0500 First Language English: MARK SCHEME For The May/June 2011 Question Paper For The Guidance of Teachers
0500 First Language English: MARK SCHEME For The May/June 2011 Question Paper For The Guidance of Teachers
0500 First Language English: MARK SCHEME For The May/June 2011 Question Paper For The Guidance of Teachers
w
w
.X
tr
me
eP
UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE INTERNATIONAL EXAMINATIONS
ap
er
International General Certificate of Secondary Education
s.c
om
MARK SCHEME for the May/June 2011 question paper
for the guidance of teachers
This mark scheme is published as an aid to teachers and candidates, to indicate the requirements of
the examination. It shows the basis on which Examiners were instructed to award marks. It does not
indicate the details of the discussions that took place at an Examiners meeting before marking began,
which would have considered the acceptability of alternative answers.
Mark schemes must be read in conjunction with the question papers and the report on the
examination.
Cambridge will not enter into discussions or correspondence in connection with these mark schemes.
Cambridge is publishing the mark schemes for the May/June 2011 question papers for most IGCSE,
GCE Advanced Level and Advanced Subsidiary Level syllabuses and some Ordinary Level
syllabuses.
Page 2 Mark Scheme: Teachers version Syllabus Paper
IGCSE May/June 2011 0500 31
Note: All Examiners are instructed that alternative correct answers and unexpected approaches in
candidates scripts must be given marks that fairly reflect the relevant knowledge and skills
demonstrated.
Question 1
Read the following transcript from a radio programme, which is an interview with the editor
of World Wonders, a book of records published annually.
Imagine that you have heard the discussion. Write a letter to the producer of the programme
to express your views on whether or not such books should exist.
Base what you write on the ideas in the transcript and be careful to use your own words.
You should write between 1 and 2 sides, allowing for the size of your handwriting.
Up to ten marks are available for the content of your answer and up to fifteen marks for the
quality of your writing. [25]
B Interviewers objections
positive:
satisfies natural curiosity
censorship is always a bad thing/people should be able to choose whether to buy it
people have the right to decide whether to take risks to compete for a place in it
modern world has a growing appetite for real life situations, as in reality TV
teenagers who dont otherwise read much enjoy reading this kind of material.
negative:
no need for it now the internet exists
encourages unwholesome interest in fates of record holders rather than the records
governed by commercial factors/launching online edition as well
ethical policy is being reviewed so some banned records will now return
after more than 40 years, its time to move on/old fashioned concept.
The discriminator is where where the candidate has to evaluate the two sides and form an argument
of their own (C). Candidates ideas and opinions must, however, remain connected to the passage,
while developing its claims and assessing their implications. The arguments in the letter should be
clear and persuasive.
Band 1 910 Makes a thorough, perceptive, convincing evaluation of the ideas in the
interview. Reads effectively between the lines. Develops the reading material
and integrates it into the argument.
Band 2 78 A good evaluation of the passage, using reading material to support the
argument. Occasionally effective development of some of the ideas in the
material.
Band 3 56 A reasonable response, referring to a number of points. Candidates cover the
material satisfactorily, but may miss opportunities to develop it relevantly or at
length.
Band 4 34 Selects points from the passage rather literally and/or uses material thinly.
Does not combine points into an effective response.
Band 5 12 Parts of the answer are relevant, though material may be repeated injudiciously,
or wrongly used.
Band 6 0 Answer does not relate to question and/or too much unselective copying directly
from the material to gain a mark in Band 5.
First variant Mark Scheme
Use the following table to give a mark out of 15 for Writing.
Band 1 1315 Excellent, consistent sense of audience; persuasive/authoritative style; very fit
for purpose. Fluent, varied sentences/wide range of vocabulary. Strong sense of
structure and sequence. Virtually no error.
Band 2 1012 Sense of audience mostly secure; quite stylish and fluent; sense of overall
structure; arguments occasionally well developed. Writing is mainly accurate;
sentences mostly fluent/complex sentences/range of vocabulary/occasional
error/mostly well sequenced.
Band 3 89 Recognisable sense of audience; mostly written in accurate, if fairly
straightforward language; some argument based on material apparent; mostly
quite well structured. Errors minor; language straightforward but effective;
vocabulary fit for task.
Band 4 57 Appropriate if sometimes inconsistent style; sentences mainly accurate; fact
rather than argument; basic structure: has beginning, middle and end; fairly
frequent (minor) errors; language and vocabulary simple with occasional
attempts at argument.
Band 5 34 Functional expression; facts selected and occasionally listed; has a beginning,
but main part of response is not always well sequenced. Some serious errors in
grammar/punctuation/use of vocabulary. Errors slightly intrusive.
Band 6 12 Language and style not clear; some blurring and lack of order. Despite some
serious errors, can mainly be followed. Simple sentences.
Band 7 0 Serious inaccuracies and problems with language and grammar are too
intrusive to gain a mark in Band 6.
First variant Mark Scheme
Section 2: Composition
Remember that these marks will not necessarily be equal, and one mark may well be (much) higher
than the other, for a variety of reasons.
The maximum overall mark for the Composition is 25. Write the total clearly at the end as
follows: C7 + S10 = 17 (C standing for Content, S standing for Style).
It is important that marking is not bunched: do not be reluctant to award marks in the top and bottom
bands.
Argumentative/discursive writing
2 (a) Are you glad to be living at the present time or would you prefer to have been alive in
a previous historical period? Explain the reasons for your choice. [25]
OR
(b) The world is changed by the small actions of ordinary people, not by the big actions
of important people. Discuss this claim. [25]
Descriptive writing
3 (a) You arrive on an island. Write a description of your first impressions of the place and
its people. [25]
OR
(b) Describe what you see and hear from a hiding place. [25]
Narrative writing
4 (a) You witness an incident which you are forced to get involved in. Use this idea as a
basis for a narrative. [25]
OR
Band 5 A few relevant points Content is relevant but A simple narrative with
34 are made and may be lacking in scope or a beginning, middle and
expanded into variety. Opportunities to end; it may consist of
paragraphs, but provide development and everyday happenings or
development is very detail are frequently fantastic, non-engaging
simple and not always missed. events. Content may
logical. seem immature.
The overall structure,
There is weakness of though readily Unequal or
sequencing overall and discernible, lacks form inappropriate
within paragraphs. and dimension. importance is given to
Paragraphing is Paragraphing is parts of the story.
inconsistent. Repetition inconsistent. The Paragraphing is
and a failure to sustain reliance on identifying inconsistent. Dialogue
relevant argument are events, objects and/or may be used
obvious. people sometimes leads ineffectively. There is no
to a sequence of real climax. Sentence
sentences without sequences are used only
progression. to link simple series of
events.
Band 6 A few points are Some relevant facts are Stories are very simple
12 discernible but any identified, but the overall and narrate events
attempt to develop them picture is unclear and indiscriminately, with
is very limited. development is very very little development.
limited. Endings are simple and
Overall argument only lack effect.
progresses here and There are examples of
there and the sequence sequenced sentences, The shape of the
of sentences is poor. but there is also narrative is unclear;
repetition and muddled some of the content has
ordering. no relevance to the plot.
Sequences of sentences
are sometimes poor,
leading to a lack of
clarity.
0 Rarely relevant, little Rarely relevant, little Rarely relevant, little
material, and presented material, and presented material, and presented
in a disorderly structure. in a disorderly structure. in a disorderly structure.
Not sufficient to be Not sufficient to be Not sufficient to be
placed in Band 6. placed in Band 6. placed in Band 6.
Band 1 1112 Writing is consistent, stylistically fluent, linguistically strong and accurate;
has sense of audience