Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 100 views

    Rule 22 Computation of Time

    Uploaded by

    Marichel
    This document summarizes rules regarding the computation of time limits set in legal documents and proceedings. It discusses two main rules: (1) excluding the first day and including the last day of a time period; and (2) interrupting a time period if an act effectively stops the clock, and then restarting the counting on the day after such interruption ceases. It provides examples to illustrate how these rules are applied in practice, emphasizing the importance of excluding any day where an interrupting act occurs from the time computation.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Rule 22 Computation of Time

    Uploaded by

    Marichel
    100 views2 pages
    This document summarizes rules regarding the computation of time limits set in legal documents and proceedings. It discusses two main rules: (1) excluding the first day and including the last day of a time period; and (2) interrupting a time period if an act effectively stops the clock, and then restarting the counting on the day after such interruption ceases. It provides examples to illustrate how these rules are applied in practice, emphasizing the importance of excluding any day where an interrupting act occurs from the time computation.

    Original Description:

    Rule 22 Computation of Time

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document summarizes rules regarding the computation of time limits set in legal documents and proceedings. It discusses two main rules: (1) excluding the first day and including the last day of a time period; and (2) interrupting a time period if an act effectively stops the clock, and then restarting the counting on the day after such interruption ceases. It provides examples to illustrate how these rules are applied in practice, emphasizing the importance of excluding any day where an interrupting act occurs from the time computation.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    100 views2 pages

    Rule 22 Computation of Time

    Uploaded by

    Marichel
    This document summarizes rules regarding the computation of time limits set in legal documents and proceedings. It discusses two main rules: (1) excluding the first day and including the last day of a time period; and (2) interrupting a time period if an act effectively stops the clock, and then restarting the counting on the day after such interruption ceases. It provides examples to illustrate how these rules are applied in practice, emphasizing the importance of excluding any day where an interrupting act occurs from the time computation.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 2

    Rule 22

    COMPUTATION OF TIME

    Section 1. How to compute time. In computing any period of time prescribed


    or allowed by these Rules, or by order of the court, or by any applicable
    statute, the day of the act or event from which the designated period of time
    begins to run is to be excluded and the date of performance included. If the
    last day of the period, as thus computed, falls on a Saturday, a Sunday, or a
    legal holiday in the place where the court sits, the time shall not run until
    the next working day. (n)

    This is what is known as “EXCLUDE THE FIRST AND INCLUDE THE LAST DAY” rule. That is
    how it has always been done even before this new rule. However, it was not expressed, there is
    nothing in the previous rules mentioning that rule but that was really the rule followed.

    So, if you received the summons today, for example and you have 15 days to answer, you start
    counting 1(one) tomorrow, not today because the day of the act or event from which the designated
    period of time begins to run is to be excluded.

    Q: Now what happens if the last day to answer falls on a Saturday, Sunday or a legal holiday?
    A: Then, the time shall not run until the next working day. So there will be an automatic extension
    to Monday or the next working day.

    So at least, the new rules now embody the rule of computation of time.

    Sec. 2. Effect of interruption. Should an act be done which effectively


    interrupts the running of the period, the allowable period after such
    interruption shall start to run on the day after notice of the cessation of the
    cause thereof.
    The day of the act that caused the interruption shall be excluded in the
    computation of the period. (n)

    EXAMPLE: The defendant received the summons and the complaint on a certain day. He has 15
    days to file his answer. An example of an act in between which effectively interrupts the running of the
    15-day period is when the defendant files a motion to dismiss instead of filing an answer, or a motion
    for a bill of particulars. In which case, the running of the 15-day period stops. And since it is stopped,
    you cannot declare the defendant in default.
    Q: Now, when will it start to run again?
    A: It will start to run again when the defendant receives a court order denying his motion to
    dismiss.

    For example: A motion to dismiss is filed on the 7th day (instead of filing an answer). Then after
    several weeks, the court denied the motion to dismiss and he received the order of denial.
    Q: So how many days more to go?
    A: Meron pa siyang eight (8) days to go. But the minimum guaranteed is five(5) days under Rule 12
    and 16.

    Now, what is the meaning of the last sentence “The day of the act that cause the interruption shall
    be excluded in the computation of the period.” Let’s try to illustrate that:

    FACTS:
    January 31 – defendant is served with summons
    February 8 – defendant files a motion to dismiss
    February 15 – defendant receives order denying motion to dismiss

    Q: What is the deadline for defendant to file his answer?

    289
    JBD
    A: The 15-day period started to run on January 31. From January 31 to February 8, he consumed 8
    days. From February 8 to 15, not counted because interrupted man by motion to dismiss. Then, on
    February 15, he received the order denying his motion to dismiss.

    So the remaining balance of the 15-day period starts to run again. And 15 minus 8 is equal to 7.
    Therefore, February 15 + 7 = February 22. That is how you arrive at your (WRONG) answer.

    Now, I’m sure if you ask majority of lawyers and judges with that kind of problem, they will give
    the same answer. But the answer is WRONG. Why?

    Q: How many days did he consume from January 31 to February 8?


    A: Hindi naman 8 days eh. 7 days lang because the filing of the motion to dismiss has interrupted.

    So when you file the motion to dismiss on February 8, interrupted na. So February 8 is not counted.
    So you consumed 7 days only. Yaaaannnn…….

    Therefore, if he consumed 7 days, he has 8 days pa from February 15 to file. So the deadline is
    February 23. Yaaaannnn! Because the law says: “The day of the act that caused the interruption shall be
    excluded in the computation of the period.” The act that caused the interruption is the filing of the
    motion to dismiss and it was filed on February 8. So, February 8 is already excluded in the computation
    of the period.

    Take note of that, that is a very important point because it may mean the answer is filed on time or
    out of time. Kahit sa appeal, applicable din ito. That’s why that provision may sound very innocent
    but it is a very important provision.

    <

    290
    JBD

    You might also like