Reading Part A Appendicitis
Reading Part A Appendicitis
Reading Part A Appendicitis
The first report of an appendectomy (also called appendicectomy) came from Amyan, a surgeon of
the English army. Amyan performed an appendectomy in 1735 without anaesthesia to remove a
perforated appendix. Reginald H. Fitz, an anatomopathologist at Harvard who advocated early
surgical intervention, first described appendicitis in 1886. Because he was not a surgeon, his
advice was ignored for a time.
Then, at the end of the 19th century, the English surgeon H. Hancock successfully performed the
first appendectomy in a patient with acute appendicitis. Some years after this, the American C.
McBurney published a series of reports that constituted the basis of the subsequent diagnostic and
therapeutic management of acute appendicitis.
Text 3 Statistics
The incidence of acute appendicitis is around 7% of the population in the United States and in
European countries. In Asian and African countries, the incidence of acute appendicitis is probably
lower because of the dietary habits of the inhabitants of these geographic areas.
In the last few years, a decrease in frequency of appendicitis in Western countries has been
reported, which may be related to changes in dietary fibre intake. In fact, the higher incidence of
appendicitis is believed to be related to poor fibre intake in such countries.
Persons of any age may be affected, with the highest incidence occurring during the second and
third decades of life. Rare cases of neonatal and prenatal appendicitis have been reported.
Appendicitis occurs more frequently in males than in females, with a male-to-female ratio of 1.7:1.
Text 4 Prospective randomized comparison of open versus
laparoscopic appendectomy in men.
Abstract
A prospective, randomized trial was performed to compare open appendectomy with laparoscopic
appendectomy in men with a clinical diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Sixty-four patients with a median
age of 25 years (range 18-84 years) were randomized to open appendectomy (n = 31) or laparoscopic
(n = 33) appendectomy. Of the 64 men, 56 (87.5%) had appendicitis (27 open, 29 laparoscopic
procedures). The mean operating times were 50.6 +/- 3.7 minutes (+/- SEM) for open and 58.9 +/- 4.0
minutes for laparoscopic appendectomy (p = 0.13). Five (15%) patients randomized to laparoscopic
appendectomy had an open operation. The mean postoperative hospital stay was significantly longer for
open appendectomy (3.8 +/- 0.4 days) than for laparoscopic appendectomy (2.9 +/- 0.3 days) (t = 2.
05,df = 62,p = 0.045). The complication rate after open appendectomy (25.8%) was higher than after
laparoscopic appendectomy (12.1%). There was a single postoperative death due to a pulmonary
embolus in the laparoscopic group and a single death due to cardiac and renal failure in the open group.
The mean time to return to normal activities was significantly longer following open appendectomy (19.7
+/- 2.4 days) than after laparoscopic appendectomy (10.4 +/- 0.9 days), (t = 3.75,df = 49,p = 0.001). In
conclusion, laparoscopic appendectomy in men has significant advantages in terms of a more rapid
Appendicitis
Summary Task
10
11
12
13
14
The vermiform (1) is a worm-like extension of the (2) , and is on average 8 –
10 cm in (3). The presence of lymphoid (4) in the (5) is a characteristic
feature, and more of these develop during later (6) and adolescence.
(à next page)
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Nowadays, there are (22) types of operations that can be done – (23) or
laparoscopic appendectomy. Either procedure is suitable for most patients,
with a recent study at (24), South Australia, showing only a slightly (25)
operating time with laparoscopy, but significantly (26) time in hospital.
Furthermore, the time taken to return to (27) after open operation was almost
20 days, compared to only slightly (28) days in the laparoscopic group.