Language Acquisition Theories
Language Acquisition Theories
Language Acquisition Theories
THEORIES
INDEX
1. INTRODUCTION
3. CONSTRUCTIVISM
4. SOCIAL INTERACTIONISM
5. NATIVISM
6. CONCLUSION
1) INTRODUCTION
This essay describes different language acquisition theories which deserve to be mentioned.
and d) Nativism.
Language acquisition is the process by which humans acquire language. Children develop
the ability to comprehend language before being able to speak it. Next, four major language
2) BEHAVIOURISM
Skinner, one of the major defenders of Behaviourism, believed that language is learned by
“association, imitation and reinforcement”. “According to this view, children learn words by
associating sounds with objects, actions, and events. They also learn words and syntax by
imitating others. Adults enable children to learn words and syntax by reinforcing correct
pattern; the resulting behaviour as a response to a certain stimulus. It is also worth noting
that Skinner developed the Operant Conditioning that emphasizes the idea that learning
It is also important to mention another theory which is called Connectionism. This theory
emphasized the idea that patterns are built up through repeated exposure to language which
permits grammatical language to develop. During this process the rules are present in the
child´s mind.
Criticism:
Behaviourism is unable how children acquire language. There are innumerable sentences in
a language. Hence, children are not able to learn by imitation all those sentences. Many
times children tend to overregularize verbs. So these grammatical forms cannot be learned
by imitation because adults normally use correct verb forms. What is more, children have the
capacity to develop “language skills even though adults do not correct their syntax”.
3) CONSTRUCTIVISM
Constructivism was a learning theory whose goal was to elucidate the processes by which
an infant evolve into an individual whit rational capacities and who can develop thoughts
using hypotheses. The theory suggests that people “construct own understanding of the
According to Piaget, children go through four stages in their cognitive development which will
be explained later in the essay. The concept of cognitive development is defined by Marcy
into the adult’s conceptual competence and problem-solving skill” (Driscoll, 1994).
DESCRIPTION OF STAGES:
During this stage children use their senses in order to interact with the environment relying
on skills such as touching, seeing or sucking. Piaget asserted that infants are limited to
motor reflexes and sensory perceptions at birth. However, they learn to develop more
para. 2)
The Preoperational Stage (2 to 6 years):
According to Piaget, children in the Preoperational stage can think about objects and events
and represent them by using drawings. Role playing is another example of cognitive abilities.
Furthermore, this stage focuses on abilities that children have not yet developed such as the
inability to understand that people can have different perspectives of the world which is
called egocentrism and that the objects´ appearance can be altered but their properties do
This stage is marked by the beginning of logical thinking. Nevertheless, children can only
think about physical objects. Moreover, during this stage children begin to lose
their egocentric view of things and start to be better at conservation tasks. The child also
begins to understand reversibility: the fact that things can be returned to their original state.
During this stage, people are able to think logically and to comprehend for example a
III) Equilibration: this concept refers to the mental restructuration which adopts a
There have been many criticisms of Piaget’s theory. Some examples of criticism are the
following one: the stages are very restrictive; the child produces more knowledge than he or
she is being exposed. Furthermore, most of psychologists state that children are more
competent than Piaget suspected. Despite this criticism, Piaget´s theory has had a
4) SOCIAL INTERACTIONISM
-According to this theory, language is learned by interaction with adults or older children. The
most important social interactionists are Joseph Bruner and Lev Vygotsky. Bruner states that
Bruner as a teaching language) that consists of a particular speech that parents use in order
to teach language to their children. Hence, the role of caregiver speech is essential in this
high frequency, repetition, simple syntax and concrete vocabulary.” (Wikiversity, 2013,
Vygotsky highlighted the importance of social interaction to learn language. He believed that
children observe adults while they are communicating and afterwards they develop the
ability to communicate on their own. Moreover, he agreed that interaction between children
and adults helps children to develop the capacity of problem solving on their own.
Criticism:
contains many grammatical errors and hesitations and it is also formed by few complex
sentences. What is more, children are able to acquire language even if they have poor
1) NATIVISM
Noam Chomsky proposed the Nativist theory. He states that humans have a language
acquisition device (LAD) wired in their brains. This device is in charge of allowing children to
develop language skills. Chomsky suggests that “language is an innate faculty”. In other
words, he believed that children are born with a universal grammar in their heads
Evidence for an innate human capacity to acquire language skills comes from the following
observations:
“The stages of language development occur at about the same ages in most children, even
Deaf children who have not been exposed to a language may make up their own language.
These new languages resemble each other in sentence structure, even when they are
Acquisition,”para.2)
Criticism:
According to this theory, children are not provided with any corrective feedback during their
According to this device children are expected to develop normal language without regard to
the quality of the language heard to initiate the LAD. Nevertheless, children who are
exposed to poor language skills usually develop less language skills than the ones who are
exposed to plenty of correct grammar. (Ehow, 2013, “Nativism Language Development”,
para.6)
6) CONCLUSION
In conclusion, all the theories described in this essay try to explain how language is
acquired. The first three theories state that language is learned. Nevertheless, the last theory
suggests that language is acquired thanks to our innate capacity to develop language skills.
development; those stages are criticised because they are too restrictive.
Social Interactionism argues that Child-Directed Speech has an important role in the children
To sum up most of these theories are criticized because children produce more knowledge
BIBLIOGRAPHY:
https://www.boundless.com/psychology/human-development/cognitive-development-in-
childhood/formal-operational-stage/
Driscoll, Marcy P. (1994). Psychology of learning for instruction. Needham, Ma: Allyn
& Bacon
Kendra Cherry. (2013). Preoperational Stage of Cognitive Development. Retrieved October
Kendra Cherry. (2013). Support and Criticism of Piaget's Stage Theory. Retrieved October
Margaret Anderson. (2013). Sensorimotor Stage. Retrieved October 20, 2013, from:
http://web.cortland.edu/andersmd/piaget/sms.html
Rebecca Herron. (2013). Nativist Language Development. Retrieved October 22, 2013,
from: http://www.ehow.com/about_6113587_nativist-language-
development.html#ixzz2iwcHOj4Z
from:http://www.simplypsychology.org/piaget.html
Saul McLeod. (2010). Concrete Operational Stage. Retrieved October 20, 2013, from:
http://www.simplypsychology.org/concrete-operational.html
http://www.sparknotes.com/psychology/psych101/languageandcognition/section2.rhtml
http://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Psycholinguistics/Theories_and_Models_of_Language_Acquisiti
on