Behaviorism Framework: The Definition of Behaviorism
Behaviorism Framework: The Definition of Behaviorism
Behaviorism Framework: The Definition of Behaviorism
Framework
The greatest contribution of B.F Skinner was known his studies of how rewards
and punishment influence behavior(Fisher,202 as cited in Waltman :2003). He
taught that reinforcement follows behavior. Human behavior is developed by
previous situations and reinforcements. Behavior enlarges in areas that are
positively reinforced, therefore, we should be controlling, creating events that
reinforce desired behavior. Skinner used a tool which was known the ”Skinner
box”. This box was used to observe behavior in tested situations and for operant
conditioning experiment. For example Operant conditioning( as cited in
Strandrige) is the mouse pushes the lever and receives a food reward.
Therefore, he will push the lever repeatedly in order to get the treat. It means
that the mouse can response to the stimuli well so, the mouse can get reward in
the form of treat .Through his experiment he concluded that behavior could be
changed by providing reinforcement based upon the response.
The principles of operant conditioning (as cited in
Demirezeen(1988:137))
1. Behaviorist theory dwells on spoken languageà learning language is
primarily what is spoken and secondarily what is written.
2. Behaviorist theory is the habit formation theory of language teaching and
learning, reminding us the learning of structural grammarà Language learning
concerns us by “not problem-solving but the information and performance of
habits”
3. The stimulus-response chain, S-Responseà emphasizes conditioning and
building from the simplest conditioned responses to more and more complex
behaviors.
4. All learning is the establishment of habits as the result of reinforcement
and rewardà positive reinforcement is reward, negative reinforcement is
punishment.
5. The learning, due to its socially-conditioned nature, can be the same for
each individual à each person can learn equally if the condition in which the
learning takes are the same for each person.
CLASSICAL VS OPERANT CONDITIONING based on (Cherry,2008)
Classical conditioning
First described by Ivan Pavlov, a Russian psychologist
Involves placing a neutral signal before a reflex
Focuses on involuntary response and stimulus
Operant conditioning
First described by B.F Skinner, an American psychologist
Involves applying reinforcement or punishment after a behavior
Focuses on a voluntary behavior and consequence
THE STRENGTH AND WEAKNESS OF BEHAVIORISM
The next section that will be discussed is the strength and weakness of
behaviorism(As cited in Mergel:1998)
• Specify the desired performances in advance (the learning outcomes serve this
purpose) and verify learning with appropriate assessments
Behaviorism
Students tend to be passive
The teacher is active in teaching learning process than the students since
the teacher presents and provides for practice and feedback.
The material is prepared by the teacher.
(2) Arrange practice situations in which prompts are paired with the target stimuli
that initially have no eliciting power but which will be expected to elicit the
responses in the natural setting,
Behaviorism Overview
Behaviorism is more concerned with behavior than with thinking, feeling, or knowing. It
focuses on the objective and observable components of behavior. The behaviorist theories all
share some version of stimulus-response mechanisms for learning. Behaviorism originated
with the work of John B. Watson, an American psychologist. Watson held the view that
psychology should only concern itself with the study of behavior, and he was not concerned
with the mind or with human consciousness. He considered it paramount that men could be
studied objectively, like rats and apes.
Watson's work was based on the experiments of Ivan Pavlov, and classical conditioning.
Nowadays, behaviorism is associated with the name of B.F. Skinner, who made his reputation
by testing Watson's theories in the laboratory. Skinner ultimately rejected Watson's almost
exclusive emphasis on reflexes and conditioning. Skinner believed that people respond to
their environment, but they also operate on the environment to produce certain
consequences. Thus they partiipate in a feedback loop as an important part of a larger system.
Skinner developed the theory of "operant conditioning," the idea that we behave the way we
do because this kind of behavior has had certain consequences in the past.
Presuppositions of behaviorism:
1. Behaviorism is naturalistic. This means that the material world is the ultimate reality, and
everything can be explained in terms of natural laws. Man has no soul and no mind, only a
brain that responds to external stimuli.
2. A central tenet of behaviorism is that thoughts, feelings, intentions, and mental processes,
do not determine what we do. Behaviorism views behavior as the product of conditioning.
Humans are biological machines and do not consciously act; rather they react to stimuli.
3. Consistently, behaviorism teaches that we are not responsible for our actions. If we are
mere machines, without minds or souls, reacting to stimuli and operating on our environment
to attain certain ends, then anything we do is inevitable.
4. Behaviorism is manipulative. It seeks not merely to understand human behavior, but to
predict and control it. From his theories, Skinner developed the idea of "shaping." By
controlling rewards and punishments, you can shape the behavior of another person.
Criticism of Behaviorism
Behavioral theories do not account for free will and
internal influences such as moods, thoughts, and
feelings.
As a learning theory, Behaviorism doesn’t take into
account important internal processes that take place in
the mind.
Language acquisition was one type of learning Skinners
learning theory cannot account for. Chomsky for
example, responding to Skinner’s Verbal behavior, shows
that language acquisition occurs because of some innate
abilities that children are endowed with which explains
that they can produce an indefinite number of utterances
they have never heard.
There are many instances of learning that occurs
without the use of reinforcements or punishments.
People and animals are able to adapt their behavior
when new information is introduced, even if a previous
behavior pattern has been established through
reinforcement.
Behaviorists focus on the target, desirable behavior,
that is the product. They fail to explain how humans
learn, the process through which the learning takes
place.
For a behaviorist what occurs between the stimulus
and the response (the black box) is of little importance.
The very meaning of the learning process is banned from
any scientific analysis in the behavioristic approach (the
black box shouldn’t be opened.)
Types of Behaviorism
Historically, the most significant distinction between versions of behaviorism is
that between Watson's original 'methodological behaviorism', and forms of
behaviorism later inspired by his work, known collectively as neobehaviorism.
Watson's article 'Psychology as the behaviorist views it' is often referred to as
the 'behaviorist manifesto', in which Watson (1913, p. 158) outlines the
principles of all behaviorists:
'Psychology as the behaviorist views it is a purely objective experimental
branch of natural science. Its theoretical goal is the prediction and control of
behavior. Introspection forms no essential part of its methods, nor is the
scientific value of its data dependent upon the readiness with which they lend
themselves to interpretation in terms of consciousness.
The behaviorist, in his efforts to get a unitary scheme of animal response,
recognizes no dividing line between man and brute. The behavior of man, with
all of its refinement and complexity, forms only a part of the behaviorist's total
scheme of investigation'.
Radical behaviorism was founded by B.F Skinner and agreed with the
assumption of methodological behaviorism that the goal of psychology should
be to predict and control behavior.
Skinner, like Watson, also recognized the role of internal mental events, and
while he agreed such private events cannot be used to explain behavior he
proposed they should be explained in the analysis of behavior.
Another important distinction between methodological and radical behaviorism
concerns the extent to which environmental factors influence behaviour.
Watson's (1913) methodological behaviorism asserts the mind is tabula rasa (a
blank slate) at birth. In contrast, radical behaviorism accepts the view that
organisms are born with innate behaviours, and thus recognises the role of
genes and biological components in behavior.