Fencing Oman With Block Footing - 03072013
Fencing Oman With Block Footing - 03072013
Fencing Oman With Block Footing - 03072013
Remarks
V site = 40 m/sec 144 kmph (Assumed)
H/p = 1.24
Multipliers
Posts 1 to 3 = 2 (Figure A.9)
Posts 4 to 6 = 1.5 (Figure A.9)
All other = 1 (Figure A.9)
Recommendations
Refer Table C1 of HA 66/95, for all other intermediate posts
For footing size of 0.6m Depth of embedment into soil 0.9 m
For footing size of 0.8m Depth of embedment into soil 0.8 m
For footing size of 1.0m Depth of embedment into soil 0.7 m
CALCULATION OF WIND LOADS NAD SELECTION OF FOOTING SIZE GIFFORD
Fetch, Scs = 0.84 (distance > 100km from sea) Figure A.2 of HA 66/95
Sct & Stct are not required (Town reduction factors)
g gust = 1.00 (For post & panel structures)
Stsc = 0.215 (distance > 100km from sea) Figure A.4 of HA 66/95
Stb = 1.02 (0.84*(1+1*0.215))
Vref = 51.0 m/sec 183.71 kmph (1.02*50)
H/p = 1.03
Multipliers
Posts 1 to 3 = 2 (Figure A.9 of HA 66/95)
Posts 4 to 6 = 1.5 (Figure A.9 of HA 66/95)
All other = 1 (Figure A.9 of HA 66/95)
Wind load on
Posts 1 to 3 = 12.68 kN (Considering 34.0 % blockage)
Posts 4 to 6 = 9.51 kN (Considering 34.0 % blockage)
All other = 6.34 kN (Considering 34.0 % blockage)
Ht of cg
above Moment
Blocked P, bas ground about GL
Item area (m2) (kN) (m) (kN-m)
Fence 2.575 5.72 1.66 9.482
Spike 0.153 0.34 2.98 1.009
Coils 0.090 0.20 3.44 0.689
Total 6.26 11.18
Table C1 of HA 66/95 shows experimental data for a range of footing sizes and their depth of embedments
against the safe bending moments at the footing base.
From Table C1 of HA66/95, footing with a square size of 850mmx850mm is found adequate for all post
locations apart from 1 to 6. Post locations from 1 to 6 at the ends of the fence should be provided with
rigid stays to reduce/check the moments on the base of the posts and post foundations.
Although, the table neglects, the top 300mm of soil by considering this layer to be uncompacted, it is
presumed that the soil is fully compacted upto the top of ground as marked in the drawings, to enable the
footing derive resistance from the sorrounding soil along full depth of its embedment.
It should also be noted that the safe design moments, mentioned in the Table C1 & figures C3 & C4 already
include a factor of safety of 2, to ensure the foundations do not significantly rotate due to the overturning
moments.
GIFFORD
.60*2.5146*2.44)
of HA 66/95)
of HA 66/95)
of HA 66/95)
th of embedments
uate for all post
e provided with
mpacted, it is
ings, to enable the
Fetch, Scs = 0.84 (distance > 100km from sea) Figure A.2
Sct & Stct are not required (Town reduction factors)
g gust = 1.00 (For post & panel structures)
Stsc = 0.215 (distance > 100km from sea) Figure A.4
Stb = 1.02 (0.84*(1+1*0.215))
Vref = 51.0 m/sec 183.71 kmph (1.02*50)
H/p = 1.03
Multipliers
Posts 1 to 3 = 2 (Figure A.9)
Posts 4 to 6 = 1.5 (Figure A.9)
All other = 1 (Figure A.9)
Wind load on
Posts 1 to 3 = 12.68 kN (Considering 34.0 % blockage)
Posts 4 to 6 = 9.51 kN (Considering 34.0 % blockage)
All other = 6.34 kN (Considering 34.0 % blockage)
Moment
Blocked P, bas about GL
Item area (m2) (kN) LA (m) (kN-m)
Fence 2.575 5.72 2.46 14.059
Spike 0.153 0.34 3.71 1.259
Coils 0.090 0.20 3.71 0.744
Total 6.26 16.06
Size of footing
B= 1.5 m
D= 2m
t= 0.3 m
Zl = 1.0 m3
A= 3 m2
Wt of the footing = 2.25 t
270.4163
DESIGN OF TIE BEAMS
The tie beams are provided with lifting holes spaced 1.22m apart. The lifting hooks
shall be placed at these locations to lift the precast footing units and be placed at
the respective locations at site.
References :
1 Dimensional drawing of the security fence foundations
2 BS 5400:1990
Structural idealisation :
One unit of the precast foundation block is considered for analysis. The unit is
idealised in a single line, with supports placed at the position of the lifting hooks.
The member properties are assigned according to the sizes of the footings and the
tie beams at respective locations
Material specifications
Grade of concrete
Tie beams C 30/20
Footing C 30/20
Reinforcement 460 Mpa
Moment and Shear are summaried for unfactored loads obtained from Staad Analysis are as below
Bending Moment (kNm) 1 Hogging
Shear force (kN) 1.5
Bending Moment (kNm) 1 Sagging
Load factors considered are as below
g fl For ULS = 1.15 Table 1 of BD 37/01
For SLS = 1.0
The ULS and SLS cases are checked out by using Gifford Bridge Tools- RCSECT and the results are summarised below
Ult. Moment Capacity of the Section 55.5 kNm > 1.265 Hence Safe ULS hogging moment case
55.5 kNm > 1.265 Hence Safe ULS sagging moment case
Shear Capacity 151.5 kN > 1.90 Hence Safe ULS case
Crack Width 0 mm < 0.25 Hence Safe
The results as obtained from RC sect program is presented below
DESIGN OF FOOTING BLOCK
The column section is considered to be square with the following dimensions. The effect of
the chamfers is neglected.
h Overall depth of the section = 850 mm
b Breadth of the section = 630 mm
d Depth of the footing = 1250 mm
Material specifications
Grade of concrete
Tie beams C 30/20
Footing C 30/20
Reinforcement 460 Mpa
Total length
of horizontal wires = (2.5146/(12.7/1000)+1)*2.44 = 485.56 m
Total length
of horizontal wires = 32*2.5146 = 80 m
Diameter of the wires = 0.003 m
Since (h/2-d2) < e, the section is checked as per Art 5.5.3.5 (b) of BS 5400-4 : 1990
The ULS and SLS cases are checked out by using Gifford Bridge Tools- RCSECT and the results are summarised below
Ult. Moment Capacity of the Section 65.4 kNm > 38.914 Hence Safe
Shear Capacity 159.1 kN > 13.95 Hence Safe
Crack Width 0 mm < 0.25 Hence Safe
The results as obtained from RC sect program is presented below