Hamiltonian (155) the coordinate θ is ignor-
able, pθ = const = J, and the problem is reduced to a
√
m one dimensional one, with the Hamiltonian
T = 2π .
k p2r J2
H= + + V (r). (158)
The Hamiltonian is 2m 2mr2
( ) The Hamiltonian (158) is by itself integral of motion (see
p2 kx2 at2 Eqs (170) and (278)):
H= + pa0 t + + mg −x .
2m 2 2
p2r J2
+ + V (r) = E. (159)
The Hamilton equations of motion are 2m 2mr2
p From Hamilton’s Equation
ẋ = + a0 t
m ∂H pr
ṗ = −kx + g. ṙ = =
∂pr m
29
U/Mgr
2 2mr2
Problem C.1 A simple pendulum of mass m and length 200
l hangs from a trolley of mass M running on smooth
horizontal rails. The pendulum swings in a plane paral- 100
lel to the rails. Using the position x of the trolley and
the angle of inclination θ of the pendulum as generalized 0
0 1 2 3
co-ordinates, find the Hamiltonian and show that x is ig- θ
norable.
FIG. 16: Effective potential for p2φ /2M grI1 = 100,
p2ψ /2M grI1 = 1.
D. Heavy Symmetric Top: General Solution
ρ a
η
θ
r
E E b
x M
RM
G(mE + MM ) We have
ω2 = 3
RM 1 1
= √ .
RM mM |R − r| R 1 − 2 R·r r2
x= R2 + R2
mE + mM
Hence expanding with respect to inverse powers of 1/R
Because the surface of the water should be equipotential we obtain
we get
1 1 R · r 3(R · r)2 − R2 r2
= + + + ....
Φ(a + h, θ) = const, |R − r| R R3 2R5
Hence
where a is the radius of the Earth. Expanding and ne- GM
glecting terms quadratic and higher in h and terms of Φ(R) = Φ0 (R) + Φ1 (R) + Φ2 (R) + · · · = −
R
order [(mE + mM )/mE ](a/r)3 we obtain ∫
GM R · r 3(R · r)2 − R2 r2 3
− − G ρ(r) d r + . . . .(173)
mE h mM a2 ( ) R3 2R5
2
− 3 3 cos2 θ − 1 = const.
a 2RM If we chose origin in the center of mass, then Φ1 (R) = 0.
Taking into account that
Hence
(R · r)2 = Xi Xj xi xj ,
3mM a4 cos2 θ and the results of Problem (C.1) from Section VI, the
h(θ) = 3 + h0 . (172)
2mE RM term Φ2 can be presented as
( )
G 3Xi Iij Xj G
We have mM /mE = 1/81.3 and a/RM = 1/60.3. Thus Φ2 (r) = − T r I .= (3IR − T r I),
using a = 6370 km we find ∆h = 0.36 m. 2R3 R2 2R3
Eq. (172) is equally applicable for the tide induced by where IR is the moment of inertia about the direction of
the Sun, provided we take appropriate mass and distance R (Eq. (??)).
from the earth. For the sun mS /mE = 3.33 × 105 and Let the directional cosines of the radius-vector R in
a/rS = 4.26 × 10−5 . The sun tide ∆h = 0.16 m. the system of the principal axes of the body be α, β, γ.
Then
Problem B.1 * The distance between the earth and the IR = I1 cos2 α + I2 cos2 β + I3 cos2 γ.
moon is gradually increasing (because of tidal friction).
Estimate the height of the tides when the moon was 10 If the gravitating body is a symmetric top,
earth radii away.
IR = I1 + (I3 − I1 ) cos2 γ.
N θ ∂L
= 0,
∂θ
where the Lagrangian is
k
I1 ( 2 2 ) I (
3
)2
y L= φ̇ sin θ + θ̇2 + φ̇ cos θ + ψ̇ − V (θ).
λ 2 2
Differentiating and ignoring the term with φ̇2 for slow
x precession we obtain
FIG. 18: Diagram of figure axis of the earth relative to orbit 1 ∂V 3GmS
φ̇ = − = − 3 , ϵI cos θ. (174)
of mass point. I3 ω3 sin θ ∂θ 2RS ω3
where RS is the distance between the Sun and the Earth.
Problem C.1 ** Find the gravitational potential at It is convenient to present Eq. (174) in the form
large distances of a thin circular loop of radius a and
Tprec 2T0
mass m, up to terms of order R−3 . =− , (175)
T0 3T3 ϵI cos θ
The earth is a spheroid (ellipsoid of revolution) with where T0 is one year
semi-axes, a, a, c and very small oblateness ϵ:
( )2
2π GmS
a ≈ c ≈ 6400km T0
=
RS3
, (176)
a−c 1
ϵ= ≈ .
a 300 T3 is one day, and θ = 23◦ 27′ . Thus for the period of
precession we obtain
If we consider the earth as homogeneous we can use the
results of Eq. (105) and get (taking into account that 2 · 365.25
ϵ ≪ 1) Tprec = = 81000 [years]. (177)
3 · 0.00327 · cos 23◦ 27′
2 If we take into account also the influence of the moon
I1 ≈ I3 ≈ M a2 we should divide the result of Eq. (177) by 1 +
5
I3 − I1 mM RS3 /mS RM3
= 3.2, where RM is the distance between
ϵI ≡ ≈ ϵ, the Moon and the Earth. Taking mM /mS = 3.7 × 10−8
I3
and RS /RM = 3.9 × 102 we obtain
In reality the earth is strongly nonhomogeneous and
Tprec = 26000 years, (178)
1
I1 ≈ I3 ≈ M a 2 which is observed by astronomers.
3 The radius vector of the satellite is determined by the
ϵI ≈ .00327.
angle between the normal to the orbit plane and the earth
axis θ and the azimuthal angle describing the position of
the satellite at the orbit λ. In this case averaging gives
D. Precession of Equinoxes and Satellite Orbits
an opportunity to consider satellite as a spinning ring,
V = ms Φ, and I3 = ms r2 and ω3 refer in this case to the
Consider motion of the Sun around the earth; the fig- ring (ms is the mass of the satellite). Consider a satellite
ure axis of the earth is in the xz plane. For the potential in a circular orbit of radius r in a plane inclined to the
we obtain equator at an angle θ. We get for the precession rate
G(I3 − I1 ) φ̇ 3 I3 − I1
Φ2 (R) = [3 sin2 θ cos2 λ − 1], =− cos θ, (179)
2R3 ω3 2 M R2
where λ is ecliptic longitude. Averaging with respect to where ω32 = GM
a3 , and M is the mass of the earth. We get
time, for a circular orbit we obtain
[ ] φ̇ 1 ( a )2
G(I3 − I1 ) 3 ≈ − ϵI cos θ. (180)
Φ̄2 (θ) = sin2
θ − 1 . ω3 2 R
2R3 2
A plane of a close satellite orbit with the inclination to
the equator, say 30o , precesses completely around 2π in
V = mS Φ̄2 (θ), about 700 orbits of the satellite.
34
E. The Shape of the Earth is minimal (or maximal). If y(x) is such a function, then
for any function η(x), such that η(a) = η(b) = 0,
To find the equilibrium shape of the earth we should
d
equilibrate the potentials at the pole and at the I[y + ϵη]|ϵ=0 = 0. (187)
equator, including the centrifugal potential: Φcent = dϵ
− 12 ω 2 r2 sin2 θ. In other words
GM GM a J2 2
GM GM J2 1 ∫ b [ ]
− =− − − ω 2 a2 , (181) ∂L ∂L
c
+
c3 a 2a 2 η + ′ η ′ dx = 0. (188)
a ∂y ∂y
where
Integrating by parts we get
I3 − I1 ∫ x2 [ ( )]
J2 = . (182) ∂L d ∂L
M a2 − ηdx = 0. (189)
Keeping only the terms up to the fist order with respect x1 ∂y dx ∂y ′
to ϵ we get
Hence we obtain Euler-Lagrange equation
2
ω a ( )
= 2ϵ − 3J2 , (183) ∂L d ∂L
g0 − = 0. (190)
∂y dx ∂y ′
where g0 = GM/a2 . For constant density (J2 = 52 ϵ) this
gives ϵ = 1/230. In two particular cases we cam immediately obtain the
first integral of the Euler-Lagrange equation:
Problem E.1 The rotation period of Jupiter is approx- 1. f does not depend on y.
imately 10 hours. Its mass and radius are 318 ME and In this case we get
11.0RE respectively (E=earth). Calculate approximately
its oblateness, neglecting the variation of density. (The ∂L
= C. (191)
observe value is about 1/15.) ∂y ′
In other words among all functions y(x), such that If from Eq. (195) we can explicitly find
y(x1 ) = y1 , y(x2 ) = y2 we should find the function, for
which integral y ′ = Φ(y), (196)
∫ x2 √
then the equation can be solved in quadratures
l= 1 + y ′2 dx (185)
x1 ∫
dy
x= . (197)
is minimal. Φ(y)
Variational calculus deals with the problem of finding
function y(x), with given values y(a) and y(b), such, that The problem of geodesic on a plain corresponds to ei-
functional ther one of the particular cases, mentioned above. We
∫ b get
I= L(y ′ , y, x)dx = I[y(x)] (186)
a
y ′ = C =⇒ y = Cx + b. (198)
35
So the geodesic between the points (x1 , y1 ) and (x2 , y2 ) The geodesic is a great circle, that is the intersection of
is a sphere and a plain passing through the center of the
sphere.
y2 − y1 y1 x2 − x1 y2
y= x+ (199) If we were looking for φ as a function of θ, we would
x2 − x1 x2 − x1 get
To find geodesic on a sphere ∫ √
l= 1 + sin2 θφ′2 dθ.
r = 1, (200)
Problem A.1 ** Two cities - Tel-Aviv, Israel and San- B. The Brachistochrone Problem
Diego, CA - have the same latitude 32o N, but, different
longitudes: Tel-Aviv is 34o E and San-Diego is 117o W.
Find the shape of the curve down which a bead sliding
Do you think that the shortest path between them is along
from rest and accelerated by gravity will slip (without
the 32o latitude line? If not, what is the maximal distance
friction ) from one point to another in the least time. The
between the path and the latitude line?
term derives from the Greek (brachistos) ”the shortest”
Eqs. (200) and (206) can be presented as and (chronos) ”time, delay.” We should make stationary
the integral
{
r=1 ∫ √
cos θ = A cos α sin θ cos φ + A sin α sin θ sin φ
.(208) 1 1 + y ′2
T =√ √ dx
2g y
Multiplying the second equation by r, and rewriting it in
Cartesian coordinates, we obtain Eq. (208) in the form (we have chosen y = 0 at the initial point, and downward
{ direction of the axis y). Eq. (195) gives
r=1
. (209)
z = ax + by y(1 + y ′2 ) = C.
36
subject to a constraint
∫ b
G[y(x)] = g(y ′ , y, x)dx = C = const. (214)
a x
It is equivalent to finding the stationary value of the func- R
tional
∫ b ωt
H= (L − λg)dx. l
a θ
The solution depends upon λ, which is found from Eq. m
(214). y
For example, given two points x1 and x2 on the x axis,
and an arc length l > x2 − x1 , the shape of the curve
enclosing the largest area is given by the equation D. Hamilton’s Principle
∫ √
δ [y − λ 1 + y ′2 ]dx = 0. State of a system, defined by coordinates and time q, t
is a point, and it’s motion is a trajectory in a space-time.
−λy ′2 √ Hamilton’s Principle states that given initial (q0 , t0 ) and
√ − y + λ 1 + y ′2 = C. final (q1 , t1 ) points in space-time, the trajectory of the
1+y ′2
system with the Lagrangian L(q̇, q, t) is such that the
integral
λ2
y ′2 = − 1. ∫ t1
(C + y)2
δS = δ L(q̇, q, t)dt = 0. (216)
∫ √ t0
dy
x= √ = λ2 − (C + y)2 + B. (Action takes the least possible value among all others
λ2
(C+y)2 −1
trajectories with the same initial and final points.) La-
grange equations follow from this variational principle.
(x − B)2 + (C + y)2 = λ2 . Two Lagrangians L2 and L1 , connected by the relation
Problem C.1 A curve of given total length is drawn in d
a plane between the points (±a, 0). Find the shape that L2 (q̇, q, t) = L1 (q̇, q, t) + Φ(q, t),
dt
will enclose the largest possible area between the curve
and the x-axis. where Φ is some function of q and t (not q̇), are equivalent
Consider because the contribution from the term dΦ(q, t)/dt to the
∫ a uniform chain hanging from two fixed action does not depend upon the trajectory.
points.
∫ yds is stationary subject to the condition
ds =const. The shape of the chain is given by the Problem D.1 ** A pendulum clock is designed for use
equation on a gravity-free spacecraft.The mechanism is a simple
∫ √ pendulum (mass m at the end of a massless rod of length
δ (y − λ) 1 + y ′2 dx = 0.
l) hung from a pivot, about which it can swing in a plane.
To provide artificial gravity, the pivot is forced to rotate
From Eq. (195) we obtain
at a frequency ω in a circle of radius R in the same plane
y ′ (y − λ) as the pendulum arm. Show that the motions θ(t) of this
√ = C.
1 + y ′2 pendulum are identical to the motions θ(t) of a simple
pendulum in a uniform gravitational field of strength g =
The solution is
∫ ω 2 R.
dy y−λ
x= √( )2 = C cosh−1 + A,
C The coordinates of the mass are
y−λ
C −1
x = R sin ωt + l sin(ωt + θ)
or, equivalently, y = R cos ωt + l cos(ωt + θ).
x−A
y = λ + C cosh . (215) Hence the Lagrangian is
C
This curve is called catenary. The word catenary is de- m[ 2 2 ]
L= R ω + l2 (ω + θ̇)2 + 2Rlω cos θ(ω + θ̇) ,
rived from the Latin word for ”chain.” In 1669, Jungius 2
disproved Galileo’s claim that the curve of a chain hang-
which is equivalent to
ing under gravity would be a parabola. The equation was
obtained by Leibniz, Huygens, and Johann Bernoulli in m 2 2
L= l θ̇ + mRω 2 l cos θ.
1691 in response to a challenge by Jakob Bernoulli. 2
38
E. Jacobi’s Principle
Consider
L = L(q̇1 , . . . , q̇n , q1 , . . . , qn , t)
Let the Lagrangian does not involve the time explicitly. [E − V (r)]r4 = C 2 (r2 + r′2 ). (223)
The action can be presented as
∫ τ1 Problem E.1 * Analyze the relation between Eq. (223)
q′ q′ and Eq. (24).
S= L( 1′ , . . . , n′ , q1 , . . . , qn )t′ dτ,
τ0 t t
The time does not appear in the Jacobi Principle. It
where τ is some parameter. Similar to Eq. (217) we determines the path of the point in the configuration
obtain variational principle in the form space, not the motion in time. Yet this last problem
∫ t1 ∫ t1 ∫ τ1 ∑ can be solved by integrating Equation
′ ′ ′
δ [Lt − Et ]dτ = δ [L − E]t dτ = δ pi dqi = 0. dl
t0 t0 τ0 i dt = √ . (224)
2m(E − V )
Among all the trajectories starting at q0 and ending at
q1 and satisfying energy conservation law, the actual tra-
jectory is such that the integral F. Fermat’s Principle
∫ ∑
S0 = pi dqi (218) To explain the law of rectilinear propagation of light
i
in an optically homogeneous media, the law of specular
reflection and Snell’s law
is minimal. S0 is an abridged action and the statement
itself is called Maupertuis Principle. Taking into account n1 sin θ1 = n2 sin θ2 , (225)
that
∑ ∑ √ √ where n is the refractive index, Fermat postulated that
pi dqi = pi q̇i dt = 2T dt = 2mT dl = [2m(E − V )]dl,the particles of light travel in a media with the velocity
i i
(219) v = c/n, (226)
we obtain, that given initial and final points in space,
among all the trajectories satisfying energy conservation where c is the velocity of light in vacuum, and their tra-
law, the actual trajectory is such that jectory is such that the time of travel between two points
∫ q1 √ q) and q1 is minimal. Thus we immediately obtain Fer-
mat’s Principle which determines the shape of light ray
S0 = [2m(E − V )]dl (220)
q0 in a region of variable refractive index
∫ q1
is minimal. The statement itself is called Jacobi’s Prin-
δ n(r)dl = 0. (227)
ciple. q0
39
Consider, for example, the 2D problem with n = n(y). Lagrange Equations are invariant relative to such trans-
From the variational principle formation, that is Equations for the new variables
∫ √ ( )
δ n(y) 1 + y ′2 dx = 0 (228) d ∂L(Q̇, Q, t) ∂L(Q̇, Q, t)
− =0
dt ∂ Q̇i ∂Qi
we obtain the first integral of the Euler-Lagrange equa-
tion coincide with those for the old ones.
Hamilton’s Equations
n(y)
√ = C. (229) ∂H(p, q, t) ∂H(p, q, t)
1 + y ′2 q̇i = ; ṗi = − (234)
∂pi ∂qi
Taking into account that
are invariant relative to a transformation
1 dx
√ =√ = sin θ, (230) Qi = Qi (q1 , . . . qn ; p1 , . . . pn )
1 + y ′2 dx2 + dy 2
Pi = Pi (q1 , . . . qn ; p1 , . . . pn ), (235)
where θ is the angle between the light ray and the y axis
we see the geometrical meaning of Eq. (229): if there exists function H ′ (P, Q, t) such, that new vari-
ables satisfy equations
n(y) sin θ(y) = const. (231)
∂H ′ (P, Q, t) ∂H ′ (P, Q, t)
Q̇i = ; Ṗi = − . (236)
Let the interface y=const separates two regions with re- ∂Pi ∂Qi
fractive indices n1 and n2 . Then Eq. (231) is just Snell’s
law. In this case the transformation (235) is called canonical.
Transformation (235)is canonical if and only if there
Problem F.1 The refractive index n of a medium is a exist some functions H ′ and F such that
function only of the distance r from a fixed point O. ∑ ∑
* (a) Prove that the equation of a light ray, assumed to lie pi dqi − Hdt = Pi dQi − H ′ dt + dF. (237)
i i
in in a plane through O, traveling in the medium satisfies
(in polar coordinates) The reason lies in the fact that Hamilton equations are
( )2 Euler-Lagrange equations for the action considered as a
1 dr r2 n2 (r) functional in phase space
= −1
r2 dθ a2 n2 (a)
∫ t1 [∑ ]
where a is the distance of the ray from O at the point at S= pi q̇i − H(p, q, t) dt. (238)
which dr/dθ = 0. t0 i
** (b) If n = [1 + (α2 /r2 )]1/2 and the ray starts and ends
far from O, find the angle through which the ray is turned In fact, integrating by parts we obtain
if its minimum distance from O is a. ∫ t1 ∑ ( )
∂H ∂H
δS = δpi q̇i + pi δ q̇i − δpi − δqi dt
Comparing Jacobi and Fermat Principles we see that t0 i
∂pi ∂qi
the shape of light ray can be found from the solution of ∫ t1 ∑ [( ) ( ) ]
∂H ∂H
mechanical problem with the parameters = q̇i − δpi − ṗi + δqi dt
t0 i
∂pi ∂qi
V (r) ∼ −n(r)2 . t1
E = 0, (232) ∑
+ pi δqi (239)
.
i t0
XI. CANONICAL TRANSFORMATIONS
Addition to the integrand of a full derivative does not
A. Canonical Transformations change the Euler-Lagrange equations.
We have introduced Poisson brackets of two arbitrary The function G is called generator of the transformation.
functions of coordinates and momenta F and G as From Eq. (243) we obtain
∑n ( )
∂F ∂G ∂F ∂G ∂G(q, p, t)
[F, G] ≡ − . (276) δqi = δλ
∂qi ∂pi ∂pi ∂qi ∂pi
i=1
∂G(q, p, t)
If the function F does not depend explicitly upon time δpi = − δλ. (280)
∂qi
and
For example, translation in the direction OZ is generated
[F, H] = 0, (277) by the operator pz and rotation about the axis OZ (Eq.
(265)) is generated by the operator Jz = xpy − ypx .
then F is an integral of motion. From Eq. (275) we get Consider change of an arbitrary function of coordinates
dH ∂H and momenta F under transformation generated by G.
= . (278) From Eq. (280) we obtain
dt ∂t
∑n ( )
So if the Hamiltonian does not contain time explicitly, ∂F ∂F
δF = δqi + δpi
for example for a natural conservative system, it is an i=1
∂qi ∂pi
integral of motion. In this example the Hamiltonian has ∑n ( )
also the meaning of energy. ∂F ∂G ∂F ∂G
= − δλ ≡ [F, G] δλ.
Consider, however, spherical pendulum constrained to i=1
∂q i ∂p i ∂p i ∂qi
rotate about an axis. From the Lagrangian (63) we get
Let G is the transformation of symmetry
p2 1
H = θ 2 − ml2 ω 2 sin2 θ + mgl(1 − cos θ). (279) δH = [H, G] = 0,
2ml 2
Hamiltonian is not an energy, because the system is not and does not depend explicitly upon t. Then using Eq.
natural, but it is conserved. (275) and an obvious relation
[H, G] = − [G, H] ,
Problem E.1 For a one-dimensional system with the
Hamiltonian we obtain
2
p 1 dG
H= − 2 = 0,
2 2q dt
show that there is a constant of the motion D = pq
− Ht. that is G is conserved. For example, if Hamiltonian is
2
invariant with respect to spatial translations in the OZ
Problem E.2 * The Hamiltonian for two-dimensional direction, then pz = const, and if Hamiltonian is invari-
harmonic oscillator can be written as ant relative to rotations about OZ, then Jz = const.
1 2 1 2 Problem E.3 * Show that the Poisson brackets of the
H= (px + m2 ω 2 x2 ) + (p + m2 ω 2 y 2 ).
2m 2m y components of angular momentum are
Verify that the components of a symmetrical two- [Jx , Jy ] = Jz .
dimensional tensor A defined as
Interpret this result in terms of the transformation of one
1 component generated by another.
Aij = (pi pj + m2 ω 2 xi xj )
2m
are constants of motion.
F. Poisson Brackets and Canonical
The reason for the existence of an integral of motion Transformations
is the particular symmetry. The natural language for ex-
pressing a symmetry is the formalism of canonical trans- An approach to canonical transformations alternative
formations. The identity transformation is realized by to that based on generating functions uses Poison brack-
the function ets. Let us present Eq. (237) as
∑
F2 = qi Pi . ∑ ∑ ∂Qj ∑ ∂Qj
i
pi − Pj dqi − Pj dpi
i j
∂qi j
∂pi
Hence the infinitesimal canonical transformation is real-
ized by the function ∑ ∂Qj
+ H ′ − H − Pj dt = dF. (281)
F2 = qi Pi + G(q, P, t)δλ = qi pi + G(q, p, t)δλ. j
∂t
43
The idea of Hamilton was to use Eq. (290) with the C. Conservative System
appropriate initial (t → t0 ) conditions to find action and,
hence, the solution of the problem. For conservative system we may always look for S in
Jacobi understood that we can use any complete solu- the form
tion of the equation (290), that is a solution in the form:
S (q1 , . . . , qn , t) = W (q1 , . . . , qn ) − Et, (296)
S = S (q1 , . . . , qn , α1 , . . . , αn , t) .
where W (q1 , . . . , qn , α1 , . . . , αn−1 , E) is the solution of
where α1 , . . . , αn are arbitrary constants. Note that there the equation
are infinitely many such solutions, and action is just one
of them. Any such solution is called Hamilton’s Principal ( )
∂W ∂W
Function. H q1 , . . . , qn , ,..., = E, (297)
∂q1 ∂qn
Let us define functions qi (t) and pi (t) in the following
way: qi (t) are the solutions of the equations and is called Hamilton’s Characteristic Function. Eq.
(291) takes the form
∂S
= βi , i = 1, . . . , n (291)
∂αi ∂W ∂W
= βi , (i = 1, . . . , n − 1); − t = βn . (298)
where β1 , . . . , βn are arbitrary constants, and pi (t) are ∂αi ∂E
defined by simple differentiation p2
For example, for Hamiltonian H = 2m + V (x) we look
∂S for S in the form
pi = , i = 1, . . . , n. (292)
∂qi
S = W (x) − Et, (299)
Note, that to be able to solve Eq. (291) we should have
( 2 ) where W is the solution of the equation
∂ S ( )2
det ̸= 0.
∂αi ∂xj 1 dW
+ V (x) = E. (300)
2m dx
Below we prove that such defined q and p satisfy Hamil-
ton equations We get
∫ √
∂H ∂H
q̇j = ; ṗj = − . (293) W = 2m (E − V (x))dx. (301)
∂pj ∂pj
Using the fact that, due to Eq. (292), H(q, p, t) can be Substituting this into Eq. (296) and differentiating with
presented as H(q, α, t) we obtain. respect to E we obtain
( ) √ ∫
d ∂S ∂ ∂ ∂S m dx
0=
dt ∂αi
=
∂t
+ q̇j
∂qj ∂αi t= √ . (302)
2 (E − V (x))
∂2S ∂pj ∂H ∂pj
= + q̇j =− + q̇j Problem C.1 ** (a) Find explicitly the Hamilton’s
∂αi ∂t ∂αi ∂αi ∂αi
( ) Principal Function of the type (301) for linear harmonic
∂H ∂pj ∂pj ∂H ∂pj
=− + q̇j = q̇j − . (294) oscillator.
∂pj ∂αi ∂αi ∂pj ∂αi
(b) Looking at the action from the Problem A.1 of Sec-
Similarly tion X, can you suggest the Hamilton’s Principal Func-
( ) tion for the harmonic oscillator not of the type (296)?
dpi ∂ ∂ ∂S Check up that this function generates correct solution of
= + q̇j the problem.
dt ∂t ∂qj ∂qi
( ) ( ) ( )
∂H ∂H ∂pj
=− +
∂qi α ∂pj q ∂qi α D. Hamilton-Jacobi Theory and Canonical
( ) ( ) ( ) Transformations
∂H ∂H ∂pj
=− −
∂qi p ∂pj q ∂qi α
( ) ( ) ( ) Consider arbitrary Hamiltonian H (q, p, t) and make
∂H ∂pj ∂H
+ =− . (295) the canonical transformation with the generating func-
∂pj q ∂qi α ∂qi p tion
( )
Hence solutions of Eqs. (291) and (292) satisfy Eqs. P1 Pn
F2 (q, P, t) = S q1 , . . . , qn ; ̸ α1 , . . . , ̸ αn , t .
(293).
45
where S is the solution of Eq. (290). We obtain Differentiating with respect to E we get
√ ∫
H ′ = 0. m dr
t= √ . (312)
2 E − V (r) − 2mr
J2
The solution of the equations of motion 2
where W is the solution of Eq. (297), we get Problem E.1 * Solve the problem of the motion of a
point projectile in a vertical plane, using the Hamilton
H ′ = Pn . (304) Jacobi method. Find both the equation of the trajectory
and the dependence of the coordinates on time, assuming
The equations of motion have the form
the projectile is fired off at time t = 0 from the origin with
Ṗi = 0 the velocity v0 , making an angle α with the horizontal.
{
0 i = 1, . . . , n − 1
Q̇i = . (305)
1 i=n
F. Separation of Variables: General Case
The solution
Let Hamilton has the form
Pi = αi
{
βi i = 1, . . . , n − 1 H = H (f (q1 , p1 ) , q2 , . . . qn , p2 , . . . pn , t) . (314)
Qi = (306)
t + βn i = n
Then we can seek solution of Hamilton-Jacobi equation
being inserted in Eq. (243) gives us Eq. (298). in the form
with respect to period of motion, we obtain Problem B.2 ** For the small oscillations of a pendu-
( ∫ ) H ∂H dq lum whose length l is varying very slowly show that the
dE ∂H dλ 1 T ∂H dλ ∂λ ∂H dλ maximum angular displacement θmax ∝ l−3/4 . Hence
= = dt = H dq∂p . show that the maximum sideways displacement from the
dt ∂λ dt T 0 ∂λ dt dt
∂H
∂p vertical is ∝ l1/4 and that the maximum acceleration is
(336) ∝ l−3/4 . (Note that this last result implies, as l decreases
Putting p = p(q, E, λ) and differentiating with respect to slowly, an increasing risk for spaghetti eaters from sauce
λ equation detachment!)
H(q, p, λ) = E (337)
Problem B.3 ** A superball is bouncing vertically up
we have and down. It has a velocity v0 when it strikes the ground.
The acceleration due to gravity is slowly reduced by 10%
∂H ∂H ∂p
+ =0 (338) during a very long period of time. Assuming that the
∂λ ∂p ∂λ collisions of the ball with the ground are elastic, find the
or corresponding change in v0 .
∂H
∂p
∂λ
∂H
=− . (339) Problem B.4 ** A child of mass m on a swing rises
∂p
∂λ her center of mass by a small distance b every time the
swing passes the vertical position, and lowers her mass by
Hence we get the same amount at each extremal position. Assuming
H ∂p small oscillations, calculate the work done by the child
dE dλ ∂λ dq
=− H ∂p
(340) per period of oscillation. Show that the energy of the
dt dt ∂E dq swing grows exponentially according to dE/dt = αE and
or determine the constant α.
I ( )
∂p dE ∂p dλ
+ dq = 0, (341)
∂E dt ∂λ dt C. Action-Angle Variables in Separable Systems
which can be rewritten in the form
Suppose the problem is completely separable, that is
dI
= 0 =⇒ I = const. (342)
dt W = W1 (q1 , α1 . . . , αn−1 , E)+· · ·+Wn (qn , α1 . . . , αn−1 , E).
And the energy changes according to the law (348)
Let us introduce new momenta I1 , . . . , In by the gener-
E = H(I, λ). (343) ating function
Consider, for example, small oscillations of simple pen- F = W (q1 . . . , qn ; I1 . . . , In ), (349)
dulum.
ml2 2 p2 where W (I) is obtained from W (α) using equations
L= θ̇ − mglθ2 =⇒ H = θ 2 + mglθ2 . (344)
2 2ml I I
1 1 dWk
We have Ik = pk dqk = dqk = Ik (α1 . . . , αn−1 , E).
2π 2π dqk
√ (350)
g
E= I. (345) After the canonical transformation we obtain
l
So, when l changes adiabatically, H(I1 . . . , In ) = E(I1 . . . , In ). (351)
E ∼ l−1/2 . (346) The connection between new coordinates ϕi and old co-
ordinates qi is
Taking into account, that E = mglθ02 , we obtain
∂W
θ0 ∼ l−3/4 . (347) ϕi = . (352)
∂Ii
Problem B.1 * (a) A particle moves in periodic mo-
tion in one dimension under the influence of a potential During one period
V (x) = F |x|, where F is a constant. Using action-angle I I
variables find the period of the motion as a function of ∂ϕi ∂ ∂W
∆ϕi = dqk = dqk
the particle’s energy. ∂qk ∂Ii ∂qk
I
** (b) Suppose that the parameter F is slowly varied ∂ ∂Ik
= pk dqk = 2π = 2πδik (353)
from an initial value. What happens to the energy of the ∂Ii ∂Ii
particle? The amplitude of oscillation? The period?