sensors: γγγγ-radiation Sensor Using Optical and Electrical Properties of
sensors: γγγγ-radiation Sensor Using Optical and Electrical Properties of
sensors: γγγγ-radiation Sensor Using Optical and Electrical Properties of
sensors
ISSN 1424-8220
© 2002 by MDPI
http://www.mdpi.net/sensors
Abstract: Manganese phthaloyanine polymer thick films were fabricated using screen-
printing techniques. The optical parameters were obtained from the analysis of the
absorption spectra over a wavelength range of 385-900nm. The d.c. electrical measurements
were carried out in a range of 0-30 volts. The effects of γ-radiation on the optical and the
electrical properties were investigated for dosimetry applications. The optical energy band
gaps of these films showed a decrease in their values with the increase in the radiation dose.
The electronic transition has changed from direct allowed for the as-printed films
(unexposed to γ-rays) to indirect allowed for the irradiated samples. Both the as-printed and
irradiated Ag/MnPc/Ag devices demonstrated a Schottky conduction mechanism. Both the
absorbance and the capacitance of the MnPc thick films displayed a highly consistent linear
response to γ-ray exposure.
Introduction
It is well-known that the exposure of solid materials to γ-rays induces structural defects known as
colour centres. The presence of such colour centres in a thick film matrix gives rise to changes in both
the optical and electrical properties of the material, which can be utilised to assess the radiation dose
absorbed [14-19].
Several absorbance spectra for MnPc thick films exposed to various irradiation doses are illustrated
in Figure 1. The lower spectrum is that of the as-printed sample and the upper six spectra are for those
exposed to different doses of γ-rays. It was observed that the increase in γ-radiation dose caused an
increase in the optical density and also a shift in the spectrum towards higher wavelengths. For
instance, when the as-printed MnPc thick films were exposed to a dose of 25 kGy, the following
changes were observed:
1) The centre of the B-band shifted from 385 nm to 396 nm while the absorbance is increased from
2.45 to 3.29.
2) The Q-band also displayed a similar shift from 756 nm to 786 nm with an increase in
absorbance from 1.06 to 1.60.
Further exposure to γ-rays resulted in an even higher absorbance and a greater shift in the
UV/Visible spectrum up to a dose of 28 kGy, at which saturation point was reached.
The absorbance of both the B and Q bands increased linearly when exposed to γ-ray doses in the
range between 7 kGy - 25 kGy in steps of 3.6 kGy (Figure 2).
Figure 1. MnPc absorbance spectra display an increase in the absorbance as the γ-ray dose
increases. There exists a shift to higher wavelengths as the radiation dose is increased.
Sensors 2002, 2 176
Figure 2. Both B-band and Q-band displayed a linear increase in absorbance in a dose range
of 7– 25 kGy.
Figure 3. The transitions of the as-printed MnPc thick films. The best straight line is revealed
by curve (1) indicating a direct allowed transition.
Figure 3 represent plots of the four possible optically induced electronic transitions for the
manganese-phthalocyanine polymer thick film; a) direct allowed transition, b) indirect allowed
Sensors 2002, 2 177
transition, c) direct forbidden transition and d) indirect forbidden transition. These transitions were
obtained by analysing the absorption edge of the B-band in view of the models proposed by Mott and
Davis [20]:
a (ν ) hν = B ( hν - Eopt )m (1)
Where,α(ν) = 2.303 A/d (A is the absorbance and d is the film thickness), h: Plank’s constant, ν: the
frequency of the incident photons, B: constant obtained from the slope of the (αhν) m versus
hν (Figures 3 & 4), Eopt: optical energy band gap and m = 1/2, 3/2, 2 or 1/3 for direct allowed, direct
forbidden, indirect allowed and indirect forbidden transitions respectively.
Figure 4. The effects of γ-rays on the electronic transition of MnPc thick films: The best
straight line is revealed by curve (4) indicating a indirect allowed transition.
In Figure 3, the only satisfactory straight line fit for (αhν)2 as a function of hν is displayed by curve
(1). This indicates that the direct allowed transition is the predominant transition for the as-printed
MnPc thick films. A similar result has been reported for thin film structures by Rajeh and Menon [4].
However, the indirect electronic transition has been established for the irradiated samples as shown by
curve (4) of Figure 4. The change in type of the electronic transitions may be attributed to the increase
in the density of traps caused by the exposure to γ-rays, which in turn, increased the disorder. Such
increase in structural disorder is indicated by the increase in the width of the tail of the localised states
(Ee) from 0.50 eV for the as-printed thick film to 0.55, 0.62, 0.73, 0.78, 0.88 and 0.98 eV when
exposed to doses of 7.2, 10.8, 14.4, 18.0, 21.6 and 25.2 kGy respectively.
Sensors 2002, 2 178
The energy values of the optical band gap for MnPc thick films were calculated by assuming the
direct allowed transition for the as-printed thick films (m = ½) and indirect allowed transition for the
irradiated samples (m=2). Therefore, equation (1) was modified to the forms below:
a (ν ) ⋅ hν = B ⋅ ( hν - Eopt )2 (3)
The energy value of the absorption edge for the as-printed MnPc thick films was ~ 2.59 eV, which
is much lower than the values of 3.14-3.25 eV reported for thin films by Rjesh and Menon [4]. The
large difference in energy was attributed to the effect of film thickness on the optical band gap by
Ismail etal [21], when investigating various compositions of SiO/Nb2O5 and Nb2O5. They observed
that the energy of the optical band gap decreased as the film thickness was increased.
Figure 5 shows plots of (αhν) 2 versus hν for as-printed and irradiated films. It is evident from the
curves that the values of the optical band gap has decreased from 2.59 eV for as-printed MnPc to 2.49
eV for films exposed to γ-ray dose of 25.2 kGy. This was attributed to the increase in the disorder
caused by the presence of structural defects, which is known to increase the width of the localised
states, thus reduce the value of the optical gap [3, 20, 21].
Figure 5. The extrapolations of straight lines for which (αhν)1/2 = 0.0 display the radiation
induced decrease in the optical band gap.
The current-voltage (I-V) characteristics are shown in Figure 6 for MnPc thick film exposed to γ-
ray doses ranging from 7 to 25 kGy. There is only one distinct region throughout a voltage range of 0-
30 volts for each characteristic curve: at both low and high voltages the slope of I versus V plot was
Sensors 2002, 2 179
much less than unity indicating the absence of the power-law dependence and the presence of the
electrode to bulk-limited effect in the Ag/MnPc contact.
Figure 6. The I-V characteristics curves display a linear relationship indicting bulk-limited
conduction mechanism for the as-printed and irradiated thick films.
Further analysis is provided by Figure 7, where plots of log(I) versus V1/2 characteristics are
displayed. There are two distinct regions for each curve: at voltages lower than 1 volt the current is
thickness-independent and rises sharply displaying the electrode-limited region. However, at voltages
higher than 1 volt the electron transport is bulk-limited and the effect of MnPc thickness is manifested
by the insignificant increase in the current. The bulk-limited conduction mechanism is governed by the
following equation:
β E1
-exp
I c =α 2/kT
(4)
where, Ic: the circulating current, E: the applied electric field, k: Bolzmann’s constant, T: the
absolute temperature (K), β: the high field-lowering coefficient.
It is also experimentally possible to distinguish between both types of the bulk-limited conduction
mechanism: Poole-Frenkel and Richardson-Schottky conductions using the relative permittivity
values. The permittivity values listed in Table I for the MnPc films, were obtained from both direct
measurement using an impedance analyser (HP 4277A LCZ-meter) and estimated by using the high-
field lowering coefficients (β) as follows:
e3
εr = (5)
mπε o β 2
Sensors 2002, 2 180
Figure 7. log(I) versus V1/4 for MnPc thick film: all films show electrode-limited at low
voltages and bulk-limited at high voltages.
The relative permittivity values listed in Table I, namely, columns (1) and (3) are within the range
of (2.4-5.1) as reported by several workers for phthalocyanine thin film materials [13, 22-25]. Both
columns are highly consistent indicating the predominance of Schottky conduction mechanism for the
Ag/MnPc interface.
Relative Permittivity
High-Field Lowering
γ-Ray Exposure Measured Poole-Frenkel Schottky
Coefficient β ×10-5
Dose (kGy) LCZ-meter Effect Emission
(eV V-1/2cm1/2)
(1) (2) (3)
0.0 70 2.5 12.36 2.6
7.2 75 2.8 11.57 3.11
10.8 78 3.2 10.83 3.3
14.4 84 3.6 10.23 3.5
18.0 89 3.9 9.49 3.8
21.6 95 4.2 9.13 4.05
25.2 101 4.6 8.52 4.44
Sensors 2002, 2 181
The effects of γ-radiation on the capacitance (C) of Ag/MnPc/Ag devices under different voltages
is presented in Figure 8. The samples showed no significant changes when they were exposed to γ-ray
dose below 7.2 kGy. However, when the dose was increased, the capacitances of the MnPc samples
were decreased. Further exposure to γ-radiation led to a continuous decrease in capacitance values until
reaching saturation dose beyond 25.2 kGy. In Figure 9, linear relationships between the ∆C/Co and γ-
ray dose (D) are shown for different working voltages where ∆C C o = (C o − C ) C . In addition,
continuous linear changes in the capacitance of the Ag/MnPc/Ag were recorded for γ-ray dose
exposure ranging within 7.2-25 kGy suggesting the suitability of using screen-printed MnPc thick
films for high dose dosimeters.
Figure 8. The decrease in the capacitance as with the increase in γ-ray dose.
The MnPc polymer thick films are comparable in properties and dosimetry range to the thin dyed-
plastic dosimeter investigated by Abdel-Rehim etal [26]. The advantage of MnPc thick film over the
thin dyed-plastic is that the former is a heat stable upto temperature of 200 oC (the melting point of the
binding polymer) while the latter is unstable at a temperature of 60 oC or higher.
Sensors 2002, 2 182
Figure 9. Linear relationships between ∆C/Co and γ-ray dose at different voltages.
Experimental
Capacitive devices were fabricated using polymer thick-film technology. The dielectric layer
consisted of a polymer paste, which was made from 90% MnPc and 10% Polyvinyl Butyral (PVB) by
weight, with Butyl Carbitol (Diethylenglycol-monobutylether) being the main solvent. Conductive
DuPont 4929 silver was used as contacts on both sides of the dielectric layers of MnPc thick film. All
layers were printed using a DEK 1202 automatic screen printer with a 325-mesh stainless steel screen
at an angle of 45° to the frame. Thicker films having a thickness of 60 µm were fabricated for the
Ag/NiPc/Ag devices by successively printing layers of MnPc paste on top of each other. Each printed
layer was dried in a curing oven. This thickness was verified by following a standard procedure using
an optical microscope [27].
Several Ag/MnPc/Ag devices were fabricated in an MIM (Metal-Insulator-Metal) structure with an
active area of 1.0 cm x 1.0 cm. Simple ohmic circuit was constructed for measurements of I-V
characteristics. An impedance analyser (HP 4277A LCZ-meter) was used to measure the capacitance
of both as-deposited and irradiated devices under an excitation frequency of 500 Hz.
In the case of optical measurements a thickness of 15µm was sufficient. The UV/Visible spectra
were recorded for the as-printed and irradiated samples at room temperature using a Varian DMS-100S
Sensors 2002, 2 183
UV-visible spectrometer. The samples were independently exposed to doses of γ-radiation (7.2-25.2
kGy) from a 137Cs source at a dose rate of 6.0 Gy/min.
Conclusion
The optical and electrical properties of screen-printed Manganese-Phthalocyanine thick films were
investigated before and after exposure to γ-radiation, to explore the possibility of their use in dosimetry
applications. A satisfactory straight line fit was shown by (αhν) 2 as a function of hν for the as-printed
MnPc thick films, which indicated the predominance of a direct allowed transition within the band gap.
The (αhν) 1/2 versus hν revealed the best straight line for the irradiated samples indicating the
predominance of the indirect allowed transition. In addition, continuous linear changes in both the
optical absorbance and the capacitance of the Ag/MnPc/Ag were recorded for γ-ray dose exposure
ranging within 7.2-25 kGy suggesting the suitability of sreen-printed MnPc thick films for dosimetry
applications.
1. Arshak, A.; Zleetni, S. M.; Arshak, K. I.; Harris, J. Proc. IEEE-NANO 2001, Maui, Hawaii, USA,
28-30 October, 2001, 238-243.
2. Arshak, A.; Zleetni, S. M.; Arshak, K. I.; Harris, J. Proc. IEEE-23rd International Conference on
Microelectronics, Nis, Yugoslavia, 12-15 May 2002.
3. Arshak, A.; Zleetni, S. M.; Arshak, K. I.; Harris, J. Proc. IEEE-23rd International Conference on
Microelectronics, Nis, Yugoslavia, 12-15 May 2002.
4. Rajesh, K. R.; Menon, C. S. Materials Letters 2001, 51, 266-269.
5. Gravano, S.; Hassan, A.K.; Gould, R.D. Int. J. Electronics 1991, 70, 477-484.
6. Amer, N.; Gould, R.D.; Saleh, A.M. Vacuum 1998, 50, 53-56.
7. Guttman, F.; Lyons, L. E. Organic Semiconductor, A.Kriegers, Malabar, 1981.
8. Leznoff, C. C.; Lever, A.B.P. Phthalocyanines: Properties and Applications, 3, VCH, New York,
1993.
9. Ambily, S.; Menon, C. S. Thin Solid Films 1999, 347, 284-288.
10. Nalwa, H. S.; Kakuta, A. Thin Solid Films 1995, 254, 218-223.
11. Hassan, A.K.; Gould, R.D. Int. J. Electronics 1990, 69,11-17.
12. Hoshi, H.; Dann, H.; Marayama, Y. J. Appl. Phys. 1990, 67, 1845-1849.
13. Gould, R. D. 1985, 125, 63-69.
14. Christman, J. R. Fundamentals of Solid State Physics, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1988.
15. Knoll, G. Radiation Detection and Measurement, 2nd ed, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1989.
16. Holmes-Siedle, A.; Adams, L. Handbook of Radiation Effects, Oxford University Press, Oxford,
U.K., 1994.
17. Dearnaley, G.; Northrop, D. C. Semiconductor Counters for Nuclear Radiations, E. & F. N. Spon
Ltd., London, U.K., 1966.
18. Evans, R. D. The Atomic Nucleus, Robert E. Krieger Publications. Co., Malabar, Florida, USA
1955.
Sensors 2002, 2 184
19. Krane, S. K. Introductory Nuclear Physics, John Wiley & sons, ” New York, 1988.
20. Mott, N F.; Davis, E A Electronic Process in Non-crystalline Materials, 2nd ed, Clarendon Press,
Oxford, UK, 1979.
21. Al-Ismail, J. S. A. Y.; Arshak, K.; Hogarth, C. A. Phys. Stat. Sol. (A) 1985, 89, 363-374.
22. Sussman, A. J. Appl. Phys. 1967, 38, 2738-2748.
23. Hamann, C. Phys. Status Solidi 1968, 26, 311-318.
24. Gould, R. D. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 1986, 9, 1785-1790.
25. Delcote, G. M.; Fillard, J. P.; Marco, F. J. Solid State Commun. 1964, 2, 373-376.
26. Abdel-Rehim, F.; Ebraheem, S.; Wei-Zhen Ba; Mclaughlin, W. L. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 1992, 43,
1503-1510.
27. Prudenziati, M. (ed.), Handbook of Sensors and Actuators: Thick Film Sensors, Elsevier Science B.
V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1994.