Asp Dis2
Asp Dis2
Asp Dis2
Compression selection process is first conducted with the aid of figure 3.2.1.1 to
determine the most ideal compressor type for best performance.
Converting natural gas flow rate from m3/s to actual cubic feet per minute (ACFM):
𝑚3
1 = 2118.88 𝐴𝐶𝐹𝑀
𝑠
3
𝑚
50.3205 = 106623.1012 𝐴𝐶𝐹𝑀
𝑠
Interpolating figure 3.2.1.1 with natural gas flow rate determined in ACFM:
Figure A3.1.2: Discharge pressure (psig) vs inlet volume flow (ACFM) compressor selection chart ( Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2015)
Based on the interpolation done in the figure above, a multi-stage compressor operating
polytropically is selected.
The maximum duty of each compressor is limited to 2 MW thus the total work required
to compress natural gas from 10 barg to 37.9868 barg is determined using the equation
shown below:
𝑛−1
𝑅𝑇1 𝑛 𝑃2 𝑛
−𝑊 = 𝑍 [ − 1 ] ⋯ 𝐸𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 3.2.1.1
𝑀 𝑛 − 1 𝑃1
Where Z = Compressibility factor
R = universal gas constant, 8.314 JK-1mol-1
T1 = inlet temperature, K
M = molecular mass of gas, kg/kmol
W = Work done, J/kg
𝐶𝑃
𝛾 𝑐𝑎𝑛 𝑏𝑒 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑚𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑑 𝑓𝑟𝑜𝑚 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑙𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑠ℎ𝑖𝑝
𝐶𝑉
The efficiency of the compressor is first determined using figure 3.2.1.2. by interpolating
the volumetric flow rate of natural gas at 50.3205 m3/s.
Figure A3.1.3 Efficiency of compressor (%) vs volumetric flowrate at suction conditions (m3/s)
Given the mass flow rate of natural gas required for methanol synthesis is 38.5005 kg/s.
𝑘𝑔 𝐽
−𝑊𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 = 217207.2472 × 38.5005 = 8362587.6210 = 8.3626𝑀𝑊
𝑠 𝑠
The total work required to compress natural gas from 10 barg to 36.5 barg (37.5133bar)
is 8.3626 MW.
To reduce the temperature of the outlet stream when one compressor is used, the
compression work is done in two stages with an intercooler in between. This serves to
limit the discharge temperature of compressor to below 225℉ (approximately 107.2℃)
because system breakdown can potentially occur due to worn rings, formation of acids
and vaporization of oil in the lubrication system at temperature above 225℉ thereby
resulting in overheating of compressors. This can be explained by the actual discharge
valve’s temperature potentially reaching up to 75 ℉ hence increasing the actual
compressor’s discharge valve temperature to 300℉ (150℃) (theNEWS, 2002).
𝑃2 𝑃3
=
𝑃1 𝑃2
𝑃2 3751325
=
1101325 𝑃4
𝑃2 3751325
=
1101325 𝑃4
𝑷𝟐 = 𝟐𝟎𝟑𝟐𝟓𝟗𝟏. 𝟒𝟓𝟏𝟎 𝑷𝒂
Cooling water will be used to extract heat from the natural gas stream to reduce the
stream temperature entering the subsequent compressor down to approximately 40℃.
Intercooling between compressors are vital to generate energy and ultimately cost
savings as they serve to decrease the discharge temperature of the exiting stream thereby
reducing the amount of work done in compressing the natural gas stream ( Society of
Petroleum Engineers, 2015). The pressure drop across each heat exchanger is predicted
to be 0.5 bar.
Compressor 1
𝑊𝐶𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑟,1
𝐽 1.4961−1
8.314 × 298.15𝐾 1.4961 2032591.4510 𝑃𝑎 1.4961
= 0.9784 𝐾. 𝑚𝑜𝑙 [ − 1]
𝐾𝑔 1.4961 − 1 1101325𝑃𝑎
16.8837
𝐾𝑚𝑜𝑙
𝑘𝑚𝑜𝑙 𝐽
× 1000 = 97607.2578
𝑚𝑜𝑙 𝑘𝑔
Given the mass flow rate of natural gas required for methanol synthesis is 38.5005 kg/s.
𝐽 𝑘𝑔 𝐽
−𝑊𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 = 97607.2578 × 38.5005 = 3757928.2290 = 3.7579 𝑀𝑊
𝑘𝑔 𝑠 𝑠
= 3.76𝑀𝑊
The total work required to compress natural gas from 10 barg to 19.3127 barg (20.3260
bar) is 3.76MW.
Compressor 2
Taking into account a pressure drop of 0.5 bar across the intercooler, 𝑃2,𝑛𝑒𝑤 =
18.8127 𝑏𝑎𝑟.
𝑄𝐶𝑜𝑜𝑙𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑊𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑟
𝑚𝐶𝑜𝑜𝑙𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑊𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑟 =
𝐶𝑝, 𝐶𝑜𝑜𝑙𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑊𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑟 × (𝑇2 − 𝑇1 )
𝐽
4373177.898 𝑠
=
𝐽
4181.6 × (308.15 − 298.15)𝐾
𝑘𝑔. 𝐾
𝑘𝑔
= 104.5814
𝑠