542

CLEAN CASSAVA CHIPS FOR ANIMAL FEEDING IN THAILAND

Uthai Kanto 1 and Sukanya Juttupornpong1

ABSTRACT
Thailand has been the top cassava products exporter to the world market for decades.
However, there was a decline in exports of cassava pellets to the EU market and this has affected the
prices of both cassava fresh roots and dry products in the country. Therefore, greater domestic use
of cassava for animal feeding in Thailand is being encouraged.
Cassava has been promoted for use in animal feeds in Thailand for more than a decade, but
adoption has been very limited due to the unsuitable quality of cassava products (cassava chips and
pellets) available, and the relatively high price of the products (after mixing with a protein source)
when compared to conventional cereals, such as maize and broken rice. In 1997, when Thailand
suffered an economic crisis as well as a severe slump in cassava prices due to the sharp decline of
cassava pellets exports to the EU market, the Animal Nutrition Research and Development Center
(ANRDC) of Kasetsart University and the Thai Tapioca Development Institute (TTDI) decided to
promote more actively the use of cassava for domestic animal feed production in Thailand.
The activities included the transfer of technology to the farmers in the proper use of cassava
for animal feeding via seminars, workshops, publications T.V media, etc. They also included
technologies to improve the quality of cassava chips to be employed by the farmers. Prime quality
(clean) cassava chips are now produced by some cassava processors and this has facilitated the
successful use of cassava in animal diets. At present, the Department of Interior Trade (DIT) and the
Department of Foreign Trade (DFT), Ministry of Commerce, together with ANRDC and TTDI, have
promoted more production and more uses of prime quality cassava chips, both for animal feeding in
the country and for export to the world market.
Proper feeding of prime quality cassava chips to animals, including pigs, poultry (chickens
and ducks) and cattle, both in laboratory and in commercial animal farms, have shown a very
satisfactory and a comparable performance as compared to those animals fed with maize diets. But
cassava diets also have an advantage in terms of better digestibility, health improvement of the
animals, which has led to a much reduced use of antibiotics in animal production, and a considerable
reduction in the odor of manure. Cassava has been extensively used in pigs and cattle (beef and
dairy) diets at substitution levels of 40-60%. A series of studies on the advantages of using cassava
in animal diets have been conducted at ANRDC of Kasetsart University and the results are very
promising.

INTRODUCTION
Cassava is an important economic root crop grown in Southeast Asia as well as in
tropical Africa and Central America. The crop plays a very important role in the economy
of Thailand since a great number of farmers, especially those in the northeastern part of the
country, rely on cassava for much of their income.
The fresh roots, which contain approximately 60% moisture, are mainly utilized for
the production of cassava starch or dried cassava chips and pellets for animal feeds.

1. Cassava Cultivation in Thailand

Cassava is one of the most important economic crops in Thailand. The country
produces approximately 18-22 million tonnes of fresh roots annually, of which

1
Animal Nutrition Research and Development Center, Department of Animal Science, Kasetsart
University, Kampaengsaen, Nakhon Pathom, 73140, Thailand.
 543

approximately 8 million tonnes are utilized for cassava starch production and the remaining
10-14 million tonnes are processed into 4.5-6.0 million tonnes of dried cassava chips and
pellets for animal feed. The chips are mainly utilized domestically while the pellets are
exported mainly to the European Union (EU) countries. But in 1993, the EU initiated a
CAP reform policy, with the objective to reduce the price of cereals grown in the EU
countries; this has resulted in a decrease in the price of cassava and has gradually reduced
the amount of cassava pellets exported to the EU market. However, more cassava chips are
utilized domestically for animal feed; therefore, the production volume is still maintained
and the cassava price crisis has been relieved.
Cassava production is scattered throughout the country but the major production
areas are in the northeastern and eastern parts of Thailand, while considerable volumes of
cassava are also produced in the northern and western parts of the country. Planting of
cassava generally starts in April and May, at the beginning of the rainy season, and
harvesting is normally done in October to March of the following year during the dry
season. It is the good weather in Thailand during the cassava harvesting season that ensures
that Thai cassava products are of high quality, compared to the products of some other
countries.
In addition, in Thailand cassava varieties have been developed that produce high
yields and have high starch contents; these are now widely distributed to the growers. For
example, Kasetsart 50 (KU 50), which was developed by the Department of Agronomy,
Faculty of Agriculture, Kasetsart University; and Rayong 5, Rayong 60 and Rayong 90
which were developed by the Department of Agriculture, Ministry of Agriculture and Co-
operatives, are new cassava varieties which produce high yields and have high starch
contents; these are now commonly grown by farmers in the country.

2. Toxic Substances in Cassava and their Detoxification

Fresh cassava roots contains the cyanogenic-glycoside, linamarin, which is
hydrolyzed into glucose and hydrocyanic acid (HCN) by the activity of linamarase enzyme
when the root is damaged or cut into small pieces. The released HCN slowly evaporates
into the atmosphere, so the level of HCN in the cassava products is reduced.
Dried cassava chips are produced by chopping the fresh roots into small pieces and
then sun-drying for 3-4 days; this, greatly reduces the HCN content of the chips to levels
that are non-toxic to animals. Khajarern et al. (1982) have demonstrated that sun-drying of
cassava chips for 6 days reduced the HCN content of the chips from 111.83 to 22.97 ppm
(Table 1). Storing of dried cassava chips also further reduces the HCN content of the
cassava product. Storing of dried cassava chips for five days reduced the HCN content of
the product from 87.14 to 36.25 ppm (Table 2). Steam assisted pelleting of cassava further
reduced the HCN content to 11.82 ppm (Khajarern et al., 1979).
It can be concluded that production of dried cassava chips involving 3-6 days of
sun-drying and a few days of storage before shipment to the feed manufacturer or users
lowers the HCN content in the product to non-toxic levels. Additional storage of the
cassava product at the feed mill will further reduce the HCN content and provide an
additional safety margin for the users. The use of cassava pellets eliminates any risk of
HCN toxicity to the animals.
From our field experiences, the authors have promoted the use of cassava chips in
pig and poultry feeds for the past decade. Good quality cassava chips produced in
 544

Thailand, in which the moisture content is less than 14%, have on average an HCN content
below 30 ppm, and have produced no HCN toxicity in animals.
HCN in cassava may be eliminated by cooking, steaming, drying, ensiling as well
as by washing. Some of these processes are not practical for preparation of cassava
products for animal feeds, but they may be employed in the preparation of cassava for
human consumption.

Table 1. Effects of length of sun drying on the HCN content of cassava chips.

Days of sun drying HCN content (ppm)

0 111.83
1 111.96
2 110.96
3 109.96
4 90.72
5 52.22
6 22.97
Source: Khajarern et al., 1982.

Table 2. Effects of length of storage on HCN content of cassava chips.

Days of sun drying HCN content (ppm)

0 87.14
1 56.76
2 40.11
3 29.52
4 31.46
5 36.25
Source : Khajarern et al., 1982.

3. Production of Dried Cassava Chips and Pellets

Dried cassava chips and pellets are common cassava products used in animal feeds.
A schematic diagram of their production process is shown in Figure 1. Freshly harvested
roots are cleaned by washing or sifting, then chipped into small pieces and sun-dried on
concrete floors for 3-6 days, depending on weather conditions and sunlight. The chips are
regularly turned over by mechanical raking throughout the drying period. Dried chips
normally contain 13-14% moisture and are kept in the warehouse for a few days before
shipment to the users.
Cassava chips may be ground, steamed and pelletized into cassava pellets which
are more compact, less dusty and very convenient for transportation and bulk shipment.
However, some additives such as palm kernel cake or palm oil should be added in order to
facilitate the pelletizing process. Some additives which have a high crude fiber content
may affect the nutritional value of cassava pellets; therefore, more attention should be paid
to quality control when using cassava pellets in animal diets.
Dried cassava chips are bulky and dusty, and are not appropriate for bulk shipment
and transportation by ship. However, chips are easy to determine their quality and are very
appropriate for domestic use in the feed industry.
 545

Fresh Cassava Roots

cleaning, sifting

chipping

sun-drying
sun- drying (3-
(3-66 days)

Dry Cassava Chips Animal Feeds

grinding

steaming

pelletizing

cooling

Dry Cassava Pellets Animal Feeds

Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the cassava chips and pellets production process.

4. Nutritive Value of Dried Cassava Chips and Pellets

The chemical composition of cassava compared to maize, sorghum and broken rice
is shown in Table 3. In general, cassava is an excellent energy feed ingredient but contains
very little protein (approximately 2%) and has low levels of amino acids as compared to
other feed ingredients. Cassava products are also low in fat and contain no pigments for
poultry. The chemical composition of cassava chips and pellets produced in Thailand is
shown in Table 4. In general, the crude fiber and ash contents of cassava pellets may be
 546

higher than cassava chips due to the addition of pelleting additives such as palm kernel
cake or some vegetable oil for lubricants. The nutritive value of pelleted cassava varies
according to the types and amount of pelleting additives included. Additives that increase
the crude fiber and ash levels in the pelleted cassava will lower the nutritive value of the
product.

Table 3. Comparison of chemical composition of cassava, broken rice, maize and sorghum.

Cassava Broken rice Maize Sorghum

Crude protein (%) 2.00 8.00 8.00 11.80
Lysine (%) 0.09 0.27 0.25 0.23
Methionine (%) 0.03 0.27 0.19 0.16
Methionine+Cystine (%) 0.06 0.32 0.39 0.27
Tryptophan (%) 0.02 0.10 0.09 0.10
Threonine (%) 0.07 0.36 0.32 0.33
Isoleucine (%) 0.07 0.45 0.34 0.44
Arginine (%) 0.12 0.36 0.40 0.39
Leucine (%) 0.12 0.71 1.17 1.38
Phen + Tyr (%) 0.12 1.15 0.81 0.96
Histidine (%) 0.03 0.18 0.25 0.22
Valine (%) 0.09 0.53 0.46 0.55
Glycine (%) 0.08 0.71 0.33 0.33

Metab. energy for pigs (Mcal/kg) 3.26 3.60 3.30 3.14

Metab. energy for poultry (Mcal/kg) 3.50 3.50 3.37 3.25
Fat (%) 0.75 0.90 4.00 3.00
Crude fiber (%) 4.00 1.00 2.50 3.00
Calcium (%) 0.12 0.03 0.01 0.04
Avialable phosphorus (%) 0.05 0.04 0.10 0.10

Table 4. Standard of cassava chips and pellets produced in Thailand.

Cassava chips Cassava pellets

Moisture (%) 13 13
Crude protein (%) 2 2
Crude fiber (%) 3.5-4.0 4.0-4.5
Ash /Sand 2 2
Nitrogen-free extract (%) 75-80 73-78

The crude fiber and ash contents of cassava chips depend very much on the quality
of fresh roots and the processing techniques. Good quality fresh roots, which are clean and
have minimal or no adulteration of stems or woody parts will produce good quality cassava
chips with low crude fiber and ash contents. Washing or sifting of fresh roots to eliminate
sand and soil before chipping significantly lowers the ash content. Production of large
cassava chips not only minimizes the dustiness during processing but also prolongs the
drying period and thus reduces the HCN content. Peeling of fresh roots before processing
will also lower the crude fiber and ash contents of the chips. However, peeling is not
 547

recommended as it is very tedious and impractical as well as uneconomical for preparation

of cassava for animal feed. The use of good quality cassava chips or pellets produced from
unpeeled roots normally result in very satisfactory performances of the animals when
compared to broken rice or maize.

The nutritive value of cassava products also depends on the contents of organic and
inorganic parts of the cassava. Khajarern et al. (1979) have categorized the nutritive value
of cassava products as chemical grade or quality score according to the following equation:

Chemical grade or quality score = OM [ADF + (CF 3)]

where OM = % organic matter

ADF = % acid detergent fiber
CF = % crude fiber

Cassava products may be classified into four grades: A,B,C and D when the quality
score is >80, 7580, 70-75 and <70, respectively. However they did not report any
information on tested results of the effects of the quality score on the performance of the
animals.
Phansurin et al. (2002) and Lokaewmanee et al. (2002) have shown that the
metabolizable energy (ME) content of cassava chips are inversely related to the levels of
crude fiber in the feed ingredients (Table 5). Increasing the levels of crude fiber
significantly (P<0.05) decreased the ME content of the cassava chips, both in pig and in
chicken diets. It is advisable to use only high-quality cassava products in animal feeds;
these not only have low fiber contents and thus allow a higher inclusion rate of the product
in the animal diets, but they also have a higher nutritive value, which is worth the higher
price.

Table 5. Metabolizable energy (ME) of cassava starch and chips with different levels of
crude fiber in pig and chicken diets.

Crude Pigs Broilers

Types of fiber
cassava products (%) 20 kg 60 kg 3 weeks 7 weeks
ME (Kcal/kg)
Cassava starch 0 3,741 3,756 3,819 3,848
Chips of peeled roots 2.3 3,540 3,574 3,712 3,749
Prime quality chips 3.9 3,356 3,385 3,587 3,615
Regular quality chips 5.2 3,189 3,291 3,283 3,335
Source: Punsurin et al., 2002; Lokaewmanee et al., 2002.

Cassava starch is highly digestible due to the soft-starch as it consists of more than
80% amylopectin. Cassava has the highest digestibilities in dry matter, organic matter and
energy in different parts of the digestive tract of growing pigs when compared to maize,
sorghum and barley (Table 6) (Reas, 1996). The cassava diet showed a significant linear
decline in dry matter, organic matter and energy from the stomach down to the caecum,
resulting in an almost complete digestion before the large intestine. The maize diet had
 548

lower digestibilities for dry matter, organic matter and energy compared to cassava, but
these differences were not statistically significant. Sorghum and barley were not
significantly different from each other but were significantly lower than cassava and maize
in the digestibilities of dry matter, organic matter and energy after the small intestine. It
can be concluded that cassava is an excellent energy source and can replace the cereal
grains in growing pig diets.

Table 6. Nutrient digestibility (%) of cassava, maize, sorghum and barley in the different
parts of the digestive tract and anus (faeces) of growing pigs.

Small Large
Diets Stomach intestine Caecum intestine Faeces
Dry Matter
cassava 30.6 59.0 87.5 a 89.1 a 90.3
maize 1.4 59.3 82.5 a 87.5 ab 88.2
sorghum 4.0 54.8 74.2 b 84.3 bc 87.6
barley 16.5 63.5 69.1 b 81.4 c 83.0
LSD NS NS 8.12 3.29
Organic Matter
cassava 30.2 a 61.6 88.8 a 90.9 a 92.7
maize 1.0 b 57.0 83.7 a 89.4 ab 90.1
sorghum -7.8 b 56.3 76.2 b 86.8 b 89.6
barley 12.2 ab 64.3 72.7 b 83.4 c 84.0
LSD 19.8 NS 7.4 40.5
Energy
cassava 28.3 a 54.4 86.8 a 89.0 a 90.6
maize 2.0 b 50.4 81.9 a 87.6 a 88.3
sorghum -7.6 b 49.6 72.5 b 83.5 b 86.8
barley 2.2 b 59.4 68.6 b 80.3 c 82.3
LSD 12.0 NS 8.9 2.8
Source: Reas, 1996.

Cassava products may be contaminated with mold growth under standard

production practices, but it appears that the molds produce very little or no aflatoxins or
other mycotoxins. Scudamore et al. (1997) studied the occurrence of mycotoxins in 330
samples of raw ingredients used for animal feeding in the 186 feed mills in the United
Kingdom in 1992. They reported that no cassava samples were found to be contaminated
with aflatoxins or other mycotoxins, while samples of maize, rice bran, palm kernel meal,
cottonseed meal, wheat and barley were found to be contaminated with aflatoxin B1,
fumonisin B1 and B2, ochratoxin A or zearalenone. Protein enriched cassava (PEC), which
is produced by two days of fermentation of cassava with Aspergillus niger followed by two
days of fermentation with Saccharomyces cereviseae can totally replace maize in growing
finishing pig diets (Laosriratanachai, 1986). Fermentation with these fungi produced heavy
mold growth on the substrate but there were only trace amount of aflatoxins in the PEC
product. Results of our own survey also indicate that pieces of heavily molded cassava
chips collected from cassava chipping yards in Thailand contain only trace amounts of
zearalenone and no aflatoxins (Sukanya Juttupornpong, personal communication). These
findings are in agreement with the practical results of using cassava in animal diets in
 549

Thailand; there were no reported incidences of aflatoxins or other mycotoxin toxicities in

cassava diets fed to pigs, cattle and poultry including ducks. Cassava may be classified as a
clean or free-of-toxin feed ingredient for animals feeding.

5. Cost Comparison of Cassava Products to Maize and Other Cereals

Although cassava and maize are classified as energy feed ingredients, cassava
contains less protein and fat than maize. In addition, cassava contains no pigment for yolk
and skin coloring in poultry. It is necessary, therefore, to equalize the nutritive value of
cassava products before any cost comparison can be made.
Cassava-maize equivalent mixture (CMEM) is a combination of cassava, soybean
meal (SBM) and synthetic amino acids to increase the protein and amino acid content in
cassava to be equivalent to those of maize.
CMEM-1 is a mixture of 0.87 kg of cassava + 0.13 kg of soybean meal (SBM) +
0.001 kg of Dl-methionine, which supplies crude protein, amino acids and metabolizable
energy (ME) equivalent to maize.
CMEM-2 is a mixture of 0.845 kg of cassava + 0.13 kg of SBM + 0.025 kg of rice
bran oil + 0.001 kg of Dl-methionine, which also supplies crude protein, amino acids, ME
and fat equivalent to maize.
CMEM-3 is a mixture of 0.85 kg of cassava + 0.15 kg of extruded full-fat soybean
+ 0.001 kg of Dl-methionine which also supplies crude protein, amino acids, ME and fat
equivalent to maize.
The chemical compositions and prices of CMEM-1, CMEM-2, CMEM-3 and
maize are shown in Table 7.
CMEM-1 is appropriate for cost comparison of cassava to maize in swine diets
where fat content is not considered as an important factor.
CMEM-2 and 3 are appropriate for cost comparison of cassava to maize in poultry
diets where fat and linoleic acid contents are very important to the productivity of the
animals.
The feasibility of including cassava in animal feeds, therefore, depends not only on
the price of cassava itself, but also on the prices of soybean meal, extruded full-fat
soybeans, rice bran oil and the Dl-methionine as well. All the CMEM formulations contain
no pigment and the additional cost of natural or synthetic pigments need to be added when
including cassava in poultry diets.

6. Advantages of Cassava in Animal Feed Rations

Studies on the utilization of cassava for animal feeds have been conducted for more
than two decades. Oke (1978) have reported that cassava products are good energy feed
ingredients for both mono-gastric and ruminant animals. The starch in cassava is highly
digestible when compared to that of maize due to the high content of amylopectin. Cassava
can be used as a sole source energy feed ingredient in pig, poultry and ruminant diets, but
attention should be paid to HCN and protein as well as amino acid contents in cassava
products. There have been a number of studies of the use of cassava in animal rations in
Thailand and the results of the studies indicate a great potential for cassava to replace the
conventional energy feed ingredients such as maize, broken rice and sorghum, which have
commonly been used in animal diets in the region.
 550

Table 7. Ingredients, price and nutritional composition of three cassava-maize equivalent

mixtures (CMEM) as compared to those of maize.

CMEM-1 CMEM-2 CMEM-3 Maize

Ingredients (%)
Maize - - - 1.00
Cassava 0.87 0.845 0.85 -
Soybean meal 0.13 0.13 - -
Extruded full-fat soybeans - - 0.15 -
Rice bran oil - 0.25 - -
Dl-methionine 0.001 0.001 0.001 -

Price (baht/kg) 3.34 3.60 3.77 4.70

Nutritional composition
Crude protein (%) 7.5 7.5 7.5 8.0
ME-swine (Mcal/kg) 3.25 3.39 3.30 3.30
ME-poultry (Mcal/kg) 3.35 3.48 3.47 3.37
Fat (%) 0.72 3.20 3.39 3.50
Fiber (%) 4.12 4.03 3.90 2.50
Lysine (%) 0.43 0.43 0.44 0.25
Methionine + Cystine (%) 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.39
Tryptophan (%) 0.09 0.09 0.10 0.09
Threonine (%) 0.28 0.28 0.32 0.32
Calcium (%) 0.14 0.13 0.14 0.01
Available phosphorus (%) 0.07 0.20 0.22 0.30

6.1 Pigs
Khajarern and Khajarern (1986) have reported that growing-finishing pigs (17-100
kg) fed a cassava diet had lower average daily gain and a higher feed conversion ratio than
those fed with broken rice and sorghum diets, but the differences were not statistically
significant (Table 8). Pigs on cassava diets tend to have lower feed intake due to the
bulkiness of the diet, which may lead to a lower animal performance.
Chalorklang et al. (2000a) studied the effects of cassava meal substituted for
broken rice in diets for weaned pigs (4-8 weeks). Weaned pigs on a 100% cassava diet
(Diet 4) had a similar average daily weight gain and feed conversion ratio as those on the
broken rice diet (Diet 1) (Table 9). Cassava starch has been shown to be very easily
digestible by weaned pigs and produces minimum scouring and minimum unfavorable
effects to the health of the animal.
Wu (1991) fed weaned pigs, aged 28 days (7.1 kg), a daily basal protein
concentrated diet (41.0% protein) at 3% body weight together with ground cassava at 2%
body weight and found that the diet resulted in an average gain of 451 g/day and a feed
conversion ratio of 1.23.
Chalorklang et al. (2000b) also studied the effects of cassava substituted for maize
in diets for growing-finishing pigs (30-100 kg). Pigs fed a 100% cassava diet (Diet 4) had
slightly higher average daily gains but also slightly higher feed conversion ratios as
compared to those on a diet of 100% maize (Diet 1). However, the differences were not
statistically significant (Table 10). Pigs on cassava diets required less number of days to
 551

attain market weight while carcass characteristics of pigs on every experimental diet were
not significantly different.

Table 8. Effect of the utilizatin of broken rice, sorghum and cassava diets for growing-
finishing pig on their performance.

Broken rice Sorghum Cassava

Initial weight (kg) 17.04 16.68 16.89
Final weight (kg) 104.08 103.43 102.09
Average daily gain (kg) 0.62 0.61 0.52
Average daily feed intake (kg) 1.84 1.93 1.72
Feed conversion ratio 3.00 3.19 3.30
Dressing percentage 72.31 73.22 72.31
Loin-eye area (inch2) 4.55 4.55 4.62
Source: Khajarern and Khajarern. 1986.

Table 9. Effect of the substitution of broken rice by cassava meal in diets for weaned
pigs (4-8weeks) on their performance.

Diet 1 Diet 2 Diet 3 Diet 4

Levels of substitution: 0 50% 75% 100%
Levels of cassava in diets: 0 24% 34% 43%
No. of animals 8 8 8 8
Initial weight (kg) 7.35 7.46 6.75 7.70
Final weight (kg) 18.53 20.24 17.64 18.39
Total weight gain (kg) 11.23 12.40 10.78 10.69
Average daily weight gain (kg) 0.400 0.440 0.389 0.383
Total feed intake (kg) 16.02 16.84 14.41 15.06
Feed conversion ratio 1.41 1.38 1.33 1.44
Source: Chalorklang et al., 2000a.

Saesim et al. (1990) tested the effects of cassava diets and broken rice diets on the
reproductive performances of breeder pigs. The trial was conducted at the farm for a period
over one year. Sows on cassava diets had very similar reproductive performances to the
sows on broken rice diets. It is clear that cassava can be an excellent source of energy feed
ingredient in pig breeder diets (Table 11).

6.2 Broilers
Khajarern and Khajarern (1986) have demonstrated that cassava meal could be used
as a sole source of energy feed ingredient comparable to maize, broken rice and sorghum in
broiler diets (Table 12). Broilers on cassava diets tend to have smaller body weights and
poorer feed conversion ratios than those on the other diets but the differences were not
significant.

Sriwattanaworachai et al. (1989) compared the effects of maize, sorghum and

cassava diets on the performances of 4-7 week old broilers. The animals on cassava diets
had slightly poorer weight gains and feed conversion ratios than those on maize and
sorghum diets (Table 13), but the differences were not significant.
 552

Table 10. Effect of the substitution of maize by cassava meal in diets for growing-finishing
pigs (30-100 kg) on their performance.

Diet 1 Diet 2 Diet 3 Diet 4

Levels of substitution: 0 50% 75% 100%
Levels of cassava in diets (grow/finish): 0 25/28% 40/44% 53/60%
No. of animals 16 16 16 16
Initial weight (kg) 30.63 30.79 30.07 29.22
Final weight (kg) 99.50 98.22 101.03 101.71
Total weight gain (kg) 68.87 67.44 70.97 71.99
Average daily weight gain (kg) 0.773 0.813 0.818 0.812
Feed conversion ratio 3.03 3.11 3.16 3.16
No. of days tested 92 83 87 86
Dressing percentage 77.23 75.42 76.14 76.51
Lean percentage 42.97 42.96 44.17 42.50
Back-fat thickness (inch) 1.08 1.17 1.17 1.20
Source: Chalorklang et al., 2000b.

Table 11. Effect of the utilization of broken rice and cassava in diets for breeder pigs on their
reproductive performance.

Broken rice Cassava

No. of litters 504 647
Farrowing percentage 93.16 88.19
Mummified+abnormal fetus (%) 1.91 1.64
Litter size at birth 9.25 10.02
Average birth weight (kg) 1.34 1.32
No. of lactating days 23.51 23.83
Litter size at weaning 8.09 8.23
Average weight at weaning (kg) 5.46 5.73
Source: Saesim et al., 1990d.

Table 12. Effect of the utilization of maize, broken rice, sorghum and cassava in diets for
broilers on their performance.

Maize Broken rice Sorghum Cassava

No. of animals 140 140 140 140
Mortality (%) 2.14 2.14 2.80 2.86
Body weight at 8 weeks (kg) 1.70 1.68 1.70 1.64
Feed conversion ratio 2.27 2.27 2.30 2.39
Source : Khajarern and Khajarern, 1986.

Saentaweesuk et al. (2000a) studied the effects of substitution of maize by cassava

in broiler diets and found that cassava can be substituted for 50% of the maize or at levels
of 21%, 23% and 27% in broiler starter, grower and finisher rations, respectively, without
any adverse effects on the performance of the animals. Higher levels of substitution led to
a slightly but significantly (P<0.05) poorer weight gain and feed conversion ratio (Table
14). However, it is interesting to note that the trial was conducted in an open broiler
housing of a small farmer during rather hot climate. Broilers on cassava diets (Diets 2, 3
 553

and 4) were stronger, required much less medication and had lower mortality rates as
compared to those on the maize diet (Diet 1). The meat of broilers on cassava diets (Diet 2,
3 and 4) had a better perception by consumers than those on the maize diets (Diet 1). The
slightly slower growth of the animals and the minimal use of antibiotics may have
improved the meat quality of broilers on the cassava diets.

Table 13. Effect of the utilization of maize , sorghum and cassava in diets for 4-7 week old
broilers on their performance.

Maize Sorghum Cassava

No. of animals 150 150 150
Initial weight (kg) 0.448 0.444 0.458
Final weight (kg) 1.92 1.93 1.85
Average weight gain (kg) 1.47 1.47 1.40
Feed consumed (kg) 3.41 3.51 3.38
Feed conversion ratio 2.32 2.36 2.42
Mortality (%) 0 2.0 0.67
Source : Sriwattanawarachai et al., 1989.

Table 14. Effect of the substitution of maize by cassava meal in diets for broilers (1049 days)
on their performance.

Diet 1 Diet 2 Diet 3 Diet 4

Levels of substitution: 0 50% 75% 100%
Levels of cassava in diets1) 0 21/23/27% 31/35/42% 40/47/56%
No. of animals 400 400 400 400
Initial weight (g) 234.65 237.25 234.45 232.93
Final weight (g) 2,079.35a 2,003.26 a 1,815.25 b 1,846.00 b
Mortality (%) 4.50 2.00 1.98 1.50
Total weight gain (kg) 1,844.70 a 1,765.95 ab 1,580.80 a 1,613.06 bc
Total feed consumed (kg) 3,745.22 a 3,669.83 a 3,449.45 b 3,564.68 ab
Feed conversion ratio 2.03 c 2.08 bc 2.19 ab 2.21 a
1)
in starter/grower/finishing diets
Source: Saentaweesuk et al., 2000a.

Tathawan et al. (2002) found that broilers fed with cassava diets always had about
half the mortality rate than those fed with maize diets (Table 15). Broilers on a cassava
diet without antibiotics supplemention had significantly (P<0.05) lower mortality rate than
those on a maize diet with antibiotics supplementation. It has been demonstrated that
cassava diets have benefits on animal health and allow a minimal or no use of antibiotics in
animal production. This advantage is also experienced by farmers and feed millers who
have used cassava in animal diets in Thailand.
 554

Table 15. Performances and mortality rate of broilers fed with maize or cassava diets,
with or without supplementation with antibiotics.

Diets: Maize Maize Cassava Cassava

Antibiotics: + + + -
No. of chickens 198 198 198 198
Initial weight (kg/bird) 0.495 0.496 0.469 0.495
Final weight (kg/bird) 2.20 2.22 2.16 2.19
No. of days tested 28 28 28 28
Feed conversion ratio 1.86 b 1.92 ab 1.93 ab 2.00 a
Mortality (%) 8.79 ab 11.24 a 4.21 b 5.88ab
Source: Tathawan et al., 2002.

6.3 Layers
Khajarern and Khajarern (1986) have shown that cassava could be used as a sole
source of energy feed ingredient in diets of pullets and layers when compared to maize,
broken rice and sorghum (Tables 16 and 17). Pullets and layers on cassava diets had
similar performances to those on maize, broken rice and sorghum diets. The animals on
cassava diets had a low mortality rate and showed no signs of any toxicity of cassava in the
diet.

Table 16. Effect of the utilization of maize, broken rice, sorghum and cassava in diets for
pullets on their performance.

Maize Broken rice Sorghum Cassava

No. of animals 200 200 200 200
Mortality (%) 1.5 1.5 1.0 2.0
Body weight at 20 weeks (kg) 1.82 1.85 1.77 1.77
Feed conversion ratico 4.30 4.05 4.26 4.51
Source: Khajarern and Khajarern, 1986.

Table 17. Effect of the utilization of maize, broken rice , sorghum and cassava in diets for layers
on their performance.

Maize Broken rice Sorghum Cassava

Laying percentage 66.22 72.90 62.06 69.56
Egg weight (g) 50.55 50.30 50.02 50.05
Yolk color score (NEAPA) 3.50 4.67 4.50 4.15
Feed consumed (kg)/dozen eggs 1.40 1.28 1.48 1.33
Mortality (%) 1/96 1/95 2/95 0/95
Source: Khajarern and Khajarern, 1986.

Saentaweesuk et al. (200b) studied the substitution of maize by cassava in diets for
layers (22-37 weeks) (Table 18) and found that laying hens on 100% cassava diet (Diet 5)
had similar production performances to those on 100% maize diets (Diets 1 and 2).
Increasing the levels of cassava in the diets significantly (P<0.5) reduced the yolk color
score. Diet 5, in which 100% of the maize was substituted by cassava, needed to be
supplemented with 0.2% of marigold meal to provide adequate yolk pigmentation for local
 555

market acceptance. Cassava is an excellent energy feed ingredient for the production of
pale yolk eggs for exportation.

Table 18. Substitution of maize cassava meal in diets for layers (22-37 weeks) on their
performance.

Diet 1 Diet 2 Diet 3 Diet 4 Diet 51)

Levels of substitution: 0 0 50% 75% 100%
Levels of cassava in diets : 0 0 25% 36% 48%
No. of animals 576 576 576 576 575
Feed intake/hen/day (g) 114.7 115 113.6 112.8 112.4
Laying percentage 60.16 61.24 58.40 59.72 59.92
Mortality (%) 0.42 0.26 0.42 0.14 0.22
Average egg weight (g) 57.43 57.70 57.81 57.78 58.22
Yolk color score (Roche) 9.27a 9.40a 8.75b 8.36b 8.38b
1)
Supplemented with 0.2% of marigold meal
Source: Saentaweesuk et al., 2000b.

6.4 Dairy cattle

Kanchanapreuttipong et al. (2000) studied the effects of substitution of maize by
cassava in dairy concentrate rations. A total substitution of maize by cassava in the ration
produced very similar milk yield and milk composition as those cows on the maize diets
(Table 19). However, the percentage of feed cost/revenue was significantly reduced
(P<0.5) when cows were fed the cassava diets. Cassava chips and pellets are ideal energy
feed ingredients for beef and dairy cattle.

Table 19. Effect of substitution of maize by cassava chips in concentrate diets for dairy cattle
on their performance.

Diets: Maize Maize + Cassava Cassava

Levels of substitution : 100% 50%:50% 100%
Milk composition, % (kg/day)
Butter fat 4.15 (0.80) 4.32 (0.85) 4.27 (0.83)
Milk protein 3.37 (0.65) 3.27 (0.64) 3.33 (0.65)
Lactose 4.97 (0.76) 4.93 (0.97) 4.96 (0.97)
Minerals 0.70 (0.13) 0.70 (0.14) 0.70 (0.14)
Solid non-fat 9.03 (1.74) 8.90 (1.75) 8.99 (1.75)
Total solids 13.19 (2.54) 13.23 (2.60) 13.26 (2.58)

Milk yield (kg/day) 19.23 19.64 19.44

Feed cost/revenue (%) 40.75a 34.33ab 28.17b
Source: Kanchanapreuttipong et al., 2000.

6.5 Aquaculture feed

Jintasataporn et al. (2000) evaluated the effects of substitution of maize by cassava
in diets for hybrid catfish, and reported that the fish on 100% cassava (Diet 4) had similar
production performances as those on 100% maize (Diet 1) (Table 20).
 556

Table 20. Effect of substitution of maize by cassava meal in diets for hybrid catfish on their
performance.

Diet 1 Diet 2 Diet 3 Diet 4

Levels of substitution: 0 50% 75% 100%
Levels of cassava in diets: 0 13% 20% 26%
Total weight gain (g/fish) 84.06 82.96 80.46 98.80
Average daily weight gain 0.70 0.69 0.67 0.82
Total feed consumed (g/fish) 144 115 147 176
Feed conversion ratio 1.72 1.36 1.83 1.79
Survival rate (%) 88.6 90.3 86.1 98.9
Source: Jintasataporn et al., 2000.

It can be concluded that cassava can be used as a sole source of energy feed
ingredient in every kind of animal ration, including pigs, poultry, ruminants and
aquaculture feeds. The inclusion rate of cassava in the animal rations are summarized in
Table 21. However, care should be taken on the use of cassava for broiler rations, since
fowls are sensitive to bulkiness and to the fiber contents of the feed; therefore, cassava is
recommended to replace only 50% of maize (25-30% inclusion of cassava) in broiler diets.

Table 21. Recommended maximum inclusion levels of cassava meal in the feed rations of
various animals.

Animal rations Max. inclusion levels (%)

Pigs (weaners, grower, finisher, breeder) 40 - 60
Broilers 25 - 30
Layer hens 40 - 45
Ducks (meat and layers, breeders) 40 - 45
Beef and dairy cattle 35 - 40
Aquaculture 30 - 35
Note: Cassava has also been successfully used as a maize substitute in rabbit and horse feeds.

7. Practical Experiences in Using Cassava in Animal Feed Rations in Thailand

Cassava has been promoted as a replacement for maize in pig, poultry and ruminant
diets in Thailand for more than 15 years. Initially only a limited number of farmers adopted
and practiced the technology, but the results were very successful. Extensive use of
cassava in animal rations has been practiced since 1997 when both the animal production
and the feed industries were severely affected by the economic crisis. The devaluation of
the Thai currency had resulted in an increase in feed costs and the cost of animal
production while the local market prices of feed ingredients were reduced. In contrast, the
exported price of cassava to the EU was also reduced due to the reduction of agricultural
subsidies in the EU countries. The use of cassava in domestic animal diets was therefore
the solution to various problems.
Cassava has been actively promoted for use in animal diets by the Animal Nutrition
Research and Development Center (ANRDC), Kasetsart University, Kampaengsaen,
Nakhon Pathom with a research grant from the Thai Tapioca Development Institute
(TTDI). Seminars and workshops on the utilization of cassava in combination with soybean
meal in animal rations have been conducted repeatedly in various parts of Thailand. Books
 557

and a video on the utilization of cassava and soybean meal in animal rations have been
prepared and distributed to the farmers. Follow-up evaluations need to be conducted in
order to correct the field problems and to ensure the success of the project. In addition,
improvement of the quality of cassava chips produced in Thailand has been promoted in
order to satisfy the requirement of the animal industry. Good quality cassava chips and
pellets, which are key factors for the successful use of cassava in animal diets, are
increasingly available in the country and are helping to increase the acceptance of cassava
in the feed industry. To date cassava has been extensively accepted in animal feed rations
in Thailand, including for growing-finishing, breeder and weaned pigs, layer hens and
ducks, meat-type ducks, and dairy and beef cattle, with successful results and satisfaction to
the farmers.
Cassava is an appropriate feed ingredient for pigs, ducks and cattle because these
animals can tolerate high levels of dietary crude fiber and require no pigmentation in the
diets (except for laying ducks). Acceptance of using cassava in animal feed rations is now
widespread among farmers, ranging from small farmers (10-20 sows unit) to large
commercial farmers (over 10,000 sows unit) with rather equally successful results. It is
worthy to note that most of the farmers are satisfied with the following advantages of using
cassava in their animal rations.
1. Satisfactory animal performances and carcass quality while the feed cost and
animal production cost are reduced.
2. Reduction of medication and antibiotics used in animal production, and the
improvement of animal health induced by cassava diets.
3. Reduction of the fetid smell of the manure and reduction of environmental
pollution.
In many occasions when there were no differences in the prices between maize and
cassava diets, a number of farmers still maintained the use of cassava in animal rations due
to the advantages of animal health improvement and less smell and pollution as a result of
the cassava diets. A number of pig and poultry (broiler) farms have used cassava as their
main feed ingredient in the diets for production of antibiotics-free pork and poultry meat.

8. Advantages of Using Cassava in Animal Diets

The results of the past studies and the practical field trials have indicated that good-
quality cassava has the following advantages in animal nutrition:

8.1 Comparable performance but higher quality of animal products than maize diet
Good-quality cassava with proper nutritional balance, obtained by good diet
processing, has produced very comparable production performances of the animals as
compared to those on cereal diets. But farmers always reported that cassava diets produced
better quality animal products including meat, milk and eggs. Although no scientific
explanation can be made, the favorable results may be due to less stress situation for
animals on cassava diets.

8.2 Higher digestible starch

The starch in cassava is a very soft starch, which is more readily gelatinized and
digested in the digestive tract of the animals as compared to cereal starches. Highly
digestible starch create less stress to the animals and stimulate more growth of non-
 558

pathogenic microorganisms which will produce more acidic conditions and suppress the
growth of pathogenic microorganisms in the digestive tract.

8.3 Minimum or no mycotoxins contamination

It has been shown that cassava products contain minimal or no mycotoxins,
including aflatoxins, when compared to cereals, especially maize. Cassava has been
successfully fed to breeder animals and ducks which are very sensitive to mycotoxin
toxicities, expecially zearalenone and aflatoxins. Apparently, no aflotoxicosis or toxicity of
other mycotoxins have been reported by the farmers who have employed cassava in animal
diets for many years. Aflatoxin is a powerful stressor in animal diets, which not only
reduces the performance of animals, especially their feed conversion ratio, but also impairs
immunity production and causes more illness in the animals. Modern high-performance
animals always are more sensitive to stress including aflatoxins in the diets. The animals,
therefore, require feeds which are not only nutritionally balanced and highly digestible but
also contain no or very low levels of toxic substances which cause stress to the animals.
Cassava is an ideal feed ingredient meeting this requirement.

8.4 Animal health improvement and green food production

Animals on cassava diets always have better health and require less or no
antibiotics during production, compared to animals on cereals, especially on maize diets.
The highly digestible starch and minimal aflatoxin contamination could be responsible for
this advantage. Cassava diets can therefore provide green meat or green food
production which is an important consideration for animal production in this new
millennium.

8.5 Minimum animal waste odor

Practical field trials have shown that manure or feces of animals on cassava diets
produce less fetid smell or have less odor than those on cereal diets. Although the exact
reasons are not known, the advantage helps to reduce the pollution problems of animal
production units.

8.6 Non-GMO feed ingredient

Cassava varieties grown in Thailand have been produced through traditional
breeding methodologies and are certified to be non-GMO. Cassava products can therefore
be used in animal production for export, especially to EU countries.

8.7 Reduction of animal production costs

Cassava diets lower the cost of animal production, not only by the reduction of feed
cost but also by the reduction or elimination of the use of antibiotics and medication in
animal production. This advantage is an important factor for farmer acceptance, and for
more utilization of cassava in animal diets in Thailand and in the rest of the world.

9. Key Factors For Successful Use of Cassava in Animal Feed Rations

Although cassava is an energy feed ingredient comparable to maize, cassava has
many other characteristics that affect its utilization in animal diets. It is therefore necessary
 559

to have a thorough understanding of cassava in order to successfully use the ingredient in

animal rations.

9.1 Production of good quality cassava chips and pellets

Only good quality cassava which has the following specification is recommended
for inclusion in animal diets:
Moisture content max. 14%
Crude protein content min. 1.5-2.0%
Crude fiber content max. 3.50-4.00%
Ash content max. 2.00%
The above cassava products will contain 75-80% nitrogen-free extract and give
very good results for animal feeding. Cassava chips that have minimal or no stem or woody
parts will have crude fiber levels below this limit. High levels of sand or soil contamination
will increase the ash content in the cassava products. The products should be dried for at
least 3-6 days and should be stored for at least 5-6 days before being included in animal
rations. Cassava products should be clean and have no visible mold growth. With enough
experience, one can estimate the starch content by breaking a piece off dry cassava chip.

9.2 Feed formulation

Cassava diets should be balanced for protein and essential amino acids according
to the requirement of each type of animals. Weight by weight substitution of cassava for
maize in animal diets will lead to lower protein and amino acids contents of the diet and
cause poor growth, poor feed conversion ratios, poor carcass quality and poor productivity
of the animals. More soybean meal or extruded full-fat soybean need to be added when
employing cassava diets. Cassava-soybean diets with a proper balance of amino acids have
been used successfully by pig farmers in Thailand.

9.3. Grinding and reduction of dustiness

Cassava chips are very bulky and contain soft starch. Grinding of cassava chips is
always very dusty and causes severe air pollution in the feed mill. Dust collection units of
either the cyclone dust collector with filter bags or the automatic filter bag dust collector is
required to prevent spreading the dust into the atmosphere. Ground cassava is still very
dusty and always reduces the feed intake of animals raised on mashed cassava diets. Dusty
feed will stimulate animals to drink more water which impairs feed intake and causes
growth depression of the animals. Addition of 4-5% molasses in the diet is recommended in
order to eliminate the dustiness of the feed. High levels of fat addition in the diets would
decrease the levels of molasses required for dust control in mashed cassava diets. Pelleted
feed or wet feed give no problems of dust and do not need molasses addition in the
formula.

9.4 Body fat adjustment

Cassava diets may contain very low fat and may cause hard fat accumulation in
the animal body. In countries where hard carcass fat is avoided, it is advisable that cassava
diets contain at least 3% of softfat in order to correct the fat condition in the animal. High-
fat feed ingredients such as rice bran, extruded full-fat soybean or rice bran oil are
recommended to be included in the cassava diets.
 560

9.5 Yolk and skin color of poultry

Cassava contains no pigment and the diet may cause pale egg yolk and pale skin of
the poultry. Cassava diets may have to be supplemented with sources of pigment such as
leucaena leaf meal, marigold meal or synthetic pigments in order to color the yolk and skin
according to the requirements of the consumers. The required supplementation is
approximately 30 mg of xanthophyl/kg of diet.

10. National Program on Cassava Chips and Pellets Quality Improvement and
Quality Assurance in Thailand
Good quality cassava is an important factor for the successful use of cassava in
animal diets. The government of Thailand is therefore launching a national program on the
promotion of good quality cassava chips and pellets production in the country, both for
domestic use and for export. Good quality cassava chips should conform to the following
standard :
Moisture max. 14%
Crude fiber max. 3.5-4.0%
Sand/ash max. 2.0%
Starch (NFE) min. 75-80%
Cassava products containing minimal levels of crude fiber and sand/ash will be
good substitutes for cereals in animal diets. Governmental offices and organizations related
to cassava production, utilization and trading are involved in the program and carry out the
following activities:

10.1 Department of Foreign Trade (DFT), Ministry of Commerce

DFT is providing a total of 120 million baht in soft loans to 300 commercial
cassava chips/pellets processors for installation of sand sifters into the production process,
which will reduce the content of sand in the cassava products to less than 2%. The
processors also need to reduce the fiber content of the cassava products to less than 3.50-
4.00%. DFT, together with ANRDC and TTDI, will test, monitor and certify processors
who consistently produce good quality cassava chips according to the above standard. The
project aims to produce a minimum of 3 million tonnes of good quality cassava chips
annually.

10.2 Department of Cooperative Promotion (DCP), Ministry of Agriculture and

Cooperatives
DCP is providing a total of 426 million baht in soft loans to 60 agricultural
cooperatives who grow and process good quality cassava chips. The cooperatives may be
directly involved in the production of good quality cassava chips, or in collection of good
quality cassava chips produced by the members or villagers, and market these to the users.
Cassava growers (farmers) are encouraged to partly process the fresh roots for good quality
cassava chips which will produce an additional income to the families. Cassava chips
produced by these farmers or villagers are always of high quality and are in great demand
by the animal farms and feed mills. DCP and ANRDC will continuously and regularly test,
monitor and certify the cooperatives who consistently produce good quality cassava chips
 561

according to the standard. The project will produce approximately 300,000-500,000 tonnes
of good quality cassava chips annually for domestic consumption and for export.

10.3 Animal Nutrition Research and Development Center (ANRDC), Kasetsart

University, and the Thai Tapioca Development Institute (TTDI)
ANRDC and TTDI have been pioneers in promoting the production of clean and
good quality cassava chips for the animal feed industry in Thailand since 1998. A number
of cassava processors, ranging from small villagers to large commercial processors, have
joined the project and have improved the quality of cassava chips for the animal feed
industry in the country. The project not only has demonstrated the benefit of high-quality
cassava for animal feeding to the farmers, but has also provided assurances for the future
production of good-quality cassava for the animal feed industry. ANRDC and TTDI have
not only provided training and supervision in techniques and practices in the production of
good quality cassava chips but have also tested and monitored the quality of the products
produced, by direct sampling from the processors and by analyzing samples sent by the
customers. Good processors, which consistently produce good quality products, are
publicized directly to the farmers and to the feed industry.
ANRDC and TTDI will continue their activities in promoting the greater utilization
of good quality cassava for animal feeds. Seminars and workshop on utilization of cassava
in animal nutrition are conducted throughout the country. More research on the beneficial
effects of cassava diets on the health of animals is being conducted. The results of recent
advances in using cassava in animal diets and the names of certified cassava processors are
publicized via www. tapiocafeed.com.

10.4 Office of Industrial Standard (OIS), Ministry of Industry, and Department of

Livestock Development (DLD), Ministry of Agriculture and Co-operatives
OIS and DLD, which are authorized organizations to certify the standard of
manufacturing practices and the standard quality of industrial products including animal
feeds, have planned to improve cassava pellet production practices and to certify GMP and
HACCP to processors who meet the standard. The certifications are essential for export of
cassava products to the EU. Cassava pellet processors and exporters will be trained and
monitored, and improvements will be made in the production process until the standards
are met and certification can be provided. The activity is expected to be completed before
December 31, 2001.
The government of Thailand expects that these national programs will result in an
increase in the production of high quality cassava products, in increasing the use of cassava
in animal feed in the country and in increasing the export of cassava products to the EU and
other countries. The programs will also provide a sustainable marketing strategy and
practice for the cassava industry in Thailand.

For more information please contact :

1. Department of Foreign Trade, Ministry of Commerce
Tel. +66-2-547 4733-7 Fax +66-2-547 4736
2. Thai Tapioca Trade Association (TTTA)
Tel. +66-2-234 4724 Fax +66-2-236 6084
3. Thai Tapioca Development Institute (TTDI)
 562

Tel. +66-2-679 9112 Fax +66-2-679 9117

4. Animal Nutrition Research and Development Center (ANRDC), Kasetsart University,
Kampaengsaen, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand.
Tel. +66-34-352035 Fax +66-2-352037

REFERENCES
Chalorklang, A., U. Kanto, S. Tabchareon, S. Juttupornpong and L. Meksongsee. 2000a.
Substitution of cassava meal for broken rice in weaned pig diets. In: Proc. 38th Kasetsart
University Conference, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand. (in Thai)
Chalorklang, A., U. Kanto, S. Tabchareon, S. Juttupornpong and L. Meksongsee. 2000b.
Substitution of cassava meal for corn in growing-finishing pig diets. In: Proc. 38th Kasetsart
University Conference, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand. (in Thai)
Jintasataporn, A., U. Kanto, S. Juttupornpong and W. Chow. 2000. Substitution of cassava for corn
in hybrid catfish diets. In: Cassava for Animal Feed Project. 1999 Annual Report. Thai Tapioca
Development Institute, Bangkok, Thailand. (in Thai)
Kanchanapreuttipon, J., U. Kanto, S. Juttupornpong and W. Chow. 2000. Substitution of cassava for
corn in dairy concentrates diets. In: Cassava for Animal Feed Project. 1999 Annual Report.
Thai Tapioca Development Institute, Bangkok, Thailand. (in Thai)
Kanto, U. 1986. Pigs and Poultry Nutrition and Their Feed Production, 2nd Edition. Kasetsart
University, Kampaeng Saen, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand. 312 p .
Khajarern, J., S. Khajarern, K. Bunsiddhi and P. Sakiya. 1979. Determination of basic chemical
parameters of cassava root products of different origin, processing technology and quality. In:
KKUIDRC Cassava/Nutrition Project. 1978 Annual Report. Khon Kaen University, Khon
Kaen, Thailand. pp. 13 32.
Khajarern, J., S. Khajarern, A. Sivapraphagon and L. Nandhapipat. 1982. A survey on the changes
in chemical composition of cassava root products in Khon Kaen region in 1980. In: KKU
IDRC Cassava/Nutrition Project. 1976 Annual Report. Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen,
Thailand. pp. 2229.
Khajarern, S. and J. Khajarern 1986. Utilization of cassava for animal feed. In: Proc. 24th Kasetsart
University Conference, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand. pp. 6472. (in Thai)
Laosriratanachai, A. 1986. Utilization of protein enriched cassava (PEC) for diets of growing rats
and pigs. MSc thesis. Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Lokaewmanee, S., U. Kanto and S. Juttupornpong. 2002. A study on metabolizable energy (ME) of
cassava chips in broiler diets. In: Proc. 40th Kasetsart University Conference, Kasetsart
University, Bangkok, Thailand. (in Thai)
Oke, O.L. 1978 Problem in the use of cassava as animal feed. Anim. Feed Sci. Tech. 3 : 345380.
Phansurin, K., U. Kanto and S. Juttupornpong. 2002. A study on metabolizable energy (ME) of
cassava chips in growing-finishing pig diets. In: Proc. 40th Kasetsart University Conference,
Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand. (in Thai)
Reas, B.P. 1996. A study on the comparative digestibility of cassava, maize, sorghum and barley in
growing pigs. Master of Veterinary Studies thesis, University of Queensland, Australia.
Saentaweesuk, S., U. Kanto, S. Juttupornpong and P. Harinsut. 2000a. Substitution of cassava meal
for corn in broiler diets. In: Proc. 38th Kasetsart University Conference, Kasetsart University,
Bangkok, Thailand. (in Thai)
Saentaweesuk, S., U. Kanto, S. Juttupornpong and P. Harinsut. 2000b. Substitution of cassava meal
for corn in layer diets. In: Proc. 38th Kasetsart University Conference, Kasetsart University,
Bangkok, Thailand. (in Thai)
Saesim, P., U. Kanto and N. Sukmanee. 1990. Utilization of cassava in gestating and lactating sow
diets. Pig Magazine 66: 511. (in Thai)
 563

Scudamore, K.A., M.I. Hetmanski, H.K. Chan and S. Collins. 1997. Occurrence of mycotoxins in
raw ingredients used for animal feeding stuffs in the United Kingdom in 1992. Food Additives
and Contaminants 14: 167-173.
Tathawan, S., S. Moonchaisuk, N. Tanasrisutarat, U. Kanto and S. Juttupornpong. 2002. A
comparative study of corn and cassava diets both supplemented and unsupplemented with
antibiotic on performance and mortality rate of broilers. In: Proc. 40th Kasetsart University
Conference, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand. (in Thai)
Wu, J.F. 1991. Energy value of cassava for young swine. J. Anim. Sci. 69: 1349-1353.