Prying Action for Slip-Critical Connections

with Bolt Tension and Shear Interaction

WILLIAM A. THORNTON and LARRY S. MUIR

ABSTRACT
Bolted connections subjected to both shear and tension must be checked for prying action and the interaction between tension, and shear
must be considered. The 2010 AISC Specification for Structural Steel Buildings (AISC 360-10) presents interaction equations both for bearing
connections and for slip-critical connections. This paper demonstrates two methods to account for tension and shear interaction when prying
action must be considered in slip-critical connections. The prying action procedure outlined in the 14th edition Steel Construction Manual is
assumed.

Keywords:  bolt tension, bolt shear, prying action, slip-critical connections.

INTRODUCTION BEARING-TYPE CONNECTIONS

W hen bolted connections subjected to both shear and

tension must be checked for prying action, the inter-
action between tension and shear must be considered. The
For bearing connections, the presence of shear reduces the
available tensile strength of the bolt. From Specification
Section J3.7, Equation J3-3a (for LRFD; repeated here as
AISC Specification for Structural Steel Buildings (AISC, Equation 2) calculates F′nt, the nominal tensile stress modi-
2010) presents interaction equations for bearing connections fied to include the effects of shear stress:
and for slip-critical connections. However, little guidance for
applying these equations to prying action analysis has been Fnt
Fnt′ = 1.3Fnt − frv ≤ Fnt (2)
available. This paper will demonstrate how these interac- ϕFnv
tion equations may be used in the prying action analysis pre-
sented in the 14th edition Steel Construction Manual (AISC, where
2011) by comparing two methods. This paper is formulated
Ab = the area of the bolt, in.2
in terms of Load and Resistance Factor Design (LRFD), but
the principles are similar for Allowable Strength Design Fnt = nominal bolt tensile stress from Table J3.2, ksi
(ASD).
Fnv = nominal bolt shear stress from Table J3.2, ksi
The 14th edition Steel Construction Manual outlines a
design approach for prying action on pages 9-10 through frv = required bolt shear shear stress, ksi
9-13. The quantity B is used to represent the available ten-
= Vu/Ab
sion strength per bolt. When there is no applied shear,
Substituting terms in Equation 1 and expanding terms incor-
B = ϕrt (1) porates F′nt (ksi) and the area of the bolt, Ab (in.), producing
Equation 3:
where ϕrt, the available tensile strength of the bolt, kips, is
given in Table 7-2 of the Manual or is calculated from Speci- B′ = ϕrt′ = ϕFnt′ Ab (3)
fication Section J3.1 and Table J3.2.
Note that ϕr′t represents the reduced available tensile strength
of the bolt, kips.

SLIP-CRITICAL CONNECTIONS
William A. Thornton, Corporate Consultant, Cives Engineering Corporation,
Roswell, GA (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected] For slip-critical connections, the situation is somewhat dif-
Larry S. Muir, Structural Steel Consultant, Atlanta, GA. E-mail: larrymuir@ ferent. When a tension is applied that reduces the net clamp-
larrymuir.com ing force, the factor ksc given by Specification Equation J3-5a
is applied to the available slip resistance per bolt. Rewriting

ENGINEERING JOURNAL / THIRD QUARTER / 2012 / 95

095-098_EJ3Q_2012_2010-28R.indd 95 6/5/12 3:06 PM

 Equation J3-5a for ksc in terms of required tension force per The slip-critical interaction Equation 4 may be math-
bolt (rather than total tension force) and applying the factor ematically rearranged to produce Equation 5:
to ϕr v produces Equation 4 for ϕr′v, the shear strength per
bolt reduced by the applied tension: ⎛ V ⎞
ϕrt′ = Te ⎜ 1 − u ⎟ ≤ min {ϕrt , Te } with Vu ≤ ϕrv (5)
⎝ ϕrv ⎠
⎛ T ⎞
ϕrv′ = ϕrv ⎜ 1 − u ⎟ with Tu ≤ min {ϕrt , Te } (4) where Vu is the applied shear per bolt, kips, and all other
⎝ Te ⎠
terms are as previously defined. Similar to Equation 3,
where B′ = ϕr′t; thus, Equation 5 produces the value B′ required for
prying action calculations.
Te = the expected mean pretension per bolt, kips In spite of its mathematical relationship to Equation 4,
= DuTb Equation 5 does not accurately represent the physical be-
havior of slip-critical connections. The reason that Specifi-
Tu = required tension force per bolt, kips cation Equation J3-5a (Equation 4 of this paper) is written
ϕr v = available shear strength per bolt for slip-critical in terms of a reduced shear stress is as follows: while Tu
connections, kips (Manual Table 7-3) affects slip-critical connection shear strength per bolt as
shown in Equation 4, applied shear, Vu, does not affect the
Tb = minimum bolt pretension, kips (Specification Table tensile strength of the bolt in quite the same manner, even
J3.1) though Equation 5 would indicate otherwise. The reason for
Du = calibration factor, usually 1.13 (Specification Sec- this lies in the physical behavior of slip-critical connections.
tion J3.8) Connection shear Vu is carried by the faying surface through
friction—rather than by the bolt shank as Equation 5 appears
In Equation 4, the limit on Tu is necessary because Te is to indicate—until slip occurs. Thus, the bolt itself “sees” no
less than ϕrt for ASTM A325 bolts with diameters larger shear until the connection slips, and its tensile strength is
than 1 in. This anomaly occurs because the 2010 Specifica- consequently unaffected until slip. Once slip occurs, bearing
tion uses a minimum specified tensile strength of 120 ksi for interaction Equation J3-3a from the Specification and Equa-
all ASTM A325 bolt diameters. However, the ASTM A325 tions 2 and 3 of this paper must be used.
standard uses 120 ksi for bolts up to and including 1-in. di-
ameter and then uses 105 ksi for larger bolts. The preten- SOLUTION STRATEGIES
sion values (Tb) in Specification Table J3.1 are based on the
ASTM values, while Specification Table J3.2 uses 120 ksi Method A.  Use the mathematically inverted Specification
“across-the-board” for all ASTM A325 bolt diameters. The Equation J3-5a, rearranged as Equation 5, to solve for B′ for
difference occurs only for ASTM A325 bolts; for ASTM use in prying action calculations:
A490 bolts, both Table J3.1 and Table J3.2 are based on the
ASTM minimum tensile strength value of 150 ksi. ⎛ Vu ⎞
B′ = ϕrt′ = Te ⎜ 1 − ⎟ ≤ min {ϕrt , Te }
Note that in Specification Table J3.2, the values of Fnt are ⎝ ϕrv ⎠
75% of the bolt tensile strength Fu. Thus, for ASTM A325
bolts, Fnt = 0.75 × 120 ksi = 90 ksi and for ASTM A490 As previously discussed, this approach does not capture
bolts, Fnt = 0.75 × 150 ksi = 113 ksi. The factor 0.75 is the the physical behavior of the connection because it does
ratio of the threaded area to the shank area. not account for the pre-slip condition. However, Equation
For bearing connections, Equation 3 produces a reduced 5 provides a conservative solution. This approach has been
available tensile strength, ϕr′t, due to the presence of shear, previously presented the literature by Thornton (1985),
Vu. For slip-critical connections, Equation 4 produces a re- Brockenbrough (2006) and Tamboli (2010).
duced shear strength, ϕr′v, due to the presence of applied bolt
Method B.  Account for pre-slip and post-slip behavior as
tension, Tu.
follows:
Note that in Equation 4, Tu does not include the prying
force, q. The reason for this is that the total faying surface Step 1 Calculate the slip-critical shear strength as reduced
compression force is not reduced by q. The bolt tension, Tu, by the applied tension, using Equation 4:
is increased by q, but an equal and opposite q acts as an ad-
ditional compression force on the faying surface. Thus, the ⎛ T ⎞
slip-critical shear resistance—while reduced by the applied ϕrv′ = ϕrv ⎜ 1 − u ⎟ with Tu ≤ min {ϕrt , Te }
tension, Tu —is unaffected by the prying force, q. ⎝ Te ⎠

96 / ENGINEERING JOURNAL / THIRD QUARTER / 2012

095-098_EJ3Q_2012_2010-28R.indd 96 6/5/12 3:06 PM

 Step 2 If ϕr′v < Vu, the slip-critical shear strength is insuf- Tu = 22.0 kips ≤ 40.6 kips OK

ficient and the connection fails.
⎛ 22.0 kips ⎞
Step 3 If ϕr′v ≥ Vu, the connection is in the “pre-slip” state. ϕrv′ = 11.2 kips ⎜ 1 − ⎟
Use Equations 2 and 3 to calculate B′ for the post- ⎝ 44.1 kips ⎠
slip state (bearing): = 5.56 kips/bolt

B′ = ϕrt′ = ϕFnt′ Ab
Step 2 ϕrv′ = 5.56 kips ≥ Vu = 5.56 kips OK to proceed
F
Fnt′ = 1.3Fnt − nt frv ≤ Fnt Step 3 Calculate F′nt using Equation 3:
ϕFnv
Fnt
Fnt′ = 1.3Fnt − frv ≤ Fnt
Once the value B′ is determined, the calculations follow ϕFnv
the process outlined in the 14th edition Manual for both
90 ksi ⎛5.56 kips/bolt ⎞
methods. = 1.3 ( 90 ksi ) −
( 0.75)( 54 ksi ) ⎜⎝ 0.601 in.2 ⎟⎠
EXAMPLE = 96.4 ksi

Given:  ASTM A325 bolts, d-in. diameter, slip-critical, Fnt′ = 96.4 ksi > Fnt = 90 ksi
Class A faying surface, oversize holes, threads included in
Use Fnt′ = 90 ksi.
the shear plane. Vu = 5.56 kips/bolt and Tu = 22.0 kips/bolt.
Du = 1.13 from Specification Section J3.8 Calculate B′ using Equation 2:
Tb = 39 kips from Specification Table J3.1 B′ = ϕrt′ = ϕ Fnt′ Ab

Te = Du × Tb = 1.13 × 39 = 44.1 kips (

= ( 90 ksi )( 0.75 ) 0.601 in.2 )
ϕr v = 11.2 kips from Manual Table 7-3 = 40.6 kips/bolt ≤ ϕrt = 40.6 kips/bolt OK

Fnv = 54 ksi from Specification Table J3.2
Use B′ = 40.6 kips/bolt.
ϕrt = 40.6 kips from Manual Table 7-2
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
Fnt = 90 ksi from Specification Table J3.2
Method A gives B′ = 22.2 kips/bolt while Method B gives
Solution A: B′ = 40.6 kips/bolt. Method A is conservative but does not
capture the pre-slip/post-slip phenomenon. Method B cap-
From Equation 5,
tures the pre-slip/post-slip phenomenon and is less conserva-
⎛ V ⎞ tive. The authors recommend the use of Method B because
B′ = ϕrt′ = Te ⎜ 1 − u ⎟ it is based on a mathematical model that more closely re-
⎝ ϕrv ⎠
sembles the connection behavior.
⎛ 5.56 kips ⎞ Kulak et al. (1987) indicate that, at ultimate loads, the ef-
B′ = 44.1 kips ⎜ 1 − ⎟ fects of prying will be the same regardless of whether the
⎝ 11.2 kips ⎠ bolts are pretensioned or not. This observation further sup-
= 22.2 kips/bolt ≤ ϕrt = 40.6 kips/bolt OK ports the use of Method B. Another observation by the au-
thors of this paper suggests that Method B may also prove
Use B′ = 22.2 kips/bolt.
to be overly conservative in practice. This point is easiest to
see if we transition to ASD and look at service loads. Speci-
Solution B:
fication Equation J3-1 calculates the tensile strength of bolts
Step 1 Check Equation 4: using Ω = 2.00. Tension service loads, Ta, must satisfy the
⎛ T ⎞ following:
ϕrv′ = ϕrv ⎜ 1 − u ⎟ with Tu ≤ min {ϕrt , Te }
⎝ Te ⎠ Rn Fnt Ab 0.75Fu Ab
Ta ≤ = = = 0.375Fu Ab
Tu ≤ min {ϕrt , Te } Ω Ω 2.00

≤ min {40.6 kips, 44.1 kips} = 40.6 kips The specified pretension values from Specification Table
J3.1 are approximately 70% of the tensile strength of the

ENGINEERING JOURNAL / THIRD QUARTER / 2012 / 97

095-098_EJ3Q_2012_2010-28R.indd 97 6/5/12 3:06 PM

 bolt: Tb ≈ 0.70Fu Ab. Thus, at service loads the applied ten- Brockenbrough, R.L., editor (2006), Structural Designer’s
sion—limited to 0.375Fu Ab —is less than the tensile strength Handbook, 4th edition, Chapter 3, L.S. Muir and W.A.
of the bolt—0.70Fu Ab —and the bearing behavior reflected Thornton, p. 3.93, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.
in Equation 3 will never occur. This is true for both the ASD Kulak, G.L., Fisher, J.W. and Struik, J.H.A. (1987), Guide
and LRFD design approaches. Further study is necessary to Design Criteria for Bolted and Riveted Joints, 2nd edi-
to establish how—or if—this reality should be incorporated tion, Section 17.3, Wiley-Interscience, New York, NY.
into the design process.
Tamboli, A., editor (2010), Handbook of Structural Steel
Connection Design and Details, 2nd edition, Chapter
REFERENCES
2, L.S. Muir, W.A. Thornton and T. Kane, pp. 163-164,
AISC (2010), Specification for Structural Steel Buildings, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.
ANSI/AISC 360-10, American Institute of Steel Con- Thornton, W.A. (1985), “Prying Action—A General Treat-
struction, Chicago, IL. ment,” Engineering Journal, Vol. 22, No. 2, American
AISC (2011), Steel Construction Manual, 14th edition, Institute of Steel Construction, Chicago, IL.
American Institute of Steel Construction, Chicago, IL.

98 / ENGINEERING JOURNAL / THIRD QUARTER / 2012

095-098_EJ3Q_2012_2010-28R.indd 98 6/5/12 3:06 PM