USAMA IBN MUNQIDH The Book of Contemplation
USAMA IBN MUNQIDH The Book of Contemplation
USAMA IBN MUNQIDH The Book of Contemplation
BOOK OF CONTEMPLATION
USAMA IBN MUNQIDH was born on 4 July 1095 at his family’s castle at Shayzar,
on the banks of the Orontes River in northern Syria. His clan, the Banu
Munqidh, was an established aristocratic Muslim Arab family who had gained
political prominence locally and elsewhere in the medieval Near East at a time
when the Muslim world was adjusting to the Turkish invasions of the eleventh
century, and still reeling from the Crusades of the twelfth. Exiled from Shayzar
by an uncle who saw him as a rival, Usama took up service with many of the
most prominent courts of the region, in Iraq, Syria and Egypt, giving him ample
opportunity to hone his skills as a warrior, diplomat and man of letters, and to
observe the strange customs of his new Frankish neighbours. Usama was a
political schemer of the first order, and much of his wandering can be attributed
to his involvement in numerous failed adventures. In 1157, most members of his
family were killed in an earthquake that left Shayzar in ruins and Usama and his
ambitions wrecked. In the last decades of his life, he retired from active service
and concentrated on writing, collecting his scattered poems into a much-praised
Diwan, but specializing in topical anthologies of poetry and prose like the Book
of the Staff or Kernels of Refinement, both excerpted here. Usama’s last patron
was the mighty sultan Saladin, for whom he intended his most famous work,
translated here in full, his charming and heavily autobiographical meditation on
Fate, The Book of Contemplation. He died in Damascus in 1188.
PENGUIN BOOKS
FORLMH
Concordiam in populo
PENGUIN CLASSICS
Published by the Penguin Group
Penguin Books Ltd, 80 Strand, London WC2R 0RL, England
Penguin Group (USA) Inc., 375 Hudson Street, New York, New York 10014, USA
Penguin Group (Canada), 90 Eglinton Avenue East, Suite 700, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M4P 2Y3
(a division of Pearson Penguin Canada Inc.)
Penguin Ireland, 25 St Stephen’s Green, Dublin 2, Ireland
(a division of Penguin Books Ltd)
Penguin Group (Australia), 250 Camberwell Road, Camberwell, Victoria 3124, Australia
(a division of Pearson Australia Group Pty Ltd)
Penguin Books India Pvt Ltd, 11 Community Centre, Panchsheel Park, New Delhi – 110 017, India
Penguin Group (NZ), 67 Apollo Drive, Rosedale, North Shore 0632, New Zealand
(a division of Pearson New Zealand Ltd)
Penguin Books (South Africa) (Pty) Ltd, 24 Sturdee Avenue, Rosebank, Johannesburg 2196, South Africa
Penguin Books Ltd, Registered Offices: 80 Strand, London WC2R 0RL, England
www.penguin.com
The moral right of the translator and editor has been asserted
Except in the United States of America, this book is sold subject to the condition that it shall not, by
way of trade or otherwise, be lent, re-sold, hired out, or otherwise circulated without the publisher’s prior
consent in any form of binding or cover other than that in which it is published and without a similar
condition including this condition being imposed on the subsequent purchaser
ISBN: 9781101489444
Contents
Acknowledgements
List of Abbreviations
Chronology of Events in the Life of
Usama ibn Munqidh
Introduction
Further Reading
A Note on the Texts
THE BOOK OF CONTEMPLATION
PART I
PART II
PART III
PART IV
OTHER EXCERPTS
Lost Fragments from The Book of
Contemplation
Fragments from the Book of the Staff
Fragments from Kernels of Refinement
Register of Proper Names
Glossary
Maps
1. The Near East in Usama’s Lifetime
2. The Levant after the First Crusade
3. Shayzar and Vicinity in the Middle Ages
Family Tree: The Banu Munqidh
Notes
Index
Acknowledgements
Much of this book was written with the support of an utterly undeserved
Fellowship from the John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation. The
History department of the College of Arts and Letters at the University of Notre
Dame rather too gleefully provided me with the semesters off to enjoy the
honour, and Notre Dame’s Institute for Scholarship in the Liberal Arts provided
the administrative help in dealing with it all.
Many individuals had some role to play in the final form of this book, though I
can name only a few of them here. Any faults that remain are of course entirely
my own. Niall Christie, Don-John Dugas, Anne Lester and John Meloy were
valued sounding-boards for some of my editorial decisions at an early stage.
Andrew Dimock and Megan Reid read more mature and lengthy versions of the
text, and their comments were correspondingly crucial. Drs Meloy and Reid in
particular gave generously of their time to help me hunt down and bag
superfluities of prose. Many others provided key moments of clarity and
assistance, including Remie Constable, Bruce Craig, Michael Driscoll, Steve
Humphreys, Hilary Kilpatrick, Yaacov Lev, Alexander Martin, Megan
Montague, Carl Petry, Nasser Rabbat, Warren Schultz, Daniella Talmon-Heller
and Cristina Tonghini. My parents and siblings provided the usual chorus of
warm approval. The people at Penguin made the writing of the book a true
pleasure, especially Charlene Davis at the very beginning and Mariateresa Boffo,
Elisabeth Merriman and Monica Schmoller at the very end.
I also thank the publisher Taylor and Francis for granting me permission to
print slightly amended versions of translations that originally appeared in two
articles by me: ‘Usama ibn Munqidh’s Book of the Staff (Kitab al-’Asa):
Autobiographical and Historical Excerpts’, Al-Masaq: Islam and the Medieval
Mediterranean 17 (2005), pp. 109–23, and ‘Usama ibn Munqidh’s Kernels of
Refinement (Lubab al-Adab): Autobiographical and Historical Excerpts’, Al-
Masaq: Islam and the Medieval Mediterranean 18 (2006), pp. 67–78. For further
details see www.informaworld.com. The family tree of the Banu Munqidh
included in this book is based upon that found in André Miquel’s translation,
Des Enseignements de la Vie (Paris, 1983), pp. 78–9, with some emendations.
A few people gave me special gifts. David Nicolle kept me honest about my
translations of medieval military technical terms and helped me crack the vexing
mystery of the ‘chisel-headed’ arrow. Qasim al-Samarrai, in a gesture that
Usama would have found min al-’aja’ib, sent me from Leiden his personal copy
of his hard-to-find edition of the Kitab al-I’tibar so that I might make my own
copy for use in this translation. Ella Almagor greatly helped this translation
through gentle correction over the years and sheer inspiration as we spent a
memorable Jerusalem evening swapping stories like a couple of old
Munqidhites. Her own labour of love, a Hebrew translation of Usama’s work, is
eagerly expected. Finally, L. M. Harteker waited with beauty, wit and patience
while I finally found the good sense to dedicate a book to her.
List of Abbreviations
1095 4 July Usama born at Shayzar; 27 November Pope Urban II calls for the
First Crusade at Clermont.
1098 Usama’s uncle Nasr dies; his uncle Sultan rules as lord of Shayzar; 9
March County of Edessa founded by Baldwin of Boulogne; 3 June Antioch
taken by First Crusade.
1099 15 July Jerusalem taken by First Crusade.
1101 Baldwin I, King of Jerusalem; Bohemund I of Antioch taken prisoner;
Tancred regent at Antioch.
1103–5 Second reign of Bohemund at Antioch; he then departs for Europe.
1104 Muslim offensive against the Franks in northern Syria; May Franks
capture Acre.
1105–8 Second regency of Tancred at Antioch.
1105 Frankish counter-offensive in northern Syria led by Tancred.
1108–12 Tancred, Prince of Antioch.
1109 12 July Franks capture Tripoli.
1110 May Edessa besieged by Mawdud of Mosul; 5 December Baldwin I
captures Sidon.
1112 12 December death of Tancred; Roger of Salerno succeeds him at
Antioch.
1113 June failed Frankish attempt on Damascus.
1114 March Nizari assault on Shayzar.
1115 June Frankish offensive in northern Syria thwarted;15 September
Frankish victory at Danith; Muslim counter-offensive led by Bursuq of
Hamadhan thwarted.
1118 Baldwin II, King of Jerusalem.
1119 28 June Muslim victory under Il-Ghazi at al-Balat, ‘The Field of
Blood’; death of Roger of Salerno; Baldwin II of Jerusalem rules as regent
in Antioch; 14 August victory of Baldwin II over Il-Ghazi at Danith;
September Joscelin I Count of Edessa.
1119/20 Templars founded.
1123 Baldwin II taken captive in Aleppo.
1124 19 June Baldwin II a hostage at Shayzar; 7 July Franks capture Tyre;
30 August Baldwin II is released.
1126 October Bohemund II arrives from Italy and takes over as Prince of
Antioch.
1127 September Zangi made atabeg of Mosul.
1128 January Zangi captures Aleppo.
1129 November failed Damascus Crusade of Baldwin II.
1130 February Bohemund II killed in Cilicia; Baldwin II regent again at
Antioch.
1131 Joscelin II Count of Edessa; 6 June Usama exiled from Shayzar; 31
August Fulk V of Anjou, King of Jerusalem; 3 September Zangi attacks
Hama and Homs; Usama enters his service; November Usama in Mosul.
1132 Zangi (with Usama) at Tikrit; Zangi (with Usama) campaigns against
the caliph al-Mustarshid near Baghdad.
1134 Usama with Zangi on campaign against Artuqids near Amid.
1135 Failed campaign against Damascus by Zangi, followed by raids on
Antioch.
1136 Raymond of Poitiers Prince of Antioch.
1137 Campaign of Zangi against Homs; 11 July Usama with Zangi against
the Franks at Ba’rin/Rafaniya; Raymond II Count of Tripoli; 30 May death
of Usama’s father.
1138 Zangi (with Usama) in battle against the Franks near Qinnasrin; April-
May Byzantine-Frankish siege of Shayzar; Usama arrives at Burid court in
Damascus; 8 September Usama on pilgrimage to Jerusalem.
1139 Usama meets Ridwan, exiled vizier of Egypt; Ridwan imprisoned in
Egypt; 10 October Zangi conquers Baalbek.
1140–43 Voyages of Usama and Mu’in al-Din to Latin Kingdom of
Jerusalem.
1143 10 November death of Fulk V, King of Jerusalem.
1144 Edessa recaptured by Zangi; 30 November Usama arrives in Cairo.
1146 14 September death of Zangi; succeeded by Nur al-Din at Aleppo;
Joscelin II’s failed attempt to retake Edessa; Nur al-Din sacks the city.
1147–8 Nur al-Din campaigns against Antioch.
1148 Ridwan escapes from prison and attempts to seize power in Cairo; he is
killed; July armies of the Second Crusade fail at Damascus.
1149 30 August death of Mu’in al-Din in Damascus; renewed campaigns by
Nur al-Din against Antioch; 29 June defeat and death of Raymond of
Poitiers; 10 October death of Fatimid caliph al-Hafiz in Egypt; al-Zafir
succeeds him; Cairo seethes.
1150 January failed assassination plot on Ibn al-Sallar; May Usama, on a
mission from Cairo, meets with Nur al-Din outside Damascus; end of year
Usama in Ascalon, raids Franks in the vicinity.
1152 Usama returns to Cairo; Raymond II, Count of Tripoli, assassinated;
Raymond III succeeds him.
1153 Usama with the Fatimid army defending Bilbays; 3 April Ibn al-Sallar
assassinated; 22 August Ascalon captured by Franks; Reynald of Châtillon
regent at Antioch.
1154 15 April al-Zafir, Fatimid caliph, assassinated in Cairo; al-Fa’iz
succeeds him; military revolt in Cairo; 26 April Nur al-Din captures
Damascus; 30 May Usama flees Egypt; 19 June he arrives at Damascus.
1155 Usama on campaign with Nur al-Din in Anatolia.
1157 August massive earthquake in Syria; Shayzar destroyed; brief Frankish
occupation.
1158 February Franks besiege Harim; April Egyptian campaigns against
Ascalon.
1160 23 July death of Fatimid caliph al-Fa’iz; al-’Adid succeeds him;
December Usama visits Aleppo and Mosul, then proceeds on pilgrimage to
Mecca.
1163 10 February death of Baldwin III; Amalric I, King of Jerusalem,
campaigns against Egypt; Nur al-Din (with Usama) on campaign against
Antioch; Nur al-Din thwarted against Tripoli.
1164 12 August Nur al-Din recaptures Harim; Bohemund III and Raymond
III are captured; end of the year Usama moves to Hisn Kayfa in service to
Qara Arslan.
1166–7 Residence and travels of Usama in Upper Mesopotamia.
1169 26 March Saladin named vizier in Egypt.
1170 Usama visits Mosul.
1171 13 September Fatimid caliph al-’Adid dies; end of Fatimid dynasty;
Saladin seizes power in Egypt for Nur al-Din.
1171/2 Usama composes his Book of the Staff and (about this time) his
Dwellings and Abodes.
1174 15 May Nur al-Din dies at Damascus; 11 July death of Amalric;
Baldwin IV, King of Jerusalem; 28 October Saladin enters Damascus;
Usama arrives shortly thereafter; he completes his Creator of High Style
(about this time).
1176 Saladin (possibly with Usama) on campaign in north Syria.
1183 Saladin captures Aleppo; Usama completes his Kernels of Refinement
and (about this time) his Book of Contemplation.
1185 Death of Baldwin IV, King of Jerusalem; Baldwin V succeeds him,
with Raymond III of Tripoli as regent.
1186 Death of Baldwin V; Saladin lord of Mosul.
1187 Death of Raymond III of Tripoli; 2 October Saladin recaptures
Jerusalem.
1188 Saladin captures Latakia; 15 November death of Usama in Damascus.
Introduction
Usama ibn Munqidh, the author of our texts, was born at his family’s castle at
Shayzar in northern Syria on Wednesday, 4 July 1095. Later that same year, on
Tuesday, 27 November, Pope Urban II gave a speech thousands of miles away to
an assembled crowd at Clermont in the Auvergne in France that ultimately led to
the First Crusade and to thousands of European Christians marching from their
homelands towards Jerusalem in Palestine, some passing in the very shadow of
Usama’s home. This, of course, was only the first of many crusades to the Near
East, the genesis of a centuries-long sequence of expeditions that intensified the
encounter between the Islamic world and the West. Usama, a witness present at
the creation, provides through his writings a moving and memorable record of
one Muslim’s experience of that long encounter.
Usama was known among his contemporaries as a warrior, courtier and
distinguished man of letters. He was celebrated not just for his own original
creations, but also for his prodigious grasp of the vast and venerated body of
older classical Arabic poetry. Although only a few of his works have survived, it
seems clear that Usama specialized in topical anthologies – collections of poems
and anecdotes grouped around a particular theme. The last texts translated in this
book come from two such anthologies, one on walking-sticks – the Book of the
Staff – and another on refined conduct – Kernels of Refinement. In these two
works, as perhaps with others now lost, Usama included anecdotes from his own
chequered life that are as informative for students of the medieval Near East as
they are entertaining for any curious reader.
But it is through the work that forms the bulk of the present book that Usama
has rightly achieved his greatest fame. This is his collection devoted to the
inevitability of Fate, called the Kitab al-I’tibar or The Book of Contemplation.
Unlike his other works, The Book of Contemplation includes only scant samples
of poetry, relying instead on narrative anecdotes to illustrate the inscrutability of
God’s will in our lives. Remarkably for his day, Usama chose anecdotes that are
heavily autobiographical, featuring chatty tales in often informal language about
himself, his family, or the people he encountered over the course of his many
adventures. These extend from his early years at Shayzar to his service with
various Muslim lords in the Near East, including the leaders of the Muslim
‘counter-crusade’: the warlord Zangi, his son Nur al-Din and the mighty sultan
Saladin. Most famously, his recollections also include his interactions with the
Crusaders and European settlers who were his neighbours (known collectively as
‘Franks’, despite their varied origins) and his exasperated observations of their
curious ways. Written at the end of his long life, The Book of Contemplation is
shot through with precious detail, sharp wit, deep melancholy and, as with all
autobiography, gilded artifice. It is, by any token, a remarkable record of one
man’s vision of his times. Taken together, the writings presented in this book are
not just curious samples of medieval Arabic prose and autobiography. They are
in fact among the most complete and human examples of Islamic perspectives on
the crusades and a window into the new world that was formed after those
‘marked with the cross’ first arrived at the close of the eleventh century.
Usama’s World
The Islamic world in which both the first crusaders and Usama found
themselves was a divided one. As in Christendom, there had been political and
theological divisions within the Islamic community from an early period. In the
first Islamic centuries, Islamic lands were unified in theory by the caliph, who
was held to be the sole ruler of the entire Muslim community, a successor for the
Prophet Muhammad (d. 632), Islam’s founder, though not a prophet himself. In
practice, many Muslims disputed the claims of certain individuals or lineages to
hold the office of caliph. The most notable such dispute over a claimant involved
the Prophet’s cousin ‘Ali, whose followers felt he and his descendants were the
only legitimate successors to the Prophet, and so venerated them as their
religious leaders or imams (though all Muslims hold ‘Ali in high regard). Over
time, slightly different attitudes towards Islamic law, theology and practice
developed between the minority of Muslims who revered ‘Ali and his kin as
imams and the majority who did not, and the two groups coalesced into sects –
the former known as Shi ‘ites, the latter known as Sunnis. Whereas Shi ‘ites took
a sceptical view of the claims of Sunni rulers to be the heirs of the Prophet’s
right to rule the Muslim community, most Sunni Muslims simply acquiesced to
the political realities of the day and recognized as legitimate the various groups
and dynasties that held the caliphate. Since 750, the ‘Abbasid dynasty held the
office of caliph, and they would stand as the very emblem of Sunni religious
authority for most of the Middle Ages. The ‘Abbasid caliphs chose Iraq as their
central province, founding Baghdad as their capital. And so it remained, even as,
by the tenth century, the central authority of the caliphs waned and province after
province became the domain of independent successor-states, some loyal to
Baghdad, some not so loyal.
Throughout these formative centuries, Shi’ism only occasionally posed a
serious political threat to the caliphate and Shi’ites settled down tensely but
tolerantly with their Sunni neighbours, holding to their differences from the
religious mainstream, but remaining politically quiescent. However, towards the
end of the tenth century, all this changed when Shi’ism was embraced by a
number of provincial successor dynasties, in Iran, Syria, and even in the
‘Abbasid heartland of Iraq.
Foremost among these new Shi’ite states was the Fatimid caliphate of Egypt
and Syria. The Fatimids came to power first in North Africa and then, in 969,
captured Egypt and founded their capital city, Cairo. The Fatimid rulers adopted
the title of caliph and made it perfectly clear that one of their top priorities was
to eradicate their Sunni ‘Abbasid rivals. At various times, the Fatimid caliphs
controlled Egypt, Syria and Palestine, Sicily, and the coastal lands of the Red
Sea in Africa and Arabia. A Fatimid agent had once even infiltrated Baghdad.
Nevertheless, by Usama’s day, the Fatimids had long settled into their role as a
major Muslim power, and they were experiencing the ill effects of that
complacency. Although the Fatimid caliph was the titular head of state in his
realm, real power came to be held by a string of mighty viziers, who controlled
not just the administration, but also Egypt’s large and diverse military.
The Fatimids embraced a form of Shi’ism that was itself an offshoot from
mainstream Shi’ism, called Isma ‘ili Shi’ism. Isma ‘ili Shi’ism, in its turn,
experienced its own share of fissures, most notably in 1094, when Nizar, a prince
of the Fatimid dynasty, was passed over in the succession to rule his family’s
Shi’ite caliphate and rebelled. When Nizar was defeated and killed, some
members of the Isma’ili community broke away and founded their own Nizari
sect loyal to the line of the slain prince. By the early twelfth century, the Nizaris
had spread their teaching among the Isma ‘ili community already present in
Syria, and made northern Syria and the mountains near Usama’s home of
Shayzar their favoured local refuge. In the process, they now found themselves
in open conflict with fellow Shi’ites as well as with Sunnis. Outnumbered and
persecuted, the Nizaris preferred to base themselves in remote locations or
mountain fortresses and, unable to send vast armies to confront their foes, they
chose the craftier and psychologically effective method of selectively and
unpredictably murdering the leaders of their enemies. Contemporaries attributed
all manner of strange beliefs and practices to the Nizaris, and explained their
unwavering faith by claiming their agents worked under hashish-soaked
delusions. As a result, the Arabic word for hashish-eaters, hashishiyin, entered
into Western lexicons as ‘Assassins’ as the name for this sect and anyone else
who employed their tactics. In Usama’s world, the Nizaris found their victims
among the Franks, local Muslims, and even Usama’s household.
The Nizaris had felt the need to move into Syria largely because Iran, their
original home-base, had become the heartland of a new and muscular Sunni
political force: the Seljuk Turks. By the middle of the eleventh century, a
confederation of nomadic Turkoman tribesmen known as the Oghuz, under the
leadership of the Seljuk (or Saljuq) family, had migrated from Central Asia into
north-eastern Iran and taken over much of the region from local rulers. In 1055,
the Seljuks entered Iraq and crushed the local Shi’ite dynasty then dominating
the ‘Abbasid caliphs in Baghdad, a clear message to the Shi’ite Fatimids in
Egypt. The ‘Abbasid caliph granted the Seljuk rulers the title of ‘sultan’, in
recognition of the fact that they wielded effective power in the region, possessed
seemingly limitless military might and rendered timely services for the caliphate
and for Sunnism in general. Over the next few decades, the Seljuk sultans
extended their control over Iran, Iraq, and most of Syria-Palestine.
The Seljuks governed their far-flung territories as a collection of provinces
ruled by kinsmen, vassals and trusted commanders (known as amirs or emirs)
rather than as a centralized empire, and this certainly contributed to the divisions
already apparent in the region. To help them govern, the Seljuks used a
combination of tribal armies of nomadic Turkomans and, like many dynasties
before them, a standing army of (usually) Turkish slave-troops called mamluks.
The Seljuks liked to prepare their princes for their future political careers by
giving them governorates as children, sending with them a trusted commander to
rule for them and to act as a tutor and adviser. These men were known as
atabegs. Like many rulers before them, the Seljuk sultans and their men
cultivated strong ties with scholars of Islamic law and men of religion to bolster
their Sunni credentials; they also relied upon their city’s locally chosen headman
or chief (ra’is) to serve as interlocutor with their local subjects. These strategies
of rule, a mixture of ‘Abbasid precedent and Seljuk innovation, became the
standard tools for organizing Islamic states throughout the Middle Ages. For
Usama, the Seljuk sultans were distant lords, and it was their semi-autonomous
representatives, the atabegs, amirs and chiefs of the cities of Syria and Iraq, that
most concretely constituted Seljuk power for him.
These Seljuk sultans are often referred to as the ‘Great Seljuks’ to distinguish
them from another enterprising branch of the family that had left its kin behind
in Iran and forged ahead with their own Turkoman troops into Anatolia – the
first Turks to settle in what is now known as Turkey. Anatolia had for centuries
stood as the core province of the Byzantine, or eastern Roman, empire. As a
result, for Muslims Anatolia came to epitomize the empire as a whole and was
known as The Land of the Romans’, Bilad al-Rum, or just al-Rum for short. The
members of the branch of the Seljuks that conquered it were therefore known as
the Seljuks of Rum. Despite the proximity of Anatolia to northern Syria, Usama
had only limited interaction with the Seljuks of Rum, as when he fought them as
the foes of the many local lords he served.
Beyond the Seljuks of Rum, at the horizon of Usama’s world, stood
Constantinople, the redoubtable and venerable capital of the Christian, Greek-
speaking Byzantine empire. Ever since the arrival of the Turks in Anatolia, the
Byzantines had been on the defensive, trying, but never effectively succeeding,
to hold on to their lands there. In Usama’s infancy, the Byzantines were
experiencing something of a revival of fortune under an active new emperor,
Alexius Comnenus. He and his successors felt keenly the pressures that Muslim
expansion placed on their borders in Anatolia, and they never lost sight of the
fact that Syria, including Usama’s homeland, had once been Byzantine territory.
It was into this frontier, the fractured meeting-ground of Shi’ite Fatimids,
Sunni Seljuks and Christian Byzantines, that the first crusaders plunged. The
Byzantine emperor Alexius had hoped he might be able to channel the military
capabilities of the first crusaders to reconquer formerly Byzantine lands in
Anatolia and Syria. In fact, the Byzantines gained very little from the affair;
instead, the Franks wrested control of large swathes of land in the region for
themselves and made them the basis for four Latin states. The first of these to be
created was the County of Edessa, in Upper Mesopotamia, founded in 1098,
followed by the Principality of Antioch (later in 1098), the Kingdom of
Jerusalem (in 1099) and the County of Tripoli (1109). From these lands, the
armies of the Latin settlers ranged throughout Syria and Palestine and as far
afield as Egypt, Jordan, Anatolia and northern Iraq.
This Frankish threat elicited only modest concern from the sultans in the East.
From the point of view of the Great Seljuk sultans, who were usually (when not
on campaign) based in Baghdad or Isfahan in Iran, Syria was an impoverished
outlier of the Seljuk world. The sultans only occasionally made defending Syria
a priority; more often, it was an arena for ambitious atabegs, amirs, princelings
and local native vassals like Usama’s family, the Banu Munqidh. By the time
Usama was born, the Banu Munqidh had established themselves as a native Arab
household of consequence, having been involved in the politics of Aleppo and
northern Syria for some decades. Their domain was centred on the castle of
Shayzar, which sat, as it does today, nearly impregnable, on a hairpin bend in the
Orontes River at a crucial bridge and crossing-point, overlooking Shayzar town.
Although some members of the family had served the Fatimids in Cairo, the
lords of Shayzar became vassals of the Great Seljuks shortly before Usama’s
birth. Wedged between the borders of its Frankish and Muslim neighbours,
Shayzar in northern Syria sat on a frontier in a region that was itself a frontier.
This made for interesting times at Shayzar, and perhaps contributed to Usama’s
penchant for acute observations of the mysteries of God’s plan and the varieties
of human nature.
Usama’s world was but a smaller part of the world of Islam, specifically that
experienced by its warrior elites. Like his Muslim contemporaries, Usama strove
to live his life in a way that was most pleasing to God, and he received guidance
on how to do so from the teachings of the Qur’an and the injunctions of Islamic
law. He worked for both Fatimid and Seljuk (or Seljuk-allied) regimes, and it is
still an open question as to whether he considered himself a Shi’ite or a Sunni
(probably the latter). That this is so is largely because the record of his own
religious practice in his writings is rather generic, devoid of any doctrinal red
flags. What his writings do provide, though, is a record of the private practice of
a family of medieval Muslims, as opposed to the institutional or public displays
of religious belief that one typically finds in the sources. For example, Islamic
mysticism, or Sufism, does not feature much in Usama’s religious landscape.
Indeed, he did not encounter any organized Sufi brotherhoods until late in life.
Rather, Usama seems to have occupied himself with more individual expressions
of devotion, inflected by popular asceticism: praying, fasting, giving alms,
pilgrimage to Mecca and Jerusalem, rescuing prisoners, reciting the Qur’an, and
so on. He praises in others the related virtue of engaging in jihad, meaning (in
this case) holy war against the Franks. Significantly, however, he does not
describe his own military experiences in this way, much as we might think this
would have suited the men he served, a fact which reveals something of Usama’s
character and the limits of jihad-speak, even during the counter-crusade. Usama
also had a particular, but quite ordinary, fondness for visiting holy places and
holy men – if the latter should be living exemplars of piety, so much the better.
Indeed, Usama devotes a separate appendix in The Book of Contemplation to
miraculous deeds associated with such holy men. These stories are set alongside
tales of remarkable cures, which are related to the feats of holy men by the way
in which accidental remedies brought on by dream-visions or certain diets give
proof to the vagaries of God’s will.
In tandem with Usama’s refined code of honour and politesse, Islam further
structured Usama’s relationship with other men and, of course, other women. In
Usama’s world, it was taken for granted that the affairs of men overshadowed
those of women, who were seen as the building-blocks of the family and of
society, and whose chastity, therefore, men must anxiously guard. As a result, the
domestic seclusion of women was normal, and their lives, even their names, are
only sparsely mentioned in the sources. It is thus all the more delightful that
Usama has left us precious (though discreet) glimpses into this aspect of his
world.
Usama’s world was crowded with human variety. The men and women he
encountered included groups that we would nowadays call Arabs, Turks, Kurds,
Armenians, Africans, Greeks and Europeans. The people were Muslims of
various kinds, of course, but also Latin Christians loyal to Rome, Greek
Christians and Melkites loyal to Constantinople, and other native Near Eastern
Christians, whether Copts in Egypt or Syrian Orthodox Christians in Syria, Iraq
and Upper Mesopotamia, to name only the largest groups. Usama alludes
(possibly) to Druze communities in the mountains, and the larger cities of the
region always included ancient and active Jewish communities. At Shayzar
itself, Usama’s kin were of course central to his life. These included his father
Murshid, but also his domineering uncle Sultan, who was lord of Shayzar for
most of Usama’s life. His family also included a dizzying array of uncles,
cousins and nephews, as well as their women and children. Finally, it also
embraced, like the households of sultans and atabegs, servants and slaves of
various kinds, including concubines and soldiers, but also domestic help,
nannies, physicians, craftsmen, grooms, huntsmen, animal-keepers, and so on,
most referred to generically as ghilman (singular ghulam), often translated here
with equal vagueness as ‘attendant’. The Banu Munqidh were a clan composed
of many families, and so Shayzar was, quite literally, a house of many mansions.
Then there are the Franks. Usama is most famous today for his observations on
the manners and customs of the Latin settlers who inhabited his part of the
world, and he is certainly the most cherished of all the Muslim eyewitnesses of
the crusades. This is due, no doubt, to his marvellous eye for detail and human
portraiture. And it helps that his stories are also rather funny and a bit risqué too.
But as it happens, despite his personal interactions with the Franks, Usama
generally indulged in the stereotypes about Franks that were already
commonplace in his day – their lack of refinement, their low intelligence, their
animal qualities, and so on – and his own contribution to our general knowledge
of the culture of the European settlers in the Levant should not be exaggerated.
Nevertheless, Usama’s writings concerning the Franks are undeniably valuable
in two specific areas: regional politics, where he provides a localized and
personal glimpse of some of the key events, people and practices of the day; and
social relations, where he shines as a decidedly non-detached ethnographic
participant-observer of, inter alia, Frankish mores, medicine, law and religion.
Usama’s works would still be valuable and moving without his accounts of the
Franks, but we would have very little sense of what the crusades truly meant to
medieval Muslims without them.
Humans, Franks grudgingly included, were only the loudest inhabitants of
Usama’s world, which was also home to animal species so multifarious that it
startles readers who think of the Near East solely as a place of desolate
landscapes and camels (winsome as they may be). Songbirds, cats, dogs, mice,
flies, cattle, gazelles, wild asses, wild boar, deer, hares, waterfowl, horses,
hawks, falcons, serpents, hyenas, cheetahs, leopards and, most importantly, lions
are just some of the animals that appear in his writings. Usama, whose name
indeed means ‘lion’, was a keen observer of the natural world, a fact which was
an advantage for him as a poet and an absolute necessity for him as a hunter.
Like many men of the upper strata of medieval Islamic society, Usama found
hunting to be an absorbing pastime, one pursued more for sport than for
acquiring food. At Shayzar, hunting was pursued passionately, one might even
say pathologically in the case of Usama’s father, who seems to have spent most
of his free time on the chase. Usama’s writings abound with references to
hunting practices, especially his Book of Contemplation, to which he even added
an appendix devoted to hunting-stories. His days spent hunting were pleasant
times, and, as one reads his tales of the hunt, one gets a vivid sense of the
landscape around Shayzar and a palpable sense of an elderly man’s nostalgia for
endless days of youth spent with longpassed friends and kin running game to
ground amidst the liquorice-bushes, cane-brakes and asphodel of home.
The Author
When Usama was born in 1095, it may well have been expected that he would
in time become lord of Shayzar himself, and he seems to have harboured this
ambition in his later life. After the death of his uncle Nasr in 1098, his father
Murshid and his uncle Sultan were the leading men of the Banu Munqidh (see
Family Tree, pp. 272–3). Usama’s father found that politics did not agree with
his religious scruples or his ascetic bent (or his preoccupation with hunting) and
so he withdrew, leaving Sultan to become lord of Shayzar. Sultan had no male
children at the time and so the young Usama must have been raised to think that
Shayzar would one day be his. He certainly acted that way, hunting, fighting and
helping to administer the lands of his family’s domains. Usama had no formal
education as we would call it today, but instead studied under tutors who were
retained in his father’s household. From these men, some of them refugees from
the Frankish invasions, he learned rhetoric, grammar and poetry – the literary
arts any future prince should know, and which he came to embody.
He witnessed combat, beginning in his teens, and honed his skills fighting
Shayzar’s local Muslim rivals. He also had his share of experience with the
Franks, particularly those from Antioch or Tripoli, who made frequent raids to
pillage the countryside and rustle livestock. But then prolonged engagements
were often sealed with treaties and even festivities, and this allowed Usama the
opportunity to study the Franks at his ease. An even closer study was made
possible in 1124, when the captive Baldwin II, King of Jerusalem, resided at
Shayzar as a guest of his uncle Sultan while the details of a prisoner exchange
were worked out. It was a kindness that put Usama and the Banu Munqidh in
good standing with the Franks.
Family, poetry, hunting and fighting: life at Shayzar for a young man like
Usama was a dream. The rude awakening came in 1131. By then, Usama’s uncle
Sultan had managed to have a son, Muhammad, a fact which made the continued
presence of Usama at Shayzar rather troubling for him. After all, Usama’s father
had refused the lordship of Shayzar and as he grew old and infirm his brother
Sultan was increasingly the sole figure of authority left at Shayzar. Why
shouldn’t the amirate pass down to Sultan’s own son, Muhammad, instead of the
sons of his brother, especially the precious Usama? One night, according to
Usama, Sultan had a fevered conversation with him and demanded that he
collect his belongings and leave home. In June of 1131, Usama solemnly
embraced this exile, his first of many, and left Shayzar.
With Shayzar behind him, Usama sought service in the nearby principality of
Homs, which was just then under siege by Zangi, the ambitious atabeg of Mosul
and lord of Aleppo. When Homs finally fell to Zangi, Usama was captured and,
it appears, entered the atabeg’s service, residing in Mosul in Upper
Mesopotamia, where he hunted, campaigned and held literary gatherings. In
1132, Zangi was on campaign again in Syria, and Usama was posted to the city
of Hama under Zangi’s trusted general, al-Yaghisiyani. He may well have visited
Shayzar in 1137 when his father died, and he certainly was there by the spring of
1138 when, contrary to Zangi’s command, he left Hama to assist in the defence
of his home against a joint Frankish-Byzantine siege. As a result of this
infraction, when the siege was lifted Usama found himself now abandoned by
his commander yet still unwelcome in his ancestral home. He tightened his belt
and sought service in Damascus.
Damascus was the capital of a petty Turkish dynasty of Seljuk vassals called
the Burids, but the Burid princes were at the time mere figureheads who deferred
to their powerful Rasputin, the atabeg Mu’in al-Din Unur. Faced with Zangi’s
unambiguous goal of conquering their city, the Burids under Mu’in al-Din
sought to enlist the support of al-Afdal Ridwan, a former Fatimid vizier who was
in Syria hiding out from his enemies. Usama was sent on a diplomatic mission to
seal the deal, and he almost succeeded, had Ridwan not skived off back to Egypt,
where he was captured and imprisoned. After this setback, Damascus was now
obliged to make common cause with their Frankish neighbours in the Latin
Kingdom of Jerusalem, so both Mu’in al-Din and Usama travelled to Frankish
territory on numerous occasions between 1140 and 1143, visiting (at least) the
Frankish-controlled towns of Jerusalem, Acre, Nablus, Sebaste, Haifa and
Tiberias, meeting and treating with various Frankish leaders and their subjects. It
is these visits that provide the setting for many of his observations of Frankish
customs related in this volume. The treaty settled, he seems to have spent the rest
of his tenure with the Burids getting into trouble. Indeed, by 1144 his political
intrigues in Damascus had so vexed the local ra’is that the man refused to return
to the city until Mu’in al-Din had expelled Usama, his family and his followers.
His welcome overstayed, Usama took the hint and arrived in Cairo, the capital of
the Fatimid caliphate of Egypt, later that year.
In Cairo, the reigning caliph, al-Hafiz, was in need of seasoned commanders,
so Usama found a ready welcome for his talents as a warrior and courtier. He
also found Egypt a tempting laboratory for his own personal ambitions. Even
though he would later tell the story as a cautionary tale about testing fate, Usama
may have been inspired by what he saw of the politically fluid situation in Egypt
during the attempted coup of al-Afdal Ridwan, the once-exiled vizier whom he
had tried to enlist for the Burids against Zangi. In 1148, al-Afdal Ridwan
escaped from his confinement in Egypt and rallied sufficient troops to contest
the caliph, but he failed, spectacularly so, and was killed. Usama’s own
involvement was ambiguous. By 1149, much of Usama’s old life was behind
him and he was facing an acute crisis of patronage: his first patron Zangi had
died in 1146; Mu’in al-Din the Burid was gone too, having died after the failed
Frankish siege of Damascus during the Second Crusade (1148); and now in
Egypt the ageing caliph al-Hafiz was ill and weakened. In this setting, Usama
decided to take steps to secure his future.
The next years in Egypt were ones of plot and counter-plot, and given Usama’s
reticence about his involvement in the disasters that resulted, the scene deserves
a careful outline here. Usama found the security that he sought, or so he thought,
in an unexpected quarter. The Fatimid caliph al-Hafiz died in October of 1149
and was succeeded by his teenage son, al-Zafir. For his vizier, al-Zafir was
forced to recognize the commander Ibn al-Sallar, who seized power upon the
succession. Ibn al-Sallar brought with him his impetuous stepson, the amir
‘Abbas, who would later follow cataclysmically in his stepfather’s footsteps.
Both Ibn al-Sallar and ‘Abbas profited from the counsel and experience of
Usama, even as the resentful caliph al-Zafir hatched his plans for revenge.
Having settled into power as vizier, Ibn al-Sallar was keen to wage war on the
Franks, but he needed outside help to do so. And so he concocted a plan to make
an alliance with the rising power in Syria, the son of Zangi, named Nur al-Din,
and turned to his trusted Syrian amir Usama to see to it. Ibn al-Sallar hoped
Usama could persuade Nur al-Din to join him against the Franks, who were
threatening Ascalon, the Fatimid foothold in Palestine. After a series of
tribulations, Usama eventually made it to Syria, but was unable to forge the
necessary alliance. Nur al-Din had his own plans, which did not (yet) include
involving himself in Egyptian affairs. Usama gathered what troops he could and
returned to Cairo, pausing in Ascalon to participate in various small campaigns
against the Franks.
Returning to Cairo, Usama threw himself again into the poisonous polygonal
relationship of the caliph al-Zafir, Ibn al-Sallar, his stepson ‘Abbas and the
latter’s young son, Nasr. In 1153, Ibn al-Sallar was the first to go, assassinated in
a plot hatched by al-Zafir, ‘Abbas and Nasr and, some sources say, egged on by
Usama, who was never known to ignore the knock of a Machiavellian
opportunity. The next to go, in 1154, was the caliph himself, al-Zafir, whom
‘Abbas had brutally rubbed out, putting an infant on the throne as his successor.
Cairo exploded, and a new vizier seized power, named Ibn Ruzzik. Arriving in
Cairo, the latter forced the triumvirate of ‘Abbas, Nasr and Usama to abandon
Egypt. Usama, who was now an expert at burning bridges, had very little choice
of a destination. The three fled to Syria, facing en route a series of misadventures
and conflicts with Franks and Bedouin so dire that only Usama and his men
survived to reach Damascus, the newly conquered capital of Nur al-Din’s Syrian
domain.
Under Nur al-Din’s patronage, Usama tried to reconstruct his life in Syria as
best he could, fully conscious of his proximity to his old home, Shayzar. He
arranged to have his family sent from Egypt, though the boat was attacked by
Franks and he lost much of his property and, more tragically, his personal
library. His family reconstituted, he could now turn his attentions to Shayzar. As
his uncle Sultan had recently died, Usama saw his opportunity to make amends
with his cousin Muhammad, the new lord of Shayzar, but it was all in vain. For
in August 1157, an earthquake struck, levelling cities throughout northern Syria.
At Shayzar, where Usama’s cousin had gathered most of the family to celebrate
the circumcision of his young son, the earthquake had been indiscriminate and
destroyed the castle and nearly all who were in it. Virtually all of Usama’s
relatives were wiped out in one blow. In just one of the twists in Usama’s fate-
struck life, he, alone in Damascus, was saved from the calamity at Shayzar by
the very exile he so resented.
Usama spent the next decades as a dutiful courtier in Nur al-Din’s Syria and
then, in 1164, he entered the service of one of Nur al-Din’s vassals, Qara Arslan
of the Artuqid dynasty of Hisn Kayfa, far off in the province of Diyar Bakr in the
upper reaches of the Tigris River. His decade in Diyar Bakr is especially vague
to us, though he seems to have slowed down and taken to writing. For it is in
Diyar Bakr where he did much of the work for which he was known, including
the Book of the Staff, excerpted in the present volume.
In 1174, Usama was delighted to be asked to join the court of the new ruler of
Damascus. This was the mighty sultan Saladin, a former commander for Nur al-
Din, who, now that Nur al-Din had died, was well on his way towards building a
new and powerful state that united Egypt, Syria and Upper Mesopotamia,
whether his Frankish or Muslim rivals liked it or not. Saladin accorded the old
warrior and diplomat a certain amount of respect while he used Damascus as his
base for further conquests in Syria and Palestine. According to one source, he
would even meet with Usama for advice on warfare and proper conduct.
Usama’s advanced age kept him confined at home, where he composed and
polished his works. Among the books he finished in Damascus were the
autobiographical Book of Contemplation, translated here, and his guide to ideal
conduct, Kernels of Refinement, which has provided some excerpts in the present
volume. He also compiled his Diwan, a collection of his own poetry, which was
said to be a favourite of Saladin’s.
Indeed, it was for his literary works, not his political career, that Usama’s peers
most admired him. ‘Usama was, in the power of his poetry and prose, like his
name [“lion”],’ as one admirer put it. Another called him ‘one of the poets of the
age, holding the reins of both poetry and prose’. Usama was held to be an adib,
that is, a master of adab, a term which has come to mean ‘literature’ in a general
sense, but in Usama’s day embraced ‘refinement’ in various modes. This could
suggest refinement in the meaning of an author’s message – in its moral and
social lessons, its witty entertainment value or its intellectual stimulation. But
just as often it indicated refinement in its medium – in the high style and
cultivated vocabulary of an author’s verse and prose offerings.
Refined works like these were intended for refined audiences. Medieval
Islamic society was a highly literate one, but Usama wrote for a small elite
audience, even had there been a mass market to welcome him. Thanks to the
abundance of parchment, paper and copyists, books were relatively inexpensive
to produce, but they were nonetheless luxury items. The sorts of books Usama
wrote might find their way to the book-markets, but they were far more likely to
be granted as gifts to other elite readers, whether patrons or colleagues. In
Usama’s case, for example, the long excursus of praise for the sultan Saladin in
The Book of Contemplation is a clear indicator of the book’s intended recipient,
and an artfully crafted ‘thank you’ note from one of Usama’s colleagues testifies
to one reader who got his advance copy of the Book of the Staff. Others of his
titles were intended for family members.
The patron was, as in so many things, the key: he funded and sometimes
inspired a book, he received it and retained it as a gift and, if it became popular
in the right circles, ensured its long life by inspiring more copies or, at least,
quotations in other books. Usama had a sterling literary reputation in his day, but
given the vagaries of manuscript preservation over the centuries it is hard to
judge how he fared thereafter. All in all, posterity seems to have treated him
fairly well, even if his audience and range were limited: his works do not seem
to have been copied or quoted much beyond the fourteenth-century Near East.
Perhaps he will now receive the broader readership he deserves.
His favoured genre, the topical anthology, was a tried and true one for Arab
writers working in the adab mode, resulting in collections of poetry or of poetry
and prose combined. Usama’s most illustrious predecessor in this vein, and in
many others, was the polymath al-Jahiz (d. 868), who wrote anthologies on a
wide range of subjects, including (among many others) rhetoric, animals,
nostalgia, passion, secrets and envy. Al-Jahiz often employed a dialectical
technique whereby he alternated between highlighting a subject’s virtues and
exposing its faults, a technique that seems perverse to modern readers, but was
adopted by many writers, including Usama. A good anthologist was sensitive to
reader fatigue, so anthologists intentionally flit about from subject to subject or
insert humour when the tone gets too heavy. Usama also used these techniques.
This ‘rambling’ mode is often depicted as a product of Usama’s old age, but in
fact he is keeping to the rules of his genre. Jahizian foundations aside, Usama’s
most direct inspiration was undoubtedly al-Tha’alibi (d. 1038), a towering figure
wholly underestimated today, who wrote nearly a hundred works, of which about
half seem to have survived, and only a quarter to have been published. His
anthological interests were Jahizian in scope, but it was his great masterpiece, a
geographically arranged sampler entitled Yatimat al-dahr (Unique Pearl of the
Age), that Usama mined in his works for snippets of exquisite and ancient poetry
and (less often) prose. And there were very few writers in Usama’s time who did
not turn to al-Tha ‘alibi in this way. Indeed, like others of his peers, Usama is
credited with composing a continuation of the Yatimat, updating it to his own
era.
Like al-Jahiz and al-Tha’alibi, Usama composed works devoted to an
admirable variety of subjects, including the three works included or sampled in
the present volume (discussed below). It was only a matter of time before a
respected adib like Usama would decide to compose a work on rhetoric and
eloquence, and his al-Badi’ fi’l-Bad’ (Creator of High Style) was his answer. It is
devoted to the standard rhetorical figures used in poetry, such as antithesis,
double entendre or pun, each decked out with examples selected from the finest
poets. Usama admits in his introduction to the work that it is more of a
distillation of older treatises than a work of originality. His model seems to have
been the great rhetorician Ibn al-Mu’tazz (d. 908), who wrote a similar work on
rhetorical figures. The baroque deployment of these figures was the hallmark of
the ‘modern’ poets that many of Usama’s peers sought to emulate, as opposed to
the allegedly natural and conservative style of the ‘ancient’ poets of the pre-
Islamic and early Islamic eras. To judge from the evidence of his own poetry,
Usama put himself in the modernist camp, but he possessed an aficionado’s love
for the ancients, taking every opportunity to show off his knowledge of them by
allusion and quotation.
This is most evident in his Kitab al-Manazil wa’l-Diyar (Book of Dwellings
and Abodes). It is a masterful analysis of the conventions used in the preludes of
classical Arabic odes, and the images of campsites and dwellings they employed.
It is also a very personal work. Composed in distant Diyar Bakr, what he called
‘a forsaken corner of the world’, Usama, a restless and now ageing exile, one of
the few survivors of his devastated house, passed his idle moments compiling a
book about the longing of poets for their Time-effaced homes. Whatever his
faults, to know this is to know much about Usama and the sympathy he elicits.
Usama extended his interest to other realms. One early work was devoted to
youth and old age, and was written for his father; another seems to have been a
collection of political wisdom or a ‘mirror for princes’ for the ruler of Diyar
Bakr; still others were devoted to castles and fortresses, rivers, dream visions,
consolation, bearing loss, notable women, and other matters. For those who
know Usama’s penchant for juicy anecdotes, this list is both thrilling and
mournful: not a single word of these works survives.
Usama ibn Munqidh died in Damascus on Tuesday, 15 November 1188, at the
astonishing age of ninety-three, just over a year after his lord Saladin recaptured
Jerusalem from the Franks and turned the tide of the invasion from Europe that
had begun in Usama’s infancy. He was buried in a mausoleum on the north bank
of the Yazid River, on the east side of Mount Qasiyun, which looms over the city
now as it did then. Usama’s tomb did not last through the centuries and it is lost.
All that remains of the man are his works, only some of which comprise the
present volume.
The Works
The last two of the three works treated in this volume are quite typical of the
thematic anthology genre discussed above, though only their longer prose
anecdotes have been included here. The first of these, the Kitab al-’Asa or Book
of the Staff, is devoted to the subject of famous staves and walking-sticks. The
reader may well wonder how many of these there could possibly be, but Usama
had no trouble rounding out what is in fact a delightful sampling of poetry,
stories, history, proverbs, exegesis, tradition and random lexicographical detours.
The poetry includes selections from every era of Arabic poetry, ancients and
moderns, including poetry by Usama and other members of his family. The prose
includes some well-worn tales about, for example, the staff of Moses, but also
anecdotes from Usama’s own day, as vivid and autobiographical as any to be
found in his more famous Book of Contemplation. The book was composed in
1171 or 1172 in Diyar Bakr. Of particular note among the excerpts from the book
included here is Usama’s introduction to the text, which vividly illustrates the
place of books in medieval Islamic society (and the sort of characters that
associate with them). Other anecdotes reveal much about the religious setting of
Usama’s world, such as his account of pilgrimage to Jerusalem, of a miraculous
staff which saves a man from the Franks and of Usama’s visit to the tomb of St
John the Baptist. This last account, thanks to Derenbourg’s early and admittedly
speculative readings, has long been read as a description of the Hospitallers; the
present translation offers a slightly different reading.
The second of these texts, the Lubab al-Adab or Kernels of Refinement, is, as
its title suggests, a collection of examples (the ‘kernels’) to guide the reader to
refined social conduct. A manuscript of the work is dated to 1183 and was
presented to Usama’s son Murhaf in 1186, and so it would have been composed
during Usama’s last years under Saladin in Damascus. Like the Book of the Staff,
it consists of varied selections of Arabic poetry, including some by Usama,
pungent narratives, bits of wisdom, Qur’anic commentary, traditions of the
Prophet and, luckily for us, some meandering autobiographical accounts. The
book is divided into chapters devoted to those features that Usama thought were
absolute requirements for readers seeking refinement and courtly poise – in
short, adab: political wisdom, generosity, courage, flawless manners, eloquence,
literacy and wit, and so on. The book is not just an etiquette manual, but a
blueprint for how to become the ideal Muslim courtier in the age of the
Crusades. As such, it deserves much greater attention from historians of the
period than it has so far received. Among the few excerpts included here, of
particular interest is Usama’s account of the sequel to the First Crusade in
northern Syria, his only reference to those events that is known to have survived.
Finally, the text which makes up the bulk of this book is Usama’s famous
Kitab al-I’tibar or The Book of Contemplation, composed, as the author states,
perhaps with some inaccuracy, in his ninetieth Muslim year, or c. 1183. Given
the long encomium that ends the work, it seems likely that it was Usama’s
patron, the mighty Saladin, who was the work’s intended recipient.
Because of the book’s heavily autobiographical nature, it is often referred to as
Usama’s ‘memoirs’, but that is not really an acceptable label. Usama certainly
filled the book with accounts about himself and about people and events from
his own long life. But it is not intended to be a narrative of his life, still less a
soul-searching reflection upon his contribution to history. The focus of the book,
evident in its Arabic title, if not in all of its many English approximations, is
rather different.1 The i’tibar promised in the title is not just learning or reflection,
but the gaining of knowledge by contemplation of ‘ibar (singular ‘ibra),
instructive examples or proofs of divine omnipotence. The term is Qur’anic: the
story of Joseph, for example, ends with the statement, ‘There is a lesson [‘ibra]
in the stories of such people for those who understand.’2 The Qur’an frequently
exhorts its audience to learn from the fate of hard-hearted pagans and the ruins
of their once-proud civilizations. Usama makes use of this theme or its variants
throughout his own work. Contemplation of the passing of what had once been
was also something of a sub-genre in Arabic literature, from the belles-lettrist al-
Jahiz (d. 868) to the philosopher of history Ibn Khaldun (d. 1406). Usama’s Book
of Contemplation, then, is a meditation upon the basic fact that God works in
mysterious ways, and nothing we can do will hasten or slow the fate that He has
decreed for us. Readers are surely grateful that most of the richly detailed
examples he adduces to demonstrate this fact come from his own fateful life, but
Usama is not the hero of the book – God is.
Usama, his family, the Franks, Egyptians, Syrians, men, women, friends, foes,
creatures natural and supernatural all populate the pages of this remarkable book
and provide fodder for our contemplation. No matter the person (or beast) or the
context, God alone chooses the moment to effect His will and to cause success or
failure, often with utter disregard of our own expectations. A mighty warrior
cannot overcome his fate, but even the lowliest person can survive lethal blows
if their time has not yet come. A hornet sting may kill one man if God so
decides, but a dog might save another man from a vicious lion. A Frank might
wound one of Usama’s kinsmen but, then again, that Frank might just as easily
be eaten by a leopard. Repeatedly, we see the marvels of God’s creation, in the
bizarre behaviour of barbarians like the Franks, in remarkable cures for ailments,
in the miracles of holy men and in the strength of character in unexpected
quarters: in women, slaves and even animals.
The Book of Contemplation consists of individual anecdotes strung together,
usually grouped in clusters of sub-themes, like ‘pearls on a necklace’, to use an
image beloved of the medieval anthologists. It is grouped into two parts, each
one (to judge from the surviving complete parts) beginning and ending with an
ornate narrative envelope affirming the specific topic of each section. The
introduction of Part I is lost, but thanks to a quotation preserved by a later author
(see Other Excerpts below) Usama’s introductory paragraph and description of
its contents has been preserved. From this evidence, it is clear that Part I was
intended to provide examples from battles in which Usama himself participated
and the great events’ and ‘calamities’ that he witnessed at Shayzar and during his
long career serving other lords. The surviving manuscript, which is badly
damaged, begins close to the end of Part I, just before Usama leaves the service
of the Atabeg Zangi. It passes rather rapidly through his stay with the Burids of
Damascus, proceeds to his Egyptian imbroglio and concludes with him entering
the service of Nur al-Din.
Part II, the bulk of the surviving text, is clearly indicated by a new page in the
manuscript and a shift of focus. This part also deals with military examples,
‘Wonders of Warfare, Against Infidels and Muslims’, but in fact treats a whole
range of subtopics, and is not simply limited to Usama’s own experience, but
also includes stories told to him by others, indicated by an isnad, a long chain of
authorities (e.g., ‘I heard from my father that the lord of Damascus told him that
someone told him the following tale’), or Usama’s recollection of events in
which he was not actually involved. It is in this section, for example, that we
find his reflections on the Frankish character, on bravery, on admirable women,
remarkable animals, and so on. After a rather mournful monologue of despair at
his weakness and old age, this part – and with it the book proper – ends with an
encomium to Saladin. However, the text does not end here, for Usama has
appended two short sections to The Book of Contemplation, at least to this
manuscript. One is devoted to ‘Curious Tales’ of holy men and healers, the other
to tales of hunting. These are clearly and explicitly later additions to The Book of
Contemplation, and while they do not form an integral part of that book, they
nevertheless share its major goal of providing examples of Fortune’s fickle tides
for the reader to ponder.
The most notable feature of The Book of Contemplation, and the one for which
it is suitably famous, is the ambidextrous nature of Usama’s style and language.
On the one hand, there are long introductory and hortatory passages written in
the baroque high style that Usama loved, usually in the form of rhymed prose
called saj’. On the other, there is the rest of the book, written in a style so
informal as to have been a little shocking at the time. The anecdotes certainly
make refreshing reading when compared, say, to the stylistic fireworks that al-
Jahiz uses in his writing. One gets the sense that one is listening to Usama
quietly reminiscing, not reading the carefully crafted cautionary tales of a master
of rhetoric and high style. But, of course, therein lies his mastery: he makes his
artifice seem natural.
Behind this informality, there is also a sort of linguistic optical illusion at
work. For Usama chose to write most of this work not in the formal and
cultivated classical Arabic of his literati peers, but rather in an Arabic that,
though founded in classical Arabic, in fact contains forms of what scholars have
come to call Middle Arabic. It is certainly not ‘pure’ classical Arabic, to judge
from the number of words of Turkish, Persian and even Old French origin. For
the latter, Usama usually supplies an explanatory aside, and so I have put these
words into their modern French equivalents to retain their foreignness in this
English translation. Vocabulary aside, Middle Arabic is emphatically not, as is
sometimes believed, a degraded version of classical Arabic – they are both
roughly parallel outgrowths of the Arabic of north Arabia. Middle Arabic simply
possesses a distinctive and less rigid grammar, syntax and morphology that are at
odds with those of classical Arabic. For Usama, Middle Arabic forms were
modern and were what came to mind; classical Arabic was more ‘literary’ and
required a certain amount of forethought. The Book of Contemplation is one of
the very few Islamic texts to preserve Middle Arabic forms from this period, and
so is doubly precious in this regard. Moreover, the evidence of Usama’s
occasional ‘slips’ into Middle Arabic suggests something about his working
method, i.e., that this work was dictated and copied down, rather than written by
Usama himself (although he may have used notes). The copyist, or a copyist,
seems further to have tried to ‘clean up’ Usama’s Middle Arabic a bit by
‘classicizing’ some of the offending expressions. In Arabic, the result reads a bit
like thieves’ cant spoken by the Queen, but for translators it allows for a text that
is marvellously conversational and diverting.3
Translating Usama
1. The book has been variously called Memoirs, Autobiography, the Book of
Learning by Example, Life’s Examples, Life’s Lessons and Reflections to
name only a few choices. The title used here, The Book of Contemplation,
is no great improvement.
2. Qur’an 12:111.
3. On Usama’s use of Middle Arabic, the technical study by Schen is
fundamental: I. Schen, ‘Usama ibn Munqidh’s Memoirs: Some Further
Light on Muslim Middle Arabic, Part I’, Journal of Semitic Studies 17
(1972), pp. 218–36; and ‘Part II’, Journal of Semitic Studies 18 (1973), pp.
64–97.
4. Philip K. Hitti, An Arab-Syrian Gentleman and Warrior in the Period of
the Crusades: Memoirs of Usama Ibn Munqidh (New York: Columbia
University Press, 1929). Here I do not reckon the rendering of George R.
Potter, The Autobiography of Ousama (London: Routledge, 1929), which is
simply an English translation of Derenbourg’s French (see note 5). For the
same reason, I exclude Georg Schumann’s German rendering, Usama Ibn
Munkidh, Memoiren eines syrischen Emirs aus der Zeit der Kreuzzüge
(Innsbruck: Wagner’schen Universitäts-Buchhandlung, 1905) and the
Russian rendering of M. A. Salier, Kniga nazidaniia (Petrograd:
Gosudarstvennoe Izdatel’stvo, 1922).
5. Hartwig Derenbourg, Ousâma ibn Mounkidh: Un Émir syrien au premier
siécle des Croisades (1095–1188). Texte arabe de l’Autobiographie
d’Ousâma publié d’après le manuscrit de l’Escurial (Paris and Leiden:
Ernest Leroux, 1886); idem, Ousâma ibn Mounkidh: Un Émir syrien au
premier siècle des Croisades (1095–1188), Tome Premier: Vie d’Ousâma
(Paris: Ernest Leroux, 1889); idem, Souvenirs historiques et récits de
chasse par un émir syrien du douzième siècle. Autobiographie d’Ousâma
Ibn Mounkidh intitulée «L’instruction par les exemples» (Paris: Ernest
Leroux, 1895).
6. Hartwig Derenbourg, ‘Comment j’ai découvert en 1880 à l’Escurial le
manuscrit arabe contenant l’Autobiographie d’Ousâma Ibn Mounkidh
(1095–1188)’, preface to Schumann, Memoiren, pp. v-ix.
7. Usama ibn Munqidh, Kitab al-I’tibar, ed. Philip Khuri Hitti (Princeton:
Princeton University Press, 1930).
8. André; Miquel, Des Enseignements de la Vie: Souvenirs d’un gentilhomme
syrien du temps des Croisades (Paris: Collection Orientale de l’Imprimerie
Nationale, 1983); Gernot Rotter, Ein Leben im Kampf gegen
Kreutzritterheere (Tübingen: Horst Erdmann, 1978); Holger Preissler, Die
Erlebnisse des syrischen Ritters Usama ibn Munqid (Leipzig: Gustav
Kiepenheuer, 1981).
9. Usama ibn Munqidh, Kitab al-I’tibar, ed. Qasim al-Samarra’i (Riyadh: Dar
al-Asala, 1987).
10. Hitti, Memoirs.
11. H. A. R. Gibb, book review of Philip K. Hitti, An Arab-Syrian
Gentleman and Warrior in the Period of the Crusades, Bulletin of the
School of Oriental and African Studies 6 (1943), pp. 1003–11.
12. G. Rex Smith, ‘A New Translation of Certain Passages of the Hunting
Section of Usama ibn Munqidh’s I’tibar’, Journal of Semitic Studies 26
(1981), pp. 235–55.
Further Reading
Editions
Usama
Cobb, Paul M., Usama ibn Munqidh: Warrior-Poet of the Age of Crusades
(Oxford: Oneworld, 2005). A short, up-to-date and accessible biography of
Usama.
—, ‘Usama ibn Munqidh’s Book of the Staff (Kitab al-’Asa):
Autobiographical and Historical Excerpts’, Al-Masaq: Islam and the
Medieval Mediterranean 17 (2005), pp. 109–23.
—, ‘Usama ibn Munqidh’s Kernels of Refinement (Lubab al-Adab):
Autobiographical and Historical Excerpts’, Al-Masaq: Islam and the
Medieval Mediterranean 18 (2006), pp. 67–78
Derenbourg, Hartwig, Ousâma ibn Mounkidh: Un Émir syrien au premier
siècle des Croisades (1095–1188). Tome Premier: Vie d’Ousâma (Paris:
Ernest Leroux, 1889). The classic biography of Usama and the starting
point for serious research on him.
Irwin, Robert, ‘Usamah ibn Munqidh: An Arab-Syrian Gentleman at the
Time of the Crusades Reconsidered’, in The Crusades and Their Sources:
Essays Presented to Bernard Hamilton, ed. J. France and W. G. Zajac
(Aldershot: Ashgate, 1998), pp. 71–87. A sensitive sketch of Usama in his
literary context.
Medieval Islam
The Crusades
To make the texts in this book more accessible to non-specialists, I have taken
one especially drastic step. Medieval Arabic names are famously complex and
repetitive, and one individual might be referred to in five different ways in the
course of the same paragraph. When combined with the heavy use of pronouns
in the original, it is no wonder that even the best-prepared readers lose their way.
I have therefore regularized all the names in the texts (and have often spelled out
pronouns). That is, I have chosen one distinctive form and have almost always
retained it whenever Usama refers to that person, regardless of the form actually
used in the text itself. Usama does not play with names in any complicated way,
so this step has I hope made the text easier to follow without adversely affecting
our author’s literary intentions. Readers who really want to know the specific
name-forms will usually have enough Arabic to go to the original. Thus, the
commander Salah al-Din Muhammad al-Yaghisiyani is known throughout
simply as ‘al-Yaghisiyani’ so as to avoid any confusion with anyone else who
bears the title Salah al-Din (there are many) or the name Muhammad (even
more).
I have dispensed with all diacritical marks – the dots and dashes that scholars
often add to letters to render the sounds of Arabic into our alphabet; my
assumption has been that non-specialists won’t miss these and that specialists
won’t need them. The exceptions are the Arabic letters ‘ayn, which represents a
distinctive constricting at the back of the throat, and hamza, a glottal-stop. These
are indicated by single opening and closing quotations marks, respectively. I
have taken a similar approach with calendrical matters. Usama of course
reckoned time according to the Muslim calendar, which is lunar. As a result,
relative to the Common Era calendar used by most readers today, the months do
not have solid equivalents to solar months and Muslim holidays are movable
feasts. I have retained the Muslim dates as Usama expressed them, but they are
followed immediately by their equivalent in Common Era dates in parentheses.
All references to the Qur’an refer to the translation of M. A. S. Abdel-Haleem,
The Qur’an (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004).
Finally, it was customary in Usama’s day to include conventionalized
parenthetical blessings when mentioning certain figures like God, the Prophet,
or, most commonly, any dearly departed acquaintance or kinsman (may God
have mercy upon him’ or the like). There were conventionalized curses, too, for
the damned (like the Franks). I have retained all of these, despite their repetitive
nature, lest, after all my concessions to readability, I receive my own
parenthetical curses from my peers.
Other Excerpts
§ Introduction
§ The Haughtiness of Horsemen
§ Malik al-Ashtar and Abu Musayka
§ A’Master’s Blow’ is Not what it Seems
§ Usama Deals a Deceptive Blow
§ Varieties of God’s Will: The Opposing Fates of a Warrior and an Artisan
§ Thief-Stories: The Bandit al-Zamarrakal Belittles his Wounds
§§ Mu’in al-Din’s Tale concerning al-Zamarrakal
§§ A Prized Horse is Stolen and then Given Away
§ A Soldier Killed by a Chisel-Headed Arrow
§ A Warlord Killed by a Trifling Wound
§ A Spectacular Spear-Thrust
§ A Warrior’s Wedding Garb Proves Fatal
§ An Aged Retainer Strikes a Devastating Blow
§ Two Horsemen Felled with one Blow
§ A Reminiscence about that Aged Retainer
§ Usama’s Father: A Great Warrior who Died in his Bed
§§ Digression: Usama’s Father, the Pious Calligrapher
§ The Model of a Loyal Servant
§ A Spear in the Eye
§ Tales of Bravery: Usama’s Uncle and Father
§ Jum’a al-Numayri Rescues his Son from the Franks
§ A Lesson in Humility
§ The Body Cured by Illness
§ Another Wound Heals a Servant
§ More than Meets the Eye: A Frank Miraculously Recovers
§ Jum’a Flees from Battle
§ Usama Gratefully Fails to Kill two Foes
§ Jum’a Accused of Cowardice
§ The Status of the Knight among the Franks
§ An Encounter with Tancred of Antioch
§ One Frankish Knight Routs Four Muslim Horsemen
§ A Lone Knight Thwarts the Army of Mawdud
§ One Man Defeats Many: Two Examples
§§ Digression: A Bridal Surprise
§ A Woman’s Ruse Saves the Day
§ Single-Handed Feats at the Battle of Kafartab
§ A Soldier from Shayzar Attacks a Frankish Caravan
§ A Group of Soldiers is Forced by one Man to Flee
§ One Man Captures a Fort by Treachery
§ The Value of one Good Man: The Case of Yunan of Tripoli
§ Relief after Misfortune: Escape from a Frankish Prison
§ Usama Ransoms Muslim Captives at Acre
§ An Amazing Escape: Conspiracy at Amid
§ Saved from the Jaws of a Lion
§§ On Reason and Warfare
§ Examples of Ignorance: Playing with Fire
§ An Example of Reason: A Soldier Fends off a Lion
§ On Reason and Governance: The Cases of Shayzar and Diyar Bakr
§ Good Governance Offers Rich Rewards: The Cases of Bitlis and Qala’at
Ja’bar
§ Neither Courage nor Strength is Proof against Fate
§ Examples of God’s Benevolence: An Ascetic is Concealed from the Franks
§ God’s Benevolence: A Prisoner of the Byzantines is Freed
§ An Angel Rescues Usama
§ A Vision of the Prophet Rescues a Prisoner
§ Motives for Fighting: Two Muslim Martyrs during the Second Crusade
§ Fighting from a Sense of Commitment: Faris the Kurd
§ Speaking of Horses: Stout-Hearted Steeds
§ Faint-Hearted Horses
§ Another Stout-Hearted Horse
§ Usama Receives a Gift-Horse
§§ Digression: Testing Usama’s Presence of Mind
§§ Digression: Usama’s Father Encourages him
§ The Varieties of Creation: A Soldier Dies from a Trifling Wound
§ A Man Foretells his own Death by a Hornet-Sting
§ Another Predicts a Lion will Seek him Out
§ Lions have their Braves and Cowards too: Three Stalwart Specimens
§ A Cowardly Lion
§ A Dog Attacks a Lion
§ Lions Induce Fear in other Beasts
§ A Lion-Slayer Killed by a Scorpion
§ Observations on the Behaviour of Lions
§ Usama Helps Kill a Leopard
§ The Holy-Warrior Leopard
§ Cheetahs versus Leopards: Let the Buyer Beware
§ A Leopard Runs Amok at a Drinking-Party
§ An Encounter with a ‘Tiger’
§ A Marvel of Destiny: The Byzantine Siege of Shayzar
§ The Franks March on Damascus
§ A Kurd Takes his Brother’s Head as a Trophy
§ Tales of Sharp Swords: Isma’ilis Attack Shayzar
§ How the Sword al-Jami’i got its Name
§ Another Noteworthy Sword-Blow: The Lord of Abu Qubays
§ A Brief Exposition on the Franks of Antioch
§ Roger of Antioch and the Field of Blood
§ Tughdakin Beheads Robert FitzFulk after the Second Battle of Danith
§ Baldwin II Becomes Regent of Antioch
§ Bohemond II Arrives and Becomes Lord of Antioch
§ Bohemond II Misses an Opportunity
§ Deeds of Women: Burayka, the Witch of Shayzar
§ The Bravery of Usama’s Aunt
§ Women’s Courage for the Sake of Honour: Usama’s Mother
§ Women’s Disdain for Danger
§ The Wisdom of Women: Usama’s Grandmother and the Lion
§ A Courageous Woman Kills her Bandit Husband
§ A Frankish Woman Fights Back
§ Intrepid Women: A Shayzari Woman Captures Frankish Pilgrims
§ Franks do not Mix: From Queen-Mother to Shoemaker’s Wife
§ A Frank Converts to Islam, Temporarily
§ The ‘Wonders’ of the Frankish Race
§ The Franks’ Lack of Intelligence: An Invitation to Visit Europe
§ The Marvels of Frankish Medicine
§ Newly Arrived Franks are the Roughest
§ When God was Young
§ Franks have no Honour or Propriety
§ Another Example of their Medicine
§ Two Old Women Race
§ Examples of Frankish Jurisprudence
§ Franks that are Acclimatized are Better
§ Brave Men may Hold Unusual Fears
§ The Devil is in the Details
§ A Lion-Slayer Wounded by a Hyena
§ Faint-Hearted Men
§ Stout-Hearted Men
§ Only God can Bring Victory in Battle
§ Overawing the Enemy in War
§ Risk-Taking: A Warrior’s Duty
§ The Brutality of al-Yaghisiyani
§ Bravery Saves the Day
§ Night-Wanderings: Reflections on Old Age
§ Fate can neither be Hastened nor Slowed
§ In Praise of Saladin
§ Introduction
§ The Miracle of the Sweet-Wrapper
§ Holy Man’s Last Request
§ Similar Tale
§ Miraculous Messenger
§ cured by ‘Ali in a Dream
§ The Prophet Appears in a Poor Man’s Dreams
§ The Prophet Appears in another Dream
§ Another Cure by ‘Ali in a Dream
§ A Good Deed is Amply Rewarded
§ Raw Egg Cures a Boil
§ Raven-Flesh Cures a Hernia
§ Some Cures from Ibn Butlan
§ Usama’s Cure for the Common Cold
§ Another Cure from a Dream
§ Introduction
§ Usama’s Father
§ Hunting with Zangi
§ Hunting in the Principality of Damascus
§ Hunting in Egypt
§ Hunting in Frankish Acre
§ Hunting at Hisn Kayfa
§ Hunting with Nur al-Din
§ Usama’s Father as a Huntsman
§ Al-Yahshur: A Very Special Hawk
§ An Exceptional Cheetah
§ Other Remarkable Birds of Prey
§ Hunting-Dogs
§ The Hunt Must Go On
§ Arab Horses versus Common Hackneys
§ A Scholar Tries to Save a Partridge
§ Lu’lu’ and the Hares
§ Amazing Bird-Stories
§ The Skill of Shayzar’s Fishermen
§ Ghana’im the Austringer
§ Hunting Wild Asses
§ Animals are also Subject to Fate
§ Hunting Wild Boar
§ The Stamina of Butrus
§ Zaghariya-Hounds and Sakers in Tandem
§ The Strong Prey upon the Weak
§ Concluding Reflections
The End of the Book
PART I GREAT EVENTS AND CALAMITIES
DURING MY LIFE
After this, in the year 532 (1138), the king of the Romans6 went out again into
our lands. He and the Franks (may God forsake them) made an alliance agreeing
to march on Shayzar together and besiege it.
Al-Yaghisiyani7 said to me, ‘Now what do you think about what this mother-
bereaving boy has done?’ By this he meant his own son, Shihab al-Din Ahmad.
‘And what has he done?’ I asked.
He said, ‘He sent a messenger to me saying, “You’d better find someone else
to take charge of your lands.”’8
‘So what did you do?’ I asked.
‘I sent a messenger to the atabeg,’ he replied, ‘and said, “I give the place back
to you.”’
‘What a frightful thing you’ve done!’ I said. ‘Won’t the atabeg now just say to
you, “When it was meat you ate of it, but when it was bone you threw it back to
me”?’
‘So what should I do?’ he asked.
‘I will go set myself up in Shayzar,’ I replied. ‘If God (may He be exalted)
should rescue it, then it will be because of your good fortune, and this will
redound to your glory before your lord; and if the place is taken and we are slain,
it will merely be our just fate, and you will not be blamed.’
He said, ‘You are the only one who has ever said such a thing to me.’
I assumed that he would keep to this plan, so I gathered together sheep, a large
amount of flour, butter and whatever someone under siege might need. However,
at sunset, while I was in my house, his messenger came to me and said, ‘Al-
Yaghisiyani says to you: “After daybreak we leave for Mosul,9 so prepare your
things for travel.” ‘
At this, I was overcome with anxiety, and I said, ‘Shall I travel to Mosul and
leave my sons and brothers and household to be put under siege?’
The next morning, I rose and rode to al-Yaghisiyani at [3] his tent and asked
his permission to return to Shayzar to collect some supplies and money that we
would need on the road. He permitted this, but said, ‘Don’t take too long.’ So I
rode out and reached Shayzar.10 But in the meantime he did something that broke
my heart and inflamed my suspicion: he moved quickly and sent men to my
house and took up all the tents, weapons and baggage that were there, seized
most of those beloved to me and tracked down my companions. It was an
immense and frightful disaster.[4]
Bad blood and dissension broke out among the black troops,20who comprised
a large body of men. On one side were the Rayhaniya, who were the slaves of al-
Hafiz. On the other side were the Juyushiya, Iskandraniya and Farahiya
regiments. So the Rayhaniya were on one side and all of these other regiments
were on the other side, allied against the Rayhaniya. A group of the royal
bodyguard also joined the Rayhaniya. Both factions assembled a large body of
men. Al-Hafiz was overwhelmed by all this,21 and his messengers went back and
forth between them, for he was eager [7] to reconcile them. But the troops, who
were in the same part of town as he was, would not agree to this. The next
morning, the two sides fought in Cairo, and the Juyushiya and their companions
were victorious over the Rayhaniya. Of this latter group a thousand men were
killed in the market of Amir al-Juyush; their corpses blocked up the market
street. As for us, we stayed armed night and day for fear the troops might turn
against us – for they had done just such a thing before I came up to Egypt.
After the Rayhaniya were massacred, the populace assumed that al-Hafiz
would condemn the action and set upon their murderers, but he was ill, on the
verge of death. He died (may God have mercy upon him) two days later, and as a
result not even two goats locked horns over it all.22
Al-Zafir, al-Hafiz’s youngest child, took the throne after al-Hafiz. He chose as
his vizier Ibn Masal,23 who was an old man of some stature. At that particular
time, the amir Ibn al-Sallar24(may God have mercy upon him) was off in his
province. There, he mustered troops, gathered them together and set off for
Cairo, sending word ahead to his residence there.
Al-Zafir called a meeting of all his amirs in the Vizierate Assembly-Hall,
sending to us the chief prefect, who said: ‘Amirs, this Ibn Masal is my vizier and
my deputy. Let he who obeys me obey him also and follow his orders.’
The amirs responded: ‘We are the slaves of our lord, hearing, obeying.’ The
prefect returned to the palace with this response.
At that, one of the amirs, an old man called Lakrun, said, ‘Amirs, are we to
abandon Ibn al-Sallar to be murdered?’
They replied, ‘No, by God!’
‘Then get up!’ he said.
At this, they all rushed out of the palace, saddled up their horses and mules and
left to give aid to Ibn al-Sallar. When al-Zafir saw that, and it became clear that
he could not resist him, he gave a large sum of money to Ibn Masal, saying, ‘Go
out to al-Hawf,25 collect men, muster troops, distribute cash among them and
repulse Ibn al-Sallar!’ And so Ibn Masal went to do just that.
[8] Meanwhile, Ibn al-Sallar arrived in Cairo and entered the Vizierate Palace.
The garrison agreed to follow him and he treated them well. He ordered me and
my companions to lodge in his residence, and set aside a part of it for my own
private use. Ibn Masal was in al-Hawf, where he assembled a large host of
Lawata,26 men from the Egyptian garrison, black troops and Bedouin. In the
meantime, ‘Abbas (a stepson of Ibn al-Sallar)27went out and set up camp on the
outskirts of the city. The next morning, a band of Lawata tribesmen led by a
relative of Ibn Masal headed out for ‘Abbas’s camp. A portion of ‘Abbas’s
Egyptian troops deserted him, but he, his bodyguard and those from the garrison
who remained loyal to him stayed fighting through the night of this treacherous
ruse.
News of this reached Ibn al-Sallar, who summoned me that night as I was
staying with him in his residence. Those dogs’, he said (meaning the Egyptian
troops), ‘kept the amir (meaning Abbas) busy with nonsense so that a group of
Lawata could swim across to him. Then they deserted him, some of them even
going back to their homes in Cairo, and the amir was left fighting!’
I said, ‘My lord, we will ride out against them at dawn. By the time the sun has
risen, we will be done with them, if God the Exalted so wills it.’
‘Right!’ he said. ‘Start out early on your ride.’
So we set out against them early the next morning; none escaped except for
those who swam across the Nile with their horses. The relative of Ibn Masal was
captured and executed.
The army then joined forces with ‘Abbas, and he sent it against Ibn Masal. He
met the enemy near Dalas28 and shattered them, killing Ibn Masal. Seventeen
thousand black troops and others were killed. They carried the head of Ibn Masal
back to Cairo. No one remained to oppose or contend with Ibn al-Sallar. Al-Zafir
invested him with the robes of the vizierate and granted him the title ‘al-Malik
al-’Adil’,29 and he now had full charge of affairs.
[9] Mind you, as al-Zafir did this he was all the while turned against Ibn al-
Sallar in loathing, secretly wishing him evil. Al-Zafir decided to murder him and
so hatched a plot with a group of the caliphal bodyguard and others whom he
won over with bribes, ordering that they besiege Ibn al-Sallar’s palace and kill
him. It was the month of Ramadan, and the group of plotters had assembled in a
house near Ibn al-Sallar’s palace, biding their time until midnight when his
companions would be dispersed.
I happened to be with him that night.30 One of the conspirators had informed
Ibn al-Sallar of the plot, so after his guests had finished with dinner and had
gone, he summoned two of his attendants and ordered them to attack the house
in which the conspirators were assembled. This house, since God desired some
to be spared, had two doors: one close to the palace of Ibn al-Sallar, the other
further away. The first group of Ibn al-Sallar’s men attacked the nearer door
before their companions had reached the other door, so the conspirators fled,
escaping through that door. Of these, about ten of the caliphal bodyguard who
were friends of my attendants came to me that night and we hid them. The town
awoke the next morning in the midst of a search for those who had fled; whoever
was caught was killed.
One amazing thing that I saw that day was a man from the cohort of black
troops involved in the conspiracy who fled to the roof of my house, with men
wielding swords right behind him. He looked down into the courtyard from that
great height. In the yard there was a tall lote tree.31 So he jumped from the roof
onto that tree, steadied himself on it, then climbed down and went via a
passageway into a nearby sitting-room where he knocked over a brass candle-
holder and broke it, then went on further to a spot behind a load of baggage that
was in the sitting-room and hid himself there. The men pursuing him were
looking down from above, so I yelled at them and sent up [10] my attendants to
confront them and they drove them away. I then went inside to see the black
soldier.
He threw off a cloak he had with him, saying, ‘Take it. It’s yours.’
To this I replied, ‘May God increase your bounty: I have no need of it.’ And so
I sent him out, accompanied by a group of my attendants, and he was saved.
I sat down on a stone bench in the vestibule of my house, when a young man
entered, greeted me and sat down. I found him to be well spoken and a charming
conversationalist. But as he was conversing, a man came calling for him and so
he went away with him. I therefore sent an attendant of mine after him to find
out why he was called away (I was then living near the palace of Ibn al-Sallar).
The moment that young man presented himself before Ibn al-Sallar, the latter
ordered his head to be cut off, and so he was killed. My attendant came back. He
had inquired into the young man’s crime and he was told that he used to issue
forged documents. Glory be to He who determines the length of our days and
fixes the moment of our death! During this period of strife, a number of
Egyptian and black troops were killed.
Ibn al-Sallar (may God have mercy upon him) ordered me to prepare for a
journey to Nur al-Din32 (may God have mercy upon him). He said, ‘You will
take with you treasure and go to him to persuade him to besiege Tiberias33 and
keep the Franks occupied so that we can set out from here and lay waste to
Gaza.’34
The Franks (may God confound them) had just started to rebuild Gaza so that
they might blockade Ascalon.35
I said, ‘My lord, if he refuses your request or if he has other pressing concerns
that prevent him from doing so, what are your orders?’
He replied, ‘If he lays siege to Tiberias, then give him the treasure that you
have with you. But if there is something that prevents him, then enlist as many
soldiers as you can from his army and go up to Ascalon, establishing yourself
there to combat the Franks. Once you arrive, write to me and I will send you
orders about what you should do next.’
He then gave me six thousand Egyptian dinars and a camel-load of clothes of
[11] Dabiqi cloth, ciclatoun, squirrel-fur, Dimyati brocade and turbans.36 He also
assigned a group of Bedouin to me to act as guides. And so I set out, he having
dispelled all obstacles to my travel by seeing to all my needs, great or small.
As we approached al-Jafr,37 my guides said to me, ‘This place is rarely free of
Franks.’
So I ordered two of the guides riding Mahri camels38 to go ahead of us to al-
Jafr. Yet no sooner had they departed than they returned, their Mahri camels
flying, saying, ‘The Franks are at al-Jafr!’
So, I stopped, assembled the camels that were carrying my luggage and certain
members of the party travelling with me and sent them back westward.
I then chose six horsemen from my mamluk-troops39 and said, ‘You go ahead
of us and I’ll be right behind you.’ So they went galloping off while I went
behind them.
One of them returned to me and said, ‘There isn’t anyone at al-Jafr. Maybe
what they had seen were Bedouin.’ He and the guides then began arguing. I sent
someone to go and collect the camels and continued on my way.
When I arrived at al-Jafr (where there is water, green herbage and trees), there
appeared from the undergrowth a man wearing a black outer-garment. We
captured him and my companions then fanned out and captured another man,
two women and some youngsters. One of the women came forward and grabbed
my garment and said, ‘Sheikh, I am at your mercy!’
I said, ‘You are free. What is the matter with you?’
‘Your companions’, she replied, ‘have taken of mine a garment, a brayer, a
barker and a bead.’40
I said to my attendants, ‘Whoever has taken anything, give it back.’
[12] So an attendant came and presented a piece of cloth of maybe two cubits
in length.
‘That’s the garment,’ she said.
Another one came and presented a piece of sandarach resin.41 ‘That’s the bead,’
she said.
‘What about the donkey and the dog?’ I asked.
As for the donkey, they said that they had tied up his forelegs and hind legs,
and had thrown him to the ground on the grass. As for the dog, it was loose,
running around from place to place.
I then called all these people together and saw that they were in a truly
deplorable state: their skin had dried up around their bones. ‘So,’ I asked them,
‘who are you then?’42
They said, ‘We are of the Banu Ubayy.’
The Banu Ubayy are an Arab clan from the tribe of Tayyi’. They only eat
carrion43 yet go around saying, ‘We are the finest of all the Arabs. You won’t
find among us anyone with elephantiasis, leprosy, blindness or any chronic
disease.’ And if a guest stays with them, they slaughter an animal for him and
feed him with food other than what they eat.
I asked them, ‘What brings you out here?’
They replied, ‘We have heaps of corn buried in the ground in the Hisma,44 and
we have come to collect it.’
‘And how long have you been here?’ I asked.
‘Since the feast of Ramadan’,45 they replied, ‘we have been out here, without
setting eyes on any food.’
‘So what do you live on?’ I said.
‘On carrion,’ they replied (meaning dried-up, thrown-away bones), ‘we crush
them and mix them with water and orach leaves46 (a plant common to those
parts) and we survive on that.’
‘And your dogs and donkeys?’ I asked.
They said, ‘The dogs we feed with our own food and the donkeys eat hay.’
‘So why’, I pressed, ‘don’t you go into Damascus?’
They said, ‘We were afraid of the plague.’
Yet there is no plague greater than the one afflicting them! This took place
after the Feast of Sacrifice.47 We stopped there until our camels came back and I
gave them some of the extra provisions we had with us. I also cut up a cloth I
had been wearing on my head and gave it to the two women. They almost lost
their minds with joy on account of the food. I warned them, ‘Don’t stay here or
else the Franks will capture you.’
[13] One of the amazing things that happened to me during that trip was the
following. One night I dismounted to pray the sunset and dusk prayers (abridged
and combined), when the camels ran off.48 So I stood on a bit of raised ground
and said to my attendants, ‘Go spread out in search of the camels, and then come
back to me. I won’t move from my place.’
They spread out and galloped about this way and that and never laid eyes on
the camels. Then they all came back to me saying, ‘We didn’t find them, and we
don’t know which way they went.’
So I said, ‘We’ll seek assistance from God (may He be exalted) and travel
using the stars to guide us.’
And so we set out, even though, separated in the desert from our camels as we
were, we risked meeting a grim fate indeed.
Now, among our guides was a man called Jazziya, a man of vigilance and
savvy. When he became aware of our tardiness, he realized that we had strayed
off from the rest of the party. So he, while still sitting on his camel, took out his
flint-and-steel and began striking them, the sparks from the flintstone flying this
way and that. As a result, we saw him from far away and headed off in the
direction of the fire until we caught up with the party. Had it not been for God’s
kindness and the inspiration He gave to that man, we would have perished.
§§ A Felonious Mule
Another thing that took place during that trip was the following. Ibn al-Sallar
(may God have mercy upon him) had told me, ‘Don’t let the guides who are with
you know about the treasure.’
So I put four thousand dinars in a saddle-bag on a saddle-mule being led
alongside me and handed him over to an attendant. I also put two thousand
dinars, along with my own petty cash, a bridle and some Maghribi dinars49 in
another saddle-bag on a horse being led alongside me, and I handed it off to
another attendant. Whenever we stopped to camp, I would put the saddle-bags in
the middle of a carpet, fold up its edges on top of them, spread another carpet
over it and sleep on top of the saddle-bags, rising before my companions when it
was time to go. The two attendants who were responsible for the saddlebags
would then come [14] and take charge of them. As soon as they had them tied
onto the two animals alongside me, I would mount up and rouse the rest of my
companions and we would busy ourselves about the departure.
One night, we stopped to camp in the Wilderness of the Children of Israel.50
When I rose to depart, the attendant in charge of the mule being led alongside
me took his saddle-bag, threw it onto the back of the mule and turned around
intending to tighten it down with its strap. But the mule started and then galloped
off with the saddle-bag still on it. At this, I mounted my horse, which the groom
had just brought to me, and shouted to one of my attendants, ‘Saddle up! Saddle
up!’
I galloped off in pursuit of the mule but I didn’t catch up with it, since it was
going like a wild ass. My horse was already exhausted because of the pursuit
when my attendant caught up with me. So I said, ‘Follow the mule that way!’
He left and returned saying, ‘By God, my lord, I didn’t see the mule! But I did
find this saddle-bag, which I picked up.’
‘It was the saddle-bag that I was looking for,’ I replied. ‘The mule is no big
loss.’
So I went back to the camp and what do you know, but the mule had come
galloping back, made its way into the horses’ picket-line and stopped, as if it had
wanted to do nothing else except lose four thousand dinars!
My route took me by the Cave of the Seven Sleepers.57 So I stopped there and
went in to pray at the mosque, but I did not go through the narrow passage that
one finds there. One of the amirs of the Turks who were with me, called
Barshak, came, wanting to enter by that narrow cleft.
I said, ‘What are you doing that for? Come and pray outside.’
‘There is no God but God,’ he replied. ‘I must be a bastard then if I can’t get
through that narrow cleft!’
‘What are you talking about?’ I asked.
He said, ‘This is a place that no son of adultery can pass through – he cannot
enter.’
What he said forced me to get up, enter by that spot, pray and come out again
without – God knows – believing what he said. Indeed, most of the troops came
and entered and prayed. Yet, in the army with me was Baraq al-Zubaydi, who
had with him a slave of his, a black man – devout fellow, taken to praying a lot,
and one of the tallest and leanest people. He came to that spot and tried with all
his might to enter, but he could not get through. The poor fellow wept, moaning
and sighing over and over, and then left after failing to enter.
Al-Zafir now concocted a plan with Nasr, convincing him that, if Nasr killed
his father, al-Zafir would appoint him to the vizierate in his place. He also sent
him generous gifts. One day I was in Nasr’s presence when he received twenty
silver trays holding twenty thousand dinars – a gift from the caliph. Then the
caliph ignored him for a few days, only to send him every variety of clothing,
the likes of which I had never seen before in one collection. Then he ignored him
again for a few days, later sending him fifty silver trays holding fifty thousand
dinars. And then he ignored him yet again for a few days, later sending him
thirty baggage mules and forty camels with all their tack, bags and ropes.68 [20]
The one who used to act as go-between for them was a man named Murtafa’ ibn
Fahl. During this whole period, I was with Nasr all the time. He wouldn’t permit
me to be absent night or day; I used to sleep with my head at the end of his
pillow.
I was with him one night at the Shabura Palace, when that Murtafa’ ibn Fahl
came and talked with him through the first third of the night. I kept away.
Murtafa’ then withdrew and Nasr called me to him and asked, ‘Where have you
been?’
‘By the window,’ I replied, ‘reading the Qur’an. I really didn’t have time to
read from it all day.’
He then began to open up to me about what he was planning, so that he might
get a sense of where I stood on the matter, hoping I would strengthen his resolve
to do the evil deed that al-Zafir had persuaded him to do.
So I said to him, ‘My lord, let not Satan make you stray, and be not beguiled
by him who would delude you! For killing your father is not like killing Ibn al-
Sallar. Do not do anything that will leave you damned until the Day of
Judgment.’69
At this, he lowered his head, cut short our conversation and we went to sleep.
He later acquainted his father with the whole affair. So the latter behaved kindly
towards him, won him over – and plotted with him to murder al-Zafir.
Al-Zafir and Nasr were the same age, and they used to go out together at night
in disguise. So Nasr invited the caliph over to his house, which was by the
Sword-Makers’ Market, having set up a band of his companions in one side of
the house. As soon as the caliph was all settled in the sitting-room, Nasr’s men
rushed out at him and killed him. That was Wednesday night, the last day of
Muharram of the year 549 (15 April 1154). They threw him into a deep well in
Nasr’s house. A black servant of the caliph’s had accompanied him, a man called
Sa’id al-Dawla, who never used to leave his side. They killed him too.
The next morning, Thursday, ‘Abbas went to the palace as usual to give his
greetings and took a seat in a side-chamber in the Vizierate Assembly-Hall as if
he were waiting for al-Zafir to come and hold audience and receive greetings.
When the time during which the caliph usually held audience had elapsed,
‘Abbas summoned the chief prefect and said, ‘Why has our lord not held
audience to receive the customary greetings?’
The prefect was at a loss to reply.
‘Abbas shouted at him, ‘What’s with you that you don’t answer me?’
The prefect replied, ‘My lord, we don’t know where our lord is!’
‘Would someone like our lord just go missing?’ ‘Abbas countered. ‘Go back
and see what’s going on.’
So he left, then came back and told him, ‘We couldn’t find our lord.’
At this ‘Abbas said, ‘The [21] people cannot remain without a caliph. Go in to
the lords, his brothers, and bring out one of them so we can pledge our
allegiance to him.’
So the prefect left, then came back and said, ‘The lords say to you, “We have
nothing to say about the matter of the caliphal office. Al-Zafir’s father cut us out
of it, and established it with al-Zafir, and so the office belongs to his son after
him.” ‘
‘Abbas replied, ‘Then bring him out so that we can pledge our allegiance.’
‘Abbas, having murdered al-Zafir, decided to claim that the caliph’s own
brothers had killed him and to have them killed because of it. The son of al-
Zafir70 now appeared, a mere infant, carried on the shoulders of one of the
household managers of the palace. ‘Abbas took him up and carried him, as the
people wept. Carrying him, he went inside with him, to the boy’s father’s
audience-chamber, where now stood the sons of al-Hafiz:71 the amir Yusuf, the
amir Jibril and their nephew, the amir Abu al-Baqa. We were sitting in the
portico, with more than a thousand Egyptian troops in the palace, when we were
surprised to see a bunch of men burst out of the audience-chamber into the hall,
and then to hear the sounds of swords striking someone. So I said to one of the
attendants, an Armenian, ‘Go and see who was killed.’ And off he went.
When he came back he told me, ‘Those men are no Muslims! That was my
lord Abu al-Amana they just killed (meaning the amir Jibril)! One of them cut
open his stomach and was yanking out his intestines!’
Then ‘Abbas came out, dragging the amir Yusuf, the latter’s naked head
clenched under his armpit. He had already struck Yusuf with a sword, for blood
was pouring out of him.72 Abu al-Baqa, his nephew, was in the hands of Nasr, so
they brought the two of them into a side-chamber in the palace and killed them
there.73 And yet all this occurred while there were a thousand swords unsheathed
in the palace. That day was one of the most disquieting days I have ever lived
through, given all the hideous injustices that occurred, injustices condemned by
God (may He be Exalted) and all His creatures.
[22] One of the amazing things that happened on that day was this: ‘Abbas,
when he tried to go into the audience-chamber, found that its door was locked
from inside. The man whose job it was to open and close the audience-chamber
was an old steward called Amin al-Mulk. They tried the door various ways and
finally opened it. When they went in, they found that steward behind the door,
dead, the keys still in his hand.
Once we had left the Victory Gate behind us, the Arab tribes whom ‘Abbas
had made to swear oaths came together and they fought us from the early
morning hours of Friday79 until Thursday, [26] 20 of Rabi’al-Awwal (29 May-4
June 1154). They spent every daylight hour fighting us. Once night fell and we
encamped, they let us be so that we could sleep, then they would ride at us with
a hundred horsemen, pressing at us with their horses from all sides, raising their
voices in shouts. If any of our horses were startled and ran out to them, they took
it.
One day, I withdrew from my comrades. I was riding a white horse – one of
my worst. The groom had saddled him without knowing what would happen,
and I had no weapons with me except my sword. Suddenly, the Arabs attacked
me, and there I was: I couldn’t find any way to repulse them, my horse couldn’t
help me escape and their arrows started falling on me. I thought to myself, ‘Jump
off the horse, draw your sword, and have at them.’ But as I gathered myself to
jump, my horse stumbled and I fell onto some stones and a patch of rough
ground. A piece of skin from my head was ripped off and I became so dizzy that
I didn’t know where I was. A group of Arabs gathered around me, while I just
sat there, bare-headed, clueless, my sword lying in its scabbard.
One of them struck me twice with his sword, saying, ‘Hand over the dosh!’ but
I didn’t know what he was saying. So they took my horse and my sword.
The Turks caught sight of me and doubled back. Nasr sent me a horse and a
sword, and I set off without having even a bandage to dress my wounds. Glory
be to He whose kingdom lasts forever!
We travelled on, and not one of us carried even a handful of provisions.
Whenever I wanted to drink some water, I would dismount and drink from my
hand. Yet just the night before, I had been sitting on a chair in one of the
antechambers of my house, while some people offered me sixteen camels for
transporting water and however many water-skins and bags God (glory be to
Him) had willed. In the end, I was unable to transport my household, so at
Bilbays I sent everyone back to stay with Ibn Ruzzik (may God have mercy
upon him). He treated them well, let them stay in a house, [27] and granted them
a stipend to cover their needs. Finally, when the Arabs who were fighting us
wanted to go back, they came to us and extracted a pardon from us should we
ever return.
One of the curious things that happened to me during that battle with the
Franks84 happened like this. Al-Zafir had once sent Nasr a small, handsome
Frankish ambler horse. One day, I went out to a village of mine, while my son,
Abu al-Fawaris Murhaf, stayed with Nasr.
The latter said, ‘We need a nice handsome saddle for this ambler, like the
saddles they make in Gaza.’
So my son said, ‘I have already found one, my lord, and it surpasses any you
could desire.’
‘Then where is it?’ he asked.
‘In the house of your servant, my father,’ he replied, ‘for he has a lovely saddle
from Gaza.’
‘Go and bring it here,’ Nasr commanded. So he sent a messenger to my house,
who took the saddle. It pleased Nasr, so he strapped it onto the ambler. That
saddle came with me from Syria on one of those horses that is led alongside. Its
saddlecloth was quilted, fringed in black and exceedingly handsome. It weighed
130 mithqals.85
[29] When I came back from my fief, Nasr said to me, ‘We took the liberty to
take this saddle from your house.’
So I said, ‘My lord, I am happy to be of service to you.’
When the Franks attacked us at al-Muwaylih, I had five of my mamluks with
me on camels, the Arabs having taken their horses earlier. After the Franks
attacked, some of the horses were left behind, roaming at will. So the attendants
dismounted from their camels, intercepted the horses and took however many
they needed to ride. And on one of those horses that they seized was my golden
saddle that Nasr had taken.
Husam al-Mulk86 (the nephew of ‘Abbas) and a brother of ‘Abbas who was a
son of Ibn al-Sallar were both among those with us who survived that battle.
Husam al-Mulk had heard the story of the saddle and said (and I heard him say
this), ‘Everything that belonged to the poor wretch (meaning Nasr) was pillaged,
some of it by the Franks, some of it by his own comrades.’
So I said, ‘Perhaps you are referring to the golden saddle?’
‘Indeed,’ he said.
So I ordered that the saddle be brought forth and I said to him, ‘Read what is
on the saddle-cloth. Is it the name of ‘Abbas and the name of his son, or is it my
name? Who was there in all of Egypt but I who was able to ride in a golden
saddle in the days of al-Hafiz?’ My name was written along the border of the
saddle-cloth in black, and its centre was quilted.
When he read what was on it, he apologized and kept silent.87
Even if the divine will had not been executed on ‘Abbas and his son, and even
if they had not suffered the consequences that they did for their injustice and
ingratitude, ‘Abbas might still have learned a lesson from what had happened
before his time to al-Afdal Ridwan88 (may God have mercy upon him). Ridwan
had once served as vizier when the troops rose against him at the bidding of al-
Hafiz, just as they rose against ‘Abbas, so he fled from Egypt to Syria.
Meanwhile, his palace and private quarters were given up to the most thorough
pillage. Indeed, a man known as Commander Muqbil saw a serving-girl with the
black troops, so he bought her from them and sent her to his house. Now, he had
a righteous wife and she took the serving-girl up to a room in the highest part of
the house.
There she heard the girl say, ‘Perhaps [30] God will make us prevail over those
who treat us so unjustly and who are so ungrateful for our acts of kindness.’89
So the wife asked her, ‘Who are you?’
She replied, ‘I am Qatr al-Nada, daughter of Ridwan.’ The wife then sent a
message to her husband, Commander Muqbil, who was on duty at the palace
gate, summoning him home. She informed him of the girl’s status. In turn, he
wrote a report to al-Hafiz and informed him about it. Al-Hafiz then sent one of
the palace servants, who took her from Muqbil’s house and restored her to the
palace.
[32] It happened that when I first arrived in Cairo,96 he was still in prison in a
house next to the palace. By using an iron spike, he managed to dig a tunnel
fourteen cubits long and escape on Wednesday night.97 One of the amirs, a
relative, knew of his plan. This amir and a henchman of his from the Lawata
tribe were waiting for him by the palace. They all then went towards the Nile
and crossed over into Giza.98 Cairo was all in tumult at his escape. The next
morning, Ridwan appeared in a belvedere in Giza, where the troops assembled
before him. Meanwhile, the Egyptian troops prepared to fight him. Then, early
on Friday morning, he awoke and crossed into Cairo. The Egyptian army was
armed and ready for battle, commanded by Qaymaz, Master of the Gate.99 When
they met, Ridwan routed them and then he entered Cairo.
I had already ridden to the palace gate with my companions before he entered
the city. I found that the gates of the palace were locked and no one was
guarding them. So I returned to my house and stayed there. Ridwan set himself
up in the al-Aqmar Mosque.100 Various amirs came and joined him, bringing him
food and cash. But al-Hafiz had assembled a group of black troops in the palace,
who started drinking and soon became drunk. He had the palace gate opened for
them and they rushed out seeking Ridwan. When the screams of these black
troops reached them, all of the amirs with Ridwan rode off and scattered.
Ridwan went out of the mosque only to find that his groom had stolen his horse
and fled. As a result, one of the men of the caliphal bodyguard saw Ridwan
standing there at the door to the mosque and said, ‘My lord, why don’t you take
my horse?’
‘Indeed,’ Ridwan replied. So the young guardsman galloped up to him, sword
in hand. Then, making as if he was leaning over to dismount, the guardsman
struck Ridwan with his sword and Ridwan fell. Soon, the black troops arrived
and killed him. The Egyptians divided up his flesh and ate it in order to acquire
his valour.101 Thus his story serves as a warning and a lesson from which to learn
by example, even if the divine decree had not been executed.102
[34] I then entered the service of Nur al-Din105 (may God have mercy upon
him). He corresponded with Ibn Ruzzik about transporting my household and
sons who had been left behind in Egypt, and who, I might add, had been treated
very well. But Ibn Ruzzik sent the messenger back and begged off, claiming that
he feared for their safety because of the Franks. He wrote to me, saying, ‘Come
back to Egypt: you know what our relationship is like. If you are expecting any
ill-will from the palace staff, then you can go to Mecca where I will send you a
document granting you the city of Aswan,106 and I will send you all the
reinforcements you need to combat the Abyssinians (for Aswan is one of the
frontier-fortresses of the Muslims). Then I will let your household and sons
come to join you.’
So I consulted with Nur al-Din, seeking his advice on the matter. He said, ‘You
are not seriously considering, having just left behind Egypt and all her troubles,
going back there! Life is too short for that! I’ll send a messenger to the king of
the Franks107 to obtain safe-passage for your household, and I’ll also send
someone along to conduct them here.’ And so he (may God have mercy upon
him) sent a messenger and obtained the safe-passage from the king, with his
cross right on it,108good for both land- and sea-travel.
So I sent along the safe-passage with a servant of mine, as well as a letter from
Nur al-Din and my own letter for Ibn Ruzzik. Ibn Ruzzik then sent my family on
to Damietta in one of his own personal launches, along with all the provisions
and cash they would need, and his own letter of protection. From Damietta, they
sailed in a Frankish ship. As they approached Acre, where the king was (may
God not [35] have mercy upon him), the king sent out a group of men in a small
boat to sink the ship with axes, as my own companions looked on. The king rode
out on his horse, stopped at the shore and took as pillage everything that was in
the ship.
A servant of mine swam across to him, holding the safepassage document, and
said to him, ‘My lord king, is this not your document of safe-passage?’
‘Indeed it is,’ he said. ‘But this is the procedure among the Muslims: if one of
their ships is wrecked off one of their towns, then the inhabitants of that town get
to pillage it.’
My servant then asked, ‘So you are going to take us prisoner?’ ‘No,’ the king
replied, and he had my family (may God curse him) brought to a building, where
he had the women searched and took everything they had with them. In the ship
there had been jewellery that had been entrusted to the women, along with cloth
and gems, swords and other weapons, and gold and silver amounting to
something like thirty thousand dinars. The Franks took it all and then sent my
household five hundred dinars, saying, ‘You can get to your country on this,’
even though the party totalled some fifty men and women.
As for me, I was at that very moment with Nur al-Din in the land of the king
Mas’ud, in the region of Ra’ban and Kaysun.109The news that my children and
my brother’s children and our women were safe made it easier to take the news
about all the wealth that was lost. Except for my books: they totalled four
thousand bound volumes of the most precious tomes. Their loss was for me a
heartache that lasted all my life.
§ Conclusion
These, then, are the kinds of calamities that can the tallest mountain shake,
and the most precious fortune cruelly break. But God (glory be to Him)
recompenses us in His mercy and concludes all things in His kindness and
forgiveness. These were the great events that I witnessed, in addition to the
calamities that I endured, but out of which I emerged safely, according to the
timing as Fate wishes, though I was ruined by the loss of my riches.
PART II WONDERS OF WARFARE, AGAINST
INFIDELS AND MUSLIMS
§ Introduction
[36] In the midst of these events, there were periods when I saw countless
battles against infidels and against Muslims. Of the wonders that I witnessed and
experienced in these various wars, I will mention here only those that come to
mind. For forgetful-ness is not to be disparaged in someone who has seen time
pass without cease; it is indeed a legacy of all sons of Adam passed on from their
father (God’s blessing be upon him, and peace).
One such wonder is what I witnessed of the haughtiness of horsemen and the
way they oblige themselves to face dangers. We were engaged in battle with
Mahmud ibn Qaraja,1 the lord of Hama at the time, and the fighting between us
was having no result,2 the contingents of infantry standing at the ready while the
melee carried on between the fast cavalry.
One of our men came up to me, a celebrated soldier and horseman called
Jum’a, of the Banu Numayr tribe, and he was crying. So I asked him, ‘What’s
the matter with you, Jum’a? Is this really the time to be crying?’
He replied, ‘Sarhank ibn Abi Mansur stabbed me with his spear!’
‘What if Sarhank did stab you,’ I asked, ‘so what?’
‘So nothing,’ he said, ‘except for being hit by someone like Sarhank! By God,
death would be easier for me than to have been hit by him! But he tricked me
and took me by surprise.’
I then started to quieten him down and make light of the matter to him, but he
turned the head of his horse around and headed back towards the melee.
‘Where are you going, Jum’a?’ I asked.
‘To Sarhank!’ he replied. ‘By God, I’ll stab him good or die trying!’
He disappeared for a time, while I was busy with the enemy facing me. Then
he came back laughing, so I asked him, ‘What [37] did you do?’
‘I stabbed him!’ he replied. ‘And, by God, if I hadn’t stabbed him, my soul
would have withered.’
He had attacked him while Sarhank was with a group of his companions, and
then he came back. It is as if the poet had Sarhank and Jum’a in mind when he
said:
You do not even think, so great is your benevolence, Of the thirsty avenger
who is conscious of his inheritance.
Indeed, you doze yourself and awaken further his ire For he slept not; how
could he, given his desire?
Now, one day, it may be Time’s pleasure To let him mete out to you an extra
measure.3
This Sarhank was a noteworthy horseman, a leader among the Kurds. But he
was just a youngster, whereas Jum’a was a mature man, distinguished by his age
and his experience in acts of courage.
Another case that I witnessed of the recovery of someone who had been
stabbed, and who had been expected to die, happened as follows. We
encountered the advance cavalry of Mahmud ibn Qaraja, who had come into our
territory and set up an ambush against us. Once our infantry and his were drawn
up at the ready, our cavalry dispersed.
A horseman from our army called ‘Ali ibn Sallam al-Numayri came up to me
and said, ‘Our companions have dispersed. If the enemy attacks them, they will
annihilate them.’
‘Hold back my brothers and cousins,’ I offered, ‘so that I can bring the men
back alone.’
So he told them, ‘Amirs, let this man bring the horsemen back, and do not
follow him. For if you do, the enemy will attack them and dislodge them.’
‘Go ahead,’ they replied and I galloped off on my horse to bring them back.
The enemy were keeping away from them in order to draw them further out and
then overpower them.
When the enemy saw that I was bringing the horsemen back, they attacked us.
Their ambush-party also came out against us, while I remained behind some
distance from my companions. So I turned back to confront the ambush-party,
wanting to defend the rear of my companions. But I found that my cousin, Layth
al-Dawla Yahya (may God have mercy upon him), had already circled back
behind his companions from the southern side of the road while I was to its
north. So we went at them.
Now one of their horsemen, called Faris ibn Zimam, who was an Arab and a
renowned cavalier, rushed past us wanting to put his spear [39] into our
companions. But my cousin beat me to him and thrust his spear at him. Both
Faris and his horse fell to the ground and my cousin’s spear exploded with such
a loud noise that I and everyone else could hear it.
Now, my father (may God have mercy upon him) had earlier sent a messenger
to Mahmud ibn Qaraja, and Mahmud brought the messenger with him when he
set out to attack us. And so, when Faris ibn Zimam was speared, and Mahmud
did not get what he wanted from us, he sent that messenger from where he was
with an answer to the message that my father had sent him to deliver in the first
place, and returned to Hama.6 So I asked the messenger, ‘Did Faris ibn Zimam
die?’
‘No,’ he replied. ‘By God, he wasn’t even wounded! Layth al-Dawla thrust his
spear at him – and I saw him do it – and threw Faris and his horse to the ground.
And I heard the noise of the spear breaking, too. But what happened was that
when Layth al-Dawla struck at him from the left, Faris inclined to the right side,
his quntariya-spear7 gripped in his hand. As a result, his horse fell upon his
quntariya-spear, while the spear happened to be poised spanning a ditch, and it
snapped. Layth al-Dawla tried to hit Faris from behind with his spear, but it fell
from his hand. So what you heard was the noise from the quntariya-spear of
Faris ibn Zimam. As for the spear of Layth al-Dawla, they brought it before
Mahmud ibn Qaraja while I was present, and it was completely intact, not a
scratch on it, and Faris hadn’t even a wound on him.’
I was amazed that he was safe at all. That spear-thrust was like the ‘master’s
blow’ that ‘Antara speaks of:
The horsemen and even the horses know
That I smote their host with a master’s blow.
The entire enemy contingent, including the ambush-party, retreated without
having accomplished anything they had wanted. The verse I just quoted above is
from some verses by ‘Antara ibn Shaddad,8 who says in them:
I am a man, one part from Abs’s line nobly made, The other part, this I
protect with my naked blade.
When the war-band looks about and makes to run and hide,
I best those men who in all their uncles take such pride.
If Death could be depicted, it would wear my face, Should those men ever
find themselves in a hard, tight place.
The horsemen and even the horses know That I smote their host with a
master’s blow.
They challenged me to dismount – I was the first to land: For why would I
ride a horse if I could never stand?
I witnessed a similar thing with regard to Mahmud ibn Qaraja. The conflict
between him and us having been settled, he had sent a message to my uncle
saying, ‘Tell Usama [47] to meet me with one horseman at Kar’a,40 so that we
can go and look for a place where we can lie in ambush against Apamea, and
then we can make an attack on it.’ My uncle told me, so I rode out and met
Mahmud and reconnoitred the various spots.
Then we combined his army and ours, with me leading the army of Shayzar
and Mahmud ibn Qaraja at the head of his army, and we set out for Apamea. We
encountered the enemy cavalry and infantry in the ruins near the city. It is a
place where horses cannot easily move because of all the blocks and columns
and ruined foundations, so we were unable to dislodge them from the area. But
then one of our soldiers asked me, ‘Do you want to rout them?’
‘Yes, I do,’ I replied.
‘Then lead us off towards the gate of the citadel,’ he said.
‘Let’s go,’ I said.
But the soldier who had made this suggestion soon regretted it when he
realized that the enemy would be able to charge through us and beat us to the
citadel. He tried to dissuade me from going, but I refused and set off for the gate.
The moment the Franks saw us heading for the gate, their cavalry and infantry
turned back towards us, charged through us and beat us there. The horsemen
dismounted inside the gate of the citadel, sent their mounts further up into it and
lined up the points of their quntariya-spears in a row across the gate. Meanwhile,
I, with a comrade of mine – one of my father’s mamluks (may God have mercy
upon him), whose name was Rafi’ ibn Sutakin – was standing under the wall
across from the gate, with quite a lot of stones and arrows raining down upon us.
Mahmud ibn Qaraja, for his part, out of fear of the Kurds,41 was positioned far
from the Franks at the head of a war-band. One of our comrades, called Haritha
al-Numayri, a relative of Jum’a,42 received a spear-thrust crossways clear
through the chest of his horse. The quntariya-spear stuck into the horse, which
struggled until the spear fell out. The skin from the horse’s chest fell forwards
and stayed there, hanging on its forelegs.
As for Mahmud ibn Qaraja, he was far removed from the combat, but an arrow
flew from the citadel and struck him on the side of his forearm-bone, yet it did
not pierce the arm-bone so much as the length of a barley-grain. So [48] his
messenger came to me to tell me on his behalf, ‘Maintain your position until you
can assemble all our men who are scattered across the area. I am wounded and
feel as if the wound were in my heart. I am withdrawing, so it is up to you to
protect the men.’ And so he withdrew while I led the men away and encamped at
Burj al-Khurayba.43 The Franks used to station a sentinel there to be able to spot
us whenever we made a raid on Apamea. Late that afternoon, I arrived at
Shayzar and Mahmud ibn Qaraja was in my father’s residence, trying to unwrap
his wound to treat it, but my uncle forbade him to do so saying, ‘By God, do not
unwrap your wound until you get to your own house.’
‘But I am in the home of my father,’44 he protested, meaning my own father
(may God have mercy upon him).
‘Yes, well,’ my uncle replied, ‘when you’ve got back to your house and your
wound has healed, then the home of your father will be at your disposal.’
And so at sunset, Mahmud ibn Qaraja rode off to Hama. He remained there the
next day and the day after, but then his hand turned black, he lost consciousness
and died. This all happened to him simply because his time had come.
§ A Spectacular Spear-Thrust
One of the most spectacular spear-thrusts that I witnessed was inflicted by a
horseman from the Franks (may God confound them) on a horseman from our
troops, called Sabah ibn Qunayb – from the Kilab tribe. It cut through three rib-
bones on his left side and then through three on his right.45 Finally, the sharp
edge of the spear-head struck his elbow-joint, splitting it in two just like a
butcher does with a joint of meat. He died instantly.
§ A Warrior’s Wedding Garb Proves Fatal
One of the most amazing spear-thrusts occurred with a Kurdish soldier called
Hamadat, a long-time comrade who had travelled with my father (may God have
mercy upon him) to Isfahan to the court of the sultan Malikshah.50 But now he
had grown old, raised children, and his eyesight was weak.
My uncle Sultan (may God have mercy upon him) said to him, ‘Hamadat, you
have become old and feeble, and we owe you many favours as you have served
us well. If you retire to your mosque (for he had a mosque by the door to his
house) and let us register your children in the stipend-list, then you will get two
dinars every month and a load of flour, so long as you stick to your mosque.’
‘I’ll do it, sir,’ he said.
But the deal only lasted a short time. For he later came to my uncle and said,
‘Sir, by God, I can’t get used to just sitting [50] around the house. I would rather
be killed on my horse than die in my bed.’
‘It’s up to you,’ my uncle replied, and gave orders that his name be registered
like it used to be.
Only a few days passed before the Cerdagnais,51 the lord of Tripoli attacked us.
The soldiers rushed to confront them, and Hamadat was among the most
courageous group. He positioned himself on some raised ground, facing south,
but a Frankish horseman attacked him from the west. One of our comrades
shouted at him, ‘Hamadat!’ so he turned and saw the horseman headed for him.
He pointed the head of his horse northward, hefted his spear in his hand and
thrust it straight into the chest of the Frank, the spear piercing him right through.
The Frank retreated clasping his horse’s neck, breathing his last.
When the fighting ended, Hamadat said to my uncle, ‘Tell me, sir: if Hamadat
had kept to his mosque, who would have struck that blow?’
This reminds me of the verse of al-Find al-Zimmani:52
Behold the blow of an old man, ground down and worn,
While my peers shun weapons, this makes me feel reborn!
This al-Find was already an old man when he went to battle and struck with his
spear two approaching horsemen and killed them both together.
Indeed, something like that had happened just previously. A peasant farmer
from al-’Ala53 came galloping to my father and uncle (may God have mercy
upon them both), and told them, I saw a detachment of Franks coming from the
direction of the desert – they’ve lost their way. If you march out against them,
you’ll be able to take them.’
So my father and my two uncles departed at the head of a body of troops to
confront that lost detachment, and who should it be but the Cerdagnais, the lord
of Tripoli, at the head [51] of three hundred horsemen and two hundred
Turcopoles54(those are archers for the Franks). Once they saw our comrades,
they mounted their horses, charged at our comrades and routed them. They then
stuck to their trail. A mamluk belonging to my father, called Yaqut the Tall,
circled back around towards them while my father and uncle (may God have
mercy upon them both) watched him. He thrust his spear at one of their
horsemen who was alongside another of their knights (for they were both
pursuing our comrades), and struck down both horses and horsemen at the same
time. Now, this Yaqut was always mixed up in crimes and wrong-doings, and he
had done one deed for which he still had to be disciplined.
But every time my father would think about punishing him, my uncle would
say, ‘Brother, by your life, grant me his guilt, and don’t forget that spear-thrust.’
Then my father would pardon him because of what his brother said.
That Hamadat, mentioned earlier, was delightful to talk with. My father (may
God have mercy upon him) told me, ‘I once said to Hamadat one morning while
we were on the road to Isfahan, “Commander Hamadat, have you eaten anything
today?”
‘“Yes, sir. I had a bit of crust soaked in broth,” he replied.
‘So I said, “But we’ve been riding all night, and we neither stopped nor did we
light a fire. So how did you come by that broth-soaked crust?”
‘“Well sir,” he replied, “I made it in my mouth. I chewed up some bread in my
mouth and drank water on top of it, which made it like a broth-soaked crust.”’
My father (may God have mercy upon him) was very experienced at warfare.
His body bore some dreadful wounds, but he died in his bed. One day he took
part in a battle in full armour, wearing an Islamic-style helmet with a nasal.
Someone – in those days most of their battles were with Arab tribesmen – hurled
a javelin at him and the spear-head struck the nasal of the helmet. It dented the
nasal and caused his nose to bleed, but it didn’t hurt him. But if God (glory be to
Him) had decreed that the javelin should deviate from the nasal of the helmet, it
would have killed him.
[52] On another occasion, he was struck in his lower leg by an arrow. He used
to keep a dagger in his boot,55 and the arrow struck the dagger without wounding
him. This was due to the superior protection of God (may He be exalted).
He (may God have mercy upon him) once saw battle on Sunday, 29 Shawwal
in the year 497 (25 July 1104) with Ibn Mula’ib,56 the lord of Apamea, in the
territory of Kafartab. He put on his cuirass but his servant in his haste forgot to
fasten the buckles on one side of it. Someone hurled a javelin57 at him and it hit
him right on the spot that the servant had left uncovered, above his left breast,
and the spear stuck out just above his right breast. His survival was a wonder of
the divine will, just as the wound itself was a wonder that God (glory be to Him)
had decreed.
On the same day, my father (may God have mercy upon him) struck a
horseman with his spear and, turning his horse away, curled his hand around the
spear and pulled it out of his opponent. He told me, I felt something burning my
forearm, but I thought it was just from the heat of the metal lamellae of my
cuirass. But then the spear fell from my hand and, pulling my hand back, I
discovered that a spear-thrust had hit me in the hand, which became weak since
the blow had cut some of my nerves.’
I was with him (may God have mercy upon him) when Zayd, the surgeon, was
treating his wound, with a servant standing behind his head.
My father said, ‘Zayd, take that pebble out of the wound.’
But the surgeon did not reply. So my father said again, ‘Zayd, don’t you see
that pebble? Won’t you remove it from my wound?’
Now that he had annoyed him, Zayd replied, ‘What pebble? That’s a nerve-
ending that has been severed.’ It really was as white as a pebble from the
Euphrates.
On that same day he was also struck by another spear-thrust, but God kept him
safe and sound until the day he died in his bed, may God [53] have mercy upon
him, Monday 8 Ramadan of the year 531 (30 May 1137).
My father wrote in an elegant hand and that spear-thrust did not affect his
calligraphic style. But he never copied anything except the Qur’an.
One day I asked him, ‘My lord, how many complete copies of the Qur’an have
you written?’
‘Soon you will know,’ he replied.
When he was close to death, he said, ‘In that chest there are some copy-books,
and in each one I have written a complete text of the Qur’an. Put them (meaning
the copy-books) under my cheek in the grave.’ We counted the copy-books and
there were forty-three of them.58
Among the complete Qur’ans that he copied there was one in a large format,
written with gold ink. In it he included in black, red and blue ink the Qur’anic
sciences – analysis of its variant readings, its obscure terms, its grammar and
style, its abrogating and abrogated passages, its commentary, the causes for the
revelation of its verses and its legal applications, calling it The Great
Commentary.59 He produced another complete copy in gold letters without the
commentary. The rest of the complete copies were done in black ink with the
opening words of the tenth and fifth parts60 of the book, the verse-markers,
chapter-headings and section-headings in gold.
My book does not require mention of this. I did so only to encourage my
readers to pray for God’s mercy upon my father. Now, to return to the previous
subject.
On that same day,61 a servant that used to belong to my uncle ‘Izz al-Dawla
Nasr (may God have mercy upon him), called Sham’un, was struck by a wicked
spear-thrust that he took protecting my other uncle Sultan (may God have mercy
upon him). It happened that my uncle Sultan later sent him as a messenger to the
king Ridwan,62 son of Tutush, in Aleppo.
When Sham’un had come before him, the king said to his own servants, ‘All
servants and subjects63 should be as loyal as this man was to his master.’
And he then said to Sham’un, ‘Tell them your story about what you did with
your master back in the days of my father.’64
Instead, Sham’un told him,65 ‘My lord, the other day I went into battle
alongside my master, and a horseman attacked him [54] with his spear. So I
jumped between him and my master to redeem my master with my own life, and
the horseman speared me instead. He cut two of my ribs, and these two ribs – by
your grace – I keep with me in a little box.’
At this, King Ridwan said to him, ‘By God, I will not respond until you send
someone to bring this box and the ribs.’ So Sham’un rose and sent for someone
to bring forth the box, and there were indeed two rib-bones inside it.
Ridwan was astonished by this and said to his companions, ‘This is how you
should be acting in my service.’
As for the story that the king had asked Sham’un about from the days of his
father Tutush, it happened like this: my grandfather, Sadid al-Mulk ‘Ali66 (may
God have mercy upon him), sent his son, my uncle ‘Izz al-Dawla Nasr (may God
have mercy upon him), into the service of Tutush, who was then encamped in
the outskirts of Aleppo. But Tutush arrested Nasr and confined him, entrusting
him to a special guard. No one could enter to see him except for his mamluk –
this same Sham’un – and even then the special guard stood around the tent.
So my uncle wrote to my father (may God have mercy upon them both), ‘Send
a group of my companions (whom he named) with a horse for me to ride to
such-and-such a place on the night of such-and-such (which he specified).’
And when that night came, Sham’un entered the tent and took off his clothes.
Then his master put them on and went out into the night, right in front of the
special guards: they did not even suspect him. He continued on to meet his
companions, mounted up and rode off. Meanwhile, Sham’un slept in his
master’s bed.
Now, Sham’un’s normal routine was to bring my uncle water early each
morning so that he could perform the ablutions, for my uncle was (may God
have mercy upon him) one of those ascetics who spent their nights reciting the
Book of God (may He be exalted). But when the guards woke the next morning
and did not see Sham’un go in to his master as usual, they went into the tent and
found Sham’un, my uncle having escaped. They reported this to Tutush, who
ordered Sham’un to be brought into his presence. When Sham’un was brought
before him, the king asked him, ‘So how did you do it?’
‘I gave my master my clothes,’ he replied. ‘He put them on and fled, while I
slept in his bed.’
‘But weren’t you afraid I would cut off your head?’ the king asked.
‘My lord,’ he responded, ‘if you had cut off my head and my lord escaped to
return to his home, then I would have been happy. For he only bought me and
raised me so that I might redeem him with my own life.’
So Tutush (may God have mercy upon him) said to his chamberlain, ‘Give to
this servant the horse of his master, as well as his [55] beasts of burden, tents and
all his baggage, then let him go to follow his master.’ And he did not blame
Sham’un or harbour any ill-will for what he did in the service of his master. That
is what the king Ridwan was referring to when he told him, ‘Tell my companions
what you did with your master back in the days of my father.’
I return now to the account of that war with Ibn Mula’ib mentioned earlier.
On that same day, my uncle ‘Izz al-Dawla67(may God have mercy upon him)
received a number of wounds. One of them was a spear-thrust in his lower
eyelid, near the inside corner of his eye. The spear-tip stuck into the inner corner
of his eye, just on the rim, so the entire eyelid fell and hung there from a flap of
skin at the rim of his eye. The eye itself kept moving around without resting, for
it is the eyelids that hold the eye in place. But the surgeon sewed up the eye and
treated it, and it returned to its original position so that you wouldn’t even be
able to tell the wounded eye apart from the other one.
I saw something of the bravery of men and their courage in time of war on
another occasion. We woke up one morning at the time of the dawn prayer and
noticed a detachment of Franks, about ten horsemen, who had come to the gate
of the town before it had been opened.72
They asked the gatekeeper, ‘What’s the name of this here town?’73 The gate
was made of wood, with beam-bolts running across the doors, and the
gatekeeper was on the inside of the gate.
‘Shayzar,’ he said. At that, they shot an arrow through a gap in the door, turned
their horses around and trotted off.
So we mounted up. My [57] uncle (may God have mercy upon him) was the
first to mount his horse and I went with him while the Franks rode ahead
completely unworried. A few of our troops joined up with us.
‘At your command,’ I said to my uncle, ‘I’ll take our comrades and go follow
them and unhorse them, seeing as they are not so far away.’
‘No,’ he replied (for he was more experienced than I in matters of war). ‘Is
there a Frank left in Syria who does not know Shayzar? This is a trick.’
He then called two of our horsemen riding swift mounts and said, ‘Go and
reconnoitre Tall Milh.’ For that was where the Franks used to lie in ambush.
As soon as they were in position overlooking Tall Milh, the entire army of
Antioch rushed out against them. So we went to confront their vanguard, hoping
to seize our advantage over them before the battle finished. With us was Jum’a
al-Numayri and his son Mahmud. Jum’a was our cavalier, our teacher.
His son Mahmud somehow fell into the midst of the enemy, so Jum’a shouted,
‘Fellow horsemen! My son!’
And we turned back with him with sixteen horsemen, thrusting our spears at
sixteen Frankish knights and took our comrade from their midst. But we became
so mixed up with them in the melee that one of them put Jum’a in a choke-hold.
A few more of our spear-thrusts were able to save him, though.74
§ A Lesson in Humility
Nevertheless, one should not trust one’s bravery too much nor make too much
of one’s courage. By God, I once went out with my uncle (may God have mercy
upon him) to make a raid on Apamea. It happened that the Franks had gone to
escort a caravan. Having done so, they returned and we met them in battle and
killed nearly twenty of their men. I saw Jum’a al-Numayri (may God have mercy
upon him) with half of a quntariya-spear sticking in him. The spear had been
thrust through his saddle-pad, went through the saddle-lining into his thigh until
it stuck out behind him. Thus, the spear broke still inside him.
This horrified me, but he said, ‘Not to worry, I’m fine,’ and taking hold of the
tip of the spear, he pulled it out of him and he and his horse were safe and sound.
I then said to him, ‘Abu Mahmud, I’d really prefer to get closer to the citadel
so that we can see it clearly.’
‘Let’s go,’ he said.
And so he and I trotted off on our horses. When we got to a spot looking onto
the citadel, what should we find but eight Frankish knights positioned on the
road, which overlooks the plaza there [58] from a height; and there was no
coming down from that height except by that road.75
So Jum’a said to me, ‘Stay here and I’ll show you what I can do with them.’
‘But that’s not fair,’ I protested. ‘It’s better if you and I attack them together.’
‘Let’s go,’ he replied.
And so we attacked them, routed them and withdrew, the two of us thinking
we had done something no one else had done – two warriors routing eight
Frankish knights.
We stopped on that elevation to have a look at the citadel, but we were
surprised to see that a tiny footman had climbed all the way up that difficult
ascent after us, wielding a bow and arrows. He started shooting at us, but we had
no way to get to him, so we fled. By God, we really didn’t think we would get
away from him with our horses safe and sound! We withdrew and came into the
meadows of Apamea, from which we drove before us great herds of buffalo,
cows and sheep. And so we left, my heart full of regret at that man who made us
flee without there being any way for us to get to him, and at how one man was
able to rout us, when we had just routed eight Frankish knights.
On that same day, we encountered the horsemen of Hama in battle while some
of them went ahead with the herd onto the island. We fought one another, and
among the enemy were the leading cavaliers of the army of Hama: Sarhank,
Ghazi al-Talli, Mahmud ibn Baldaji, Hadr al-Tut and the isbasalar [63] Khut-
lukh.87 They outnumbered us but we attacked them and routed them. I made
directly for one of their horsemen intending to run my spear through him, but
who should it turn out to be but Hadr al-Tut, who shouted, ‘Mercy!’ I then turned
away from him towards another horseman and speared him, the spear hitting him
just below his armpit. If he had just let it be, he would not have fallen, but he
pressed his arm on it, trying to take away the spear, while my horse sped up with
me. So he flew out of his saddle onto the neck of the horse and fell to the
ground. He then stood up, finding himself on the side of the canyon leading
down to al-Jalali.88 So he struck his horse and, leading it before him, went
down.89 I thanked God (glory be to Him), who let no harm befall him from my
spear-thrust: for that horseman was Ghazi al-Talli, and he was (may God have
mercy on him) an excellent man.
Prior to this, Tancred,96 who was the first lord of Antioch after Bohemond,
had encamped against us. So we fought one another and then arranged a truce.
Tancred sent a messenger requesting a horse that belonged to a servant of my
uncle, [66] Sultan (may God have mercy upon him). It was a noble steed. So my
uncle sent the horse to Tancred, mounted by one of our companions, a Kurd
called Hasanun. He was one of our most courageous horsemen, even though he
was but a youngster. A good-looking man, thin. He was supposed to race the
horse against some others for Tancred, so he raced it and it beat all the other
horses that were in play. He was brought before Tancred, and the knights began
to inspect his gear and were amazed at his thin physique and his youthfulness,
since they had heard he was a courageous horseman.
Tancred bestowed robes of honour on him, but Hasanun said, ‘My lord, I ask
that you grant me your guarantee of safe-conduct, so that if you overcome me in
battle, you would have mercy upon me and release me.’
And so Tancred granted him his guarantee of safe-conduct, or so Hasanun
assumed, for they only speak Frankish and we do not understand what they say.
After that, a year or more passed and the truce expired. Tancred came at us
with the army of Antioch, and we fought one another before the walls of the city.
Our cavalry had met their vanguard and one of our men, a Kurd called Kamil the
Scarred, thrust his spear at them with gusto. He and Hasanun were peers in
bravery. Hasanun had halted on his mare with my father (may God have mercy
upon him), awaiting his charger which a servant of his was bringing out from the
veterinary, along with his kazaghand-armour. But the servant was slow to return
and Hasanun, seeing the spear-work that Kamil the Scarred was doing, was
getting anxious.
So he said to my father, ‘My lord, let me use some light equipment instead.’
‘These are the mules with the equipment, standing right here,’ my father
indicated. ‘Wear whatever suits you.’
At the time, I was standing behind my father, a mere youth, for this was the
first day I had ever participated in battle. Hasanun had a look at the kazaghand-
armour in their cases on the backs of the mules, but he couldn’t make up his
mind on any. He was boiling in his desire to ride out and do what Kamil the
Scarred was doing. So he sped away on his mare, completely unarmoured. A
Frankish horseman intercepted him and thrust his spear at the mare’s croup. As a
result, the mare took the bit in its teeth and bolted ahead with Hasanun until it
threw him to the ground in the midst of a band of Franks.
They took him prisoner and tortured him in a variety of ways. They had
wanted to gouge out his left eye, but Tancred (may God curse him) said to them,
‘Take out his right eye; that way, when he carries his shield, his left eye will be
covered and he will no longer be able to see anything.’
So they gouged out [67] his right eye, just as Tancred ordered. For his ransom,
they demanded one thousand dinars and a black charger that belonged to my
father, a noble horse of the Khafaja,97 one of the finest. And so my father (may
God have mercy upon him) ransomed him back with that horse.
On that day, many infantrymen marched out from Shayzar, too. The Franks
attacked them but were unable to make them budge from their position. So
Tancred flew into a rage and said, ‘You are my knights! Each one of you earns a
stipend worth a hundred stipends of these Muslims. These are but
serjents98(which means infantrymen), and you cannot even dislodge them from
their place!’
They replied, ‘But we were only afraid for our horses; otherwise we would
have run them down and put our spears through them.’
At this, Tancred said, ‘The horses are mine. Whoever loses his charger in
battle, let me replace it.’ They then made a number of charges against our men,
in which seventy of their horses were killed, but they still were unable to shake
our men from their positions.
At Apamea, there was one of the greatest Frankish knights, called Badrahu.99
He was always asking, ‘I wonder, will I never get to meet Jum’a in battle?’ And
Jum’a was always asking, ‘I wonder, will I never get to meet Badrahu in battle?’
The army of Antioch now camped against us and pitched their tents at the spot
where they used to do so, with the water100between us. We had a detachment
posted at an elevated spot across from them. One of their knights rode out from
their tents and stopped below our detachment, with the river between them, and
shouted at them, ‘Is Jum’a with you?’
‘No,’ they replied.
And, by God, he was not present among them. That knight was Badrahu.
Looking around, he spotted four of our horsemen on his side of the river: Yahya
ibn Safi Left-Hand,101 Sahl ibn Abi Ghanim the Kurd and Haritha al-Numayri,
along with another horseman. [68] Badrahu attacked them, put them to flight and
caught up with one of them, at whom he thrust his spear. But it was a useless
blow as his horse had not caught up enough to allow him a decent thrust. So he
returned to camp.
That group of our horsemen went back into town, where their shame was made
public. The people hurled abuse at them and cast aspersions on them and
disparaged them, saying, ‘Four horsemen routed by one knight! You should have
split up in front of him, so that, with him attacking one of you with his spear, the
other three could have killed him and you would not have been put to such
shame.’ Their severest critic was Jum’a al-Numayri.
But it was as if that defeat had granted to these men hearts other than their own
and a sense of bravery to which they had never before aspired. For after that
defeat, they grew in self-worth – fighting and distinguishing themselves in
warfare, becoming some of our most noteworthy horsemen.
As for Badrahu, after that encounter he went off on some errand from Apamea,
headed for Antioch. But on his way there, a lion came out at him from a thicket
in al-Ruj,102 tore him from his mule and brought him back to the thicket and ate
him (may God not have mercy upon him).
[70] A similar example was related to me by al-’Uqab the Poet, one of our
Bedouin troops.106 He said, ‘My father left Palmyra107headed for the market of
Damascus, accompanied by four horsemen and four men on foot, leading eight
camels for sale. My father said:
We were on our way when what should we see coming from the very
heart of the desert but a horseman, who kept on coming until he was quite
close to us. He said, ‘Leave the camels!’ We shouted at him and cursed him,
so he charged his horse at us and speared one of our horsemen, unhorsing
and wounding him. We chased after him but he kept on ahead. Then he
turned back and said, ‘Leave the camels!’ We shouted and cursed him again,
so he charged at us and speared one of our infantrymen, badly wounding
him. We followed and he kept ahead, but then he turned back and charged,
with us having lost two of our men. So one of our men confronted him. Our
comrade thrust his spear at him, but the blow fell on his foe’s saddlebow and
broke our comrade’s spear. The horseman now thrust his spear at our man
and wounded him, then charged at us again and speared one of our men,
felling him. He then said, ‘Leave the camels! If not, I will wipe you out!’
And so we said, ‘Come here and take half of them instead.’ ‘No,’ he replied,
‘set aside four of them and leave them standing there; then take your four
and be off with you!’ And so we did, not trusting that we would escape with
what he had let us keep. He led away those four camels as we watched,
without being able to do anything about it. And so he went away with his
plunder, and he was but a lone man while we were eight.
Another similar case occurred when Tancred, the lord of Antioch, made a raid
on Shayzar, rustling a large quantity of our cattle and killing and taking prisoner
some of our people. He encamped at a village called Zalin, in which there is an
inaccessible cave hanging there in the middle of the mountain with no way to get
to it climbing down from above or climbing up from below. Those seeking
refuge there can only get down to it using ropes.
On that day, Thursday, 20 Rabi’ al-Akhir, the year [71] 502 (27 November
1108), some devil of a Frankish horseman went to Tancred and said, ‘Make me a
box out of wood which I can sit in. Then lower me from the mountaintop down
to them by chains fastened to the box. That way, they won’t be able to cut them
with their swords and send me falling.’
So they made him a box and lowered him on the suspended chains down to the
cave and he captured it, bringing down everyone in it to Tancred. That was
because the cave was one large room, containing no place where the people
could secrete themselves. So that Frank just shot arrows at them; not an arrow
fell that did not strike someone, thanks to the narrowness of the place and the
large number of people in it.
Among those who were taken captive that day was a woman of noble Arab
stock. Prior to this, she had been described to my uncle Sultan (may God have
mercy upon him) while she was still living at the home of her father. So my
uncle sent an old woman, one of our followers, to have a look at her. Whether
because they had switched women on her or whether she had seen some other
woman, our old woman came back describing her, her beauty and her
intelligence. So my uncle engaged her and married her. But when she was then
introduced to him, he saw something that had not been described to him,108 not to
mention the fact that she was a mute. So he paid her dowry and sent her back to
her people. It was this woman who was taken prisoner by the Franks on that day,
taken from the home of her people. But my uncle said, ‘I will not let a woman
whom I have married and who has uncovered herself before me become a
prisoner of the Franks!’ and he ransomed her back (may God have mercy upon
him) for five hundred dinars and delivered her to her family.
So my father let him be and went off to the gang to tell them about the
Turk and what he was carrying with him. They then all went out to intercept
him on the road. When the Turk saw them, he took out his bow, nocked an
arrow and bent his bow intending to shoot at them. But the bowstring
snapped, the gang rushed at him and he fled. They seized the mule, the girl
and the saddle-bag. But the girl said to them, ‘Now, boys, don’t dishonour
me, by God! Instead, ransom me and the mule too for a jewelled necklace
that the Turk has with him, worth five hundred dinars, and you can take the
saddle-bag and its contents too.’ ‘Let’s do it,’ they said. ‘Send me’, she said,
‘with one of you accompanying me to speak with the Turk and get the
necklace from him.’ So they sent her with someone to guard her until she
came near the Turk and said to him, ‘I have ransomed myself and the mule
for the necklace that is in the leg of your left boot, your shoe. Give it to me.’
‘Will do,’ he replied and went to one side away from them and took off his
boot and – guess what? – there was a bowstring in it which he strung on his
bow! He then returned to them. The gang kept on fighting him while he
picked them off one by one until he had killed forty-three men. And while
looking around, who should he see but my father in the group of toughs still
remaining. ‘You! Among them!’ he cried. ‘So you want me to give you your
share of my arrows!’ ‘No!’ my father cried. ‘Then take these seventeen men
who are left’, he said, ‘and bring them to the governor of the region so he can
hang them.’ In the meantime, those men had thrown down their arms and
were standing bug-eyed in fear. The Turk led his mule before him with
everything that [73] was on it and marched away. Thus, through him, did
God (may He be exalted) send a calamity and His great wrath upon that gang
of toughs.
A similar case that I witnessed took place in the year 509 (1115). My father
(may God have mercy upon him) had gone out at the head of the army to join the
isbasalar Bursuq ibn Bursuq (may God have mercy upon him), who had arrived
to lead an expedition by order of the sultan.114 He came at the head of an
immense force, with a group of prominent amirs,115including: Commander of the
Armies Uzbeh, lord of Mosul; Sunqur Diraz, lord of al-Rahba; the amir
Kundughadi; the grand chamberlain Baktimur; Zangi ibn Bursuq, a real warrior-
hero; Tamirak; Isma’il al-Bakji, and other amirs. They encamped against
Kafartab, where the two brothers of Theo-philos116 and the Franks were, and
attacked it. The troops from Khurasan entered the fosse and began digging a
tunnel.117 The Franks were convinced of their own destruction, so they set fire to
the citadel and burned the roof, which fell upon the horses, beasts of burden,
sheep, pigs and captives, burning them all up. But some of the Franks remained
on the top of the citadel, clinging to its walls.
It then occurred to me to enter the sapping-tunnel and have a look at it. So I
descended into the fosse, with arrows and stones falling on us like rain, and
entered the tunnel. I saw there a very clever thing: they had tunnelled from the
fosse to the barbican, and on either side of the tunnel they had set up posts, over
which stretched a plank to prevent the earth above it from falling in. They
extended the tunnel along in this way using timbers right up to the base of the
barbican. Then they tunnelled under the walls of the barbican, keeping it
supported, and reached as far as the foundations of the tower.118 The tunnel here
was narrow, as it was only intended as a way to get to the tower. As soon as they
reached the tower, [74] they widened the tunnel along the wall of the tower,
supported it on timbers, and, a little bit at a time, they started carrying out the
pieces of chipped away stone. The floor of the tunnel, on account of the stone
chipping, became like mud. Having inspected the tunnel, I left without the
Khurasani troops recognizing me. If they had, they would not have let me leave
without paying them a heavy fine.
They then set about cutting up dry wood and stuffing the tunnel with it. Early
the next morning, they set it ablaze. We had put on our armour and marched to
the fosse, under a great shower of stones and arrows, to launch an assault on the
citadel once the tower collapsed. As soon as the fire began to do its work, the
layers of mortar between the stones of the wall began to fall out, then the wall
cracked, the crack widened and the tower fell. We had thought that, once the
tower fell, we would be able to advance on the enemy. But only the outer face of
the tower fell; the inner wall remained as it was.119 So we stood there until the
sun became too hot for us, and then went back to our tents having suffered a lot
of damage from all the stones.
We rested until noon, when what should happen but an infantryman from our
army went out all alone, armed with his sword and shield. He marched up to the
wall of the tower that had fallen, whose sides had become like the steps of a
stairway, and climbed up until he reached its highest point.120 When the other
infantrymen of our army saw him, about ten of them rushed to follow him, fully
armed, climbing up one behind the other until they were all on top of the tower,
while the Franks were completely unaware of them. As for us, we suited up in
our tents and marched out. Many more of the infantrymen had climbed the tower
before the rest of the army had arrived.
The Franks now turned upon our men and shot them with arrows, wounding
the one who was the first to climb up. So he went back down. But the other men
continued to climb until they were facing the Franks on the parapet between the
two tower walls.121 In front of them rose a tower with a doorway, in which stood
an armoured horseman with shield and spear preventing entrance to the tower.
On top of the tower was a group of Franks attacking our men [75] with arrows
and stones. One of the Turks climbed up while we were watching and,
abandoning himself to fortune, walked forwards until he approached the tower
and hurled a bottle of naphtha122 on those who were on top of it. I saw it blaze
like a shooting star on the stones, while those Franks threw themselves to the
ground out of fear of getting burned. The Turk then came back.
Another Turk climbed up and walked along the parapet with a sword and
shield. From the tower that had the horseman in its doorway, there came against
him one of their men wearing a doubled hauberk,123 spear in hand, but no shield.
The Turk met him, sword in hand, and the Frank thrust his spear at him. But the
Turk pushed the spearhead away from him with his shield and stepped forward
to his enemy, putting himself in where the Frank’s spear had been.124 So the
Frank spun away from him, turning and bending his back like a man at
prayer,125out of fear for his head. The Turk struck him with a number of blows,
none of which had any effect. He then walked on until he entered the tower,
where our men outnumbered and overpowered him and his comrades. The
Franks then delivered the citadel and the captives came down to the tents of
Bursuq.
The captives gathered together in the large tent of Bursuq to set for themselves
the ransom by which they would be freed. I saw among them that one who had
come out with his spear against the Turk. He stood up – he was a serjent – and
said, ‘How much do you want from me?’
‘We want six hundred dinars,’ they said.
But he just scoffed at them and said, ‘Pfft! I’m just a serjent; my stipend is two
dinars a month! Where am I going to get six hundred dinars?’ and then returned
and sat down among his comrades. He was of very large build.
The amir al-Sayyid al-Sharif,126 who was one of the greatest amirs, said to my
father (may God have mercy upon them both), ‘Brother, can you believe these
people? I seek refuge in God from them!’
And God (glory be to Him) decreed that our army should move from Kafartab
to Danith;127 we were surprised early Tuesday morning, 23 Rabi’ al-Akhir (15
September 1115) by the army of Antioch. [76] The surrender of Kafartab had
occurred on Friday, 13 Rabi’ al-Akhir (5 September). The amir al-Sayyid (may
God have mercy upon him) and a large host of Muslims were killed.
My father (may God have mercy upon him) returned after he had parted from
me at Kafartab, his army having been crushed. We were still at Kafartab keeping
watch on it, intending to rebuild it, since the isbasalar Bursuq had granted it to
us. We were removing the prisoners in pairs, each pair chained to a soldier from
Shayzar. One of them was half-burned, though his thigh was unharmed; another
died in the fire: I saw in them a weighty example worthy of contemplation. We
then left Kafartab and returned to Shayzar with my father (may God have mercy
upon him), he having had all his tents, camels, mules, baggage and furniture
taken from him, and the entire army having dispersed.
What had happened to the army at Danith was the result of a ruse foisted on
them by Lu’lu’ the Eunuch,128 who was lord of Aleppo at the time. He made a
plan with the lord of Antioch129 to deceive them and divide them, at which point
the latter would set out from Antioch at the head of his army to destroy them. So
Lu’lu’ sent a messenger to the isbasalar Bursuq (may God have mercy upon him)
saying, ‘Send one of the amirs to me with a detachment of troops and I will
deliver Aleppo to him. I am truly afraid that the populace of the city will not
agree to let me deliver the city to someone else, so I want a body of troops to
accompany the amir and thereby overawe the Aleppines.’
So Bursuq sent him the Commander of the Armies130 Uzbeh with three
thousand horsemen. But Roger (may God curse him) surprised them one
morning and, through the execution of the divine will, destroyed them. The
Franks (may God curse them) returned to Kafartab, rebuilt it and settled in it.
[77] God (may He be exalted) decreed that the Frankish captives whom we had
taken at Kafartab be released, since the amirs divided them among themselves
and kept them until they could ransom themselves off. The exception to this was
the case of the Commander of the Armies. For, before leaving for Aleppo, he
ordered all those who fell to his share to be executed. And so the armies
dispersed – those who survived Danith, that is – and they headed back to their
homelands.
At any rate, it was that man who climbed all alone onto the tower of Kafartab
who was the cause of its capture.
[78] The following example was told to me by Chief Sahri,132 who was in
service to the amir Shams al-Khawwas Altuntash, lord of Rafaniya; between the
latter and ‘Alam al-Din ‘Ali-Kurd, the lord of Hama, there was a standing
enmity and dispute:
Shams al-Khawwas ordered me to appraise the hinterland of Rafaniya and
inspect its crops. I went accompanied by a band of troops and I appraised the
land. One evening, I encamped at one of the villages of Rafaniya which had
a tower, so we climbed up to the roof of the tower and had our dinner and
relaxed while our horses were down at the tower door. Before we knew it, a
man emerged from the tower battlements and screamed at us, then hurled
himself at us with a knife in his hand. We fled from him, descending the first
flight of steps with him in pursuit, then the second flight, with him still in
pursuit, until we reached the door. We rushed out and what do you know, but
he had stationed some men at the door! They grabbed every one of us and
tied us up with cords and brought us in to Hama to ‘Ali-Kurd. We only
escaped execution because of a special dispensation of Fate. Instead, he
imprisoned us and set a heavy ransom on us. And the one who caused all of
this was that one man from the tower.
Thus, when men embolden their spirits to do something, they do it. Moreover,
men compare differently with respect to their sense of resolve and their dignity.
As my father (may God have mercy upon him) once said to me:
Every good member of a given species can always find its equivalent
value in bad members of the same species. For example, a good horse is
worth one hundred dinars, but five bad horses are also worth one hundred
dinars. The same goes for camels, and the same for different kinds of
clothing. The only exception is the son of Adam, for, truly, one thousand bad
men will never be worth the same as one good man.
And he was right, may God have mercy upon him.
I once sent a mamluk of mine on an important errand to Damascus, but it
happened that the atabeg Zangi (may God have mercy upon him) had captured
Hama and was encamped against Homs, thereby blocking the route home for my
man. So he made instead for Baalbek and from there to Tripoli, where he hired a
mule from a Christian man called Yunan.134The latter transported my mamluk to
the place where he hired out animals, saw him off on his journey and then
returned. My man travelled out as part of a caravan, intending to get to Shayzar
via the mountain forts.
But a man intercepted them and told the owners of the caravan-animals, ‘Don’t
go on. On your route at such-and-such a place there is a band of robbers – sixty,
seventy men – who will take you all captive.’ And so, my man told me:
We stopped, not knowing what to do. We neither relished the idea of turning
back nor dared, out of fear, to proceed. And that’s the state we were in when who
should appear but Chief Yunan, approaching in a hurry. ‘What brings you here,
Chief?’ we asked. ‘I heard,’ he replied, ‘that there are robbers on your route, so I
came to travel with you. Let’s go.’ We went with him to that location where –
sure enough – a large band of [80] robbers came down the mountain intending to
capture us. But Yunan intercepted them saying, ‘Boys, keep your ground! I am
Yunan, and these people are under my protection. By God, there’s not a man
among you could even get close to them.’ In this way, he turned them back – all
of them, by God – without them so much as eating a loaf of our bread. Yunan
continued on with us until we were safe, then saw us off and withdrew.
This same man of mine, who went up to Egypt with me in the year 538
(1144), told me a story about the son of the lord of Mount Sinai135 (Mount Sinai
is a distant province belonging to Egypt; when al-Hafiz – may God have mercy
upon him – wanted to banish one of the amirs, he would make him governor of
Mount Sinai. It’s close to Frankish territory).
‘The son of the governor of Mount Sinai,’ my man said, ‘told me the following
story:136
My father was made governor of Mount Sinai, and I went with him to the
province, being rather fond of hunting. So I went out one day to go hunting
and a band of Franks fell on me, took me captive and carried me back to
Bayt Jibril, where they shut me up in a pit all by myself. The lord of Bayt
Jibril set a ransom of two thousand dinars for me. I remained in that pit for a
year, without anyone ever asking about me. But one day as I was in the pit,
what should happen but the cover was lifted and a Bedouin man was lowered
down towards me. ‘Where’d they get you?’ I asked. ‘Right from the road,’ he
replied. He stayed with me for a few days and they set for him a ransom of
fifty dinars. One day he said to me, ‘You want to know something? I’m the
only one who can rescue you from this pit. Rescue me, and I’ll rescue you.’ I
said to myself, ‘This is a man who, having fallen into misfortune, desperately
wants to escape,’ and I did not answer him. Then, after a few days more, he
repeated what he said to me. I said to myself, ‘By God, I damn well will try
to rescue him, and perhaps God will rescue me in recompense.’ So I shouted
for the jailer and said, ‘Tell the lord that I wish to speak with him.’ He then
came back and pulled me out of the pit and brought me before the lord. I said
to him, ‘I have been in your prison for a year now and no one has asked for
me and no one even knows whether [81] I am living or dead. But you have
imprisoned this Bedouin with me and set for him a ransom of fifty dinars.
Add that amount to my own ransom and let me send him to my father to get
him to free me.’ ‘You may do so,’ he said. So I returned and informed the
Bedouin who, saying goodbye, went away.
I waited for two months for him to do something, but I saw no trace of him
and heard no news, so I despaired of him. But one night, to my astonishment,
he emerged before me from a tunnel dug through the side of the pit. ‘Get up!’
he said. ‘By God, it’s been five months that I’ve been digging this burrow
from a ruined village to get to you.’ So I stood up with him and we went out
through that burrow. He then broke my chain and brought me to my home. I
don’t know what should surprise me more – his integrity, or his sense of
direction being so good that his burrow ended right at the side of the pit!
When God (glory be to Him) decrees that relief should come, then what an
easy thing it is to bring it about!
I used to travel frequently to visit the king of the Franks during the truce that
existed between him and Jamal al-Din Muhammad (may God have mercy upon
him) on account of an act of generosity that my father (may God have mercy
upon him) had done for King Baldwin, the father of the queen, the wife of King
Fulk, son of Fulk.137 The Franks used to bring their captives before me so that I
might buy their freedom, and so I bought those whose deliverance God
facilitated.
Once a real devil of a Frank called William Jiba138 went out in a boat of his on
a raid and he captured a ship carrying Muslim pilgrims from the Maghrib,
around four hundred souls, men and women. Groups of these captives would be
brought to me by their owners and I would buy those of them I could afford to
buy. There was a young man among them who would offer a greeting but then
sit and refuse to speak. I asked about him and I was told [82] that he was an
ascetic and his master was a tanner.
So I asked his master, ‘For how much will you sell this one to me?’
‘By the truth of my religion,’ he replied, ‘I won’t sell him except as a pair with
this old man, and for the same price I paid when I bought them, forty-three
dinars.’
So I bought both of them. I also bought a few more for me and another few for
the amir Mu’in al-Din (may God have mercy upon him), all for 120 dinars. I
paid out all the money I had with me and offered a guarantee for the remainder.
I then went to Damascus and told the amir Mu’in al-Din (may God have mercy
upon him), ‘I bought back some captives for you, putting them specifically under
your charge, but I didn’t have the full amount with which to pay for them. And
now I’ve arrived back at my home. If you want them, you can pay the remainder
of their price; if not, I will.’
‘No, I’ll pay for them,’ he said. ‘By God, there’s no one who desires the
spiritual rewards of such a good deed more than I.’
He was (may God have mercy upon him) the most eager person when it came
to performing good works and meriting the spiritual rewards that came from
them, so he paid for them. After a few days, I returned to Acre.139
There remained thirty-eight captives still with William Jiba, including the wife
of a man that God (may He be exalted) had already delivered by my hand. So I
bought her without paying her price just then. I then rode to Jiba’s home (may
God curse him) and asked him, ‘Will you sell me ten of them?’
‘By the truth of my religion,’ he replied, ‘I’ll only sell all of them together.’
‘I don’t have enough on me to buy all of them together,’ I said. ‘I’ll buy some
of them now. At the next opportunity, I’ll buy the rest.’
He merely replied, ‘I’ll only sell all of them together!’
So I left. But God (glory be to Him) decreed that the captives should run away
that very night, all of them. Now, the inhabitants of the villages of Acre are all
Muslims, so whenever a captive came to them, they would hide him and bring
him to the lands of Islam. That damned Frank searched after his captives but
never got hold of any of them, for God (glory be to Him) saw their deliverance
to be good.
The next morning, the Frank demanded from me the price of that woman
whom I had bought but whose price I had not yet paid, and who had been among
those who had run away.
I said, ‘Bring her to me, and you can take her price.’
He replied, ‘Her price has rightfully been mine since yesterday before she ran
away.’
And he obliged me to pay her price. So I paid it to him, considering it an easy
thing given the joy I took at the deliverance of those poor people.
[85] A digression:146 We were chatting about warfare one day in the hearing of
my tutor, the learned sheikh known as Ibn al-Munira147 (may God have mercy
upon him).
So I said to him, ‘Say, master! If you would mount a charger, put on a
kazaghand and helmet, belt on a sword, carry a spear and shield and position
yourself at the Judge’s Mosque148 (a narrow place where the Franks – God curse
them – used to pass by), not a single one of them would be able to get by you!’
‘Oh no,’ he replied. ‘By God, they’d all get by.’
I said, ‘But they’d be terrified of you, and they wouldn’t know who you were!’
‘Glory be to God!’ he replied. ‘Don’t I know myself?’ Then he said to yours
truly, ‘A man of reason does not fight.’ So I said, ‘But master! Are you judging
so-and-so and so-and-so (and I listed some of our comrades who were
courageous horsemen) to be witless?’
‘That is not what I meant,’ he replied. ‘I merely meant that all reason is absent
at the time of battle. If it were present, then men would not confront swords with
their faces, nor spears and arrows with their chests. This is not the sort of thing
that reason calls for.’
He was (may God have mercy upon him), however, more experienced with
scholarship than he was with combat. For it is precisely reason that fills one with
resolve in the face of swords, spears and arrows out of disdain towards being
cast as a coward and smeared with bad reputation. The proof of that is that a man
of courage, before going in to battle, will be stricken with shakes, he shivers and
changes in colour due to all the dangers he thinks upon and talks to himself
about, dangers stemming from what he plans to do and the risks he is about to
encounter. A man’s soul will always shudder at such dangers and loathe them.
But once that man of courage enters the fray of battle and wades among its
throngs, all that shaking, shuddering and changing of colour disappears.
Indeed, every act in which reason is absent results in error and failure. Here is
an example. Once, the Franks encamped against Hama in its fields, [86] in which
there was a fat harvest of corn; they pitched their tents right in the midst of that
harvest. Now, a group of robbers came out from Shayzar to reconnoitre the
Frankish army and rob them, and they noticed their tents were pitched in the
corn.
So the next morning, one of them went before the lord of Hama and said,
‘Tonight I will burn up the entire Frankish army.’
‘If you do that,’ replied the lord, ‘I will cover you with honours.’
Once evening fell, the robber went out with a group of like-minded
companions, and they started the fire in the corn west of the tents, so that the
breeze would drive the flames towards the tents of the enemy. Thanks to the light
of the fire, the night became like day, so the Franks caught sight of them, rushed
towards them and killed most of them. Only those who threw themselves in to
the river and swam over to the other side managed to escape. And so here we see
the impact of ignorance and its consequences.
I happened to witness a similar case, though it did not take place during
combat. The Franks had amassed their troops in great numbers against Banias,
and they were accompanied by their patriarch.149 The patriarch had pitched a
large tent to use as a church in which they could pray. An old deacon was
responsible for maintaining the church and he had covered the floor using rushes
and grass, which infested the place with fleas. It then occurred to that deacon to
burn the rushes and grass so as to burn up the fleas. So he set the rushes and
grass – which had all dried out – on fire. The flames rose higher and higher and
caught on the tent, leaving it a pile of ashes. Reason was surely not present in
this man.
A contrasting example.150 One day we rode out from Shayzar on the hunt. My
uncle (may God have mercy upon him) and a body of troops accompanied us. As
we went into a cane-brake in pursuit of a francolin, a lion emerged to attack us.
A man from the group of Kurdish troops called Zahr al-Dawla Bakhti-yar the
Cypriot, so named because of his elegant frame,151charged at the lion. He was
(may God have mercy upon him) one of the real cavaliers of the Muslims. The
lion confronted him, but the man’s horse shied away from it and threw its rider.
The lion came at him while he was lying flat on the ground. So, Zahr al-Dawla
raised his lower leg and the lion began chewing it. We rushed the lion and killed
it, [87] delivering our comrade safe and sound.
We asked him, ‘Zahr al-Dawla, why did you lift your leg right up to the mouth
of the lion?’
He replied, ‘As you can see, my body is lean and lanky, and I’m only wearing
a cloth garment and a tunic. There is nothing on me better covered than my
lower leg, with its gaiter, boots and leggings. So I said to myself, “I’ll use my leg
to distract him from my ribs or my hand or my head until God (may He be
exalted) brings me relief.”’
And so, reason was surely present in this man, in a situation where minds are
often lost. But with those other examples, reason was not present. Humanity,
therefore, requires reason above all things. It is praised by the rational and the
ignorant alike.
When I presented myself before the amir, he asked me, ‘Tell me, son, I sent
you clothes which you would not wear, bath accessories which you would
not accept, and you returned them. What’s behind all this?’ I said, ‘My lord, I
have come with a message from the sultan on an errand that has not yet been
completed. Am I to accept all those things that you were kind enough to give
and return home without having accomplished the sultan’s errand, as if I only
came here for my own needs?’ ‘Son,’ he replied, ‘didn’t you notice the
prosperity of my lands, their many beauties and gardens, their numerous
peasant-farmers and prosperous villages? Do you really think I would risk
the ruin of all that for the sake of thirty thousand dinars? By God, I had that
gold packaged up for you the day you arrived. I was only waiting for the
sultan to pass out of my lands, after which you would rejoin him with the
money; for I was afraid that if I gave him then what he demanded, he would
demand even more from me when he approached my lands. So don’t you
trouble your heart about it: your business is done.’ Then he had the three
changes of clothes sent to me – the ones he had already sent to me but which
I had returned – with all of the bath accessories that he had sent to me over
those three bath visits, and I accepted it all. Once the sultan had moved on
from Diyar Bakr, he gave me the money and I carried it off and, bearing it
with me, I rejoined the sultan.
In good governance will be found great gains, stemming from the prosperity
of the land. Here is an example:
The atabeg Zangi (may God have mercy upon him) became engaged to the
daughter of the lord of Khilat.155 Her father [89] having died, it was her mother
who governed the region. But Husam al-Dawla ibn Dilmaj, lord of Bitlis,156 now
sent a messenger requesting that the girl be engaged to his son. So the atabeg
marched at the head of a good-sized army to Khilat, using a road other than the
one that goes through the Bitlis pass. By this route, we passed through the
mountains. We camped without tents, all of us stopping on the road, in
formation, until we arrived at Khilat. The atabeg set up camp outside the city and
we entered its citadel and drew up the terms of the marriage-contract and dowry.
Once business was concluded, the atabeg ordered al-Yaghisiyani to take the
larger part of the army and march to Bitlis and attack it. So we rode out in the
early part of the evening and greeted the next morning at Bitlis itself. Its ruler,
Husam al-Dawla, came out and met us on an open space just outside the city and
had al-Yaghisiyani set up camp in the training-grounds.157 He offered al-
Yaghisiyani generous hospitality, waiting upon him and drinking with him there
in the training-grounds.
He asked his guest, ‘My lord, what are you planning? You have put yourself
through trials and tired yourself out just to get here.’
Al-Yaghisiyani replied, ‘The atabeg was angered by your seeking the hand of
the girl to whom he was already engaged. You offered to give ten thousand
dinars as dowry and we demand it from you now.’
‘Hearing is obeying,’ Husam al-Dawla replied, and he had a portion of the
money brought to him right then, and then asked permission for a few days’
grace, the precise period which he fixed, for the payment of the remaining sum.
We then turned back, and thanks to his wise governance his district remained
prosperous and did not suffer the slightest damage.
That was similar to what befell Malik ibn Salim158 [90] (may God have mercy
upon his soul). What had happened was that Joscelin159 had made a raid on al-
Raqqa and al-Qal’a, seizing everything in its vicinity, taking prisoners and
rustling many animals, finally encamping directly across from al-Qal’a, with the
Euphrates between them. Malik ibn Salim set out in a skiff with three or four of
his men and crossed the Euphrates to Joscelin. There were old bonds of
acquaintance between these two and Joscelin actually owed Malik a favour.
Joscelin was under the impression that the skiff merely carried a messenger from
Malik, but one of the Franks came and told him, ‘That’s Malik in the skiff.’
‘That’s not true!’ replied Joscelin.
But another man came and said, ‘Malik just disembarked and here he comes!’
So Joscelin rose and, intercepting Malik, received him generously and returned
to him all the prisoners and animals that he had seized. Thus, had it not been for
Malik ibn Salim’s governing skills, his lands would have been ruined.
When one’s time has come, neither courage nor strength is of any use. I once
witnessed a battle in which the Frankish army had advanced against Shayzar to
attack us. A group of them proceeded with the atabeg Tughdakin to the Bridge
Fortress to attack it. The atabeg, along with Il-Ghazi ibn Artuq and the Franks,
had assembled in Apamea160 to make war on the army of the sultan, which had
arrived in Syria under the command of the isbasalar Bursuq. The isbasalar had
encamped at Hama on Sunday, 19 Muharram of the year [91] 509 (13 June
1115). As for us, we fought against them close to the very walls of the city. But
we prevailed against them and repulsed them, giving them a warm welcome
indeed. I saw one of our comrades called Muhammad ibn Saraya, a young man,
strong and powerful. A Frankish horseman (may God curse him) had rushed on
him and thrust his spear into his thigh, sending his quntariya into it. But
Muhammad grabbed on to the spear while it was in his thigh. Meanwhile, the
Frank was trying to pull the spear out to take it just as Muhammad was trying to
pull it out to keep it, dragging it back and forth through his thigh until it
hollowed his thigh out. But the Frank was deprived of his quntariya after ruining
our man’s thigh. Muhammad died two days later, may God have mercy upon
him.
On that same day, while I was with one part of the army locked in battle, I saw
a cavalryman charge one of our own horsemen and thrust his spear in our
comrade’s horse, killing it. Our man was now fighting on foot on the ground, but
I could not make out who he was due to the distance between us. So I spurred
my horse on towards him, fearing for his safety once that Frank had speared him.
The Frank’s quntariya was still stuck in the man’s horse as it lay there dead with
its intestines spilling out. The Frank withdrew from him a short distance and,
drawing his sword, took his position facing him. As I approached our man, I
discovered that he was my cousin Nasir al-Dawla Kamil (may God have mercy
upon him). So I stopped by him and, removing my own foot from my stirrup,
told him, ‘Mount!’ Once he had mounted, I turned the head of my horse to the
west, with the city lying to the east.
My cousin then asked me, ‘Where are you going?’
I said, ‘Over to that one who put his spear through your horse: now’s our
chance!’
But he just stretched his hand out and grabbed the reins of my horse and said,
‘Never exchange spear-thrusts while there are two men in armour on your horse.
If you get me out of here you can come back and cross spears with him!’ So I
rode off and got him out of there and went back in search of that dog, but by then
he had returned to his comrades.
Among men there are those that go to battle just as the Companions of the
Prophet167 (may God be pleased with them) used to go to battle: to obtain
entrance to Paradise, and not to pursue some selfish desire or to gain a
reputation. Here is an example:
The Frankish king of the Germans (may God curse him), when he arrived in
Syria, [95] assembled all the Franks that were in Syria to his side and marched
on Damascus.168 So the army of Damascus and its populace came out to do battle
with the Franks. Among them were the jurist al-Findalawi and the sheikh and
ascetic Abd al-Rahman al-Halhuli (may God have mercy upon them both). The
two of them were among the most virtuous of all Muslims.169
As they approached the enemy, the jurist said to ‘Abd al-Rahman, ‘Aren’t
these the Romans?’
‘Yes, indeed,’ he replied.
‘Then how long are we going to stand here?’ the jurist asked.
‘Go, in the name of God – may He be exalted!’ replied ‘Abd al-Rahman.
And so the two men advanced and did battle until they were killed in the same
place. May God have mercy upon them both.
Some men fight out of integrity. An example of that is a Kurdish man called
Faris who was like his name, a cavalier170 – and what a cavalier! My father and
uncle (may God have mercy upon them both) fought a battle with Ibn Mula’ib,
who plotted against them and deceived them, for he had mustered and assembled
troops while they were completely unprepared for what happened. The reason
for this was that Ibn Mula’ib had sent a message to them, saying, ‘Let’s go over
to Asfuna,171where there are some Franks, and capture it.’ Our comrades got to
Asfuna before him and, dismounting, attacked the fortress and began sapping the
walls. As they were engaged in battle, Ibn Mula’ib arrived and seized the horses
belonging to our companions who had dismounted. And so fighting broke out
between them, after it had been directed at the Franks, and the fighting grew
fiercer still.
Our Faris the Kurd fought furiously and was injured numerous times. But he
continued fighting even though he ended up getting covered with wounds. Then
the fighting ceased. My father and uncle (may God have mercy upon them both)
passed by Faris as he was being carried away amidst our men. They stopped and
congratulated him for surviving the melee.
To this, Faris replied, ‘By God, I did not fight out of desire for well-being, but
because I am under obligation to you for your many kindnesses and favours [96]
and because I had never seen you in such unfortunate straits as you were during
this battle. So I thought I should go into battle with you and be killed before you
to reward you for your kindness.’
God (glory be to Him) determined that Faris should recover from those
wounds. He then travelled on to Jabala, where Fakhr al-Mulk ibn ‘Ammar172 was
based while the Franks held Latakia. It happened that a group of cavalry went
from Jabala to make a raid on Latakia, while a group of cavalry went from
Latakia to make a raid on Jabala. So the two sides encamped en route, with a hill
standing between them. A Frankish horseman climbed the hill from their side to
reconnoitre from the hill, while Faris the Kurd climbed up from the other side to
reconnoitre for his comrades. The two horsemen encountered one another on the
top of the hill, each one charging on his opponent. They exchanged spear-thrusts
and both fell dead. The horses remained on the hill attacking one another while
the two horsemen lay there dead.
That Faris left with us a son whose name was ‘Allan. He was in the garrison
and owned lovely horses and a splendid outfit, but he was not like his father.
One day Tancred, lord of Antioch, encamped against us, fighting us before
pitching his tents. This ‘Allan, the son of Faris, was stationed on a small
elevation, riding a lovely, sprightly steed, one of the nicest horses around. As he
stood there utterly heedless, a Frankish horseman charged him and thrust a spear
into his horse’s neck. The spear stuck into the horse, so the horse reared and
threw ‘Allan. The Frank then turned back, leading ‘Allan’s horse alongside him
with the spear still in its neck as if he were leading it like a saddle-horse,
swaggering off with his splendid bit of plunder.
§ Faint-Hearted Horses
As for faint-hearted horses and their weakness when wounded, here is an
example.
The army of Damascus, which belonged to Shihab al-Din Mahmud ibn Buri,
was encamped against [98] Hama, which belonged to al-Yaghisiyani, and I was
there too. The Damascenes marched on us in large numbers. The governor of
Hama at the time was al-Yaghisiyani’s son Ahmad, who was on Tall Mujahid.173
The chamberlain Ghazi al-Talli174 came to him and said, ‘Our infantry is spread
out all over the place – you can see their helmets shining among all the enemy
tents. Any moment now the enemy will charge our men and annihilate them!’
‘Then go and pull them back,’ Ahmad replied.
‘By God, the only ones who can pull them back are you and him,’ the
chamberlain said (referring to me).
So Ahmad said to me, ‘You go and pull them back.’
So I pulled a hauberk off one of my attendants who was wearing it and put it
on, rode out and, using my mace, I pulled our men back. I was riding a chestnut
charger, one of the noblest-bred long-necked horses you ever saw. As I was
pulling the men back, the enemy marched on us while there was not a single
horseman outside the walls of Hama besides me. Some of our men fled into the
city, thinking they would most certainly be captured; others marched beside my
stirrup. Because of the narrowness of the place and the press of the crowd, when
the enemy attacked us I had to rein in my horse while facing them, but when
they turned around I would follow behind them cautiously. My horse was struck
by an arrow in its leg, the arrow merely scratching it. But my horse fell to the
ground with me astride it, then rose and fell again, with me beating it all the
while.
One of the men in my escort said to me, ‘Go into the barbican and mount
another horse.’
I said, ‘By God, I will not dismount!’
And thus it was that I observed a weakness in this horse that I never observed
in any other.
My uncle Sultan (may God have mercy upon him) used to make sure that I
kept my presence of mind during battle and would put me to the test with
questions. One day we were engaged in some war or another that had broken out
between us and the lord of Hama, who had mustered and assembled troops,
stationing them in one of the villages of Shayzar, burning and looting. So my
uncle selected about sixty or seventy horsemen from the army and told me,
‘Take these men and set out against the enemy.’ We headed out at full gallop and
soon encountered the vanguard of their cavalry. But we broke them, thrust our
spears at them and dislodged them from the position that they had occupied.
I then dispatched [101] one of the horsemen in my company with a message
for my uncle and father (may God have mercy upon them both), who had taken
up position with the rest of the army, including numerous infantrymen. ‘Move
out with the infantry,’ I said in my message to the two of them, ‘for I’ve broken
the enemy.’ And so they marched out to me, and when they came near we
charged together on the enemy and destroyed them. The enemy launched their
horses into the Sharuf,179 which was in full spate, and swam across it. They went
off and we returned home victorious. My uncle then asked me, ‘What was that
message you sent to me?’
‘I sent a messenger to tell you, “Advance with the infantry, for I have broken
the enemy”,’ I answered.
‘And whom did you send?’ he asked.
‘Rajab al-’Abd,’ I replied.
‘Correct,’ he said. ‘I see that you kept your presence of mind and didn’t get
flustered by battle.’
On another occasion, we and the army of Hama were fighting one another, and
Mahmud ibn Qaraja had secured the assistance of the army of his brother Khir-
Khan ibn Qaraja,180 lord of Homs, against us. At the time, people had just started
using compound spears,181 in which one spear was attached to part of another,
thereby increasing its length to eighteen or twenty cubits. In position facing me
was a detachment of their cavalry, while I was at the head of a band of about
fifteen horsemen. Presently, ‘Alwan the Iraqi charged at us – he was one of their
true cavaliers and braves. But when he got close to us and saw that we weren’t
budging, he turned back, pointing his spear behind him. I noticed that it was like
a rope dragging on the ground and that he wouldn’t be able to lift it back up. So I
launched my charger upon him and thrust my spear into him, even though he had
arrived back among his comrades. I turned around, the enemy banners fluttering
above my head. But my comrades, among them my brother Baha’ al-Dawla
Munqidh (may God have mercy upon him), confronted the enemy and repulsed
them. When I struck that blow, half of my weapon snapped off in ‘Alwan’s
kazaghand.
We happened to be alongside my uncle, who was observing me. So when the
battle ceased, my uncle asked me, ‘Where did you strike ‘Alwan the Iraqi with
your spear?’
[102] ‘I meant to hit him in the back,’ I replied, ‘but the wind pulled at my
spear’s streamer and it landed on his side instead.’
‘Correct,’ he said. ‘I see that you kept your presence of mind that time.’
[103] I never knew my father (may God have mercy upon him) to forbid me
from fighting or riding out into danger despite all the concern and preference he
showed me. I observed this in him on one particular day. At the time, there were
some hostages – some Frankish and Armenian knights – with us at Shayzar that
Baldwin, king of the Franks, had offered as security for the terms of his own
release that he had set with Timurtash182 (may God have mercy upon him). They
paid the amount they owed, but while they were making ready to return to their
territory, Khir-Khan, the lord of Homs, sent a body of cavalry to lie in ambush
for them outside Shayzar. When the hostages set out, the cavalry fell on them,
capturing them. The alarm was sounded, so my uncle and father (may God have
mercy upon them both) rode out and took their position, sending off everyone
who came to them to pursue the hostages. I myself arrived and my father said to
me, ‘Follow them with whatever men you have with you – launch yourselves
upon them and rescue your hostages!’
So I set off in pursuit and caught sight of them after galloping for the better
part of the day. I rescued the hostages they had with them and even captured
some of the cavalry of Homs. I was struck by my father’s words, ‘Launch
yourselves upon them!’
One time I was with him (may God have mercy upon him) while he was
standing in the courtyard of his home. A gigantic snake had stuck its head out on
the frieze atop the arched portico that was in the courtyard, and my father was
standing there looking at it. I went and carried over a ladder that was on one side
of the courtyard, leaned it up just below the snake and climbed up to it – all the
while my father watched me and never forbade me. I took out a little knife from
my waist and poked it into the neck of the snake while it slept – with less than a
cubit between it and [104] my face. I started cutting into its head but the snake
slid out and wrapped itself around my wrist until I cut its head off and threw its
body down to the courtyard, dead.
However, one time I did see my father (may God have mercy upon him) act
differently. We had gone out one day to kill a lion that had appeared near the
Bridge.183 When we arrived, the lion attacked us from the thicket it was in. It
menaced the horses, then stopped while my brother Baha’ al-Dawla Mun-qidh
(may God have mercy upon him) and I stood between the lion and the
detachment of men that my father and uncle were in (may God have mercy upon
them both), which also included a body of troops. The lion had by then gone and
crouched along the edge of the river and was beating the ground with its chest
and roaring. So I attacked it. My father (may God have mercy upon him) shouted
at me, ‘You lunatic! Don’t go anywhere near it! It’ll get you!’ But I thrust my
spear at it and no, by God, it didn’t budge from its place and it died on the spot.
My father never forbade me to fight other than on that one day.
God, the Mighty and Majestic, made His creatures of various sorts,184
differing in temperament and nature: the white and the black, the beautiful and
the ugly, the tall and the short, the strong and the weak, the valorous and the
craven – all in accordance with His wisdom and the universality of His power.
I saw a son of one of the Turkoman amirs who was in the service of the atabeg
Zangi (may God have mercy upon him) when an arrow struck him, though it did
not penetrate his skin deeper than a grain of barley. He went all loose, his limbs
buckled, his ability to speak left him and he lost consciousness. And yet he was a
man like a lion, as massive of body as ever a man could be. They brought the
physician and the surgeon over to him. The physician said, ‘Don’t worry about
him for now. But if he gets wounded again, he’ll die.’ So the man calmed down
and began riding and conducting himself just as he used to. But after a short time
another arrow struck him, even feebler and less harmful than the first, and he
died.
[105] I once saw something else like that. At Shayzar there were two brothers,
called the Banu Majaju. One was named Abu al-Majd, the other Muhasin, and
they were renting Bridge Mill for eight hundred dinars. Near the mill, there was
a slaughtering-place where the butchers of the town used to kill sheep and where
hornets would swarm because of the blood. One day, when Muhasin passed by
the mill, a hornet stung him. He suddenly went stiff, his ability to speak left him
and he seemed on the brink of death. He remained that way for a bit, but then he
regained consciousness and for a while afterwards stopped going to the mill. So
his brother Abu al-Majd chided him, saying, ‘Brother, we’ve got this mill for
eight hundred dinars and you won’t even look over it or check it out! Someday
we’ll be short on our rent and we’ll both die in prison!’
At this, Muhasin exclaimed, ‘You just want another hornet to sting and kill
me!’
And the next morning he went to the mill, where a hornet stung him, and he
died.
Thus may the most harmless things kill if your allotted time is up, and an omen
may employ speech as its agent.185
§ Lions have their Braves and Cowards too: Three Stalwart Specimens
[106] I have seen lions do things I never thought they could do. Yet I would
never have believed that lions, like men, have among them the brave and the
cowardly. Here is an example:
One day our horse-herdsman188 came to us at full gallop and said, ‘There are
three lions in the thickets at Tall al-Tulul!’ So we mounted up and rode over
there and what should we find but a lioness, with two lions behind it. As we
reconnoitred that thicket, the lioness came out and attacked the men but then
stopped. My brother Baha’ al-Dawla Munqidh (may God have mercy upon him)
thrust at the lioness with his spear and killed her, snapping his spear in her body.
We returned to the thicket and one of the two lions came out at us and chased
away the horses. My brother Baha’ al-Dawla and I stopped in its path as it
returned from chasing off the horses. For whenever a lion leaves a place, it is
sure to return to it, no doubt about it. We turned the rumps of our horses towards
the lion and pointed our spears backwards in its direction, since we expected that
it would make straight for us and we would then stick our spears in it and kill it.
But all of a sudden it passed by us like the wind and made for one of our
comrades called Sa’dallah al-Shaybani. The lion struck his horse and brought it
down. I struck at it, thrusting my spear right in its middle, and it died on the spot.
We then turned back to the other lion, accompanied by about twenty men from
our Armenian troops, the finest archers. Out came the other lion walking, the
biggest of the lot. The Armenians kept it at bay with arrows, while I was
positioned to one side of the Armenians expecting the lion to attack them and
grab one of them, at which I would thrust my spear at it. But it kept walking
forward. Every time an arrow would fall on it, it would roar and thrash its tail
and I would say, ‘Now it’s going to attack!’ But then it would walk forward
again. It carried on like this until it fell down dead.
So I observed in that lion something I would never have expected.
§ A Cowardly Lion
I later witnessed something even more marvellous than that in another lion. In
the city of Damascus, there was a lion cub that a lion-keeper raised until it
became full-grown and began chasing [107] horses and thereby caused damage
to some people. The amir Mu’in al-Din (may God have mercy upon him) was
told while I was in his presence, ‘This lion has caused damage to people. The
horses bolt away from it when it is in the road.’
The lion used to spend day and night on a bench near the residence of Mu’in
al-Din. So Mu’in al-Din said, ‘Tell the lion-keeper to bring it here.’
He then said to the table-master,189 ‘Bring out a sheep from the animals to be
slaughtered for the kitchen and leave it in the inner courtyard so we can see how
the lion destroys it.’
And so he brought a sheep out to the courtyard. Then the lion-keeper entered
with the lion accompanying him. The moment the sheep saw the lion – the lion-
keeper having released it from the chain that was around its neck – it charged the
lion and butted at it. The lion fled and took to circling the pool,190while the sheep
was behind it chasing it and butting at it. We were overcome with laughter. The
amir Mu’in al-Din said, ‘This is an ill-omened lion! Take it away, slaughter it,
flay it and bring me its hide.’
And so they slew the lion and flayed it. As for the sheep, it was granted a full
pardon191 from being slaughtered.
[108] I used to marvel at the intrepid spirit of that dog attacking the lion, for
every animal shies away from lions and avoids them. I have seen the head of a
lion carried to one of our houses, at which cats were seen fleeing from the house
in question and throwing themselves from the rooftops, without ever having seen
a lion before. And when we skinned lions, we used to throw the body from the
citadel down to the foot of the barbican and no dog or any kind of bird would
come near it. And if ravens saw the carcass they would descend upon it, but as
they got nearer they would caw and fly off. The fear that the lion induces in
other animals is very similar to the fear that the eagle induces in other birds. For
an eagle, if a chicken that has never seen an eagle before should catch sight of it,
will cause the chicken to scream and flee. Such is the fear that God (may He be
exalted) visits upon the hearts of animals for these two creatures.
On the subject of lions, among our companions we had two brothers called
the Banu al-Ru’am, who were infantrymen and used to go back and forth from
Shayzar to Latakia (Latakia once belonged to my uncle193 ‘Izz al-Dawla Nasr,
and my uncle Sultan was stationed in it – may God have mercy upon them both)
carrying the messages that passed between my two uncles. They told me:
We left Latakia and looked down from al-Manda Pass, which is a high
mountain-pass overlooking all the lowlands below it, and we saw a lion
crouched along the river beneath the pass. So we stopped in our tracks, not
daring to go down for fear of the lion. But then we saw a man approaching.
We shouted at him and waved [109] our clothes at him to warn him about the
lion, but he didn’t hear us. He merely strung his bow, nocked an arrow in it
and walked on. The lion saw him and pounced on him, but the man shot at
him and didn’t miss his heart – he killed it. He walked up to the lion and
finished it off. Taking his arrow, he went to the river and pulled off his shoes,
took his clothes off and climbed in to bathe. He climbed out to put on his
clothes, as we watched, and he began shaking the water out of his hair to dry
it. Then he put on one of his shoes and leaned over on his side. He was
leaning there for a long time, so we said, ‘By God, he didn’t do too badly.
But who’s he showing off to?’
We went down to him while he remained in the same position, and we
found that he was dead. We couldn’t tell what had got him. So we took off
the one shoe from his foot and – guess what? – there was a tiny scorpion
inside that had stung him on his big toe, and he had died instantly. We
marvelled at this giant who killed a lion yet was himself killed by a scorpion
as small as his finger. Glory be to God the Almighty, whose will is ever
executed among His creatures!
[110] As for leopards, fighting them is more difficult than fighting lions,
thanks to their light-footedness and the long distances they can leap. In addition,
leopards will go into caves and burrows like hyenas do, whereas lions will only
go into forests and thickets. A leopard once appeared in our lands in a village in
the district of Shayzar called Ma’arzaf.194 So my uncle Sultan (may God have
mercy upon him) rode out there and sent a horseman to me while I was out
riding on an errand of mine with a message: ‘Meet me at Ma’arzaf.’ So I met up
with him and we went to the spot where they claimed the leopard was, but we
didn’t see it. There was a pit there, so I dismounted from my charger and, taking
my quntariya-spear with me, I sat at the edge of the pit. It was shallow, about the
height of a man, and in its side there was a hole which looked like a burrow. So I
poked my spear in that hole that was in the pit, and the leopard stuck its head out
of that hole to take hold of the spear. Once we had determined that the leopard
was there, a few of my comrades climbed down with me. Some of us began
poking our spears into that spot, so that when the leopard came out the other man
would stab it with his spear. Every time the leopard tried to climb out of the pit,
we would stick it with our spears until we killed it. It was a massive creature. It’s
just that it had eaten so many of the animals of the village that it was unable to
defend itself.
Of all the animals, the leopard alone can jump more than forty cubits. In the
church at Hunak,195 there was a window forty cubits in height above the floor. A
leopard used to go there during the hottest part of the day, jump up to the
window and sleep there until the end of the day, then jump down and go away.
At the time, the landlord196 of Hunak was a Frankish knight called Sir Adam, a
real devil of a Frank. He was told the story of the leopard, and he said, ‘When
you see the leopard, inform me of it.’
The leopard came as usual and jumped up to that window, so one of the
peasants went and informed Sir Adam. Sir Adam put on his hauberk, mounted
his charger, took up his shield and spear and went off to the church, which was
in ruins except for one standing wall where the window was located. When [111]
the leopard saw Sir Adam, it pounced down from the window on top of him
while Sir Adam was still on his charger and broke his back, killing him. It then
went away. The peasants of Hunak used to call that leopard ‘the holy-warrior
leopard’.197
One of the special qualities of the leopard is that if it wounds a man, and a
mouse urinates on the wound, the man will die. A mouse never gives up trying to
reach a man wounded by a leopard: one person, out of fear of the mice, even had
a bed made for himself sitting in the water, with cats tied all around it.
[112] I have heard, though I have not seen it, that there is a variety of wild
beast called a tiger. I didn’t really believe in them, but the sheikh and imam
Hujjat al-Din Abu Hashim Muhammad ibn Muhammad ibn Zafar199 (may God
have mercy upon him) told me:
I once went to the Maghrib accompanied by an elderly attendant who used
to belong to my father and who had travelled and experienced things. Our
supply of water ran out and we were struck with thirst. There was no third
person with us, just the two of us, him and me, riding two well-bred camels.
We made directly for a well on our route, but we found that there was a tiger
by it, sleeping, so we withdrew. My companion dismounted from his camel,
handed me its reins and took up his sword and shield and a water-skin we
had. He said to me, ‘Hold tight to the head of the camel,’ and he walked
towards the well. When the tiger saw him it stood up and jumped, facing him
so that it could pass by him. Then it let out a growl and some cubs rushed out
at full speed to join it. It neither blocked our way nor caused us any harm. So
we drank, replenished our water supply and then went on our way.
This is what he told me (may God have mercy upon him), and he was one of
the most religious and learned Muslims.
[113] One of the marvels of destiny occurred when the Romans came down
against Shayzar in the year 532 (1138). They positioned against it some
terrifying mangonels that they had brought with them from their country for
hurling heavy pay-loads. Their stones, weighing twenty or twenty-five
ratls,200could be launched a distance greater than any arrow could fly. One time
they hurled a piece of a millstone at the house of a companion of mine called
Yusuf ibn Abi al-Gharib (may God have mercy upon him), levelling the house
from top to bottom with one stone.
On top of the tower in the amir’s residence, there was a spear with a banner
attached to it. The path within the citadel that the people took ran right under it.
It happened that a stone from a mangonel hit the spear and snapped it in two, and
the broken half with the spear-head flipped over, spun around and fell into the
path just as one of our comrades was crossing it. The spear-head, attached to the
spear fragment, fell from a great height right through his clavicle and into the
ground and killed him.
Khutlukh, a mamluk belonging to my father (may God have mercy upon him),
related the following account to me:
During the Roman siege, we were sitting in the hallway of the citadel with
our gear and swords when suddenly an old man came [114] running up to us,
saying, ‘Muslims! Your women! The Romans have come in right on our
heels!’ So we grabbed our swords and went out. We discovered that they had
climbed up through a hole that the mangonels had punched into the wall. We
beat them with our swords until we expelled them, and then went out in
pursuit and delivered them to their comrades. Then we came back and
dispersed.
I remained with the old man who had sounded the alarm. He stood there,
and then turned about to face the wall to relieve himself, so I turned away
from him. Next, I heard a loud crash, turned around and, lo and behold, the
old man had been struck on the head by a mangonel-stone, which crushed his
skull and pinned him so that his brains ran down the wall. So I carried him
away and we prayed over him and buried him on the spot, may God have
mercy upon him.
A mangonel-stone also struck one of our comrades and broke his leg. So we
carried him to my uncle as he was sitting in the hallway of the citadel. He said,
‘Go get the bone-setter.’
At Shayzar there used to be an artisan called Yahya, who was skilled at bone-
setting. He presented himself, sat down and began setting that man’s leg-bones,
in a recess just outside the gate of the citadel. But another stone struck that
injured man on the head, smashing it to pieces. The bone-setter returned to the
hallway, so my uncle said, ‘You’ve really set his bones quickly!’
‘My lord,’ he replied, ‘a second stone came and absolved him of the need for
any bone-setting.’
§ The Franks March on Damascus201
Here is an example of the execution of the divine will in the fates and
lifespans of humankind. The Franks (may God confound them) unanimously
agreed to march on Damascus and capture it.202 So they assembled a large host
and the lord of Edessa and Tell Bashir joined them, as did the lord of Antioch.203
The lord of Antioch encamped at Shayzar on his way to Damascus. The Franks
had already haggled between themselves for the houses in Damascus, [115] its
baths and its bazaars, and the burgesses204 had in turn purchased all this from
them and paid out their prices – so little did they doubt that they would conquer
the city and possess it. At that time, Kafartab belonged to the lord of Antioch,
who now selected and removed one hundred horsemen from his army and
ordered them to stay in Kafartab to ward off any attacks from us or from Hama.
When the lord of Antioch left for Damascus, all the Muslims of Syria assembled
to march on Kafartab. They sent one of our comrades called Qunayb ibn Malik
to spy on Kafartab for them during the night. He went to the town, had a look
around and returned, telling us, ‘Rejoice! We can collect our plunder in complete
safety.’
So the Muslims marched against the enemy there and met in battle at
Mudhkin.205 God (glory be to Him) granted victory to Islam and they killed all
the Franks. Qunayb, who had spied on Kafartab for them, had spotted a large
number of animals in the town’s fosse. When they defeated the Franks and killed
them, he wanted to capture those animals, hoping to obtain the plunder all for
himself. So he set off at full gallop to the fosse. But a Frankish soldier hurled a
stone at him from the citadel and killed him.
He left with us his mother, an old woman, who was a public wailer at our
funerals206 and who now wailed for her own son. When she would keen over her
son Qunayb, her breasts would flow with milk, wetting her clothes. But when
she stopped her keening, and her broken heart was quiet, her breasts became
again like two pieces of skin without a drop of milk in them. Glory be to He who
permeates our hearts with tenderness for our children!
When the lord of Antioch, who was just then attacking Damascus, was told
‘The Muslims have killed your comrades’, he said, ‘That’s not true. I left a
hundred horsemen behind at Kafartab who can handle all the Muslims put
together.’
But God (glory be to Him) decreed that the Muslims at Damascus would be
victorious over the Franks and would inflict upon them [116] a great slaughter,
capturing all their animals. And so the Franks left Damascus on a most miserable
and contemptible journey – praise be to God, the Lord of the Worlds!
One of the marvels that occurred during that battle with the Franks was the
following. In the army of Hama, there were two Kurdish brothers, one of them
named Badr and the other named Annaz. Now, this Annaz had bad eyesight. And
when the Franks were defeated and killed, some of the men cut off their heads
and hung them off their saddle-straps. So Annaz cut off a head and hung it from
his saddle-strap.
A group of men from the army of Hama saw him and said to him, ‘Hey,
Annaz, what’s with that head you have with you?’
‘Glory be to God,’ he replied, ‘for what happened between this man and me – I
killed him.’
‘Oh, man,’ they told him, ‘that’s the head of your brother Badr!’
So he looked at the head, examining it. Sure enough, it was the head of his
brother. And so in his shame before the men, he left Hama. We never knew
where he set off for, nor did we ever hear any further news of him. But it was the
Franks who killed his brother Badr during that battle, may God the Exalted
confound them.
The blow of the mangonel-stone upon that old man’s head207(may God have
mercy upon him) has reminded me of the blows of sharp swords. Here is an
example. When the Isma’ilis made an attempt on the citadel of Shayzar,208 one of
our comrades called Hammam the Pilgrim encountered one of the Isma’ilis in a
portico in the residence of my uncle (may God have mercy upon him). The
Isma’ili had a knife in his hand and Hammam had a sword. The Batini209 charged
at him with his knife, but Hammam struck him with his sword above the eyes.
He cut through the top of his skull and his brains fell out, spattering and
spreading out on the ground. Hammam then threw the sword from his hand and
vomited up everything in his stomach, stricken with nausea at seeing those
brains.
[117] On the same day, one of them came at me with a long knife in his hand,
while I had one of my swords. He charged at me with his knife, but I struck him
in the middle of his forearm as he grasped the handle of the knife, its blade held
back close to his raised arm. A length of four finger-widths was cut from the
blade of the knife and his forearm was cut in half, clear off. The traces of that
knife-blade remained ever afterwards on the edge of my sword. An artisan in our
town saw it and said, ‘I can get rid of that dent there.’
But I said, ‘Leave it as it is. It’s the best thing about the sword.’ Even today,
when someone looks at that sword they know it is the mark of that knife.
The second battle between these two was a draw. Some Franks defeated some
Muslims, and some Muslims defeated some Franks. A number of men from both
sides were killed. The Muslims took captive Robert, the lord of Sahyun,
Balatunus215and that area. He was a friend of the atabeg Tughdakin, the lord
[120] of Damascus at that time, and had been with Il-Ghazi when he joined with
the Franks at Apamea when the army of the East arrived under Bursuq.216 This
Robert the Leper had said to the atabeg Tughdakin, ‘I don’t know how best to
offer you my hospitality. However, I give you permission to use my lands. You
may let your horsemen pass through them and they may take whatever they find,
as long as you do not kill anyone or take them captive. But animals, money,
crops: those they have full permission to take.’
Now, when Robert was taken prisoner – and the atabeg Tughdakin had been
present at the battle assisting Il-Ghazi – he set for himself a ransom of ten
thousand dinars. So Il-Ghazi said, ‘Take him to the atabeg. Maybe he can
frighten him into raising his ransom for us.’
So they took Robert to the atabeg, who was in his tent drinking. When
Tughdakin saw Robert approaching, he stood up, tucked the hem of his robe up
under his belt, grabbed his sword, ran out and struck off his head. Il-Ghazi sent a
messenger to the atabeg to reproach him, saying, ‘We need every single dinar to
pay our Turkoman troops. And this man, who had set his ransom at ten thousand
dinars, we sent him to you so you could scare him and he might raise his ransom.
And you killed him!’
Tughdakin replied, ‘I can’t think of a better way to scare someone.’
And so Baldwin the Prince took possession of Antioch. My uncle and father
(may God have mercy upon them both) had him under a great obligation to them
dating from the time when he was the prisoner of Nur al-Dawla Balak (may God
have mercy upon him). After Balak was killed, Baldwin came into the
possession of Timurtash,217 who brought him to us in Shay-zar so that my uncle
and my father (may God have mercy upon them both) might act as middlemen in
ransoming him. They both treated him [121] kindly. Now, when Baldwin took
control, we owed the lord of Antioch an indemnity, but Baldwin exempted us
from paying it.218 Moreover, we gained a certain influence in Antioch.
And so Baldwin was occupying himself with his own affairs – and one of our
messengers was there with him – when a ship arrived at al-Suwaydiya,219
carrying a youth dressed in shabby clothes. He came into the presence of
Baldwin and made him know that he was the son of Bohemond.220 Baldwin
therefore ceded Antioch to him and went out of the city, pitching his tents
outside the town. That messenger of ours who was there with him swore to us
that he (that is, King Baldwin) bought the fodder for his horses that very night in
the marketplace, while the official granaries of Antioch were full of grain.
Baldwin then returned to Jerusalem.
That devil, the son of Bohemond, turned out to be a great affliction for our
people. One day, he encamped against us at the head of his army and pitched his
tents. We had already ridden out to face them, but not a single one of them
attacked us. They just remained in their tents, while we remained in the saddle
on an elevated spot from which we could observe them, with the Orontes
between us. So my cousin Layth al-Dawla Yahya (may God have mercy upon
him) left our group and went down to the Orontes – we assumed he was going to
water his horse. But he waded into the water, crossed over and headed for a band
of Franks standing near their tents. As he approached them, a single knight came
down towards him. The two now charged at each other, but they both swerved
away from the spear-thrust of the other. I immediately sped towards them with
some of my young peers. The rest of the band now came down and the son of
Bohemond and his army also took to their horses and poured down on us like a
torrent. In the meantime, my cousin’s horse had been wounded by a spear-blow.
The vanguard of our cavalry soon met [122] theirs. Now, in our troops there
was a Kurdish man named Mika’il, who came fleeing before the vanguard of the
enemy cavalry, and behind him was a Frankish knight who was sticking close to
him in pursuit. The Kurd was running right in front of him, howling and
screaming at the top of his lungs. So I intercepted the Frank, who turned away
from that Kurdish horseman and darted off my path, heading for some horsemen
in a group of our men positioned beyond us along the river. I went in hot pursuit,
struggling to make my charger catch up with him so I might thrust my spear into
him. But I could not catch up. That Frank did not look back at me until he
reached our horsemen, although I pursued him, his only desire being those
assembled horsemen. My companions now attacked his charger and pinned him
down with their spear-thrusts, but his comrades followed after him and they
outnumbered us. So now the Frankish knight turned back, his charger on its last
legs, and met his comrades and ordered them all to withdraw. And so he went
back, accompanied by his comrades. That knight was none other than the son of
Bohemond, the lord of Antioch. Being still a boy, his heart had become filled
with terror. If he had just left his comrades behind, they would have routed us
and chased us all the way back to town.
As all this was transpiring, an old female servant called Burayka, owned by
one of our Kurdish comrades called ‘Ali ibn Mahbub, was standing there in the
midst of our horsemen on the bank of the river with a jar in her hand, filling it
with water and giving it to our men to drink. Most of our comrades who were on
that elevated spot, once they saw the Franks advancing in such numbers, rushed
back towards the city. But that she-devil just stood there, unafraid of the
fearsome events taking place.
I will now mention something concerning this Burayka, even though it’s not
the place for it, but conversation drifts from one topic to another. [123] Her
master, ‘Ali, was a pious man and never drank wine. One day he said to my
father, ‘By God, amir, I do not consider it licit to subsist on an official stipend. I
will not subsist on anything other than what Burayka brings in.’
So this idiot thinks that that illicit profit was more lawful than the stipend by
which he was employed!221
This servant-woman had a son named Nasr, an older man, and he, along with
another man called Baqiya ibn al-Usayfir, used to act as the supervisor of some
lands that belonged to my father (may God have mercy upon him). This Baqiya
related the following to me:
One night, I went into town on my way to my house on some errand I had
to do. As I approached the town, I could see between the tombstones some
sort of shape by the light of the moon, a shape neither human nor beast. So I
stopped and stood a way off, in fright. But then I said to myself, ‘I’m Baqiya,
am I not? Should I be afraid of some solitary thing?’ So I put down my
sword,222 leather shield and javelin and crept ahead, inch by inch. As I did so,
I could hear a voice coming from that shape and some vulgar singing. Once I
had got close to it, I pounced on top of it, holding my dagger in my hand. I
grabbed on to it and what should it be but Burayka, head uncovered, hair all
wild, sitting astride a reed, neighing and traipsing about the tombs. ‘Shame
on you!’ I said. ‘What are you getting up to at this hour in such a place?’ ‘I
am practising black magic,’ she replied. And so I said to her, ‘May God
abominate you and your magic, and out of all the crafts, may He abominate
this craft of yours!’
The strength of that bitch’s spirit reminds me of the events that happened in
connection with our women during the battle between us and the Isma’ilis, even
though Burayka and our women were hardly of the same sort.
[124] On that day, the leader of the group of Isma’ilis, ‘Alwan ibn Harrar, and
my cousin Shabib (may God have mercy upon him) encountered one another in
the citadel. Shabib was the same age as me and we were born on the very same
day, Sunday, 27 Jumada al-Akhira in the year 488 (4 July 1095), though he had
not seen battle prior to that day, whereas I had become a master of it.
‘Alwan wanted to put Shabib under his obligation, so he said to him, ‘Go back
to your home, carry off whatever you can and get out of here. You won’t be
killed. We’ve already taken the castle.’
So Shabib returned to his house and said, ‘If anyone has any valuable things,
give them to me.’ He said this to his aunt and his uncle’s women. Every one of
them gave him something.
As he was doing this, a figure suddenly entered the house wearing a mail
hauberk and a helmet, with a sword and shield. When Shabib saw this figure, he
felt certain of death. The figure threw off its helmet and behold! It was his aunt,
the mother of his cousin Layth al-Dawla Yahya (may God have mercy upon
him).
‘What is it you are intending to do?’ she asked him.
‘I’m taking whatever I can carry and then I’ll climb down from the castle on a
rope and go and make my way in the world,’ he replied.
‘What a wicked thing you are doing! You would leave the daughters of your
uncle and the rest of your household in the hands of these cotton-carders223 and
just take off? What sort of life would you be living, brought to shame in the eyes
of your family and fleeing from them? Get out there and fight for your family
until you are killed in their midst! And may God do something with you, and do
it again!’224
And so she (may God have mercy upon her) prevented him from fleeing. After
that, Shabib became one of our most noted horsemen.
On that same day, my mother (may God have mercy upon her) distributed my
swords and kazaghand-armour. She came to a sister of mine, an older woman,
and said, ‘Put on your shoes and covering.’
And so she got dressed and my mother took her to a balcony in my house that
looked out over the river valley to the east, and made her sit [125] there while
she took a seat at the entrance to the balcony.
God – glory be to Him – granted us victory over the enemy. But when I came
to my house in search of some of my weapons, I found nothing except the
scabbards of the swords and the sacks for the kazaghands. So I asked, ‘Mother,
where are my weapons?’
‘My son,’ she replied, ‘I gave the weapons to whoever would use them to fight
for us. I didn’t know if you were safe or not.’
I replied, ‘And my sister? What is she doing here?’
‘My son,’ my mother replied, ‘I made her sit here on the balcony while I took
my seat just outside. That way, if I should see that the Batinis had reached us, I
could push her off, throwing her down to the valley. For I would rather see her
dead than see her a prisoner of peasants and wool-carders.’
I thanked her for that, and so did my sister, who prayed that God would reward
my mother on her behalf. Their courage for the sake of honour is more intense
than such courage among men.
At some other time, I went out on the hunt with my father (may God have
mercy upon him). Now, my father was really passionate about hunting, and he
had a collection of goshawks, peregrines, sakers, cheetahs and zaghariya-
hounds225 unlike anything anyone else had. He used to ride out at the head of
forty horsemen who included his sons and his mamluks, each one of them
experienced in the hunt, knowledgeable about the chase. He had at Shayzar two
preferred hunting-grounds: one day he might ride to the marshes and streams to
the west of town to hunt francolin, waterfowl, hare, gazelle, and to kill wild boar.
On another day, he might ride to the hill south of town to hunt partridge and
hare.
One day, when we were on the hill, the time came for the afternoon prayers.
My father dismounted, so we all dismounted and prayed, each of us on our own.
Suddenly, an attendant came galloping up and said, [126] ‘There’s a lion!’ I
therefore finished my prayers before my father (may God have mercy upon
him), so that he couldn’t prevent me from killing the lion. I mounted my horse
with my spear by my side and charged at the lion. The lion faced me and let out
a roar. My horse reared and my spear, because of its weight, fell out of my hand.
The lion chased me for a good stretch, then turned back to the foot of the hill and
stood there. It was one of the biggest lions I had ever seen, like the arch of a
bridge, and ravenous. Every time we approached it, it would come down from
the hill and chase after the horses, then return to its place. It never made a
descent without leaving its mark on our comrades.
I saw it leap onto the haunches of the horse belonging to an attendant of my
uncle called Bastakin Gharza, tearing the man’s clothing and leggings with its
claws. Then it returned to the hill. There was thus no way of getting at the lion
until I climbed above it on the slope of the hill and then rushed my horse down
upon it and thrust my spear at it, piercing it. I left the spear sticking in its side.
The lion then rolled over onto the slope of the hill with the spear still in it. The
lion died and the spear was broken. My father (may God have mercy upon him)
was just standing there watching us; with him were the sons of his brother
Sultan, who were keeping an eye on what happened, and they were just boys.
We carried off the lion and entered the town as night approached. In the dark
of night, my grandmother on my father’s side (may God have mercy upon them
both) came to me, carrying a candle before her. She was a prodigiously old
woman, nearly one hundred years of age. I had no doubt that she had come to
congratulate me on my safety and to inform me of her joy at what I had done.
And so I met her and kissed her hand, but she said to me with annoyance and
anger, ‘My boy, what in the world brings you to face these trials where you risk
your life and your horse, you break your weapons and you simply add to the bad
feelings and ill-will towards you in your uncle’s heart?’
‘My lady,’ I replied, ‘I have only endangered myself today and on similar
occasions to bring me closer to my uncle’s heart.’
‘No!’ she said. ‘By God, this does not bring you closer to him, but rather
increases his estrangement from you and encourages his bad feelings and ill-will
towards you.’
I learned then that she (may God have mercy upon her) was giving me wise
counsel with these words and speaking the truth. By my life, these are indeed the
mothers of men!
And, moreover, this old woman (may God have mercy upon her) was one of
the most upright Muslims in her immaculate approach to religion, her piety,
fasting and prayer. Once, I was present on the night of [127] Nisf Sha’ban226
while she prayed in the home of my father. My father (may God have mercy
upon him) was one of the finest chanters of the Book of God (may He be
exalted), and he led his mother in prayer. My father was concerned for her and
said, ‘Mother, if you take a seat, you can still pray from a seated position.’
‘My son,’ she replied, ‘are there enough days left in my life for me to live to
see another night like this one? No, by God, I will not sit.’ By then my father had
reached seventy years of age while she had approached one hundred (may God
have mercy upon her).
I was a witness to one marvellous example of the courage that women have
for the sake of honour. There was a man among the companions of Ibn Mula’ib
called ‘Ali ‘Abd ibn Abi al-Rayda’, whom God (may He be exalted) had
endowed with eyesight like that of Zarqa’ al-Yamama.227 He used to go on raids
with Ibn Mula’ib and could spot a caravan coming a full day’s distance away.
A fellow member of his gang, called Salim al-’Ijazi, passed into the service of
my father after Ibn Mula’ib was killed.228 He told me:
One day we went out on a raid and sent out ‘Ali ‘Abd ibn Abi al-Rayda’
early in the morning to act as a lookout for us. He came back to us and said,
‘Cheer up, everyone, for soon we’ll have some plunder! There’s a long
caravan headed this way.’ We looked, but we couldn’t see a thing. So we
said, ‘We don’t see a caravan or anything else.’ ‘By God,’ he replied, ‘I’m
telling you I see a caravan! At the front there are two horses with black spots
on their foreheads, shaking their manes.’ We stayed hidden in our ambush
until late afternoon. Then a caravan appeared with two horses at the front,
with black spots on their foreheads. So we rushed out and captured the
caravan.
Salim al-’Ijazi also told me the following tale:
One day we went out on a raid and ‘Ali ‘Abd ibn Abi al-Rayda’ went up
to act as a lookout for us. But he fell asleep, and before he knew it, a Turk
from a detachment [128] of Turks took him captive. They asked him,
‘What’s your business?’ ‘I am a poor beggar,’ he said, ‘and I have rented my
camel to a merchant in a caravan. Give me your hand in promise that you
will return my camel to me and I will lead you to the caravan.’ So the leader
of the Turks gave him his hand. ‘Ali walked along in front of them and led
them to where we were, lying in ambush. So we rushed out at them and took
them captive. As for ‘Ali, he latched on to the Turk that was in front of him
and took his horse and his gear. We carried off some nice plunder from them.
When Ibn Mula’ib was killed, that ‘Ali ‘Abd ibn Abi al-Rayda’ passed into the
service of Theophilos the Frank, lord of Kafar-tab. He used to go out on raids
with the Franks against the Muslims and plunder them. He did as much harm to
the Muslims as he could, seizing their wealth and shedding their blood, to the
point of making the roads unsafe for travellers.
He had a wife at Kafartab, in the hands of the Franks, who objected to what he
did and tried to forbid him from doing so, but he didn’t stop. In the end, she sent
for a relative of hers from some village – her brother, I think – to come to her
and she hid him in the house until nightfall. Then they ganged up on her husband
‘Ali and killed him and ran off with all his belongings. In the morning, she was
with us at Shayzar. She said, ‘On behalf of the Muslims, I was angry because of
what this infidel was doing to them.’ Thus, she gave the people a respite from
that devil. We took special consideration for her, given what she did. She stayed
with us and was treated with great generosity and respect.
§ A Frankish Woman Fights Back
There was an amir in Egypt named Nada al-Sulayhi,229 who had two scars on
his face. One went from his right eyebrow up to his hairline, the other from his
left eyebrow up to his hairline. I asked him about them and he told me:
When I was young, I used to go out on raids from Ascalon on foot. One
day, I was on a raid on the road to Jerusalem hoping maybe to knock off
some Frankish pilgrims. We came across a group of them. I encountered one
of them, a man carrying a spear, with his woman behind him holding a small
rough-ware jar with water in it. The man gave me this first spear-wound, at
which point I hit him [129] and killed him. Then his wife advanced on me
and struck me with that rough-ware jar in my face and made this other scar.
Both of them left their mark on my face.
[132] Glory be to the Creator, the Maker! Indeed, when a person relates
matters concerning the Franks, he should give glory to God and sanctify Him!
For he will see them to be mere beasts possessing no other virtues but courage
and fighting, just as beasts have only the virtues of strength and the ability to
carry loads. I shall now relate something of their ways and the wonders of their
intelligence.
In the army of King Fulk, son of Fulk, there was a respected Frankish knight
who had come from their country just to go on pilgrimage and then return home.
He grew to like my company and he became my constant companion, calling me
‘my brother’. Between us there were ties of amity and sociability. When he
resolved to take to the sea back to his country, he said to me:
‘My brother, I am leaving for my country. I want you to send your son (my
son, who was with me, was fourteen years old) with me to my country, where he
can observe the knights and acquire reason and chivalry. When he returns, he
will be like a truly rational man.’
And so there fell upon my ears words that would never come from a truly
rational head! For even if my son were taken captive, his captivity would not be
as long as any voyage he might take to the land of the Franks.
So I said, ‘By your life, I was hoping for this very thing. But the only thing
that has prevented me from doing so is the fact that his grandmother adores him
and almost did not allow him to come here with me until she had exacted an oath
from me that I would return him to her.’
‘Your mother,’ he asked, ‘she is still alive?’
‘Yes,’ I replied.
‘Then do not disobey her,’ he said.
Here is an example of the marvellous nature of their medicine. The lord of al-
Munaytira234 wrote to my uncle to request that he send him a physician to treat
some of his companions who were ill. So my uncle sent him a native Christian
physician called [133] Thabit. He was barely gone ten days when he returned to
Shayzar. So we said to him, ‘My, you healed your patients so quickly!’ He
explained:
They brought before me a knight in whose leg an abscess had formed and
a woman who was stricken with a dryness of humours.235 So I made a small
poultice for the knight and the abscess opened up and he was healed. For the
woman, I prescribed a special diet and increased the wetness of her humours.
Then a Frankish physician came to them and said, ‘This fellow don’t know
how to treat them.’ He then said to the knight, ‘Which would you like better:
living with one leg or dying with both?’ ‘Living with one leg,’ replied the
knight. The physician then said, ‘Bring me a strong knight and a sharp axe.’
A knight appeared with an axe – indeed, I was just there – and the physician
laid the leg of the patient on a block of wood and said to the knight with the
axe, ‘Strike his leg with the axe and cut it off with one blow.’ So he struck
him – I’m telling you I watched him do it – with one blow, but it didn’t chop
the leg all the way off. So he struck him a second time, but the marrow
flowed out of the leg and he died instantly.
He then examined the woman and said, ‘This woman, there is a demon
inside her head that has possessed her. Shave off her hair.’ So they shaved
her head. The woman then returned to eating their usual diet – garlic and
mustard. As a result, her dryness of humours increased. So the physician
said, ‘That demon has entered further into her head.’ So he took a razor and
made a cut in her head in the shape of a cross. He then peeled back the skin
so that the skull was exposed and rubbed it with salt. The woman died
instantaneously. So I asked them, ‘Do you need anything else from me?’
‘No,’ they said. And so I left, having learned about their medicine things I
had never known before.
Now, I have observed in their medicine a case exactly the opposite of this.
Their king236 named as treasurer one of their knights, called Bernard (may God
curse him), one of the most accursed and filthy Franks around. A horse kicked
him in his leg and his lower leg started to fester and open up in fourteen different
places. Every time these wounds [134] would close in one place, another would
open somewhere else. I prayed that he would just perish. But then a Frankish
physician came and removed all the ointments that were on him and had him
washed with strong vinegar. The wounds closed up and he was well and up
again, like the very devil.
Here is another wondrous example of their medicine. We had at Shayzar an
artisan called Abu al-Fath, who had a son on whose neck scrofula sores had
formed. Every time one would close in one place, another would open up in
another place. Once Abu al-Fath went to Antioch on an errand and his son
accompanied him. A Frankish man noticed him and asked him about the boy.
‘He is my son,’ Abu al-Fath said.
The Frank said to him, ‘Do you swear to me by your religion that, if I
prescribe for you some medicine that will cure your boy, you will not charge
money from anyone else whom you yourself treat with it?’
Our man swore to that effect. The Frank then said, ‘Take him some uncrushed
leaves of glasswort, burn them, then soak the ashes in olive oil and strong
vinegar. Treat him with this until it eats up the pustules in the affected area. Then
take some fire-softened lead and soak it in butter. Then treat the boy with this
and he will get well.’
So our man treated the boy as he was told and the boy got well. The wounds
closed up and he returned to his previous state of health. I have myself treated
people afflicted by this ailment with this remedy, and it was beneficial and
removed all of their complaints.
I saw one of the Franks come up to the amir Mu’in al-Din (may God have
mercy upon him) while he was in the Dome of the Rock,239 and say, ‘Would you
like to see God when He was young?’
‘Why yes,’ Mu’in al-Din replied.
So this Frank walked in front of us until he brought us to an icon of Mary and
the Messiah (Peace be upon him) when he was a child, sitting in her lap. ‘This is
God when He was young,’ he said.
May God be exalted far beyond what the infidels say!240
The Franks possess nothing in the way of regard for honour or propriety.241
One of them might be walking along with his wife and run into another man.
This other man might then take his wife to one side and chat with her, while the
husband just stands there waiting for her to finish her conversation. And if she
takes too long, he’ll just leave her alone with her conversation partner and walk
away!
[136] Here is an example that I myself witnessed. Whenever I went to Nablus,
I used to stay at the home of a man called Mu’izz, whose home was the lodging-
house for Muslims. The house had windows that opened onto the road and,
across from it on the other side of the road, there was a house belonging to a
Frankish man who sold wine for the merchants. He would take some wine in a
bottle and go around advertising it, saying, ‘So-and-So the merchant has just
opened a cask of this wine. Whoever wishes to buy some can find it at such-and-
such a place.’ And the fee he charged for making that announcement was the
wine in the bottle. So one day, he came back home and discovered a man in bed
with his wife. The Frank said to the man, ‘What business brings you here to my
wife?’
‘I got tired,’ the man replied, ‘so I came in to rest.’
‘But how did you get into my bed?’ asked the Frank.
‘I found a bed that was all made up, so I went to sleep in it,’ he replied.
‘While my wife was sleeping there with you?’ the Frank pursued.
‘Well, it’s her bed,’ the man offered. ‘Who am I to keep her out of it?’
‘By the truth of my religion,’ the Frank said, ‘if you do this again, we’ll have
an argument, you and I!’
And that was all the disapproval he would muster and the extent of his sense of
propriety!242
Here is another example. We had with us a bath-keeper called Salim, who was
originally an inhabitant of Ma’arra,243 and who served in the bath-house of my
father (may God have mercy upon him). He told me:
I once opened a bath-house in Ma’arra to earn my living. Once, one of
their knights came in. Now, they don’t take to people wearing a towel about
their waist in the bath, so this knight stretched out his hand, pulled off my
towel from my waist and threw it down. He looked at me – I had recently
shaved my pubic hair – and said, ‘Salim!’ Then he moved in closer to me. He
then stretched his hand over my groin, saying, ‘Salim! Good! By the truth of
my religion, do that to me too!’
He then lay down on his back: he had it thick as a beard down in that
place! So I shaved him and he passed his hand over it and, finding it smooth
to the touch, said, ‘Salim, by the truth of your religion, do it to Madame!’ –
madame in their language means ‘the lady’,244 meaning his wife. He then told
one of his attendants, ‘Tell Madame to come here.’
The attendant went and brought her and showed her in. She lay down on
her back and the knight said, ‘Do her like you did me!’ So I shaved her [137]
hair there as her husband stood watching me. He then thanked me and paid
me my due for the service.
Now, consider this great contradiction! They have no sense of propriety or
honour, yet they have immense courage. Yet what is courage but a product of
honour and disdain for ill repute?
Here is an example close to that one. I once went to the baths in the city of
Tyre245 and took a seat in a secluded room there. While I was there, one of my
attendants in the bath said to me, ‘There are women here with us!’ When I went
outside, I sat down on the benches and, sure enough, the woman who was in the
bath had come out and was standing with her father directly across from me,
having put her garments on again. But I couldn’t be sure if she was a woman. So
I said to one of my companions, ‘By God, go have a look at this one – is she a
woman?’ What I meant was for him to go and ask about her. But instead he went
– as I watched – and lifted her hem and pulled it up. At this, her father turned to
me and explained, ‘This is my daughter. Her mother died, and so she has no one
who will wash her hair. I brought her into the bath with me so that I might wash
her hair.’
‘That’s a kind thing you’re doing,’ I assured him. ‘This will bring you
heavenly reward.’
I was an eyewitness one day in Nablus when two men came forward to fight a
duel. The reason behind it was that some Muslim bandits took one of the villages
of Nablus by surprise, and one of the peasants there was accused of complicity.
They said, ‘He guided the bandits to the village!’ So he fled.
But the king sent men to arrest the peasant’s sons, so the man came back
before the king and said, ‘Grant me justice. I challenge to a duel the man who
said that I guided the bandits to the village.’
The king said to the lord of the village, its fief-holder, ‘Bring before me the
man whom he has challenged.’
So the lord went off to his village, where a blacksmith lived, and took him,
telling him, ‘You will fight in a duel.’ This was the fief-holder’s way of making
sure that none of his peasants [139] would be killed and his farming ruined as a
result.
I saw that blacksmith. He was a strong young man, but lacking resolve: he
would walk a bit, then sit down and order something to drink. Whereas the other
man, who had demanded the duel, was an old man but strong-willed: he would
shout taunts as if he had no fears about the duel. Then the vicomte249 came – he is
the governor of the town – and gave each one of the duellists a staff and a shield
and arranged the people around them in a circle.
The two men met. The old man would press the blacksmith back until he
pushed him away as far as the circle of people, then he would return to the
centre. They continued exchanging blows until the two of them stood there
looking like pillars spattered with blood. The whole affair was going on too long
and the vicomte began to urge them to hurry, saying, ‘Be quick about it!’
The blacksmith benefited from the fact that he was used to swinging a
hammer, but the old man was worn out. The blacksmith hit him and he
collapsed, his staff falling underneath his back. The blacksmith then crouched on
top of him and tried to stick his fingers in the old man’s eyes, but couldn’t do it
because of all the blood. So he stood up and beat the man’s head in with his staff
until he had killed him. In a flash, they tied a rope round the old man’s neck,
dragged him off and strung him up. The blacksmith’s lord now came and
bestowed his own mantle upon him, let him mount behind him on his horse and
rode away with him.
And that was but a taste of their jurisprudence and their legal procedure, may
God curse them!
On one occasion, I went with the amir Mu’in al-Din (may God have mercy
upon him) to Jerusalem, and we stopped at Nablus. While there, a blind man – a
young man wearing fine clothes, a Muslim – came out to the amir with some
fruit and asked him for permission to be admitted into his service in Damascus.
The amir did so. I asked about him and I was told that his mother had been
married to a Frank, whom she had killed. Her son used to attempt various ruses
on their pilgrims, and he and his mother used to work together to kill them. They
finally brought charges against him for that and made him subject to the legal
procedure of the Franks, to wit:
They set up a huge cask and filled it with water and stretched a plank of wood
across it. Then they bound the arms of the accused, tied a rope around his
shoulders and threw him into the cask. If he were innocent, then he would sink
in the water and they would then pull him up by that rope so he wouldn’t die in
the water; if he were guilty, then he would not sink in the water. That man tried
[140] eagerly to sink into the water when they threw him in, but he couldn’t do
it. So he had to submit to their judgment – may God curse them – and they did
some work on his eyes.250
The man later arrived in Damascus, so the amir Mu’in al-Din (may God have
mercy upon him) assigned him a stipend to meet all his needs and said to one of
his attendants, ‘Take him to Burhan al-Din ibn al-Balkhi251 (may God have
mercy upon him) and tell him to order someone to teach the Qur’an and some
jurisprudence to this man.’
At this the blind man said, ‘Victory and mastery be yours! This wasn’t what I
was thinking!’
‘Then what were you thinking I would do?’ asked the amir.
‘That you would give me a horse, a mule and weapons, and make a horseman
out of me!’ the man answered.
The amir then said, ‘I never thought that a blind man would join the ranks of
our cavalry.’
Among the Franks there are some who have become acclimatized and
frequent the company of Muslims. They are much better than those recently
arrived from their lands, but they are the exception and should not be considered
representative.
Here is an example. I sent one of my men to Antioch on an errand. At the time,
Chief Tadrus ibn al-Saffi252 was there, and his word had great influence in
Antioch; there was a mutual bond of friendship between us. One day he said to
my man, ‘A Frankish friend of mine has invited me to his home. You should
come along so you can observe their ways.’ My man told me:
I went along with him and we came to the home of one of the old knights
who came out in one of the first expeditions of the Franks. He was since
removed from the stipend-registry and dismissed from service, but he had
some property in Antioch off which he lived. He presented a very fine table,
with food that was extremely clean and delicious. But seeing me holding
back from eating, he said, ‘Eat and be of good cheer! For I don’t eat Frankish
food: I have Egyptian cooking-women and never eat anything except what
they cook. And pork never enters my house.’ So I ate, though guardedly, and
we left.
After passing through the market, a Frankish woman suddenly hung onto
me while babbling at me in their language – I didn’t understand what she
was saying. Then a group of Franks began to gather around me and I was
certain that I was going to perish. But suddenly, who should turn up but that
knight, who saw me and approached. He came and said to that woman, [141]
‘What’s the matter with you and this Muslim?’
‘This man killed my brother ‘Urs.’253 This ‘Urs was a knight in Apamea
whom someone from the army of Hama had killed.
The knight shouted at her and said, ‘This man is a bourgeois254 (i.e., a
merchant), who neither fights nor attends battle.’ And he yelled at the
assembled crowd and they dispersed. He then took me by the hand and went
away. Thus, the effect of that meal was my deliverance from death.
§ Faint-Hearted Men
§ Stout-Hearted Men
Here is an example that contrasts with the above. Among our comrades of the
Banu Kinana, there was a black man called ‘Ali ibn Faraj, in whose foot there
developed a pustule, which just became worse. His toes fell off and the rest of
his leg began to rot. The surgeon said to him, ‘There is no treatment for your leg
except amputation. If you don’t have it done, you will die.’
So the surgeon went and got a saw and started to saw his leg until ‘Ali fainted
from the loss of blood. Once he regained consciousness, the surgeon would start
sawing away again until finally he cut his leg off at the middle. They treated it
and it was healed.
This ‘Ali (may God have mercy upon him) was one of the most enduring and
powerful men. He used to ride in the saddle with one foot in a stirrup and, on the
other side, he would put his knee in a strap. In this state he would attend battle
and exchange spear-thrusts with the Franks. I used to see him with my own eyes
(may God have mercy upon him): no man could match him at arm-wrestling or
keep a hold on him.
Yet with all his strength and courage, he was a light-hearted fellow. Early one
morning, while he and the Banu Kinana were living in our fortress at the Bridge,
he sent a message to some of the leaders of the Banu Kinana, saying, ‘It’s a rainy
day today and I haven’t got any flour, bread or wine in the house. Yet all of you
have in your homes everything you need for the day. I propose that you send to
your homes and have your food and wine brought out – I’ll provide the house.
Let’s get together today to drink and shoot the breeze.’
To this they all replied, ‘Fine! Great idea, [147] ‘Ali!’
They then sent for and brought out all the food and drink from their homes and
passed their day at his place. He was quite a respected man. Exalted is He who
created His creatures in various sorts!260 How can the endurance and
stoutheartedness of this man be compared to the weakness and faint-heartedness
of those others?
The following is an example similar to that case. A man from the Banu Kinana
told me at the Bridge Fortress that there was a man there who had been afflicted
with dropsy. But he sliced open his stomach and recovered, returning to health as
he was before. I said, ‘I would like to examine this man and get some
information out of him.’
The one who told me about this man was someone from the Banu Kinana
called Ahmad ibn Ma’bad ibn Ahmad. He brought the man before me and I got
information from him about his condition and how he did what he did to himself.
He said:
I am just a poor beggar, all on my own. My abdomen became afflicted
with dropsy and I got so big that I was unable to move, and I grew weary of
life. So I took a razor and cut myself with it above my navel, across my
abdomen, and sliced myself open. About two cooking-pots-worth of water
(meaning two measures) came out of it. The water continued to seep out until
my abdomen shrank back. I then stitched it up, treated the wound and it was
healed. In this way my ailment passed.
He then showed me the scar where he had sliced himself open on his
abdomen, which was more than a span in length. There is no doubt that this man
still had a livelihood on earth that was yet due to him.
In other cases, I have seen people afflicted with dropsy who had their
physician bleed their abdomen and extract water from it – just as the water came
out of this man who punctured himself – yet who nevertheless died from the
blood-letting. Fate is indeed an impregnable citadel.
Victory in war is from God alone (may He be blessed and exalted), not from
organization or skilled conduct, and not from strength of numbers of troops or
allies.
Whenever my uncle (may God have mercy upon him) used to send me to fight
Turks or Franks, I would ask him, ‘My lord, tell me how I should conduct
myself when I finally meet the enemy.’
‘War conducts itself, my boy,’ he would say. And he was right.
[148] He once asked me to take his wife, Khatun261 bint Taj al-Dawla Tutush,
and his sons with the army and proceed to Masyaf Castle, which belonged to
him at the time, hoping to spare them the heat of Shayzar.262 I rode out, and my
father and uncle (may God have mercy upon them both) rode with us for part of
the way, and then returned, accompanied only by the young mamluks to lead the
pack horses and carry the weapons. The entire army remained with me. When
my father and uncle approached the town, they heard the beating of war-drums
coming from the Bridge.263 They said, ‘Something is happening down at the
Bridge,’ and spurred their horses towards it. At the time, there was a truce
between us and the Franks (may God curse them!). Nevertheless, the Franks had
sent some men to scout a ford for them by which they might cross over to the
part of town by the Bridge. This was on a peninsula to which no one could cross
except by an arched bridge of stone and lime mortar, and which the Franks could
not reach. But a scout showed them a place to ford. So they all rode from
Apamea and, the next morning, found themselves at that spot that the scout had
indicated. They then crossed the water, took possession of the town, pillaged it,
took away prisoners and killed some people. They dispatched some of the
plunder and captives back to Apamea. They also took possession of the houses,
every one of them affixing a cross-symbol to a house and raising his banner over
it.
When my father and uncle (may God have mercy upon them both) approached
the citadel, the inhabitants shouted, ‘God is great!’ and gave forth a cry. In this
way God, glory be to Him, struck terror and despair into the Franks and so they
forgot the spot by which they had crossed. Dressed in their mail hauberks, they
urged their horses into the river where there was no ford. As a result, a large
number of them were drowned. A rider would plunge into the water, fall from his
saddle and sink in the water, only the horse coming out of it. Those of them that
survived ran away in flight, [149] without anyone paying heed to anyone else.
And although they were a numerous force, my father and uncle had with them
only ten young mamluks.
My uncle took position at the Bridge, while my father returned to Shayzar. As
for me, I delivered the sons of my uncle to Masyaf and returned home on the
same day, arriving in the evening. I was informed about what had happened, so I
presented myself before my father (may God have mercy upon him) and sought
his counsel over whether I should go and join my uncle at the Bridge Fortress.
‘You will arrive at night,’ he said, ‘while they are sleeping. Go to them instead
early in the morning.’
And so the next morning I went out and presented myself before my uncle. We
went riding and stopped at that spot where the Franks had drowned. A group of
swimmers had come down to the place and were pulling out some of their dead
horsemen.
‘My lord,’ I said to my uncle, ‘why don’t we cut off their heads and dispatch
them to Shayzar?’
‘Make it so,’ he replied. We cut off about twenty heads and the blood flowed
from the dead bodies as if they had been killed that very moment, yet they had
been there a day and a night. I believe the water preserved the blood inside them.
The local people took many weapons from them as plunder, including mail,
swords, quntariya-spears, helmets and mail chausses.264
Indeed, I saw one of the peasants of the Bridge present himself before my
uncle with his hand beneath his clothes.
My uncle said to him, playfully, ‘And what is it you’ve set aside for me as
plunder, then?’
He replied, ‘I have set aside for you a charger with its tack and horse armour,265
a shield and a sword.’ And he went and brought this all before him.
My uncle accepted the horse’s tack, but granted the charger to him, and asked,
‘But what’s that in your hand?’
‘My lord,’ the peasant replied, ‘me and a Frank got to grappling and I didn’t
have any gear or sword. So I threw him down and punched him in the face, even
though he was covered with an aventail, until I knocked him out. Then I took his
sword and killed him with it. But the skin on my knuckles was all torn to shreds
and my hand swelled up and was of no use to me.’
He then showed us his hand, which was just as he had said – even the bones of
his fingers were exposed.
In the garrison of the Bridge was a Kurdish man called Abu al-Jaysh, who had
a daughter named Raful, who had been carried off by the Franks. Abu al-Jaysh
became pathologically obsessed with her, saying to everyone [150] he met,
‘Raful has been taken captive!’
The next morning we went out to walk along the river and we saw a form by
the bank of the river. We told one of the attendants, ‘Swim over there and find
out what that thing is.’
He made his way over to it, and what should the form be but Raful, dressed in
a blue garment. She had thrown herself from the horse of the Frank who had
captured her and drowned. Her dress was caught in a willow-tree. In this way
were the pangs of despair of her father silenced.
Thus, the cry that frightened the Franks, their flight and their destruction were
all due to the benevolence of God, the Mighty and Majestic, not due to any
power or army. Blessed indeed is God, who is capable of whatever He wills.
That said, overawing the enemy can sometimes be effective in warfare. Here
is an example:
In the year 529 (spring 1135), the atabeg arrived in Syria, and I with him, and
he continued onward intending for Damas-cus.266 When we encamped at al-
Qutayyifa, al-Yaghisiyani (may God have mercy upon him) said to me, ‘Saddle
up and go ahead of us to al-Fustuqa.267 Take up a position along the road so that
none of the troops can flee towards Damascus.’
So I went on ahead and took up my position for a while, when al-Yaghisiyani
arrived at the head of a small detachment of his comrades. We could see smoke
coming from ‘Adhra’, so we sent some cavalry to go and find out what all the
smoke was. It turned out it was a detachment from the army of Damascus
burning the hay in ‘Adhra’, and they took flight. Al-Yaghisiyani pursued them,
with us accompanying him, amounting to maybe thirty or forty horsemen, and
we arrived at al-Qusayr, where what should we find, but the army of Damascus
in its entirety, cutting us off from the bridge. We were by then at the khan
itself.268 So we halted, taking cover behind the khan. [151] Five or six of our
horsemen would then go out so that the army of Damascus could catch sight of
them, and then they would go back behind the khan, fooling them into thinking
we had set up an ambush there.
In the meantime, al-Yaghisiyani sent a horseman to the atabeg to inform him of
what we were up against. Soon we saw about ten horsemen approaching us at
top speed, our army marshalled behind them. The horsemen arrived at our
position and we saw that it was the atabeg leading the vanguard, with the army
in tow.
The atabeg rebuked al-Yaghisiyani for what he had done, saying, ‘You ran
ahead to the very gate of Damascus with only thirty horsemen just to ruin my
reputation!’269 And he cast blame on him. They were both speaking in Turkish,
so I did not understand what they were saying.
When the vanguard of the army arrived, I said to al-Yaghisiyani, ‘By your
leave, I will take these men who have just arrived, cross over to the Damascene
cavalry stationed opposite us and dislodge them.’
‘No,’ he replied. ‘Whoever loyally works in the service of this man is a dirty
little so-and-so!270 Didn’t you just hear what he said to me?’
Had it not been for the benevolence of God (may He be exalted), and that
attempt to overawe and play with the imagination of the enemy, they would have
removed us.
A similar thing happened to me. I had set out with my uncle (may God have
mercy upon him) from Shayzar, making for Kafartab. We were accompanied by
a crowd of peasants and beggars who were to plunder the crops and cotton in the
environs of Kafartab. The people all spread out in plunder, while the cavalry of
Kafartab had taken to their mounts and were positioned outside town. But we
stood between them and the people spreading out through the fields and cotton.
Suddenly, one of our comrades, a horseman, came galloping from the scouts and
said, ‘The cavalry of Apamea has come!’
At this, my uncle said, ‘You take up your position opposite the cavalry of
Kafartab, while I go at the head of the troops to intercept the cavalry of
Apamea.’
I took up my position with ten horsemen, hidden in the midst of some olive
trees. Of these, three or four would leave us to worry the imaginations of the
Franks, and then return to the olive trees. The Franks, thinking that we were a
large group, would assemble, cry out and urge their horses [152] closer to us.
But we remained unfazed and they retreated. We remained in that position until
my uncle returned, having routed the Franks who had come from Apamea.
One of his attendants said to him, ‘My lord, did you see what he (meaning me)
has done? He stayed behind and didn’t go with you to intercept the cavalry of
Apamea.’
My uncle responded, ‘If it were not for the fact that he took his position with
ten horsemen opposite the cavalry and infantry of Kafartab, the Franks would
have taken the whole crowd captive.’
Thus, overawing and playing upon the imagination of the Franks was, on that
occasion, more effective than fighting them, since we were but a small
detachment and they a large group.
I was involved in a similar case at Damascus. One day, I was accompanying
the amir Mu’in al-Din (may God have mercy upon him) when a horseman came
to him and said, ‘Bandits have captured a caravan carrying a load of raw cloth up
in the pass!’
‘Let’s ride after them,’ he said to me.
‘As you command,’ I replied. ‘But order the officers of the guard271 to have the
troops ride out with you.’
‘What do we need the troops for?’ he asked.
‘Would it hurt to have them ride with us?’ I responded.
‘We don’t need them,’ he retorted. He was one of the bravest of horsemen, but
in certain circumstances, such stoutheartedness can be a fatal flaw and a real
liability.
We rode out with about twenty horsemen. Shortly before noon, we sent two
horsemen out this way, two that way, two yet another way and one horseman
some other way in order to reconnoitre the roads. We continued on our way in a
small band and then the time for mid-afternoon prayer came. Mu’in al-Din said
to an attendant of mine, ‘Sawinj, go up and keep watch to the west until we are
done praying.’ We had barely finished the last of our prayers when that attendant
came galloping towards us.
‘There are men on foot’, he said, ‘bearing bolts of raw cloth on their head,
down in the valley!’
‘Let’s ride!’ said Mu’in al-Din (may God have mercy upon him).
‘Give us a second to put on our kazaghands. Then when we find the bandits,
we can charge at them with our horses and run them through with our spears,
and they won’t even be able to tell whether we are many or few.’
The amir replied, ‘We can put our armour on when we get there!’ [153] and
rode off as we headed towards them.
We encountered them in the Valley of Halbun,272 which is a narrow valley
where the distance between the two mountains alongside is perhaps five cubits.
The mountains on either side are rough and steep and the path is so narrow that
horsemen can only pass through one after the other. Yet the bandits were about
seventy men, wielding bows and arrows.
When we reached the bandits, our attendants were still behind us with our
weapons and unable to get to us. And those bandits: there was a group of them in
the valley and a group of them on the slope of the mountain. But I thought that
the people in the valley were our men, some peasants from the village who had
come out in pursuit of the bandits, and that the men on the slope of the mountain
were the real bandits. So I drew my sword and charged those who were on the
slope. My horse climbed up that rough slope but nearly breathed its last breath.
When I got to them, with my horse stopped still, unable to advance further, one
of the bandits nocked an arrow in his bow to shoot me. But I shouted at him and
threatened him and he held back. I then made my horse climb down again,
hardly believing that I had escaped from them.
The amir Mu’in al-Din climbed to the top of the mountain, thinking he could
find some peasants there that he could get to chase the bandits. He shouted at me
from the top of the mountain, ‘Don’t leave them before I get back!’ and then
disappeared from sight.
So I returned to that group in the valley, having learned in the meantime that
they were part of the bandit-party. I charged at them on my own, due to the
narrowness of the place, and they fled, throwing down the raw cloth they had
with them. I also liberated two animals that were likewise bearing loads of raw
cloth. The bandits climbed up to a cave on the slope of the mountain as we
watched them, without us having any way to get to them.
The amir Mu’in al-Din (may God have mercy upon him) came back at the end
of the day without finding anyone to get to chase the bandits. If we had only had
the army with us, we would have struck off all the heads of those bandits and
recovered everything that they had with them.
Something like this happened to me on another occasion, too. It was a result of
the execution of the divine will and also a lack of experience in warfare. It
happened like this:
We set out with the amir Khusraw ibn [154] Talil, making for Damascus to
enter the service of Nur al-Din273 (may God have mercy upon him), eventually
arriving at Homs. When Khusraw decided to continue via the Baalbek road, I
said to him, ‘I’ll go on ahead of you so I can have a look at the Church of
Baal,274 until you arrive.’
‘Make it so,’ he replied.
I mounted up and set out. When I was inside the church, a horseman arrived
from Khusraw, with his message: ‘Some bandits on foot have attacked a caravan
and captured it. Saddle up and meet me in the mountains.’
So I mounted my horse and met up with him. We climbed into the mountains
and spotted the bandits in a valley below us, the mountain that we were on being
surrounded by the valley in question. One of Khusraw’s companions said to him,
‘You should go down and get them.’
But I said, ‘You shouldn’t do that. Let’s instead make our way around the
mountain until we get right above their heads and we can interpose ourselves
between them and their path off to the west and then capture them.’ For the
bandits had come from the territory of the Franks.
Another person said, ‘In the time it will take us to go around the mountain, we
could go down and capture them.’ So we went down. But once the bandits
caught sight of us, they climbed up into the mountains.
So Khusraw said to me, ‘Climb up after them!’ I tried my hardest to climb up,
but I could not do it.
Now, there remained six or seven of our horsemen on the mountain. They went
on foot, leading their horses with them, towards the bandits, who formed a large
group. The bandits attacked our comrades and killed two of our horsemen. They
took their two horses as well as another horse, whose owner survived safely. The
bandits then climbed down the opposite side of the mountain with their plunder.
And so we went back, two of our horsemen dead, and three horses and a
caravan captured. This heedless risk-taking was the result of a lack of experience
in matters of war.
As for taking risks in acts of valour, it does not happen because one has
renounced life. Indeed, it comes about when a man [155] becomes known for his
audacity and is given the label of courage. When he then takes part in battle, his
ambition demands that he perform noteworthy deeds that his peers cannot
accomplish. His spirit so quails at death and riding into danger that it almost
overwhelms him, stopping him from what he wants to do, until he forces his
spirit and makes it undertake that which it hates to do. As a result, shudders
spread throughout his body and his colour changes. But when he enters into
battle, his terror disappears and his cravenness subsides.
I was present at the siege of the citadel of al-Sawr with the King of Amirs, the
atabeg Zangi (may God have mercy upon him), someone I have already touched
on. The citadel belonged to the amir Qara Arslan (may God have mercy upon
him), and was fully manned with crossbowmen. This was after Zangi’s defeat at
Amid.275 As soon as his tents were set up, Zangi dispatched one of his comrades,
who shouted up underneath the citadel, ‘Enemy crossbowmen! The atabeg says
to you, “By the grace of the sultan, if but one of my comrades is killed by your
arrows, I will absolutely cut off your hands.”’
Zangi then set up the mangonels against the citadel, which took down one side
of it. But not enough of it was brought down for the men to use the breach to get
up into the citadel. However, one of the atabeg’s bodyguards, a man from
Aleppo called Ibn al-’Ariq, climbed up through the breach and set to striking the
enemy with his sword. But they injured him with a number of wounds and threw
him down from the tower into the moat. By then, our men had overwhelmed
them at that breach and we took possession of the citadel. The representatives of
the atabeg climbed up to the citadel and took possession of its keys, sending
them to Timurtash, and granting Zangi the citadel.
[156] Now, it happened that a crossbow-bolt struck a man from the
Khurasanian troops in his knee, cutting through the cap that is on top of the joint,
and he died. The moment the atabeg took possession of the citadel, therefore, he
summoned the crossbowmen, who were nine in number. They came with their
bows slung from their shoulders. Zangi ordered that their thumbs be sliced from
their wrists so their hands became limp and useless.
As for Ibn al-’Ariq, he treated his wounds and recovered after being at death’s
door. He was a brave man who pushed himself to face all manner of dangers.
I saw something like that on yet another occasion. The atabeg had encamped
before the citadel of al-Bari’a,276 which is surrounded by solid rock upon which
tents cannot be pitched. The atabeg therefore encamped in the plain and
delegated his amirs to conduct the siege in turns. One day, the atabeg rode over
to the siege; it was the turn of the amir Abu Bakr al-Dubaysi,277but he did not
have sufficient materiel for battle. The atabeg stopped there and said to Abu
Bakr, ‘Advance and fight them!’ So Abu Bakr marched at the head of his
comrades even though they were practically unarmed, and the infantrymen from
the citadel came out to attack them. At this, one of Abu Bakr’s comrades, called
Mazyad, who was not then known for his prowess in battle or his courage, came
forward and fought furiously, striking at them with his sword and dispersing
their crowds. He was wounded many times. I saw him as they carried him back
to camp and he was about to breathe his last breath. But then later he got well.
Abu Bakr al-Dubaysi presented him and Zangi promoted him and invested him
with a robe of honour and made him a member of his own bodyguard.
The atabeg used to say to me, ‘I have three retainers:278 one of them fears God
(may He be exalted) but does not fear me [157] (meaning Zayn al-Din ‘Ali
Kujak, may God have mercy upon him); the second fears me, but does not fear
God (may He be exalted) (meaning Nasir al-Din Sunqur, may God have mercy
upon him); and the third fears neither God nor me (meaning Salah al-Din al-
Yaghisiyani, may God have mercy upon him).’
I witnessed something of al-Yaghisiyani (may God overlook his excesses) that
confirms what the atabeg said. One day we marched against Homs. But the night
before, such a great rain had fallen on the ground that the horses were unable to
manage with the thick layer of mud there, while our infantry were already
engaged. Al-Yaghisiyani had halted and I was by his side, and we could see the
infantry before us. Just then, one of our infantrymen ran over to the infantry of
Homs and hid among them while al-Yaghisiyani watched him. So he said to one
of his comrades, ‘Go and fetch the man who was next to the one who deserted.’
And he went and got him.
Al-Yaghisiyani asked him, ‘Who was that who fled from his post by your side
and entered Homs?’
‘By God, my lord,’ the soldier replied, ‘I don’t know him.’
‘Cut this man in half!’ ordered al-Yaghisiyani.
At this, I said, ‘My lord, you should imprison this man and investigate further
the case of that man who deserted. If it turns out that he does know him or is
related to him, then you can execute him. If not, then you can deal with him as
you see fit.’
He looked as if he was inclined to my suggestion, but a retainer of his standing
behind him said, ‘If a soldier flees, the man that was next to him is taken and
either has his head struck off or is cut in half.’
The retainer’s words revived al-Yaghisiyani’s rancour and so he ordered him to
be cut in half. They trussed the soldier up following the usual procedure and
chopped him in two. But no fault can be brought to al-Yaghisiyani except for his
obstinacy and his lack of fear of the punishment of God, may He be exalted.
I was in his presence on another occasion after our return from the battle at
Baghdad.279 The atabeg was going to great lengths to give an appearance of
endurance and strength and had ordered al-Yaghisiyani to march against the amir
Qafjaq and [158] take him by surprise. We set out from Mosul for a journey of
six days, although we were extremely weak. When we arrived at Qafjaq’s
location, we found that he had perched himself up in the mountains of
Kuhistan.280 So we went down to a fortress called Masurra and encamped against
it at sunrise.
Just then, a woman came up to us from the fortress, saying, ‘Have you got
some raw cloth with you?’
We replied, ‘Is this really the time for buying and selling?’
‘We need the cloth’, she said, ‘to use as your winding-sheets. In five days,
you’ll all be dead.’ By this, she was telling us that the place was stricken with
disease.
Al-Yaghisiyani set up camp and planned out an attack on the fortress for the
early morning. He ordered the sappers to go in under the walls of one of the
towers, since the fortress was built entirely of mud-brick, and the soldiers
manning it were just peasants. Meanwhile, we marched on the fortress and
climbed up towards its hill. The Khurasanian troops undermined one tower,
which collapsed with two men on it. One of these men was killed, but the other
was taken captive by our comrades, who brought him to al-Yaghisiyani
‘Cut him in half!’ he said.
‘My lord,’ I said, ‘this is the month of Ramadan, and this man is a Muslim. We
cannot bear such a sin.’
Al-Yaghisiyani replied, ‘Cut him in half so they’ll surrender the fortress!’
‘My lord,’ I said, ‘you will be taking possession of the fortress in but a
moment.’
‘Cut him in half,’ he repeated. And they trussed the man up and chopped him
in two.
We took the fortress that very moment.
Al-Yaghisiyani then went to the gate, intending to descend from the fortress, a
crowd and the victors accompanying him.
He delegated control of the fortress to a group of his comrades and went on
down to his tent just for a moment, but long enough for the army that was with
him to disperse. Then he took to his horse and said to me, ‘Mount up!’
We rode out and climbed up to the fortress, where he seated himself and
ordered the intendant of the fortress to be brought before him so that he might
find out from him what was in it. He likewise had the women and children
brought before him, Christians and Jews.
An old Kurdish woman came and presented herself before him. She asked the
intendant of the fortress, ‘Have you seen my son?’ and gave his name.
‘Killed,’ he replied. ‘An arrow got him.’
‘And my other son?’ she asked, giving his name.
‘The amir cut him in half,’ he replied.
The woman screamed and uncovered her head, her hair looking like carded
cotton.
[159]’Quiet! The amir!’ said the intendant of the fortress to her.
‘And what more could he possibly do to me?’ she asked. ‘I had two sons and
he has killed them both!’
But they just pushed her away.
The intendant then went and brought forward a very old man, with lovely
white hair, who was walking on two canes. He greeted al-Yaghisiyani.
‘And who is this old man?’ asked the amir.
‘The imam of the fortress,’ replied the keeper.
‘Come forward, old man,’ the amir beckoned, saying, ‘Come, come,’ until the
old man sat before him. The amir then reached out and grabbed the old man’s
beard and, pulling out a knife that was hanging from the belt of his robe, cut off
his beard right close to his chin and dangled it from his hand like a parcham-
ornament.281
So the old man said to him, ‘My lord, what have I done to make you do such a
thing to me?’
‘You have rebelled against the sultan!’ he replied.
‘By God,’ the old man responded, ‘I didn’t even know you had arrived until
just now when the intendant came and told me when he summoned me.’
We then departed and encamped against another fortress belonging to the amir
Qafjaq, called al-Karkhini.282 We captured it and found there a treasury full of
raw cloth that had been woven as alms for the poor of Mecca. Al-Yaghisiyani
also took captive all the Jews and Christians in that fortress, people of the
covenant, and plundered both fortresses as if he were plundering Romans!283
Glory be to God, and may He overlook his excesses.
I will stop in this section at this point, following the example of my own
verses:
Stop now from the mention of those whom passion has slain,
Their tale would turn the hair of our newborns white.
[162] If only the heart could be made clean of sin’s filthy sheen and entrusted
to the Knower of the unseen, for riding forth into war’s perils – you will have
reckoned – will not shorten your term by even a second.
On the day when we encountered the Isma’ilis in the citadel of Shayzar, I saw
in those events, indeed, an example from which to derive a lesson that clarifies,
for intelligent brave just as for ignorant knave, that the duration of life has been
already appointed and made, and one’s fate can neither be hastened nor delayed.
It happened that day, that after being done with the war, someone at the edge of
the citadel cried, ‘Wait, here’s some more!’ I had with me a group of my
comrades bearing their weapons, so we rushed over to the man who had cried
out.
‘What’s all this about?’ we asked.
‘There are sounds of the enemy coming from over there,’ he replied.
We all crossed over to an empty, darkened stable and went inside. We
discovered that there were two armed men there and killed them both. We also
found one of our own comrades who had been killed, but he was lying on top of
something. Lifting him up, we discovered another Batini, who had wrapped
himself up in a cloth like a shroud and covered himself with the dead body of
our comrade. So we lifted off the body of our comrade and killed the man hiding
underneath him and placed the body of our comrade, covered in terrible wounds,
inside the nearby mosque, never doubting that he was dead, since he neither
stirred nor breathed. I swear by God that I even nudged his head with my foot as
he lay there on the floor of the mosque, and we never doubted that he was dead.
The poor fellow had been passing that stable and had heard something, so he
stuck his head in to investigate. But one of the enemy pulled him in and they
stabbed him with their knives until they thought he was dead. But God, may He
be exalted, decreed that, once those wounds on his neck and body were all
stitched up, he would recover and return to the state of health that he had
previously enjoyed. Blessed be God who determines all fates and fixes our
destiny and our life’s term!
I witnessed something similar. It happened when the Franks (God curse them)
made a raid against us during the last third of the night. We mounted up,
intending to go in pursuit of them, but my uncle Sultan (may God have mercy
upon him) [163] prevented us from doing so, saying, ‘A raid conducted at night?
It’s a trick!’286 But some of our infantry left the town in pursuit of them anyway,
without our knowing. On their way back, the Franks fell upon them to kill them,
but a few escaped.
The next morning, as I was standing in Bandar Qanin, a village near town, I
caught sight of three people approaching: two of them looked human enough,
but the middle one, his face was not like the face of a man. As they got closer to
us, it became clear that the one in the middle had been hit by a Frankish sword in
the middle of his nose and his face was cut through clear to his ears. Half of his
face was so loose that it hung down to his chest. Between the two halves of his
face was a cut almost as wide as a hand’s span, and so he walked between the
other two men. He entered town and the surgeon stitched up his face and treated
his wound. The wound eventually closed up and he recovered, returning to his
previous state of health until he died of natural causes in his own bed. He used to
sell work-animals and was named Ibn Ghazi the Scarred, but he only got that
name after he received that blow.
Thus, let no one assume that death is hastened by facing straits that are dire,
nor is it delayed if you choose to retire; indeed the example of my long life
provides lessons for you to acquire. For how many terrors have I faced, how
many dangers and fears have I out-raced? Horsemen I have battled, lions I have
grappled, struck have I been by blades, run through have I been by spears, pelted
have I been with arrows and with stones, all while I from Fate was like a stout
fortress without fear, that is, until I completed my ninetieth year. For then I came
to see health and lingering ease like the Prophet (upon him be peace): ‘Health
suffices as its own disease.’ Indeed, the result of my escape from those frights is
something more daunting than all those earlier battles and fights. Far easier is
death at an army’s head than the taxations of a lingering life of pain and dread.
For the passage of time has removed, from my life’s long measure, all objects of
joy and gentle pleasure. Now this does misery’s dust-storm obscure: an ample
life, once so pure. I am as I once described in verse:
After eighty years, Time begins to work its mischief on my constitution:
The weakness of my foot, the trembling of my hand, they grieve me.
Even as I write, my lines seem troubled
Like the writing of one with hands terror-stricken, palsied.
I wonder at this feebleness in my hands as they lift up a pen
When previously they had shattered spears in the hearts of lions.
If I walk, it is with cane in hand, bemired
Are my legs as if I waded through a mud-soaked plain.
[164] So say to him who hopes his life will be a long one:
‘These are the consequences of long life and age.’
For weakness and feebleness have replaced my power, all sweetness in life
has ended and reached its hour. This long sojourn among men has me bent like
an infant, just as the flame that dispels darkness is itself made dark in an instant.
I have become just as I describe in the following poem:
Destiny has forsaken me, leaving me like
An exhausted pack-camel abandoned in the wastes.
My eighty years have sapped all my strength
So that when I try to stand, I am broken.
I perform my prayers seated, for bowing
If I tried it, would be, for me, impossible.
This condition has warned me
That a journey is coming, and its time is nigh.
The weakness that old age brings keeps me now from serving kings. I no
longer darken their door and rely upon them no more. I have resigned from their
service and have returned what they sent of their favour. For I realize that the
weakness of one so worn has never the duties of service lightly borne. What an
old man can offer, it’s clear, will never be bought by an amir. I have thus taken to
my residence, letting only my obscurity give me precedence.
§ In Praise of Saladin
I used to take such relief at isolation in lands abroad, and sweet separation
from the native sward, hoping that through mere wanderlust, I could settle my
homeland’s bitter dust. I persevered with the patience of a prisoner whose chains
he’d see burst, the control of a man held back from water, dying of thirst.287
Called me to him,288 the message did, an invitation from our lord the Victorious
King, Salah al-Dunya wa’l-Din, Sultan of Islam and the Muslimin! Unifier of the
creed of faith by his light, subjugator of the worshippers of the Cross by his
might, raiser of the banner of justice and right. The reviver of the dynasty of the
Commander of the Faithful, Abu al-Muzaffar Yusuf ibn Ayyub. May God
embellish Islam and the Muslims with his continued fruition, and grant them
victory by the sharpness of his sword and his vision. May He enclose them all in
his shadow’s protective embrace, just as He has purified of filth the sources of
his grace, and extend across the globe his every commanding and forbidding,
lodging his swords in the necks of his foes to do his bidding.
In his mercy [165] he sought me out across the land – a place beyond
mountains, beyond plains I was in, a forsaken corner of the world, having no
kith, no kin. By his good-will, from misfortune’s fangs was I snatched, bearing
me up to his exalted gateway in his grace overflowing, unmatched. The parts of
me Time had broken, he put them in splints to hold, and in his generosity he
found a market for that which others had deemed unsaleable, too old. He
surrounded me with the most wondrous favour, sending me, in his beneficence,
gifts of the sweetest flavour, so much that he recompensed me with his
generosity’s flow for such services as I gave even to others ages ago. Yet still
these he considers and takes into account, as if he had seen and enjoyed them in
equal amount. His gifts, as I sleep, bang on my door, making their way to me
though I am retired, in service no more. Every day I gain something more from
the kindness he gave; he treats me like family though I am his lowliest slave. His
good-will has allowed me from all calamities to survive, and his munificence has
paid back to me what the disasters of Time did deprive. After granting me all
that his duty and example deem fair, his additional trifles are more than my back
can bear. His ampleness left me with no desire to sate, so in prayer for him do I
spend my days, from early to late.
As the mercy by which God brought relief to His servants he stands; as the one
who revived by its blessings our lands. The sultan who restored the example of
the Rightly-Guided (as the first caliphs were called); a new pillar of religion and
state he installed. A source whose waters never dry from all the drinkers, he is a
lake; a bountiful giver who never stops giving, no matter how much they take. In
an impregnable defence are the faithful, thanks to the safety his swords always
bring; by his liberality we flourish as in the green season of spring. The light of
his justice dispels the darkness of the oppressor, and holds back the grasping arm
of the warring transgressor. Through his triumphant governance may we rest in
his protective shade, in a state of continuing joy that follows the path of a joy
already laid – as long as night follows upon day, and the heavenly spheres spin
as they may!
[166] I prayed and the two angels said ‘Amen’,
For the Enthroned One sits close to His caller.
For He has said, may He be exalted, to His servants:
‘Invoke me, for I listen as I do answer.’289
Praise be to God, Lord of Worlds, and may His blessing be upon our lord
Muhammad and all the members of his family. God is enough for us, He is the
best protector.290
PART III CURIOUS TALES: HOLY MEN AND
HEALERS
[169] Section1
§ Introduction
Usama ibn Murshid ibn ‘Ali ibn Muqallad ibn Nasr ibn Munqidh (may God
forgive him, his parents and all the Muslims for their sins) said:
Here are some curious tales, in some of which I figure myself, though some
others were told to me by people I trust. I add them here as an appendix to my
book, since they are not really concerned with the subjects I focused upon in the
preceding pages. I will begin with some tales about holy men, may God be
pleased with them all.
[170] The sheikh and imam Siraj al-Din Ibrahim, the preacher of the city of
Is’ird,3 related to me the following in Dhu al-Qa’da in the year 562 (August–
September 1167) on the authority of Abu al-Faraj al-Baghdadi, who said:
I was in attendance at a meeting led by the sheikh and imam Abu
‘Abdallah Muhammad al-Basri4 in Baghdad, when a woman presented
herself. She said, ‘Master, you were among those who served as a witness
when my dowry was fixed, but I have since lost the dowry-certificate. I ask
you, then, to show me your favour by confirming your testimony before the
court tribunal.’ ‘I won’t do this’, he replied, ‘until you bring me some
sweets.’ The woman just stood there, thinking he was joking, given what he
said. ‘Don’t waste time,’ he said. ‘I won’t go anywhere with you until you
bring me some sweets.’
So, she went away and later returned and took out a paper cornet filled
with dry sweets from a pocket under her wrap. The sheikh’s companions
were amazed at his request for sweets, given his ascetic outlook and
abstinence. He took the cornet and opened it up, tossing aside the sweets one
by one until it was empty. He then examined the paper and what should it be
but the very dowry-certificate that the woman had lost! ‘Take your dowry,’
he said. ‘Here it is!’
Those who were present with him thought this was an extraordinary
occurrence, but he just said, ‘Eat what is lawful,5 and you will do this, and
even more.’
The sheikh Abu al-Qasam al-Khidr ibn Muslim ibn Qasim al-Hamawi told me
the following in Hama [171] on Monday, the last day of Dhu al-Hijja, in the year
570 (21 July 1175). He said, ‘A man from al-Kufa once came to me, a
descendant of the Prophet,6 and related to us on the authority of his father,
saying:
I used to visit the Chief Judge al-Shami al-Hamawi,7 who would receive
me with great generosity and honour. One day he said to me, ‘I love the
people of al-Kufa because of one man among them. I was in Hama as a
young man when ‘Abdallah ibn Maymun al-Hamawi passed away there
(may God have mercy upon him). They had asked him to draw up his last
will, and he said, ‘‘When I am dead and you are preparing my body for
burial, take me out to the desert and have someone climb up the hill that
overlooks the cemetery and call out, ‘‘Abdallah ibn al-Qubays! ‘Abdallah ibn
Maymun is dead! Present yourself and pray over him!’’’ When the man died,
they did what he had told them to do, and a man approached, wearing a robe
of raw cloth and a mantle of wool, coming from the direction towards which
the announcement had been made. He came and prayed over the body while
everyone stood in shock, speechless. When he finished his prayers, he left,
returning whence he came. The people then began complaining to one
another for not having got hold of the man to question him. They ran after
him, but he lost them without ever speaking a word to anyone.’
§ A Similar Tale
I witnessed a similar occurrence in Hisn Kayfa. In the Mosque of al-Khidr
there, there was a man known as Muhammad al-Samma’.8 He had his own
prayer-room adjacent to the mosque and would come out to pray at the time of
communal prayer but then return to his own room. He was one of the saints.9 I
once presented myself before him when he was close to the hour of his death.
He said, ‘I have always wished that God (may He be exalted) would bring
before me my master, Muhammad al-Busti.’10
No sooner had they made the preparations for the washing of his body and the
funeral procession when his master Muhammad al-Busti arrived at his side. He
oversaw the washing of the body and went out behind the body to lead the way
for the procession, and prayed over it.
Later, al-Busti repaired to his pupil’s prayer-room, where he resided for a short
time, during which time he visited me and I him. He was [172] (may God have
mercy upon him) an ascetic of great learning, the likes of whom I have never
seen nor heard. He would practise daily fasting,11 neither drinking any water nor
eating any bread or grains. He would merely break his fast with a couple of
pomegranates or apples or a bunch of grapes. Once or twice a month, he would
take a few small bites of fried meat.
I said to him one day, ‘Sheikh Abu ‘Abdallah, how is it that you neither eat
bread nor drink water and are always fasting?’
‘At first’, he said, ‘I fasted and suffered from the hungerpangs, but then I
found that I could put up with it. I suffered for three days and said to myself,
‘‘I’ll practise it according to the rules about eating dead animals,12 which are
lawful if absolutely necessary after three days of going without food.’’ And I
found that I could put up with that too, so I gave up eating and drinking
altogether. Now my spirit is used to it and does not complain, so I keep doing
what I have been doing.’
One of the great men of Hisn Kayfa had a prayer-room built for the sheikh in a
garden, which he also granted to the sheikh. The sheikh came to me on the first
day of Ramadan and said, ‘I have come to say farewell.’
I said, ‘But what about the prayer-room that has been prepared for you, and the
garden?’
‘My brother,’ he replied, ‘I have no need for either of them. I am not staying.’
And he bade me farewell and set off, may God have mercy upon him. That was
in the year 570 (1175).
§ A Miraculous Messenger
The sheikh Abu al-Qasam al-Khidr ibn Muslim ibn Qasim al-Hamawi related
to me in Hama in the year just mentioned that a man who used to work in a
garden belonging to Muhammad ibn Mis’ar (may God have mercy upon him)
went up to the latter’s family as they sat at the doors of their homes in Ma’arra13
and said, ‘I have just now heard an amazing thing!’ ‘What is it?’ they asked and
he replied:
A stranger passed by me carrying a water-skin and asked me to fill it up
with water. So I gave him his water and he did his ablutions. I offered him
two cucumbers, too, but he refused to take them. I said, ‘Half of this garden
is mine by the right of my labour in it. The other half belongs to Muhammad
ibn Mis’ar by right of ownership.’ At this he asked, ‘Did Muhammad go on
pilgrimage to Mecca this year?’ ‘Yes,’ I replied. ‘Yesterday,’ the stranger
said, [173] ‘after we departed from making the station,14 he died, and we
prayed over his body.’
Muhammad’s family then went out looking for this man to ask him more about
it, but they saw him at such a distance away that they could not catch up with
him. So they returned and made a note of the man’s account – dates included –
and the affair turned out just as the man had said.
The most glorious Shihab al-Din Abu al-Fath al-Muzaffar ibn As’ad ibn
Mas’ud ibn Bakhtakin ibn Sabuktakin,15 the freedman of Mu’izz al-Dawla ibn
Buwayh, related to me in Mosul, on 18 Ramadan of the year 565 (5 June 1170),
the following account:
The Commander of the Faithful al-Muqtafi (may God have mercy upon
him) made a visit to the mosque of Sandudiya, in the vicinity of al-Anbar16
on the western Euphrates, accompanied by his vizier. I was also in
attendance. The caliph entered the mosque, which was known as the Mosque
of the Commander of the Faithful ‘Ali17 (may God be pleased with him),
wearing a Dimyati robe and girded with a sword with an iron hilt.18 No one,
except those who knew him personally, could have known he was the
Commander of the Faithful. Indeed, the caretaker of the mosque began
invoking God’s blessings upon the caliph’s vizier. At this, the vizier said,
‘For shame! You should be invoking blessings on the Commander of the
Faithful!’ At that, al-Muqtafi (may God have mercy upon him) said, ‘Ask
him something useful. Ask him what happened to the disease that afflicted
his face. For I saw him back in the days of our lord al-Mustazhir19 (may God
have mercy upon him), and he had some ailment in his face. He had a
tumour that covered most of his face, so that when he wanted to eat he would
tie it back with a kerchief so that he could get food into his mouth.’20
To this the caretaker replied, ‘It was just as you say. I frequently used to
come to this mosque from al-Anbar. I then met someone who said to me, ‘‘If
you would just visit so-and-so (meaning the governor of al-Anbar) as
frequently as you visit this mosque, then he would surely have called a
physician for you to remove that malady from your face.’’ Something in what
he had said impressed itself upon my soul, something that hardened my
heart. I went to sleep that night [174] and saw the Commander of the Faithful
‘Ali ibn Abi Talib (may God be pleased with him) in a dream. He was in the
mosque. ‘‘What sort of sojourn is this?’’ he said, meaning a sojourn here on
earth. So I complained to him about what was wrong with me and he turned
away from me. But I tried to gain his good-will and complained again,
telling him about what that man had said to me. He replied, ‘‘You are one of
those who desire only the fleeting life.’’21 Then I woke up, and the tumour
had been tossed to one side and my ailment was gone.’
Hearing this, al-Muqtafi (may God have mercy upon him) remarked, ‘He
speaks the truth.’ Then the caliph said to me,22 ‘Talk with him and look into
what he needs. Then draw up a document to that effect and give it to me to
sign.’
So I spoke with the caretaker, who said, ‘I am the head of a family and
responsible for my daughters. I desire three dinars every month.’ I drew up a
statement to this effect, on the top of which my servant wrote:
CARETAKER OF THE MOSQUE OF ‘ALI.
The caliph put his seal on it, acknowledging the request, and said to me,
‘Go and register this in the appropriate bureau.’ So I went without reading
the document except for the imprimatur, ‘Let this be executed.’
Official procedure was to write a copy of the document for the beneficiary
of the statement, and to take from him the original with the signature of the
caliph on it. But when the scribe opened the original document to copy it, he
found underneath the words ‘CARETAKER OF THE MOSQUE OF ‘ALI…’ only the
words ‘… Signed by al-Muqtafi, Commander of the Faithful’ – God’s
blessings be upon him. So if the caretaker had demanded more, it would
have been authorized for him.23
That story is similar to one I heard from Abu ‘Abdallah Muhammad ibn Fatik
the Qur’an-master.28 He said:
One day I was reciting the Qur’an under the tutelage of Ibn Mujahid29 the
Qur’an-master, in Baghdad, when an old man came towards him wearing a
beat-up turban, a head-cloth and robe that was also worn out. Ibn Mujahid
knew the old man and said to him, ‘What’s the story with the little girl?’
The [176] old man replied, ‘Ibn Mujahid, yesterday a third daughter was
born to me. My womenfolk asked me for a daniq to buy some butter and
honey with which to rub her palate,30 but I didn’t have it. As a result, I went
to sleep full of anxiety. But I saw in my dream the Prophet, may God bless
him and grant him peace. He said, ‘‘Don’t be distressed or sad. When you
wake up tomorrow, go in to ‘Ali ibn ‘Isa,31 the caliph’s vizier. Send him my
greetings, and tell him, ‘By the sign that you have prayed for the Prophet at
his tomb four thousand times, pay me one hundred gold dinars.’’’’
At this, Ibn Mujahid said, ‘Abu ‘Abdallah! This is a precious thing!’ and
he interrupted the recital and took the old man by the hand and, rising,
brought him in to ‘Ali ibn ‘Isa. Seeing Ibn Mujahid with an old man he did
not know, ‘Ali ibn ‘Isa asked, ‘Where, Ibn Mujahid, did you get him?’ He
replied, ‘Let the vizier call him to approach and listen to his words.’ So ‘Ali
invited him to approach him and asked, ‘What is your trouble, old man?’
The old man began, ‘As Ibn Mujahid knows, I have two daughters.
Yesterday, a third was born to me. My womenfolk asked me for a daniq with
which to buy some honey and butter to rub the child’s palate, but I didn’t
have it. So I went to sleep last night full of worries. But I saw the Prophet,
God’s blessing and peace be upon him, in a dream, and he said, ‘‘Don’t be
distressed or sad. When you wake up tomorrow, go in to ‘Ali ibn ‘Isa. Send
him my greetings, and tell him, ‘By the sign that you have prayed for the
Prophet at his tomb four thousand times, pay me one hundred gold dinars.’’’’
At this, Ibn Mujahid said to me, ‘Abu ‘Abdallah, Tears flowed and poured
from the eyes of ‘Ali ibn ‘Isa. Then the latter said, ‘‘God and His Messenger
have spoken the truth, and so have you spoken, my good man. This is a thing
that no one besides God (may He be exalted) and His Messenger (may God
bless him and grant him peace) could know. Attendant! Bring the money-
bag.’’ The attendant went and brought the bag before him. ‘Ali thrust his
hand in and pulled out one hundred dinars, saying, ‘‘Here are the hundred
dinars, which the [177] Messenger of God (may God bless him and grant
him peace) spoke of to you. And here are another hundred for the good
tidings you bring. And here are another hundred just as a gift from us to
you.’’ And so the old man departed, with three hundred dinars in his sleeve.’
The Commander al-Hajj Abu ‘Ali related to me in Ramadan of the year 568
(April-May 1173) at Hisn Kayfa the following:
I was in Mosul sitting in the shop of Muhammad ibn ‘Ali ibn Muhammad
ibn Mama when a fuqqa’-vendor32 with a stocky body and thick legs passed
by. So Muhammad called to him, ‘By God, ‘Abd ‘Ali, tell him your story,’
indicating yours truly.
The man said, ‘As you can see,33 I am a fuqqa’-vendor. One Tuesday
night, I went to sleep healthy, but when I woke up it was as if I had become
unhitched at the middle. I was unable to move and my legs dried up and
became so thin that they were all skin and bones. I had to drag my feet
behind me because my legs wouldn’t follow along with me, and I couldn’t
get any movement out of them at all. So I sat down in the path of Zayn al-
Din ‘Ali Kujak34 (may God have mercy upon him). He ordered that I be
carried to his residence, and so I was.
‘Zayn al-Din summoned some physicians and told them, ‘‘I would like
you to heal this person.” ‘‘We shall certainly heal him, God willing,’’ they
said. They then took a nail and heated it red hot and cauterized my leg with
it, but I didn’t feel a thing. ‘‘We’re not able to heal this man,’’ they told Zayn
al-Din. ‘‘There’s nothing we can do about it.’’ So Zayn al-Din gave me two
dinars and a donkey. The donkey remained with me for about a month, but
then died. So I went back and sat down in the path of Zayn al-Din again, and
he gave me another donkey, which also died. He gave me yet a third donkey,
and it died, too.
‘So I asked him for help yet again, but he just said to one of his
companions, ‘‘Remove this man and throw him in the ditch.’’ And so I
begged his companion, ‘‘By God, throw me in on my hip so that I don’t feel
anything when it happens!’’ To this he replied, [178] ‘‘The only way I’ll
throw you is on your head!’’ But after this a messenger of Zayn al-Din’s
(may God have mercy upon him) came to me and brought me back to him,
for what he had said about throwing me into the ditch was just a joke. Once I
was presented before him, he granted me four dinars and a donkey.
‘My condition remained as it was until one night when I saw in a dream a
man standing by me. ‘‘Arise!’’ he said. ‘‘Who are you?’’ I asked him. ‘‘I am
‘Ali ibn Abi Talib,’’ he replied. And so I awoke and stood up. I woke my
wife and said, ‘‘You won’t believe it! I’ve just had a vision,’’ and described
it. ‘‘Hey! You’re standing up!’’ she exclaimed.
‘So I walked on my feet, my trouble gone, and returned to the condition
that you see me in now. I went before Zayn al-Din, the amir ‘Ali Kujak (may
God have mercy upon him) and told him the story of my dream and he could
see that the ailment that he had seen me with had now gone, so he granted
me ten dinars.’
Glory be to the Healer, the Restorer of Health!
[181] The amir Sayf al-Dawla Zanki ibn Qaraja (may God have mercy upon
him) related to me the following incident. He said:
So, Shahanshah (he’s the husband of Zanki’s sister) invited us to come to
Aleppo. Once we gathered together at his place, we sent word to a
companion of ours whom we like to spend time with and have drinking-
sessions. He was a real sweetheart and made good company, so we invited
him to come along. When he showed up, we offered him a drink, but he said,
‘I’m under strict orders not to drink. My physician has ordered me to fast for
a few days until this boil splits open.’ He had this huge boil on the back of
his neck. But we just told him, ‘Come on and join us today, and you can start
fasting tomorrow.’ So he did, and he drank with us all day. Eventually, we
asked Shahanshah for something to eat. ‘I haven’t got anything,’ he said. So
we harassed him until he finally agreed to bring us some eggs to fry up on
the brazier. He had the eggs brought out along with a plate, and we cracked
the eggs and poured them out onto the plate and put the frying-pan on the
brazier to get all hot. But I gestured to our man with the boil on his neck, and
he lifted the plate up to his mouth to drink a bit of it and he totally poured the
whole plate-load down his throat! So then we said to the master of the house,
‘Let’s have some compensation for those eggs!’ But he replied, ‘By God, I
won’t do it.’ So we just drank some more and went our separate ways.
I was actually still in bed at dawn when somebody knocked on my door. A
serving-girl went out to see who was there, and – guess what? – there was
that friend of ours. ‘Let him in,’ I said. So he came over to me while I was
still in my bed and said, ‘My lord, that boil that was on my neck has
disappeared without a trace!’ I checked the spot, and, sure enough, it looked
just like any other part of his neck. ‘What got rid of it?’ I asked. ‘It was God,
glory be to Him!’ he replied. ‘As far as I know, I didn’t use anything I didn’t
[182] use before, unless it was drinking those raw eggs.’
Glory be to the Almighty, the Afflicter, the Healer!
We had with us at Shayzar two brothers from Kafartab, the oldest named
Muzaffar, the other Malik ibn ‘Ayyad. As merchants, they both travelled to
Baghdad and other lands. Muzaffar was afflicted with a terrible hernia, which
tired him out. Once, while he was part of a caravan crossing the Syrian Desert to
Baghdad, the caravan encamped with one of the nomadic Arab tribes, who
treated them with hospitality and cooked some fowl for them. They had their
supper and then went to sleep. But then Muzaffar woke up and awakened his
travelling companion, who was next to him, saying, ‘Am I asleep or awake?’
‘Awake,’ he reasoned. ‘If you were asleep, you wouldn’t be talking.’
Muzaffar said, ‘My hernia has disappeared without leaving any trace.’ His
companion examined him and, sure enough, he had returned to a state of health
such as anyone else enjoys.
When they woke up the next morning, they asked the Arab tribesmen who had
received them as guests what it was that they had fed them.
They said, ‘You encamped among us while our animals were out to pasture, so
we just went out and captured some young ravens and cooked them up for you.’
When the caravan reached Baghdad, they went to the hospital and told
Muzaffar’s story to the director of the hospital. The director sent word and
obtained some young ravens and fed them to whomever was afflicted with this
same malady, but it was of no benefit and had no effect whatsoever.
‘This raven that he ate,’ the director surmised, ‘its father must have bill-fed it
some vipers, and for that reason it did the man some good.’
[183] There was a case similar to that one. A man once went to Yuhanna ibn
Butlan the physician, who was famed for his knowledge, wisdom and
prominence in the field of medicine. This was when Ibn Butlan had his clinic in
Aleppo.41 The man complained to Ibn Butlan about his ailment and the physician
could see that he was stricken by dropsy – his stomach was enlarged, his neck
emaciated and his whole appearance changed. So he said to the man, ‘By God,
my boy, I haven’t got anything to help you, and medicine will no longer be of
any use.’ So the man left.
After a while, the man passed by again while Ibn Butlan was in his clinic, and
his ailment had entirely left him, his abdomen had shrunk back and his condition
was improved. So Ibn Butlan called to him and said, ‘Aren’t you the one who
came to see me a while ago with a case of dropsy, with an enlarged stomach and
emaciated neck, and I told you, ‘‘I haven’t got anything to help you’’?’
‘I am indeed,’ he replied.
‘With what have you been treated such that your ailment has left you?’ ‘the
physician asked.
‘By God,’ he responded, ‘I haven’t been treated with anything. I’m but a poor
beggar, without any possessions or anyone to look after me other than my
mother, an old and feeble woman. She had two casks full of vinegar which she
used to feed to me every day with bread.’
Ibn Butlan asked him, ‘Is there anything left of this vinegar?’
‘Yes,’ the man said.
‘Then take me and show me the cask that has the vinegar in it,’ the physician
said.
The man led him to his house and showed him the cask of vinegar. Ibn Butlan
emptied out the vinegar that was inside, and discovered two vipers at the bottom
that had decomposed. So he said to the man, ‘My boy, no one could have treated
you with vinegar containing two vipers to the point that you would have
recovered – except for God, the Mighty, the Majestic.’
[184] This Ibn Butlan had an amazing propensity for accurate diagnosis. Here
is an example. A man once came to him while he was in his clinic in Aleppo.
The man had lost his ability to speak and was barely intelligible when he spoke.
‘What is your trade?’ Ibn Butlan asked the man.
‘I am a sifter,’ he replied.
‘Bring me half a ratl of sharp vinegar,’ the physician said, and it was brought
to him. ‘Drink!’ he said to the man.
So the man drank it and sat down for a moment until he was overcome with
nausea. He then started vomiting large amounts of clay mixed in with all that
vinegar. As a result, his throat opened up and his speech became unimpaired.
Ibn Butlan thereupon said to his son and his pupils, ‘Don’t treat just anyone
with this remedy, as it will kill him. In this case, a layer of dirt from the sifting-
dust had been deposited along the oesophagus, and nothing could clear it out
except vinegar.’
Ibn Butlan used to be attached to the service of my great-grandfather, Abu al-
Mutawwaj Muqallad. It happened that my grandfather, Sadid al-Mulk ‘Ali (may
God have mercy upon him), developed a white patch of skin when he was just a
little boy. His father became anxious about it, fearing it might be leprosy. So he
summoned Ibn Butlan and said to him, ‘Have a look at what has appeared on
‘Ali’s body.’
So Ibn Butlan examined him and said, ‘I’ll need five hundred dinars to treat
him and make this malady leave him.’
‘If you had treated ‘Ali, I would not have considered it fair to you to pay only
five hundred dinars,’ replied my great-grandfather.
When he saw that my great-grandfather was angry, Ibn Butlan said, ‘My lord, I
am your servant and slave, existing by your bounty. What I said, I said only by
way of a jest. The ailment afflicting ‘Ali is just a skin-irritation that affects the
young. When he reaches adolescence, it will pass. So don’t be worried about it
and don’t let anyone tell you ‘‘I’ll treat him if you pay me money’’. For all this
will clear up when he matures.’
And it turned out just as he had said.
There was in Aleppo a woman, one of the notable women of Aleppo, called
Barra. She caught a bad head-cold. She used to fashion for her head some old
cotton, a tall pointed cap, some velvet and some pieces of cloth [185] so that she
looked like she had a gigantic turban on her head, and she would still beg for
relief from her cold. So she summoned Ibn Butlan and complained to him of her
malady.
He said to her, ‘Tomorrow, obtain for me fifty mithqals of strong-smelling
camphor, either purchased or rented from one of the perfumers, with the
understanding that it will be returned intact.’
And so she obtained the camphor for him. The next morning, Ibn Butlan pulled
off everything she had on her head, laced her hair with the camphor and returned
all the wraps she had had on her head. All the while she was begging for relief
from her cold. She then went to sleep for a short while and woke up complaining
of the heat and the weight on her head. So Ibn Butlan began removing one piece
after another from her head until only one veil was left. Then he shook that
camphor from her hair and her cold left her. Afterwards, she would go about
covered in one veil only.
§ Introduction
§ Usama’s Father
[192] As for my hunting at Shayzar, it was done with my father (may God
have mercy upon him), who had a great passion for the hunt and all varieties of
birds of prey, always talking about it, and, on account of his delight in it, he
never considered what he spent on it to be too much. It was his favoured
pastime, for, once he had finished attending to the needs of his companions, he
had no other thing to occupy him besides warfare, jihad against the Franks and
copying the Book of God (the Mighty, the Majestic). He (may God have mercy
upon him) fasted every day and kept up his practice of reciting the Qur’an. For
him, the hunt was as it is described in the old saying, ‘Air out your heart, and it
will better retain the remembrance of God.’ I have truly never seen anything like
his hunting and his ability to organize it.
I have observed the hunt with the King of Amirs, the atabeg Zangi (may God
have mercy upon him), who had a large number of birds of prey. I would see
him, as we proceeded along the river-banks, preceded by the austringers, who
would cast off3 the goshawks at the waterfowl. The drums would be beaten
following the usual custom and the hawks would hunt down what they could
hunt, and miss what they missed. Behind them were the ‘mountain’ peregrines
on the falconers’ fists. Once the goshawks had done their hunting (successful or
not), they slipped the peregrines on those birds which had managed to fly far
away, making a ‘desert run’,4 and they would take them and make a kill. They
are also slipped on partridge, taking them and making their kill as the birds take
off at the base of the mountain. For peregrines are characterized by a truly
marvellous swiftness of flight.5
One day I observed Zangi while we were in the water-gorged plain in the
environs of Mosul. We were crossing through eggplant fields. In front of the
atabeg was an austringer with a female sparrow-hawk6 on his fist. A male
francolin took to the air, so the austringer slipped the sparrow-hawk on it, [193]
and it took the francolin and came down to earth. Once it reached the ground, the
francolin escaped from its grasp and once again took to the air. When the
francolin had got high up in the air, the hawk took off again and seized it and
came back down to earth, clasping its quarry firmly.
I have also seen the atabeg many times engaged in hunting wild game. Once
the hunting-party had drawn up in a circle, with the beasts corralled inside the
circle, then no one could enter it. As soon as any of the beasts tried to leave the
circle, we shot arrows at it. The atabeg was himself one of the best archers there.
Whenever a gazelle would draw near, he would shoot it, but it looked to us as if
it had merely stumbled. Then it would fall to the ground and be slaughtered.
When I was with him, on every hunting expedition I attended, he would send the
first gazelle he killed to me with one of his attendants.
I was present once when the circle had been formed while we were in the
region of Nisibis7 on the banks of the Hirmas. They had already pitched our tents
and the beasts came right up to our tents. The attendants came out with staves
and poles and struck down quite a few of them. A wolf, corralled inside the
circle, pounced upon a gazelle in the middle of the circle and, having caught it,
crouched down upon it. It was killed while it sat upon its prey.
I was also with the atabeg one day while we were in Sinjar.8 One of his
companions, a horseman, came and told him, ‘There’s a hyena bitch over here,
sleeping!’ So the atabeg started off, and we with him, to a valley there where the
hyena was asleep on a rock on one side of the valley. The atabeg dismounted and
walked up to the hyena until he stood facing it. He then shot it with an arrow,
which knocked the hyena down to the floor of the valley. His followers climbed
down and brought it before him, dead.
I also saw the atabeg in the environs of Sinjar when his party had roused a hare
from its form. He gave orders and the cavalry made a circuit around the hare. He
then called for an attendant, who carried a caracal9 along behind him in the way
one carries a cheetah. The attendant came forward and slipped the caracal on to
the hare, which jumped in among the legs of the horses and so was unable to be
caught. Before that, I had never seen a caracal used in a hunt.
§ Hunting in Egypt
I have also seen hunting in Egypt. Al-Hafiz (may God have mercy upon him)
had many birds of prey: goshawks, sakers and ‘overseas’ peregrines.10 These
were all cared for by a master-falconer, who would take them out two days a
week, most of them just on the fists of the falconers, who walked on foot. On the
day they went out to hunt, I used to ride out to enjoy the sight of them hunting.
As a result, the master-falconer went to al-Hafiz and told him, ‘Your guest
(calling me by name) goes out when we do,’ saying this to seek his opinion
about it.
Al-Hafiz replied, ‘Go out with him and let him enjoy the sight of the birds.’
[195] So we went out one day and one of the austringers was carrying an
intermewed goshawk with red irises.11 We saw some crane, so the master-
falconer said to the austringer, ‘Go up ahead and cast off on them the goshawk
with the red irises.’
So he went forward and cast off the hawk on the crane, which took to flight.
The goshawk intercepted one of them in mid-air some distance away from us
and brought it down. I said to one of my attendants who was riding a
thoroughbred mount, ‘Push forward to the goshawk, dismount and shove the
crane’s bill into the ground. Hold it down that way and keep its legs under yours
until we can get to you.’
So he went and did as I had told him. The austringer then arrived and
slaughtered the crane and then gorged12 the goshawk.
When the master-falconer returned, he told al-Hafiz what had happened and
what I had said to my attendant, adding, ‘My lord, he talks the talk of a true
huntsman.’
At this, al-Hafiz remarked, ‘What business does this fellow have besides
fighting and hunting?’
They also had some sakers that they would slip against grey heron,13 while the
latter were in flight. When the heron sees the saker, it climbs up in a spiral. The
saker then does the same, a little apart, until it climbs up higher than the heron.
Then it stoops14 on the heron and takes it.
In that land there are birds which they call al-bujj, similar to the flamingo,15
which they also hunt. The waterfowl are easy to hunt in the canals cut from the
Nile. They have very few gazelles but there is in that land the ‘cow of the
Children of Israel’.16 These are yellow cows with horns like the horns of normal
cows. However, they are smaller than normal cows and can run at an incredible
pace.
They also have an animal that comes from the Nile that they call the ‘river-
horse’, which is like a small cow and has little eyes. [196] It is hairless, like a
water-buffalo. In its lower jaw, it has long fangs, while in its upper jaw it has
holes through which the points of its fangs can issue just below its eyes. It makes
noises like the noises of a pig and is always to be found in a pool of water. It eats
bread, grass and barley.17
I had gone with the amir Mu’in al-Din (may God have mercy upon him) to
Acre to visit the king of the Franks, Fulk, son of Fulk. We saw there a Genoese
man who had just arrived from the land of the Franks and who brought with him
a large intermewed goshawk that hunted crane. He also had a small bitch with
him, which, when he cast off the goshawk at crane, would run below. When the
hawk made its kill and came down to earth, the bitch took the crane in her mouth
and it was unable to escape from her. The Genoese man said to us, ‘In our
country, if the goshawk has thirteen feathers in its tail, then it can hunt crane.’
We counted the tail-feathers18 of that goshawk, and it was just so.
The amir Mu’in al-Din (may God have mercy upon him) asked the king to
give him that hawk, so he took it from the Genoese, along with the bitch, and
gave it to the amir, and it came back with us. On our way, I saw the hawk pounce
on gazelle as if it were pouncing on pieces of meat. We arrived with it in
Damascus, but its life there was not long, and it did not hunt anything before it
died.
I have also seen hunting at Hisn Kayfa with the amir Qara Arslan [197] (may
God have mercy upon him). In that region, there are many partridges and see-
sees19 as well as francolins. As for the waterfowl, they inhabit the river-bank,
which is a wide open space, and so goshawks are unable to catch them. Most of
their quarry are mountain goats, male or female. They make nets for them that
they spread in the valleys. They then drive the mountain goats into them so that
they are trapped. These mountain goats abound in their region and are very
convenient to hunt. The hares are like that too.
I also saw some hunting with Nur al-Din (may God have mercy upon him). I
was in his company while we were in the territory of Hama, when the men
roused a hare. Nur al-Din shot a chisel-headed arrow at it, but the hare just leapt
up and beat us to its burrow and went in. We all galloped after it, and Nur al-Din
stood waiting for it. Meanwhile, the Sharif al-Sayyid Baha’ al-Din (may God
have mercy upon him) passed the hare’s leg to me, which the arrow had cut off
above the tendon. The point of the arrowhead had sliced through its abdomen,
causing the hare’s uterus to slip out. Yet after all that, it beat us all and went into
its burrow. Nur al-Din gave the order to one of his bodyguards, who went down,
took off his sandals and went in after the hare, but he could not get to it. I said to
the man who had the hare’s uterus – which still had two leverets in it – ‘Cut it
open and cover the leverets in soil.’ And so he did, and the animals kept moving
and lived.
I was in Nur al-Din’s presence another day, when he had slipped a bitch on a
fox while we were in the environs of Qara Hisar, in the territory of Aleppo. He
and I both galloped along behind the bitch, which caught up with the fox and
grabbed the fox’s tail. The fox then turned its head backwards and clamped
down on the bitch’s snout. The bitch began yelping while Nur al-Din (may God
have mercy upon him) just laughed. Then the fox let go and slid into its earth
and we were unable to catch it.
[198] One day, as we were riding beneath the citadel of Aleppo to the north of
the city, Nur al-Din was presented with a goshawk. So he said to the amir Najm
al-Din20 (may God have mercy upon him), ‘Go tell so-and-so (meaning me) to
take this hawk and amuse himself with it.’
So Najm al-Din told me, and I replied, ‘I don’t know how.’
At this, Nur al-Din said, ‘You, who are always engaged in hunting, don’t know
how to train a goshawk?!’
‘My lord,’ I responded, ‘we don’t do our training ourselves. We have
austringers and attendants who do that and who go ahead of us with them to
hunt.’ I did not take the hawk.
§ An Exceptional Cheetah
My father also had a female cheetah that was to other cheetahs like al-
Yahshur was to other hawks. [207] They captured this cheetah when it was still
wild, one of the largest cheetahs ever. The cheetah-keeper took it, put a ring in
its nose and trained it. It was content to ride out,33 but would not hunt. It would
also have fits just like a madman would be taken by fits, frothing at the mouth.
When a young deer was presented to it, it would not seek the game out nor show
any interest except to sniff at it and mouth it. It went on like this for a long time,
close to a year.
But one day we went out to the cane-brakes. The horsemen went in while I
stood at the mouth of the cane-brakes, with the cheetah-keeper and the cheetah
near me. A gazelle sprang up and came out towards me. I urged on the horse I
was riding, a real thoroughbred, wishing to drive the gazelle back in the
direction of the cheetah. But the horse was too quick for the gazelle and struck it
in the chest, throwing it to the ground. The cheetah suddenly sprang upon it and
caught it, as if it had been sleeping, had woken up and said, ‘Take what game
you wish!’ It caught any gazelle that showed itself. Its keeper was unable to
control it and it would drag him along, throwing him down. It did not stop as
cheetahs usually do when hunting. On the contrary, every time the keeper said,
‘It’s stopped!’ it would run off again and take a gazelle.
We used to hunt idmi34 gazelle in Shayzar, which is a large variety of gazelle.
Whenever we took this cheetah out to al-’Ala and the lands to the east where
there are white gazelles,35 we would not let the cheetah-keeper run with it, so
that it was not able to drag him along and throw him down. It would attack
gazelles as if they appeared to be young ones because of the small size of the
white gazelle.
This cheetah alone of all the other cheetahs was allowed in the home of my
father (may God have mercy upon him). He had a special serving-girl who
tended it. On one side of the courtyard, the cheetah had a folded-up blanket with
dry grass underneath, and in the wall a metal spike had been driven. The
cheetah-keeper would come in with it from the hunt and put it down at the
entrance of the courtyard where it took its rest. The cheetah would then walk
into the courtyard to the spot all made up for it, and it would go to sleep there.
Then the serving-girl would come and chain it to the spike in the wall. Yet, by
God, in that same house there were some twenty idmi and white gazelles, rams,
goats and fawns [208] that had been born there. Yet the cheetah would neither
seek them out nor frighten them. It would never stir from its place. Left by itself,
it would just enter the courtyard without even turning to look at the gazelles.
I observed the serving-girl currying the cheetah’s coat with a comb, and the
cheetah never resisted or tried to get away. One day after the cheetah had
urinated on that blanket that was made up for it, I saw the serving-girl shake the
cheetah and strike it for urinating on the blanket, and the cheetah never growled
or struck back.
On another day, I saw the cheetah when two hares were started right before the
cheetah-keeper. It caught up with one and grabbed it, biting it with its fangs. It
then pursued the other one and, having caught up with it, began to maul it with
its front paws, while its mouth was busy with the first hare. After giving it a few
blows with its paws, the cheetah dropped it and the hare leapt away.
One of those who joined us on the hunt was the learned sheikh Abu ‘Abdallah
al-Tulaytuli,36 the grammarian (may God have mercy upon him). In the field of
grammar he was the Sibawayh of his age.37 I studied grammar under him for
close on ten years. Prior to that, he was director of the House of Learning in
Tripoli.38When the Franks captured Tripoli, my father and uncle (may God have
mercy upon them both) sent a messenger and redeemed this sheikh Abu
‘Abdallah, and Yanis, the copyist.39 The latter was a member of that generation
of calligraphers that was not too far removed from those of the school of Ibn al-
Bawwab.40 He stayed with us in Shayzar for a period of time and copied for my
father (may God have mercy upon him) two complete texts of the Qur’an. Then
he moved to Egypt and died there.
I witnessed a wonderful thing with regard to the sheikh Abu ‘Abdallah. One
day I entered his room in order to study with him [209] and I found piled before
him many books of grammar: The Book of Sibawayh, The Peculiarities of
Speech by Ibn Jinni, The Explanation by Abu ‘Ali al-Farisi, the Salient Features
and the Sentences.41 So I said to him, ‘Master Abu ‘Abdallah, have you read all
of these books?’
‘Read them?’ he replied. ‘Not just that! By God, I have written them all out on
tablets and memorized them by heart. Do you want me to prove it to you? Take a
volume, open it up and read out the first line from the top of the page.’
So I took up a volume, opened it and read out a line. He then recited the entire
page from memory, and he could do the same with all those volumes. And so I
saw in him a great phenomenon, beyond all human capacity.
This was just a parenthetical statement that has no real place in the course of
this particular narrative.
The sheikh had joined us on the hunt with that cheetah, he on horseback with
his feet covered in sores,42for the ground had many thistles, which had pricked at
his feet and made them bleed. But he was absorbed watching the cheetah hunt
and so he never felt the pain in his legs – preoccupied by watching the cheetah
creep slowly towards the gazelles, jump after them and catch them.
My father (may God have mercy upon him) was fortunate enough to have
some rare and clever birds of prey. This was because he had so many of them
that he could choose from them the most sharp-set43 and clever. One year, he had
an intermewed goshawk with red eyes, which was one of the smartest hawks.
Now, a letter arrived from Egypt from my uncle Taj al-Umara’ Muqallad (may
God have mercy upon him) – he had gone to live there in the service of al-
Amir.44It said, ‘In the audience-chamber of al-Afdal45 [210] I heard someone
mention the red-eyed hawk, and al-Afdal questioned the speaker about it and
how it hunts.’
So my father (may God have mercy upon him) sent the hawk with an
austringer to al-Afdal. When the austringer was admitted into al-Afdal’s
presence, the latter asked him, ‘Is this the hawk with the red eyes?’
‘Yes, my lord,’ he replied.
‘And what does it hunt?’ asked al-Afdal.
‘It hunts quail, argala and other kinds of game in between,’ the austringer
informed him.
And so that hawk remained in Egypt for a while, then it escaped and
disappeared, staying for a year in the desert among the sycamore trees, where it
moulted. Then they went back and captured it. A letter later came from my uncle
(may God have mercy upon him) saying, ‘The red-eyed hawk got lost and
moulted amidst the sycamores, but they went back and captured it and use it for
hunting. A great calamity is once again loosed upon the birds!’
One day we were with my father (may God have mercy upon him) after one of
the peasants of Ma’arrat al-Nu’man had come to him, bringing with him an
intermewed goshawk, the size of a large eagle, whose wing- and tail-feathers
were damaged. I had never seen such a hawk before.
The peasant said, ‘My lord, I was setting up a snare for wood-pigeons46 when
this goshawk struck at a pigeon that was caught in the snare. I captured the hawk
and have brought it to you.’
My father took it and gave generously to the man who had presented it. The
austringer imped its feathers, brought it to the hunt and tried to train it. But the
hawk was already an accustomed hunter that had moulted in the mews and had
escaped from the Franks. It moulted again on the mountain of al-Ma’arra. It
proved to be the most sharp-set and cleverest of my father’s birds of prey.
One day I witnessed the chase with my father (may God have mercy upon
him) when a man came up to us from a distance, carrying something that we
could not at first recognize. When he came close, it turned out to be a passager
peregrine, of the largest and best kind. The bird had clawed his hand as he
carried it, so he had let it hang, holding it by the jesses47 and feet. The peregrine
was thus hanging upside-down with wings outstretched.
When we arrived, he said, ‘My lord, I caught this bird and have brought it for
you.’
My father handed it over to the falconer, who treated it and imped all its
broken feathers. But its bark proved to be worse than [211] its bite – the trapper
had damaged it by what he had done to it. For the peregrine is a balance, which
even the least thing will spoil or destroy.
This falconer had great skill in the handling of peregrines.48 We used to go out
on the chase, leaving from the city-gates, taking with us all manner of hunting-
gear, even nets, hatchets, shovels and hooks for whatever game went to earth.
We would also take hunting-animals – hawks, sakers, peregrines, cheetahs and
hounds. Once we had left the town, the falconer would let two peregrines circle
around, and they would continue to circle above the hunting-party. If one of
them should strike out on its own, the falconer would merely cough and point
with his hand in the direction in which he wanted the falcon to go. And, by God,
the peregrine would instantly turn back in that direction.
I once saw that falconer get a peregrine to wait on49 over a flock of pigeons
that had come down in a meadow. When it had found its pitch, the drum was
beaten to flush the pigeons. Out they flew and the peregrine stooped on them. It
struck the head of one, cutting it off. It bound to the pigeon and descended to the
ground. By God, we really turned the place over looking for that head, but we
never found it. All indications were that it fell at some distance into the water,
for we were close to the river.
One day, an attendant called Ahmad ibn Mujir – and this attendant was not
among those who rode out with us on the chase – said to my father, ‘My lord, I
am very eager to see a hunt.’
My father told someone, ‘Offer Ahmad a horse that he can ride out hunting
with us.’
And so out we went to hunt francolin. A male francolin took to the air,
fluttering its wings as is its habit. My father (may God have mercy upon him)
had al-Yahshur on his wrist, so he cast it off on the francolin. Al-Yahshur flew
close along the ground, the earth and grass striking its chest as it flew.
Meanwhile, the francolin had risen to a great height. At this, Ahmad said to my
father, ‘By your life, my lord, he is just toying with the francolin in order to
catch him!’
§ Hunting-Dogs
[212] Zaghari-dogs would also be sent to my father from the lands of the
Romans, good thoroughbreds, both hounds and bitches. They bred while in our
possession, and the hunting of birds was instinctive to them. I saw a small bitch
pup that went out following the hounds under the control of the houndsman. He
slipped a goshawk after a francolin, which took cover in some long grass on the
bank of the river. They loosed the hounds into the long grass to flush the
francolin while this pup stood on the bank. When the francolin took to the air,
the puppy leapt after it from the bank and fell into the river, despite the fact that
she had no experience of hunting and had never hunted at all.
I once saw one of these zagharis when a partridge had taken cover in the
mountains in an impenetrable thicket. That hound went right in but then seemed
to be taking some time to come out. Then we heard a commotion from deep
inside the thicket.
My father (may God have mercy upon him) said, ‘There’s a wild animal inside
that thicket that’s killed the hound!’
But then, after a while, the hound came out, pulling a jackal by the leg. The
jackal had been in the thicket too, but the hound had killed it and was dragging it
out to us.
My father (may God have mercy upon him) once travelled to Isfahan,50 to the
palace of the sultan Malikshah (may God have mercy upon him). He told me the
following about it:
When I had finished my business [213] with the sultan and wished to
travel, I wanted to take with me some hunting-bird with which I might
entertain myself while on the road. So they brought me some hawks and a
weasel51that was trained to flush birds out of thickets. However, I chose a
saker that hunts hare and bustard,52 for I thought it would be difficult to
handle goshawks on that long and difficult route.
My father (may God have mercy upon him) had salukis – hounds of the finest
breeding. One day he slipped his sakers on a gazelle while the ground, swamped
by rain, was heavy with mud. I, still a youngster, was with him on one of my
nags. The horses of the rest of the hunting-party could not run in the mud, while
my nag managed to overcome it because of my light weight. The sakers and the
hounds had got the gazelle down, so my father said to me, ‘Usama, get over to
the gazelle, dismount and hold on to its hind legs until we get there.’ I did this
and my father arrived on the scene and slaughtered the gazelle. He had standing
with him a fawn bitch of good breeding called Hamawiya, which had brought
down the gazelle. All of a sudden, the herd of gazelles that we had already been
hunting returned, passing by us. My father seized Hamawiya’s collar and set off
running with her until she sighted the gazelles. He then slipped her at them and
she took another gazelle.
Despite his heavy body and his old age and the fact that he was always fasting,
my father (may God have mercy upon him) rode at a gallop all day long. He
would never go on the hunt except upon a thoroughbred or a fine pack-horse.
We, his four sons, would accompany him and get all worn out and tired, while he
would never weaken or get tired and worn out. Nor could any servant, equerry or
weapons-bearer fall behind in the chase after game.
I had an attendant named Yusuf who carried my spear and my shield and led
my extra horse, but who did not join the chase or follow along. So my father
upbraided him for it, time and again.
Eventually, the attendant said to him, ‘My lord, not one of the men present
with you is as much help to you as this your son (and I seek refuge in God if it is
not so). Let me then remain behind with his other horse and weapons. If you
should ever need him, you will find him. Do not consider me part of the hunting-
party at all.’
My father never once blamed him again or disapproved of his not chasing after
the game.
§ The Hunt Must Go On
[214] The lord of Antioch once camped against us and we went to battle. But
then he left without negotiating any truce. Even though the Frankish rearguard
had not yet gone very far from the town, my father (may God have mercy upon
him) had already ridden out to go hunting. When he had gone some way from
town, the Franks turned back upon our own horsemen who had gone in their
pursuit. The Franks eventually arrived outside the town. In the meantime, my
father climbed up Tall Sikkin53 to observe them as they stood between him and
the town. He remained in his position on top of that hill until they withdrew from
the town. He then returned to the hunt.
My father (may God have mercy upon him) used to pursue roe-deer in the
land around the Bridge Fortress. On one particular day, he must have bagged five
or six of them while on a black horse of his called ‘Khurji’s horse’54 after the
name of its owner, who sold it to my father. He bought it from him for 320
dinars. Anyway, as he was chasing the last of the roes, the front leg of the horse
went into a pit that had been dug to catch wild boar and so the horse tumbled on
top of him and broke my father’s collar-bone. Then the horse stood back up and
galloped along for another twenty cubits or so, while my father was still flat on
the ground. But then the horse returned and stood by his head neighing and
whickering until he stood up and his attendants came and helped him to remount.
This is how an Arab horse behaves.
Now, I went out with my father (may God have mercy upon him) towards the
mountain to hunt partridge. An attendant of his, named Lu’lu’ (may God have
mercy upon him), was riding a common hackney. This attendant started
dismounting in order to attend to some errand of his own while it was still early
in the morning and we were close to town. But when his hackney saw the
shadow of his quiver, it became startled and threw him down, and ran off loose.
So I, by God, galloped after it, along with an attendant of mine; we tried to catch
it from early that morning until late in the afternoon until finally [215] we drove
it to take refuge with a herd of animals pasturing in one of the cane-brakes. The
herdsmen went and stretched out a rope for the hackney and captured it just like
one captures a wild beast. So then I took it and returned. In the meantime, my
father (may God have mercy upon him) was standing outside town waiting for
me – he neither went hunting nor went to rest in his house. Thus, hackneys are
more like wild beasts than horses.
My father (may God have mercy upon him) told me the following story:
I used to go out hunting accompanied by chief Abu Turab Haydara ibn
Qatramir – may God have mercy upon him (he was his sheikh, under whom
he memorized the Qur’an and studied Arabic55). When we arrived at the
hunting-grounds, Abu Turab would dismount and sit on a rock and recite the
Qur’an while we did our hunting around him. Once we finished with the
hunt, he would mount up and ride with us. One day he told me the following:
‘Sir, as I was sitting on a rock a partridge suddenly came trotting up,
exhausted, towards the very rock upon which I was sitting. It slipped under
cover of the rock just as a goshawk came in hot pursuit, though it was still a
way off. The hawk now descended across from me while Lu’lu’ was
shouting, ‘‘Your eyes, your eyes,56 master!’’ He then came galloping up,
while I was saying, ‘‘O God, protect the partridge!’’ Lu’lu’ then said to me,
‘‘Master, where is the partridge?’’ I replied, ‘‘I didn’t see a thing. It didn’t
come through here.’’ But then he dismounted from his horse and walked
around the rock and, looking underneath it, he saw the partridge and said, ‘‘I
say the partridge is here, yet you say it isn’t!’’ Then he took the partridge
and… dear sir… he broke its legs and threw it to the hawk even as my heart
was breaking into pieces because of it.’
§ Amazing Bird-Stories
Another amazing occurrence while hunting with goshawks was the following.
I had gone out hunting with my father (may God have mercy upon him), right
after a period of constant rain that had kept us from any riding for days. Once the
rain stopped, we went out with the hawks, hoping to catch some waterfowl. We
saw some birds in a meadow beneath a rise. My father went forward and slipped
on them a goshawk that was intermewed. The hawk flew up with the flushed
birds, footed59 one of them and came to earth. But we could not see that it had
any game. We dismounted where it had landed and – of all things – it had caught
a starling,60 closing its talons around it without injuring or hurting it. The
austringer bent down and released the starling, which was safe and sound.
[217] I have seen fortitude and courage in the ‘salamander-goose’ like the
fortitude and courage of men. Here is an example. We once slipped our sakers on
a flock of salamander-geese and beat the drum. They flew off and the sakers
came up on the geese and took one, which they brought down to the ground far
away from us. The goose cried out and five or six others rushed to it, beating
back the sakers with their wings. Had we not arrived quickly on the scene, they
would have got away with the goose that had been taken and would have cut up
the sakers’ wings with their beaks.
This is in contrast to the courage of the bustard. When the saker gets near to
the bustard, it descends to the ground. In whatever way the saker circles round it,
the bustard keeps its tail facing the saker. When the saker closes in, the bustard
mutes61 on it, covering its feathers and filling its eyes. If the bustard misses, then
the saker will take it.
One of the most unusual hunts that a hawk engaged in with my father (may
God have mercy upon him) took place like this:
My father had on his wrist a young hawk, still downy.62 On a stretch of water
was an ‘ayma,63 which is a large bird the colour of a heron, but bigger than a
crane, measuring fourteen spans from the tip of one wing to the other. The hawk
began to seek out the ‘ayma, so my father slipped it upon it and beat the drum
for it. The ‘ayma flew up, but the hawk struck at its middle and managed to take
it. They both then fell into the water. As it was, this was the cause of the hawk’s
escape, for if it hadn’t done so, the ‘ayma would surely have killed it with its
beak. But one of the attendants threw himself into the water, clothed and
armoured, and grabbed the ‘ayma and lifted it out. When it got to dry ground, the
hawk just looked at it, [218] screeched and flew away from it, and didn’t bother
it again. I have never seen a hawk try to hunt an ‘ayma, save that one. For the
‘ayma is as Abu al-’Ala’ ibn Sulayman64 said regarding the phoenix:
‘I consider the phoenix too great to be caught in the chase.’
My father (God have mercy upon him) used to head out for the Bridge
Fortress, which was rich with game, and would stay there for a few days. We
would accompany him, hunting partridge, francolin, waterfowl, roe-deer, gazelle
and hare. One day he headed out there and we rode out to chase francolin. My
father slipped at a francolin a certain goshawk that was carried and trained by a
mamluk named Niqula. Niqula then set off at a gallop behind the hawk, but in
the meantime the francolin had taken cover in a thicket of brambles. Suddenly,
the cries of Niqula filled our ears and he returned at full gallop.
‘What’s wrong with you?’ we asked.
‘A lion came out of the thicket where the francolin came down,’ he replied, ‘so
I left the hawk behind and fled.’ But – guess what? – the lion was as cowardly as
Niqula! When it heard the jingling bells65 of the hawk in flight, it ran out of the
thicket and fled towards the Ghab.66
One day, my father (may God have mercy upon his soul) went out to hunt
gazelle, and I – still but a lad – accompanied him. Arriving at Wadi al-Qanatir,
he came upon some slaves – bandits69 engaging in highway robbery. So he
caught them, tied them up and handed them over to a group of his attendants to
deliver them to the dungeon at Shayzar. As for me, I took a spear from one of
them and we continued on to the hunt.
Suddenly, a herd of wild asses appeared. So I said to my father, ‘My lord, I’ve
never seen wild asses before. With your permission, I’d like to gallop ahead to
get a look at them.’
‘You may do so,’ he replied.
Under me was a chestnut horse, a thoroughbred. I galloped ahead with that
spear, the one I took from the bandit. I went directly into the midst of the herd,
singled out one ass and began thrusting the spear at it, but it didn’t do a thing to
the animal, on account of the weakness of my arm and the dullness of the spear-
point. So I drove back the ass until I had steered it back to my companions, who
bagged it. My father and the men with him were amazed by the way that
thoroughbred ran.
God (glory be to Him) decreed that I should go out one day to pass the time
looking at the river of Shayzar, riding that horse. I was accompanied by a
Qur’an-reciter who would recite poetry for a bit, then the Qur’an for a bit and
then sing for a bit. I dismounted under [221] a tree and handed over my horse to
my attendant, who made hobbles for it. He happened to be alongside the river
and the horse took fright and fell into the river on its side. But every time it
wanted to stand up, it would fall back down again in the water because of the
hobbles. The attendant was a young boy and he was not able to save it. All the
while we didn’t even know what was going on. Finally, when the horse was
nearing death, the attendant yelled for us, and we came over to the horse, but it
was breathing its last. We cut the hobbles and brought it out, but it died. The
water in which it drowned did not even reach to the upper part of its leg – it was
rather the hobbles that killed it.
[223] Early one morning on the first of Rajab, while we were fasting,73 I said
to my father (may God have mercy upon him), ‘I wish I could go out hunting to
keep my mind off the fast.’
‘Then go,’ my father said.
So I went out with my brother Baha’ al-Dawla Abu al-Mughith Munqidh (may
God have mercy upon him) towards the cane-brakes, and we brought a few
goshawks with us. As we went in among the liquorice-bushes74 a wild boar
emerged, and so my brother thrust his spear at it and wounded it, and it fled back
into the liquorice-bushes.
My brother said, ‘Pretty soon that wound will start hurting him and then he’ll
come out. I’ll face him head-on, stick him with my spear and kill him.’
‘You’d better not do that,’ I advised. ‘You might hit your horse and kill it.’
As we were talking, the boar came out, heading for another cane-brake. My
brother confronted it and thrust his spear in the hump on the boar’s back, but the
front of the spear he used snapped while still stuck in the boar. The boar ran
under the chestnut mare my brother was riding. The horse was pregnant and had
three white legs and a white tail. The boar collided with the horse and knocked it
over and over again. As for the horse, its hip was dislocated and it was ruined.
As for my brother, he dislocated his little finger and broke his ring!
I galloped off behind the boar, which went into an area thick with liquorice-
bushes and asphodel.75 There were some cattle sleeping there, but I did not see
them due to that undergrowth. A bull rose up out of the herd and struck the chest
of my horse, knocking it down. I fell to the ground, and the horse too, with its
bridle snapped. I got up, took my spear, mounted up and caught up with the
boar,76 which had thrown itself into the river. I stood on the bank of the river and
hurled my spear at it. The spear stuck in the boar, but snapped at a length of two
cubits, leaving the spear-head imbedded. The boar swam on towards the other
side of the river, so we shouted to a group of people on that side who were
preparing mud-bricks to build some houses in a village belonging to my uncle.
They came and stood over the boar while it was below the bank, unable to climb
up. Then they started throwing large rocks at it, trying to kill it. I said to one of
my grooms, ‘Go down to it.’ So he took off his gear and stripped naked. Taking
up his sword, he swam over to the boar and finished it off. Then he dragged it by
the leg and brought it to me, saying, ‘May God acquaint you with the blessings
of the Rajab fast! For we have inaugurated it with the impurity of swine.’
[224] If the boar had claws and fangs like a lion, it would be even more
dangerous than the lion. I once saw a wild sow that we had roused from its litter
of suckling piglets. One of the young began ramming with its snout the hoof of
the horse of an attendant who was with me. It was the size of a cat. The attendant
took an arrow from his quiver and, leaning down to it, skewered it on the arrow
and lifted it up. I was amazed at how it had attacked, ramming a horse’s hoof
while, at the same time, it could be carried about on a mere arrow.
One of the wonderful experiences I had hunting would take place when we
went out to the mountains to hunt partridge, bringing ten goshawks with us to
hunt with all day long. The austringers would be scattered all through the
mountains, each one of them accompanied by two or three horsemen from our
mamluk troops. We had with us two houndsmen: the name of one of them was
Butrus and the other Zarzur Badiya. Every time one of the austringers would slip
a bird onto a partridge and flush it out, he would shout, ‘Hey, Butrus!’ and
Butrus would come running over to him like a racing-camel. He would keep that
up all day long, running about from mountain to mountain, he and his colleague.
Once, when he had gorged the hawks and turned back for home, Butrus took a
stone and run after one of the mamluks and hit him with it, and the mamluk in
turn took a stone and hit Butrus. Butrus, who was on foot during all this, kept
chasing the attendants, who were mounted, throwing stones at them all the way
back from the mountains to the city-gates, just as if he hadn’t spent the entire
day running back and forth from one mountain to another.
One of the strange things about zaghariya-hounds is that they will not eat
birds. They will not eat any part of them, except their heads and feet (which have
no meat on them) and the bones from which the hawks have already eaten the
meat.
My father (may God have mercy upon him) had a black zaghariya-bitch; our
attendants used to rest [225] a lamp on her head during the night while they sat
and played chess. She never made a movement, and she continued doing this
until she became dim-sighted. My father (may God have mercy upon him) used
to upbraid the attendants, telling them, ‘You’ve gone and blinded this bitch!’ but
they never refrained from it.
The amir Malik ibn Salim, the lord of Qal’at Ja’bar, sent a beautifully trained
bitch to my father as a gift, which could be loosed beneath the sakers on
gazelles. We saw her do many wonderful things.
Now, hunting with sakers has a system to it. First, the leader is cast off and it
strikes the gazelle, binding to its ear. The assistant is then slipped and strikes
another gazelle. A second assistant is slipped and does likewise, and the fourth
saker is slipped in this way too. Each saker strikes one separate gazelle. The
leading saker, clutching the gazelle’s ear, isolates it from the others and all the
sakers join it and abandon the other gazelles previously struck. Meanwhile, this
bitch is below the sakers, concentrating solely on the gazelle to which the sakers
are binding. Sometimes it happens that an eagle might appear, so the sakers let
go of the gazelle, which escapes, while the sakers circle. We noticed that the
bitch would leave the gazelle at the same time as the sakers did and that she
would go round in a circle on the ground beneath the sakers, just as they did in
the air. She would continue doing this until the sakers were called down. Then
she would stop and walk behind the horses.77
Between Malik ibn Salim and my father (may God have mercy upon them
both) there was a formal bond of friendship, and they corresponded with letters
and messengers. One day, Malik ibn Salim sent a message to my father saying, ‘I
went out hunting gazelle and we caught three thousand fawns in one day.’
But that was just because gazelles abound up around them [226] in the region
of Qal’at Ja’bar. They just go out during the season when the gazelles are giving
birth, on horse and on foot, and take up whatever young have been born that
night, the previous night and two or three nights before. They just sweep them
up, the way grass or twigs are swept up.
Francolins abound too in the cane-brakes along the Euphrates. If a francolin is
cut open, cleaned out and stuffed with hair, then its odour will not turn for many
days.
One day, I saw a francolin that had been cut open and its crop removed. Inside
the crop there was a snake that the francolin had eaten, about a handspan in
length. One time while we were hunting, we killed a snake and another snake
came out of its stomach. The first snake had swallowed it whole and it was only
a little smaller than the first.
It is thus in the nature of all beasts for the strong to prey upon the weak:
Injustice is a feature of every living soul. Should you find
Someone of integrity, then he only refrains because of
some defect.78
§ Concluding Reflections
To cover all the experiences of the hunt that I have witnessed over the past
seventy years of my life is not possible, nor can I accomplish it. For to waste
your time telling tales to amuse you is one of the worst calamities that could ever
abuse you. As for me, I seek forgiveness from God the Exalted for wasting the
dregs of my life that remain in activities other than obedience to Him and the
pursuit of divine recompense and heavenly gain. For He – may He be blessed
and exalted – all sins He forgives, and from His mercy rich bounties He gives.
He is the Generous One – never disappointing those who in hope do persist, for
those who entreat Him, He can never resist.
[227] Praise be to God, the Lord of the Worlds, and the blessings of God and
peace be upon our master Muhammad, His prophet and upon all his pure family.
God is sufficient for us, and in Him we trust.79
At the end of the book are the following words that are reproduced here:
I have read this book from beginning to end over numerous sessions under
my lord, my grandfather, the pre-eminent amir, the virtuous scholar, the
perfect leader, ‘Adud al-Din, companion of kings and sultans, most notable
of Arabs, sincere counsellor to the Commander of the Faithful – may God
perpetuate his good fortune! I asked him to provide me with a certificate to
authorize me to transmit the contents of this book to others, and he agreed to
do so, inscribing it in his noble hand. That was on Thursday, 13 Safar, in the
year 610 (4 July 1213):
‘I certify that this is true. Signed by his grandfather Murhaf ibn Usama ibn
Munqidh, who praises God and begs His blessing.’
OTHER EXCERPTS
Guide to Contents
I have faced combat and battles with perils most dire, warmed myself I have
on their blazing fire. I came to war early, while I was but fifteen years of age
until I passed into my nineties, when I became a home-body, one of those left
behind, from all warfare resigned. For I am no longer reckoned of any import, no
longer called to assemblies of any sort, after being the first to be named when
considering my kind, the most worthy at any gathering of worthies, you’d find. I
was the first, at my comrades’ attack, to advance the banner royal, the last to be
drawn from the field, for any ripostes I could foil.
To how many battles have I borne witness? If only
Before I was laid low with age, in one of them, I had been slain.
For it is a finer thing for a stripling to be killed in battle, more welcome,
Before Time can lay him waste or afflict him.
By your father’s name! I never held back from facing perdition in war:
My free-wheeling blade will testify to that much!
[17] But God has determined that I will be detained
Until my appointed time. What, then, can I do?
In the year 468 (1076), my grandfather Sadid al-Mulk ‘Ali ibn Munqidh
began building the Bridge Fortress4 and thereby put pressure upon the citadel of
Shayzar.
At Shayzar, there was a governor for the Romans, whose name was
Demetrios.5 When this aforementioned Demetrios considered the blockade to
have gone on too long, he (and those Romans with him) sent a message to my
grandfather concerning handing over the citadel of Shayzar to him, adding
certain conditions that they imposed upon him, including: a certain amount of
money that he would give to the aforementioned Demetrios; maintaining the
property of the bishop of the place, who lived there, for he continued to dwell
there under the authority of my grandfather until he died at Shayzar; and that he
would pay the quntariya6 – that is, the Roman infantrymen – their salaries for
three years.
[16] So my grandfather handed over to them what they stipulated, and the
citadel of Shayzar surrendered on a Sunday in Rajab, in the year 474 (December
1081). The aforementioned Sadid al-Mulk ‘Ali remained as its lord until he died
there on 6 Muharram, in the year 479 (22 April 1086). His son, Abu al-Murhaf
Nasr, ruled after him until he died in the year 491 (1097–8). Nasr’s brother, Abu
al-’Asakir Sultan, ruled until he died there and his son Muhammad ibn Sultan
ruled until he died beneath its rubble, he and three of his own sons, in the
earthquake7 in this aforementioned year, that is, the year 552, on Monday 3
Rajab (11 August 1157).
§ The Bravery of the Caliph al-Mustarshid8
I met with Jamal al-Din al-Mawsili11 in the year 555 (1160), while I was
travelling on pilgrimage to Mecca. There existed between us an old bond of
amity, familiarity and close companionship. He invited me to come into his
home in Mosul, but I declined, and remained in my tent on the river-bank. Every
day during my sojourn there, he would ride out and cross the bridge over to
Nineveh, the atabeg having ridden out to the training-grounds.12
He would send a message to me saying, ‘Come out and ride: I’m standing
waiting for you.’
So I would mount up and come, and he and I would talk. One day, I ran into
him while we were apart from my companions. I said to him, ‘I’ve got
something on my mind that I’ve wanted to tell you ever since we met, but it has
never happened that there was a free moment. Now at the moment we are free.’
‘So tell me,’ he said.
I said, ‘I’ll tell you what al-Sharif al-Radi13 said:
This counsel for you comes from the innermost heart of one
Who does not just heap spite on you by way of blame.
For my affection for you denies me permission
To see you involved with any sin you may claim.
You have given very freely in the spending of treasury-moneys for alms and
for the leading men of piety and good works, but rulers cannot bear to see money
given away, and their hearts become unsettled about it, even if people give it
away out of their own inheritance – this is what happened to the Barmakids.14 So
think carefully about what you have given away of the funds you brought in.’
He remained silent for a moment, eyes downcast, and said, ‘May God reward
you with good fortune! But the matter [22] has already surpassed what you
feared.’
So I left him, travelled to the Hijaz15 and returned from Mecca by the Syrian
Road. Jamal al-Din was ousted and he died later in prison.
§ Introduction
Verily, the soul is content when that which it desires is learned, and becomes
importunate in its pursuit when it is spurned. My blessed father Majd al-Din
Murshid (may God be pleased with him) related to me that when he went forth
to serve the Sultan Malikshah17 (may God have mercy upon him), while the
latter was in Isfahan, he made for the home of the judge, the imam, the
honourable and learned Abu Yusuf al-Qazwini18 (may God have mercy upon
him), to visit him and to offer his greetings, as they had known [2] one another
of old, and as Abu Yusuf was bound by a bond of gratitude to my grandfather
Sadid al-Mulk ‘Ali (may God have mercy upon him).
That bond of gratitude came about because, in the days of al-Hakim,19 the ruler
of Egypt, the aforementioned judge travelled to Egypt. Al-Hakim treated him
favourably, bestowed honours upon him and presented him with a splendid gift.
But Abu Yusuf begged to be excused from this gift and asked if al-Hakim could
instead make a gift to him of some books that he proposed to take from the
caliphal library. Al-Hakim agreed to that and Abu Yusuf entered the library and
selected from it what books he wanted. Later, he took ship, and those books with
him, heading for the lands of Islam in the Levant. But the wind turned on him
and hurled the ship to the city of Latakia,20which was controlled by the Romans.
He grieved at his plight and feared for himself and the books he had with him,
and so he wrote a letter to my grandfather Sadid al-Mulk (may God the Most
High have mercy upon him), saying: ‘I find myself in Latakia in the midst of the
Romans, and with me books of Islam; I am to be got cheap; are you willing to
make the leap?’
[3] So that very day, Sadid al-Mulk dispatched to him his son, my uncle ‘Izz
al-Dawla Nasr (may God have mercy upon him), sending with him many
horsemen from his attendants and troops, and a mount to transport him and carry
his belongings. Nasr came to him and carried him and his belongings away. Abu
Yusuf remained with my grandfather (may God have mercy upon him) for a long
period of time. During this time there formed between him and my father (may
God have mercy upon him) bonds of solicitude and intimacy. And so when my
father travelled to Baghdad, he went to Abu Yusuf to renew his acquaintance
with him. My father (may God have mercy upon him) gave me the following
account of it:
I went in to him, and with me was the sheikh Ibn al-Buwayn21 the poet,
for he had been a scribe for my grandfather (may God have mercy upon
him). I found that Abu Yusuf had reached such an age that those features
with which I once could recognize him had changed and he had forgotten
much of what he had once known. But, when he saw me, he recognized me
after some questioning, for he had left me when I was but a youth and he
now saw me as a grown man.22
And so he inquired after my travels and I informed him about my journey
to the palace of the sultan. He said, ‘Extend my greetings to Khawaja Buzurk
Nizam al-Din,23and inform him that the first part of the commentary that I
compiled, which part is the commentary on the Qur’anic verse “In the Name
of God the Compassionate, the Merciful!”, has gone missing. Ask him to
request that a copy be made from the copy that is in [4] his library and have
it sent to me.’ He had compiled a commentary on the Qur’an in one hundred
volumes.
As a result of his weakness and his advanced age, he reclined on his bed in
a position somewhere between sitting and lying down, his books surrounding
him, and he writing. The sheikh Ibn al-Buwayn greeted him, but he didn’t
recognize him, and Abu Yusuf said, ‘Who are you?’ Ibn al-Buwayn replied,
‘Your servant, Ibn al-Buwayn, scribe to the amir Sadid al-Mulk.’ ‘Al-
Buwayn?’ Abu Yusuf retorted. ‘What’s that? God damn al-Buwayn!’ Then
he thought for a moment and asked, ‘Are you the poet, grammarian and
scribe?’ Ibn al-Buwayn replied, ‘Yes.’ So Abu Yusuf recited:
They said, ‘It’s al-Sulami!’ So I said, ‘Lady, cover yourself. That’s a teat-
squeezer, a seller of milk.’24
Then he returned to his conversation with me and noticed that the sheikh
Ibn al-Buwayn had taken a book from those books that were surrounding his
bed, and so Abu Yusuf snapped at him: ‘The idiot comes to a person, takes
his ease and reads whatever is around of books, as if to say “I am of the
learned sort!”. What you really need is for what is in your hand to be brought
down upon it!’ And he took it from him, and that book was the Book of the
Staff.
Ever since I heard this nearly sixty years ago, I have sought out the Book of the
Staff in Syria, Egypt, Iraq, the Hijaz, Upper Mesopotamia and Diyar Bakr, but I
never found anyone who knew of it. Every time its existence was denied to me,
my covetousness for it increased, until despair induced me to compile [5] this
book and title it the Book of the Staff. I do not know whether that other book
took the same form as mine or a different form. Nevertheless, I saw to it that my
soul attained what had set it afire, just as when Jacob satisfied his soul’s desire.25
I have no doubt that the author of that book had a purpose and in its composition
and adornment he excelled, while I, having missed out on something I desired,
was to its mere execution and over-embellishment compelled. This book of
mine, even if it is empty of the sort of learning with which literary works are
embellished or which those highest in virtue pursue, is at least not devoid of
narratives and verses that comfort the soul in their expanse, and whose
placement here will improve the lot of those who upon them should chance.
I open the book with an account of the staff of Moses (upon him be peace),
then an account of the staff of Solomon, son of David (upon him be peace), then
I abandon myself to mentioning narratives and poems that make reference to
staves. I do not claim to have accomplished a definitive accounting about staves
in what I have collected; only those accounts that I have memorized and heard
myself have I selected.
In God (to whom belong glory and power) I seek refuge and beg Him to
protect, should my hand write anything that is with sin or defect. From His
mercy (may He be exalted) for forbearance and forgiveness I look, for my
preoccupation with trifles instead of reciting His Holy Book. For He – may He
be praised! – is the closest of those you might call, in entreating Him the most
generous of all.
§ A Catchy Tune
At Hisn Kayfa in Shawwal of the year 567 (May–June 1172), someone in
whom I trust related to me the following. ‘There was in the service of the amir
Malik ibn Salim, lord of Qal’at Ja’bar, a lute-player called Abu al-Faraj. He told
me:
One day I was in the assembly-hall of the amir Malik ibn Salim while he
was drinking to the point of [184] drunkenness. I withdrew to my own house,
but no more than two hours of the night had elapsed when his messenger
came before me and said, ‘The amir calls for you.’ I said, ‘I waited until he
got drunk before I went home!’ The messenger replied, ‘He has commanded
me to take you into his presence.’
And so I went with him and I saw the amir sitting down. The amir said,
‘Abu al-Faraj! After you withdrew, I fell asleep and I saw in a dream a
person singing to me a song, which I remembered but then forgot, and I
would like you to remind me of it.’ So I said, ‘My lord, recite for me a word
from it.’ He replied, ‘I do not remember anything about it. But instead, recite
for me what you have on hand.’ So I recited for him many songs while he
kept saying, ‘This is not the song that I dreamt about!’ He then said, ‘Leave
me! And think so that you might remember!’
So I withdrew and woke early in the morning to rise to his service. The
amir said, ‘Hey, Abu al-Faraj! Anything happen with that song?’ I replied,
‘My lord, only God (may He be praised and exalted) knows the unseen.’ The
amir then said, ‘By God! If you do not remember it, I will expel you from the
castle!’ ‘By God, my lord,’ I said, ‘I don’t know! How can I recall a song I
never heard and from which not one word was ever mentioned?’ [185] ‘Take
him and expel him,’ the amir ordered. And so, they took me out to al-
Bulayl26 and I remained there for a day, after which he had me returned and I
entered again into his service just as I was before.
Then, one day, I was in the assembly-hall singing when one of the servants
said to me, ‘There is a man at the door asking for you.’ So I went out to him
and saw a man wearing a dark turban, like those of the Maghrib. He greeted
me and said, ‘I have come to you so that you might obtain access for me to
be admitted into the hall of the amir, for I am a singer.’ So I went in and
informed the amir of this man and said, ‘My lord, if he is a good poet, then
listen to him and let him into your service, or, if not, then give him
something and he will go away.’ The amir then admitted him, and the man
entered, greeted the amir, sat down, took out his lute and sang:
The amir said, ‘There is no God but God! This, by God, is the song that I
dreamt about and of which I asked you!’ I and all who were present were
astounded at this coincidence.
§ Usama on Pilgrimage in Jerusalem
I did not see this account in writing, rather, I have merely related it as I heard
it.
§ A Staff of Invisibility
Those who are practised in war and know its stratagems – who know well that
men fear deception and are wary of tricks and ruses that might have bad results
or prove to be weak – these people do not hold to be true the tales that historians
and poets have told about those events. For resoluteness in war is more effective
than audacity. I have battled the Franks (may God confound them) in places and
countries so numerous that I cannot count them, and I never once saw them
defeat us and then persist in pursuing us, nor do their horses do more than amble
or trot, fearing that some stratagem will befall them. How could anyone with a
brain in his head [260] convince himself to get into a sack tied up around him or
into a chest? How can a man hide with a sack tied around him?
The words of the philosopher, ‘The king has power only over his subjects’
bodies, not [73] their hearts’, reminded me of an affair I witnessed in Cairo in
the year 547 (1152–3), to wit:
The messenger of the King of Ethiopia came bearing a letter to Ibn al-Sallar40
(may God be pleased with him). The king asked him to order the patriarch of
Egypt to remove the patriarch of Ethiopia41 (for that entire country answers to
the opinion of the patriarch of Egypt). So Ibn al-Sallar ordered the patriarch to
be brought before him, and he came while I was in his presence. He was an old,
emaciated and starving man. He was brought forward to the door of the throne
room, where he stopped. He then greeted Ibn al-Sallar, turned away and sat
down on a low bench in the outer court.
So Ibn al-Sallar sent a message to him saying, ‘The king of the Ethiopians
complained about the patriarch who is currently appointed over his country, and
he asked me to order you to remove him from his post.’
The patriarch replied, ‘My lord, I did not appoint this man simply to try him
out. I think he is quite suitable to carry out the Holy Law to which he himself is
subject. There does not appear to me to be anything in his conduct which would
necessitate his removal. Moreover, it is not permitted in my religion to do
anything about this matter that is not absolutely necessary, and so it is not lawful
for me to remove him.’
Ibn al-Sallar (may God have mercy upon him) was enraged at his reply and
ordered him to be imprisoned. After two days, Ibn al-Sallar sent a message to
him (and I was present), saying to him, ‘You will eventually have to remove that
patriarch, since it was the king of the Ethiopians who requested it.’
The patriarch answered, ‘My lord, I have no reply other than the one that I
have already given you. Your authority and your power lie only over the humble
body you see before you. As for my religious beliefs, you cannot touch them. By
God! I will not remove him, even should every loathsome thing befall me!’
And so Ibn al-Sallar (may God have mercy upon him) ordered him to be
released, and he apologized to the king of the Ethiopians.
A battle took place between us and the Isma’ilis in the citadel of Shayzar in
the year 507 (1114).50 Thanks to a ruse they played on us, they gained possession
of the fortress of Shayzar while our bravest fighting men were out riding beyond
the town. The sheikh and scholar Abu ‘Abdallah Ibn al-Munira51(may God have
mercy upon him) was in my father’s house instructing my brothers (may God
have mercy upon them). When the alarm sounded in the fortress, we galloped
back and used ropes to climb up.
The sheikh Ibn al-Munira had moved to his own home near [191] the mosque
(for his home was in the mosque). My uncle Fakhr al-Din Shafi’ (may God have
mercy upon him) arrived just below the mosque, with the sheikh Ibn al-Munira
looking from above. So a companion of my uncle shouted up to him: ‘Hey,
Sheikh Abu ‘Abdallah! Dangle a rope down to us!’
Ibn al-Munira replied, ‘But I don’t have a rope!’
The other man then suggested, ‘Well, dangle down your turban-cloth!’
But he took a long time over it, so the other man gave up on him and climbed
up at another location. It was later asked of sheikh Ibn al-Munira: ‘Were you
actually naked while wearing a turban on your head?!’
He replied, ‘No, I didn’t even have on a turban!’
Then Ibn al-Munira thought for a bit and said, ‘No, wait! By God, Wahb ibn
al-Tanukhi, who was with the amir Fakhr al-Din Shafi’, had said to me, “Dangle
a rope down to us!” and I replied, “But I don’t have a rope!” So he said, “Dangle
down your turban-cloth!” And if he had not seen a turban on me, he would not
have said such a thing!’
And so, he was naked (may God have mercy upon him), wearing only a
turban, and he, whether through fear or weakness of heart, didn’t even know
what state he was in.
Something like that happened at Ascalon to one of the notables of the town,
called Ibn al-Jullanar, who was infatuated with hunting with sparrow-hawks and
famous for his strength. One day, he rode out from Ascalon with a sparrow-hawk
on his wrist to hunt in a copse of sycamore trees, and a pair of Bedouin
horsemen rode out against him.
They ordered, ‘Dismount!’
So he dismounted from his horse and said to them, ‘Do you want anything of
this bird?’
‘No,’ they replied. So he perched the sparrow-hawk on the branch of a tree.
Then they disputed over the spurs52 that bedecked his feet, so Ibn al-Jullanar
said to them, ‘There are two of you. Each one of you should take a single spur,’
and he extended his legs to them.
So they sat down trying to detach the spurs from his feet, and Ibn al-Jullanar
grabbed one by the neck and the other by the neck, and beat their two heads
together. They were locked in his grip, so he killed them. Then Ibn al-Jullanar
took their horses, their weapons and his sparrow-hawk and entered the city!
§ Concluding Remarks
Learning is not a peak that the searcher climbs to the top of; it has no end-
point where the seeker can finally stop. So multifarious is it, that it is impossible
to embrace; too vast it is to gather in one place. Alas, our lifetimes are dwindling
and evermore restricted, and still the vicissitudes of Time can never be predicted.
If only the soul, when it rebelled, did not get scarred55 in its spite, and, when it
was chastised, did not quarrel or fight. For a man of ninety-one it is better to love
piety and good deeds, than it is to compose books like these frivolous screeds.
By Time was this man most convincingly persuaded – by its subtle effect on his
senses, not some argument clearly related. In this way Time warned him to
change his ways, as ever closer came the end of his days.
For though steadily through life has he sped, in fact he is most certainly dead,
alive only metaphorically, it is said. Humbled in his captivity to the Lord of the
Worlds does he now appear, he trusts in the promise, this son of his ninetieth
year, a promise he heard from the Prophet Muhammad, sincere. May God grant
His Messenger and his [468] family, who are pure without peer, and his pious
Companions steadfast in God-fear, and his chaste wives the Mothers of the
Faithful so dear, eternal blessings as the Day of Reckoning draws near.
Register of Proper Names
This Register of Proper Names is not a complete index to all the personal
names that occur in the texts translated in this book. It is rather intended as a list
of the complete forms of names of the most significant personages,
corresponding with the name-form used in the translation, with a brief statement
of identification. In general, if Usama has mentioned a person more than twice,
he (there are no women that qualify) will be listed here.
‘Abbas Rukn al-Din ‘Abbas ibn Abi al-Futuh ibn Tamim ibn Badis.
Murderous stepson of Ibn al-Sallar, who replaced him as vizier in the
Fatimid court in Egypt.
al-Afdal Ridwan Al-Afdal Ridwan ibn al-Walakhshi. One-time vizier of
Fatimid Egypt, he was exiled to Syria, where Usama tried to get him to ally
with the Burids of Damascus against the atabeg Zangi. Instead, he returned
to Egypt, where he was captured and imprisoned. After a daring escape, he
raised a revolt, but was killed.
‘Ali ibn Abi Talib Cousin of the Prophet Muhammad and fourth of the
‘Rashidun’ or Rightly-Guided caliphs recognized by all Muslims. He was
also the first of the imams recognized by all Shi’ite Muslims, and thus a
figure of significant veneration. He was murdered in 661.
Baha’ al-Dawla Munqidh Baha’ al-Dawla Abu al-Mughith Munqidh ibn
Murshid. Usama’s brother, he accompanied him to Damascus after his
exile, and is known as an informant for some later historians of the era.
Baldwin Baldwin II of Le Bourcq. Participant in the First Crusade, count of
Edessa (1100–1118) and later King of Jerusalem (r. 1118–31). Taken
prisoner in 1123, he was billeted briefly at Shayzar while the terms of his
ransom were negotiated.
Bohemond Bohemond I of Taranto. Leader of the Italian–Norman
contingent of the First Crusade and prince of Antioch (r. 1099–1111). His
son, known in the text simply as ‘the son of Bohemond’, reigned later as
Bohemond II (1126–30).
Bursuq Bursuq ibn Bursuq was named governor of the Iranian province of
Hamadhan and later made isbasalar or general over the Seljuk armies sent
to counter the Franks in Syria in 1115 and was badly defeated at Danith.
He died in 1116.
Dhakhirat al-Dawla Hittan Dhakhirat al-Dawla Abu al-Qana Hittan ibn
Kamil ibn ‘Ali ibn Munqidh. Usama’s paternal cousin. In his later life, he
became governor of Yemen for Saladin. He died in 1184. His name is
sometimes read as ‘Khitam’.
Fakhr al-Din Shafi’ Fakhr al-Din Abu Kamil Shafi’. Usama’s uncle.
Fulk Fulk V, count of Anjou, Touraine and Maine. Later King of Jerusalem
(r. 1131–43) through his marriage to Queen Melisende, daughter of
Baldwin II. As King of Jerusalem, he interacted with Usama on numerous
occasions.
al-Hafiz Al-Hafiz li-Din Allah, Fatimid caliph (r. 1131–49). Usama entered
his service in 1144.
Ibn Butlan Yuwanis ibn al-Hasan ibn ‘Abdun ibn Butlan. Celebrated
Baghdad-born, Christian physician (and theologian). He worked for
Usama’s grandfather in the late 1050s and died in 1066.
Ibn Masal Najm al-Din ibn Masal. Fatimid vizier deposed by Ibn al-Sallar.
He died in 1150.
Ibn Mula’ib Sayf al-Dawla Khalaf ibn Mula’ ib al-Ashhabi. Former
governor of Homs, he was imprisoned by the Seljuks and, upon his release,
was made governor of Apamea by the Fatimids. From there, he developed
a taste for banditry and for harassing the Banu Munqidh at Shayzar. He
was assassinated in 1106.
Ibn al-Munira Abu ‘Abdallah Muhammad ibn Yusuf, known as Ibn al-
Munira. Religious scholar born in Kafartab, but moved to Shayzar, where
he worked as Usama’s tutor.
Ibn Ruzzik Abu al-Gharat Faris al-Muslimin al-Malik al-Salih Tala’i’ ibn
Ruzzik al-Ghassani al-Armani. Fatimid vizier (1154–61).
Ibn al-Sallar Al-’Adil Abu al-Hasan ‘Ali ibn al-Sallar (or al-Salar). Fatimid
vizier (1150–53). Stepfather of ‘Abbas, who had him murdered in 1153.
Il-Ghazi Najm al-Din Il-Ghazi ibn Artuq. Amir of the Artuqid dynasty,
reluctant servant of the Seljuks and lord of Mardin and Nisibis. With
Tughtakin, he joined in an alliance with the Franks against the Seljuk army,
led by Bursuq in 1115. In 1118, he became lord of Aleppo and presided
over the crushing defeat of the Franks at the Field of Blood in 1119. He
died in 1122.
‘Izz al-Dawla ‘Ali ‘Izz al-Dawla Abu al-Hasan ‘Ali ibn Munqidh al-Kinani.
Usama’s older brother. He moved from Shayzar to Damascus and
accompanied him upon his exile to Egypt, settling at Ascalon to wage jihad
against the Franks. He died in battle there in 1152.
‘Izz al-Dawla Nasr ‘Izz al-Dawla Abu al-Murhaf Nasr ibn ‘Ali ibn Munqidh
al-Kinani. Usama’s paternal uncle and former lord of Shayzar. He died in
1098.
Joscelin Joscelin I of Courtenay. Usama knew him as the lord of Tall Bashir,
a fief in the county of Edessa, and he later became count of Edessa himself
in 1119. He died in 1131.
Jum’a Abu Mahmud Jum’a al-Numayri. An Arab amir in the army of
Shayzar, a famous local champion.
Kamil the Scarred Kamil al-Mashtub. A Kurdish amir in the army of
Shayzar.
Khir-Khan ibn Qaraja Lord of Homs in Syria (r. 1118–29). Brother of
Mahmud ibn Qaraja.
Layth al-Dawla Yahya Layth al-Dawla Yahya ibn Malik ibn Humayd ibn
al-Mughith ibn Nasr ibn Munqidh al-Kinani. A cousin of Usama’s whom
the latter mentions as a warrior at Shayzar in his youth.
Mahmud Troubled son of the hero Jum’ a.
Mahmud ibn Qaraja Shihab al-Din Mahmud ibn Qaraja, lord of Hama (r.
1118–23). A frequent foe and sometime ally of the Banu Munqidh of
Shayzar.
Majd al-Din Murshid Majd al-Din Abu al-Salama Murshid ibn ‘Ali ibn
Muqallad ibn Nasr ibn Munqidh al-Kinani. Usama’s father (1067–1137).
Malik ibn Salim Shihab al-Din Malik ibn Shams al-Dawla Salim ibn Malik
al-’ Uqayli, lord of Qal’ at Ja’ bar on the Euphrates. Not to be confused
with his ancestor Najm al-Dawla Malik ibn Salim.
Malikshah Jalal al-Dawla Abu al-Fath Malikshah I ibn Alp-Arslan. Seljuk
sultan (r. 1072–92). It was to him that Usama’s father travelled on his
journey to Isfahan.
Mawdud Sharaf al-Din Mawdud ibn Altuntakin. Seljuk governor of Mosul.
The sultan appointed him his general or isbasalar over the army sent
against the Franks of northern Syria in 1111.
Mu’in al-Din Mu’ in al-Din Unur (or Anur, Anar). Vizier and atabeg for the
Burid princes of Damascus and one of Usama’s early patrons. He died in
1149.
Nasir al-Dawla Kamil Nasir al-Dawla Kamil ibn Muqallad ibn Munqidh.
Usama’s paternal cousin.
Nasr Nasir al-Din Nasr ibn al-’ Abbas. Fatimid amir, son of the scheming
vizier ‘Abbas. Taken prisoner in 1154 while fleeing Egypt with his father
and Usama. He was later executed in Egypt.
Nur al-Din Al-Malik al-’ Adil Nur al-Din Mahmud ibn Zangi. Son of the
atabeg Zangi and heir to his lands in Syria. He captured Damascus in 1154
and became Usama’s patron when the latter returned to that city later that
year. He died in 1174.
Qara Arslan Fakhr al-Din Qara Arslan ibn Da’ud. Artuqid lord of Hisn
Kayfa and one of Usama’s later patrons. He died in 1167.
Ridwan Fakhr al-Mulk Ridwan ibn Tutush ibn Alp-Arslan. Seljuk lord of
Aleppo. He died in 1113.
Roger Roger of Salerno. Frankish regent of the principality of Antioch (r.
1112–19). He defeated the Seljuk army under Bursuq at Tall Danith in 1115
but was himself defeated and killed at the Field of Blood in 1119.
Sadid al-Mulk ‘Ali ‘Izz al-Dawla Abu al-Juyush Sadid al-Mulk ‘Ali ibn
Muqallad ibn Nasr ibn Munqidh al-Kinani. Usama’s grandfather, the
conqueror and first lord of Shayzar. He died in 1086.
Shihab al-Din Mahmud Shihab al-Din Mahmud ibn Taj al-Muluk Buri ibn
Tughdakin. Burid lord of Damascus during Usama’s first residence there (r.
1135–9).
Sultan ‘Izz al-Din Taj al-Dawla Abu al-’ Asakir Sultan ibn ‘Ali ibn al-
Muqallad ibn Nasr ibn Munqidh al-Kinani. Usama’s uncle and lord of
Shayzar during most of Usama’s life. His name should not be confused
with the title ‘sultan’ given to Seljuk rulers. He died in 1154.
Tancred Nephew of Bohemund, regent of Antioch and Edessa and frequent
foe of Shayzar. He died in 1112.
Timurtash Husam al-Din Timurtash ibn Il-Ghazi. Artuqid lord of Mardin
and (briefly) Aleppo, and son of Il-Ghazi. He died in 1154.
Tughdakin Sayf al-Islam Zir al-Din Abu Mansur Tughdakin (also
Tughtakin, Tughtigin), atabeg in Damascus and founder of the Burid
dynasty. He died in 1128.
Usama ibn Munqidh Majd al-Din Abu al-Muzaffar Usama (also Usamah)
ibn Murshid ibn ‘Ali ibn Munqidh al-Kinani. Author of the texts included
in this book (1095–1188).
al-Yaghisiyani Salah al-Din Muhammad al-Yaghisiyani (also al-Ghisyani).
Chamberlain, general and trusted amir of the atabeg Zangi, made governor
of Hama. He was Usama’s commanding officer while in Zangi’s service.
al-Zafir Al-Zafir bi-A’ da’ Allah. Fatimid caliph (r. 1149–54), involved in
various court intrigues during Usama’s service in Egypt.
Zangi ‘Imad al-Din Abu al-Muzaffar Zangi (also Zengi, Zanki, etc.) ibn
Qasim al-Dawla Aq-Sunqur. Turkoman commander, atabeg of Mosul, later
lord of Aleppo and northern Syria. Founder of the Zangid dynasty and
Usama’s first patron. He died in 1146.
Glossary
1.… there were not many Muslim casualties in that battle: The first 21 folios
of the manuscript are missing, so the text begins in the middle of the first
surviving account. It is not certain what battle Usama refers to here.
According to his own accounting (see ‘An Enumeration of Usama’s
Battles’ in the Lost Fragments from The Book of Contemplation in Other
Excerpts, below), Usama was engaged in only two serious battles with the
Franks under Zangi. Hitti (Memoirs, p. 25) favours the encounter near
Qinnasrin of 532 (1138); Rotter (p. 238, n. 1) does not specify. But it is
more likely the battle at Rafaniya of 531 (1137) that is intended here since
Usama explicitly states of Qinnasrin that ‘there was no actual engagement’,
which hardly fits this gory account. Moreover, Ibn al-Qalanisi (Ta’rikh, p.
259) describes a battle matching Usama’s description, and locates it at the
fortress of al-Bari’a, near Rafaniya.
2. al-Rashid: ‘Abbasid caliph in Baghdad (r. 1135–6), succeeding his father
al-Mustarshid, who took the throne in 1118.
3. the atabeg: By this title, Usama means his first patron, the atabeg Zangi
ibn Aq-Sunqur, ruler of Mosul, Aleppo and much of northern Syria (r.
1127–46).
4. gilded cuirass: (Arabic jawshan mudhahhab) a lamellar cuirass of small
(gilded) metal plates, not a ‘gilden byrnie’ as in Hitti (Memoirs, p. 25).
Usama’s point is one of irony, i.e., that this ostentatious armour, intended to
protect its wearer, instead attracted the attention of the enemy and so led to
his death.
5. Ibn al-Daqiq: This Arabic nickname ‘Slender-son’ or ‘Flour-child’,
depending on your interpretation, is more likely an attempt to reproduce
the sounds of a Frankish name or title. Miquel (p. 94, n. 6) suggests
‘Benedict’. He is no doubt identical to the ‘Philip ibn al-Daqiq’ mentioned
in Ibn al-Athir, al-Bahir fi’l-dawla al-atabakiya, ed. A. Tulaymat (Cairo:
Dar al-Kutub al-Haditha, 1963), pp. 101–2.
6. king of the Romans: (Arabic malik al-Rum) by ‘Romans’, Arabic writers
usually meant the Byzantines, who indeed called themselves Rhomaioi,
Romans. I intentionally retain the inaccuracy. In this case, the Byzantine
‘king’ is the emperor John II Com-nenus, who invaded Syria in the spring
of 1138. The siege lasted from 28 April until 31 May.
7. Al-Yaghisiyani: This is Usama’s commanding officer, Salah al-Din
Muhammad al-Yaghisiyani. He was Zangi’s chamberlain and leading amir.
8. You’d better find… your lands: Zangi had made al-Yaghisiyani his
governor over Hama. The latter’s son Ahmad was named governor of
Baalbek.
9. Mosul: Headquarters of the atabeg Zangi and chief city of Upper
Mesopotamia.
10. So I rode out and reached Shayzar: The remainder of this passage is
nearly illegible in the original and has vexed all editors and translators. My
own translation is a compromise and mostly follows the readings of
Samarrai (p. 27). Hitti (Memoirs, p. 27) reads this passage as describing
Usama’s woe at the destruction wrought by the Byzantine siege of Shayzar.
But Gibb (p. 1006) was the first to point out that the treacherous al-
Yaghisiyani is the most likely culprit. Cf. Miquel, p. 97. As Usama later
describes, the siege of Shayzar was not, on the whole, so very destructive,
and it does not feature in the list of prominent battles he witnessed (see ‘An
Enumeration of Usama’s Battles’ in the Lost Fragments from The Book of
Contemplation in Other Excerpts, below).
What seems to be described is as follows: hearing in Hama of the approaching
Byzantine troops, Usama’s wish was to return to his family’s nearby castle at
Shayzar to help defend it. Al-Yaghisiyani, however, wished instead to retreat to
Mosul, and so sought to force Usama’s withdrawal by seizing his household in
Hama while he was off in Shayzar. As we shall see, Usama remained in Shayzar
for the siege and then deserted Zangi and sought service in Damascus.
11. the lord of Damascus: Shihab al-Din Mahmud ibn Buri, prince of the
Burid dynasty (r. 1135–9), Usama’s new lord. Not to be confused with
Shihab al-Din Mahmud ibn Qaraja, lord of Hama.
12. eight years… numerous battles: That is, 1138–44, eight years inclusive.
Curiously, none of these ‘numerous battles’ is named in Usama’s list
accounting (see ‘An Enumeration of Usama’s Battles’ in the Lost
Fragments from The Book of Contemplation in Other Excerpts, below).
Perhaps they were not major engagements.
13. fiefs: (Arabic al-iqta’) these are not exactly the same as fiefs familiar in
the medieval West, being more properly the granting of rights over tax-
money rather than the land itself, and not involving homage. But as the
practice developed, the two institutions were close enough by Usama’s
time to merit the translation here.
14. the commander Mu’in al-Din: Mu’in al-Din Unur (sometimes Anar,
Anur), mighty atabeg of the Burid princes, d. 1149.
15. certain things came to pass: Usama was involved in court intrigues in
Damascus against Mu’in al-Din, involving the latter’s rival, the local
headman, Ibn al-Sufi. But the exact circumstances are very vague. See
Cobb, pp. 30–31.
16. Concerning this, I say: With this poem, Usama tries to claim to Mu’in al-
Din that anything the latter may have heard against him (such as rumours
of a plot) was just slander, and his flight from Damascus was not evidence
of his guilt but rather a selfsacrificing gesture to remove the source of
Mu’in al-Din’s troubles.
17. al-Hafiz: Al-Hafiz was caliph of the Fatimid dynasty (r. 1131–49).
18. dinars: The dinar was the standard gold coin of the Islamic world.
19. al-Afdal ibn Amir al-Juyush: Fatimid vizier, d. 1121.
20. black troops: (Arabic al-sudan) a special corps of black Africans
purchased as slaves and trained as soldiers. The fighting began on 23
September 1149.
21. Al-Hafiz was overwhelmed by all this: Reading, with Miquel (p. 98, n. 3),
ghuliba minhum for Hitti’s ghaba ‘anhum.
22. not even two goats locked horns over it all: That is, the expected furore
never occurred.
23. Al-Zafir… Ibn Masal: Al-Zafir was Fatimid caliph (r. 1149–54). Ibn
Masal was effectively in control of Fatimid affairs even before being
named vizier. On him, see EI2, s.v.
24. the amir Ibn al-Sallar: Also ‘Ibn al-Salar’ in some sources. On him, see
EI2, s.v. ‘al-’Adil ibn Salar’. He was governor of Alexandria at this time.
25. Go out to al-Hawf: That is, the eastern Delta region of Egypt, an area
used by the rulers of Egypt to settle and recruit Arab tribesmen since early
Islamic times.
26. large host of Lawata: A tribe of Berber origin, though Usama (and
others) describe them as Arabs.
27. ‘Abbas (a stepson of Ibn al-Sallar): As Usama states more specifically
below, ‘Abbas was the son of one of Ibn al-Sallar’s wives and Tamim ibn
Badis, a prince of the Zirid dynasty of Tunisia who died in exile in
Alexandria.
28. Dalas: A town in Upper Egypt on the left bank of the Nile.
29. ‘al-Malik al-’Adil’: ‘The Just Ruler’.
30. that night: 26 Ramadan 544 (27 January 1150).
31. lote tree: (Arabic Nabq) Zizyphus spina Christii, also known as the
jujube tree.
32. Nur al-Din: Nur al-Din Mahmud (r. 1146–74) was son and successor of
the atabeg Zangi and lord over Zangid possessions in northern Syria and,
eventually, Damascus and central Syria as well. Like Ibn al-Sallar, he too
bore the title al-Malik al-’Adil.
33. Tiberias: A large city in northern Palestine on the Sea of Galilee
conquered by the Franks and held in fief by Raymond of Tripoli.
34. Gaza: A prominent town of southern Palestine, conquered by the Franks.
As Usama notes, it was at that time being rebuilt, the citadel being granted
to the Templars by Baldwin III of Jerusalem.
35. Ascalon: A coastal town in southern Palestine. It was the Fatimids’ main
bridgehead and military centre in Palestine, having held out against the
Franks for over fifty years. As it was located just a few kilometres north of
Frankish-held Gaza, it was largely isolated except by sea.
36. a camel-load of clothes… and turbans: It is worth noting that, correctly
loaded, a camel can bear upwards of 200 kilos. Dabiq was a town (precise
location unknown) of the Nile Delta noted for its gold brocades and
colourful linens. Ciclatoun (Arabic siqlatun) is an undefined luxury cloth,
perhaps of silk and gold; Chaucer mentions it in the Tale of Sir Thopas.
Squirrel-fur was a luxury imported from the northern steppes and much
prized in the south. Dimyat is better known as Damietta, a principal town
of the Delta that was, like Dabiq, renowned for its finely woven cloth.
37. al-Jafr: Located in modern Jordan, this is a desert outpost northeast of
Ma’an, indicating that Usama was hoping to avoid crossing through the
more densely settled Frankish lands west of the Jordan River by sticking to
the less populous (and less firmly controlled) lands to the east. Al-Jafr is
thus not an ‘oasis in the desert between Egypt and Palestine’ as claimed by
Hitti (Memoirs, p. 35, n. 27).
38. Mahri camels: The region of Mahra in southern Arabia was famed for its
noble and swift camels, prized in battle.
39. mamluk-troops: The term mamluk is used almost exclusively to denote
soldiers of slave or servile origin, usually captured prisoners of war from
peoples beyond the frontiers of the Islamic world, above all Turks.
40. a garment, a brayer, a barker and a bead: An odd locution; Usama is
perhaps taking note, as many city-dwelling literati of his day did, of the
quaint and curious vocabulary of the Bedouin. Or at least he is pretending
to do so.
41. sandarach resin: (Arabic sindarus) the resin of the Tetraclinis articulata
tree, used for incense and for medicinal purposes in the medieval Islamic
world.
42. who are you then?: Usama condescends into the colloquial here (Arabic
aysh antum?) to talk with the Bedouin.
43. They only eat carrion: A practice strictly forbidden in the Qur’an (5:4).
44. Hisma: The rocky highlands bordering the eastern edge of the Gulf of
‘Aqaba in southern Jordan and northern Arabia.
45. Since the feast of Ramadan: Better known as ‘Id al-Fitr, ‘the Feast of
Fast-Breaking’, or al-’Id al-Saghir, ‘the Lesser Feast’, marking the end of
the Muslim holy month of Ramadan.
46. orach leaves: (Arabic qataf) orach or mountain spinach (Atriplex
hortensis) may well be one of the oldest and most common of cultivated
plants known, valued for its nutritious green leaves.
47. Feast of Sacrifice: (Arabic ‘Id al-Adha) also known as the Great Feast,
al-’Id al-Kabir, celebrated on the tenth day of the month of Dhu’l-Hijja,
meaning Usama’s Bedouin hosts had been without food for nearly two
months. As this trip took place in 544 (1150), we can place Usama’s visit
to al-Jafr at roughly 10 April 1150.
48. abridged and combined… camels ran off: As Usama clarifies below, the
point is that Usama and his men stopped to pray while the camels with the
guides continued ahead, leaving Usama without direction in the desert. In
accordance with Islamic law, Muslims are allowed to shorten and combine
prayers (normally said at intervals throughout the day) when travelling.
49. bridle and some Maghribi dinars: The original text is obscure.
According to Hitti, it reads sarfasar dananir maghribiyya, which he says
could also be sarfasar dhahab wa-dananir maghribiyya, ‘a gold bridle and
Maghribi dinars’. The bridle certainly seems out of place in this list of
treasure unless it is precious. The reader should take note that a single gold
dinar weighed, in the ideal, about 4.25 grams – Usama’s bag of four
thousand dinars, then, would have weighed 17 kilos, or a little under 40
pounds – no small parcel.
50. Wilderness of the Children of Israel: The Sinai Desert.
51. Bosra: An ancient city (Roman Bostra) of the Hawran region of central
Syria, 140 km south of Damascus, the site of striking Roman ruins,
including an amphitheatre that was used as a fortress in the Middle Ages.
52. Asad al-Din Shirkuh: Shirkuh ibn Shadi was one of the atabeg Zangi’s
Kurdish amirs. He went on to serve Zangi’s son Nur al-Din, under whom
he became one of the leading military men of the regime. He was also the
uncle of the future sultan Saladin.
53. Sunday night: (Arabic laylat al-ithnayn) ‘the night of Monday’, but as
the day was held to begin at nightfall by medieval Muslims, this
corresponds to Sunday night.
54. yours truly: The Arabic actually reads fa-qala li ‘ya fulan…, a common
idiom used to avoid naming someone. Hitti translates this (as many do) as
‘O so-and-so’, which hardly makes sense to the uninitiated. In this case,
Usama uses the idiom out of (a somewhat pretentious) humility to avoid
mentioning his own name in his text.
55. the very heart of Frankish territory: And thus not ‘by-passing the
frontiers of the Latin Kingdom’ as I claimed in Cobb, p. 36.
56. ‘Ayn al-Dawla al-Yaruqi: An amir once in the service of the Burids of
Damascus and, as luck would have it, one of Usama’s principal foes during
his tenure there (see Vie, pp. 230–31). It is not clear that Nur al-Din sent
him with Usama out of ill-will, as Miquel (p. 110, n. 85) suggests.
57. the Cave of the Seven Sleepers: (Arabic al-Kahf wa’l-Raqim) a location
frequently designated by either of these two Arabic names or (as here) both
of them at once. The names are first mentioned in the Qur’an in association
with the legend of the Cave of the Seven Sleepers (18:9–26). But the exact
location is never specified, leaving the exegetes to assign various locales.
The most popular was that accepted here by Usama, a place somewhere in
the region of ‘Amman, perhaps, as Hitti (Memoirs, p. 39) suggests, to be
identified with the stunning (and cleft-ridden) ruins of the Nabatean city of
Petra.
58. pay us a little good-morning visit: (Arabic sabahuna) to give the
customary morning visit. Usama is indulging in bravado here.
59. fools: The word is illegible in the original, but the context clearly refers
to the Muslim infantry – and not very kindly.
60. My brother… Ascalon: Usama’s brother ‘Izz al-Dawla ‘Ali had thus not
been in Ascalon ‘for the past few years’, as stated in Cobb, p. 36, but had
come with him.
61. Bayt Jibril: Better known as Bayt Jibrin, a small town about halfway
between Gaza and Jerusalem, controlled by the Franks and, since 1134, a
base for the Frankish military order of the Knights Hospitaller.
62. Yubna: Modern Yavne, on the coast about 30 km south of Tel Aviv,
Frankish Ibelin. The castle there was built between 1140 and 1143.
63. As for the unrest… it happened like this: On this confusing sequence of
events, see Vie (pp. 236–54) and Cobb (pp. 37–42).
64. Bilbays to defend the country from the Franks: Once the principal city of
the eastern Delta, Bilbays was an important Fatimid garrison on the
invasion route into and out of Palestine. Ibn al-Sallar is here sending troops
to garrison the city and guard Egypt’s frontier, and so is certainly not
sending them, as Hitti has it (Memoirs, p. 43), ‘for the conquest’ of the city.
65. household managers: Usama uses a Perso-Arabic title ustadh-dar, a
director of the household affairs of the vizier or caliph; a major-domo.
66. public chambers… private quarters: The ‘private quarters’ (Arabic dar
al-haram) included, as the Arabic name suggests, what modern readers
might call the ‘harem’, i.e., the women’s quarters, but they also included
much else besides that was not for the view or access of strangers. They are
here contrasted with the public chambers (dar al-salam), where guests
were received and lodged.
67. came to loathe Nasr: As other chroniclers hint, ‘Abbas may have been
angry that his son and the caliph had become lovers, an anger that Usama
helped to fuel (see Kamil, 11:191–2).
68. Then the caliph ignored him… ropes: In this whole passage, the Arabic
pronouns are indeterminate: it could well be Nasr, playing coy, who is
ignoring the caliph.
69. My lord… Day of Judgment: Usama’s little speech here is laced with
Qur’anic vocabulary.
70. son of al-Zafir: This is the Fatimid caliph al-Fa’iz (r. 1154–60), having
acceded at about the age of five.
71. sons of al-Hafiz: These are some of the brothers of the slain caliph al-
Zafir alluded to above, and thus, despite their irenic statement to ‘Abbas,
they stood as possible rivals for the succession.
72. Then ‘Abbas came out… blood was pouring out of him: I have taken
some liberties with the original Arabic syntax here. What is being
described is ‘Abbas dragging Yusuf out by the neck, using a wrestler’s
head-lock, not a decapitated head as in Miquel (p. 119), for reasons
explained in the next note.
73. brought the two of them… killed them there: In Arabic faadkhaluhima…
wa-qataluhima. The use of the dual in the Arabic indicates two victims,
one Abu al-Baqa, the other clearly Yusuf, who thus cannot have been
decapitated (see note above). This second victim therefore cannot be Abu
al-Baqa’s unnamed father as Miquel (p. 119) suggests.
74. Ibn Ruzzik: Governor in Upper Egypt who would become (as Usama
chronicles here) the last of the truly powerful Fatimid viziers, holding the
post from 1154 to 1161. A mosque that he built outside the walls of
medieval Cairo still bears his name (al-Tala’i’) and is one of the principal
Fatimid monuments of the city. On him and the events being described by
Usama, see EI2, s.v. ‘al-Tala’i”.
75. He then returned… command of things: In Arabic ‘ada ila darihi wa-
amrihi wa-nahyihi, literally, ‘he returned to his palace and his commanding
and forbidding’. ‘Commanding and forbidding’ refers to the beloved
Islamic ethical formula that all Muslims, especially statesmen, are
encouraged to adopt, namely to command the good and forbid the wrong.
Here it is used to suggest that ‘Abbas was back to the business of running
Egypt and, possibly, putting a bit of stick about, too.
76. Barqiya: In the eastern part of Cairo, named after Barqa, the north
African region where many of the troops came from.
77. Victory Gate: (Arabic Bab al-Nasr) the principal north gate of the old
city walls of Cairo, which still stands.
78. From my fief… full of grain: Here Usama is quite clear about what an
iqta’ (see n. 13 above) of his day involved. Kum Afshin was about 15 km
to the north of Cairo.
79. the early morning hours of Friday: One recalls here that the horoscope of
‘Abbas had, after all, recommended a Saturday departure (see above).
80. al-Muwaylih: Usama is evidently taking more or less the same route he
took on his first mission to Syria. Al-Muwaylih is a desert outpost about 50
km northeast of ‘Aqaba, in modern Jordan – despite Hitti’s claim
(Memoirs, p. 53, n. 76).
81. Wadi Musa: ‘The Valley of Moses’, or Vaux Moyse to the Franks. This is
the stunning canyon and area of badlands around Petra, in modern Jordan.
82. stone-pelted devils: An allusion to Qur’anic imagery of Satan and the
practice of pelting places associated with him with stones.
83. Rabi’a and Mudar: Two of the principal genealogical groupings of Arab
tribes. Usama’s point is that there was plenty of water to go around.
84. that battle with the Franks: At al-Muwaylih, described above.
85. 130 mithqals: A mithqal is an Arabic measure of weight ideally equal to
the weight of a gold dinar coin, or about 4.25 grams, making this ‘saddle’
weigh 552.5 grams, just over one pound, thus absurdly light if the text is
accurate. But the term saraj, usually translated as ‘saddle’, in fact refers
not merely to the saddle itself, but to all its accoutrements, including straps
and saddle-cloths, and it must be the latter that is drawing Usama’s
attention here. Saddle-cloths could indeed be richly sewn and decorated
(for examples, see the medieval drawings of horsemen collected in Carole
Hillenbrand, The Crusades: Islamic Perspectives (London: Routledge,
2000), pp. 446–55). Even so, an embroidered cloth of one pound in weight
would be very thin (and unkind to its mount). Perhaps Usama refers solely
to the weight of the gold used in the embroidery. Cf. Hitti, Memoirs, p. 54,
n. 81.
86. Husam al-Mulk: This man, nephew of ‘Abbas, is not to be confused with
the Husam al-Mulk who was the son of ‘Abbas, and who was killed by the
Franks during this battle, as mentioned above.
87. he apologized and kept silent: That is, Husam al-Mulk is implying that
Usama’s men stole the saddle unfairly, while Usama hastens to point out
that he, after all, is its proper owner.
88. al-Afdal Ridwan: This is al-Afdal Ridwan ibn al-Walakhshi, a Fatimid
vizier who was ousted by a rising of the troops against him on 14 June
1139. He fled to Syria, where Usama met him (see below). He is not to be
confused with a Ridwan prominent in the early history of the Crusades,
Ridwan ibn Tutush, Seljuk lord of Aleppo.
89. Perhaps… kindness: Here Usama consciously echoes the ‘injustice and
ingratitude’ he cited earlier.
90. Salkhad: A fortified city of the Hawran region of central Syria, some 120
km southeast of Damascus.
91. Amin al-Dawla Gumushtagin al-Atabaki: Gumushtagin was lord of
Salkhad and then Bosra beginning in 1110 (despite Hitti, who misreads the
name).
92. Ridwan… putting it to siege: As Usama clarifies below, Ridwan has
come to Baalbek seeking military aid from his fellow Fatimid officer in a
bid to oust his enemies from Egypt. Zangi’s siege of Baalbek took place
from August to October 1139.
93. Mu’in al-Din: The atabeg of Damascus, where Usama was based at the
time.
94. ruler of Egypt: (Arabic ‘Aziz Misr) an allusion to the title given to the
iniquitous Pharaoh in the Qur’an (12:30, 51), a title adopted (ironically) by
some later Muslim rulers of Egypt. Despite Hitti’s claim (Memoirs, p. 57,
n. 91), it was not ‘a title borne by the Fatimite caliphs’, though there was
one caliph called ‘Aziz.
95. Amin al-Dawla: Gumushtagin, Ridwan’s host. Here, Ridwan enlists the
aid of Gumushtagin in his attempt to return to Egypt and seize power there
(contrary to what I stated in Cobb, p. 33).
96. first arrived in Cairo: Usama arrived in Cairo in November 1144.
Ridwan had returned to Cairo as Zangi was besieging Baalbek in 1139. It is
thus five years since Ridwan was captured and imprisoned.
97. Wednesday night: (Arabic laylat al-khamis) ‘the night of Thursday’, 13
April 1148, according to Derenbourg (Vie, p. 210, n. 2).
98. crossed over into Giza: That is, from the right bank, where Fatimid Cairo
is located, to Giza (and the nearby Pyramids) on the left bank.
99. Master of the Gate: (Arabic Sahib al-Bab) traditionally the next-in-line
to become vizier. This, in fact, was Ridwan’s post before his rise to power.
100. al-Aqmar Mosque: The ‘Moon-Lit’ Mosque, whose elaborate white-
grey decorations still dazzle. The mosque was built some decades earlier,
in 1125, in the northern part of Fatimid Cairo.
101. The Egyptians… acquire his valour: Cannibalism, though not unknown
in Usama’s world, is of course strictly forbidden in Islam. The account is,
in any case, almost certainly just a literary device by which Usama
underlines the depth of the scheming Ridwan’s fall from grace.
102. even if the divine decree had not been executed: That is, on ‘Abbas,
whose own story started this digression about Ridwan.
103. On that day: That is, the day the Franks attacked Usama and killed
‘Abbas at al-Muwaylih en route to Syria: Usama has returned to the main
thread after the digression about Ridwan.
104. twenty ratls of blood: A ratl is a unit of weight, though it was
occasionally, as here, employed to measure volume. In this case, it is
roughly equivalent to a pint or .568 litres, so twenty ratls is about eleven
litres of lost blood. Since the human body only contains about five litres of
blood, the man is clearly exaggerating for rhetorical effect.
105. entered the service of Nur al-Din: In June 1154. By this time, Damascus
had finally submitted to Nur al-Din, who made it his capital, though he
spent much of his time on campaign in the north.
106. Aswan: Then, as now, the southernmost city of Egypt and bridgehead
into East Africa. Note that, for Usama in Syria, it is easier to cross to
Aswan from Mecca in Arabia than to return to Cairo and proceed up the
Nile.
107. the king of the Franks: Baldwin III of Jerusalem (r. 1143–63), the first
Palestinian-born King of Jerusalem who, among other things, finally
captured Ascalon from the Fatimids in 1153, just before Usama’s arrival in
Damascus. In contrast to his relations with Baldwin III, Usama had been
on rather good terms with his father and predecessor as King of Jerusalem,
King Fulk of Anjou, as he describes below.
108. with his cross right on it: Perhaps indicating the royal seal.
109. in the region of Ra’ban and Kaysun: Two cities located on the upper
Euphrates in eastern Anatolia. Kaysun is also known as Kaysum. They
belonged to Mas’ud, sultan of the Seljuks of Rum, and were the subject of
some of Nur al-Din’s military campaigns in 1155.
1. Mahmud ibn Qaraja: Shihab al-Din Mahmud ibn Qaraja (d. 1123). His
father, Qaraja, had been lord of Harran and then Homs. Upon Qaraja’s
death in 1113, Mahmud’s brother Khir-Khan became lord of Homs and
named him lord of Hama. He is not to be confused with Shihab al-Din
Mahmud ibn Buri, Burid lord of Damascus (r. 1135–9). See Kamil, 10:373,
493.
2. having no result: (Arabic ma taghabb) the point is not that there was no
respite (as in Hitti, Memoirs, p. 63), but that no one was gaining any
ground.
3. You do not even think… extra measure: Usama also cites this anonymous
poem in his collection Lubab (p. 47).
4. Malik ibn al-Harith al-Ashtar: Malik al-Ashtar (d. 658) was a renowned
warrior, partisan of the caliph ‘Ali and general nuisance to all his rivals
during Islam’s early decades. On him, see EI2, s.v. ‘al-Ashtar’. Malik’s
epithet al-Ashtar (‘Droopy-Eyed’) can, in fact, refer to two separate eye-
conditions: entropion, the folding-in of the eyelid onto the surface of the
eyeball, or ectropion, the folding-out of the eyelid so that it droops
markedly down and away from the eye.
5. in the days of Abu Bakr al-Siddiq: That is, during the so-called Ridda
Wars in Arabia shortly after the death of the Prophet Muhammad in 632.
His successor, the caliph Abu Bakr (known also as al-Siddiq), led Muslim
armies against those tribes that had renounced their allegiance to Islam.
6. returned to Hama: Much of the account that follows is not clear in the
original and, thus, its reading is conjectural.
7. quntariya-spear: The quntariya is a spear of Byzantine origin (cf. Greek
kontarion), probably with a wooden haft. Usama also uses the more
generic term rumh, which is properly the classic Arab spear, slightly longer
than the quntariya, and with a cane or reed haft.
8. ‘Antara ibn Shaddad: ‘Antara ibn Shaddad al-’Absi was a famous poet of
pre-Islamic Arabia (sixth century). As the verses cited indicate, his father
was a proud ‘Absi tribesman, but his mother a slave. On him, see EI2, s.v.
‘Antara’.
9. Apamea: (Arabic Afamiya) an ancient city located a few kilometres
northwest of Shayzar in the Orontes Valley. The southern-most possession
of the Crusader lords of Antioch, it was frequently used as a base for
incursions further into Syria. Known also as Qal’at al-Mudiq, it is
dominated today by an impressive medieval walled town and a vast field of
Classical ruins.
10. Il-Ghazi: Najm al-Din Il-Ghazi ibn Artuq was a member of the Artuqid
family and a prominent commander in the Seljuk army.
11. the year 513: The date Usama provides is incorrect. In fact, this is the
date of another battle, not that of the Battle of al-Balat, better known in the
West as the ‘Field of Blood’ or ager sanguinis, which took place on 28
June 1119.
12. Roger: Roger of Salerno was regent of the Principality of Antioch (r.
1112–19). Typically for the era, Roger had once been an ally of Il-Ghazi,
when the two joined forces against the Seljuks at the Battle of Tall Danith
in 1115. Roger’s massacre of prisoners in the wake of that battle gained
him widespread infamy.
13. Wadi Abu al-Maymun… pillagers: The precise location of Wadi Abu al-
Maymun, ‘The Valley of the Father of Bohemond’, is not known, but it is
clearly in the vicinity of Apamea. The ‘pillagers’ appear to be irregular
troops whose job was to raid the hinterland of a city for animals, crops and
other movable property.
14. hauberk: (Arabic dir’) a heavy shirt of armour made of mail.
15. gambeson: (Arabic tijfaf) a form of ‘soft armour’, a quilted felt garment
worn, as in this example, beneath hard armour, the dir’ or mail hauberk.
Cf. Hitti (Memoirs, p. 68): ‘wearing a coat of mail and the full armor of
war’.
16. bumped backwards from the seat of my saddle: That is, he was jolted
over and behind the low back support of his saddle-seat, not completely
unhorsed as Derenbourg (Vie, p. 41) has it. Though taller than modern
riding saddles, medieval Islamic saddles had a relatively low back and
lacked the wrap-around support (the cantle) of medieval European saddles.
17. saddle-blanket: It is not clear what is meant exactly by the generic term
markub thaqil fidda, as markub usually indicates a riding-animal itself, but
here clearly indicates some part of its saddle-gear. That it is described as
thick and of silver suggests a saddle-blanket akin to the gold-embroidered
one described in an earlier account at the end of Part I.
18. the dark mare: Literally, ‘the green mare’ (Arabic al-khadra’) or perhaps
as Gibb (p. 1007) ingeniously suggests, it is the horse’s name: ‘he was
riding al-Khadra’.
19. Thus I say… do no damage: In fact, the technique that Usama is
advocating is known from medieval Islamic manuals of war as the ‘Syrian
thrust’, though it is not entirely clear from his description if it is similar to
the couched technique of medieval European cavalry of this time and later.
20. that little bone that is in one’s chest: What Usama terms al-’usfura,
which has perplexed most translators. As the term was used to designate
the blaze on a horse’s head or (colloquially) vertical pegs used on ploughs,
it seems that Usama means the sternum here (as Miquel, p. 152, n. 29,
suggests), and not a ‘vein’ as in Hitti (Memoirs, p. 70).
21. With this hand… all things: An allusion to Qur’an 3:26.
22. man born to our household: The kinship term Usama uses is muwallad,
that is, a child of a slave or mamluk, and who is thus also a slave, born into
the household of the owner.
23. woman’s get-up: (Arabic ma’raqat imra’a) which kind of clothing is not
stated. Usama’s point (as is clarified below) is that he appeared not just
comical, but unarmed.
24. I am waiting… horses of those infidels: A pious way of saying he’s going
to steal them.
25. He wasn’t wearing any trousers: The absent article of clothing is
specified as sarawil. That is, his legs were unprotected, a detail that
becomes relevant below.
26. Mu’in al-Din: Atabeg of Burid Damascus and patron of Usama.
27. at the time I was an enemy of Hama’s lord: This context allows us to fix
the date of these events between 1136 and 1137, when Usama himself was
working for the atabeg Zangi and his commander al-Yaghisiyani at Hama.
28. for pity’s sake: The implication of the Arabic is that the gift would serve
as alms.
29. bodyguard: The Arabic word is al-jandariya, from Persian jan-dar.
30. Mudhkin: Hitti reads this as ‘Muthkir’, and was unable to identify it. But
as a village named Mudhkin in the vicinity of Kafartab is known from
other sources, it would seem to be a variant spelling on Usama’s part. Cf.
Ibn al-’Adim, Zubdat al-Halab min ta’rikh Halab, ed. Sami Dahhan
(Damascus: IFAO, 1968), 2:47. Usama’s man is thus a local boy.
31. Kafartab: A small fortified town on the medieval road from Shayzar to
Aleppo, once a possession of Usama’s family.
32. controlled by al-Yaghisiyani: That is, Usama’s commanding officer in
Hama – this explains why one of Usama’s men is involved.
33. two farsakhs: A farsakh was a measure of distance roughly equivalent to
6 km.
34. one day… Rafaniya: The atabeg Zangi, Usama’s lord at the time, was
besieging a small fortified town, about 40 km northwest of Homs.
35. brought from town: The town where Usama’s horses are stabled is Hama,
where he was posted, just a few kilometres away. Oddly, Hitti (Memoirs, p.
74) leaves this phrase out altogether.
36. at the end of this particular period: That is, of this cluster of discrete
battles and encounters, which punctuated Usama’s early career, as he says
explicitly in the introduction to this section, above. Thus, this was not ‘the
battle which was the last to take place in this war’, as Hitti (Memoirs, p.
74) has it, since the battle described in this account, against the Muslim
Banu Qaraja of Homs and Hama, was not part of Zangi’s siege against
Frankish Rafaniya, described in the preceding account.
37. rolled out the red carpet for them: (Arabic wa-basatnahum) an
expression used to describe the cheery greeting of guests. Usama is being
ironic here, a nuance lost in Hitti’s ‘we encountered them’ (Memoirs, p.
74).
38. kazaghand… aventail: A kazaghand (from Persian kaz-agand, ‘stuffed
silk’) describes a multi-layered form of armour which included a layer of
mail as well as internal padding and external (often decorative) fabric; an
aventail (Arabic litham) is the leather or armoured piece that dangles from
the back of a helmet, protecting the neck and throat, as should be clear
from the rest of the account. It is thus not a ‘visor’ as Hitti (Memoirs, p. 74)
has it.
39. chisel-headed arrow: The reading is uncertain. The root of the key term,
k-sh-m, denotes anything ‘cut off from its origin’, especially a nose cut off
from one’s face. This would suggest that the arrow is of the blunted broad-
headed type, normally associated with hunting rather than war. Such
hunting arrows could be used in war against unarmoured foes, or against
horses. This would coincide with Usama’s intent here, as he says this
wound was akin to the ‘similar thing’ that occurs in the next account,
namely a trifling arrow wound that kills its victim against all expectation.
His point is that, had the soldier been wearing an aventail, the arrow would
have been harmless, but Fate had other plans.
40. Kar’a: I have been unable to identify this location (also read ‘Lar’a’), but
it is clearly a place between Apamea and Shayzar.
41. out of fear of the Kurds: The Arabic text reads ‘ala khawf al-akrad.
Kurds were commonly recruited as soldiers in Islamic armies of this period
in Syria, Iraq and elsewhere. But Samarrai (p. 70, n. 134) makes the
interesting suggestion that this may be a misreading of a placename Harf
al-Akrad or the like, i.e., the location to which Shihab al-Din has
withdrawn.
42. Jum’a: The Numayri warrior of Shayzar whom Usama depicts above as a
model of warrior’s disdain.
43. Burj al-Khurayba: The reading of this toponym, Burj al-Khurayba or al-
Khariba, ‘the Tower of the Little Ruins’ or ‘Stoneheap Tower’, is
complicated here by the interposition of the name ‘Musfan’ in the
manuscript, itself marked as if to suggest that the copyist saw it as an error
of some kind. But this is probably the Hisn al-Khurayba, mentioned below.
44. But I am in the home of my father: Mahmud ibn Qaraja indicates here his
loyalty to his hosts, Usama’s family – he was not actually related to them.
Usama’s uncle plays along.
45. and then through three on his right: Hitti (Memoirs, p. 76) omits this last
phrase.
46. How close the funeral to the wedding: Here Usama alludes to a line of
early Islamic poetry, attributed to various authors, ‘And so does Fate act:
his funeral was the closest of things to his wedding.’
47. Qays ibn al-Khatim: An Arabian poet (d. 620).
48. the Ansar: Literally, ‘Helpers’. These were those natives of Medina who
supported the Prophet Muhammad and his cause when he emigrated to that
city.
49. Battle of al-Hadiqa: Hadiqa was an area of orchards and gardens just
outside Medina, where a pre-Islamic battle between the tribes of Aws and
Khazraj was fought.
50. court of the sultan Malikshah: For ‘court’ Usama uses the Persian term
dar-gah. Malikshah was sultan of the Seljuk dynasty from 1072 to 1092.
51. the Cerdagnais: Usama calls him al-Sardani, i.e., William Jourdain II
(Guillem-Jorda II), count of Cerdagne and lord of Tripoli (1105–9). The
attack would have taken place around 1108.
52. al-Find al-Zimmani: The sobriquet of the pre-Islamic poet Sahl ibn
Shayban (seventh century).
53. al-’Ala: That is, the Jabal al-’Ala region of rocky uplands, not far from
Antioch, extending from the west bank of the Orontes River to the vicinity
of the town of Idlib in northern Syria.
54. Turcopoles: (Arabic turkubuli) native mercenary troops employed by the
armies of the Franks. Some were Muslim, others were converts from Islam
or were native Christians. They are usually interpreted as light cavalry, but
in fact served a variety of military functions.
55. dagger in his boot: Usama uses the Persian word dashneh to denote this
dagger, which is a short, double-edged knife.
56. Ibn Mula’ib: Sayf al-Dawla Khalaf ibn Mula’ib al-Ashhabi was a
notorious bandit and warlord in northern Syria, a constant thorn in the side
of local rulers, including the Banu Munqidh of Shayzar. He was eventually
murdered and the Franks captured Apamea not long after these events.
57. javelin: Usama uses the Persian word khisht, a light javelin used by
footmen.
58. In that chest… forty-three of them: Copying the complete text of the
Qur’an was considered an act of great piety. That said, it was not standard
Muslim burial practice to include burial goods. By masatir, ‘copy-books’,
Usama means the lightly ruled quires of paper that copyists practised in,
not hefty bound tomes.
59. The Great Commentary: (Arabic al-Tafsir al-Kabir) a typical enough title
for works of this kind. Such commentary and scholarly apparatus were
commonly added in a small tight hand in different colours in the margins
of a Qur’an copy.
60. tenth and fifth parts: The Qur’an consists of 114 chapters (or suras),
which are divided into thirty sections (ajza’), which can be combined to
form tenths (three sections) or fifths (six sections), both of which are
standard units used in the recitation of the texts on ritual occasions.
61. that same day: 25 July 1104, the day of the battle with Ibn Mula’ib when
Usama’s father was wounded in his hand. To distinguish the two
individuals involved, in what follows I have translated the Arabic term
mawla as both ‘lord’ (for the king Ridwan) and as ‘master’ (for ‘Izz al-
Dawla Nasr).
62. Ridwan: Ridwan ibn Tutush was the Seljuk lord of Aleppo from 1095 to
1113. He is not to be confused with the adventurous Egyptian vizier al-
Afdal Ridwan, whose tragic fate Usama relates in Part I.
63. All servants and subjects: The text reads al-ghilman wa-awlad al-hilal,
that is, servants born of servile status as well as people born free.
64. back in the days of my father: That is, in the days of Tutush, Seljuk lord
of Aleppo from 1078 to 1095.
65. Instead, Sham’un told him: Note that Sham’un does not tell him the story
he wishes to hear (Usama tells it below), but instead the story of his saving
his master just a few days prior.
66. Sadid al-Mulk ‘Ali: Usama’s grandfather, the conqueror and first lord of
Shayzar.
67. my uncle ‘Izz al-Dawla: Usama is mistaken here. ‘Izz al-Dawla was the
title of his uncle Nasr (d. 1098) and appears in the previous anecdote. He
probably means his uncle Sultan, who bore the similar title, ‘Izz al-Din.
68. Tall Milh: Tall Milh (‘Salt Hill’) is a small hill about 6 km to the west of
Shayzar.
69. I, just a youth: This was perhaps an incursion by Count Bertrand of
Tripoli in the summer of 1110, so Usama would have been about fifteen
(see Vie, pp. 86–7).
70. the dyke: Usama calls it al-sakr, a low retaining wall presumably
intended to hold back the waters of the Orontes during flooding. From the
statement of his father, it seems it extended from the walls of the lower
town, so Usama could use it to mount the walls safely.
71. ones that rise and set: Of course, all stars rise and set. He is perhaps
referring to constellations, which rise and set as distinctive groupings, and
provided at least a foundation for astrology and navigation. Note too that
Usama expresses misgivings about astrology that were common (but
certainly not universal) among the pious of his day.
72. gate… opened: Medieval city gates were invariably closed at night.
73. What’s the name of this here town?: The Arabic reads Ayyu shay’in ismu
hadha al-balad. This is a good example of one of Usama’s colloquialisms
that has been ‘Classicized’.
74. And we turned… choke-hold… save him, though: The original text
indicates that ‘one of them took the head of Jum’a under his armpit’ – this
is exactly how Usama describes a similar hold used in another context in
Part I, during the massacres of the Fatimid royal family. Hitti and Samarrai
(p. 80) both change the Arabic to make it ‘the son of Jum’a’ in the Frank’s
choke-hold, presumably because they assume Mahmud had been killed.
But there is no evidence to prove such a conclusion.
75. overlooks the plaza… that road: Usama’s description still matches the
topography of the town of Apamea today, which is accessible only via a
winding road overlooking a broad open area or plaza (Arabic maydan).
76. cap on his head: The cap was a qalansuwa, a thick quilted cap, almost a
form of soft armour.
77. Mayhap the body is cured by illness: Here Usama quotes a verse of the
poet al-Mutanabbi (d. 955).
78. Dhakhirat al-Dawla Hittan: Hitti reads this cousin’s name as ‘Khitam’,
but this is surely the Dhakhirat al-Dawla Hittan ibn Munqidh known from
other sources as a prominent amir later in the days of Saladin. The two
names look nearly identical in unpointed Arabic script.
79. You may dislike something though it is good for you: Qur’an 2:216.
80. Upper Mesopotamia: (Arabic al-Jazira) northern Iraq, where Mosul is,
and which served as the primary base of operations for Zangi (‘the
atabeg’).
81. He had come with me into exile: The text reads wa-qad tagharrab ma’i.
That is, Ghunaym came with Usama from Shayzar. In the surviving text of
the book, this is one of Usama’s few references to his expulsion. Cf. Hitti
(Memoirs, p. 88), ‘kept me company on my sojourns in foreign lands’.
82. Basahra’ Castle: Hitti (Memoirs, p. 89) reads ‘Bashamra’, a castle in
northern Syria. But it seems a locality in Upper Mesopotamia is intended
and so, following Gibb (p. 1007), I suggest Basahra’, near Mosul.
83. I saw the austringer… French Moult: The text reads baziyar, often
translated ‘falconer’, but as the birds in questions are goshawks (Arabic
baz), a hawk-handler or austringer is intended. In falconry, French Moult
(Arabic hass) is a blanket term used to describe any ailment that would
cause a bird to moult out of season or grow misshapen feathers.
84. francolin: (Arabic durraj) Francolinus francolinus, a tasty partridge-like
bird that favours marshes.
85. climbed up on the mill: The Orontes River (which does indeed contain a
few small islands along its course) fed a number of water-wheels on its
banks, some used for milling grain, others for propelling water into
irrigation-works. A few examples, primarily of Ottoman origin, can still be
seen on the Orontes today (where children climb on them as a diving
platform, not unlike the archers described here).
86. man of courage: Usama calls him rajulan shuja’an, a play on the man’s
title, Shuja’ al-Dawla, ‘Courage of the State’.
87. Sarhank… Khutlukh: All prominent local amirs. Sarhank is the same
champion that roused Jum’a’s sense of honour in another encounter that
Usama described above; Ghazi al-Talli’s last name indicates his place of
origin, but it is not specific: perhaps Syrian Tall Mannas or Mesopotamian
Tall Bashir (Frankish Turbessel); Khutlukh bears a Seljuk title of Persian
origin (sipah-salar), commander.
88. leading down to al-Jalali: Hitti (Memoirs, p. 92, n. 73) says that the
Jalali is a tributary of the Orontes, but I have not been able to confirm this
independently – there are certainly no major tributaries in the vicinity of
Shayzar. Thus, one assumes that, to Hitti, the Jalali Mill mentioned above
was named after the river. But the mill is far more likely to have been
named after its builder, a local ruler with a title like Jalal al-Din or Jalal al-
Dawla (a good candidate is an old ruler of Aleppo, Jalal al-Dawla Nasr, r.
1074–6). If that is the case, then the mill is once again meant here and not a
tributary.
89. went down: Hitti (Memoirs, p. 92) has misunderstood the topography
here: the horseman finds himself ‘ala shafir al-wadi, which is at the side of
a canyon (i.e., the Orontes Valley), as with a bank of a river, not ‘on the
very edge of a precipice’. Usama’s point is that the horseman falls, but
finds himself on the side of the canyon convenient to his comrades’
location at the Jalali Mill (with the cattle), and so goes down to them in
safety.
90. Bandar-Qanin: Location unknown. The word bandar, however, is of
Persian origin, meaning town, especially a market-town.
91. projecting window: The window is called a rawshan, a Persian term used
to describe the projecting bay-windows that are often covered with
intricately carved wooden screens or mashrabiyat.
92. Bohemond’s son: Usama simply calls him Ibn Maymun, that is,
Bohemond II, Frankish lord of Antioch (r. 1126–30), and son of Bohemond
of Taranto.
93. Rabiyat al-Qaramita: ‘Carmathian Height’. The Carmathians, or
Qaramita, were an extremist Shi’ite sect prominent in the history of Syria
during the tenth century.
94. Banias… Damascus: The town of Banias, located at the head of the
Jordan River, was captured by the Franks in 1140. It was well known for
these surrounding woods, which Ibn al-Qalanisi (Ta’rikh, p. 520) mentions
as the subject of Frankish raiding. Banias should not be confused with the
Syrian coastal town of the same name, conventionally spelled Baniyas. The
truce between Frankish Jerusalem and Burid Damascus, for which Usama
was to some degree responsible, was settled in 1139, while Usama served
the Burid atabeg Mu’in al-Din (1138–44).
95. Fulk, son of Fulk: Fulk V, count of Anjou, Touraine and Maine, and King
of Jerusalem (r. 1131–43) by virtue of his marriage to Queen Melisende.
96. Tancred: Usama calls him Dankari. He was a nephew of Bohemond of
Taranto and served as his regent over Antioch almost continuously from
1101 to 1112.
97. noble horse of the Khafaja: The Khafaja was a largely nomadic Arab
tribe of Syria whose horses were greatly prized.
98. serjents: Usama represents the French term in Arabic as sarjand.
99. Badrahu: Derenbourg transcribes this as ‘Badrhawa’, but the long alif at
the end of this name is not a letter, but an example of alif al-wiqaya, a
mark used to prevent a final letter waw from being misread as the word for
‘and’. I have transcribed the name accordingly. Either way, it is difficult to
interpret. On the basis of his reading, Derenbourg (Vie, p. 57, n. 2)
suggests ‘Pedrovant’, but my reading suggests a simple ‘Pedro’ will do.
100. water: The Orontes River.
101. Yahya ibn Safi Left-Hand: The man’s epithet is al-A’sar, ‘the Left-
Handed’, or, possibly, ‘the Unlucky’.
102. al-Ruj: This name, variously applied by different texts to a district,
valley, castle or town, has caused no end of grief to medievalists.
Fortunately, Dussaud (pp. 165–70) seems to have sorted it all out. In this
instance, Usama means the vast and rugged district south and west of
Aleppo.
103. Mawdud: The isbasalar Sharaf al-Din Mawdud was the Seljuk governor
of Mosul and the commander of the sultan’s armies sent against the Franks.
104. The right thing… our tents and baggage: The point here is that
Mawdud’s original camp on the river was exposed, so he is enjoined to set
up tents wherever he can behind the safety of Shayzar’s walls (and not ‘on
the roofs of the lower town’, as Hitti, Memoirs, p. 97, bizarrely puts it).
105. Tall al-Turmusi… Tall al-Tulul: Tall al-Turmusi (‘Lupin Mound’) is to
be identified with the ‘Termeise’ mentioned by Dussaud (p. 208), about 6
km downstream from Shayzar. Tall al-Tulul (‘Hilly Mound’) is located just
north of Tall al-Turmusi. Tall al-Milh, mentioned in a battle above, is also
quite nearby, suggesting that this area, a broad triangular plain on the north
bank of the Orontes, was a common battlefield for Shayzar’s armies. These
mounds, it should be noted, are common features of the Syrian landscape,
often the ruin-mounds of ancient, now-deserted settlements.
106. one of our Bedouin troops: Hitti (Memoirs, p. 99), reading min al-
maghrib, has ‘one of our combatants from al-Maghrib [Mauretania]’, and
likewise Miquel (p. 191). But Samarrai’s reading (p. 92) of min al-’arab,
‘from among the Arab tribesmen’, is surely correct, given that the man’s
father (as revealed below) was a camel-merchant living in
Tadmur/Palmyra.
107. Palmyra: Known in Arabic as Tadmur, Palmyra is an ancient caravan
city whose superb ruins still dominate their verdant oasis in the heart of the
Syrian desert, about 240 km northeast of Damascus – a journey long
enough to suggest the value of eight camels.
108. saw something… described to him: This is Usama’s polite way of
saying she was ugly.
109. Another example… in the year 565: This was during the period when
Usama was serving under Qara Arslan, lord of Hisn Kayfa, in Diyar Bakr,
in Upper Mesopotamia. The poet al-Mu’ayyad al-Baghdadi was a minor
man of letters (d. 1202), and so probably a young man when he related this
story to the old warrior-poet Usama.
110. young toughs: The narrator calls them ‘ayyarun. They are addressed
below as fityan (literally, ‘youths’), which I have rendered with the Turk’s
overly familiar ‘boys’ and shabab (‘young men’). These terms suggest that
these are the sort of young men often found in cities and towns of the
medieval Near East, who formed semi-official gangs or militias. They
frequently took upon themselves the defence of their cities and the
‘protection’ of their neighbourhoods.
111. Turkish attendant… bag: The term used to describe the Turk is ghulam,
which probably indicates that we are dealing with a Turkish soldier of
slave origin, a mamluk. His charge, the girl, is referred to as a jariya, a
female domestic servant or slave, and evidently one in service to a wealthy
household. The saddle-bag (khurj) must have been a large bundle, since the
Turk later asks for help unloading it.
112. al-Anbar: A town in Iraq on the Euphrates, some 80 km to the west of
Baghdad.
113. Pfft: By this explosive interjection, I attempt to convey the scatological
onomatopoeia of the Arabic verb used here, darata, meaning both ‘to
scoff’ and ‘to fart’.
114. Bursuq… by order of the sultan: Bursuq was named commander
(isbasalar) by the Seljuk sultan Muhammad I, replacing Maw-dud, whom
Usama mentions earlier. This campaign took place in September 1115.
115. prominent amirs: The names of some of these commanders deserve
some notice. The Commander of the Armies (amir al-juyush) Uzbeh is also
known in other sources by the roughly equivalent appellation of Juyush-
Bek. Usama is confused about Sunqur Diraz (‘Sunqur the Tall’ in Persian):
he is not lord of al-Rahba, but the similarly named Aq-Sunqur (in Turkish
‘White Falcon’) was. As Aq-Sunqur was a mamluk of Bursuq’s, it is
probably this latter man that was present, and not Sunqur Diraz. The Zangi
mentioned here is not to be confused with Usama’s first patron, the mighty
atabeg Zangi. This Zangi is a mere commander, a brother of Bursuq.
Finally, Isma’il al-Bakji (in Persian ‘Isma’il the Grand’), known from other
sources, is a correction on Hitti’s part: Usama or the scribe had misread the
name as ‘al-Balkhi’.
116. Theophilos: As a Theophilos (Arabic Thiyufil) is mentioned below as
the Frankish lord of Kafartab some nine years earlier, Hitti reads his name
here too, though it could also be Manwil, Manuel. In either case, his name
suggests that he is a Greek rather than a Frank.
117. entered the fosse and began digging a tunnel: In preparation for sapping
the walls, discussed in detail below. Khurasan was a region of the Seljuk
sultanate, comprising northeastern Iran and Afghanistan. The fosse (Arabic
khandaq) was the defensive trench dug outside the city walls.
118. barbican… tower: Both ‘barbican’ and ‘tower’ refer to the same
structure in this account, though Usama seems to use the term ‘barbican’
(Arabic bashura) to refer specifically to the outer entrance of this structure,
a structure which in its entirety is a ‘tower’ (burj).
119. inner wall remained as it was: That is, they had hoped to damage the
inner curtain-wall of the citadel, but instead only collapsed the outer walls
of the barbican-tower that extended from the curtain. The main defensive
wall remained an obstacle.
120. reached its highest point: That is, by climbing the rubble of the outer
barbican-tower walls, the infantry are able to climb over the inner curtain-
wall and assault the citadel.
121. on the parapet between the two tower walls: This is a somewhat vague
phrase, badan min haytan al-burj. Other sources of the era use badan to
describe stretches of city wall. As the top of a wall, connected somehow to
the two walls of the damaged barbican-tower, is describe here, and as
badan means, literally, a coat of armour, I assume some sort of defensive
outcropping on top of the barbican is intended, perhaps what is known as a
‘hoarding’ in the West or a machicolation of some kind.
122. naphtha: This highly flammable substance was used as a grenadelike
weapon in ‘naphtha-pots’ by ground troops, as well as in naval combat as
in the famous ‘Greek fire’.
123. doubled hauberk: In fact, probably just two hauberks (Arabic
zardiyatayn) at once, a common practice in the West as well.
124. But the Turk… spear had been: The Arabic is perplexingly pronominal:
wa-masha ila al-ifranji wa-qad dakhala ‘ala al-rumh ilayhi. Having
knocked the spear aside with his shield, the Turk steps into the Frank’s
zone of attack before he can recover.
125. like a man at prayer: The text reads ka’l-raki’, i.e., like a Muslim at
prayer, which would also suggest he had his hands held at his head.
126. al-Sayyid al-Sharif: This amir, presumably one of Bursuq’s men, has
not yet been identified.
127. Danith: A small town between Aleppo and Kafartab. The following
reference is to the first Battle of Danith, a serious Muslim defeat.
128. Lu’lu’ the Eunuch: Lu’lu’ al-Khadim, also known as al-Yaya (Turkish
yaya, infantryman), became effective lord of Aleppo after the death of
Ridwan ibn Tutush in 1113 until his own death in 1118. Cf. Hitti (Memoirs,
p. 105, n. 109), where his date of accession is incorrectly given as 1117,
and he is called ‘Badr al-Din’. This was in fact the title of another Lu’lu’,
the atabeg of Mosul, in the thirteenth century, and last of the Zangids.
129. lord of Antioch: Roger (Arabic Rujar) of Salerno (r. 1112–19).
130. Commander of the Armies: That is, the amir al-Juyush Uzbeh, whom
Bursuq sent to Aleppo as a result of Lu’lu’’s ruse.
131. one of the three men… mentioned earlier: Evidently in the opening
portion of the text that is missing from the manuscript. This is a reference
to the assault on Shayzar by the Nizari ‘Assassins’ in the spring of 1114.
132. Chief Sahri: By ‘Chief’ I translate the title ra’is, which, despite Hitti’s
claim (Memoirs, p. 107, n. 112), is not a menial title as it was in Hitti’s
post-Ottoman context, but a title indicating a ruler’s local headman through
whom he governed the local populace. In large cities like Damascus, the
ra’is was often one of the most powerful men in the city.
133. Hisn al-Khurayba: ‘Fort Stoneheap’. This may well be the same place
as the Burj al-Khurayba (‘Stoneheap Tower’) that Usama mentions
elsewhere.
134. Yunan: This Yunan (or Jonas) is, like Chief Sahri above, called ‘Chief’
(Arabic ra’is, actually colloquial rayyis). As such, Yunan is not a
‘muleteer’, as Hitti (Memoirs, p. 108) calls him, but a neighbourhood
headman in Frankish Tripoli, as his authority over the robber-gang, whom
he calls ‘boys’ (Arabic fityan), may also indicate. He is described as a
‘Nasrani’, a term that is typically used to denote native Christians.
135. Mount Sinai: (Arabic al-Tur) the rustic province of Sinai was Fatimid
Egypt’s easternmost frontier. As Rotter (p. 100, n. 20) points out, the text
should be corrected here, as the original Arabic reads min Misr, ‘from
Egypt’. I have rearranged a few of Usama’s sentences here for the sake of
clarity.
136. The son of the governor… story: This anecdote, and the few that follow
it, are classic examples of the genre of tales known as ‘Relief after
Misfortune’ stories (al-faraj ba’da al-shidda – Usama uses these very
words), a popular genre in medieval Arabic literature to which whole
books were devoted.
137. I used to travel… Fulk: Jamal al-Din Muhammad was Burid lord of
Damascus from 1139 to 1140, though real power was held by Usama’s
patron, the amir Mu’in al-Din. The truce with the Kingdom of Jerusalem
under King Fulk V that Usama mentions was a product of Mu’in al-Din
and Usama’s efforts and began in early 1140. See Cobb, pp. 28–30. The
Baldwin mentioned here is King Baldwin II, father of Fulk’s wife, Queen
Melisende. As Usama clarifies below, the favour Baldwin owed Usama’s
father was connected to his stay at Shayzar in 1123 as a hostage after being
captured in battle.
138. William Jiba: Usama calls him Kilyam Jiba. The man is otherwise
unknown and his surname is conjectural. As Usama clarifies below, the
setting of all this is the city of Acre.
139. Acre: (Arabic ‘Akka) chief port of the Latin Kingdom of Jerusalem.
After its capture in 1104, it attracted the commercial interests of the major
Western maritime powers. It was an ideal base for someone like William
Jiba.
140. The amir Qara Arslan… Amid: Qara Arslan (‘Black Lion’) was lord of
Hisn Kayfa in the province of Diyar Bakr, which straddled Upper
Mesopotamia and eastern Anatolia. Amid, its historic capital city, is now
known by the name of its former province: Diyarbakr, in eastern Turkey.
Qara Arslan was a member of the Artuqid (or Urtuqid) dynasty, a long-
lived and far-flung family of Turkish warlords. Usama was in Artuqid
service from 1164 to 1174, composed many of his works and may have
started the present one there. See Cobb, pp. 49–56.
141. Yaruq: The servant is said to be ifranji (Frankish) but his name is
Turkish.
142. Kamal al-Din ‘Ali ibn Nisan: Ibn Nisan was technically the vizier of
Amid, but he in fact held real power in the city. In cities of the era, al-
baladiya indicates the locally raised militia of the town and not ‘the
inhabitants’, as Hitti (Memoirs, p. 113) and Miquel (p. 213) have it.
143. Bridge Fortress… tribe: The Bridge Fortress (Arabic Hisn al-Jisr) is the
Gistrum of Frankish sources. It was a small fort, built by the Banu
Munqidh, housing a local garrison at the bridge across the Orontes, just
below Shayzar. The Banu Kinana were an Arab tribe of ancient
prominence. The Banu Munqidh were a clan of this same tribe. Ibn al-
Ahmar (Red’s Son) is otherwise unknown.
144. Kafarnabudha: This village (known now as Kafarnaboudi) lies between
Shayzar and Kafartab.
145. as mice seek out those wounded by leopards: On the belief that mice
had a peculiar attraction to leopard-wounds, see below.
146. A digression: Usama also tells this story in his collection Lubab (p.
101).
147. Ibn al-Munira: Born in Kafartab, Ibn al-Munira later settled in Shayzar,
probably fleeing the Frankish capture of his town during the First Crusade.
He was a respected grammarian and religious scholar (d. 1110). Thus,
Usama would have been younger than fifteen years old at the time of this
conversation.
148. Judge’s Mosque: This reading is based upon the version of this story in
Usama’s collection Lubab (p. 199), which reads Masjid al-Qadi.
149. The Franks… Banias… patriarch: It is not clear exactly which siege of
Banias is intended here, but by context the patriarch can be identified as
William, patriarch of Jerusalem.
150. contrasting example: Usama relates this account in his collection Lubab
(p. 199).
151. Zahr al-Dawla… elegant frame: The man’s title means ‘Flower of the
State’, hence Usama’s reference to the man’s ‘elegant frame’.
152. He then told him the purpose of his journey: But he does not, to our
frustration, tell Usama.
153. Fadl ibn Abi al-Hayja’… Abu al-Hayja’: As Usama clarifies, his source
Fadl is the son of the Kurdish lord of Irbil, Abu al-Hayja’, who is the
ultimate source of this account. Irbil is a town in Upper Mesopotamia,
about 80 km east of Mosul.
154. sultan Malikshah… amir Ibn Marwan: Malikshah was sultan of the
Seljuk dynasty from 1072 to 1092. We are dealing here with a story from
an older generation. The Kurdish Marwanid dynasty controlled much of
Diyar Bakr in the tenth and eleventh centuries before losing their lands to
the Seljuks. The reference here is probably to Malikshah’s first visit to
Syria in 1082, meaning the ‘Ibn Marwan’ in this account is the amir
Mansur (d. 1096).
155. Khilat: Also known as Akhlat, this is a fortified town at the northwest
corner of Lake Van in Armenia. During the twelfth century, the region was
governed by the Turkoman Shah-i Arman (‘King of Armenia’) dynasty.
The account here describes Zangi’s betrothal to the daughter of the ruler
Suqman al-Qutbi, whose widow, Inanj Khatun, seized power from
Suqman’s ineffectual son Ibrahim in 1128.
156. Bitlis: (Arabic Badlis) a town about 25 km southwest of Lake Van, not
far from Khilat, in eastern Anatolia. With the Seljuk conquest of the region
in 1084, the city was granted to a Turkish commander, Muhammad ibn
Dilmaj, whose descendants ruled until 1192. It is not certain which Ibn
Dilmaj is intended here. These events took place in 1131.
157. training-grounds: A maydan is an open plaza generally used for
equestrian drills and training. They were a common feature of the horse-
warrior cities of the medieval Near East, almost always extramural, as
seems to be the case here.
158. Malik ibn Salim: One of the last of the ‘Uqaylid dynasty, a clan of
Bedouin origin that once controlled most of northern Syria and
Mesopotamia. After the Seljuk conquests, their domains became ever more
circumscribed in marginal areas of Mesopotamia, such as al-Raqqa and al-
Qal’a (a short form of Qal’at Ja’bar, ‘The Citadel of Ja’bar’). These nearby
towns of the middle Euphrates are a little more than halfway between
Aleppo and the modern city of Deir ez-Zor. The impressive ruins of the
castle at al-Qal’a can still be seen, though where once they dominated the
river plain, they now occupy an artificial peninsula in Lake Assad.
159. Joscelin: (Arabic Juslin) Joscelin of Courtenay, lord of Tall Bashir and
soon to be named count of Edessa. The events described here took place in
1120 or 1121.
160. The atabeg… had assembled in Apamea: This was during the massive
offensive of 1115 ordered by the Seljuk sultan. Tugh-dakin (or Tughtakin)
was the atabeg of Damascus. His descendants ruled after him as the Burid
dynasty. Fearing his autonomy in Syria would be lost in the process of a
Seljuk campaign against the Franks, he, along with Il-Ghazi, the Artuqid
lord of Mardin (in Upper Mesopotamia), made common cause with the
Franks of Antioch (themselves assisted by Tripoli, Edessa and Jerusalem)
and repulsed the Seljuk army at Danith.
161. I myself have witnessed…: Usama included another version of this
anecdote in his Kitab al-’Asa, ed. Hasan ‘Abbas (Alexandria: al-Hay’a al-
Misriya al-’Amma li’l-Kitab, 1978), pp. 337–8.
162. Mahmud ibn Salih: Mirdasid ruler of Aleppo (1060–74). The ascetic
Usama is describing in 1138 must therefore be a descendant of one of that
ruler’s muwallads, rather than one himself.
163. Constantinople: (Arabic al-Qunstantiniya) capital of the Byzantine
empire.
164. Franks attacked us on the road from Egypt: A reference to the attack at
al-Muwaylih, in Jordan, described in Part I. Usama survived the assault,
but his patron, the disgraced vizier ‘Abbas, was killed. His son Nasr (called
here Nasr al-Kabir) was not killed during the battle but only after he had
been ransomed back to the new ruler of Egypt.
165. unable to walk: One must recall here that Usama was gravely injured
during his flight from Egypt. Usama refers to his poor horse here as ikdish,
a colloquial term of Persian origin meaning ‘mixed breed’, but used (as
kadish) to describe a nag or workhorse.
166. Hayzan: Also Layzan, a town in Sharwan province in the eastern
Caucasus, near the Caspian Sea. The narrator seems to have been
imprisoned during a conflict with the local Muslim lord of the place,
perhaps during the Seljuk invasion of Sharwan beginning in 1118.
167. Companions of the Prophet: The generation of pious men who were
contemporaries of the Prophet Muhammad. Their exemplary behaviour is
as much a guide to proper Islamic conduct as is the Prophet’s.
168. Frankish king of the Germans… marched on Damascus: Though it is
hard to tell from this account, this is a reference to the Second Crusade and
the ill-fated Frankish assault on Damascus in July 1148. The king of the
Germans (malik al-Alman) was Conrad III (note that he is, like anyone
hailing from Europe, described as a ‘Frank’), whom Usama makes the
leader of the Crusade, ignoring Louis VII of France.
169. most virtuous of all Muslims: The story of these two men was a
favourite of Muslim chroniclers of the era. Indeed, al-Findalawi, a jurist
(faqih) of the Maliki school of Islamic law, became something of a local
hero.
170. cavalier: The man’s name, Faris, means, literally, ‘horseman, cavalier,
knight’.
171. Asfuna: A small fortress near Ma’arrat al-Nu’man that had once
belonged to the Banu Munqidh.
172. Fakhr al-Mulk ibn ‘Ammar: The independent ruler of Tripoli, who was
ousted when the Franks captured the city in 1109. After passing through as
an exile to Shayzar, Damascus and Baghdad, he took power near Tripoli in
the town of Jabala as described here. See Kamil, 11:152–4.
173. Shihab al-Din… Tall Mujahid: Yaghisiyani and his son Ahmad,
governor of Hama, are also mentioned in Usama’s account of his return to
Shayzar in 1138 during the joint Byzantine-Frankish siege in Part I. Shihab
al-Din Mahmud reigned as lord of Damascus (1135–9). Tall Mujahid
(‘Holy-Warrior Mound’) is unidentified, but it would appear to be in the
vicinity of Hama.
174. Ghazi al-Talli: Described in another anecdote above as a prominent
amir. My translation of what follows differs significantly from Hitti
(Memoirs, p. 128) and is inspired largely by Gibb (pp. 1008–9).
175. The battle was between them and… Malik ibn Salim: The opponents of
the Banu Numayr tribe here are minor princes of the ‘Uqaylid dynasty. The
events described here took place in 1107–8.
176. Darayya: One of the villages of the Ghuta, the oasis that surrounds
Damascus.
177. left Baalbek… service of the atabeg: In effect, the lord of Baalbek, a
member of the Burid dynasty, has joined forces with Zangi to make war on
his own brother, the Burid lord of Damascus.
178. Dumayr: A little village with a fort, probably of Roman origin, just to
the north of Damascus, clearly visible on the road to Palmyra today. Usama
gives a valuable clue about the slowness of troop movements here: the
army left Darayya in the Ghuta in ‘the early part of the night’ and was only
a short distance north of Damascus at Dumayr when morning broke.
179. Sharuf: This would appear to be a tributary of the Orontes from this
description, and is undoubtedly to be identified with the River Sarut that
debouches into the river between Hama and Shayzar.
180. Mahmud ibn Qaraja… Khir-Khan ibn Qaraja: The brothers Mahmud
and Khir-Khan ibn Qaraja were lords of Hama and Homs respectively,
owing allegiance (technically) to the Seljuk sultan.
181. compound spears: Comprised of rumh-spears rather than the quntariya-
style spear.
182. Baldwin, king of the Franks… Timurtash: Baldwin II, count of Edessa
(r. 1100–118) and King of Jerusalem (r. 1118–31), was captured in battle in
1123 and was released, after passing through many hands, with the
intercession of Usama’s uncle Sultan (see Ibn al-’Adim, Zubda, 2:22, and
Cobb, pp. 15–16). Timurtash (d. 1154) was the Artuqid ruler of the city of
Mardin. In 1124, he took control of Aleppo, where Baldwin was being held
prisoner.
183. the Bridge: That is, Hisn al-Jisr, the ‘Bridge Fortress’, the small fortress
at the bridge that crossed the Orontes just below Shayzar.
184. God… made His creatures of various sorts: An allusion to Qur’an
71:13.
185. an omen may employ speech as its agent: The text reads wa’l-fa’l
muwakkil bi’l-mantiq, a phrase that perplexed Hitti (Memoirs, p. 135: ‘a
good omen is superior to logic’) and Miquel (see his intricate note 18, p.
244); Rotter (p. 125) chose to drop it altogether. But the language is
straight out of the lexicon of commerce: it refers to the anecdote preceding
it, in which Muhasin says he will be stung, and so is stung, fulfilling the
omen.
186. Sabiq ibn Waththab: Sabiq ibn Waththab ibn Mahmud ibn Salih, one of
the surviving children of Waththab ibn Mahmud, a member of the Mirdasid
dynasty of Aleppo and northern Syria, who played a prominent role in that
dynasty’s downfall on the eve of the First Crusade. Waththab survived the
downfall of his family and he and his sons became minor lords in northern
Syria.
187. In those grasslands: (Arabic al-ghalfa’) not a ‘thicket of brambles’ as
Hitti (Memoirs, p. 135) has it (cf. Miquel, p. 245: fourré), but ungrazed
lands abounding in various kinds of herbage. The man’s fear of entering a
wide open space hiding a lion is thus very understandable.
188. horse-herdsman: The text reads juban al-khayl, horse-herdsman, an
adaptation of the Turkish chuban, herdsman.
189. table-master: The title is Persian khawan-salar – effectively the servant
in charge of the kitchen.
190. took to circling the pool: This residence, like many traditional homes in
the region today, is a building with rooms leading off an interior courtyard
with a pool, fountain or cistern in the centre.
191. it was granted a full pardon: The text reads ‘utiqa dhalika al-khuruf
min al-dhabh. Usama uses the legalese of granting a slave freedom for
humorous effect here.
192. senile old fool: Following Samarrai (p. 129), I read the word in question
as al-mufannid, a weak-minded man or liar, someone whose word cannot
be trusted. The reference (as Hitti, Memoirs, p. 137, n. 13, notes) might be
to the leader of the Nizari ‘Assassin’ sect, the famous ‘Old Man of the
Mountain’, whose headquarters was at Masyaf, in the mountains west of
Shayzar, and for whom Usama had no great love. Hitti’s reading, al-
mu’abbad, ‘the one worshipped’, seems redundant given the rest of
Usama’s condemnation. Then again, it may be a reference to the leader
(Arabic muqaddam) of the adherents of various sects in the Wadi al-Taym
area around Baalbek, described by Ibn al-Qalanisi (Ta’rikh, pp. 351–2) and
Ibn al-Athir (Kamil, 10:656).
193. Latakia once belonged to my uncle: As Usama’s uncle Nasr became
lord of Shayzar in 1082, and as Latakia was lost to the Banu Munqidh in
1086, these events must have taken place in that interval, some ten years
before Usama’s birth. The brothers in question then will have been old
retainers of his household when they related the tale.
194. Ma’arzaf: A village with a small fort about 15 km southwest of
Shayzar.
195. Hunak: A village about 35 km northeast of Shayzar, just off the modern
road to Ma’arrat al-Nu’man.
196. landlord: The text uses the Arabic muqta’, i.e., in Western terms, he
holds the village as fief.
197. holy-warrior leopard: The text reads al-namir al-mujahid, the leopard
who goes on jihad.
198. Qadmus… Banu Muhriz: Qadmus was a fortress in the Jabal Ansariye
which later was captured by the Nizaris. The Banu Muhriz were one of the
many local families that held small principalities in the region in the early
twelfth century.
199. variety of wild beast called a tiger… ibn Zafar: Usama uses the
accepted term for tiger, babr. Though not unknown to medieval Muslim
zoologists, the tiger was considered something of a natural wonder (and
rightly so). There are, of course, no tigers in Africa, so it is not clear what
his informant, Ibn Zafar, actually saw. Ibn Zafar was a well-travelled man-
of-letters, born in Sicily, raised in Mecca and settled and died in Hama in
1170 (see Siyar, 20:522–3).
200. weighing twenty or twenty-five ratls: As a unit of weight, the ratl varied
slightly over time and space. In late medieval Egypt, the ratl was
equivalent to about 434 grams or about a pound. In Syria, the ratl was
slightly heavier. Even still, these are payloads that could inflict serious
damage.
201. The Franks March on Damascus: This sub-heading, the only one of its
kind, appears in the margin of the manuscript. It was probably added by the
copyist.
202. The Franks… march on Damascus and capture it: This is the
‘Damascus Crusade’ of Baldwin II in 1129. Bohemond II of Antioch had
captured Kafartab in 1127.
203. lord of Edessa and Tall Bashir… Antioch: Edessa (Arabic al-Ruha) was
the centre of a short-lived Crusader principality on the Upper Euphrates,
some 170 km northeast of Aleppo. Both Edessa and nearby Tall Bashir
(Frankish Turbessel) were controlled by Joscelin I. Antioch was ruled at
the time by Roger of Salerno.
204. burgesses: Usama uses the word al-burjasiya, a Frankish loanword,
literally, bourgeoisie.
205. Mudhkin: A town near Kafartab.
206. public wailer at our funerals: Ritual wailing was a commonly accepted
public role for old women in many cultures of the ancient and medieval
Mediterranean.
207. blow of the mangonel-stone upon that old man’s head: Usama refers
here to the anecdote above about the mangonels at the Byzantine siege of
Shayzar; he is returning to this sub-section’s main theme of wondrous
blows.
208. attempt on the citadel of Shayzar: Usama refers here to the attack on
Shayzar by the Nizari Isma’ili ‘Assassins’ in 1114.
209. The Batini: Usama uses this term as a synonym for the Nizari Isma’ilis,
because of their belief that the Qur’an possesses an inner esoteric truth
(batin) known only to an elect few.
210. Abu Qubays Castle: Located in the mountains west of Shayzar. As we
shall see, this Iftikhar al-Dawla was an ally of Usama’s uncle Sultan.
211. brief exposition by way of introduction: Usama seems to have got
carried away with his long and detailed ‘brief exposition’ here, which is
really just intended as background to explain the presence of Bohemond II
and the Franks in his story about the witch Burayka, below.
212. Roger: Usama calls him Rujar, i.e., Roger of Salerno (r. 1112–19).
213. Baldwin the Prince: Usama calls him Baghdawin al-Bruns, i.e.,
Baldwin II, King of Jerusalem (r. 1118–31). The epithet might also be read
al-ru’ayyis, ‘the little chief’.
214. Danith… 14 August 1119: In fact, Usama has his chronology and
geography confused. Roger met his death at the ‘Field of Blood’ or ager
sanguinis, at al-Balat, not nearby Danith, and on 28 June 1119, not 14
August. In fact, there were two battles at Danith, the first being a less-
renowned Muslim defeat that took place in 1115, as Usama relates above.
The second, more famous ‘Battle of Danith’ of 14 August is the battle
between Il-Ghazi and Baldwin II that Usama describes below. Moreover, it
should be said, this second Battle of Danith was not ‘a draw’ as he later
states, but a victory for Baldwin II.
215. Robert, the lord of Sahyun, Balatunus: This is Robert FitzFulk ‘the
Leper’, an Antiochene nobleman and lord of Sardana. Sahyun (Frankish
Saone) is an ancient and imposing castle high in the mountains east of
Latakia, now known as Qal’at Salah al-Din (‘Saladin’s Castle’). The castle
of Balatunus lies just to the south of Sahyun.
216. when the army of the East arrived under Bursuq: A reference to the
great Seljuk campaign against a Frankish-Muslim coalition in 1115. After
the initial furore of the First Crusade, such alliances between Muslim rulers
and Frankish lords were quite common.
217. After Balak was killed, Baldwin came into the possession of Timurtash:
Nur al-Dawla Balak was the nephew of the aforementioned Il-Ghazi. He
had captured Baldwin II in battle in April 1123. Baldwin changed hands a
few times before being ransomed, thanks to the intervention of the Banu
Munqidh of Shayzar. Balak died in 1124. His cousin Timurtash had
succeeded Il-Ghazi as lord of Aleppo in 1122.
218. exempted us from paying it: A reference to the annual tribute imposed
by Tancred of Antioch upon Shayzar since 1110.
219. al-Suwaydiya: The port of Antioch.
220. son of Bohemond: Usama calls him Ibn Maymun. This is Bohemond II,
son and heir of Bohemond of Taranto, founder of the Principality of
Antioch. He arrived to take his throne in October 1126, when he was only
seventeen or eighteen years old.
221. illicit profit… stipend by which he was employed: A hypersensitive
concern over the licitness of one’s livelihood was a distinctive mark of the
pious in Usama’s time, and money that came from government sources,
with its inevitable ties to oppression and moral compromises, was a prime
target for such attitudes. Usama is lampooning the idea, noting that the man
would rather take money from a witch than from his soldier’s stipend.
222. So I put down my sword: The text reads fa-wada’tu sayfi…; Hitti
(Memoirs, p. 152) oddly has ‘Taking up my sword…’
223. cotton-carders: Al-Dhahabi, Duwwal al-Islam, ed. F. M. Shaltut (Cairo:
al-Hay’a al-Misriya al-’Amma li’l-Kitab, 1974), 2:31, notes that the
community of Isma’ilis that had settled at Shayzar used to card cotton
there.
224. may God do something with you, and do it again: A polite way of
saying she cursed him roundly.
225. peregrines… zaghariya-hounds: Peregrines (Arabic shahin), Falco
peregrinus, and the lesser-known sakers (Arabic saqr), Falco cherrug, are
varieties of falcons commonly used on the hunt. Cheetahs were quite
frequently used as hunting allies on the ground. Zaghariya-hounds are
hunting-dogs, possibly of European origin.
226. night of Nisf Sha’ban: Sha’ban, the eighth month of the Muslim
calendar, could be marked by additional fasting, remembrance of the dead,
and prayers, especially on the Nisf, or middle day, of the month (as
described here).
227. eyesight like that of Zarqa’ al-Yamama: Zarqa’ al-Yamama was a figure
of Arabian legend, whose eyesight, it is said, allowed her to see three days’
distance away.
228. after Ibn Mula’ib was killed: In 1106, at the hands of Isma’ili assassins.
See Usama’s account in the Lost Fragments from The Book of
Contemplation in Other Excerpts below.
229. Nada al-Sulayhi: Unidentified. His name may also be read ‘Bada’.
230. Rafaniya, which belonged to them at the time: The Franks had taken
Rafaniya in 1126 (see Vie, p. 481, n. 1).
231. manager of his household: The text reads qahramanat darihi, the
highest-ranked female servant.
232. Saruj: In Upper Mesopotamia, southwest of Edessa, conquered by the
Franks in 1101.
233. The ‘Wonders’ of the Frankish Race: Usama makes heavy use of the
word ‘ajiba in his writings, a common term for any marvel or subject that
generates wonder, both positively and negatively. I employ quotation
marks in this section heading to convey this ambiguity.
234. al-Munaytira: A Frankish fortress and town high in the Lebanese
mountains, near Afqa in the north of modern Lebanon.
235. dryness of humours: The text reads nashaf, ‘dryness’. This makes
complete sense given the generally Galenic framework in which physicians
in the medieval Levant operated. Hitti, however, prefers to read this as
Persian nishaf, ‘imbecility’.
236. Their king: Fulk V of Anjou, King of Jerusalem.
237. al-Aqsa Mosque: The main mosque of Jerusalem, located on the Haram
al-Sharif or Temple Mount platform. Under Frankish rule, the Christian
military order of the Templars (Arabic al-dawiya) used the al-Aqsa
Mosque as their headquarters.
238. praying towards Mecca: The text reads ila al-qibla, ‘towards the
[proper] direction of [Muslim] prayer’. In Jerusalem this is due south. In
the Middle Ages, most Christians, following ancient practice, prayed
towards the east.
239. Dome of the Rock: The magnificent domed structure near the centre of
the Haram al-Sharif or Temple Mount platform in Jerusalem, not far from
the al-Aqsa Mosque. The Franks converted it into a church during their
occupation of the city.
240. May God be exalted far beyond what the infidels say!: The Frank
offends both Usama’s theology and Christology. For Muslims, God is
transcendent: He would never take so base and material a form as a human
being, nor is He ever afflicted with youth or age. Consequently, there can
be no Son of God. Thus for Muslims, Jesus is the son of Mary and will
return as the Messiah, but he is a strictly human prophet. On Muslim
conceptions of Jesus, see Tarif Khalidi, The Muslim Jesus: Sayings and
Stories in Islamic Literature (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press,
2001).
241. regard for honour or propriety: By ‘regard for honour’ here I translate
nakhwa, translated above as ‘courage for the sake of honour’, i.e., this is a
specific emotion, a sense that one’s honour must be policed. With
‘propriety’ I translate the roughly synonymous ghayra, often translated
‘jealousy’ but connoting a sense of earnest concern for one’s reputation.
242. Whenever I went to Nablus… sense of propriety!: As the reader may
notice, this anecdote, a much-beloved one among Usamo-logists, is
probably too good to be true, bearing all the structural and rhetorical
hallmarks of a joke. So Usama’s claim to have ‘witnessed’ this, as with
modern urban legends, must be taken with a grain of salt. Nablus is
Classical Neapolis, ancient Shechem, some 50 km north of Jerusalem. As
Usama notes throughout the text, it was a town where Muslims and Franks
mixed with some frequency.
243. Ma’arra: That is, the town of Ma’arrat al-Nu’man, about 40 km north
of Shayzar, captured by the Franks in 1098, lost, and then recaptured in
1105.
244. madame… ‘the lady’: Usama uses the term al-dama, which he (or Salim
– it is not clear) translates accurately into Arabic as al-sitt, ‘the lady’.
245. Tyre: Port city in the far north of the Latin Kingdom of Jerusalem,
captured in 1124.
246. William de Bures: Usama calls him Kilyam dabur, William (or
Guillaume) de Bures. He was granted the lordship of Tiberias, one of the
principal fiefdoms in the Kingdom of Jerusalem, in 1119, and served as
constable and regent of the Kingdom when Baldwin II was held captive in
Aleppo in 1123. As Usama explains, by ‘us’ Usama refers here to himself
and his lord Mu’in al-Din of Damascus.
247. Let this go and bring the conversation back to Harim: A hemistich from
the sixth-century pre-Islamic poet Zuhayr ibn Abi Sulama al-Muzani, by
which Usama states his desire to change the subject.
248. And let us stop discussing… move on to something else: A line that has
perplexed Usama’s editors and translators. My reading follows that of
Miquel (p. 300, n. 16), which is largely the result of context. Cf. Gibb (p.
1006) and the oddly anatomical Hitti (Memoirs, p. 167).
249. vicomte: Usama renders the Frankish term as al-biskund and gives its
Arabic synonym as shihna, governor.
250. they did some work on his eyes: Usama uses a euphemism fa-kahalahu,
‘they applied kohl to him’, a verb normally used to describe the application
of dark make-up around the eyes, using small metal wands to apply it, as
was the fashion. But despite Gibb’s claim (p. 1009), the term was also used
as a bit of gallows humour to describe the practice of sticking sharp, red-
hot sticks into the eyes, blinding the victim but leaving their eyeballs
whole: see E. W. Lane, An Arabic-English Lexicon, 8 vols. (London and
Edinburgh: Williams and Norgate, 1863–93), s.v. kahala.
251. Burhan al-Din ibn al-Balkhi: Contrary to the opinion of Miquel (p. 302,
n. 23), Ibn al-Balkhi (d. 1154) was not ‘un personage inconnu’, but one of
the greatest religious scholars of his day. See Siyar, 20:276.
252. Chief Tadrus ibn al-Saffi: Despite Usama’s name-dropping, this urban
‘Chief’ (ra’is) is quite unknown. Derenbourg (Vie, p. 474, n. 4) suggests
his name might be a rendering of a Greek name such as Theodoros
Sophianos. Unfortunately, this creation has been taken as a real person in
subsequent scholarship.
253. ‘Urs: Derenbourg (Vie, p. 475, n. 3) suggests ‘Hurso’.
254. bourgeois: Usama’s narrator uses the term burjasi, which is glossed
here as tajir, ‘merchant’.
255. meaning his master: Usama’s uncle, Sultan. But the attendant (ghulam)
could hardly be so direct about Sultan and so named Homs as his master’s
residence to deflect any rage. Sultan clearly saw right through him.
256. Lu’lu’: Not to be confused with Lu’lu’, ruler of Aleppo (1113–18).
257. Sayf al-Din Sawar: Governor of Hama for the Burid dynasty of
Damascus in 1128–9. He later sought service with the atabeg Zangi. See
Ta’rikh, pp. 374, 382, 450.
258. saw our men crossing the ford: That is, the men (presumably civilians)
from Shayzar were crossing through the water away from the oncoming
Franks towards the safety of Shayzar’s walls. To avoid drowning, some
went on the shoulders of others.
259. Commander: I am translating the Persian title salar.
260. Exalted is He who created His creatures in various sorts: An allusion to
Qur’an 71:13.
261. Khatun: Turkish for ‘Lady’; it may in fact be the woman’s title, her
status as daughter of the powerful Seljuk amir Tutush providing sufficient
identification for the men in her life.
262. Masyaf Castle… heat of Shayzar: The castle (which Usama calls
Misyath), southwest of Shayzar in the salubrious climate of the Nusayri
mountains, was taken from the Banu Munqidh by Nizaris in 1140 and
became one of their most redoubtable lairs.
263. the Bridge: That is, from the Bridge Fortress, where a garrison of
Kinani tribesmen kept watch, as we have seen.
264. mail chausses: (Arabic kalsat al-zard) pieces of armour designed to
protect the legs.
265. horse armour: The Arabic (zardiyatihi) implies mail horse armour.
266. In the year 539… Damascus: This is the campaign of the atabeg Zangi
of Mosul and Aleppo against the Burid dynasty of Damascus.
267. al-Qutayyifa… al-Fustuqa: Al-Qutayyifa lies about 40 km northeast of
Damascus, on the road to Palmyra. Al-Fustuqa was a khan (essentially a
caravanserai) lying further down the road towards Damascus (see Vie, p.
149, n. 4).
268. ‘Adhra’… al-Qusayr… the khan itself: ‘Adhra’ is a village in the Ghuta,
the oasis settlements ringing the city of Damascus. Al-Qusayr (‘Fortlet’) is
here not the small town on the road to Homs – despite the statement of
Samarrai (p. 169, n. 374) – but rather Khan al-Qusayr, located just outside
the Ghuta on the Palmyra road. The ‘khan itself’ is al-Qusayr’s khan.
269. just to ruin my reputation: Hitti has la-tuksar, ya Musa, ‘in order to be
destroyed, O Musa!’ But al-Yaghisiyani’s name is Muhammad, not Musa. I
follow here the reading of Samarrai (p. 169): li-tuksar namusi.
270. dirty little so-and-so: Usama’s demure kadha wa-kadha surely, and
regrettably, hides al-Yaghisiyani’s more pungent expletive.
271. officers of the guard: Usama uses the Persian term shawish, sergeant,
guardsman.
272. valley of Halbun: The village of Halbun lies to the northwest of
Damascus, in the rough highlands beyond Jabal Qasiyun, the wizened
escarpment that overlooks the city.
273. to enter the service of Nur al-Din: Nur al-Din had captured Damascus
from the Burids in April 1154 and made it his capital. Usama was by now
already in his service, having entered immediately upon his eventful flight
from Egypt (as detailed in Part I), but he is perhaps here assisting Khusraw
ibn Talil to make the transition. Khusraw became a prominent amir under
Nur al-Din and later under Saladin.
274. Church of Baal: The unpointed Arabic text has produced some
contorted interpretations of this phrase (see Miquel, p. 330, n. 16, for a
list); I follow Samarrai (p. 172). By ‘church’ here I am literally translating
kanisa, though Usama clearly means the awe-inspiring ruins of the
Hellenistic Temple of Baal in Baalbek, as famed in his day as in ours.
275. I was present… defeat at Amid: These events took place in 1134. Al-
Sawr was a small citadel on the banks of the Khabur River in the province
of Diyar Bakr, about 50 km northeast of Mardin. By ‘crossbowmen’ I
translate jarkhiya, the jarkh being a large and unwieldy, yet nevertheless
portable, form of crossbow used in siege and naval warfare. Amid was the
chief city of the region and an Artuqid capital.
276. citadel of al-Bari’a: Frankish Montferrand, also known as Barin; this
fortress is located northwest of Homs, quite close to Rafaniya. This is a
reference to Zangi’s campaigns in the area in the summer of 1137, which
probably included the battle that is described on the first remaining folio of
the manuscript (see Part I).
277. Abu Bakr al-Dubaysi: This amir (d. 1157) was lord of Jazirat ibn ‘Umar
(modern Cizre in Turkey).
278. I have three retainers: Kujak is listed as a great Seljuk amir in an earlier
anecdote; Sunqur is otherwise unknown, though Hitti (Memoirs, p. 186, n.
33) says he was ‘one of Zanki’s viziers’. Samarrai (p. 176) reads his name
as ‘Juqur’ and identifies him with Zangi’s deputy in Mosul, Abu Sa’id
Juqur al-Hamadhani (d. 1144).
279. battle at Baghdad: This was a battle between the atabeg Zangi and the
‘Abbasid caliph al-Mustarshid, in 1132.
280. Qafjaq’s location… in the mountains of Kuhistan: Qafjaq was a
Turkoman amir. Kuhistan refers to the mountainous region straddling the
borders of modern Iran and Afghanistan, bordered on the west by the
Dasht-i Kavir and on the east by the Hari Rud.
281. parcham-ornament: Usama uses the term barjam, from the Persian
parcham, the tail of a sea-cow, which was hung from the necks of horses as
decoration.
282. al-Karkhini: In Upper Mesopotamia, between Daquqa and Irbil.
283. as if he were plundering Romans: Usama refers here to a point of
Islamic law: Jews and Christians living under Islamic rule, as dhimmis, are
supposed to be protected from being treated as prisoners of war.
284. Only a few years had passed: Actually, more than a ‘few years’, as
Usama’s account about the Batinis is situated in 1114, twenty-five years
earlier.
285. not like the generous host: A play on the man’s name, Jawad, which
means ‘the generous’.
286. We mounted up… It’s a trick!: Hitti (Memoirs, p. 193) leaves out this
sentence.
287. I used to take such relief… dying of thirst: This passage alludes to
Usama’s nearness to, yet exile from, his home at Shayzar (by now
demolished).
288. Called me to him: The rest of this purple passage is given up to praise
of Saladin, founder of the Ayyubid dynasty and Usama’s last patron. He
invited Usama to join him at his court in Damascus in 1174.
289. I prayed… I do answer: Apparently a poem of Usama’s own creation.
The ‘two angels’ mentioned here are the two angels that record the deeds
of men prior to Judgment.
290. God is enough for us, He is the best protector: Cf. Qur’an 3:173. These
final lines may well be the work of the copyist, not of Usama himself.
PART III CURIOUS TALES: HOLY MEN AND HEALERS
1. Section: In the original manuscript, Usama inserts here the word fasl, ‘new
section’, which is the only indication as to how the work was organized.
This section and the one following it are best seen as appendices of
anecdotes added to The Book of Contemplation after its completion.
2. Whatever good things you possess come from God: Qur’an 16:53.
3. preacher of the city of ls’ird: Siraj al-Din Abu Tahir Ibrahim ibn al-
Husayn ibn Ibrahim is otherwise unknown. Is’ird (modern Siirt) lies today
in eastern Turkey, about 100 km southwest of Bitlis. The ultimate source of
the account, Abu al-Faraj al-Baghdadi, is better known as ‘Abd al-Rahman
ibn al-Jawzi, a celebrated jurisconsult and historian (d. 1201).
4. Abu ‘Abdallah Muhammad al-Basri: Samarrai (p. 185) reads the man’s
name as ‘al-Tabari’. In either case, he is unknown.
5. lawful: The text reads halal, lawful to consume according to Islamic law,
evoking Qur’an 2:168.
6. A man from al-Kufa… descendant of the Prophet: Al-Kufa was one of the
principal cities of Iraq, famed especially for its religious learning, located
about 150 km south of Baghdad. Usama names the man as a descendant of
the Prophet, in Arabic sharif.
7. Chief Judge al-Shami al-Hamawi: This is Qadi al-Qudat al-Shami, Abu
Bakr Muhammad ibn al-Muzaffar ibn Bakr al-Hamawi al-Shafi’i (d. 1095),
acclaimed ascetic and chief judge of the Shafi’ite school of law for Syria
(see Siyar, 19:85–8).
8. Hisn Kayfa… Muhammad al-Samma’: Hisn Kayfa, situated on the right
bank of the Tigris in Upper Mesopotamia, was Usama’s place of residence
from 1164 to 1174. Al-Khidr, after whom the mosque is named, is a greatly
revered saint-like figure in Islam, often likened to Elijah. Muhammad al-
Samma’ is otherwise unknown.
9. He had his own prayer-room… one of the saints: Usama calls the prayer-
room a zawiya, a term usually designating a complex devoted to a Sufi
brotherhood, especially in North Africa, but in origin meaning simply a
‘corner’ or small cell. Usama calls the man min al-awliya’, ‘a client/friend
[of God]’; technically there are no saints in Islam, but such holy men
approximate the mixture of piety, closeness, mortality and the miraculous
associated with the cult of saints in Christianity.
10. Muhammad al-Busti: Abu ‘Abdallah Muhammad ibn Ibrahim al-Busti, a
Sufi master (d. 1188). See Siyar, 20:283.
11. practise daily fasting: The daily fast (sawm al-dahr) was a non-canonical
form of excessive fasting that was becoming increasingly popular among
the pious in Usama’s day.
12. eating dead animals: That is, animals not killed in the ritually prescribed
manner. The point is not that he actually took dead animals as his food, but
that he is doing it as if it were the case, to make his fasting even more
difficult (aj’alu ma akluhu ka’l-mayta).
13. Ma’arra: That is, the Syrian town of Ma’arrat al-Nu’man.
14. making the station: The text reads al-waqfa, one of the rituals of the
pilgrimage to Mecca, involving standing in prayer at nearby Mount Arafat.
The point of the tale is to highlight the miraculous nature of the news of the
man’s death – a man who prayed over a dead man in Mecca could not
possibly arrive in Syria the next day to tell the news, unless God was
involved.
15. Shihab al-Din… ibn Sabuktakin: The name of Usama’s source deserves
some comment. The man is, so far as I have been able to tell, unknown.
But his ancestor, who bears the Turkish name Sabuktakin, was a freedman
(mawla) of Mu’izz al-Dawla ibn Buwayh (d. 967), who was one of the
princes of the Buwayhid (or Buyid) dynasty that controlled Iraq and parts
of Iran. As his anecdote suggests, he is certainly a man of some station.
Usama heard this story in the Upper Mesopotamian city of Mosul while he
was based in Hisn Kayfa.
16. Commander of the Faithful… al-Anbar: Al-Muqtafi reigned as ‘Abbasid
caliph in Baghdad from 1136 to 1160. Al-Anbar is more or less due west of
Baghdad, on the east bank of the Euphrates; al-Sandudiya (or Sandawda’)
lies on the west.
17. Commander of the Faithful ‘Ali: ‘Ali ibn Abi Talib (d. 661), cousin and
son-in-law of the Prophet, fourth Sunni caliph, first Shi’ite imam and a
figure of tremendous religious authority.
18. sword with an iron hilt: This suggests a sword of some antiquity, perhaps
a relic or bit of caliphal regalia, as this style of sword had long since given
way to swords with leather-covered wooden hilts.
19. our lord al-Mustazhir: ‘Abbasid caliph (r. 1094–1118).
20. Ask him something useful… into his mouth: It is not entirely clear where
al-Muqtafi’s speech ends in the text, or if Usama is interpolating. I have
assumed that this is all intended to be part of the caliph’s dialogue.
21. one of those who desire only the fleeting life: An allusion to Qur’an
17:18–19, which contrasts those who cling to this life with those who
piously yearn for the afterlife.
22. the caliph said to me: That is, to the ultimate narrator of this complex
tale, Shihab al-Din Abu al-Fath.
23. Official procedure… authorized for him: The point of this last paragraph
is that the amount of the award was never specified in the document, so the
caretaker was in possession of, as it were, a blank cheque from the caliph
himself, had he only known.
24. Khawaja Buzurk: A Persian title (khwaja buzurg) meaning ‘Great Lord’,
and borne by several prominent viziers of the Seljuks, in this case the
mighty vizier Nizam al-Mulk, who effectively ran the sultanate until his
death in 1092.
25. From a foreign land: The text might also be read ‘From Ghazna’, a city
in Afghanistan.
26. Malikshah: That is, Khawaja Buzurk’s lord, the Seljuk sultan Malikshah
(r. 1072–92).
27. sura of tabaraka: That is, the Qur’anic chapter (sura) that begins with
the word tabaraka (‘blessed be’). This could be either sura 25 or 67.
28. Qur’an-master: (Arabic muqri’) a man who instructs Muslims in the art
of reciting the text of the Qur’an.
29. Ibn Mujahid: Ahmad ibn Musa ibn Mujahid al-Muqri’ died in Baghdad
in 935 (al-Jazari, Ghayat al-Nihaya fi Tabaqat al-Qurra’ (Cairo: Maktabat
al-Khanji, 1932), 1:139).
30. My womenfolk asked me for a daniq… to rub her palate: A daniq is a
trifling measure of weight also used to denote a fractional piece of
currency, either a fraction in theory (e.g., one-sixth of a dinar, though this
value varies), or in practice, i.e., a piece physically cut from a larger coin.
The point is that the man didn’t even have the minuscule amount he
needed, not two pennies to rub together, but was rewarded with a fortune.
The palate-rubbing ritual (tahnik) was frequently performed on newborns,
sometimes using dates rather than honey, and symbolized the entrance of
the child into the new community.
31. ‘Ali ibn ‘Isa: Ali ibn ‘Isa, the so-called ‘Good Vizier’, held office twice
for the ‘Abbasid caliph al-Muqtadir (913–17 and 927–8).
32. fuqqa’-vendor: Fuqqa’ was a beer-like beverage made of barley, whose
name derives from the head of suds, faqaqi’, that appears on its surface.
33. As you can see: Presumably one can tell the man’s trade because he is
carrying his wares with him.
34. Zayn al-Din ‘Ali Kujak: One of the atabeg Zangi’s commanders, named
governor of Mosul upon the atabeg’s death. He himself died in 1167.
35. Abu al-Khattab al-’Ulaymi: Abu al-Khattab ‘Umar ibn Muhammad ibn
‘Abdallah ibn Ma’mar al-’Ulaymi, a merchant and well-travelled scholar
of hadith (Prophetic Tradition), he died in 1178 (see Siyar, 21:49–50). His
title of ‘hafiz’ indicates that he had memorized the Qur’an by heart.
36. al-Qadi Abu Bakr… known as Qadi al-Maristan: An accomplished judge
and student of hadith who, as a prisoner of the Byzantines, learned to read
and write Greek. Among his many students was the scholar and historian
Ibn al-Jawzi. He died in 1140 (see Siyar, 20:23–8). A maristan or
bimaristan was an institution set aside for the housing and care of the
mentally and physically disabled, a regular feature of the larger cities of the
Islamic world.
37. During my pilgrimage… pilgrim-garment: By ‘pilgrimage’, the
pilgrimage to Mecca is implied. This rite, incumbent upon all able
Muslims, involved numerous rituals, most famously the circumambulation
(tawwaf) of the Ka’ba, the large black cubical stone structure associated
with Abraham (called here simply al-bayt, ‘the House’). Pilgrims were also
obliged to dress in special simple unstitched garments signifying their new
state of ritual purity. And unstitched garments, as this pilgrim realized,
have no pockets.
38. in the Sacred Precinct: (Arabic haram) here meaning the sanctified zone
surrounding the Ka’ba and other pilgrimage stations in Mecca. Entrance is
forbidden to anyone not in a state of temporary consecration, established
by a sequence of rituals including a statement of intention, ablution, ritual
dress and abstaining from certain acts. Mecca, Medina and Jerusalem all
possess such sacred precincts.
39. the bride was exhibited before me: This refers to a traditional wedding
practice in which the bride, in all her finery, at the head of a procession is
presented to her husband.
40. Lawful enjoyment has bent the nose of jealousy: Meaning, ‘You don’t
have to be worried about my intentions when I ask you, since you are
lawfully married to her.’
41. Yuhanna ibn Butlan… his clinic in Aleppo: Ibn Butlan was one of the
most celebrated physicians of his day (d. 1063; see EI2, s.v. ‘Ibn Butlan’).
Though it literally means ‘shop’, I translate dukkan as ‘clinic’ here as Ibn
Butlan appears to be using the space to treat patients and instruct his
students.
42. But doctor… with all its coldness: Usama addresses the physician as
hakim. Oddly, he refers to the melon as a rumman, a pomegranate, for
reasons which are unclear, perhaps as a way of depicting his
dismissiveness at the time. When he says the melon is cold, he does not
mean chilled, but rather that cold humours dominate in the fruit, and so
will further imbalance his already imbalanced system. The miracle-melon
described is apparently a variety of the luscious, thick-skinned musk melon
or kharbuja, Cucumis melo.
43. On Sleep and Dreams: This book, unfortunately, no longer survives. See
Cobb, pp. 51–6.
44. If We extend anyone’s life, We reverse his development: Qur’an 36:68.
OTHER EXCERPTS
In the footnote, Derenbourg suggests it indicates that these are monks of the
Chapter of St John (thus his reference to oaths and hospitality). More likely, they
are monks leaning upon some kind of crutch-like piece of gear. This
interpretation would fit better with the theme of the anthology (staves) and the
point of the passage (that Usama is impressed by the strenuous devotions he sees
these old men performing, despite their frailty).
39. al-Tawawis: The Khanqah al-Tawusiya, Damascus’s first Sufi meeting-
space, located in the Suq Saruja neighbourhood, northwest of the city, but
now no longer extant.
40. Ibn al-Sallar: The all-powerful vizier of the Fatimid caliphate (r. 1150–
53), who features in many of Usama’s Egyptian anecdotes in The Book of
Contemplation.
41. patriarch of Egypt… Ethiopia: Yoannis V was Coptic patriarch of Egypt
from 1146 to 1166. By the twelfth century, the Coptic patriarch of Egypt
usually appointed the Ethiopian patriarch himself. The Ethiopian patriarch
alluded to in this account is Mika’el I.
42. The First Crusade and its Sequel in the North: This account collapses
events stretching from 1096 to 1108, and is really a mere digression started
by a similar tale involving the haggling over terms of ransom between
Alexander and the emperor of China. Nevertheless, it is one of the only
Muslim accounts describing what at least one Muslim took to be the goal
of the First Crusade: not merely Jerusalem, but Baghdad and the East.
43. Jikirmish: Shams al-Dawla Jikirmish (also Chökürmish), Seljuk governor
of Mosul (d. 1106).
44. in battle: Near Harran in 1104, see Claude Cahen, La Syrie du nord à
l’époque des croisades et la principauté franque d’Anti-oche (Paris: Paul
Geuthner, 1940), pp. 236–8.
45. King Baldwin the Prince and Joscelin: Baldwin of Le Bourcq was count
of Edessa (1100–1118) and later King of Jerusalem as Baldwin II (r. 1118–
31). Joscelin of Courtenay was Baldwin’s cousin and later count of Edessa
after him (1119–31).
46. Bohemond… Jikirmish: Bohemond left for Europe in the autumn of
1104; after failing in a campaign against the Byzantines at Durazzo in
1107, he died in Apulia in Jikirmish died in 1106.
47. Jawali Saqawa: Also spelled ‘Chavli Saqaveh’ or ‘Saqao’, Seljuk
governor of Mosul until 1108, appointed by the Seljuk sultan Muhammad
ibn Malikshah.
48. lord of Antioch… ibn Tutush: Tancred was regent of Frankish-held
Antioch while Bohemond was absent in Europe. Ridwan ibn Tutush was
Seljuk lord of Aleppo (r. 1095–1113).
49. The blows of the swords… prisoner: A reference to the conflicts of 1108,
involving tortuous alliances between Franks and Muslims, and ending in
battle near Tall Bashir, about midway between Aleppo and Edessa. See
Cahen, Syrie du nord, pp. 247–51.
50. the year 507 (1114): The text gives a date of 527 (1133), but this is a
misreading for 507 (1114). This is the same Isma’ili attack on Shayzar
which features in a number of anecdotes in The Book of Contemplation.
51. Ibn al-Munira: Born in Kafartab, he later settled in Shayzar, probably
fleeing the Frankish capture of his town during the First Crusade. He was a
respected grammarian and religious scholar (d. 1110).
52. spurs: (Arabic mahamiz) a valuable piece of any horseman’s gear, but
never easy to steal.
53. woman’s get-up: A woman’s wrap is probably intended, a favourite
disguise of bandits. Cf. the disguise of the bandit al-Zamarrakal in The
Book of Contemplation, ‘Thief Stories’.
54. Ma’arrat: That is, Ma’arrat al-Nu’man, a town just to the northeast of
Kafartab.
55. scarred: Reading ‘alabat for the edition’s ghalabat.
Index
(Note: The Arabic definite article ‘al-’ has been ignored for purposes of alphabetization.)
‘Abbas ibn Abi al-Futuh ibn Tamim ibn Badis, Rukn al-Din 16, 26–36, 242
‘Abd ‘Ali 189–91
‘Abdallah 107–8
‘Abdallah ibn Maymun al-Hamawi 182–3
‘Abd al-Rahman al-Halhuli 108
Abu ‘Abdallah ibn Hashim 173
Abu ‘Abdallah Muhammad al-Basri 181–2
Abu ‘Abdallah Muhammad ibn Fatik 188–9
Abu ‘Abdallah Muhammad ibn Ibrahim al-Busti 183–4
Abu ‘Abdallah al-Tulaytuli 217–18
Abu al-’Ala’ al-Ma’arri 226
Abu Bakr al-Dubaysi 169
Abu Bakr al-Siddiq 46
Abu Bakr Muhammad ibn ‘Abd al-Baqi ibn Muhammad al-Ansari al-Furdi 191–3
Abu al-Baqa 30
Abu al-Faraj 248–9
Abu al-Faraj al-Baghdadi 181–2
Abu al-Fath 146
Abu al-Fawaris Murhaf 37
Abu al-Hassan ‘Ali ibn Hilal 217
Abu al-Hayja 100
Abu al-Jaysh 162
Abu al-Khattab al-’Ulaymi 191–3
Abu al-Majd 117–18
Abu al-Murhaf Nasr 243
Abu Musayka al-Iyadi 46–7
Abu al-Mutawwaj Muqallad 197
Abu al-Qasam al-Khidr ibn Muslim ibn Qasim al-Hamawi 182–3, 184
Abu Qubays Castle 130–31
Abu Turab Haydara ibn Qatramir 224–5
Abu al-Wafa’ Tamim 198
Abu Yusuf al-Qazwini 245–7
Acre 43, 93–5, 206
Adam, Sir 123
‘Adhra’ 163
‘Adud al-Din 235–6
al-Afdal 218–19
al-Afdal ibn Amir al-Juyush 14
al-Afdal Ridwan ibn al-Walakhshi 38–42
Ahmad 111–12
Ahmad ibn Ma’bad ibn Ahmad 159–60
Ahmad ibn Mujir 220–21
Ahmad ibn Musa ibn Mujahid al-Muqri’ 188–9
al-’Ala 61
‘Alam al-Din ‘Ali-Kurd 90
Aleppo 64, 88, 124, 193–4, 195–8, 207, 256
Alexandria 33
‘Ali ‘Abd ibn Abi al-Rayda 139–41
‘Ali ibn Abi Talib 185–6, 190
‘Ali ibn al-Dudawayhi 56
‘Ali ibn Faraj 158–9
‘Ali ibn ‘Isa 188–9
‘Ali ibn Mahbub 134
‘Ali ibn Munqidh, ‘Izz al-Dawla Abu al-Hasan al-Kinani 25, 26, 36, 110–11
‘Ali ibn al-Muqallad ibn Nasr ibn Munqidh, ‘Izz al-Dawla Abu al-Juyush Sadid al-Mulk al-Kinani 65,
137, 197, 199, 242, 245–7, 258
‘Ali ibn Salim ibn Malik 112
‘Ali ibn Sallam al-Numayri 48
‘Allan 109–10
Altuntash, Shams al-Khawass 90
‘Alwan ibn Harrar 135–6
‘Alwan the Iraqi 115
Amid 95–6, 168, 242
Amin al-Dawla Gumushtagin al-Atabaki 39, 40
Amin al-Mulk 30
al-Anbar 185
‘Annaz 128
Ansar, the 59–60
‘Antar the Elder 33–4
‘Antara ibn Shaddad al-’Absi 49
Antioch 72, 75–6, 78, 88, 131, 132, 133, 153–4, 255, 256–7
ants 97
Apamea 49–52, 57–8, 69–70, 79–80, 104, 141, 161, 164–5, 244–5
‘Aqarquf, battle of 243
al-Aqsa Mosque, Jerusalem 147
Araja 258–9
armour 11, 50, 57, 62–3, 67, 71, 78, 87, 113–14, 161, 162
Asad 158
Ascalon 18, 19, 24–6, 258
Asfuna 108–9
astrology 33, 67
Aswan 43
al-Awhad 39
‘ayma 226
‘Ayn al-Dawla al Yaruqi 23
‘ayyarun 83–5
Dalas 16
Damascus 13–14, 23, 33, 37, 39–40, 76, 81, 107, 108, 111, 112–13, 119–20, 127–8, 163–6, 191, 204,
252
Damietta 43
Danith 88–9, 131
Darayya 112
deception 252–3
Demetrios 242–3
Diyar Bakr 101–2
Dome of the Rock, Jerusalem 147–8, 250
dowries 83, 181–2
dropsy 71–2, 159–60, 195–6
Dubays 155
duels 47, 151–2
Dumayr 113
Edessa 127
Egypt 14, 31–5, 41, 43, 191, 204–5, 218–19, 242
Europe 144
Gaza 26
Ghana’im the Austringer 208, 228–9
Ghazi al-Talli 74–5, 111
Ghunaym 71–2
Giza 41
God
benevolence of 105–8
brings victory in war 160–63
governance 100–103
Great Commentary, The 64
al-Hadiqa, battle of 60
Hadr al-Tut 74–5
al-Hafiz li-Din Allah 14, 15, 39, 41–2, 204–5, 242
Haifa 124
al-Hajj Abu ‘Ali 189–91
al-Hakim 245
Halbun 166
Hama 54, 74–5, 90, 91, 98–9, 104, 111–12, 114–15, 128, 155–6, 182–3, 184, 206–7, 215–16, 242
Hamadat 60–61, 62
Hammam the Pilgrim 129
Haritha al-Numayri 58, 79–80
Hasan the Ascetic 105
Hasanun 77
hawks and hawking 72, 201–2, 204–6, 207, 208–16, 218–21, 225–7, 228–9, 230–31, 233
Hayzan 107–8
helmets 57, 62
hernias 194–5
Hijaz, the 244
Hillat ‘Ara 208–9
hippopotami 205
Hisn Kayfa 183–4, 186, 189, 206, 248–9
Hisn al-Khurayba 90–91
Hittan ibn Kamil ibn ‘Ali ibn Munqidh, Dhakhirat al-Dawla Abu al-Qana 70–71
Homs 54, 111, 115, 116, 155–6, 170, 242
horse armour 162
horses 37–8, 110–14, 222, 223–4, 229–30, 231–2
horse-stealing 53–6, 109–10
hostages 115–16
House of the Chain, Jerusalem 250
Hunak 123
hunting 99–100, 118–19, 120, 121–3, 137–9, 156–7, 201–36
hunting dogs 210, 221–3, 225, 226, 233–4
Husam al-Dawla ibn Dilmaj 102–3
Husam al-Dawla Musafir 53–4
Husam al-Mulk (son of ‘Abbas) 36
Husam al-Mulk (nephew of ‘Abbas) 38
hyenas 156–7, 203
Lakrun 15
Latakia 109, 121, 245–6
Lawata, the 16, 41
leopards 122–4
lions 96–7, 99–100, 116–17, 118–22, 137–9, 156–7, 227
Lu’lu’ (mamluk) 154–5, 223–5
Lu’lu’ the Eunuch 88
Lu’lu’a 199–200
luzzayq 228–9
oaths 32, 33
old age 173–6
omens 117–18
On Sleep and Dreams 198
Qadmus 124
Qafjaq 170–73
Qal’at Ja’bar 103, 143, 234, 255
Qara Arslan 95–6
Qara Hisar 207
Qaraja 242
Qatr al-Nada 38–9
Qaymaz 41
Qays ibn al-Khatim 59–60
Qinnasrin 242
Qunayb ibn Malik 127
quntariya, the 243
Qur’an, the 28, 33, 63–4, 67, 208, 224
al-Qusayr 163
al-Qutayyifa 163
‘Umar 156
Upper Mesopotamia 71–2
al-’Uqab the Poet 81–2
‘Urs 15
Usama ibn Murshid ibn ‘Ali ibn Munqidh, Majd al-Din Abu al-Muzaffar al-
Kinani see events and individuals
Usama’s aunt 135–6
Usama’s grandmother 137–9
Usama’s mother 136–7
Uzbeh 85, 88