Cancer during pregnancy: chemotherapy and radiotherapy are

safe for babies, studies suggest

Date: September 27, 2014

Article:
"When chemotherapy is administered after the first trimester of pregnancy, we cannot discern
any problems in the children," says lead author Dr Frederic Amant, KU Leuven and University
Hospitals Leuven in Belgium. "Fear about the risks of chemotherapy administration should not
be a reason to terminate a pregnancy, delay cancer treatment for the mother, or to deliver a baby
prematurely."

Concerns about the potential impact of cancer treatment on unborn children has until recently left
some oncologists hesitant to administer treatments to pregnant cancer patients, says Amant. To
address these concerns, his group has led three new studies presented at ESMO 2017.

In the first study, 38 children prenatally exposed to chemotherapy were recruited from the
International Network for Cancer, Infertility and Pregnancy (INCIP) registry and assessed for
mental development and cardiac health. Their outcomes were compared to 38 control children
who were not exposed to chemotherapy.

At a median age of almost two years of age, mental development as measured by the Mental
Development Index was in the normal range for both groups of children, and were not
significantly different. Cardiac dimensions and functions were within normal ranges for both
groups.

This is the first case control study on the developmental outcome of children exposed in utero to
chemotherapy. It shows that chemotherapy during pregnancy can be considered safe for mental
development and cardiac functioning of the child, the authors say.

Commenting on the results, Dr Fedro Alessandro Peccatori, Director of the Fertility &
Procreation Unit at the European Institute of Oncology's Division of Gynaecologic Oncology,
who was not involved in the study, said that these results confirm that chemotherapy
administration during pregnancy does not alter neurodevelopment after birth, nor cause cardiac
alterations.
"This paper points to the very important issue of long-term safety of prenatal exposure to
chemotherapy and reinforces the notion that chemotherapy during gestation does not endanger
the fetus and her or his subsequent development. To further ameliorate neonatal outcome, a
special effort should be made to prolong pregnancy duration, and stringent long-term follow-up
should be pursued to confirm these findings. Meanwhile, specific measures to support
prematurely delivered babies and their families should be implemented.

Future studies will explore the effects of specific chemotherapy types in detail, and longer term
follow-up, to fine tune the findings.

In a second study, Amant and colleagues explored the impact of radiotherapy on the children of
women with cancer.

The study included 16 children and 10 adults who had been exposed to radiotherapy in utero.
This is the first long-term follow-up study of children prenatally exposed to medical radiation,
and the study showed that neuropsychological, behavioral and general health outcomes for those
exposed to radiotherapy were within normal ranges. One child revealed a severe cognitive delay,
however other pregnancy-related complications are confounding factors, they report.

Amant hopes the new results will provide clinicians with the evidence they need to ensure
pregnant women with cancer receive the best quality care. "It's a good feeling to know that
research data can be implemented immediately into the clinic. Our data will inform physicians
and patients and help them to take decisions in a difficult situation."

Commenting, Peccatori noted that the long-term follow-up of children and adults whose mothers
have been treated with radiation therapy during gestation is an important topic. "The main
message is that neuropsychological, behavioral and general health outcomes were within the
normal range in all, but 3 of the 16 children studied. This is the first long-term follow-up study of
children and adults exposed to radiotherapy in utero. Pregnancy, particularly advanced
pregnancy, has been traditionally considered a contra-indication to radiotherapy. New radiation
techniques and more sophisticated simulations of the received fetal dose may change this
scenario, but caution remains mandatory when giving radiotherapy to a pregnant woman,
particularly in the third trimester."

Sentinel node biopsy safe for pregnant women with cancer It is safe and effective to check for
the spread of early breast cancer in pregnant women using sentinel node biopsy rather than
completely dissecting the node, researchers from the International Network of Cancer, Infertility
and Pregnancy and the German Breast Group have shown in another study presented at ESMO
2014 in Madrid.

Sentinel lymph node biopsies have been the topic of intensive research over the last 2 decades,
and have replaced the older and more invasive method of axillary lymph node dissection for
women patients without clinically suspicious axillary lymph nodes.

This method removes the first (or 'sentinel') lymph node receiving lymphatic drainage from the
tumour, therefore most likely to contain metastatic cells. If the SLN does not contain metastatic
disease, the remainder of the lymph nodes do not have to be removed, thereby sparing the patient
the associated side-effects such as lymphedema and reduced movement.

The latest guidelines for doctors still advise that they perform axillary lymph node dissection and
avoid sentinel lymph node biopsy during pregnancy, due to lack of safety data, explains Sileny
Han of University Hospitals Leuven, Belgium, who is presenting the results of a new study at
ESMO 2014. "We aim to add to the body of evidence that sentinel node biopsy is feasible during
pregnancy and should be considered an option."

This study is the largest series to date to assess this question. The researchers studied 97 women
with breast cancer who underwent sentinel node biopsy. Their aim was to assess whether the
sentinel lymph node procedure is safe from an oncologic point of view for the mother.

After a median follow-up of 35 months, eight patients had experienced a loco-regional relapse,
meaning their cancer recurred in the same or other breast, the chest wall, including two who
developed tumours in their lymph nodes. Four patients developed distant metastases, of whom
three died of breast cancer.

These results show that sentinel lymph node biopsy during pregnancy has a low axillary
recurrence rate, they write. "This staging method can be considered during pregnancy instead of
standard axillary lymph node dissection for early stage, clinically node negative breast cancer."

Adds Peccatori, co-author on this study: "Axillary staging in early breast cancer is a changing
paradigm. Data from different institutions in Europe and US have demonstrated that in non-
pregnant patients, sentinel node biopsy is an effective staging procedure that holds equivalent
results to axillary lymph node dissection even in patients with up to three positive sentinel nodes,
if post-operative systemic treatment is adequate. Furthermore, hand sentinel node biopsy is
associated with improved arm motility, decreased armpit pain and numbness and shorter hospital
stay. Why should we deny this procedure to pregnant breast cancer patients?"
Unplanned pregnancy during cancer treatment Another study from Amant's group shows the
importance of thinking about contraception during cancer diagnosis and cancer treatment. Sarah
van Peer and colleagues checked the database of the International Network for Cancer Infertility
and Pregnancy for women who became pregnant during cancer diagnosis or during treatment.

The INCIP database currently includes 1011 patients from 21 countries (at the time it included
897 patients). Overall, 3.23% (29/897) of the patients in the database became pregnant after
cancer diagnosis or during treatment. Of those 29 patients, three pregnancies were identified
during diagnostic examinations for suspected malignancy but before definite diagnosis, 18
during treatment, and seven after cancer diagnosis but before treatment was started.

"The core message from our results is that it is vital for doctors and patients to discuss
contraception during cancer diagnosis and cancer treatment. Although fertility issues are not the
focus of attention at this time, it is necessary to provide advice about contraception. And
although we know it's possible to treat patients with chemotherapy/radiotherapy during
pregnancy when necessary, it's still better to avoid this situation, if possible."

Says Peccatori, "Discussion about effective contraception remains a high priority for oncologists
dealing with young patients with cancer. The incidence of unplanned pregnancy during cancer
treatment probably remains a rare event. Nonetheless, the high emotional impact of an unplanned
pregnancy and the possible maternal consequences in terms of treatment modification should
prompt more effective interventions in this field."
Summary:
Children who are exposed to chemotherapy or radiotherapy while in the womb suffer no negative
impacts on mental or cardiac development, international studies have shown. “When
chemotherapy is administered after the first trimester of pregnancy, we cannot discern any
problems in the children,” says lead author of a study on the topic.
Learning Insight:
I learned that the very important issue of long-term safety of prenatal exposure to chemotherapy
and supports the conception that chemotherapy during gestation does not endanger the fetus and
her or his subsequent development. Chemotherapy during pregnancy can be considered safe for
mental development and cardiac functioning of the child.
New radiation techniques and more sophisticated simulations of the received fetal dose may
change this scenario, but caution remains mandatory when giving radiotherapy to a pregnant
woman, particularly in the third trimester.
I also learned that Sentinel node biopsy is safe for pregnant women with cancer It is safe and
effective to check for the spread of early breast cancer in pregnant women using sentinel node
biopsy rather than completely dissecting the node, researchers from the International Network of
Cancer, Infertility and Pregnancy and the German Breast Group have shown in another study
presented at ESMO 2014 in Madrid.
Sentinel lymph node biopsies have been the topic of intensive research over the last 2 decades,
and have replaced the older and more invasive method of axillary lymph node dissection for
women patients without clinically suspicious axillary lymph nodes.
This method removes the first (or 'sentinel') lymph node receiving lymphatic drainage from the
tumour, therefore most likely to contain metastatic cells. If the SLN does not contain metastatic
disease, the remainder of the lymph nodes do not have to be removed, thereby sparing the patient
the associated side-effects such as lymphedema and reduced movement.
"The core message from the results is that it is vital for doctors and patients to discuss
contraception during cancer diagnosis and cancer treatment. Although fertility issues are not the
focus of attention at the time, it is necessary to provide advice about contraception. And although
we know it's possible to treat patients with chemotherapy/radiotherapy during pregnancy when
necessary, it's still better to avoid this situation, if possible." Prevention is better than cure. So
that’s why it is important to foresee the possible outcomes, and if it is negative we should avoid
it, if is positive we can proceed. In this article they are doing the trial and error like method, but
the good thing is there research has mostly positive feedback. Which can help in treating
pregnant patients that has cancer.
RELATED
READING
IN
DELIVERY
ROOM
Submitted to: Ruby Lyn B. Padilla RN
Submitted by Abdelhafiz U. Susmiran