Introduction or Background and Justification: Clearly Define The Project's Aims and Objectives
Introduction or Background and Justification: Clearly Define The Project's Aims and Objectives
Introduction or Background and Justification: Clearly Define The Project's Aims and Objectives
The introduction is the part of the paper that provides readers with the background information for the
research reported in the paper. Its purpose is to establish a framework for the research, so that readers can
understand how it is related to other research.
In an introduction, the writer should:
create reader interest in the topic,
lay the broad foundation for the problem that leads to the study,
place the study within the larger context of the scholarly literature, and
Reach out to a specific audience.
The problem statement describes the context for the study and it also identifies the general analysis
approach. A problem might be defined as the issue that exists in the literature, theory, or practice that
leads to a need for the study. It is important in a proposal that the problem stand outthat the reader can
easily recognize it. Sometimes, obscure and poorly formulated problems are masked in an extended
discussion. In such cases, reviewers and/or committee members will have difficulty recognizing the
problem. State the problem in terms intelligible to someone who is generally sophisticated but who may
be relatively uninformed in the area of your investigation. Effective problem statements answer the
question Why does this research need to be conducted. If a researcher is unable to answer this question
clearly and succinctly, and without focusing on problems of macro or global proportions that certainly
will not be informed or alleviated by the study, then the statement of the problem will come off as
ambiguous and diffuse
The review of the literature provides the background and context for the research problem. It should
establish the need for the research and indicate that the writer is knowledgeable about the area.
The literature review accomplishes several important things:
It relates a study to the larger, ongoing dialogue in the literature about a topic, filling in gaps and
extending prior studies.
It shares with the reader the results of other studies that are closely related to the study being
reported.
It provides a framework for establishing the importance of the study, as well as a benchmark for
comparing the results of a study with other findings.
It frames the problem earlier identified.
Demonstrate to the reader that you have a comprehensive grasp of the field and are aware of important
recent substantive and methodological developments. Indicate how your study will refine, revise, or
extend the state of the art. Avoid statements that imply that little has been done in the area or that what
has been done is too extensive to permit easy summary. Statements of this sort are usually taken as
indications that the writer is not really familiar with the literature. In a proposal, the literature review is
generally brief and to the point. Be judicious in your choice of exemplarsthe literature selected
should be pertinent and relevant. Select and reference only the more appropriate citations. Make
key points clearly and succinctly.
Research Questions are most often used in qualitative inquiry, although their use in quantitative inquiry
is becoming more prominent. Hypotheses are relevant to theoretical research and are typically used only
in quantitative inquiry. When a writer states hypotheses, the reader is entitled to have an exposition of the
theory that lead to them (and of the assumptions underlying the theory). Just as conclusions must be
grounded in the data, hypotheses must be grounded in the theoretical framework.
Research Methodology
The methodology section is really the heart of the research proposal. The activities should be described
with as much detail as possible, and the continuity between them should be apparent. Indicate the
methodological steps you will take to answer every question or to test every hypothesis illustrated in the
Questions/Hypotheses section.
Instrumentation
Outline the instruments you propose to use (materials and facilities, surveys, scales, interview protocols,
observation grids). When particular measurement instruments have previously been used, identify
previous studies and findings related to reliability and validity. If instruments have not previously been
used, outline procedures you will follow to develop and test their reliability and validity. In the latter case,
a pilot study is nearly essential.
Data Collection
Outline the general plan for collecting the data. This may include survey administration procedures,
interview or observation procedures. Include an explicit statement covering the field controls to be
employed. Detailed data collection procedures should also be included so that other researchers can
replicate your method exactly if required.
Data Analysis
Specify and describe in detail the procedures and techniques of quantitative and qualitative data analysis
you will use (e.g., ANOVA, MANCOVA, etc). Communicate your precise intentions and reasons for
these intentions to the reader. This helps you and the reader evaluate the choices you made and
procedures you followed
Limitations and Delimitations
A limitation identifies potential weaknesses of the study. Think about your analysis, the nature of self-
report, your instruments, the sample. Think about threats to internal validity that may have been
impossible to avoid or minimize explain.
Delimitation addresses how a study will be narrowed in scope, that is, how it is bounded. This is the place
to explain the things that you are not doing and why you have chosen not to do themthe literature you
will not review (and why not), the population you are not studying (and why not), the methodological
procedures you will not use (and why you will not use them). Limit your delimitations to the things that a
reader might reasonably expect you to do but that you, for clearly explained reasons, have decided not to
do.