PIHANS026

PIHANS XXVI
The Records of the Early Hittite Empire

(c. 1450-1380 b.c.)
By
Philo H.J. Houwink ten Cate
Nederlands Instituut voor het Nabije Oosten

Leiden
1970
UITGAVEN VAN HET
NEDERLANDS HISTORISCH-ARCHAEOLOGISCH INSTITUUT TE ISTANBUL
Publications de l'institut historique et archeologique de Stamboul
sous la direction de
A.A. KAMPMAN et MACHTELD MELLINK
XXVI
THE RECORDS OF THE E.ARLY HITTITE EMPIRE

(c. 1450-1380 B.C.)
THE RECORDS
OF THE EARLY HITTITE EMPIRE
(C. 1450-13 80 B.C.)
by
PHILO H.J. HOUWINK TEN CATE
1STANBUL
NEDERLANDS HISTORISCH-ARCHA.EOLOGISCH INSTITUUT
IN HET NABIJE OOSTEN
1970
Copyright 1970 by
Nederlands Instituut voor het Nabije Oosten
Leiden
AU rights reserved, including the right to translate or

to reproduce this book or parts thereof in any form
Printed in Belgium
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Preface . IX
Concise Bibliography and List of .Abbreviations . XII
Introduction 1
I. Linguistical Evidence 7
II. The Linguistical Interpretation of Textual Variants 29
III. Philological Evidence 38
IV. Historical Considerations 57
.Appendix .A List of Catalogue Numbers for the Middle Hittite Texts. 80

Indices 84
Map .Asia Minor in the beginning of the Empire period
PREFACE
This study is a first result of the Computer Project as undertaken by Professor

Giiterbock at the Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago. The goal of
this project was the preparation of a concordance for lexicographical research
on parts of the corpus of Hittite texts. First an intricate and rather elaborate
system of adaptation was worked out in order to enable the computer to handle
Hittite texts, even though these may be entered only with the help of the limited
number of characters available on the keyboard of an IBM card punch. In this
system all the necessary <<diplomatic>> details (break signs, text restorations
either free or based upon a duplicate, textual variants) are preserved. The text
is processed in a three-line system (Discon) which has been developed at the
Computer Center of the University of California for use on an IBM 7090. The
A-line presents the text itself in natural text-units (discourse blocks), these being
the paragraphs established by the Hittite scribes themselves. As stated above,
this A-line contains all the necessary "diplomatic" information.
The B-line of the multi-line text has been used to add the stems by which the
print-out of the A-line should be arranged (in other words the lexical concordance
is actually made on the B-line). Personal names, place names and the names of
deities bear a special mark and are consequently assembled in special parts of
the concordance. Wherever possible Hittite values have been added to Sumero-
grams and Akkadograms; homonyms have been distinguished; enclitics have
received a separate entry.
Grammatical and syntactical classifications have been coded and stored in the
C-line. This means that the output also contains a grammatical and a syntactical
concordance. A special "Search Program" was developed by our programmer,
Mr. Robert Ekstrom, in order to assemble such spelling items as double consonants,
plene writing of vowels, all possible vowel sequences within a word, and also
to draw up a tabulation for the use of the syllabary during the different periods
in which Hittite texts were written.
Up to the present, the Old Hittite texts (1965-1966) and those of the Middle
Hittite period (1967-1968) have been prepared for computer processing. For
two reasons it was decided to study the Middle Hittite output first, primarily
because it is relatively small and limited to a short span of time (approximately
1450-1380 B. C.), and secondly because of the historical importance of the problems
X PREFACE
involved. This first study is rather limited in scope and offers a good test-case
for the feasibility of computer analysis in the dating of<< floating)} texts. I have
the impression that the method offers good prospects on this point and that it
could lead to a considerable enlargement in the number of recognized Middle
Hittite texts.
Perhaps I may add a note of warning. All I have attempted to do is to make a

first beginning with a cautious reappraisal of the situation after the pioneer
studies of Kammenhuber, Carruba, Gurney ana Otten. Taking my clue from the
historical texts I have used a combination of strictly grammatical and philological
evidence together with prosopographical and geographical indications in order
to form a limited, reliable corpus of Middle Hittite texts. But I have no doubt
that this choice represents no more than a modest beginning. After the criteria
to date cuneiform texts and manuscripts have been more fully developed, many
more compositions will be attributed to the beginning of the Empire period
on strictly grammatical and philological grounds alone.
The philological preparation and the transcription for computer input of all the
Old Hittite texts were performed by Professor Giiterbock. I added the B- and
C-lines and performed or supervised the key-punching. Under supervision of
Professor Giiterbock, A-, B-and C-lines of the Middle Hittite texts were performed
by me. I also took care of the key-punching. Mr. Robert Ekstrom adapted the
Discon program for use at the Chicago Computation Center and made our own
"Search Program". He supervised the actual processing of all our material.
The work was undertaken with the help of grants from the University of Chicago
and the American Council of Learned Societies, both of which are gratefully
acknowledged here. Both Professors Giiterbock and Laroche as well as Folke
Josephson and Dr.I.S. Herschberg have been so kind as to read an earlier draft
of this study. I have greatly profited by their comments and criticisms. The
responsibility for the alternative hypothesis with respect to the distribution of
the Hittite historical texts as presented in this expose rests only with me, however.
Their willingness to discuss certain details and implications of either the Hittito-
logical side of this study (Giiterbock, Laroche and J osephson) or its more general
methodological aspects (Herschberg) should not be taken to imply unqualified
approval.
I owe a special debt of gratitude to both professors Giiterbock and Laroche and
Mr.D.A. Kennedy. Professor Giiterbock invested a lifetime's work in the Old
Hittite texts and the "proof" as given in Chapter I is completely dependent
upon the grammatical analysis of the corpus of Old Hittite texts as prepared
PREFACE XI
by him for the Hittite Computer Analysis Project. Professor Laroche entrusted
me with the final editing of the file card system by him and Mr.D.A. Kennedy
in connection with their work for the Projet de Repertoire Geographique. The
historical Chapter IV could not have been written without the support of their
painstaking work. To Mrs. A.M. de Bruin-Cousins M.A. I offer my sincere thanks
for the time and care so promptly given to the final revision of the English text.
Amsterdam, Mei 1969 Philo H.J. HouwiNK TEN CATE

CONCISE BIBLIOGRAPHY AND LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
In general I have adhered to the systems used by either Friedrich (Hethitisches

W orterbuch, Heidelberg, 1952; Erganzungsh., 1957, 1961, 1966) or Laroche
(Catalogue des Textes Hittites, see below).
AAA Annals of Archaeology and Anthropology, Liver-

pool.
AfO Archiv fur Orientforschung, Berlin.
Alp, S., Instructions Military Instructions of the Hittite King Tut-
haliya IV ( ?), Belleten XI (1947), fasc. 43,
p. 383 ff.
Anat. Studies Anatolian Studies, Journal of the British
Institute of Archaeology at Ankara, London.
Anatolica Annuaire international pour les Civilisations
de l' Asie Anterieure, Leiden.
ANET1 Ancient Near Eastern Texts relating to the Old
Testament, edited by J.B. Pritchard, Princeton,
1950.
Arch Or Archiv Orientalni, Praha.
Baghd.Mitt. Baghdader Mitteilungen, Deutsches Archaolo-
gisches Institut, Abteilung Baghdad, Berlin.
Bossert, H. Th., Asia, Istanbul, 1946.
CAH The Cambridge Ancient History : fasc. 40,
H. Lewy, Anatolia in the Old Assyrian Period,
fasc. 44, O.R. Gurney, Anatolia c.1600-1380 B.O.
Carruba et alii. Bemerkungen = Carruba, 0., Soucek, V., Sternemann, R.,
Kleine Bemerkungen zur jiingsten Fassung der
hethitischen Gesetze, ArchOr XXXIII (1965),
pp. 1-18.
Carruba, 0., Wisurijanza Das Beschworungsritual fiir die Gottin W isu-
rijanza, SBT no 2, Wiesbaden, 1966.
-, Verbalendungen Die V erbalendungen auf -wani und -tani und
das relative Alter der heth. Texte, Die Sprache
XII (1966), p. 79 ff.
-, Die I. und II. Pers. plur. Die I. und II. Pers. plur. im Luwischen und
Lykischen, Die Sprache XIV (1968), p. 13 ff.
BIBLIOGRAPHY AND LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS xm
Cornelius, Fr., Geographie Geographie des Hethiterreiches, Orientalia XXVII

(1958), pp. 225-251 and 373-397.
Forrer, E., Forschungen I, II, Erkner bei Berlin, 1926.
Kilikien zur Zeit des Hatti-Reiches, Mit 2
Karten, Klio XXX (1937), pp. 135-186.
Friedrich, J., Staatsv. I-II Staatsvertriige des Hatti-Reiches in hethitischer
Sprache I-II, MVAeG 31.2 and 34.1, Leipzig,
1926 and 1930.
Garelli, P., Assyriens Les Assyriens en Cappadoce, Bibliotheque ar-
cheologique et historique de l'Institut Fran9ais
d' Archeologie d'Istanbul XIX, Paris, 1963.
Garstang-Gurney, Geography = Garstang, J., and Gurney, O.R., The Geography
of the Hittite Empire, Occasional Publications
of the British Institute of Archaeology m
Ankara, n 5, London, 1959.
Goetze, A., Madduwattas MYAeG 32.1, Leipzig, 1928.
-,AM Die Annalen des Mursilis, MVAeG 38, Leipzig,
1933.
-, Kizzuwatna - K izzuwatna and the Problem of H ittite Geography
(Yale Oriental Series, Researches XXII), New
Haven, 1940.
-, Kleinasien2 Kleinasien 2 , Handbuch der Altertumswissen-
schaft etc., Miinchen, 1957.
Giiterbock, H. G., SBo I-II - Siegel aus Bo!Jazkoy I-II, MO Beiheft 5 and
6, Berlin, 1940, 1942.
- , << Deeds )} - The Deeds of Suppliuliuma as Told by His Son,
Mursili II, JCS X (1956), pp. 41-68. 75-98,
107-130.
Gurney, O.R., Hittite Prayers of Mursili II, AAA XXVII
(1940), pp. 3-163.
Mita of Pahhuwa, AAA XXVIII (1948), pp. 32-
47.
Hahn, A., The Shift of a H ittite Conjunction from the
Temporal to the Conditional Sphere, Language
XX (1944), pp. 91-107.
IF Indogermanische Forschungen, Zeitschrift fiir
Indogermanistik und allgemeine Sprachwissen-
schaft, Berlin.
Istanb. Mitt. Istanbuler Mitteilungen, Tiibingen.
JAOS - Journal of the American Oriental Society,
New Haven, Con., USA.
XIV BIBLIOGRAPHY AND LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
JCS Journal of Cuneiform Studies, New Haven,

Conn., USA.
JNES - Journal of Near Eastern Studies, Chicago.
Kammenhuber, A., Die hethitischen V orstellungen von Seele und
Leib, Herz und Leibesinnerem, l{opf und Person,
ZA LVI N.F. 22 (1964), pp. 150-212; ZA LVII
N.F. 23 (1965), pp. 177-222.
-, Sprachen l{leinasiens Die Sprachen des vorhellenistischen Kleinasien
in ihrer Bedeutung fur die heutige I ndogerma-
nistik, MSS XXIV (1968), pp. 55-123.
-, Arier Die Arier im Vorderen Orient, Heidelberg, 1968.
-, Altkleinasiatische Altkleinasiatische Sprachen, Handbuch der
Sprachen Orientalistik, Erster Abteilung, Zweiter Ab-
schnitt, Lieferung 2, LeidenJKoln, 1969.
KIF - Kleinasaiatische Forschungen, Weimar, Band
I 1-3, 1927-1930.
Kii.mmel, H., Ersatzrituale - Ersatzrituale fur den hethitischen Konig, SBT
no 3, Wiesbaden, 1967.
Laroche, E., Cat(alogue) - Catalogue des Textes Hittites, RHA fasc. 58
(pp. 33-38), 59 (pp. 69-116), 60 (pp. 30-89),
62 (pp. 18-64), Paris, 1956-1958.
DLL Dictionnaire de la Langue Louvite, Bibliotheque
archeologique et historique de l'Institut Fran-
yais d' Archeologie d'Istanbul VI, Paris, 1959.
La Priere Hittite : Vocabulaire et Typologie,
Ecole pratique des Hautes Etudes, ye Section,
Sciences Religieuses; Annuaire, tome LXXII
(1964/65), pp. 3-29.
-, Mythologie anatolienne Textes mythologiques hittites en transcription,
Prem. Partie Mythologie anatolienne, RHA fasc.
77 (1965).
-,Noms des Hittites Les Noms des Hittites, Paris, 1966.
MAOG Mitteilungen der altorientalischen Gesellschaft,
Leipzig.
MDOG Mitteilungen der Deutschen Orient-Gesellschaft
in Berlin.
Meriggi, P., Fragmente Uber einige hethitische Fragmente historischen
lnhaltes, WZKM LVIII (1962), pp. 66-110.
MIO Mitteilungen des Instituts fiir Orientforschung,
Berlin.
BIBLIOGRAPHY AND LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS XV
MSS - Miinchener Studien zur Sprachwissenschaft,

Miinchen.
MVAeG Mitteilungen der Vorderasiatisch-Aegyptischen
Gesellschaft, Leipzig.
Neu, E., Interpretation Interpretation der hethitischen rnediopassiven V er-
balformen, SBT n 5, Wiesbaden, 1968.
-, Grundlagen - Das hethitische Mediopassiv und seine indoger-
manische Grundlagen, SBT n 6, Wiesbaden,
1968.
OLZ Orientalistische Literaturzeitung, Berlin/Leipzig.
Orientalia Orientalia Nova Series, Pontificium Institutum
Biblicum, Roma.
Otten, H., LTU Luvische Texte in Umschrijt, Berlin, 1953.
-,Tot. Hethitische Totenrituale, Berlin, 1958.
-, Quellen - Die hethitischen historischen Quellen und die
altorientalische Chronologie, Abh. d. Geistes- und
Sozialwiss. Kl. Jhrg. 1968. 3, Akad. d. Wiss.
u.d. Lit. in Mainz, Wiesbaden.
R.A Revue d' Assyriologie et d' Archeologie Orientale,
Paris.
RHA Revue Hittite et Asianique, Paris.
RL.A Reallexikon der .Assyriologie, Berlin/Leipzig.
SBT Studien zu den Bogazkoy-Texten, Wiesbaden.
von Schuler, E., Wurden- Die Wurdentragereide des .Arnuwanda, Orien-
tragereide talia XXV (1956), pp. 209-240.
-, H ethitische Dienst- H ethitische Dienstanweisungen fur hohere H of-
anweisungen und Staatsbeamte, MO Beiheft 10, Berlin, 1957.
-, H ethitische H ethitische K onigserlasse als Quellen der Rechts-
K onigserlasse jindung ... , Festschrift J. Friedrich, Heidelberg,
1959, pp. 435-472.
- , Sonderforrnen Sonderformen hethitischer Staatsvertrage, Gedenk-
schrift Bossert, Anadolu Ara~malari Hel-
muth Theodor Bossert' in Hatirasina Armagan
Oilt II - Sayi 1-2, Istanbul, 1965, pp. 445-464.
- , Staatsvertrage und Staatsvertrage und Dokumente hethitischen Rechts
Dokurnente in G. Walser, Neuere Hethiterforschung, His-
toria Einzelschriften Heft 7, Wiesbaden, 1964,
pp. 34-53.
-,Die Kaskaer Die Kaskaer. Ein Beitrag zur Ethnographie
des alten Kleinasien, ... , Berlin, 1965.
XVI BIBLIOGRAPHY AND LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
Sommer, F., AU - Die A!J!JiJava-Urkunden, Abh. d. Bayr. Aka-

demie d. Wiss., Phil.-Hist. Abt., N.F. 6, Miin-
chen, 1934.
-, HAB Sommer, F., and Falkenstein, A., Die hethitisch-
akkadische Bilingue des Hattusili I (Labarna II),
Abh. d. Bayr. Akademie d. Wiss., Phil-Hist.
Abt., N.F. 16, Miinchen, 1938.
Sternemann, R., Temporale und konditionale Nebensiitze des
Hethitischen, MIO IX (1966), pp. 231 and 377 ff.
Weidner, E.F., PD - Politische Dokumente aus Kleinasien, ... , Bogh.-
Stud. 8-9, Leipzig, 1923.
WZKM Wiener Zeitschrift fiir die Kunde des Morgen-
landes, Wien.
ZA Zeitschrift fiir Assyriologie und Vorderasiatische
Archaologie, Berlin.
INTRODUCTION
During the last decades there has been a growing tendency among Hittitologists
to question the traditional order of the Hittite historical texts : a number of
compositions mainly connected with the names of Tudhaliyas and Arnuwandas
have been re-assigned from the last decennia of the Empire to an earlier period
between Tudhaliyas II (in actual fact the first king of this name) and Suppiluliu-
mas I. This period represents the early beginning of the Hittite Empire (c. 1450-
1380 B.O.), while from a linguistic point of view the texts have aptly been charac-
terized as <<Middle Hittite >>.
The first texts to be thus redated were Cat. 155 (land grant decree of Arnuwandas,
Asmunikal and the tuhukantis Tudhaliyas}, Cat. 175 (treaty with the dignitaries
of certain northern districts concluded by the same group of royal persons),
Cat. 277 (prayer of Arnuwandas and Asmunikal about the disruption of the cults
in those northern districts which were ravaged by the Gasgaeans), Cat. 354.1
(Asmunikal on the establishment of a mausoleum) 1 For Cat. 155, this new attri-
bution was supported by a strong archaeological argument. After this first
discovery by Giiterbock, Goetze adduced historical reasons to prove that Cat. 87
(treaty with nobles from Ismerikka) should be dated to the same general period 2
Perhaps it is useful to retrace the course of the discussion. Giiterbock had trans-
ferred the first group of texts to a king Arnuwandas who was supposed to have
lived sometime before Suppiluliumas. Goetze ascribed them to a still earlier
king of this name. This attribution seemed to be proven correct when Laroche
tried to eliminate the other Arnuwandas before Suppiluliumas altogether 3
Very recently the picture changed again, for now Otten wants to eliminate Hattu-
silis II and Tudhali yas Ill (= II 1), with the surprising result that again we are
faced by an Arnuwandas just before Suppiluliumas I : 4
traditional order: Tudhaliyas II (= 11) Otten: Tudhaliyas II (=11)
Arnuwandasl Arnuwandasl
Hattusilis II Suppiluliumas I.
Tudhaliyas Ill(= Ill)
Suppiluliumas I ;
1 Cf. Guterbock, MDOG 74 (1936), p. 68 ff. and SBo I, p. 32 ff.
2 Cf. Goetze, Kizzuwatna, p. 76 ff., JAOS LXXIT (1952), p. 70 and JCS XI (1957), p. 57 ff.
3 See Laroche, RA XLVII (1953), p. 70 ff, and especially p. 77.
4 Cf. Otten, Quellen, Tabelle I on p. 25.
2 THE RECORDS OF THE EARLY HITTITE EMPIRE
Already a few years ago, Otten and Carruba voiced doubts about the dating
of the Gasgaean treaties by von Schuler in his edition, Die Kaskaer (1965), to the
period of Arnuwandas III 5 In the meantime Carruba gave his arguments in
two important articles on the verbal endings -wani and -tani 6 On historical
grounds Gordon and Gurney concluded that Cat. 85 and 86 - annals of a king
Tudhaliyas (n 85) and his son Arnuwandas (n 86) which are clearly interrelated-
should not be attributed to the last kings who bore these names but to their
predecessors at the beginning of the Empire period 7 In his last treatment of
Hittite history Otten pointed to the archaic characteristics of Cat. 89 (the in-
dictment of Madduwattas) in matters of grammar and spelling 8 In his books
on the Hittite Medio-passive and also in his review of von Schuler's book, Die
Kaskaer, Neu gave important comments on the chronology of Hittite texts in
general and also on the date of various specific texts 9
So far scholars have limited themselves to the study of the attribution of specific
texts. The general problem of attribution has not yet been formulated so as to
encompass all the texts concerned, nor have the systematics of such attributions
been studied. While preparing the datable Hittite texts for the computer project
as engaged upon by Professor Giiterbock, I had occasion to deal first with all
the known Old Hittite material and afterwards with the undoubtedly Middle
Hittite texts. It then struck me that analysis for and by the computer led to
the establishment of a certain number of typical Middle Hittite traits which
are also to be found in the texts of disputed attribution. Personally I would
advance that a fairly large group of texts has indeed been wrongly dated and
that the traditional view of Hittite history proceeds from assumptions on the
temporal sequence of the Hittite historical texts which are at least open to discus-
sion. It could be of importance to describe an alternative attribution in some
detail and to evaluate the consequences of the proposed change.
It is impossible, I think, just to redate one or very few texts. It seems probable
that a scholar like von Schuler, who worked on a number of the disputed group 10,
5 Cf. von Schuler, Die Ka8kaer, p. 113 note 13.

6 See Carruba, Verbalendungen (Die Sprache XII (1966), p. 79 ff.) and Die I. und 11. Pers. Plur.
(Die Sprache XIV (1968), p. 13 ff.).
7 Cf. Gurney, GAH fasc. 44, p. 15 ff.
8 See Otten, Die altorientalische Reiche 11 (Fischer Weltgeschichte), p. 169.
9 See Neu, Interpretation und Grundlagen, passim; review on von Schuler, Die Kas1ciier, in IF LXXIII
(1968), p. 169 ff.

1 Cat. 176 in his Hethitische Dienstanwei.mngen, Cat. 172 and 178.1 in his article Hethitische Konigs
erlasse, and Cat. 95-97 in his book Die Kas1ciier.
INTRODUCTION 3
must have felt that they clearly belong together. This very proper feeling probably
contributed to his conservative attitude.
In order to explain a number of archaic traits, e.g. in the indictment of Maddu-

wattas (Oat. 89), it has been supposed that the last generation of scribes was
subject to archaizing tendencies 11 It is of course hard to refute this theory and
to prove that the texts in question are not be regarded as late originals with
archaizing tendencies, but rather as compositions of an earlier period, being either
originals themselves, or, in part alleast, late copies which were adapted to some
degree to later scribal habits. In all fairness it should be clearly stated that the
alternative hypothesis is based on two assumptions, both of which require proof,
1) that the Hittite language knew a gradual development from the period of the
Old Hittite kingdom up to the last texts dating from the period just before the
destruction of the Hittite capital, and 2) that Hittite scribes often adapted their
copies to the more modern usage of their own days. I shall try to deal with these
points in two different chapters of this study.
.After an enumeration of all the texts concerned I shall concentrate on the lin-
guistical evidence that these texts indeed constitute a category of their own
falling between the Old Hittite texts and the texts of the period of Suppiluliumas I.
This material is arranged in such a manner that it may also serve to give proof
of the first assumption just formulated, that of the gradual development of the
Hittite language (Chapter I). Hittite compositions which happen to be preserved
in several copies sometimes show differences in their wording, i.e. textual variants,
which are of a linguistical nature. It can thus be shown that these texts are preser-
ved in an older and a younger version, an original and a later redaction. This
proves that some texts were modernized to a considerable degree (Chapter II).
In a number of cases there is strong evidence that such double versions also
exist for a member of the disputed group. In other examples where only one
manuscript exists, there are formal or internal indications that the tablet is not
an original, but a later copy. For a third group of disputed texts the variation
between "free" spelling variants seems to designate that they either stem from
an intermediary period between older and newer spelling habits, or should be
considered as partially adapted copies of later times. All this will be given in a
chapter under the title Philological Evidence (Chapter III). Historical arguments
for this alternative attribution and some of its consequences will be put forward
in a fourth Chapter (Historical Considerations). Appendix A enumerates all those
11 Cf. Goetze, Madduwattas, p. 137 and most clearly Crossland, Compte Rendu de la troisieme Ren-
contre Assyriologique internationale, Leiden, 1954, p. 158 ff.
compositions which in my opinion should be considered as Middle Hittite (in

the order used in Laroche's Catalogue des Textes Hittites).
Enumeration of Texts 12
A. Old Hittite texts (corpus constituted by Professor Giiterbock).
B. Undoubtedly Middle Hittite texts. This group consists of the following compo-
sitions:
KBo XV 10 (ritual mentioning Tudhaliyas II and Nikalmati).
KBo XVI 31 (cf. Otten in the Introduction to that volume: " ... , kleine Schrift,
ahnlich Nr. 25"; fragment of an instruction or treaty).
KBo XVI 45 (cf. Otten in the Introduction : "Die Schrift ahnelt stark dem sog.
alten Duktus" ; fragment of an instruction or treaty).
KBo XVI 46 (cf. Otten in the Introduction: " ... , kleine Schrift, sonst Ahnlich-
keit mit alterem Duktus" ; fragment of an instruction or treaty).
KBo XVI 47 (treaty of the 15th century, cf. Otten in the Introduction to KBo
XVI and Istanb. Mitt. XVII (1967), p. 55 ff.) 1 3.
Cat. 155 (land grant decree of Arnuwandas, Asmunikal and the tuhukantis Tud-
haliyas).
Cat. 175 (treaty with the dignitaries of certain northern districts concluded by
Arnuwandas, Asmunikal and the tuhukantis Tudhaliyas).
Cat. 178.10 (XXXI 103; this remarkable text - more probably a treaty than
an instruction - has the external characteristics of a sealed land grant decree ;
Professor Giiterbock communicated to me that the tablet clearly shows the
Middle Hittite type of writing - see below Chapter III) 14
Cat. 179 ("Protocole de succession dynastique" ; see for the importance of this
text Miss Kammenhuber, ZA LVII N.F. 23 (1965), p. 179 note 13; one of the
12 Bibliographical references are given in Appendix A.

13 Huhazalmas (Obv. : 2, 4 and 26) is already known from Cat. 155 (KBo V 7) Obv.: 6, INA MU.
l.KAM M:e:uulJa-za-al-ma, and also from the newly published XL 110.
14 See also the reference to Hurri land in line 18 - to be compared with the text restoration KUR
:e:[urri] in Cat. 88 (XXIII 72) Rev. : 36, cf. So=er, AU, p. 47. This text and Cat. 88 have more in
common. The left rim of XXXI 103 may be restored as follows :
1 na-as-ta ma-a-an LU.MES URUPa-a[]J-l;}u-wa NI-IS DINGIR-LIMJ
2 [sa] r-ra-an-zi nu IT-TI DUTU-SI [ .......................................]
3 nu nuTU-SI IS-TU NI-IS DINGIR-LJM par [-ku-is ...............]
4 fJ A-NA LU.MES URUMa-al-ti[-ia .......................................]
5 QA-DU EREM.MES-SU-NU U [ ..........................................]
6 pa-an-kur-se[-et .......................................... ]
Maltiya (Malatya) is mentioned as URuMa-al-di-ia is the list of L U.MES SU.GI of Cat. 88 (XXIII
72) Rev. : 37; Mita of Pahhuwa is well-known from that text.
INTRODUCTION 5
pieces assembled under this number - Cat. 179.6 -has been recognized as part
of the Gasgaean treaty KBo XVI 27 and is given in translitteration by von Schuler,
Die Kaskaer, p. 134 ff. together with the rest of that tablet. Cat. 179.9 is now
available as KBo XVI 24 (+) 25.
Cat. 180.2 (XXXVI 119, cf. Otten, MDOG 83 (1951), p. 55 note 7; two texts
may be added on account of the personal name SALLalantiwashas occurring
in both, XXXIV 58 - cf. Otten, I.e. and also Meriggi, Fragmente, p. 97 - and
203/f- a few lines have been quoted by Neu, Interpretation, p. 33) 15
Cat. 275 (prayer of Kantuzzilis).
Cat. 276 (royal prayer to the Sun-god mentioning Arzawa; for the importance
of this text, see Carruba, W isurijanza: p. 32).
Cat. 277 (prayer of Arnuwandas and Asmunikal) and the related KBo XII 132 16
Cat. 283 C (this prayer possesses a replica in more modern spelling; the old version
refers to Kizzuwatna as a separate state; for the importance of this text, see
Carruba, Wisurijanza, p. 46).
Cat. 354.1 (Asmunikal on the establishment of a mausoleum).
C. Possibly Middle Hittite texts. This group consists of the following compositions :
KBo XVI 50 (a pledge of allegiance).
Cat. 85 (annals of Tudhaliyas II, cf. Gordon and Gurney as quoted above).
Cat. 86 (annals of Arnuwandas I; this composition refers to the same Assuwa
campaign as Cat. 85 in the additional fragment XXIII 14).
Cat. 87 (treaty with nobles from Ismerikka, cf. Goetze as quoted above; see
also Carruba, V erbalendungen, p. 89).
Cat. 88 (Mita of Pahhuwa; cf. Carruba, Wisurijanza, p. 32 and Verbalendungen,
p. 89; the newly published piece XL 10 joins to XXIII 72 Rev. : 36-39 and confirms
Forrer's text restoration for line 37, [URUPit-te-ia-r] i-ga, see beJow, p. 62 note 31).
Cat. 89 (indictment of Madduwattas, cf. Otten as quoted above).
Cat. 94 (treaty with Sunassuras (I~), cf. Meyer, MIO I (1953), p. 121 ff. and Goetze,
JCS XI (1957), pp. 71 and 72) 17.
15 The fragments of Cat. 179.1-5, 7-8, 179.9 and those mentioned here refer to events in the period
before Suppiluliumas I. The sons ofKantuzzilis and Himmuilis were admonished to protect a designated
successor to the throne, cf. XXXVI 114 II: 12 ff. (179.5) as restored by Sommer-Otten, OLZ XLVIII
(1953), c. 15 note 2 : (12) su-me-e-sa DUMU.MES [Mlfi-m]u-i-li DUMU.MFS MKa[n-tu-zi-li] (13) su-
me-sa a-pu-u-un pa-al:J.-]Ja-as-du-ma-a[t]. In XXXVI 119 (180 2) the name Tudhaliyas is written in
lines 3, 4 and 7 and line 5 reads as follows : (5) [ ......... n]a-an-kan LUGAL-u-iz-ni is-k[i-i]r, "and
they anointed him for kingship" (cf. Kiimmel, Ersatzrituale, p. 43).
16 C Laroche, OLZ LIX (1964), c. 565, but Cat. 283 C/A should also be adduced.
17 VIII 81 (Cat. 36.2 B) closely resembles XXXVI 127 (Cat. 94) and Meyer's suggestion that both
fragments belong together certainly is attractive (MIO I (1953), pp. 121-123). Meyer thinks that both
could stem from an early treaty of a Hittite king with an hypothetical Sunassuras I of Kizzuwatna,
who was contemporary with Saussatar of Mitanni. But Meyer continues : "Die andere Moglichkeit
Cat. 95-97 (Gasgaean treaties, cf. Otten, Carruba and Neu as quoted above).
Cat. 99 (treaty of Arnuwandas ( ~) with the city of Ura; a similar place name
not necessarily referring to the same town is mentioned in KBo XVI 47).
n
Cat. 124.6 (letter ( about Kurustama; in my opinion it is possible to use XL
28 as a duplicate to KBo VIII 37 : KBo VIII 37 : I = XL 28 : 4-5; KBo VIII
37 : 2 = XL 28 : 6) 18.
Cat. 170 (military instructions of a king Tudhaliyas) 19
Cat. 171.3 (archaic version of Cat. 170 rightly reckoned to that composition
by Alp, Instructions, p. 383 ff.; cf. Carruba, Wisurijanza, p. 32).
Cat. 172 (a law-text of Tudhaliyas II mentioning the Assuwa campaign, cf. Otten,
Quellen, p. 19 note 4).
Cat. 17 4 (instructions for the Mayor of Hattusas).
Cat. 176 (instructions for the Commander of the Border Guards, cf. Carruba,
Wisurijanza, p. 32 on the strength of ma-a-alJ_-lJ_a-an in XIII 1= M).
Cat. 178.1 (law-text of a king Tudhaliyas).
N.B. In Chapter III on the philological evidence, I hope to show that Cat. 171.3
should be considered as an archaic version of Cat. 170. The same applies to a
group of manuscripts for Cat. 176 as compared to the main version of that com-
position. This is the reason why I decided, in Chapter I (Linguistical Evidence),
to use not all but only part of the manuscripts for both compositions. In the case
of Cat. 174 I can find no grounds for differentiating between the various manu-
scripts. In its original form the composition should certainly go back to Arnu-
wandas I, however 20 With respect to Cat. 178. 3 and 4, both of which edicts
issued by a king Arnuwandas, I feel more uncertain. In Chapter I, cat. 17 4 will
be used rather sparingly. Cat. 178.3 and 4 have been disregarded altogether.
D. Texts from the time of Suppiluliumas I : Cat. 32 d - Cat. 40, Cat. 171 (2 and
3 being excluded).
ist jedoch nicht auszuschliessen, dass iu beiden hethitischen Fragmenten eine friihere Fassung des
bekannten akkadischen Suppiluliuma-Sunassura-Vertrages vorliegt - eines friiheren, weil noch
keiner der beiden Vertragspartner feste militarisch-politische Verbindungen einzugehen verpflichtet
ist". Linguistic indications and philological arguments which will be duly mentioned in the following
Chapters point to the first solution. Goetze preferred Meyer's first alternative, cf. JCS XI (1957),
p. 7l note 191 and p. 72 XXXVI 127 is slightly more elaborate than VIII SI, as far as both pieces
coincide. It seems a distinct possibility that VIII SI either is or reflects an early draft, while XXXVI
127 represents an ameliorated and perhaps final version. See, too, p. 44 note 16 and p. 60 note 20.
18 In his Introduction to this KUB-volume Klengel rightly compares both texts.
19 Cf. the appraisal by D.J. Lee, ArchOr XXXIV (1966), pp. 17-IS together with note 20.
2 Cf. Otten, Baghd. Mitt. III (1964), p. 92 : "Jedoch wird man nach Indizien die Abfassung der
Instruktion in alterer Zeit erwagen diirfen, auch wenn in der Vielzahl der Textexemplare das Ergebnis
jiingerer Abschriften vorliegt".
I. LINGUISTICAL EVIDENCE
If the texts of group C - the disputed group - are really to be classified as

JYiiddle Hittite, they should show the same characteristics as the texts of group B,
and both B and C should occupy a middle position between A and D. The gram-
matical correspondencies given below are of greater importance than the simi-
larities in spelling, some of which have also been noted, because there is indeed,
as has been repeatedly stated by Miss A. Kammenhuber, a change in spelling
habits between the older periods (Old and Middle Hittite) and the Late Hittite
Empire 1 . Though aware of the limited value of these data from spelling, I small
nevertheless adduce them, since they may serve to connect groups B and C, one
before the change in spelling habits referred to above and the other after it, if
the customary dating of group C would be correct.
Unfortunately not all these items from spelling may profitably be enumerated
under this heading. There is a special group of "free" spelling variants, linguis-
tically totally indifferent but at the same time very significant from the philo-
logical point of view: a-ap-pa versus EGIR-pa, a-ap-pa-an as compared to EGIR
(-pa)-an, ma-a-a]J_-J;j_a-anfma-a]J_-J;j_a-an against GIM-an, na-at-ta versus 0-UL.
These variations will be discussed later on, at the end of Chapter III. Here I
shall limit the comparison to spelling items which seem to be of linguistical value
(vowel changes; plene writing as a possible means to denote stress).
I am not yet completely convinced by the Luwian explanation of the -wanif-uni
1 A. Ka=enhuber, ZA LVII N.F. 23 (1965), p. 179 note 13 and Altkleinasiatische Sprachen, p. 174 ff.
At this point I warn the reader for the differences between my presentation and the opinion of Pro-
fessor Ka=enhuber. Miss Kammenhuber who was the first to apply a very similar approach to the
texts of this period still adheres to the traditional order of the Hittite historical texts, witness her
recent publications, Altkleina.siatische Sprachen, pp. 131-132, 148; Arier, pp. 31-32, 37-38, 41-42,
p. 45 note 13, p. 101 note 3ll; Sprachen Kleinasiens, note 23 on pp. ll6-ll7. She uses moreover a
slightly different terminology : << Althethitisch", "Junghethitisch" and within the latter as an initial
phase "archaisch-junghethitisch" and a final stage "spates Junghethitisch". According to her the
latter is characterized by more or less strong signs of linguistic deterioration in addition to deliberate
archaisms ("mehr oder minder starke sprachliche Verfallserscheinungen neben bewussten Archaisie-
rungen"), cf. Altkleinasiatische Sprachen, p. 132. She rightly stresses - and was, I believe, the first
to realize the importance of this phenomenon - that her "archaisch-junghethitisch" still follows
the spelling habits of Old Hittite. In this study I have adhered to the term "Mittelliethitisch" as coined
in the Marburg School. Perhaps the question of the terminology can best be settled after a decision
has been reached on the chronological order of the Hittite texts in general.
and -tani endings as defended by Carruba 2 So far the Hittite evidence for these
endings is much more impressive than the Luwian material. Furthermore, if
they are Luwian, why then do they cluster around the Middle Hittite texts and
why are they absent in tablets from the latest period, when the Luwian influence
cannot have been less strong 3 ~ For the moment we should take them, I think,
at their face value : 1) they never occur alone, but are always accompanied by
their "normal" variants; 2) sometimes they can be found in what seem to be
technical terms or solemn expressions; 3) they are represented in Old Hittite
and in texts from the period of Suppiluliumas, but they are most common in the
Middle Hittite texts, cf. Diagrams 1-3. This last point was first made by Otten,
OLZ LVIII (1963), c. 252 together with note 3; see now H. Otten and V. Soucek,
Ein althethitisohes Ritual fur das Konigspaar (SBT n 3, Wiesbaden, 1969), pp. 77-79.
Diagram 1
"Old Script" -wanij-unij-mani -wenij-meni -tani -teni

Cat. 122.6 1 1
Cat. 289 1 3
Cat. 324 9 21
Diagram 2
Group B -wanif-uni/-mani -wenij-meni -tani -teni

KBo XV 10 3 1
Cat. 175 B 5 7
Cat. 179.9 1 1
Cat. 277 10 7
Cat. 283 C 1 0
XXXIV 58 3 1
2 0. Carruba, Die Verbalendungen auf -wani ~~nd -tani und das relative Alter der heth. Te:de, Die Sprache
Xll (1966), p. 79 ff. and idem, Die I. und II. Pers. Plur. im IA~wischen und im Lykischem, Die Sprache
XIV (1968), p. 13 ff.
3 The personal names of the l'lliddle Hittite period might show similar variants, cf. MA-li-i]J.-'!J.a-an-
ni-is (Cat. 155) but later MA-li-ilJ-lJ.-in-ni (cf. Laroche, Noms des Hittites, no. 31), [MN]a-ri-ik-ka-i-li-ia
(Cat. 179.6) but MNe-ri-i[q-qa-i-li] (Cat. no. 155, cf. Noms des Hittites, no. 887). With respect to place
names the same variation occurs: northern place names like Sapidduwa ("Deeds" and Mursilis' Annals)
and Tinipiya (in the land of Washaniya, cf. the title deed for Sahurunuwas' descendants, XXVI 43
Obv. : 37 = Cat. 81) are also written Sipidduwa (Cat. 277 = von Schuler, Die Kas'7ciier, p. 156) and
Tanipiya (Cat. 257 = Laroche, Mythologie anatolienne, p. 72).
LINGUISTICAL EVIDENCE 9
Diagram 3
Group 0 -wani /-uni /-mani -wenij-meni -tani -teni

Oat. 88 3 9
Oat. 89 1 0
Oat. 95 2 2 1 43
Oat. 96 (A/B) 1 1 + 1 (B) 1 3
Oat. 124.6 1 2
KBo XVI 50 2 4
In a separate chart I have added a number of internal correspondencies (simi-

larities in content matter and structure as well as a few lexical items) among the
texts of group C. The main value of this evidence lies in the additional proof
it affords for the thesis that the texts enumerated under 0, be they Middle or
Late Hittite, belong together. Some sidelines form connections with texts of
groups B and D respectively.
N.B. With respect to the data of Column D, I want to make one important proviso:
the remarks on the use in tablets later than Suppiluliumas I are necessarily in-
complete, being mainly based on the greater compositions like Mursilis' Annals
and "Deeds", his prayers, the "Apology" of Hattusilis III, prayers of Hattusilis
III and Puduhepas and the treaties as edited by Friedrich in his Staatsvertriige.
With respect to Column A the following numbers require an explanation :

3.2 Oat. 3 bjc
20 Oat. 20 b =XXXI 81
25.4 Oat. 25 e = KBo III 28 = 2 BoTU 10 y
28.12 = KBo XII 14
122.6 KBo IX 73 +XXXVI 106, cf. Otten, ZA LV N.F. 21 (1962), p. 156 ff.
181/ For a listing of all the manuscripts, see Friedrich,
184 Die Hethitischen Gesetze, Leiden, 1959, pp. 2-4. 184. Q (= q) has been
copied again by Giiterbock, cf. JOS XVI (1962), pp. 18-21.
289 KBo VII 28, see now Friedrich, Scritti in onore di Giuseppe Furlani =
Rivista degli Studi Orientali XXXII (1957), p. 217 ff.
Chart
A B
Spelling :
i-is-sa-i 181 A(= is-sa-i 181 B) is-sa-at-ti : 275
is-su-u-e[-ni] : 277
is-sa-ag-gu-un : 275; 276
is-si-is-ta : KBo xv 10
nu-uk-kan : 6; 324 nu-uk-ka[n]: 179.5

ka-a-as-sa ("see, lo") : 175
ki-i-nu-ud-du : 275 (but also

ki-nu-ud-du)
ki-i-sa : 181 A; 181 B; 184 J
ki-i-sa-ri : 5; 6; 324
ki-i-sa[-at] : 25; 181 B
ki-i-sa-ti : 27; 28.5
ki-i-sa-an-ta-ti : 181 A ki-i-sa-an-ta-at: KBo XVI 47
ki-i-sa-ru : 21.2; 538 ki-i-sa-ru : 283 C (ki-sa-ru in 283 A)
ma-a-ag-ga-an : 122.6; 289 ma-a-ag-ga-an : KBo XV 10; KBo
ma-a-ag-ga-an-da: 181 A XVI 47; 275; 276; 277
( = ma-ag-ga-an : 181 B); 324 ma-ag-ga-an : 179.5; XXXIV 58; 275;
276; 277
me-e-ma-ag-:g.i : 324 me-e-ma-i : 178.10
me-e-mi-is-ta : KBo XV 10
me-e-mi-ir: KBo XV 10
me-e-ma-u : 275; 283 C
me-e-mi-is-ki : 324 me-e-mi-is-ki-mi : 275
me-e-mi-is-ki-iz-zi : KBo XV 10
me-e-mi-is-ki-it : KBo XV 10
mi-im-ma-an-zi : 181 A
( = me-im-ma-an-zi : 181 B)
ne-e-a-ri : 27 ni-e-an-za : KBo XV 10
ne-e-an: 24 ni-e-an-ta-an: KBo XV 10
ne-e-pi-is : 324 (also ne-pi-is) [ne]-e-pi-sa-az: 276 B
ne-e-pi-sa-as : 308; 324 [ne]-e-pi-si: 276 B
ne-e-pi-sa : 324
KUR uRupf-i-t[a-as-sa]: 283 C(=
KUR [URUP]i-ta-as-sa in 283 A)
sa-a-ku-wa : 25.4; 28.1; 308; 324
[s]a-a-k[u-wa]-as-sa-ru-us : 184 Q
I
c D
is-sa-at-ti : 89 is-sa-a:Q.-:g_i : 38
(is-sa-at-ten : 170) is-sa-at-ti : 38
is-sa-at-te-ni : 38
in later texts e-es-sa- but
Mursilis 279.4 is-si-is[-ta]
ka-a-as : 88; 95 (but also ka-a-sa)

[ka]-a-as-sa-wa-kan: 172
ki-i-nu-an : 176 M
ki-i-sa : 94
ki-sa-ri : 87
ki-sa-an-ta-a [t] : 33 B
ki-sa-an-ta-ru : 88
ma-a-a:Q.-:Q_a-an : 88; 95; (97.4); ma-a:Q_-:Q.a-an everywhere in so far
171.3; 176 Land M als GIM-an is not preferred
ma-a:Q_-:Q.a-an : 88; 89; (97.1);
(170); 176 A etc.
mi-im-ma-as : 89 But note mi-im-ma-as in 47

ne-e-a-an-zi : 88 (Murs.)
ne-e-a-at : 89
ne-e-an-ta-ti : 86
ne-e~ pi-is : 96 A (= ne-pi-is in B)
ne-e-pi-sa-as : 96 A, but
ne-pi-sa-an in 96 B
KUR uRuPi-i-ta-as-sa : 89
sa-a-ku-it : 88 (but also sa-a-ku-wa : 36.2 B (= 94 and C ?)

IGIJJI.A-BU !) Murs.jHatt.j later treaties :
sa-a-ku-[w]a-at: 88 IGI.]JI.A( -wa)
A B
se-e-er-si-it-wa : 181 A
se-e-er-sa-me-et : 324
there is a tendency for se-e-er-fra-
to occur in frontposition
da-i-u-en: KBo XV 10; KBo XVI 47
da-a-i-u-en : KBo XV 10
da-a-i-ir : KBo XV 10; 283 0
da-a-ir : 12; 14.2; 21.2; 25.4 ( = da-a-ir in 283 A)
da-i-ir : KBo XV 10
da-a-i-e-er : 179.6
da-i-e-er : 179.6
da-a-la-i : 181 A da-a-la-i : KBo XV 10
ta-a-la-i : 184 Q
ta-a-la-ab.-hu-un : 5
da-a-li-is : 5; 26.1
da-a-la : 6 da-a-li-i[r] : KBo XV 10
te-e-kan : 324
Grammar:
1) Nom.jacc. plur. in -es

Nouns :ij.al-ke-e-es : 22.2 LU.MES:g_i-lam-mi-e-es : 354.1
LU.MESpa-a:ij.-:ij.ur-zi-e-es : 9 [s]-it-ta-re-e-es : 277
LU.MEssa-la-as-:g.i-e-es : 21.2 DUMU.MESsu-ul-le-e-es : 179.6
sar-di-e-es : 181 A ta-pa-ri-ia-li-i-e-e[s-8] a : 277
Adj. [ka]-ru-u-i-le-e-es : 11 [a-ra-a:ij.-z] e-ne-e-es: 283 a
ka-ru-u-e-le-e-es : 308 a-ra-u-e-es : 354.1
me-eg-ga-e-es : 21.2 a-as-sa-u-e-es : 283 a
da-as-sa-u-e-es : 3.2; 122.6 i-da-a-la-u-e-es : KBo XV 10
i-wa-ar-wa-al-li-i-e[-es] : 155
pa-al-:ij.a-a-e-es : KBo XV 10
sal-la-e-es : 179.8
su-up-pa-e-es : 277
2) 1. pers. sing. nom. Pers. pron. :
ugajuk: without exception uga: KBo XVI 47; 275; 276; 277
ammuk : XXXIV 58 ( 203 /fn;
0 D
([s]a-a-ku-wa-as-sar)
sa-ku-wa-as-sar : 89
se-e-er : 89 (but also se-er) se-er : more common
se-er : more common
da-i-u-en : 88; 96
da-i-u-e-en : 96 B
da-a-ir : 85; 89; 171.3

da-a-i-e?[-er] : 97.2
da-i-e-er : 96
da-a-la-alJ_-:gi : 171.3
(170 : da-a-la-alJ_-:gi but also
ta-la-alJ_-:gi)
da-a-la-i : 171.3
da-la-alJ_-lJ_u-un : 85
te-e-kan : 96 te-e-kan : 38
ar-talJ_-:gi-e-es : 176 E
a-u-wa-re-e-es : 176 M
lu-us-ta-ni[-i]-e-es : 176 N
(cf. lu-us-ta-ni-e-es in 176 F)
za-ak-ki-i-e-es : 176 N
lJ_a-an-te-ez-zi-i-e[-es] : 176 M
DINGIR.MESJ;(a-pi-re-e[-es] : 95 [DINGIR.MESJ;[a-pi]-re-e-es ; 38
DINGIR.MESLu-u-la-hi-e-es 95
~ 0
ka-ru-u-i-le-e-es : 95 me-eg-gas-e-es : 38
na-ak-ki-i-e-es : 85
uga : 85; 96; 88; 89; 96; 99; (170) ammuk: 33 B; 35 B; 38; 40.1
ammuk: 89 Murs. : ammuk; ukel; ukila
Muw. : uk; ammuk (uga also dat. !)
A B
3) 2. pers. plur. gen. Pers. pron. :

sumenzan : without exception 4 sumenzan : 179.9; 277
4) 3. pers. plur. nom. Dem.JPers.

pron. : ke : passim ki-i : KBo XVI 46; 179.5 ( ~)
ape: passim ke-e : KBo XV 10; KBo XVI 31;
KBo XVI 45; 179.9
a-pe-e: KBo XVI 47, 179.9 ( ~)
a-pu-us : 354.1
5) 3. pers. plur. gen. Dem.JPers.
pron. : kenzan : 14.2; 181 A
6) dat. sing. Enclitic Pers. pron. :

-se : everywhere in "Old Script" -se: 179.9 (exceptional), but usually
-si
7) 3. pers. plur. nom. comm. gen.
Enclitic pron. : -e : everywhere -at: KBo XVI 47; 179.4; 179.6;
except in 181 B par. 31 (-at !) 179.9; 276; 277; 283 0; 354.1
8) 3. pers. plur. nom.Jacc. neut.
Enclitic pron. : -e or -at -e : 275
-at ; more common
9) 3. pers. plur. ace. comm. gen. -us: KBo XV 10; KBo XVI 47;
Enclitic pron. : predominantly 179.6; 179.7; 277
-us. It seems as if the rise of -as : KBo XV 10; 277; 354.1
-as was influenced by ... -ma-/
-ia- and also by namma-
10) Possessive pronoun :
-mi- : passim -mi- : 275; 276
ace. -man : 6; 27; 28.4; 308 5 ace. -man: 275 (= 274)
-ti- : passim -ti- : 275; 276
-si- : passim -si-: KBo XV 10; KBo XVI 47;
ace. -san : 4.1; 5; 6; 9; 21.2; 179.6; 275; 277
24; 27; 181 B; 184 J; 324 ~ 538 s
4 See already Carruba, Verbalendungen, pp. 85-86 for this criterion.

5 For this criterion see Carruba et alii, Bemerl.:ungen, p. 18.
a D
Hatt. : ammuk; ukila
sumenzan: 87; 88; 95; 96; (97.1) sumenzan: 32 D; 38; 282 AfB (Murs.),
apenzan: 95 but sumella in 279.4 (Murs.).
ke-e : 87 ; 88 ; 96 ke : 38 (passim)
ape : 38 III ; 27 (cf. Neu, Interpre-
tation, p. 24 note 1)
Murs.fHatt. : ku-u-us
a-pu-u-us
ke-el: 94 apel: 35 B
ke-e-el: 89
-se : 171.3 (exceptional), but -si : passim (in 36.2 B -se, but this
usually -si text belongs to Oat. 94 and group C)
-e: 172 (?) -at: 33 B

-at : 88; 89; 96; 176 N
-e : 176 B (ne-et-ta) -e : 38 (ne-et-ta); until the young-

-at : more common est texts -e remains in use in order
to differentiate ne-et-ta from
na-at-ta, cf. D.J.N. Lee, ArchOr
XXXIV (1966), p. 22 note 29
-us : 85; 88; 89; 95; 172 -as: 35 B; 38
-as : 85; 88; 89; 95; 171.3; Murs.fHatt.fLater treaties
176 E1,2, E2 +
L2 exclusively -as
-mi- : 85; 86; 88; 89; 124.6 -mi-: 38

ace. -man : 85; 124.6 ( 1) ace. -min in 279.2 (Murs.)
-ti- : 89 ace. -tin in 11.71 (VBoT 1 !)
-si- : 85; 87; 88; 89; 96; 112; -si- : 171.4
178.1 and also KBo XVI 50 Sporadic examples in later texts
A B
-smi- : passim -smi- : KBo XV 10; 283 0
ace. -sman : 184 J ; 184 Q
11) Defective Dem. pron. :
si-i-el : 6
12) Relative pron. ace. plur. comm.
gen. : ku-i-us : 17; 20 ku-i-us : KBo XV 10; (274); 275;
283 0
13) 3rd pers. sing. Present mi-conj.
-i-i->-i-e- >-Ha- 6
i-e-mi : 324 (but also Ha-mi)
i-iz-zi : 25.4; 122.6; 181 A; 181 B
i-e-zi : 9; 181 A i-e-zi : 175 B
i-e-ez-zi : 6, 21.2; 18; 181 A; i-e-ez-zi : 178.10; 179.9
181 B; 184 Q; 184 J
ia-az-zi : 122.6
[i-ia]-az-zi : 21.2 Ha-az-zi : 277
i-e-en-zi : 21.2; 27
i-en-zi : 181 B i-en-zi : 283 0 (but i-ia-an-zi in
ia-an-zi : 122.6 283 A)
It seems as if already all the forms
co-exist within Old Hittite, cf.
su-wa-ia-az-zi and [d]a-a-ia-az-zi
in 184 Q
u-e-mi-iz-zi : 24; 122.6; 181 A
U.-e-mi-e-ez-zi : 181 B; 181 J ku-ud-da-ni-e-ez-zi : 179.9
u-e-mi-ia-az-zi : 24; 181 B
i-e-et : 5; 6; 21.2; 24 nu-un-tar-ri-id-du : 179.9

nu-un-tar-ri-e-ed-du : 179.9
nu-un-tar-i-e-ed-du : 179.6
sar-:g.i-i-e-ed-du : 179.9
14) l. pers. plur. in -wani : 7 ar-nu-us-ki-u-wa-ni : 277
ak-ku-us-ke-e-wa-ni : 122.6 ga-li-ib.-li-is-ki-u-wa-ni : 203/f
e-du-wa-a-ni : 308 gal-zi-wa-ni : 277
ga-an-da-u-ni : 277
gar-wa-ni: 28.9; 324 gar-wa-ni: XXXIV 58
6 For this criterion see already Oarruba, Kratylos VII (1962), p. 157; Oarruba et alii, Bemerkungen,
pp. 13-14; Oarruba, Verbalendungen, pp. 83, 84-85, 86; Friedrich, JOS XXI (1967), pp. 49-50.
7 See especially the articles by Oarruba referred to on p. 8 note 2.
c D
-sm.i- : 85; 96; 124.6
si-e-ta-ni : 89
ku-i-us : 88 (cf. ku-i-us-ga in ku-i-e-es : 35 B

the same text) ; 17 4
i-ia-m.i : 38
i-e-si : 38 (but also i-fa-si)
i-e-zi : 38
i-e-ez-zi : 95 i-e[ez-zi] : 38 (but also i-ia[-zi]
and i-ia-az-zi)
But note i-e-ez-zi in 279.2 (Murs.)
i-en-zi: 88 i-en-zi: 38
da-a-ia-az-zi : 88
tu-u-re-e-ez-zi : 95
u-e-m.i-e-ez-zi : 95 u-e-m.i-e-ez-zi : 36.2 B (= 94 and C)
u-e-m.i-az-zi : 178.1 su-u-i-e-ez-zi : 36.2 B (= 94 and C)
u-e-m.i-ia-az-zi : 171.3; 176 M But note ti-i-e-et in 284 A (Murs.)
i-e-et : 85 B; 89 (but note and i-e?[-et] as restored in 279.1
i-ia-at in 88) (colophon ; also Murs.)
se-es-ki-e-ed-du : 176 M
a-u-ma-ni: 117. 1 (VBoT 1)
:Q_ar-wa-ni: KBo XVI 50

18 THE RECORDS OF THE EARLY ffiTTITE EMPIRE
A B
i-ia-u-ni : 283 0 8
ku-un-ga-as-ki-u-wa-ni : 277
li-la-a-ri-is-ki-wa-ni : KBo XV 10
li-in-ga-nu-ma-ni : 277
me-mi-is-ki-u-wa-ni : XXXIV 58; 277
pa-a-i-wa-ni : 308 pa-a-i-wa-ni : 175 B
pa-a-i-wa-a-ni : 308 si-pa-an-du-wa-ni : 175 B
pa-i-wa-ni : 324 ti-ia-u-ni : 277
par-su-wa-ni: 324 da-su-wa-gu-wa-ni : 175 B
te-ek-ku-us-nu-ma-ni : 175 B
u-wa-te-wa-ni : 175 B
zi-ik-ki-u-wa-ni : 277
SIGs-ag-gu-ni : 277
SIGs-ag-ge-es-ki-u-w[a-ni] : 277
]-ag-gu-wa-ni : 122.6 ]-wa-ni : XXXIV 58
15) 2nd pers. plur. in -tani :
is-ta-ma-as-ta-ni : 23.1
pa-it-ta-ni : 23.1 nu-un-tar-ri-it-ta-ni : 179.9
[x]-as-nu-us-ki-it-ta-ni : 289
ku-e-u-e-en: KBo XVI 47 9
16) 3rd pers. sing. Preterite :gi- conj. :the

overwhelming majority end in -s. I
cite only examples of verbs also
showing -sta in later times : akkis,
galzais, gullis, isig:gis, maniya:g:gis
naesjnais, pais, pennis, sakkis, sun-
nas, daisjdais, dalis, tarnas, LUA- tarnas : KBo XV 10, but note
GRIG-:gis, but note memista, [lu]k- issista : KBo XV 10
kista, ulesta
Medio-Passive:
Typical for Old and Middle Hittite is a dynamic use of the Medio-Passive (not
reflexive or passive, but about synonomous with the Active in transitive function),
cf. Neu, Interpretation, passim, and Grundlagen, p. 54 ff. and 106 ff. :
8 Cf. Carruba, Die I. und 11. Pers. Plur., p. 18 note 10 a.

9 Cf. Neu, IF LXXIII (1968), p. 173 in his important review on von Schuler's book, Die Kalfkiier.
0 D
:Q.ar-ru-wa-ni : 95
:Q.a-at-ra-a-u-ni : 89
is-ta-ma-as-su-wa-ni :
KBo XVI 50 [li-in-k] i-is-ki-u-wa-ni : 171.1
pa-a-i-u-wa-ni : 38
pa-a-i-wa-a?-n[i] : 38
wa-al-:Q.u-wa-ni : 95
]-wa-ni: 96
ma-li-is-ku-nu-ut-ta-n[i] : 88 is-ta-ma-as-ta-ni : 171.5
na-is-ta-ni : 88
[ta-as-nu]-ut-ta-ni : 88
U.-wa-te-et-ta-ni : 95; 96 B
U.-wa-at-te-et-ta-ni : 96 A
ku-e-u-en : 86
sunnes: 33 B
:Q.al-za-is : 88 Hatt. : sunnasjsunnista
tarnas: 89 Murs. : tarnas
but note : paista : 88 Hatt. : tarnasjtarnista
memista: 89 Murs.jHatt. :cf. nai-fpai-jtai-
dalesta: 89 Murs. : dalestajtalesta
unniesta : 89 Murs.jHatt. : unnesta
A B
:Q_uet-J:Q_uittiya- A: 12; 14.1; 24; 308 :Q_uittiya- A: 179.2; 276
M : 5 ; 184 Q; 184 J
par:Q_- A : 4.1; 21.2 par:Q_- A : KBo XVI 47
M: 179.2; 179.5
sarra- A: 122.6; 181 A; 181 B sarra- A: KBo XVI 47; 155; 178.10;
M: 6; 9; 25.4 179.6; 277
M: KBo XVI 47; 179.1; 275;
283 0 (active in 283 A)
za:Q_:g_iya- A: KBo XVI 47; 178.10;
277; 283 0
M: KBo XVI 47; 175; 179.
6 ( ?)
18) Verbs in -a:g_:Q_- :

3rd pers. sing. Present in -i :
aliapa:g_:g_i : 324
:Q_appina:Q_:Q_i: 268
inara:Q_:g_i : 538
suppiya:g_:g_i : 184 Q ; 184 J
walkissar[(a:g_:g_i)] : 184 J /K tatra:Q_:g_i : 178.10
3rd pers. sing. Preterite in-s 1 o :
isibbis: 24
iskuna:g_:g_is : 6
maniyahhis : 22.2 ; 24
watarna:Q_:g_is : 26.1
but note:
[kurur]iya:Q_ta : 8.2
mani:Q_ta : 308
19) nai- Jpai- jtai- : n

2nd pers. sing. Present
10 See So=er, HAB, p. 222.

11 Similar conclusions were already published by Miss Ka=enhuber, Altkleinasiatische. Sprachen,
p. 235 ff. and especially pp. 237-238.
LINGUISTIO.AL EVIDENCE 21
c D
guittiya- A : 85 b-uittiya- A : 38 (Murs. : A and
Hatt.: A/P)
parb-- A:89;96;178.1 Always active, as far as I have
M: 89 been able to ascertain
sarra- A : 88 ; 89 sarra- A : 35 B ; 38
M: 87; 88; 89; 96; 178.1 Murs. : sarra- A/R (Active or
Reflexive)
za:g_:g_iya- A : 88 ; 89 ; 95 ; 99 za:g_:g_iya- A : 35 B
M: 85; 88; 89; (97.1); M: 171.5

(170); 171.3 Murs. : zag:g_iya- A/R
Hatt. : zag:g_iya- A
Murs. : [kuru]riyab-zi
Muw. : ]JUL-ab-zi
mauiyab-zi : 95 In later treaties :
idalawagzi
watarnab-b-i : 171.3 kururiyab-zi
Murs. : isiyagta
idalawagta
kururiyagta
sakiyagta
daswagta
watarnagta
[t]atrab-b-as : 85 lR-ab-ta
watarnagta : 89 Muw. : lR-ab-ta
Hatt. : katteragta
kuru[riyagta]
sallakartagta
Treaties : kururiyagta
.A B
na-it-ti: 6 [p]a-it-ti~ : 179.2
tajda-it-ti : 25.4; 26.1
2nd pers. sing. Preterite

pa-it-ta: 6 na-it-ta : 275
3rd pers. sing. Preterite

[na-a]-es : 27 na-is: 275
na-i-is : 4.1
pa-is : 4.1; 5; 8.1; 11; 24; 26.1; pa-is: KBo XVI 47; 275; 276
26.2; 308
pa-a-is : 24; 308
da-is: 7; 24 da-is ; KBo XV 10; 179.6
da-i-is: 24
da-a-is : 3.2; 4.1; 4.2; 6; 11;
12; 21.2; 24; 28.12
Syntax
1) "Directive" in -a :
nouns : passim karuiliyatta : 276
pers. names : passim la-ah-ha : KBo XVI 47; 179.9, but
place names : passim la-ah-hi : 175
In Old Hittite both URU____ a and The construction is preserved
URU____i uwa-Juwate- can be in a few expressions
found
poss. pron. : passim
2) ".Adverb" in stressed
frontposition :
In Old Hittite andan, istarnafi, .Apparently the construction is
kattaji, piran and ser losing in importance; few exam-
katti-mi : 5; 26.1; 26.3; 289 ples with adverbs other than
kattaji
katti-si : 14.2; 20; 26.1 katti-si ; 179.6; 275; 276
katti-smi : 3.2
a D
na-it-ti : 89( ~) ; 95 ( 1) Treaties : na-it-tijne-ia-ti
Murs. : pa-is-tijpe-es-ti
Muw.jHatt. : pe-es-ti
Murs. : da-it-ti
pa-it-ta : 89 Murs. : pa-is-ta Muw. : pe-es-ta

Hatt. : da-is-ta
na-is : 89 Murs. : na-es-tajna-is-ta

Hatt. : na-a-is
pa-is : 89; 178.1 Murs. : pa-isfpa-is-tafpe-es-ta/
but note pa-is-ta : 88 pi-is-ta
Hatt. : pa-isjpe-es-ta
da-is: 89 Murs.jMuw.jHatt. : da-a-is
da-a-is : 85; 172 For the doubtful forms ta-it-ta
and pa-it-ta in XXIII 70 ! III :
14 and 13, see Neu, Interpretation,
p. 161
la-a-a:Q_-:Q_a : 89 Murs. : la:g_:g_i

la-a:Q_-:Q_a : 95 Hatt. : la:g_:g_i
tapusa : 86 : 97.4 Murs. : sena:Q_:Q_a, tapusa and also
Note URU _____i uwate-/ karuiliyatta
ar:Q_a uwa- or ar- : 85; 86; 172 Muw. : sena:g_:Q_a, tapusa and also
s.A-ta
Hatt. : tapusa, SA-ta
par-na-as-sa : 96
KUR-e-as-sa : 85
katti-mi : 89 katti-mi : 38
katti-ti : 89 Murs. : istarni-smi
katti-si: KBo XVI 50; 88; 96; (97.3)
katti-smi : 96; (97.3)
24 THE RECORDS OF THE EARLY IDTTITE EMPIRE
A B
3) Particles
Examples of variation -astaf-kan within one text (in the chosen examples
preverbs are absent)
ispart- : without particle
karp- : without particle
kuen- : -kan or 0
sarra- : -asta or 0 sarra- -asta(-kan : 155, cf.

sarra- -asta : 179.9; 275; 276; 277;
283 0
sarra- -kan: KBo XVI 47; 179.6
In my opinion the interchange between -aSta and -kan in the Middle Hittite
texts - an interchange which can also be seen between the various recensions
of one composition (cf. Chapter II) - proves that -asta and -kan can "fill" the
same "slot". Examples like those given here, where apparently both could occur
with originally an appreciable difference in meaning, probably formed the starting-
post for the gradual replacement of -asta by -kan (see on this development Oarruba,
Orientalia XXXIII (1964), p. 436 note 1 and D.J.N. Lee, ArchOr XXXIV (1966),
pp. 10-11 and Appendix B).
4) ma-a-an temp.fcond., cf. ma-a-an cond. : KBo XVI 45, 46 and
A. Hahn, Language XX (1944), p. 47; 94; 175; 178.10; 179.3; 179.
91 ff. and R. Sternemann, MIO 5; 179.6; 179.9; 275; 276; 283 0;
XI (1966}, p. 231 ff. and p. 377 ff. 354.1
ma-a-an comp. : 276; 283 0
ma(-a)-a:g-:ga-an comparative : ma(-a)-a:g-:ga-an comp. : KBo XV 10;
passim KBo XVI 47; 179.9; 275; 276;
277; XXXIV 58
ma(-a)-a:g-:ga-an temp. : 277
c D
ispart- -astaf-kan : 89 Murs.(Hatt. : ispart- -kan

karp- -astaf-kan : 178.1 Murs. : karp- -kan/0
Hatt. : karp- 0
kuen- -astaf-kan : 85; 89, Murs.(Hatt. : kuen- -kan
cf. kuen- -asta : (97.1); 178.1
sarra- -astaf-kan : 88 Murs. : sarra- -kan
sarra- -asta : 96; 178.1
sarra- -kan : 89; 96
ma-a-an temp. : 85; 88; 172 In later times ma-a-an usually is

ma-a-an cond. : 87; 88; 89; 94; conditional, but some sporadic ex-
95; 96; 124.6; 171.3; 172 ; amples of temporal use are still to be
176 L and M; 178.1; KBo found, cf. Sternemann, Le.
XVI 50
ma(-a)-a:Q_-:Q_a-an comp. : 88; 89; Both uses co-exist in later time,
171.3 cf. Sternemann, I.e.
ma(-a)-a:Q_-:Q_a-an temp. : 85; 88; 89;

95; 171.3; 176 L, M and N
Chart II
A. Similarities in content matter

a. Cat. 87 (XXIII 68) II : 2-6 "' 88 Rev. : 67 ff. "' 95 (XXIII 77) Obv. : 90-92 :
only free men, not slaves or mercenaries, should join the king's army.
b. Cat. 88 Rev. : 8 (15 ?), a-ap-pa SIGma-is-ta[-an ma-s]i-wa-an-ta-an U-UL
ap[-pa-an-zi] "' KBo XVI 4:7 Obv. : 8, [ma]-a-an SIGma-is-ta-an-na ma-si-
wa-an-ta-an wa-as-ta-an-zi.
c. Cat. 88 Rev. : 4:8 ff. "' 99 (XXVI 29 +XXXI 55): 16 ff. :there should be no
consideration for relatives or acquiantances amidst the enemy forces (cf.
Klengel, ZA LVII N.F. 23 (1965), p. 228).
d. Cat. 95 (XXIII 77) Obv. : 52 ff. "' 171.3 II : 10 : the case of the fugitive
who brings property along (cf. Alp, Instructions, p. 4:14:).
e. Cat. 172 III : 3 ff. "' 17 6 M IV : 7 (= von Schuler, H ethitische Dienstanwei-
sungen, p. 62) : measures for the protection of royal granaries (cf. von Schuler,
Hethitische Konigserlasse, p. 4:56).
f. Cat. 178.1 I : 10 ff.; II : 22 ff. "' 179.9 (KBo XVI 25) I : 15 : a typical enume-
ration of high officials (cf. von Schuler, W ilrdentriigereide, p. 217 note 3).
g. Cat. 178.1 I: 19 ff. "' 179.9 (KBo XVI 25) Ill: 6 ff.: punishment of him-
be it a magnate or an ordinary soldier - who is responsible for the execution
of an innocent man (cf. Otten, Inhaltsilbersicht KBo XVI, p. V).
h. Cat. 178.1 I : 10 ff., na-as A-NA DUTU-SJ a-a-ra e-es-du, "and he (the
culprit) shall appertain to the king" ("der (Schuldige) soli dem Konig rechtens
zusteb.en", von Schuler, Hethitische Konigserlasse, p. 4:58); I : 24:, na-at-ta-
at-si a-a-ra, "and it does not appertain to the king" ("Ihm (dem Konig)
(steht) es nicht rechtens (zu)", von Schuler, ibidem, p. 4:59) "' 179.9 (KBo
XVI 25) III : 13, na-at-se a[-a-ra e-es-tu], "and it shall appertain to him"
(see also ibidem Ill : 20, a-a-ra e-es-tu, in a broken context).
B. Similarities in structure :
a. Gods as witnesses in the beginning of the text :
C: Cat. 87 (XXVI 4:1) I : 4: ff. D: Cat. 38 I 7 : 4:1 - End of Column
95 (XXIII 77) Obv. : 2 ff. 39 I! : 6 ff. (another Hayasa
96 (KBo VIII 35) II : 8 ff. treaty)
170 (XXVI 11) I: 7 ff. 171.1 (XXVI 57) I : 11 ff.
(171.5 (XXIII 82) Obv.).
Von Schuler, Sonderformen, p. 4:50 and Staatsvertriige und Dokumente, p. 38
together with note 28, sees in this feature a typical characteristic of treaties
(and instructions, cf. Cat. 170 and 171 !) concluded with a group of persons
("Die veranderte Stellung der Gotterliste konnte durch die uns im einzelnen
unbekannte Verfahrensweise bei der Vereidigung einer Mehrzahl von Per-

sonen bedingt sein").
b. Lists of those who are put under oath:
C : Cat. 87 (XXIII 68) II : 11 ff.
88 Rev. : 32 a/32 ff. (see already Obv. : 93 ff.)
96 (KBo VIII 35) II : 25 ff.
99 (XXVI 29 + XXXI 55) : 1 ff.
This feature is conditioned by the circumstance that in these texts the other
contracting party consists of a group of persons, cf. von Schuler, Sonderfor-
men, p. 446 ff. and Staatsvertrage und Dokumente, p. 38.
c. Direct discourse of those who are put under oath (collective oath) : according
to von Schuler, Hethitische Konigserlasse, p. 458 together with note 85, Cat.
178.1 is formulated as a DUGUD-oath, witness the first person plural of the
present tense in line 5 (for the DUGUD-oath see Cat. 175 and cf. Staatsver-
trage und Dokumente, p. 48).
N.B. For the points mentioned under this heading - clearly valid for the
is:giul both as a treaty and an instruction - it is hard to decide whether
they are merely dependent on the type of text - a contract with a group
of persons -, or whether in addition to this a historical factor is also involved.
It could be that Tudhaliyas and Arnuwandas instead of using "international
treaties" purposely applied a different type of text which had been devel-
oped for internal administrative use. In that case the connections with texts
of the early Suppiluliumas' period might be of particular significance, because
these might indicate that even Suppiluliumas still pursued a similar policy.
C. Lexical correspondencies :
a-pe-e-ez-zi-ia : C Cat. 88 Rev. : 63; 95 (XXIII 77) I : 54
QATI esharnu- : C Cat. 88 Rev. : 29, 29-30, 64-65; 89 Obv. : 26-27; Rev. :
19; 47 (cf. already Goetze, Kizzuwatna, p. 76 note 304)
b.uta- B Cat. 179.9 (KBo XVI 25) I : 46
C Cat. 171.3 I : 5
D Cat. 171.5 (XXI 47 + XXIII 82) IV : 13
pangarit ninink- : C Cat. 89 Obv. : 45; (97.4 : 18); 99 (XXVI 29 + XXXI
55) : 15
linkiya kattan tai-: B KBo XVI 47 I : 15-16; 179.6 I : 22; III : 9, 15; IV :
9 ( ?), 19-20, 24-25, 28
C Cat. 88 Rev. : 2, 37; 89 Obv. : 13-14, 27, 28, 43; Rev. :
[15], 48 ( ?) ; 95 (XXIII 77) Obv. : 1; 96 (KBo VIII 35)
II : 28-29, 31, 31, 32-33, 34, 35 ( ?) ; III : 5; (97.2 : 10)
D Cat. 38 I 6: 38-39 and IV 45: 50-51
See in this respect von Schuler, Die Kaskiier, p. 116: "Die aktivische Wendung
findet sich ausserhalb von Kaskaervertragen m. W. nur noch in Urkunden
aus der letzten Zeit des Neuen Reiches: XXIII 72 Rev. 2, 37 (vgl. E. Laroche,
OLZ 1957. 135) und Madd. Vs. 27; vgl. aber auch Hukk. IV 50 f."
karsiza:Q.:giya-: B Cat. 175 (XXXI 44) II: 14-15; 179.6 IV: 13
C Cat. 88 Rev. : 40, [41], 66; 89 Obv. : 29, 30, 31, 32;
99 (XXVI 29 +XXXI 55): 11, 16; 171.3 I: 5
D Cat. 171.5 (XXI 47 + XXIII 82) IV : 17
EREM.MES-(n)a-: A Cat. 7 (XXXVI 100) Rev. : 6; 324 : passim (cf. Neu,
IF LXXIII (1968), p. 175) 12
B Cat. 179.6 Ill : 9, 10, 16; 179.9 (KBo XVI 25) I : 6, 31
C Cat. 88 Rev. : 18; 96 (KBo VIII 35) Ill: 5
See in this respect von Schuler, Die Kaskiier, p. 116 and Neu in his review, Le.
DUTU-BI-is B Cat. 179.9 (KBo XVI 25) I : 46; IV : 62
D Cat. 38 I 3 : 15; IV 43 : 45; 171.4 (XXI 41) : 9
(all three passages show DUTU-BI-in)
.A-!JI-TI([AjBU) B Cat. 275 Obv. : 16, 17
C Cat. 89 Obv. : 56
12 But see H. Otten and V. Soucek, Ein althethitisches Ritual fur das Konigspaar (SBT n 8, Wiesbaden,
1969), pp. 81-82 for the interpretation EREM.MES-n + -an. On the basis of other Old Hittite passages
I also decided for the existence of a particule -an, cf. p. 31 note 4 and p. 32.
II. THE LINGUISTIOAL INTERPRETATION OF TEXTUAL VARIANTS
As was stated in the Introduction, this alternative hypothesis for the distribution
of the Hittite historical texts is based on two assumptions, first that the Hittite
language shows a gradual development from the oldest composition (Anittas)
over Old and Middle Hittite texts up to the later and last ones just before the
final destruction of the capital around 1200 B.O., and secondly that the Hittite
scribes sometimes adapted their copies for actual use to the more modern usage
of their own days as regards spelling and language (e.g. laws, instructions, official
prayers, festival texts and mythological interpolations in rituals). The first assump-
tion is a fairly logical one : the language is bound to change during such a long
stretch of time (about five centuries in all). The linguistical evidence presented
in the preceding chapter gives a representative - although by no means complete
- selection of those characteristics in which this development can be most
easily spotted.
But the second assumption - i.e. that the Hittite scribes sometimes "moder-
nized" their copies for actual use - requires some adstruction too. Perhaps I
may start out by pointing to Sternemenn's article Temporale und konditionale
Nebensiitze des Hethitischen (MIO XI (1966), pp. 231 ff. and 377 ff.) and to the
joint article Kleine Bemerkungen zur jungsten Fassung der hethitischen Gesetze
(ArchOr XXXIII (1965), pp. 1-18), written by Oarruba, Soucek and Sternemann.
In both articles a similar approach was fruitfully applied to the different versions
of the Hittite Laws. Chart III may serve to summarize their findings as far as
the differences between copy A and related manuscripts for Tablet I of the Laws
are concerned as compared to the main later version (manuscript B). I am not
now concerned with the late Parallel-Version, but I have enlarged their material
in width by the inclusion of several additional data.
Chart III
A B
Spelling:
i-is-sa-i ( 41) is-sa-i
i-is-te[-en] ( 55) e-es-te-en
mi-im-ma-an-zi ( 55) me-im-ma-an-zi (sic!)
se-e-er-si-it-wa ( 95) se-er-wa-a s-si
Grammar:
I) 3rd pers. dat. -se (passim) -si (but -se preserved m
30 THE RECORDS OF THE EARLY HITTITE EJiiiPIRE
sing. Enclitic ll, 23, 28 A and 95)

pers. pron.
2) 3rd pers. plur. -e ( 49, 53) -e ( 49, 53) but -at (3 x)
nom. comm. gen. in the additional par. 31
Enclitic pron.
3) 3rd pers. plur. -us( 79) -as
ace. comm. gen.
Enclitic pron.
4) 3rd pers. sing. .i-iz-zi/ .i-i-iz-zi; .i-iz-zi preserved in 43,
Present mi-conj. 1 see also i-e-e[z-zi] 46, 48, 78, 80, but else-
( 55) /i-e-zi ( 26) where .i-i-e-ez-zi/ .-i-ia-az-
zi/ .i-ia-zi
5) 3rd pers. sing. da-su-wa-a]J.-]Ji ( 7, da-su-wa-a]J.-bi ( 7, 8) but
Present verbs in 8) jta-su-wa-a]J-bi ( 77) [ta}Su-wa-a]J-zi in 77
-abb.-
Syntax:
a) Gen.- noun- IR-na-as na-as-ma GEME-as IR-na-an na-as-ma GEME-
Poss. pron. 2 Q.A-.A.Z-ZU na-as-ma GIR- an Q.A.-.A.Z-ZU na-as-ma
Su ( 12) GIR-SU
LU.ULU.LU-as EL-L.A.M- LU.ULU.LU-an EL-L.A.M
as KIR4-se-et ( 13) KIR4-se-et
b) Adverb in stressed se-e-er-si-it-wa sar-ni- se-er-wa-as-si sar-ni-ik-
frontposition ik-mi ( 95) m[(i)]
is-]Ja-a-as-si-s[a se-er- is-]Ja-as-se-sa se-er sar-
si-i]t sar-ni-ik-zi ( 99) ni-ik-zi
c) Change fAddition 0 ...... an-da si-it-ta- nu-za ...... an-da si-i[a-
of particles 3 ri-iz-zi ( 40) at-t]a-ri-ia-zi
nu ...... an-da si-it-ta- nu-za ...... an-da si-ia-
ri-iz-z.i ( 41) at-ta-ri-i-e-ez-zi
tak-ku IR-as SAL-na[-an tak-ku-za IR-is SAL-an
da-a-i] ( 32 A) DAM-in? da-a-i
tak-ku IR-as GEME-an tak-ku-za IR-is GEME-an
da-a-i ( 33) da-a-i
1 See the beautiful paradigm in Carruba et alii, Bemerkungen, p. 13.

2 Cf. the remarks by Carruba et alii, Bemerkungen, pp. 1415.
3 See the remarks by Carruba et alii, Bemerkungen, pp. 810 (-za) and pp. 10-13 (-kan).
LINGUISTIOAL INTERPRETATION OF TEXTUAL VARIANTS 31
nu-us-se-an 4 an-da da-a- nu-us-si-kan an-da da-a-i

i ( 78)
[a]n-da-as-se ................. . an-da-ia-as-si-kan? ........ .
pa-a-i ( 70) ... pa-a-1
d) Change/Addition 0 in a coordinated clause nu( 9, 40, 41, 55, 77 A,
of conjunctions 77 A)
nu-za ( 40)
0 in a main clause nu ( 40, 41, 41, 42, 94)
nu-us-si ( 20, 44A)
ta(47B) omitted in main clause
ta-as ( 40) na-as
ta-as-se ( 47 A) na-an-si
e) takku> man 5 takku ( 40, 41) ma-a-an
In order to make my point clearer and in an attempt to widen the scope of this
study I shall continue with a few examples of modernization drawn from a
mythological text, XVII 10 (Oat. 258 I A), the most important manuscript for
the Telibinus Myth. In my opinion this tablet constitutes a copy of a ritual from
the beginning of the Empire period, in which an Old Hittite myth had been
incorporated 6 Both the spelling and the language of the mythological inter-
polation go back to the Old Hittite period. This also holds good for the Storm-
god version of essentially the same myth (Oat. 261) 7 Other mythological texts,
and some rituals too, show all the characteristics of the Old Hittite language.
Fortunately there are important indications in their content matter which point
in the same direction : 1. the gods mentioned in these texts all belong to the
Hattian pantheon and not to the distinctly later Hurrian layer of Hittite religion
(cf. the subtitle chosen for Laroche's collection : Mythologie anatolienne); 2. the
place names mentioned in some of them - see e.g. Nerik, Tarukka and Tinipiya
in Oat. 257 - belong to those northern regions which were lost to the Gasgaean
tribes in the beginning of the Empire period.
4 In Bemerkungen, p. 11 by Oarruba et alii, a text-emendation to <-ga>-an is proposed in order

to eliminate this anomaly but there happen to be more examples of this particle -an (see a forthcoming
article on my part, A rare particle -an in Old Hittite : origin, use and implication.s).
5 See Oarruba et alii, Bemerlcungen, pp. 5-7 with bibliographical references.
6 See already Oarruba, Wisurijanza, p. 32 for the consistently used spelling ma-a-aj}-j}a-an on this
tablet; see, too, the end of Chapter ID.
7 With two exceptions (XXXVI 71 : 6 and XXXIII 26 : ll) copy 0 even consistently writes na-at-ta,
cf. Diagrams ll-12 of Chapter Ill.
32 THE RECORDS OF THE EARLY HITTITE EJ\IIPIRE
Chart IV
XVII 10
N.B. I have selected my examples from those parts which are clearly mytho-
logical in character : I : 1-39 ; II : 33-36 ; III : 1-12 and 28-34; IV : 1-7 and 14-
26. The surrounding sections belong to the mugawar, the supplication, as described
by Laroche, La Priere hittite, p. 22.
Spelling : 1) consistently ma-a-a:Q_-:Q_a-an (also in the parts belonging to the
ritual, but twice- for reasons of space- Laroche restores GIM-an,
II : 24, 25, cf. Mythologie anatolienne, p. 93)
2) many stressed plene writings, e.g. ki-i-sa-ti (I : 18), te-e-kan (II : 34)
3) mi-im-ma-as (I : 8, 9)
4) u-wa-an-ti-wa-an-ta-az (II : 33), cf. u-wa-as-ta-i (Oat. 25.4), u-wa-
ar-ka-an-ta-an (Oat. 4.1), u-wa-a-ar-ra (Oat. 27)
5) free variantion between EGIR-pa and a-ap-pa (in the texts as a
whole, i.e. including the ritual, first EGIR-pa in I : 27; II : 8;
III : 3, and afterwards only a-ap-pa in III : 27; IV : 14, 19,20).
Grammar: I 3. pers. plur. nom. Dem.fPers. pron. : ape (cf. a-pi-ia in I : 15)
II 3. pers. plur. nom. comm. gen. Enclitic pron. : -e (I : 20)
III 3. pers. plur. ace. comm. gen. Enclitic pron. : -us (IV : 25)
IV ace. Poss. pron. 3rd pers. sing. : -sa-an (III : 11, 11, 12)
V Dynamic Medio-Passive form: a-us-ta-at (II: 35), :Q_u-e-ez-ta (IV: 1,2)
Syntax : a) Directive in -a : p:h-na-as-sa (IV : 20)
b) Adverb in stressed frontposition : kat-ti-ti (IV : 1)
c) Particle -an s : an-da-da-an :Q_ar-ak-zi (IV : 17)
d) Conjunction su : sa-as (I : 34)
Lexical use : A es- Active "to sit" (III : 30), cf. Oat. 21.2; 308; 324
B :Q_uet- (instead of huittiya-), cf. :Q_u-e-ez-ta (IV : 1,2), cf. :Q_u-e-et-
ti-an-ta in copy Q of Tablet II of the Laws, par. 82, III : 6 in "Old
Script"
0 lelaniya- (II : 33; IV : 4), cf. copy A of Tablet I of the Laws,
par. 38, II : 14, le-e[-la]-ni-at-ta "' B kartimmiya- (in the ritual
kartimmiya- is regularly used !)
Both texts- XVII 10 and the Storm-god version- may be compared to other,
slightly modernized versions, one of which is connected with the name of As-
munikal, wife of Arnuwandas I and well-known queen of the Middle Hittite
period, and another with the name of queen Harapsili (see Chart V).
s See p. 31 note 4.
Chart V
XVII 10 (Laroche, Myth. anatolienne, The God of Queen Asmunikal (Laro-

p. 89 ff.) che, Myth. anatolienne, p. 119 ff. =
Cat. 262.1 etc.)
Change/Addition
of particles :
a) I-N A TUR an-da UDUJ]I.A KI! [:Q.]i-li-is-sa-an UD[UJ]I.A
MIN 1 u-i-su-ri-ia-at-ta-ti]
b) I-NA E.GUD an-da-an GUDJ]I.A [E].GUD-kan an-da GUD.HI.A-u[s
u-i-su-u-ri-ia-an-ta-ti KI.MIN]
c) ne 0-ULis-pi-i-e-er na-at-za n[a-at-ta is-pi-
Note the difference between -e ia-an-zi]
and -at and the preservation of na-at-za U[-UL is-pi-ir] (KBo
na-at-ta in one of the Middle XIV 86 + I : 18, ibidem, p. 132)
Hittite versions ; see also :
ne-ez is-pi-e-er (Storm-god na-at-za is-pi-e-er (version
version, ibidem, p. 116). of Queen Harapsili, ibidem,
p. 122 ff. = Cat. 262.2 etc.)
[n]a-at-za is-pi-ir (XXXIII
32 Ill : 5, ibidem, p. 126 =
Cat. 262.5)
XVII 10 Other versions Tel.-myth
d) ku-it an-da-an pa-iz-zi ku-it-kan an-da pa-iz-zi
(Second version, ibidem, p.
98 ff. = Cat. 258. 2, D Ill :
8-9; note, however, that A
IV : 12 omits -kan)
e) na-as-ta nam-ma sa-ra-a U-UL na-at-kan nam-ma sa-ra-a
u-iz-zi U-UL u-iz-zi (Second version)
f) Gise-ia-az-kan UDU-as KUSkur- na-as-ta GISe-ia-a[z UDU-as
sa-as kan-kan-za KUSkur-sa-as] kan-kan-za
(XXXIII 12 IV: 14-15, ibidem,
p. 107 = Cat. 259.2)
These examples chosen from two widely different genres, the Laws and the Mytho-
logical texts, prove beyond doubt that Old Hittite compositions were modernized
during the Middle Hittite period. But this also happened to originally Middle
Hittite texts during the last two centuries of the New Empire. I shall limit the
discussion in this Chapter to two examples chosen from group B, the undoubtedly
Middle Hittite texts : Cat. 283 C as compared to 283 A (period of Mursilis II);
Cat. 275 and 276 9 as compared to Cat. 274 and cat. 283 .A (again period ofMursilis
II) 10 For the first of these examples an important indication of historical character
supports the argument : in the earlier version Kizzuwatna is still mentjoned as
an independent country, but in the later it is not. Many scholars have already
swelt on this point before, Forrer, Goetze, Gurney and Sommer, but Carruba
was the first to realize its linguistical implications 11 Chart VI may serve to
summarize the development in language between the beginning of the Empire
period and the time of Mursilis II.
Chart VI
Original Versions Revised Editions
a) Gen sing. in -an :
LUG.AL-an (Cat. 275) LUG.AL-wa-asi (Cat. 274)
b) Omission of Poss. pron.
da-ri-ia-as-:Q.a-as-ti-is tar-ri-ia-as-]J.a-as (Cat. 283 .A)
(Cat. 276/2741)
ut-ta-a-ar-se-et (Cat. 275) ud-da-a-ar (Cat. 274)
si-u-ni-mi (Cat. 275) DINGIR-LIM-ni (Cat. 274 12 ; but
elsewhere si-u-ni-mi is preserved in
this text)
c) Elimination of the ace. plur. of the Rel. pron.
ku-i-us (Cat. 283 C) 0 (Cat. 283 .A)
ku-i-us (Cat. 275) 0 (Cat. 274) 1 3
d) Dissolution of the construction Gen. - noun - Poss. pron. 14
[ ...... ut-ne-as :Q.]u-u-ma-an- KUR-e-as :Q.u-u-ma-an-da-as
da-as a-as-su< -sum>-me-et a-as-su (Cat. 283 .A)
(Cat. 283 C)
SA MKan-tu-zi-li ut-ta-a-ar-se- SAL U.Nili.LuU.LU-UT-TI
et (Cat. 275) ud-da-a-ar (Cat. 274)
e) Change/Addition of particles :
[zi-ik-m]u DINGIR-[A [at-ta- zi-ga-mu-za DINGIR-[[(A at-
9 It is still a moot question which is the earlier one, cf. H.G. Giiterbock, JAOS LXXXVIII (1958),
p. 242.
10 I have the distinct impression that Cat. 274 is slightly older than Cat. 283 A which can be accurately
dated to the beginning of Mursilis' reign : in some examples of Chart VI Oat. 274 sides with the older
versions; see also Chapter m, p. 42.
11 See Oarruba, Wisurijanza, p. 46.
12 Of. XXXI 127 + m : 12 as compared to XXX 10 Rev. : 22.
1 3 See XXXI 127 +m: 17-18 as compared to XXX 10 Rev.: 24-25 but note the preservation of
ku-i-us in XXXI 127 + I : 52.
14 See Carruba et alii, Bemerkungen, pp. 14-15.
as i-wa-ar zi-ik] (Cat. 275) ta-a)]s i-wa-ar zi-ik (Cat. 276 !)

zi-ik-pat ge-en-zu-wa-la-as [zi-i]k-pat-za DUTU URU.A-ri-
DUTU-us (Cat. 276/2741) in-na gi-in-zu-wa-la-as
DINGIR-LUM zi-ik (Cat. 283 .A)
ne-pi-s[a-as] tag-na-as-sa ne-pi-sa-as-sa-az tag-na-as-
:Q.u-u-la-le-es-ni zi-ik-pat sa :Q.u-u-la-le-es-ni zi-ik-pat
DUTU-us [la]-lu-ki-ma-as DUTUURU.A-ri-in-na la-lu-uk-
(Cat. 2741) ki-[m]a-as (Cat. 283 .A)
For brevity's sake I omit
four other examples where
Cat. 283 .A adds -za
in-na-ra-u-wa-an-ti-ma-mu in-na-ra-wa-an-ti-mu-kan ..... .
pe-e-dil ...... ma-ni-ja- ... ma-ni-ja[-a:Q.-ta] (Cat.
a:Q.-ta (Cat. 275) 274)
nu-za-an ...... sa-ra-a ... i- nu-za-kan ...... [sa-ra-a] .. .
en-zi (Cat. 283 C) i-ja-an-zi (Cat. 283 .A)
na-pa ...... le-e an-da :Q.ar- na-as-ta ...... le[-e] an-da
kan-zi (Cat. 283 C) :Q.ar-kan-zi (Cat. 283 .A)
[na-a]s-ta ...... sar-ra-as- nu[-kan] ...... sar-re-es-
ki-it[-ta] (Cat. 276 C) ki-si (Cat. 274)
nu-za-ta BA DINGIR-[A du- nu-za-kan [BA] DINGIR-IA
ud-du-mar :Q.a-at-ta-ta :Q.u-u-ma- :Q.a-a [t-ta-tar] :Q.u-u-ma[-an
an-ta sa-ki[-nu]-un (Cat. 275) sa-ki-nu-un] (Cat. 274)
The preceding examples are all advanced as proof that some Hittite texts really
were adapted in style to the more modern usage of the copyist's own days. In
the following Chapter I shall show that other late copies do preserve both the
wording and the spelling of their (hyp)archetype 1 5 In principle, however, three
different "moments" should be carefully distinguished : a) at what time was the
text composed? b) was it during the time of its use slightly modernized or even
drastically revised? c) when was the actual manuscript written down? Some
texts of course never were revised or adapted, being either not important enough
or too sacred. Sometimes the actual manuscript of a revision may have been pres-
erved. In these cases only two correlates remain, either a and o or a and b. Two
examples may be added in order to show why it is of importance to determine
the date of a revision.
Example I : Otten has rightly stressed that copy B for tablet I of the Laws gives
detailed provisions for what should be done in the case of an unilateral annulment
of a marriage after the kusata, the brideprice, had already been handed over,
1s See Chapter ill, p. 55-56.

while copy A (in "Old Script") does not 16 In giving these provisions copy B
confirms to the normal practice of the Ancient Near Eastern legislation, known
e.g. from the code of Hammurapi. It is of importance to add that this important
revision cannot have taken place before the beginning of the Empire period,
because in the following additional paragraph - devoted to the marriage between
a free man and a female slave (par. 31)- the nom. plur. of the Enclitic pronoun
comm. gen. is thrice rendered with -at instead of with -e (exclusively used in all
Old Hi.ttite texts, cf. Chapter I and Chart V). The various manuscripts for tablet I
of the Laws should now be re-assigned to one of these two recensions represented
by A and B respectively and doubtless to another, later revision as well.
Example II : One should reckon with the possibility that one manuscript for a
composition may be a relatively old copy in archaic spelling of a nevertheless
modernized version and another manuscript a late copy - later e.g. than the
change in spelling habits referred to in the beginning of Chapter I - which still
preserves some older readings. It is not necessary at all to give unreserved pre-
ference to the manuscript which is more archaic in spelling than the others. I add
this example, because there is a danger that future scholars may be misled by
the archaic character of the spelling in "Familienzwist", Oat. 321 II A, a manu-
script which has been adduced by both Miss Kammenhuber and Oarruba 1 7
One should not overestimate the value of this copy. Although decidedly late,
copy I A 18 sometimes preserves the older form : it consistently writes -us for
the ace. plur. comm. gen. of the Enclitic pronoun (6 examples) and in II : 33 it
preserves the archaic genitive TlJGse-ek-nu-us, while Oat. 321 II A gives a mix-
ture of -us (2 examples) and -as (8 examples) and gives this genitive as TUGse-
ek-nu-wa-as (Ill : 25). It would be possible to collect more examples of a similar
divergence.
On internal evidence Sommer and Otten decided that the copies of version I do
not belong to a prototype of II A but that they should be considered as abbre-
viated or mutilated compared to that other text 19 We may now add that they
should go back to a relatively old (hyp)archetype and certainly not to copy 321
II A itself. Both texts use kus as a nom. plur. (321 I A II : 1 ku-u-us = 321 II A
II : 47 ku-u-sa). In itself this seems to be a relatively late phenomenon, but one
text of group B offers a parallel (apus in Oat. 354.1).
16 Cf. H. Otten in H. Schmokel, Kulturgeschichte des Alten Orient (Stuttgart, 1961), p. 391 and in
Fischer Weltgeschichte, Die altorientalische Reiche IT, p. 124 with respect to par. 29-31 missing from A.
17 See A. Kammenhuber, ZA LVII N.F. 23 (1965), p. 200 ff. and 0. Carruba, Wisurijanza, pp. 32 and
46.
18 Bin the edition presented by L. (Jakob-)Rost, MIO I {1953), p. 345 ff.
19 See Sommer-Otten, OLZ XLVIII (1953), c. 18.
LINGUISTICAL INTERPRETATION OF TEXTUAL VARIANTS 37
The revision applied to type II and preserved in copy II A antedates the intro-
duction of the "modernized" spelling and the transformation of the gloss sign
into a Luwian marker 20 Apparently the revision was posterior to the change
from -us to -as in the ace. plur. common gender of the Enclitic pronoun (one
example of -us is to be found in the colophon and the other right in the beginning
of the text in 321 II A I : 26). An interchange between -us and -as is typical for
texts stemming from the early decades of the Empire period. The earliest examples
of tablets in which the gloss sign functions as a Luwian marker belong either
to the end of Suppiluliumas' region reign or to the beginning of the period of
Mursilis II 21 Perhaps we may conclude that the composition itself was written
in the beginning of the Empire period and that the above-mentioned revision took
place during the reign of Suppiluliumas or one of his immediate predecessors on
the Hittite throne.
20 See with respect to this characteristic A. Ka=enhuber, ZA LVII N.F. 23 (1965), p. 201.
21 Cf. H.G. Giiterbock, Orientalia XXV (1956), p. 136.
IlL PHILOLOGICAL EVIDENCE
After this necessary digression I now return to the main subject of this study,
the distribution of the Hittite historical texts. It might legitimately be asked
whether there are philological arguments for a reasoned choice between the two
alternatives, I) the texts of group 0 are originals of late date, sometimes with
archaizing features, or 2) the texts of group 0 are from the Middle Hittite period,
partly originals, partly ]ate copies, which have in some instances been adapted
to later scribal habits.
I. If it could be shown that some of these tablets should be considered as late

copies of older (hyp)archetypes rather than as independent originals of the late
period, this would indicate that the compositions in question should preferably
be dated to an earlier age of the Empire period and not to the very last decades.
II. If there is good evidence for a secondary revision of a composition belonging

to this group, because there is a marked contrast between two (groups of) manu-
scripts, this would point in the same direction.
Ill. If some manuscripts of the disputed group should reveal a free variation
between old and new spelling variants, this phenomenon would be open to two
explanations. It could either prove that these copies date from an intermediary
period during which both writings were current, or it could characterize the
manuscripts in question as partially updated copies of a later age.
Ad I:
In one example - Oat. 178.1, a law-text of a ki11g Tudhaliyas -the colophon
indicates that the text is a late copy 1 . Apparently the (hyp)archetype was in a
bad condition : ki-i TUP-PU ar-:Q_a :Q_ar-ra-an e-es-ta. This evidence is of some
importance, since, as was duly noted in Chart II of Chapter I, Oat. 178.1 shows
material similarities to Oat. 179.9 now published as KBo XVI 24 (+) 25, which
1 Of. the names Mahhu(z)zis and Halpazitis mentioned in the colophon. A Mahhuzzis is known
from KBo IV 10 Rev. : 32 and XXVI 43 Rev. : 33 = XXVI 50 Rev. : 27 as a scribe and GALL1J MU-
BAR-RI-I ,Laroche, Noms des Hittites, no. 714.1). Under no. 259.3 Laroche gives references for a
Halpazitis who was a father of scribes (and perhaps also a scribe himself ( ?)).
PHILOLOGICAL EVIDENCE 39
has been declared Middle Hittite on account of its language and the form of its
signs 2
Sometimes there is internal evidence that the tablet in question should not be
taken for an original. In Cat. 88- XXIII 72 Rev. :55/55 a - the scribe at first
omitted a whole sentence from the manuscript he was copying, because his eyes
wandered from a first to a second KAS-si, and later he inserted the missing clause
(55a). A similar correction can be found in Rev. : 32 a. A comparable omission
by homoiosis took place in Cat. 277 A (XVII 21) II : 26 - a composition belonging
to group B -, but here the mistake was not corrected in ancient times. Von
Schuler restored the text on the basis of a duplicate 3
It is hard to pronounce an opinion on Cat. 95 (XXIII 77 +).

As the name of a
king and the normal titles are completely absent, von Schuler concludes that
it might be a draft prepared in the Chancellery. It might also be a kind of abstract,
made afterwards to serve as the basis for another, later treaty. This is not alto-
gether unlikely, since we actually have a presumably later treaty based on this
text, namely Cat. 97.1 (XXVI 19). Von Schuler remarks on the latter: "Zweifel-
haft ist es allerdings, ob es sich hier um einen geltenden Vertrag handelt. Die
zahlreichen Rasuren, der N achtrag einer ganzen Zeile (II : 28) und die sehr un-
gleichmassigen Zeilenlangen (vgl. I ; 6 und II : 14, 15) scheinen, ahnlich wie bei
XXIII 77, eher auf einer Entwurf zu deuten. Allerdings lasst die vierkolumnige
Textanordnung und die in XXIII 77 fehlende Fluchformel vielleicht den Schluss
auf ein fortgeschritteneres Stadium der Abfassung bzw. Niederschrift zu ..... .
Obwohl die zwei Vertrage gewiss nicht unabhangig voneinander entstanden
sind, brauchen sie darum wed er zum gleichen Vertragswerk noch in die gleiche
Zeit zu gehOren; vielmehr scheint XXVI 19 jiinger zu sein" 4
There is in fact some evidence indicating that XXIII 77 +

is not a draft, but
a later abstract. Although the language is rather archaic, in von Schuler's opinion
even more archaic than Cat. 96, the 20 : 0 ratio of EGIR-pa to a-ap-pa writings
indicates that a Hittite scribe from a later period copied an old tablet of an earlier
age and in doing so updated this particular feature of spelling. A few consistently
used late "variants" in XXVI 19 can be adduced in support of a late date for
this tablet : -ten instead of -te-en, -nir instead of -ni-ir, ma-a]J.-]J.a-an instead
of ma-a-a]J.-]J.a-an. But I hasten to add that stray examples of these younger
variants are already present in undoubtedly Middle Hittite copies like XIV 1
2 Of. OLZ XLVIII (1953), c. 1.5 and the Introduction to KBo XVI, p. V.
3 Of. von Schuler, Die Ka.ifldier, p. 156 note 12 with respect to XVII 21 IT : 26.
4 Of. von Schuler, Die Kas7ciier, pp. 132-133.
40 THE RECORDS OF THE EARLY HITTITE EJ\fPIRE
(Cat. 89, the indictment of Madduwattas) and XXXI 103 (Cat. 178.10). Conside-
rable importance can be attached, however, to a drastic syntactic modernization :
u-e-sa su-ma-a-as-pat b.ar-ru-wa-ni (XXIII 77 +
Obv. : 50) has been changed
to u-e-sa su-me-es-pat har-u-e-ni (XXVI 19 II : 23). The use of sumes for the
dative plural is without parallel in earlier Hittite 5
.Ad II :
In a few cases more manuscripts are available for one and the same composition.
It is of interest to note that some indications might point to a difference in age
between the two copies. The rather poorly preserved copy B (XXIII 12) for
Tudhaliyas' annals (Cat. 85) might be older than copy A (XXIII 11) :
B A
a-ap-pa EGIR-pa
b.u-it-ti-i[a-nu-un] SUD-nu-un
i-e-et Ha-at
[wa-a]g-gas-ri-ia-u-ar wa-ag-gas-r1- ~a-u-wa-ar
With respect to Cat. 96 it is not so easy to make a reasoned choice between the
manuscripts A (KBo VIII 35) and B (XXIII 78 +).
Both contain archaic spellings.
In a first group B preserves the more archaic variant :
B A
a-ap-pa EGIR-pa
[li]-in-ga-en li-in-ga-i[n]
[d]a-i-u-e-en da-i-u-en
URUK[a]-a-as-ka URUKa-as-ka
pa-ab.-sa-an-ta-ru pa-ab.-sa-an-da-ru
But there are also variants which seem to serve as a counterpoise

A B
ne-e-pi-sa-as ne-pi-sa-an
tag-na-a-as tag-na[-as]
DINGIR.MES-es (2 x) DINGIR.MES
ne-e-pi-is ne-pi-is
fDJji.A-es fD.MES
is-kar-ra-an-ni-an[-du] [is]-kar-ra-an-ni-ia-an-du
In both copies some constructions seem to have been misunderstood or, less
5 See Carruba, Verbalendungen, p. 85 note c.

probably, deliberately changed 6 These misunderstandings could be explained

on the basis of the assumption that manuscripts A and B are mutually indepen-
dent copies of one (hyp)archetype. Apparently both were made with great care,
preserving both a number of archaic, though not identical spellings. Manuscripts
C and D are rather parallel versions, not duplicates in the formal sense. D (KBo
XVI 29) preserves a few logographic writings missing from the other manus-
scripts : NI-I[B DINGIR.MES] versus li-in-ga-a-us (A, B), EGIR-pa versus
a-ap-pa (A, B) and SAJ;II.A-KU-NU against ki-ir-se-me- et (A), but then suddenly
in D li-in-ki-ia-as DINGIR.ME[S] versus NI-IS DINGIR.MES in A.
N.B. Of the texts assembled under Cat. 97, XXXI 33 (97.3) is too small to warrant
conclusions. XXVI 19 (97.1), clearly based upon Cat. 95 and younger in spelling
and syntax, has already been dealt with. XXVI 20 (97.2) is definitely interesting.
The remains are archaic in spelling 7 XXXI 105 (97.4) preserves a few charac-
teristic, archaic forms : ma-a-a:Q_-:Q_a-an, pa-is-te-en and pi-is-te-en, da-at-te-en.
Some remarks on compositions of group B, the undoubtedly Middle Hittite texts,

may profitably be added at this point. With respect to Cat. 175 there is sound
evidence for the conclusion that B (XXXI 42) is more archaic than especially
A. The numerous -wani endings of copy B have all been duly noted in Chart I
of Chapter I. But there is more .The copy abounds in plene spellings and syllabic
writings : :Q_u-u-li-a-a-as, i-da-a-lu-un (A : ]JUL-lu-un), an-za-a-sa-as (A : an-
za-as-sa and perhaps a mistake for an-za-a-as-sa ~), URUJ]:AR-ra-na-a-as-si, hu-u-
ma-an-te-i-e (A : :Q_u-u-ma-an-ti-ia), ku-u-ru-ra-as (A : ku-ru-ra-as), u-e-ez-zi
(A : u-i-ia-az-zi), i-da-lu-un (A : J]:UL-lu-un), ku-u-ru-ur (A : ku-ru-ur), na-ak-ki-i,
u-e-da-a-u-e-ni (A : u-e-da-u-e[-ni]), pa-an-ga-u-e (A : pa-an-q[a- ... ], see below
p. 51) 8
Concerning the manuscripts for Cat. 277 - Arnuwandas' prayer about the cults
in the north- it may be remarked that copy B II: 7 and 10-11 is more complete
than A II : 23 and 26. B also preserves two archaic spellings which have been
modernized in A, ke-e-ta-as (A : ke-e-da-as) and su-up-pa-e-es-sa-az (against
su-up-pa-e-sa-za in A). The numerous manuscripts for this composition should
be studied anew once all the inedita have been published. At the moment it is
hard to decide whether B really is older than A, or whether B was made with
greater care.
Concerning the prayers to the Sun-god, Cat. 274-276, Giiterbock's article, The
s See in a series of accusatives suddenly A II : 9 DKAL-as, A II : 10 li-in-ki-as is-ba-a-as ( = B II :

6 li-in-ki-ia is-na-a-as).
7 Of. a-u-wa-r [e-...] with the long form of the stem, u-e-ez-zi, da-a-i-e? [-er].
8 See already Oarruba, Verbaldungen, p. 85 note a ("altere (Archiv)kopie").
Composition of Hittite Prayers to the Sun, is of fundamental importance. Giiter-

bock rightly suggested that Cat. 27 4 C and B (+) D should be transposed to Cat.
276. These texts may be added to this composition as a third and fourth copy
C and D. It is beyond doubt that both Cat. 275, Kantuzzilis' prayer, and Cat.
276, the prayer of an unnamed Hittite king, are linguistically older than Cat. 274 9
However, XXX 10, the tablet on which Cat, 275 is preserved, shows a striking
mixture of "free" spelling variants and this may indicate that the tableb itself
is not as old as the text (see below, p. 49). On a few points XXXI 127 (the +
main copy for Cat. 274) maintains an older spelling than XXX 10 10 . This precludes
that Cat. 274 depends on the copy XXX 10, but Cat. 274 could of course very
well be a modernization of XXX 10's (hyp)archetype.
The spelling ma-a-a}J.-}J.a-an in XXXVI 75 (Cat. 276 A) proves that the original-
not necessarily this copy itself- goes back to the beginning of the Empire period 11
The same holds good for Cat. 275, not only because of an example of this same
characteristic spelling but also for prosopographical reasons. The decision in the
moot question which of these two compositions was written before the other can
therefore hardly be based upon linguistical considerations. Readings both texts
and comparing Cat. 274 for the missing beginning of Cat. 275 one gets the im-
pression, however, that already from the very first lines Cat. 276 consists of a
purposeful adaptation of the parallel text for royal use by a Hittite king.
Cat. 283 C (XXIV 4 +

XXX 12) is highly archaic in its spelling and abounds
in plene writings and sequences of the CV1-V1C type instead of signs with the
value eve : u-wa-a-at-te-ni, us-ka-at-te-ni, me-e-ma-1i, ta-ma-a-as-ta, ku-u-r[u-r]
a-an-za, ka-a-as-ta-an, tar-na-at-te-en, la-a-at-te-en, to mention just a few.
But glide vowels already occur just as in the indictment of Madduwattas (Cat.
89), cf. URUAr-za-u-wa (2 x), i-da-a-la-u-wa-an-ni and [w]a-al-}J.a-an-ni-u-wa-an.
But now it is time to return to the texts of group C, the disputed group of possibly
Middle Hittite texts. It is significant, I think, that in two cases - Cat. 171.3
(XXVI 17) as compared to Cat. 170 (the main copy A is XIII 20) and Cat. 176
manuscripts E, L, M ann N as compared to the main copy A, XIII 2 - an appar-
ently older version has been considerably changed and adapted. In both cases
9 See Chapter ll, Chart VI.

10 Cf. XXXI 127 + ll : 20, 21 where forms without glide vowel (in-na-ra-wa-an-ti- ... and i-ia-wa-ar)
should be compared to forms with glide vowel in XXX 10 Obv.: 8 (in-na-ra-u-wa-an-ti-... and i-ia-u-wa);
see also XXXI 127 + ill: 2, a-pa-a[-as] (also XXX ll Rev. : 12 = Cat. 276), as compared to QA-
T AM-MA in XXX 10 Rev. : 16.
11 Cf. already Carruba, Wisurijanza, p. 32.
modern editors have rightly hesitated to use the older version as a normal duplicate.
Cat. 171.3 (manuscript E in Alp's notation for the Military Instructions of the
Hittite king Tuilhaliyas IV (m has been characterized as a free duplicate or as
a parallel text with a different disposition 12 Cat. 176 M has been called a different
version : "Es scheint aber doch, als seien A und M verschiedene Fassungen des
Textes ... " 13
For both compositions the second criterion mentioned in the beginning of this
Chapter is clearly valid : there is ample evidence for a major revision of the
wording used in these compositions. First I shall compare Cat. 171.3 to Cat. 170 :
Cat. 171.3 Cat. 170

ma-a-an DUTU-SI-ma nu ma-a-an DUTU-SI
The sequence nu ma-a-an is rarely used in Old Hittite 14 ; therefore Cat. 171.3
is more archaic on this point.
e-es-tu e-es-du
ma-a-a:Q_-:Q_a-an ma-a:Q.-:Q.a-an
nu ku-is EREM.MES a-sa-an-du- nu ku-is EREMJVIES a-sa-an-du-la-
la< -as> na-as-kan an-da a-sa- as na-an-kan DUT[U-Sl] a-sa-an-du-
an-du-la-as da-a-la-a:Q_-:g_i li an-da ta-la-a:Q_-:g_i
Adverb +verb tends to develop into a compound ("univerbation of the adverb,
hence preverb ).
ku-wa-at-ka ku-wa-at-qa (see below, p. 52)
ma-a-a:Q_-:Q_a-an ma-a:Q_-:Q_a-an.
In another passage of Cat. 171.3 (without later parallel) na-[a]s-ta-se-ia and

nu-us-se-es-sa-an pu-u-nu-su[-wa-ar? e-es-tu ?] both preserve -se, the archaic
dat. sing. of the Enclitic pers. pron. 3rd pers. In the first example the word order
is striking, with -asta not in the last position as it should be (cf. the usual nu-
us-si-is-ta) 15 Cat. 36.2 B (VIII 81) - a fragment which in my opinion belongs
12 Goetze characterizes the text in his Introduction to KUB XXVI as follows : "erganzendes, wenn
auch etwas freies Duplikat". Alp considers it to be a "parallel text with a different disposition "(In-
struction.s, p. 403).
13 See von Schuler, Hethitische Dienstanweisungen, p. 36.
14 Cf. Sternemann, MIO XI (1966), pp. 396, 397, 399. ~.
1 5 Apparently the position of -se was unstable, see also Tablet I of the Laws, par. 95, se-e-er-si-it-wa
(A) I se-er-wa-as-si (B) I [se]-er-se-wa (P) sar-ni-ik-mi. One may also refer to Tablet II of the Laws,
par. 10, an-da-se-ia a-pe-e-ni-is-su-wa-an pa-a-i (B) in contrast to Q for par. 25 where one finds an-ta-
ia-as-se in the same expression.
to Cat. 94 and group C - offers a good parallel for the second example : (gloss
sign) sa-a-ku-wa-as-se-es-sa-an l;)_ar-du (II : 10) 16.
With respect to Cat. 176 - the instructions for the Commander of the Border
Guards - the situation is more complicated. A few preliminary remarks on a
number of manuscripts must precede the comparison between the two versions.
The newly published piece XL 55 belonging to this composition is of considerable
interest. According to the Introduction to this KUB-volume, XL 55 belongs
to column I of XL 56 (manuscript L in von Schuler's notation), although there
is no direct join between the two pieces. XL 55 (siglum L1 might be used in contrast
to L2 for XL 56) preserves two undoubtedly archaic spellings, ma-a-al;)_-l;)_a-an
in line 4 and se-e-b1n-na in line 8. This indicates that manuscript L (L1 L2) +
belongs to an old recension. So far it has escaped attention that E2 (XXXI 88)
III can be joined to L2 III (third column and not second as given by Klengel,
the editor). Already some time ago Laroche concluded that E1 (XXXI 87) joins
to E2 (XXXI 88), cf. Laroche, RHA fasc. 49 (1948-49), p. ll, fasc. 59 (1956),
p. 90, and fasc. 61 (1957), p. 126. I have asked Professor Giiterbock for his opinion
on these matters and he replied that he accepts both Laroche's join E1 E2 +
(he had in fact surmised the same) and mine, L2 +
E2, and then he continues :
"Further, if you look at the shape of XXXI 87 and XL 56 you see that they
have the same shape in outline, mirrorlike. In other words they belong dos-a-dos.
This agrees well with the individual two joins" (personal letter of Dec. 21, 1968).
Carruba already saw that M (XIII I) preserves the archaic spelling ma-a-al;)_-l;)_a-
an 17. Where N overlaps M, there are slight variations. N might be a third old
manuscript but could also be a later copy of a slightly different archaic version.
So far there is simply not enough evidence to decide whether K (I and II) and
D1 belong to the old or to the new recension. The place with the older one assigned
to them by von Schuler is based upon similarity in content matter, but not on
linguistic considerations. Tentatively and awaiting further study, one might
say that there are three manuscripts which seem to belong to a more archaic
recension : M, N and E1,2 +
L1, 2.
16 Perhaps the gloss sign in front of sa-a-kuwa-as-se-es-sa-an ftmctions as an exclamation mark, cf.
Giiterbock, Orientalia XXV (1956), p. 136. In Chapter I, Chart I, I have quoted the correspondencies
which might show that Cat. 36.2 B should in fact be reckoned to group C. Bibliographical references
for both Cat. 36.2 B and 94 have been given above on p. 5 note 17. Diagrams 6 and 12 (see below)
confirm that Cat. 94 preserves some archaic spellings. The precise relationship between both fragments
will be discussed below p. 60 note 20. But see Ka=enhuber, Arier, pp. 37, 43 note 103, 65, 98 note
298, and 99 for a different opinion. Miss Ka=enhuber denies the existence of a first and early Sunas-
suras and dates both fragments to the time of Suppiluliumas I .
17 Cf. Carruba, Wisurifanza, p. 32.
Archaic Recension Main Version (.A etc.)

ma-a-a:Q.-:Q.a-an (L1) [m]a-a:Q.-:Q.a-an
se-e-kan-na (L1 and E1) se-kan-na
si-ia-a-an (E1) si-ia-an
a-ar-ri-ra-an[-du](E1) ar-ri-ir-ra-an-du
ne-e-u-wa-a:Q.-:Q.a-an-du (E1) ne-wa-a:Q.-:Q.a-an-du
Eka-ru-u-um-mi (E2) Eka-ri-im-mi
ar-ta:Q.-:Q.i-e-es (E2) a-ar-ta-:Q.i-us
[k]u-e-da-ni A-NA TUL SISKUR. nu-us-sa-an A-NA TUL SISKUR.
SISKUR e-es-zi na-at si-pa-an- SISKUR ki-it-ta-ri na-at-si
za-kan-du [sa]-ra-a-ia-at-kan e-es-sa-an-du ar-as-kan-du
a-ar-as-kan-du (L2 +
E2)
a-ar-as-kan-du (L2 +
E2) ar-as-kan-du
ku-e-da-ni URU-ri ku-wa-as[-ki- ku-e-da-ni-as-kan URU-ri ku-as-
ir] (L2) ki-ir (addition of -kan)
:Q.al-ku-e-es-na-as-sa (M) :Q.al-ku-is-sa-na-sa
ki-i-nu-an (M) ki-nu-wa-an
ma-a-an-kan (M) na-as-ma-kan
ge-e-mi-ia-as-sa-an (M) gi-im-mi-ia-as-sa-[a]n
.And as variants in a more general sense (without direct correspondence) :
ma-a-a:Q.-:Q.a-an (M) ma-a:Q.-:Q.a-an
but note GIM-an in N, D1 and K II
du-wa-a-anfdu-wa-an tu-u-wa
Ad Ill
In both examples which have just been dealt with, the older version consistently
writes ma-a-a:Q.-:Q.a-an versus ma-a:Q.-:Q.a-an in the later adaptation. On the basis
of partly identical and partly different material the same clue has been followed
up by Miss Kammenhuber 18 and Carruba 19, both paying much attention to
version II .A of the "Familienzwist". This philological criterion for the recognition
of Middle Hittite texts does not stand alone : a-ap-pa, a-ap-pa-an and na-at-ta
function in a similar manner, as they are also typical for tablets in "Old Script",
cf. Diagram 41 9a. In this Diagram and the others given in this Chapter asterisks
have been used to denote that the later variants are entirely lacking.
18 Of. Kammenhuber, ZA LVII N.F. 23 (1965), p. 201, Altkleinasiatische Sprachen, p. 176.

19 Of. Oarruba, Wisurijanza, pp. 31-32 together with note 51 : this listing is very important indeed.
19a Of. Kammenhuber, Bibliotheca Orientalis XVIII (1961), p. 79.
Diagram 4
"Old Script"
a-ap-pa: Oat. 5 A*; 7*; 156.3*; 181 A*; 184 Q*; 308 0*; 324*; KBoXIII 175*
a-ap-pa-an: Oat. 5 A*; 7*; 181 A*; 324*
ma-a-a:!J.-:!J.a-an: Oat. 122.6*; (cf. ma-a-a:!J_-:!J.a-an-da .in 181 A*); 289*
na-at-ta: 5 A*; 7*; 24 D*; 122.6*; 181 A*; 184 Q*; 324*.
One important question has been overlooked so far : what should be thought
about those texts which show an intermixture of both variants, ma-a-a:!J_-:!J.a-an
as well as ma-a:!J_-:!J.a-an and, on a par, a-ap-pa/EGIR-pa, a-ap-pa-anjEGIR(-pa)-
an, na-at-tajU-UL. Diagrams 51-12 may serve to give an adequate impression
of how these "free variants" are divided over the texts of groups B and 0.
Diagram 5
B a-ap-pa EGIR-pa
KBo XV 10 0 12
KBo XVI 47 1 1
Oat. 178.10* 1 0
Oat. 179.1-5, 7-8* 2 0
Oat. 179.6 0 3
Oat. 179.9 0 1
Oat. 275 6 1
Oat. 276 4 2
Oat. 277 0 4
Oat. 283 0* 1 0
Diagram 6
0
Oat. 85.2 1 (B) 3 (A)
Oat. 88 6 1
Oat. 89 15 4
Oat. 94 (XXXVI 127) * 4 0
Oat. 95 0 20
Oat. 96 (A/B) 5 + 1 (B) 2 (A)
Oat. 124.6 0 2
Oat. 172 1 2
Oat. 176 E + L, M, N 0 1, 2, 0
Diagram 7
B a-ap-pa-an EGIR(-pa)-an
KBo XV 10 0 1
Cat. 175 B 0 2
Cat. 178.10 0 1
Cat. 179.1-5, 7-8 1 0
Cat. 179.9 0 3
Cat. 277 0 7
Diagram 8
c
Cat. 85.2 0 4
Cat. 86 1 1
Cat. 87 0 2
Cat. 88 0 5
Cat. 89 0 8
Cat. 95 0 3
Cat. 172 0 1
Cat. 176 E + L, M, N 0 3, 5, 0
Cat. 178.1 0 2
Diagram 9
B ma-a-a:Q_-:Q_a-an ma-a:Q_-:Q_a-an GIM-an

KBo XV 10* 4 0 0
KBo XVI 47* 1 0 0
Cat. 179.1-5, 7-8 0 1 0
Cat. 275 1 1 0
Cat. 276 4 (A*) 2 (B) 0
Cat. 277 2 1 ( ~) 0
Diagram 10
c
Cat. 85.2 0 0 2(A)
Cat. 88 1 3 0
Cat. 89 0 9 2
Cat. 95* 3 0 0
Cat. 171.3* 2 0 0
Cat. 176 E + L*, M*, N 1,5,0 0,0,0, 0,0,1
Diagram 11
B na-at-ta U-UL
KBo XV 10 0 2
KBo XVI 31 0 3
KBo XVI 46 0 1
KBo XVI 47 0 1
Cat. 175 B 0 7
Oat. 178.10 0 1
Cat. 179.1-5, 7-8 2 1
Cat. 179.6 0 4
Cat. 179.9 1 10
Cat. 275 10 10
Cat. 276 1 (? B) 8
Cat. 277 0 19
Cat. 283 C 0 2
Diagram 13
0
KBo XVI 50 0 1
Cat. 86 0 1
Cat. 87 0 1
Cat. 88 0 15
Cat. 89 0 L9
Cat. 94 (XXXVI 127) 1 10
Oat. 95 0 9
Cat. 96 (.A/B) 0 3
Cat. 99 0 2
Cat. 124.6* 2 0
Oat. 172 0 10
Cat. 176 E + L, M, N 0 2, 0, 1
Cat. 178.1 1 1
Some of the tablets belonging to group B have been vaguely described as written
in what may appear to be a "Middle Hittite ductus". These are : in general the
texts belonging to Oat. 179, among which the recently published KBo XVI 24
( +) 25 (Cat. 179.9) is of primary importance on account of its length and state
of preservation, and now also KBo XVI 27 (Oat. 179.6), 31, 45, 46 and 47. To
2 Of. So=er-Otten, OLZ XLVIII (1953), c. 15, and now the Introduction to KBo XVI, p. V.
21 See for this group especially Kammenhuber, Z.A. LVII N.F. 23 (1965), p. 179 note 13.
these may be added XXXI 103 (Cat. 178.10), a communication I owe to Professor
Giiterbock (personal letter of .August 17, 1968). In these tablets the older variants
do occur, but they are not exclusively used, cf. Diagram 13.
This is why I am inclined to think that this variation may prove to be typical
for tablets of precisely this period, in the same way as the interchange between
-asta and -kan referred to in Chapter I. But it would also be possible to assume
that later copyists sometimes introduced the examples of ma-a:tJ.-b.a-an, EGIR-pa,
EGIR(-pa)-an and U-UL into their copies. This solution might apply to those
tablets which are not written in "Middle Script" . .Awaiting further study which
tablets are written in this type of script and wich are not, one might suggest
that especially when the variation applies to more than one item there is a chance
that a later copyist should be held responsible for this free variation. This might
be valid for XXX 10 (Cat. 275) with a variation ma-a-a:tJ.-b.a-anjma-a:tJ.-b.a-an
but also with an interchange a-ap-pafEGIR-pa and na-at-tajU-UL. Perhaps we
may look for an indication in the fact that copy B for Tablet I of the Laws main-
tains a certain proportion of older spelling variants 22 and that sometimes a syn-
tactical variant is maintained as well 23 This probably indicates that the moder-
nization took place as a gradual adaptation to a more modern usage and not
as a methodical, thorough reworking of the original by a single scribe. It pro-
bably carried weight whether the (hyp)archetype was dictated or read by the
scribe himself, cf. XXIX 1 as compared to XVII 10 and KBo XV 10 24
The change from a-ap-pa, a-ap-pa-an, ma(-a)-a:tJ.-b.a-an and na-at-ta to the later
variants EGIR-pa, EGIR(-pa)-an, GIM-an and U-UL is in fact the outcome
of a more general tendency to replace syllabic writings by their logographic
variants. This is one aspect of what has justly been called a change in spelling
habits . .A second characteristic difference between texts in "Old" and "Middle"
script on the one hand and those of later periods on the other consists in a growing
preference for signs of the type CVC over sequences CV1-V1C. Let me give one
example: nowhere in "Old Script" and very rarely in those texts written in what
might prove to be the "Middle Hittite ductus" is the sign TIN used in final position
to designate the 2nd person plural of the preterite/imperative : almost every-
where one finds -te-en (cf. Diagrams 13, 14 (B) and 15 (C)). Less cogent but equally
interesting is a study of the uses of NIR, SIR and TIR for the 3rd person plural
preterite of verbs ending in-n, -sor-t. NIR, SIR and TIR are, as far as I know,
22 Cf. the retention of -se in par. 11, 23, 28 A and 95; na-at-ta has been preserved in par. 27 and 71.
23 Cf. the construction Gen.- noun- Poss. pron. preserved in par. 9 ( ?), 15, 17, 18, 95 and 99 ( ?) ;
see also Chart ill of Chapter II.
24 See the end of this Chapter.
Diagram
"Middle Script" a-ap-pa EGIR-pa a-ap-pa-an EGIR(-pa)-an

Cat. 179.1-5,7-8 2 0 1 0
Cat. 179.6 0 3 0 0
Cat. 179.9 0 1 0 3
KBo XVI 31 0 0 0 0
46 0 0 0 0
47 1 1 0 0
Cat. 178.10 1 0 0 1
4 5 1 4
non-existent in such a position in "Old Script", but in texts from the beginning
of the Empire period there is a mixture of e.g. ku-in-ni-ir (Cat. 85), ku-e-ni-ir
(Cat. 179.1) and ku-e-nir (Cat. 88, 89). In Cat. 179.9 e-sir already occurs, while
Cat. 283 C still writes e-se-er (in 283 A this form has been misunderstood and
changed to e-es-sir !) However, these examples are less valid, since PIR and KIR
were already in use during the period of "Old Script" to write the corresponding
verbal forms of verbs ending in -p and -k. Furthermore, the same variation still
occurs in texts from the period of Mursilis, cf. [ku-e]n-ni-ir and [k] u-en-nir in
Cat. 279.1.
Diagram 14
B -te-en -ten
KBo XV 10* 10 0
Cat. 178.10 0 2
Cat. 179.1-5, 7-8* 2 (-te-in) 0
Cat. 179.6* 4 0
Cat. 179.9* 8 0
Cat. 277* 1 0
Cat. 283 C* 4 0
PIDLOLOGICAL EVIDENCE 51
13
na-at-ta U-UL ma(-a)-a]J-]Ja-an ma-a]J-]Ja-an -te-en -ten

2 1 0 1 2 (-te-in) 0
0 4 0 0 4 0
1 10 0 0 8 0
0 3 0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0 0 0
0 1 1 0 0 0
0 1 0 0 0 2
3 21 1 1 14 2
Diagram 15
c -te-en -ten
Cat. 87 3 4
Cat. 88 0 14
Cat. 89 3 5
Cat. 95 11 4
Cat. 96 (A/B)* 2 0
Cat. 99 0 9
Cat. 172 0 2
A third characteristic is the remarkable habit to use the sign QA for ka4 and
gas. Already a long time ago Goetze devoted an excursus to the use of QA in the
Hittite syllabary 2 5. He justly notes that it was in fact superfluous and that
there are no traces of a corresponding use of QI and QU. He goes on : "Weiter
ist auch die Partikel -ka/-ki heranzuziehen, die das Indefinitum bildet. Bekannt-
lich lautet die Partikel -ka iiberall dort, wo ilie letzte Silbe des zugrundeliegenden
Relative nicht den Vokal i enthalt. Geschrieben wird -qa oder -ga ; das Zeichen
ka ist beim Indefinitum niemals zu find en". Goetze' s data clearly show that
1) QA very rarely occurs in the beginning of a word. 2) it is often to be found
in free variation with GA within a word, and 3) it interchanges with KI and KU.
Goetze rightly concluded that QA should often be transcribed as ka4.
A few additional remarks may now be added: a) KA does occur in "Old Script"
25 See A. Goetze, AM, pp. 267274.

in positions with the indefinite pronoun and its related adverbs where according
to Goetze's rule it should not : ku-wa-a-at-ka (Cat. 122.6) and ku-e-el-ka (copy
A for Tablet I of the Laws, par. 44 b); see also ku-wa-at-ka in 171.3 as quoted
above; b) QA is completely absent in "Old Script" as far as Hittite words are
concerned (no initial QA, not after a consonant or vowel in the middle of a word,
no example of double .Q-QA); c) beginning in the time of Tudhaliyas II QA
often occurs in tablets from the first decades of the Empire period. KBo XV 10
(a faithful copy of an older (hyp)archetype, itself not in "Middle Script", see
below) even presents examples where it stands in initial position : ka4-lu-lu-pu-us
(I : 6) and ka4-a-sa (passim in this text). The use of QA in the ethnical name
Gasga was first discussed by Goetze, AM, pp. 205-206. Von Schuler assembled
the occurrences in his paragraph on the name the Gasgaeans 26 : see e.g. in "Middle
Hittite ductus" Cat. 179.6 II: 5 URUKa 4-as-ga (also to be found in II: 8, 9 (URU
Ka4-<as- > ka4 !), 13; see also in the same text MSa-a-us-k[a~ ...] in III : 14.
But it should be added that even in this text the name of the Gasgaeans is not
exclusively written with initial QA.
The increasing use of CVC signs as well as a more frequent use of logograms
may also be found elsewhere in those regions where cuneiform was written during
the second millennium. In his description of the Middle Babylonian syllabary
Jucquois remarks : "Contrairement a l'usage v.B., les signes du type C+ V +C
sont employes assez frequemment, meme en dehors des finales, sans pour autant
que le timbre de la voyelle mediane soit toujours assure" 27 Describing the Hur-
rian syllabary Jucquois points out : "Ainsi il y a frequemment confusion, dans
la graphie, entre sonores, sourdes et emphatiques, par example le signe Labat
62 qui avait en v.B. la valeur qa, reyoit dans ces regions les valeurs ka4 et gas
en surplus" 2 8. Could it be possible that especially this last phenomenon in the
Hittite field was prompted by the important influence of southerly Hurro-Luwian
elements during the early decades of the Empire period ?
My impression is that these new habits made themselves initially felt during
the reign of Tudhaliyas II and that they spread under his eo-regent and successor
Arnuwandas I, to whose reign many texts belonging to group C seem to belong
(cf. -ten in Cat. 87, 88, 89 and 99). I am therefore not so sure that Miss Kammen-
huber's dating of the change in spelling habits to the reign of Mursilis II will
26 Cf. von Schuler, Die Ka8kaer, p. 84 ff.

27 G. Jucquois, Phonetique comparee des Dialectes moyen-babyloniens du Nord et de Z'Ouest, Louvain,
1966, p. 60; see also E. Reiner, A Linguistic Analysis of Akkadian, Den Haag, 1966, par. 2.3 on pp. 29-30.
28 See G. Jucquois, ibidem, p. 61.
stand the test of a more detailed criticism 2 9 .Apparently the changes in the syl-
labary, e.g. the use of Q.A, preceded the more frequent application of logograms and
OVO signs. These, in their turn, led to a sharp decrease in the use of plene writings
in order to denote stress. The texts belonging to the reign of .Arnuwandas present
us with an intermediary stage : logogmphic writings and ova
signs already are
winning in importance, but the plene writings meant to denote stress are still fully
present. If the new dating for the texts of group C should prove to be correct,
the borderline between both spellings would move slightly upwards and the
changes would thus have taken place between the early decennia of the Empire
period and the end of Suppiluliumas' reign. Perhaps I may recall here that the
linguistic evidence as presented at the end of the preceding Chapter seems to
point to precisely the same period, i.e. after the time during which -us inter-
changes with -as to express the ace. plur. comm. gen. of the Enclitic pronoun
(the early decennia of the Empire) but before the gloss sign is used as a Luwian
marker (the end of Suppiluliumas' reign or the beginning of the period of Mur-
silis II).
Of course it should be acknowledged that again we are faced by a dilemna : is

the free variation of e.g. -te-enf-ten typical for the tablets of an intermediary
period, or were the examples of -ten introduced by later copyists~ I must confess
that my initial impression was that the latter had been the case, but fortunately
this is precluded by the fact that at least one text in "Middle Hittite ductus"
preserves the writing -ten 30 One might also point to Cat. 89, the indictment
of Madduwattas, where the erasure in Rev. : 86-87 makes it virtually certain
that we are dealing with an original or, perhaps, a draft, but not with a later
copy : in this text -te-en and -ten are both to be found. There where we are indeed
certain that a text of Tudhaliyas II was copied during the second half of the
13th century B.C., we only find -ten (Cat. 172 II : 8 and 9).
Fortunately there happens to be one composition which gives a very adequate

impression of what happened when an Old Hittite text was copied during the
second half of the 13th century B.C. 31 This is the "Ritual for the Erection of a
29 Of. ZA LVII N.F. 23 (1965), p. 179 note 13 : "Als .Archaisch (jetzt .Archaisch-Jungheth.) werden
hier Texte in einer altertiimlicheren, weniger mit S=erogrammen und Akkadogrammen durchsetzten
Graphik zusammengefasst, die sich deutlich von der uns gelaufigen jungh. Graphik, als deren Urheber
vielleicht Mursilis IL in der zweiten Halfte des 14. Jhd's v. Ohr. anzusehen ist, unterscheidet".
30
According to Professor Giiterbock XXXI 103 is written in "Middle Hittite ductus" (see above,
p. 49) and this tablet (Oat. 178.10) preserves the writing -ten in lines 13 and 19.
31 See already A. Kammenhuber, ZA LVII N.F. 23 (1965), p. 195 ff. and 0. Oarruba, Verbalendungen,
p. 88.
THE RECORDS OF THE EARLY HITTITE EMPIRE
New Palace", Oat. 308, edited by B. Schwartz s2 and translated by Goetze, 3 3

while important passages were dealt with by Giiterbock 3 4 The colophon of XXIX
1 (Oat. 308 A) mentions Pikkus as the scribe who wrote this copy and adds that
it was written "in the presence of" or "under dication from" ( ~) Anuwanza,
the well-known archivist of the period of Tudhaliyas IV 35. Already Ehelolf
commented on the archaic character of copy 0, XXIX 3, in his introductory
remarks to that KUB-volume. Professor Giiterbock has been so kind as to look
at that tablet and he confirms that it is indeed written in "Old Script" (personal
communication during the summer of 1967). It is likely that copies A and B
(XXIX 1 and 2 respectively) were copied from 0.
A few indications suggest that Pikkus' copy has indeed been dictated: 1) omission
of syllables in u-e-se-ia-at-ta< -at> (I : 33), nu-us-ma< -as>-sa-an and l:J_u-
u-uk-ke< -es>-kan-zi (I : 42), u-e< -re>-et-ma-an-si-kan (II : 19 in contrast
to u-e-ri-ti-ma-an in II : 34), ma-ni-i:g_-l:J_i! < -ir> (II : 49); 2) omission of clauses
in I : 26-27 as compared to 0 I : 7-8; 3) signs left unfinished in ma-al-diLia-an-zi
(II : 8), ma-ni-i:g_-l:J-il< -ir> (II : 49) and perhaps in na-al:J_-sa-ra-at-ta-an? (II: 50);
4) repetition of a word (in IV : 16 kat-ta(-ma) is repeated from IV : 15; it should
have been sa-ra-a-ma).
Copy B omits a syllable in [li]-li-is-ki-it< -ten> (II : 10). In B II : 6 we find GIS-

ZU instead of GISMA (A II : 14). Apparently B's scribe, or the man who dictated
to him, misread the (hyp)archetype 0 ( ~), which is unfortunately not preserved
for this passage. The man who dictated Pikkus (Anuwanza ( m
evaded this
pitfall! The second mistake does not preclude dictation, since we know for certain
that in Hattusas, just like in the places of origin for some Amarna letters, the
Akkadograms and the Sumerograms themselves were dictated and not their
Hittite values. The best example to prove this point is XIV 13 I: 51 (Oat. 269.4)
where L U.MES DINGIR.MES EN.MES clearly is a mistake for su-me-es DINGIR.
MES EN.MES 3 6 But it is clear from this second mistake that both texts were
not copied at the same time and dictated by the same man.
It is interesting to see that Pikkus changed a-ap-pa to EGIR-pa, nu-mu-uz to

nu-mu-za, D:ijal-ma-as-su-i-iz to GISDAG-iz, ne-e-pi-sa-as to ne-pi-sa-as. He
consistently writes ma-al:J_-l:J_a-an, EGIR-pa and U-UL. There is a characteristic
variation between -te-en and -ten, and e.g. between da-a-at-tenfda-at-ten (II
32 B. Schwartz, Orientalia XVI (1947), pp. 23-55.

33 A. Goetze, ANETl, pp. 357-358.
34 H G Giiterbock, RHA fasc 43 (1942-1943), pp 102-109.
35 Cf. E. Laroche, ArchOr XVII2 (1949), p. 10 and now also Noms des Hittites, no. 92.
36 See A. Goetze, KIF I, p. 246 together with note 3 printed on p. 244.
20 and 18 ff.), su-u-ur-ku-usfsur-ku-us (IV : 14, 16). He preserves one example

of -se instead of -si for the dat. sing. of the Enclitic pers. pronoun 3rd person
(mi-hu-un-ta-tar-se-kan in II : 36). The main conclusion to be drawn from this
late copy is, in my opinion, that in this case dictation did lead to many moder-
nizations, cf. Diagram 16.
Diagram 16
EGIR-pa: 15 U-UL: 4
EGIR-an: 1 -te-en : 3
ma-alJ.-ha-an : 5 -ten: 14
Perhaps I may add a final remark on two texts which were not dictated. In the
preceding Chapter I have argued that the mythological interpolations of XVII
10, Oat. 258 I A, the main version of the Telibinus Myth, go back to the Old
Hittite period. The surrounding parts belonging to the mugawar, the supplication,
might be considerably younger, however. It is true that one consistently finds
ma-a-alJ.-ha-an throughout the whole composition. This indicates that the entire
text cannot have been composed after the beginning of the Empire period. Other
indications favour precisely that era. The tablet shows a gloss sign before wa-ar-
ku-us-sa-an in Ill : 12 and omits one before tu-u-ma-an-ti-ia-as in IV : 33. In
front of the latter there should have been a Luwian marker, if this word really
is the Luwian counterpart of Hittite istamassuwar 37 It is hard to choose between
two possibilities. First, the gloss sign fulfils the function of an exclamation mark
in order to draw attention to the unusual form wa-ar-ku-us-sa-an instead of
wa-ar-ku-is-sa-an, as we find in the Storm-god version (XXXIII 28 Ill : 6 =
Laroche, Mythologie anatolienne, p. 117); in this case the tablet dates from the
period before the end of Suppiluliumas' reign or the beginning of the period
of Mursilis II 38 Secondly, it is one of those tablets written by a scribe who was
not too sure whether he should use a Luwian marker or not 3 9
In view of the fact that US instead of IS is a mistake of the same type as J;[U
instead of RI (see below), I prefer the first solution. This might be a passage
where the scribe himself recognized the inadequacy of his (hyp)archetype. The
presence then of a Luwian form without a marker (tumantiya-) might imply
that the ritual, in which the mythological parts are embedded, dates from the
37 See E Laroche, DLL, p. 99.

38 See H.G. Giiterbock, Orientalia XXV (1956), p. 136.
39 Cf. the passages collected by Giiterbock, I.e., pp. 131-134. Presumably these scribes were Luwian
themselves.
beginning of the Empire period, because there is more evidence for an important
Luwian impact on the rituals of that period 4o.
But anyhow, whether the actual tablet was written before or after the change
of function for the gloss sign came about, the mistakes of the scribe clearly show
that he experienced considerable difficulties in the reading of his (hyp)archetype
and that he felt obliged to copy only what he could make out 41 :
I : 34 (lj:U instead of RI) ka-ri!-i-e-et
I : 38 (a sequence of lj:I-ME instead of U-WA) [par]-ta-u!-wa!-as-se-et
II : 14 (lj:U instead of TAL) tal!-li-i-e-ed [-du]
II : 29 (PA instead of PAR) pa-ap-par!-as-sa-an-ta
Ill : 26 (ME instead of SI) ar-si!-e-ez-zi
IV : 3 (TI instead of lj:U-U) ]J_u!-u!-it-ti.
It seems likely that this copy was not dictated, and this example should warn
us, I think, that there is no guarantee whatsoever that spellings like ma-a-a:Q_-]J_a-an
- even when consistently used - are only likely to occur in old manuscripts.
Apparently some copyists did try to maintain old-fashioned spellings in their
copies. A second example is KBo XV 10, a ritual mentioning Tudhaliyas II and
Nikalmati. Again we find ma-a-a]J_-]J_a-an consistently used. Still there can be
no doubt that the tablet constitutes a later copy, not only because of its script
as described in the Introduction to this KBo-volume, but also since the copyist
himself draws attention to an erasure in his (hyp)archetype, cf. ]J_a]J_ra in KBo
XV 10 I : 28 referring to an obliterated word in the preceding line.
40 See Chapter IV, p. 74 together with note ll7.

41All the mistakes of the following enumeration have been corrected in Laroche's transliteration,
Mythologie anatolienne, p. 89 ff.
IV. HISTORICAL CONSIDERATIONS
Historical considerations have necessarily been the main criterion used so far
for the dating of Hittite historical texts. In the last resort the dating of an histor-
ical composition can only be based upon a direct and unequivocal indication
in either title or colophon about the royal author and his ancestry. Such clear
indications are missing for the texts of group 0. In a number of cases the names
of either Tudhaliyas or Arnuwandas are indeed mentioned : Tudhaliyas in Oat.
85, 86, 170, 172 and 178.1; Arnuwandas in Oat. 86, 87, 174 and perhaps in 176,
if XL 60 (Bo 7339) really belongs to that text 1 But the necessary indications
of a genealogical nature to determine which Tudhaliyas and Arnuwandas are
meant are curiously lacking, unless one assumes that both kings were the first
of their names and that explanatory indications are therefore superfluous.
Even if one does try to apply other criteria as well, it is still necessary to test
the historical consequences of this hypothetical alternative. Is this different
attribution precluded in a more general sense by what we know for certain about
the development of Hittite history~ In my opinion it is not : these texts certainly
make as much sense during the early decades of the Empire period between
the rapid successes of Tudhaliyas II and the disastrous situation in the beginning
of Suppiluliumas' reign, as they do at the end of the Hittite New Empire. The
customary picture of the last decades of Hittite history - a growing disinte-
gration in the east as well as in the west - is largely based on exactly these com-
positions and finds no unequivocal support in other material. But it is possible to
quote other sources in order to describe the chain of events which led up to the
disastrous situation under Suppiluliumas I. Admittedly, these sources may be
partially dependent upon one another. Still as a group, they are independent
from the texts of groups B and 0.
The undoubtedly and the presumably Middle Hittite texts (B and 0) can without
difficulty be incorporated in an historical picture for the first decades of the New
Empire. And as they are combined with one another, no internal contradictions
emerge. Four preliminary remarks should be made before embarking on the
reconstruction of the history of this period from both groups of texts. In the
first place due attention should be paid to the fact that not only the annals of
Tudhaliyas II himself (Cat. 85), but also the annals in which Arnuwandas describes
1 Cf. von Schuler, Hethitische Dienstanweisungen, p. 61 and Goetze, JCS XIV (1960), p. 69.
the military campaigns of his father and himself (Cat. 86) may be used for a
description of the history of the Early Empire. In at least three passages of the
latter text Tudhaliyas and Arnuwandas are both called LUGAL.GAL, so that
there can be no doubt that Arnuwandas acted as eo-regent for a number of years 2
A second point of importance is that the texts in which the tuhukantis Tudhaliyas
is mentioned next to the king Arnuwandas and the queen Asmunikal should be
dated to a second phase of Arnuwandas' sole rule 3 Thirdly it is of importance
to recognize that, once having assigned the documents in which the tuhukantis
Tudhaliyas is included in the list of royal persons, to the later phase of Arnu-
wandas' reign, texts in which next to the king and the queen the princes in general
are referred to should be dated to an earlier period of the sole reign of Arnuwan-
das 4 In this way Cat. 87, 88 and 277 can be dated to a first, and Cat. 155 and
175 to a second phase of Arnuwandas' rule. Cat. 89, the indictment of Maddu-
wattas, starts out with events from the period of His Majesty's father, and this
indicates that the text itself should preferably be dated - next to the closely
related Cat. 88 - to this just mentioned first phase 5 Fourthly, the relation
between Cat. 85 and 86 should be specified. As has already been remarked by
Bossert, Karkisa, Kurupi and Lusa, three towns which are mentioned in an
enumeration of conquests at the beginning of the preserved parts of Cat. 85.2,
recur at the end of Cat. 86 6 This entails in my opinion that the events of Cat. 86
precede instead of follow what is described in Cat. 85.2. Therefore the campaigns
of which a historical record has been preserved follow one another in roughly
this order : a) Arzawa, Sariyanda, Uliwanda 7 , Parsuhalda 8 (Cat. 85.1), ...... 9 ,
2 See XXill 21 (Cat. 86) II : 13-14, 26-27; Ill : 19-20, and cf. Goetze, Madduwattas, p. 158 The
imperceptible transition in the indictment of ll'[adduwattas from events under Tudhaliyas II ("His
Majesty's father") in par. 8-15 to the crimes against His Majesty himself in par. 16-36 constitutes a
second proof for Arnuwandas' eo-regency.
3 Cf. K.Bo V 7 Rev.: 46,49 (Cat. 155); XXXI 42 Ill: 12, XXXI 44 I: 27, XXVI 24 IV: 5 (all belon-
ging to Cat. 175).
4 See XXVI 41 I : 19 and XXIII 68 Rev. : 7-9 (both belonging to Cat. 87); XXill 72 Rev. : 38-39
(Cat. 88).
5 See also the correspondencies between both texts mentioned in Chapter II, Chart II.
6 See Bossert, Asia, pp. 31-32 and Garstang-Gurney, Geography, p. 106.
7 Uliwanta = Waliwanta occurs in XXIII 27 I: 8 and is also found in a newly published fragment
of the "Deeds", KBo XII 26 IV : 15 near to Sallapa in line 17, in the Tawagalawa letter (XIV 3 I :
16 = Cat. 51 = Sommer, AU, pp. 2-3) and in the title deed for Sahurunuwas' descendants (XXVI
43 I : 42 = Cat. 81). Apparently it later belonged to Arzawa or the Lukka lands (see below, pp. 72-73).
8 Parsuhalda is mentioned in XXIII 27 I : 9 and is also found in many earlier and later texts. For
the localization at A9em Hoyiik, 10 miles west-north-west of Aksaray, see J. Lewy, Halil Edhem
Hdtira Kitabi Cilt I, Tiirk Tarih Kurumu, Yayinlarindan VII. Seri no. 5, Ankara, 1947, p. 15; P, Ga-
relli, Assyriens, p. 123 note 4 ("dans son cours professe au College de France, en 1961, J. Lewy propo-
sait de placer Burusbattum au Agemhiiyiik, au Sud du Lac Sal6''); H. Lewy, OAH fasc. 40, p. 18
("According to ressearches conducted on the site by J. Lewy, the city is most likely to be buried under
HISTORICAL CONSIDERATIONS 59
b) [Zu]nnahara 1o, Adaniya n, [Si]nnuwanda 12 (all three belonging to Kizzu-

watna), c) Ardukka, Masa and Hullusiwanda, d) Arzawa, Assaratta 13 , e) Karkisa,
Kurupi and Lusa (all three mentioned in both Cat. 86 and 85.2) 14, f and g) Assuwa
(two campaigns, h) and i) Gasga (two campaigns) and then, finally, j) Isuwa
(and perhaps Hurri land).
Two minor points may be added. Already in 1937 Forrer pointed to the fact
that the defeat of Kupanta-DKAL described in Cat. 86 may very well be identical
with the events narrated in Madduwattas, Obv. : 53 ff 15 In 1946 Bossert wrote
that the small fragment XXIII 14 mentioning both Hurri land and Isuwa and
also referring to Assuwa belongs to Cat. 86 1 6 His remark undoubtedly was correct,
and this piece proves that Cat. 86 also described the period for which only Cat. 85
has been preserved.
One important event of Tudhaliyas' reign is primarily known from a later source,
his conquest of both Aleppo and Mitanni. Cat. 49, a later treaty between Mu-
watallis and Talmi-Sarrumas of Aleppo, relates in the prologue that Tudha-
the huge mound known today as Agem Hiiyiik lowated some ten miles west-north-west of Aksaray".).
Forrer, RLA I, p. 227 suggests identity with Pasuhalta; see also Ranoszek in his edition referred to
in Appendix A (Ranoszek reads URUBa 7 -su-~al-da, suggesting that the town is the same as (KUR)
URUPa-su-Qal-ta in XXIII ll IT : 18 (Cat. 85.2) and as Pa-~u-u-~al-ta-as (without determinative!)
in XXXV 79 IV : 8 = Otten, LTU, p. 76 and Laroche, DLL, p. 130).
9 Unfortunately it is impossible to ascertain how many campaigns are missing at this point.
10 The name of this town was restored by Goetze, Kizzuwatna, p. 56 in XXIII 21 IT : 4. See also
KBo III 54 : 16 = 2 BoTU 17 B = Cat. 12 where Zunnahara is followed by Sinnuwanda. Zunnahara

can also be found in KBo IX 108 : 8.
11 Adaniya is mentioned in XXIII 21 IT : 5. An important later occurrence is to be found in the
boundary description belonging to the Sunassuras treaty (Cat. 36 = KBo I 5 IV: 54). For other occur-
rences in addition to this one and for an equation with modern Adana, see Goetze, Kizzuwatna, p. 56 ff.
12 The name of this town was restored by Goetze, Kizz~twatna, p. 56 in XXIII 21 IT : 6. The identi-
fication with present-day Sinanti was first proposed by Forrer, Forschungen I, p. 21; see also Goetze,
KIF I (1927), p. Ill.
13 The town of Assaratta is mentioned in XXIII 21 III : 4,5 and recurs in Cat. 294.1 (KBo IT 1 IT :
40) as a member of a group of places containing shrines of the Storm-god in the vicinity Mount Suwara.
This second passage was first adduced by Forrer, Klio XXX (1937), p. 173 ff.; see also Garstang-
Gurney, Geography, p. 108.
14 Karkisa is mentioned in XXIII 21 Ill: 30 (Cat. 86) and in XXIII ll IT: 16 (Cat. 85.2); Kuruppiya
in XXIII 21 III: 31 and XXIII ll IT: 17; Lusa in XXIII 21 Ill: 31 and in XXIII ll IT: 18. The
successive events described in Cat. 85.2 took place during a number of years : 1) end of year with an
enumeration of countries conquered; 2) year with 2 campaigns against Assuwa and a first battle against
the Gasgaeans at Tiwara; 3) second campaign against Gasgaeans in the following year; 4) year of
rest; 5) year with war against Isuwa.
15 Cf. Forrer, Klio XXX (1937), p. 175 on account of XXIII 21 (Cat. 86) IT : 26 ff.
16 See Bossert, Asia, p. 26.

liyas defeated both Aleppo and Mitanni 1 7 A. newly published duplicate of this
treaty proves that during the reign of Tudhaliyas II the king of Aleppo first
made peace with the Hittite king, but later defected to Mitanni 1 8. This led to
Tudhaliyas' war against and victory over both Mitanni and Aleppo. It seems
likely that the initial rapprochement between Aleppo and Hattusas was brought
about by a Hittite victory over Kizzuwatna, since an independent Kizzuwatna
precludes Hittite interference in Syrian affairs.
A.n annexation of Kizzuwatna is mentioned in so many words in another late

source, the prologue to Suppiluliumas' later treaty with Sunassuras II 1 9. Un-
fortunately the vague wording used - Suppiluliumas ascribes the victory to
his grandfather - makes it hard to decide which Hittite king actually conquered
the country of Kizzuwatna, since not all the details of the affiliation of the royal
line before Suppiluliumas are quite clear. However, a treaty with an older Sunas-
suras (I~) of Kizzuwatna probably preceded the actual annexation 20 This treaty,
Oat. 94, is still based upon a strict parity between the two partners. In the event
of an attack from the side of Mitanni on one of the two partners, the other partner
was free help or not, but the king of Kizzuwatna was bound not to admit foreign
troops into his territory and to protect his own land 21 A. text from Alalakh,
according to which Saussatar, king of Mitanni, decided a lawsuit between Niqmepa
of Alalakh and a king Sunassuras of presumably Kizzuwatna (A.T no 14) must
stem from a period during which Kizzuwatna fell under the jurisdiction of Mitanni,
i.e. either before the first treaty with an unnamed Hittite king, or after the later
defection of Kizzuwatna to Mitanni 22 In view of the customary chronology
which places Saussatar around 1450 B.O., the first alternative has more to recom-
mend it.
17 See KBo I 6 (Weidner, PD 1 no. 6, p. 80 ff. = Goetze, MAOG IV 1 (1928), p. 59 ff.) Obv. : 15 ff.
18 See H. Klengel, ZA LVI N.F. 22 (1964}, p. 213 ff.; see especially [is-l]iim in line 8. This reading
brought the confirmation of a text restoration for the main text proposed by Landsberger, JCS VIII
(1954), p. 61 note 132.
1 9 See KBo I 5 I: 56 = Goetze, Kizzuwatna, pp. 36-37: "Previously, in the days of my grandfather,
the country of Kizzuwatna had become (part) of Hatti land".
20 See above p. 5 together with note 17 and note 16 on p. 44. Both VIII 81 (Cat. 36.2 B) and XXXVI
127 (Cat. 94) show a number of archaisms : nu absent in the beginning of a main clause, -se instead
of -si (VIII 81 II: 10 and III: 1); a-ap-pa instead of EGIR-pa (systematically in XXXVI 127). Some
changes from VIII 81 to XXXVI 127 are of a stylistic type : e-ep-tu to e-ep-zi, pa-a-u to pa-a-i; in one
passage mu-un-na-iz-zi corresponds to sa-an-na-at-ta in XXXVI 127 and in another to sa-an-na-at-ta
[na-a]n mu-un-na-iz-zi. Sometimes VIII 81 has a syllabic reading where XXXVI 127 uses an Akka-
dogram. This feature could be explained on the basis of the assumption that VIII 81 represents a
dictated draft.
21 Cf. XXXVI 127 Obv. : 7-12 (Cat. 94).
22 Cf. KBo I 5 I: 5-7 = Goetze, Kizzuwatna, pp. 36-37.
Cat. 87 - a text from the first phase of Arnuwandas' sole rule - shows that
Arnuwandas was still able to settle the men of Ismerikka in various towns of
Kizzuwatna purely on his own authority 23 Apparently he had the right to do so.
The names of these towns are : Zazlippa 24 , Wassukanna/i 25 , Arana 26 , Terussa,
Uriga and Urussa 27 At that moment Kizzuwatna still extended into regions
that had formerly belonged to Mitanni. Wassukanni, the traditional capital,
was reckoned to belong to Kizzuwatnaean territory. It seems as if large parts
of Mitanni including the capital itself had been added to Kizzuwatna after this
state had become part of the Hittite mother country.
During the first phase of Arnuwandas' sole reign, H[urri land] 28 probably is
named as one of the countries the emissaries of which were forced to listen to
the king's diatribe against Mita of Pahhuwa 29 Others were Isuwa and Suhma
23 Cf. Goetze, Kizzuwatna, p. 76, JAOS LXXII (1952), p. 70 and JCS XI (1957), p. 58 (but see, too,
JCS VII (1953), p. 70 !). I follow Gurney in thinking that the men of Ismerikka were transferred to
Kizzuwatna, cf. Garstang-Gurney, Geography, p. 53 and OAH fasc. 44, p. 22.
24 This placename occurs in XXIII 68 + Re c. : 12, 24. According to Goetze, K izzuwatna, p. 72 and JCS
XI (19.57), p. 73 note 219, Zazlippa is identical with Zizzilippa in par. 24 of the Telibinus text (KBo
ill 1 II : 18, 19 = 2 BoTU 23 A = Cat. 21.2).
25 Wassukanna is mentioned in XXill 68 + Rev. : 13, 14, 15 and 16.
26 Next to the reference in XXIII 68 + Rev. : 19, this town is also mentioned in the title deed for
Sahurunuwas' descendants (XXVI 43 I: 40 = Cat. 81) in the same line as the town of Kizzuwatna.
2 7 Urussa occurs in XXIII 68 + Rev.: 22 and 23. It is also mentioned in the Cat. 36, Suppiluliumas'
treaty with Sunassuras II (KBo I 5 IV : 6 = Kizzuwatna, pp. 41-42) and in the title deed for Sahurunu-
was' descendants (in the same line as Arana and Kizzuwatna, XXVI 43 I: 40 = Cat. 81). For this
group as a whole, see Goetze, JCS VII (1953), p. 70 : "If Ismerik extends from the vicinity of Isuwa
to Irrita, the Kizzuwatnean territory referred to should be to the northwest of the Euphrates between
its break-through into the plain and Kargamish, i.e. in Kommagene. We would have to assume then
that Zazlippa, Wassukanna, Arana, Terussa, Uriga and Urussa are places in Ko=agene". Goetze
continues : "This would mean that W assukanna, here mentioned several times, is different from the
capital of the Mitanni kingdom". Personally I doubt the inevitability of this conclusion. Apparently
Goetze later changed his mind again, returning to his original position, cf. note 23.
2 8 This text restoration was first proposed by Sommer, AU, p. 47 and later accepted by Gurney,
AAA XXVill (1948), pp. 37 and 43. See also p. 4 together with note 14. This geographical entity
has been a matter of controversy for a long time, cf. M. Liverani, Hurri e Mitanni, Oriens Antiquus I
(1962), p. 253 ff. Usually it is identical with the state of Mitanni, but sometimes it seems to denote
independent Hurrian forces (e.g. after the conquest of Mitanni by Tudhaliyas II). In addition to XXill
72 Rev. : 36 and XXXI 103 : 18 (Cat. 178.10), see also XXill 14 II : 3 (Cat. 86), XXIV 4 + XXX 12
Obv. : 17 (Cat. 283 C) and KBo XI 40 VI : 11 (Cat. 533). A king of the Hurrians is mentioned in Cat.
85.2 (XXIII 11 Ill : 28).
29 The town of Pahhuwa occurring repeatedly in XXill 72 has been identified by Garstang, AAA
XXVIII (1948), pp. 48-54 with modern Divrigi. The town recurs in Mursilis' Extensive Annals, KBo
V 8 IV : 20 = AM, pp. 162-163. See also XXXI 103, left rim : 1 as restored above, p. 4 note 14.
as well as the towns of Maltiya 30 and Pittiyarik 3 1 (Cat. 88). Probably all these
countries had already been conquered during the reign of Tudhaliyas II. .A cam-
paign against Isuwa (and Hurri land ( ~) )is actually mentioned in Cat. 85 and
86.
Tudhaliyas II stands out as an active, highly successful monarch, warrior and
hunter and apparently at the end of his career a legislator as well (see in this
respect Cat. 172; Cat. 178.1 and the closely related 179.9 might be slightly younger
and could stem from a later king Tudhaliyas). No Hittite king penetrated so far
to the west. During his campaigns he twice vanquished .Arzawa and afterwards
in the northwest the country of Assuwa (Cat. 85; see also Cat. 86 and 172). Both
Cat. 85 and 86 prove that these Assuwa campaigns took place before the conflict
with Isuwa. In the context of this latter conflict the Hurrian king plays an indeter-
minable role, since Cat. 85.2 is badly broken at this point of the narrative 3 2.
Apparently Tudhaliyas' victory over Assuwa was hailed as an important achieve-
ment, since the law-text Cat. 172 opens with these words : "When I had destroyed
Assuwa and had returned to Hattusas, I performed (the festivals of) the gods
and the whole Hittite population began to pay hommage to me and they spoke
as follows : "Majesty, you, our lord, are a warrior ( ~), but you were unable to
administer justice". The remainder of the text is then devoted to a reform oflawss.
One important point deserves to be duly stressed : already Tudhaliyas had to
combat the Gasgaeans who would prove a threat to the very existence of the
state during the following generations (Cat. 85).
At the height of his career Tudhaliyas II apparently exercized supreme suzerainty

over a very large territory stretching from the west coast of Asia Minor to .Aleppo
and to the mountainous regions of Malatya, Isuwa and Suhma in the east. At
that moment he ruled over an empire that can stand a comparison to the Old
Hittite kingdom at the zenith of its power. There can be no doubt that he was
one of the greatest Hittite kings, on a par with figures like Hattusilis and Mursilis
for the kingdom period and Suppiluliumas I and Mursilis II for later Empire
times.
30 Maltiya (near modern Malatya) occurs in XXIII 72 Rev. : 37 and probably also in XXXI 103, left
rim: 4 (Oat. 178.10), see above p. 4 note 14. It recurs in 679 fz- the Hittite concept for an official letter to
Salmanassar I (1274-1245 B.O.) - , cf. Otten, MO XXII (1968-1969), pp. 112-113.
31 This place name occurs in XXill 72 Rev. : 77 and has been restored by Forrer, Oaucasia IX (1931),
pp. 7 and 20 in Rev. : 1 and 37 (the newly published piece XL 10 joins to XXIII 72 Rev. : 36-39 and
proves Forrer right for Rev. : 37 !). In contrast to Garstang-Gurney, Geography, p. 36 and Goetze,
JOS XIV (1960), p. 47, I much prefer a localization of Pittiyarik and Samuha on the Euphrates or on
the l\Iurad Su instead of on the Halys, cf. Alp, Anatolia I (1956), p. 77 ff. and Giiterbock, JNES XX
(1961), p. 96 (see also Garstang, JNES I (1942), pp. 450-459 before this scholar changed his mind on
this point).
32 See below, p. 78.
Above I have already commented upon the fact that in a text from the first
phase of .Arnuwandas' reign H[urri land] seems to be mentioned as a state under
formal Hittite rule (Cat. 88). This tablet attests to a widespread unrest in the
northeast of the Empire, as will be sketched below. In another composition from
this period, which seems to be closely related with Cat. 88, Hurri land is referred
to as a potential enemy of the Hittite king (Cat. 178.10) 34 Therefore this text
might be slightly younger. It would be possible to assume that after the conquest
of Mitanni and the annexation of its capital to Kizzuwatna the term Hurri land
was still used for a more northerly group of Hurrian forces bordering upon Isuwa
and Suhma in the direction of Lake Van. It is possible, in my opinion, that the
migration of the nobles of Ismerikka 35 to various towns in Kizzuwatna took
place under pressure from such enemies (cf. Cat. 87 as referred to above). But
in another, presumably later text from this same general period, Cat. 283 C,
Hurri land and Mitanni are again clearly used as synonyms for the same geogra-
phical and political entity as.
In the northeast (Mita of Pahhuwa, Cat. 88) and in the west (Madduwattas,
Cat. 89) the situation suddenly deteriorated from bad to worse, and apparently
this already took place during the first phase of .Arnuwandas' sole rule. Both
texts, Madduwattas and Mita of Pahhuwa, have justly been compared to one
another. The wording of both compositions shows remarkable similarities, and
their subject matter is essentially the same. Both texts center around the mis-
behaviour of an unfaithful vassal of the Hittite king.
Madduwattas, a western prince of Zippasla, who had fled from Attarissiya, man
of Ahhiya, to Tudhaliyas and had been re-installed as vassal prince over the
mountainous region of Zippasla, was clearly dissatisfied with a subordinate role 3 7
His first attempts met with disaster, and twice he had to be saved by Hittite
commanders from a menacing enemy force, first when he fought with .Arzawa
and secondly when Attarissiya renewed his attack. Thereafter Madduwattas
began to deceive his Hittite protector. He intrigued with the inhabitants of
33 Cf. von Schuler, Hethitische Konigserlasse, pp. 446 and 448-449.

34 See XXXI 103 Obv.: 17 ff. (Cat. 178.10) in a fragmentary passage.
35 For a localization from the vicinity of Isuwa to Irritaje, see Goetze, JCS VII (1953}, p. 70 as quoted
in note 27.
36 See XXIV 4 + XXX 12 Obv. : 17 (~ur-la-as KUR-e) and ibidem: 21 (KUR URUMi-it-ta-an-ni).
Mitanni is repeatedly mentioned in XXXVI 127 Obv. : 7, ll, 13 (Cat. 94). See also the "Fremdlander
Liste" in KBo ll 9 + XV 35 I : 25 = KBo ll 36 I : 7 (Cat. 406) and in XV 34 I : 52 (Cat. 416).
3 7 From the wording of Madduwattas, Obv. : 13 ff., par. 4, follows in my opinion that Hariyati is
not identical with Zippasla. Madduwattas had been offered the mountain of Hariyati, but he refused
this fief which seems to have been close to Hatti land. Apparently Zippasla was much farther to the west.
Dalawa 38 and made that town tributary to himself instead of to the Hittite
king. Later, during the eo-regency of Arnuwandas, he concluded a treaty with
Kupanta-DKAL, king of Arzawa and important adversary of the Hittite interests.
During a later stage of his career he asked His Majesty's father for Siyanta river
land 39 under the promise that he would guard the Hittite frontiers against the
enemy 40 He apparently received it as a fief, and in the ensuing sequence of
events he finally took the whole of Arzawa 41
At that time the country of Mira-Kuwaliya was apparently non-existent. Maddu-

wattas received Siyanta river land from His Majesty's father, and his treason
with respect to Hapalla (see below) was exposed by Antahittas, GAL [ ......],
and by Mazlauwas, "the man of Kuwali" 42 Later, during the reign of Mursilis II,
both the Siyanta river and Kuwali 4 3 form landmarks of the country Mira-Ku-
waliya 44
Some time later he added Hapalla 45 , a Hittite possession, to his domain and
took a whole group of towns of unknown location but presumably lying some-
38 Dalawa is also known from the "Fremdlander Liste" XV 34 I: 60 (Cat. 416) where it occurs before
Masa. It is also found in XXIII 83 (Cat. ll4} : in connection with Kuwalapassa (ibidem : I, 9}, Iya-
landa (ibidem: 5, 7) and Awarna (ibidem: 22). Of these Kuwalapassa and Iyalanda are in late texts
connected with the Lukka lands (cf. notes 48 and 105). Awarna recurs in the Milawata letter (XIX 55
left rim : 1 ff. = So=er, A U, pp. 204-205} and in XXXIV 43 : 5 (cf. note 99).
3~ The Siyanta river is mentioned in 11'/adduwattas, Rev. : ll, 14 and 15. For an identification with
the Senarus (Turkisch Banaz}, a tributary of the Maeander, see Garstang-Gurney, Geography, pp. 91-
92.
40 Cf. Forrer, Klio XXX (1937), p. 168 together with note 3 : Forrer reads u ?-e-e[k]-ta in Rev. :
ll and adds three signs at the end of line 12 which had been neglected according to Forrer by Goetze
(cf. Forrer, I.e., note 4). It is possible, but not necessary to assume with Forrer that Madduwattas
had definitely lost Zippasla in the meantime to Attarissiya.
41 Cf. Forrer, I.e., p. 167 ff. who rightly stresses Rev. : 20. But it is true that Kupanta-DKAL is still
mentioned at a later point of the narrative, Rev. : 43 ff. Is that a retrospective passage?
42 Reading Qa-an-ti-ti-ia-tal-le-es at the end of Rev. : 28, cf. Forrer, I.e., p. 169 note 2.
43 This town is mentioned in Madduwattas, Rev. : 28. For a localization of the land of Mira to the
south and west of the Akar Qay, see Garstang-Gurney, Geography, p. 91.
44 Cf. Friedrich, Staatsv. I, pp. ll6-ll7, par. 9.
45 Hapalla occurs in XXIII ll IT: 16 (Cat. 85.2}, in Madduwattas, passim, and of course in numerous
younger texts. For a localization in the Hermos valley, see Giiterbock, Istanb. Mitt. XVII (1967},
p. 70.
where on the west coast of Asia Minor 46 : Zumanti, Wallarimma 47, Yalanti
(= Iyalanda) 4B, Zumarri, Mutamutassa 49 , Attarimma, Suruta and Hursanassa 50
In eastern direction he expanded towards Pitassa 51 and he persuaded the com-
manders and the "aldermen" (L U.MES SU.GI) of that region to desert the Hittite
camp and to join him. Although he had started out in a central, mountainous
region, his territory apparently now extended to the sea. A coalition consisting
of Attarissiya, his former enemy but now one of his allies, "the man from Pig-
gaya", and Madduwattas himself, was even able to ravage Alasiya, the island
of Cyprus 52
The other tablet is in the form of an official address to the aldermen of Isuwa,
Pahhuwa, Suhma, H[urri] land], Maltiya and Pittiyarik. The obverse of the
tablet and about thirty lines of the reverse as well are devoted to a description
of Mita's crimes. He married the daughter of Usapa, an outspoken enemy of the
Hittite king, and apparently this had been the first step in a mischievous career.
Pahhuwa had been asked for extradition of Mita together with all his family,
dependants and possessions. The addressees of the text are held responsible
for the town's behaviour in the days to come. In two passages the names of these
representatives together with their city of origin are enumerated. Many of the
place names are missing on account of the fragmentary character of the tablet,
some of them are unknown from other texts, but Alatarma s 3, Hinzuta s4, Sul-
4il See Madduwattas, Rev. : 29-30 and 57.

47 Wallarimma is mentioned in XXIII 11 II : 7 (Cat. 85. 2) as a conquest of Tudhaliyas II. In XXI
6 Rev. : 7 (Cat. 72) Wallarimma occurs after the Lukka lands have been mentioned in the preceding
line.
48 Iyalanda as the place name is written in XXIII 83 : 5, 7 (Cat. 114) and in the Tawagalawa letter
(XIV 3 I: 18 ff. = Cat. 51 = So=er, AU, p. 2 ff.) occurs in the "Fremdlander Liste" XV 34 I: 61
(Cat. 416) as URui-ia-la-an-ti and in Madduwattas, Rev.: 29, as URUia-la-an-ti (cf. also Rev.: 57 URUI.
ia-la[-an-ti ...]).
49 In Madduwattas, Rev. : 30, the name of this town is written URuMu-u-ta-mu-u-ta-as-sa. Perhaps
URUMu-ta-mu-ta-si, as mentioned in KBo XVI 47 : 5, should be considered as identical or otherwise
related.
so Attari=a, Hursanassa and Suruta are known from Mursilis' Arzawa campaign (XIV 15 III :
28 ff. = AM, p. 52; XIV 16 III : 30 ff. = AM, p. 58). All this conclusively proves that these towns
were located in the west, presumably on the coast, but from what we know now it is hard to deduce
more precise localizations.
51 Next to the country of Lukka the country of Pitassa is mentioned in XXIV 4 + XXX 12 Obv. :
27 (Cat. 283 C). See also Madduwattas, Rev. : 39, 42 and 50. Already long ago Goetze located Pitassa
around (and most likely north of) Konya, cf. KIF I (1927), p. UO ff., Madduwattas, pp. 148 and 153,
more recently, JCS XIV (1960), p. 48.
52 Madduwattas, Rev. : 84 ff. = So=er, A U, p. 337 ff.
53 The town of Alatarma is mentioned in XXIII 72 Rev. : 34 (Cat. 88) and recurs in Cat. 533.1 (II
1 I : 45; III : 36), for which see p. 75. An eastern location follows from KBo IV 14 II : 11 (Cat. 92).
54 This town - mentioned in XXIII 72 Rev. : 33 - can also be found in the Old Hittite text Cat.
8.2 (XXXVI 103 : 4) where the context unmistakenly suggests an easterly location.
lama 5 5, Dukkamma 5s and Wattarusna 5 7 are known from other material and
their approximate location is in good agreement with the larger entities, as men-
tioned above.
The composition does indeed suggest that there were dangerous signs of unrest
in the eastern provinces during the reign of Arnuwandas. Indirect remarks shed
important light on the events of the period:"[ ...... And as for those who] escaped
from before [the arm]y [of My Majesty], the people of Arhita [ ... if any of them]
has come in, [bring] everyone in" 58 Arhita 59 was a town in the Hayasa region
just like Dukkamma, which is mentioned as the town of origin for one of the
aldermen taken under oath in this text so_ Isuwa 61, Kummaha 62 (and Timmiya s3 n
have been invaded from Pahhuwa 64 and the king - Arnuwandas - has cam-
paigned in Kummaha s5.
55 The town of Sullama occurs in XXIII 72 Rev. : 32. In the geographical list belonging to Muwa
tallis' "Prayer to be spoken in an Emergency" it is mentioned in the group of Isuwa (VI 45 IT : 64 =
VI 46 m : 30 = Cat. 285).
56 The town of Dukka=a is mentioned in XXIII 72 Rev. : I. Dukka=a recurs later in Mursilis'
Annals as a town ofHayasa (KBo m 4 IV: 37,40 =AM, pp. 132-137; KBo IV 4 IV: 17, 18, 24,
25 = AM, pp. 134-137). In view of the fact that Arhita forms another link between Cat. 88 and the
Hayasa region, I see no reason to assume that there were two towns of the same name, as is done by
Cornelius, Anatolica I (1967), p. 69. See especially Forrer, Causasica IX (1931), pp. 6, 8 and 19 where
Dukka=ana (Cat. 39 : XXVI 39 I! : 33) is compared to Dukka=a.
57 This place name occurs in XXIII 72 Rev. : 33. See Forrer, Glotta XXVI (1938), p. ISO note 3
for additional references, none of which is conclusive as far as the location is concerned.
58 XXIII 72 Obv. : 43-45.
59 The town of Arhita is mentioned not only in XXIII 72 Obv.: 43, but also in XXVI 39 I!: 32 (Cat. 39),
a Hayasa treaty dealt with by Forrer, Caucasica IX (1931), p. 6 ff., and in XXVI 62 IV : 34 (Cat.
160 = von Schuler, Die Kalkiier, pp. 142-145), cf. already Forrer, I.e., p. 8. In the last text the name
is written as URUE-er-:gi-ta. Both Arhita and Dukka=a (see above) form links between the geogra-
phical background to Cat. 88 and the Hayasa region.
so XXIII 72 Rev. : I.
61 XXIIT 72 Rev. : 13 ff. and perhaps also the passage adduced in note 64.
62 The town of Kunrmaha is mentioned in XXIIT 72 Obv. : 31 and Rev. : 16. It is also known from
the "Fremdlander Liste" KBo IT 9 + XV 35 I : 35 (next to Hayasa ! Cat. 406) and from XV 34 I :
58 (Cat. 416). It recurs in an early piece of the "Deeds", fr. 13 D IV : 43-44 = JCS X (1956), p. 66.
In view of the fact that in this fragment it was the scene of a battle field in a war agaiust Hayasa,
I doubt the identity with Assyrian Kunrmuhu and Greek Ko=agene proposed by Goetze, Kizzu-
watna, p. 5 note 21 and p. 47 note 183. Forrer, Caucasica IX (1931), p. 2 and Garstang-Gurney, Geo-
graphy, p. 35 equated it with modern Kemakh. An enemy force from Kummaha is mentioned in IBoT
I 36 m : 35-36 (Cat. 169 = L. Jakob-Rost, MIO XI (1966), pp. 194-195), see below p. 68.
63 Ti=iya is mentioned in XXIII 72 Obv. : 32. It might be identical with URUTe-mi-ia in XXVI
62 IV : 36 (Cat. 160 = von Schuler, Die Kalkiier, pp. 142-145), cf. Forrer, Caucasia IX (1931), p. 8.
Goetze, JCS XIV (1960), p. 46 compares it to Timna/Ti=ina in KBo I 1 I: 12, 21 (Cat. 32) in the
so-called Isuwa list.
s4 xxm 72 Obv. : 30 ff.
65 XXIIT 72 Rev. : 16 ff.
Because the tuhukantis Tudhaliyas is not yet mentioned in Oat. 277, it is probable
that this royal prayer by Arnuwandas and Asmunikal about the disruption
of the cults in those districts which had been ravaged by the Gasgaeans still
belongs to the first phase of his sole rule. In two passages the lost districts
are enumerated 66 : Nerik 67 , Hursama, Kastama 68 , Serissa, Himuwa 69 , Tag-
gasta, Kammama, Zalpuwa, Kapiruha, Hurna, Dankusna, Tapasawa, Tarukka 70 ,
Ilaluha, Zihhana 71 , Sipidduwa 72 , Washaya 73 , Patalliya (A II : 20-25) and Kas-
tama, Taggasta, Serissa, Tastaressa, Takkupsa, Kammama and Nerik (A III :
7-10). In my opinion the Gasgaean treaties dating from this period - in the
first place Oat. 179.6, but perhaps Oat. 95, 96 and the majority of Oat. 97 as well-
bear some relation to the negotiations with the Gasgaeans which are alluded
to in this prayer 74 When von Schuler published his book, he was led by his
different dating of this material to a contrary opinion, but now such a connection
seems to be well-founded.
These treaties show that it was good Hittite policy to differentiate between
allied and hostile groups among the Gasgaean nomads. A settlement or tribe
66 V on Schuler, Die Ka8/ciier, passim has extensively dealt with all these place names. I limit my
remarks to new data.
67 This place name also occurs in XXI 10 : 3 ("Deeds", fr. 50 = JCS X (1956), p. 117 ff.). For this
text, see below p. 80. It is not a coincidence that the MELQET-lists of KBo XVI 71-73, 74, 76, 80
and 84, which refer to northerly sanctuaries and name Nerik (KBo XVI 72 : 4) and Kastama (KBo
XVI 73 : 5 and 74 : 8), are written in "Old Script". These texts go back to the period before these
towns were lost to the Gasgaeans.
68 For the occurrence of this place name in the JYIELQET-lists, see the preceding note.
69 This place name also occurs in XIII 2 III: 33 (Cat. 176 A = von Schuler, Hethitische Dienstan-
weisungen, p. 48). For this town, see Goetze, JCS VII (1953), p. 69. Apparently warriors from this
town enjoyed certain privileges during the Old Kingdom period which they shared with the Manda
and Sala warriors (for Sala see also XXVI 62 IV: 33 = Cat. 160 = von Schuler, Die Kalfkiier, p. 145)
and men from Hatra (in Isuwa), Zalpa and Tashiniya. In the instructions to the Commander of the
Border Guards quoted below, troops from Himuwa are mentioned next to soldiers from Kassiya,
Tegarama and Isuwa. There seems to have been a continuous tradition to recruit troops in the north
and the northeast. The Old Kingdom evidence referred to above can be found in Tablet I of the Laws,
par. 54.
70
An approximate localization of Tarukka is possible on the basis of its occurrence in the "Deeds",
fr. 34 : 35 = JCS X (1956), p. 110.
71 Zihhana recurs in the Extensive Annals of Mursilis II, fr. 3 III : 6 ( = MIO III (1955), p. 168).
For an approximate localization, see the writer, Anatolica I (1967), p. 48 and Chart II on p. 57.
72
As Sapidduwa this town recurs later in the "Deeds" and in the Annals ofMursilis. For an approxi-
mate localization, see the writer, Anatolica I (1967), p. 48 and Chart II on p. 57.
73
The town ofWashaya recurs in the "Deeds", fr. 34: 33 = JCS X (1956),p. 109 and may be restored
in the additional fragment of Mursilis' Extensive Annals KBo XIV 20 II : 7 ( = JNES XXV (1966),
pp. 173 and 181). For an approximate localization, see the writer, Anatolica I (1967), p. 48.
74
XVII 21 IV : 11 ff. (Cat. 277 = von Schuler, Die Kalfkiier, pp. 160-161).
which had been pacified was called a takSulas URU-as in contrast to a kururas
URU-as 75 One is reminded of this distinction when- in the instruction for the
Palace Guards - the term EREM.MES URUQa-a-as-ga ku-u-ru-ra-as is used
in the description of the proceedings for an interlocution between the king and
an enemy force from the north 76 In the same context troops from Kummaha
are also referred to. This passage is worth mentioning, because the instruction
IBoT I 36 (Cat. 169) for the Palace Guards shows a number of clear Middle Hittite
traits 77 Both the Gasgaeans and enemies from Kummaha recur a number of
times in historical texts from this period.
One important text undoubtedly belongs to the second phase of Arnuwandas'

reign, and this is Cat. 175 which embodies the pacts this king concluded with
the dignitaries of a group northern of towns centering around Kinnara, Kalasma/
HAR-ranassa and Kissiya. Cat. 155 - the land grant decree in favour of Ku-
watallas, the SAL.SUHUR.LAL and authoress of a well-known group of Luwian
rituals, -provides a second text stemming from the second phase of Arnuwan-
das' reign. Generally speaking it may be said that the treaties with the Gasgaeans
and with the town of Ura 7 8 on the one hand 79 , and the instructions for the Mayor
of Hattusas (Cat. 174) and the Commander of the Border Guards (Cat. 176) on
the other, all suggest that there was a growing need for strong measures against
unrest and disorder.
The situation described in Cat. 283 C -war against the Hurrians, Kizzuwatna
and Arzawa, and movements for independence in Gasgaean territory (the north),
(Arawanna) 80 and Kalasma 81 (the northwest), Lukka and Pitassa (the west)
- perhaps prevailed during the second phase of Arnuwandas' reign but could
75 Cf. XXIII 77 + (Cat. 95) and XXVI 19 (Cat. 97.1), both passim.
76 IBoT I 36 III: 35-36 (Cat. 169 = L. Jakob-Rost, MIO XI (1966). pp. 194-195). The comparison
with XXVI 19 was already made by So=er, ZA XLIX N.F. 15 (1950), p. 344.
77 The text consistently writes ma-a-a~-~a-an, shows both ti-i-e-ez-zi and ti-ia-az-zi, ti-en-zi and
ti-an-zi, uses ape as nom. plur. comm. gen., parnassa as "directive", writes ne-e-a-ri and has iskida~w
and manninkuwaw as 3rd pers. sing. Present tense.
78 In the first place there is a city URUU-ra-a, known from XXVI 29 +XXXI 55: 9 (Cat. 99), KBo
XVI 43 : 9 and recurring in the Annals of Mursilis II, XIV 17 III : 21, 24 = AM, pp. 98-99. This
city belonged to Azzi-Hayasa. But there may be a second and different URU1J-ra-a, occurring in KBo
XVI 47, passim, and also in the "Fremdlander Liste" KBo II - + XV 35 I: 38 (Cat. 406).
79 It is possible that we should reckon with two treaties, both concluded by Arnuwandas I and both
referring to a town Ura. Cat. 99 is usually dated to Arnuwandas' reign and in view of the personal
name Huhazalmas it seems likely that KBo XVI 47 also belongs to the time of Arnuwandas, see above
p. 4 together with note 13.
80 Arawanna may be restored in XXIV 4 + XXX 12 Obv. : 27 from the later revision Cat. 283 A.
For a localization in the northwest, see Forrer, RLA I, p. 139 and also Goetze, JCS XIV (1960), p. 4Mf.
81 For a northwestern localization, see Goetze, JCS XIV (1960), p. 45 ff.
also refer to the reign of a later predecessor of Suppiluliumas. At the moment

Cat. 283 C was composed, Pitassa had already fallen to Madduwattas or to his
successor. There was already or, more precisely, once more an open conflict with
Arzawa. The reference to war in the east with both the Hurrians and Kizzu-
watna clearly indicates that the text is posterior to Cat. 87 and 88. I have already
mentioned that in Cat. 283 C Hurri land and Mitanni again refer to the same
political entity. This also points to a slightly later date for this text. But it should
be stressed that the general tone of Oat. 283 0 bears testimony to a wide espansion
of the Hittite Empire in a recent past.
Perhaps I should add here that Suppiluliumas' treaty with Sunassuras II indi-
cates that after the country of Kizzuwatna "had become (part) of Hatti land"
it "afterwards seceded from Hatti land and shifted allegiance to Hurri land" 82
It is unclear whether this happened during the reign of the same king who had
conquered Kizzuwatna or in the time of another predecessor of Suppiluliumas
on the Hittite throne. Two other texts bear on the history of Kizzuwatna during
this general period. Kantuzzilis, a Hittite prince who also acted as general under
a king Tudhaliyas, was made priest in Kizzuwatna just like Telibinus in the
time of Suppiluliumas 83 Mursilis II relates how one of his ancestors, the great
king Tudhaliyas, for one reason or another transposed the "Black Deity" from
the town of Kizzuwatna to Samuha 8 4
A date, late in the reign of Arnuwandas, probably holds good for the instructions
to the Commander of the Border Guards, which mention troops from Kassiya,
82 See KBo I 5 I: 5-7 = Goetze, Kizzuwatna, pp. 36-37.

83 Kantuzzilis is the name of a general mentioned in XXIII 16 Ill : 5, 7 (Oat. 123.8) who served
under a king Tudhaliyas, see below, p. 78. He might be the same as the general mentioned in the "Deeds"
fr. 2 and 3 (= JOS X (1956), p. 60). It seems likely that this Kantuzzilis was the son of a Tudhaliyas
(cf. Giiterbock's text restoration in fragment 2). He could very well be identical with the bearer of
this same name Kantuzzilis who is mentioned in Oat. 179 : XXXIV 40 : 9 (Oat. 179.1), XXXVI 112 : 3
(Oat. 179.3), XXXVI 113: 9 (Oat. 179.4), XXXVI 114 II: 10, 12 (Oat. 179.5), XXXVI 118: 3 (Oat.
179.8), XXXIV 58 I: 4 (Oat. 291.5, but in fact related to Oat. 179). However, the general from the time
of Mursilis II should preferably be kept separate : XIV 17 IT : 20 ff. = AM, p. 86 and now also KBo
VIII 34 + KBo XVI 12 : 8 = JNES XXV (1966), p. 168. He might be a grandson of the preceding
general.
The author of the prayer to the Sun-god XXX 10 (Oat. 275) could very well be the Kantuzzilis men-
tioned in the colophon XVII 22 IV : 1 ( = Goetze, Kizzuwatna, p. 12 note 52 : (1) [DUB.X.KAM QA]-Tl
INIM MKan-tu-zi-li (2) [GIM-an ... S]A nu D]Je-bat (3) [1-NA URUKi-iz-zu-wa-a]t-ni LUSANGA i-en-zi).
Goetze concluded that this priestship had been filled by Kantuzzilis himself. In the library catalogue
XXX 56 Ill : 7 LUSANGA DUMU.LUG.AL is added to his name (Oat. 188.19).
The identity of the author of the prayer to the Sun-god with the general from the time of Suppiluliu-
mas' father ( 1) has already been proposed by Giiterbock, JAOS LXXVIII (1958), p. 238.
84 XXXII 133 I : 1-10 (Oat. 431 = von Schuler, Die Ka8/cii,er, pp. 165-166).
Himuwa, Tegarama and Isuwa in manuscript Cat. 176 A. But it should be stressed
that - quite characteristically - another manuscript, Cat. 176 I, uses a vague,
nondescript term instead ss. With respect to Kalasma (Cat. 283 C) and Kassiya
(Cat. 176 A), it is of importance to note that the Hittite claims on these towns
are corroborated by the fact that version B of Arnuwandas' pact with the digni-
taries of a group of northern towns concerned Kalasma/HAR-ranassa ss and
version C Kissiya s 7 Version A was addressed to Kinnara, the center of a district,
which has not yet been localized.
Somewhere in this general framework there is ample space for the humiliations
inflicted by Arzawa on the Hittite king mentioned in a royal prayer to the Sun-god
(Cat. 276) and the victory over that country referred to in passing in Cat. 310,
the Soldiers' Oath, a text which shows many characteristics of Middle Hittite ss.
Perhaps it is useful to elaborate here on the role of Arzawa s9 in this period.
The fact that Arzawa was an important power already is reflected in the mere
presence of the Arzawa letters in the Amarna Archive (EA nos 31-32 = VBoT
nos 1-2). Commenting on the replacement of Luwiya by Arzawa in manuscript B
of the Laws, Tablet I, par. 19 Friedrich remarked 90 : "Jedoch ware es auch
denkbar, dass ein Luwiya der alteren Fassung in einem jiingeren Exemplar
einfach deshalb durch Arzawa ersetzt worden sei, weil man mit dem veraltetem
Begriff Luwiya nichts mehr anfangen konnte, vielleicht auch weil Arzawa damals
85 Cf. XIII 2 (A) Ill: 33-34 as compared to XIII 25 (I) IV: 7-8 = von Schuler, Hethitische Dienst-
anweisungen, p. 48.
86 HAR-ranassa is mentioned in XXXI 42 II : 6; Ill : 15, 17 (Cat. 175 B). According to Giiterbock,
JNES XX (1961), pp. 90-92 it is perhaps a variant form ofHarrana, situated not too far from Hattusas
in northwesterly direction. See, too, von Schuler, Die Ka8/ciier, p. 32 note 157.
87 Kissiya equals Kassiya in the same manner as Sipidduwa is identical with Sapidduwa. In addition
to XXVI 24 II: 4 (Cat. 175 C) and XIII 2 III: 33 (Cat. 176 A), KJGassiya is also mentioned in KBo
VI 28 Obv. : 10 (Cat. 58), see below p. 78 .
S8 For the Soldiers' Oath an attribution to the beginning of the Empire period can be based upon
the following arguments: I) forms like i-en-zi and i-en-du; 2) the use of both ke and ape instead of
kiis and apiis; 3) the interchange between -as and -us as ace. plur. comm. gender of the Enclitic pro-
noun; 4) the intermittent use of either medio-passive or active forms of the verb sarra- in transitive
function accompanied by either -kan or -asta; 5) forms like paitti and daitti. See also von Schuler,
Die Ka8/ciier, p. ll3 for a comparison between passages in the Gasgaean treaties on the one hand and
the Soldiers' Oath on the other.
89 At this point I should warn the reader that I have been unable to use the book by F. Kinal, Geo-
graphie et l'Histoire des Pays d'Arzawa, 1953. The country of Arzawa is mentioned in XXIII 27 I :
3, 12 (Cat. 85.1), XXIII ll II : 3 (Cat. 85.2), XXIII 21 II : 16, 31 (Cat. 86), Madduwattas, Obv. : 46;
Rev. : 20 (Cat. 89). It also occurs in XXXI 130 Rev. : 10 (Cat. 276 B), XXIV 4 + XXX 12 Obv. :
17, 22 (Cat. 283 C) and in KBo XI 40 VI: 15 (see below, p. 75). An occurrence in the "Fremdlander
Liste" KBo II 9 + XV 35 I : 36 (Cat. 406) and in the replica XV 34 I : 59 = XV 38 I : 7 (Cat. 416)
may still be added.
90 Friedrich, Die hethitischen Gesetze, Leiden, 1959, p. 92.
eine wichtige Rolle spielte". I feel quite certain that this last explanation is right.
In Chapter II version B was dated to the beginning of the Empire period.
In the case of Arzawa there never has been any doubt that three entities should
be kept strictly separate, a) the country of Arzawa in the beginning of the Empire
period, b) the Arzawa lands (first mentioned in the Alaksandus treaty from the
time of Muwatallis, but nowhere mentioned in either the "Deeds" or Mursilis'
Annals), c) the vassal-state of Arzawa proper from the time of Mursilis and Muwa-
tallis, henceforward denoted as Arzawa Minor 91 It is highly likely that c) formed
the nucleus of a), and that b) presents us with the largest extension a) ever reached.
Unfortunately there is no general agreement on the question which countries

did belong to the Arzawa lands. Friedrich 92 includes next to Arzawa Minor
itself Mira-Kuwaliya, Hapalla and Seha river land 93 Goetze reckons with Arza-
wa Minor, Mira-Kuwaliya, Hapalla, Seha river land and Wjlusa 94 Forrer, too,
includes Wilusa but omits Seha river land 95 The most careful approach therefore
consists in the omission of both Wilusa and Seha river land as neighbouring
countries which - depending on the political situation of the moment - might
or might not be reckoned to the group.
In view of Cat. 85.2. where Seha river (land) and the land of Hapalla are mentioned
as separate entities next to Arzawa, one might assume that Arzawa reached
its zenith after this campaign of Tudhaliyas II 96 It could be argued that this
took place during the reign of Arnuwandas, if the dishonest vassal Madduwattas
really acted as king of Arzawa, as Forrer seems to think 97 It is true that Maddu-
wattas unquestionably controlled Arzawa Minor, Hapalla and the territory of
the later state Mira-Kuwaliya. Nevertheless Tarhundaradus - known from the
Arzawa letters in the Amarna Archive -stands a far better chance in my opi-
nion 98 The existence of this king is of considerable interest, since it seems to
91 For a localization of Arzawa :JYiinor in the Caystros Valley, see Giiterbock, Istanb. Mitt. XVII
(1967), p. 70. See CorneliUB, Geographie, p. 394 ff. and Garstang-Gurney, Geography, pp. 83-100 for
arguments in favour of the identifications of Arzawa with Lydia and of Apasa with Ephesos.
92 Friedrich, Staatsv. I, p. 49.
93 The river Seha is mentioned in XXIII 11 II : 4 (Cat. 85.2). In later times Seha river land is in
contact with Ahhiyawa. For a localization in the Maeander Valley, see Giiterbock, Istanb. Mitt. XVII
(1967), p. 70.
94 Goetze, Kleinasien2, p. 179.
95 Forrer, Klio XXX (1937), p.178 ff. basing hhnselfmainly on the passage in the AlaksandlLS treaty,
Staatsv. II, p. 70 ff., par. 17.

96 Cf. XXIII 11 II : 3, 4 and 6 (Cat. 85.2).
97 See Forrer, Klio XXX (1937), p. 167 :ff.
98 EA no. 31 = VBoT 1 : 2 (Cat. 117.1 = MIO IV (1956), p. 334).
indicate that with respect to Arzawa at least one generation of rulership separates
the reign of Arnuwandas from the time of Suppiluliumas.
.At the time of the campaigns described in Cat. 85.2 (XXIII 11 II : 13 ff.) the
coalition of .Assuwa 99 apparently was a second western adversary. The land of
.Assuwa mentioned in II : 33 seems to comprise all the countries enumerated in
the preceding lines, Huwallusiya 100 , Kar(a)kisa 101, Wilusiya 1 2 and Tarwisa 1os
are also known from other material, either from other cuneiform texts or from
later place names in Greek script which are supposed to be related to them. There-
fore they are most noteworthy in this list.
Next to Arzawa and .Assuwa, Lukka 104 is a third important factor on the west
coast of .Asia Minor. .Agajn we are faced by a difference in terminology. Next
to Lukka the Lukka lands also occur. But while many scholars always speak
about the Lukka lands in the plural, it has escaped attention that this plural
is in fact rather rare. I have only found it in XXI 6 +
6 a, a portion of the annals
of Hattusilis Ill (Cat. 72) 1os. The Lukka lands are also indirectly referred to in
99 Assuwa is mentioned in XXIII 11 II: 33; Ill: 5, 9 (Cat. 85.2), XXIII l4ll: 9 (Cat. 86) and XIII
9 + XL 62 I: 2 (Cat. 172). It recurs in the much later letter XXVI 91 I: 14 (Cat. 124.25), for which
see Forrer, RLA I, pp. 56-57 and So=er, A U, pp. 268-269. For a fourth example see XXXIV 43 :
lO (cf. also Awa(rna) in line 5). For a localization in the northwest of Asia Minor, see e.g. Forrer, RLA I,
p. 227, Bossert, Asia, passim, and Garstang-Gurney, Geography, pp. 105-107.
100 Huwallusiya is mentioned in XXIII 11 II : 15 (Cat. 85.2). In XXIII 49 : 4 the town is mentioned
in the direct vicinity of Arzawa in line 7 (cf. Meriggi, Fragmente, pp. 78-79). From Harziuna Mursilis
+
II sends a general out to Huwal(l)usiya (KBo XIV 20 I: 22-23 = JNES XXV (1966), pp. 170 and 178).
11 Kar(a)kisa is mentioned in XXIII 11 II : 16 (Cat. 85.2), XXIII 21 Ill : 30 (Cat. 86) and in Mad-
duwattas, Rev. : 81 (Cat. 89). It has been thought to be identical with Karkiya as mentioned in the
''Fremdlander Liste" KBo II 9 + XV 35 I : 36 (Cat. 406). For the localization of Karkisa in the north-
west, see Garstang-Gurney, Geography, p. 108. In later texts Karkisa is mentioned in connection with
Masa and Lukka.
102 This place name occurs in XXIII 11 II : 19 (Cat. 85.2), and the closely related form Wilusa can
be found in the "Fremdlander Liste" of Cat. 416, XV 38 I : 9. In later times Wilusa occurs in the
Alaksandus treaty (passim) and in the Tawagalawa letter (XIV 3 IV : 8 = Cat. 51 = Sommer, A U,
'PP 16-17). For a northwestern localization, see Cornelius, Geographie, p. 396, and Garstang-Gurney,
Geography, pp. 101-105 (the similarity to Greek Ilios was noted in 1924 by both Goetze and Kretschmer).
See, too, p. 77.
103 The identification with Greek Troy was first proposed by Forrer, MDOG 63 (1924), p. 6. See now
Garstang-Gurney, Geography, pp. 105-106.
104 The country of Lukka is named in XXIV 4 + XXX 12 Obv. : 27 (Cat. 283 C) and in KBo XI
40 VI : 21 (Cat. 533). The name has been restored in XXIII ll II : 14 (Cat. 85.2), but see in this respect
Garstang-Gurney, Geography, p. 106. See also later texts and the following note.
105 In XXI 6 Rev. : 6 the Lukka lands are followed by the city of Wallarinlma in line 7. Hattusilis'
text implies that a dangerous enemy overran a great deal of the southwest of Asia Minor. Mter the
Lukka lands have twice been mentioned in XXI 6 a Rev. : 3, 4, the text continues after a paragraph-
IDSTORICAL CONSIDERATIONS 73
the Tawagalawa letter, but the term itself is only implied and not actually men-
tioned in the extant parts of the text 106 Everywhere else, however, the singular
Lukka is used. Already some years ago Otten gave as his opinion that a Hittite
text quoted below points to a northwestern location of the country of Lukka 10 7
Recently Macqueen assembled more evidence in support of this thesis 1os. Per-
sonally I am not convinced nor am I willing to abandon the traditional equation
with the south-west, be it either Classical Lycia or Lycaonia, or as a vague desig-
nation the combination of both, i.e. the southwest in general. But it should be
conceded that recent studies 1 0 9 brought impressive evidence for the thesis that
Karkisa and Masa 110 should be located more to the north than was formerly
thought.
In a broader context two points call for special comment, first the very specific
terminology for vassalage used in these texts. To make someone linkiyassas,
"of his oath", and the verbs link-, linkanu-, linkanusk-, all occur frequently.
"A man of the oath" seems to designate the formalliegeman 111 , while the adjec-
tive kuriwanas denotes a type of dependency with greater freedom, a kind of
protectorate according to Goetze 112 This term kuriwanas is used in Cat. 89
Rev. : 89 for Attarissiya, man of Ahhiya, but also in Cat. 283 0 Obv. : 16 ff.,
where Hurri land/Mitanni, Kizzuwatna and Arzawa are all characterized with
this designation.
In the second place the great number of Hurrian names in the royal family and
the increase in Luwian names among the general population both strike the eye.
It need not surprise us to find many Hurrian and a few Luwian names in Cat. 87
- the treaty with the nobles from Ismerikka -, but the fact is equally true
divider with a long list of towns which have been conquered by the enemy. Some of these towns are
known from other texts and have plausibly been localized in Pisidia (Kuwalapassa = Colbasa, cf.
Garstang-Gurney, Geography, pp. 79, SO and S2) or in Cilicia. I am inclined to think that before and
around 1250 B. C. the term Lukka lands had a wider and more threatening connotation than before.
10 6 The Tawagalawa letter (XIV 3 = Cat. 51) I: I ff., as translated by Gurney in Geography, p. Ill :
"Then[ ...] as went forth and destroyed the city Attarimma and burned it up, even to the wall of the
king's palace. And just as the Lulclca-men had approached ( ?) Tawagalawas and he had come to these
lands, so they approached ( ?) me also and I came down to these lands".
107 Otten, JCS XV (1961), pp. ll2-ll3, cf. below, pp. 75-76.
1os J.G. Macqueen, Anat. Studies XVIII (I96S), p. I69 ff.
109 Cf. Garstang-Gurney, Geography, p. IOS (Karkisa) and Goetze in his review on that book, JCS
XIV (1960), p. 47 (Masa).

llO The catmtry of Masa is mentioned in XXIII 2I II : 23 (Cat. S6) and also in the "Fremdlander
Liste" KBo II 9 + XV 35 I : 37 (Cat. 406) and in its replica XV 34 I : 60 (Cat. 4I6). See also KBo
XI 40 VI : IS (Cat. 533).
l1l Cf. XXIII 6S Rev. : 7, S, 9 (Cat. S7); Madduwattas, Obv. : I3 (Cat. S9).
112 Goetze, Kleina.sien2, p. 9S.
for Cat. 155, not only with respect to the ordinary men and women enumerated
in this land grant decree, but also with respect to the high officials mentioned
in the closing formula 113.
Both onomastic features are attributable to the fact that the cultural, if not
also the political centre of gravity had shifted towards the Hurro-Luwian southeast
of .Analiolia. The Hurrian element in the Hittite Empire formed the subject of
a special study by Giiterbock 11 4, while the importance of the Luwian factor
has been repeatedly stressed by Laroche 115 I agree with Otten and Laroche
where they attribute Cat. 441, 446 and 447, well-known Luwian rituals, to the
S.AL.SUHUR.L.AL Kuwatallas who lived during the second phase of .Arnuwan-
das' reign 11 6 Some Hittite rituals with Luwian interpolations do show archaisms
pointing to the first decennia of the Empire period 117 , while texts which can be
attributed to that period on other grounds do contain Luwian words, although
these are not yet recognizable as such by the use of the gloss sign as a Luwian
marker 118
It is likely that the so-called "Fremdlander Liste" in rituals of the Evocatio

type which enumerate all the countries and towns from which the gods are "at-
tracted" to Hatti land should be dated to this general period 119 Cat. 406 -
113 See Halpazitis, Kariyazitis, Nunzitis, and[ ...] t/sazitis in KBo V 7 Rev. : 51-55 as compared to
Duwas, Hullas, Tarhumimas and Neriq[qailis]. LUGAL-~KAL is ambivalent.
114 Giiterbock, The Hurrian Element in the Hittite Empire, Journal of World History II (1954), p. 383 ff.
115 Most recently in his Resume at the end of Noms des Hittites, p. 363 ff.
116 Cf. Laroche, Noms des Hittites, no. 662.2, following Otten, Zur gramrnatikaz.ischen und lexikalischen
Bestimrnung des Luvischen, Berlin, 1953, p. 91, See e.g. sipanduwani in XXXIV 18 I: 3 (Cat. 446.1) =
Otten, LTU, p. 25.
11 7 See Already Otten as referred to in the preceding note; Carruba, Wisurijanza, passim and espe-
cially p. 56 (using both ma-a-a]J.-IJ.a-an and the -wani endings as criterion); A. Kammenhuber, Arier,
p. 101 note 3ll (on the basis of ma-a-alJ.-IJ.a-an).
118 See Kammenhuber, ZA LVII N.l!'. 23 (1965), p. 201 for tiwari- in the "Familienzwist" Ritual,
XXXII ll5 + IV : 17 (Cat. 321 II A) = KBo II 3 Ill : 40 (Cat. 321 I A) = ]}fiO I (1953), pp. 364-
365. See also Laroche, DLL, p. 98 under tiwali-. Perhaps one could also point to Tunnawi, IV : 13
(Goetze-Sturtevant, Tunnawi = American Oriental Series vol. XIV, New Haven, 1938, p. 22) IJ.ar-
tu-u-wa-IJ.ar-tu-wa-ti, and to XVII 10 IV : 33, tu-u-ma-an-ti-ia-as (Cat. 258 I A), see above, p. 55.
11 9 Large parts of Cat. 406 were edited by 1!'. So=er, ZA XXXIII (1921), p. 85 ff. See especially
-us as ace. plur. comm. gender of the Enclitic pronvun in XV 35 + KBo IT 9 I: 55. Cat. 416, as edited
by L. Zuntz, Atti del Reale Istituto Veneto di Scienze, Lettere ed Arti XCVI (1936-1937), p. 477 ff.,
shows a number of Middle Hittite traits: see e.g. i-en-zi and ti-i-e-ez-zi, sumenzan, -us as ace. plur.
eo=. gender of the Enclitic pronoun, and above all the typical endings -wani and -tani in istamastani
and IJ.uittiyanniskiuwani. See also IJ.uittiyanniskiuwani and talleskiuwani in the related text Cat.
417, XV 32 I: 50-51 (but note mukisgaueni in line 52!). See also Cat. 319, VII 8 II: 20, mu-ke-es-ki-
u-a-ni. This is a fourth ritual of the same type. All four are enumerated and studied by Laroche, La
Priere Hittite, pp. 24-27.
ritual and prayer to IStar of Niniveh - presupposes Hurrian mediation. Cat.

416 has a distinctly Hurrian background, witness the Cedar-gods, the mention
of Arrapha and Kinahhi, the Hurrian name for Canaan. Cat. 417 was originally
written down by a scribe Hattusilis - under dictation of the king himself -
and the name of this scribe recurs in ABoT 65, a letter showing many archaisms
and also mentioning the scribe Armazitis, known from Cat. 179.6 120 Numerous
geographical items for Asia Minor itself as mentioned in these rituals curiously
remind us of the historical texts for this period :
A (Cat. 406 = XV 35 +
KBo II 9 I : 35 ff.), ...... , Kummaha, Hayasa, ...... ,
Karkiya (Karkisa ( ~)), Arzawa, ...... , Masa, Kuntara, ...... , Ura, Luhma, ...... ,
Partahuina 121 , Gassula, ..... .
B (Cat. 416 = XV 34 I : 58 ff. = XV 38 : 6 ff.), ...... , Kummaha, [Hayas]a, Lul-
luwa, Arzawa, ...... , Dalauwa, Ma[sa], [(Galkisa)], [Kunt]ara, Iyalanti, [(Wilusa)J,
[Ura], Luhma, S[(appuwa)] 122, [Partahuina], Gassula, Hi[muwa], [(Lalha)], ...... ,
[(Gasga)].
A memory of Tudhaliyas II's impressive conquests and an important jndication

towards the Luwian background of this perhaps itself Hurrian dynasty may be
found in the religious text Cat. 533. To an enumeration of KAL-and Ala-deities
are added "all the mountains of whole Hatti land, through which His Majesty
Tudhaliyas (roamingly) campaigns, all the mountains of Hatti land, through
which His Majesty Tudhaliyas, Great King, (roamingly) hunts, all the mountains
of the Upper Country, through which His Majesty (roamingly) hunts, ...... (the
river) Mala (= Euphrates), ...... (the river) Mammaranda, ...... (the river) Gur-
maliya, ...... all the mountajns and all [the rivers] of Hurri land, through which
[His Majesty] (roamingly) hunts, ...... all [the mountains] and all the rivers [of
the land] Arzawa, through which His Majesty [(roamingly) hun]ts, ...... moun-
tains and rivers [of the land] Masa, through which His Majesty [(roamingly)
h]unts, ...... mountains and rivers [of the land] Lukka, through which His Ma-
120 Armazitis was a scribe during the reign of Arnuwandas I, cf. KBo XVI 27 III : 12 (Cat. 179.6).
Perhaps he is also mentioned in the library catalogues XXX 54 II: 8 (Cat. 188.17) and XXX 40 ll?:
6 (Cat. 188.ll), but see Laroche, Noms des Hittites, no. 141.2 for other scribes of this name. In ABoT
65 (Cat. 121) both scribes may be mentioned in the same context. Typical forms in this letter are the
following : ta-pa-as-si-i-e-et, ar-sa-ni-e-se, ne-e-a-ri and :gar-wa-ni. Is it possible that the letter goes
back to the Early Empire period ?
121 See for this place name Forrer, BLA I, p. 429 : "selbstandiger, in der Fremdlanderliste genannter
Staat, dessen Name sich m.E. in Parthenia, jetzt Bartin in Bithynien, erhalten hat".
1 22 According to Goetze, JCS XIV (1960), p. 46, Sappuwa is identical with Sappa mentioned in XXVI
24 I: 5 (Cat. 175 C, i.e. in the version meant for Kissiya), and- much later- in the "Apology" of
Hattusilis ill, II : 60. A western localization follows from this second passage, cf. Goetze, I.e.
jesty [(roamingly) hu]nts, ...... [mountains] and rivers of the land Gasga, through
which [His Majesty] (roamingly) hunts" 1 2 3.
From an historical mewpoint the proposed regrouping has much to recommend

it. In fact, the linguistic approach as given in Chapter I, the philological data
of Chapter Ill, and the historical considerations of this Chapter all concur in
their conclusions : the texts of groups B and 0 belong together ; combined they
fit in excellently between the Old Hittite texts and the texts of Suppiluliumas I.
Professor Otten's recent monograph Die hethitischen historischen Quellen und die
altorientalische Ohronologie, in which he proposes to eliminate Hattusilis II and
Tudhaliyas Ill altogether, was published during the final phase of this study.
Otten's reasoning was prompted- at least in part- by the fact that the Hittite
offering-lists for the royal ancestors only allow for one Tudhaliyas and one Arnu-
wandas, omitting Hattusilis altogether 124 His conclusion only influenced the
manner of presentation in this last, historical Chapter. I am very happy that
Otten's reasoillng - set in motion perhaps by ills linguistical considerations
as referred to in the Introduction 125 - is in good conformity with a high dating
for the texts of group 0. It should be added immediately that this study itself
was defiilltely influenced by those very first hints on the part of Professor Otten
and the Marburg School in general. But perhaps I may also stipulate that the
high dating of this group of texts- in the way it is presented here, or, as it may
be formulated by others - is not dependent on a complete verification of all
the details of Professor Otten's reconstruction. The texts dealt wibh in my study
belong to the early Empire age and there still remains a gap to be filled between
the period reflected in them and the beginning of Suppiluliumas' reign.
When one seriously considers this new dating for these texts as a whole, it becomes
necessary of course to find new answers to questions hitherto answered on the
basis of the traditional chronology. Most difficult perhaps will be to explain the
background of the indictment of Madduwattas, since this new dating will inemta-
bly have repercussions for the Ahhiyawa problem.
In his commentary on the historical implications of Oat. 88 (Mita of Pahhuwa)

Gurney justly remarked that the absence of the names of Azzi and Hayasa from
that text is striking : "For we know that from the time of Suppiluliuma to that
of Tudhaliya IV the principality of Azzi-Hayasa was one of the more important
123 Cf. IT 1 VI and the new text KBo XI 40 VI, cf. Otten, JCS XV (1961), pp. 112-113, and Laroche,
OLZ LVIII (1963), c. 247.
124 See Otten's very helpful synopsis in MDOG 83 (1951), p. 63 and now also Quellen, p. 27 Tabelle Ill.
125 See above, p. 2.
powers with which the Hittite kings had to deal : the city of Dukkamma was one
of its strongest fortresses. Yet a man from Dukkamma appears here as one of
the contracting parties ...... " Gurney concludes : "It seems reasonable to infer
that at this period the kingdom of Azzi-Hayasa had broken up into a number of
smaller units" 126 We now know that Hayasa does occur in another text of this
general period 127 Our conclusion must be that apparently Dukkamma did not
yet belong to Hayasaean territory. The introductory phrases to Suppiluliumas'
treaty with Huqqanas from Hayasa support the thesis that the state of Hayasa
grew out of a comparatively loose confederation 128
We know from that same treaty that a certain Mariyas, who came from the
same region, had been severely punished for his improper conduct at the Hittite
court. Because he had dared to look at a SAL.SUHUR.LAL - a palace woman -
and had been caught at it by His Majesty's father, he was put to death 129 This
may mean that just like in the case of Arzawa (Tarhundaradus) also for Hayasa
at least one generation of rulership between Arnuwandas and Suppiluliumas
seems a distinct possibility : it is indeed striking that Mariyas plays no role in
Arnuwandas' texts. The same conclusion also holds for Kizzuwatna, since Padda-
tissus and Talzus belong between Sunassuras I and Sunassuras II, or - to be
even more precise - between the moment Kizzuwatna shifted allegiance to
Hurri land and the time of Suppiluliumas I 1ao.
As has already been noted by Gurney, a treaty also gives independent support
for the attribution of Cat. 85 to Tudhaliyas II 131 In the customary prologue to
Muwatallis' treaty with Alaksandus of Wilusa (often identified with Ilios), it is
told that when Tudhaliyas campaigned in Arzawa he did not enter into Wilusa,
because this country remained loyal and repeateclly sent messengers to the Hittite
king. There is a problem, however, because the passage in Tudhaliyas' annals
does mention Wilusiya and Tarwisa (usually taken for Troy) as belonging to the
vast group of hostile countries 132 I do not think that one should try to remove
this contradiction by separating Wilusa from Wilusiya. The two names form a
pair on the same footing as Huwalusa and Huwal(l)usiya, the first denoting the
126 Cf. Gurney, AAA XXVIII (1948), pp. 45-46.

127 Cf. KBo XVI 45 Obv. : 3, 4.
128 Friedrich, Staatsv. II, p. 106, par. l.
129 Friedrich, Staatsv. II, p. 128, par. 32.
13 Cf. Landsberger, JCS VIII (1954), p. 50 and Goetze, JCS XI (1957), p. 72. Gurney, GAH fasc. 44,
p. 30 thinks that Paddatissus and Talzus belong between Arnuwandas I and Suppiluliumas (contem
porary with Sunassuras II).
131 Cf. Gurney, GAH fasc. 44, p. 20 on account of Friedrich, Staatsv. II, pp. 50-53, par. 2.
132 XXIII 11 II : 19 (Cat. 85.2).
town and the second the surrounding country 133 Either one of the two accounts
is incorrect, or else the town remained loyal, while the country around it rebelled.
More important, perhaps, is Edmund Gordon's observation that the appearance

of a king of the Hurrians in Tudhaliyas' annals (Cat. 85.2) would have been an
impossibility at the time of Tudhaliyas IV, when the kingdom of Mitanni had
been destroyed and its territory incorporated into the Empire of Assyria 134
This also applies to XXIII 16 (Cat. 123.8), a small enigmatic text written by a
presumably later king Tudhaliyas from the time before Suppiluliumas (see also
Cat. no 171.3 as (arche)type for Cat. 170, military instructions of a king Tud-
haliyas, Cat. no. 178.1 and perhaps also 179.9). The king who wrote this text
mentions his father (III : 2) and the general Kantuzzilis (III : 5, 7). In this text
the Hurrians are repeatedly mentioned and one of the enemies bears the beautiful
Indo-Aryan name of Kartasuras 1 35.
I have already referred to those texts which bear testimony to the decline of the
Hittite power during the later years of Arnuwandas. It seems likely that the
loss of Nerik in particular was felt as a major disaster. Another group of mainly
secondary sources -traditionally connected with Tudhaliyas III but according
to Otten's hypothesis relevant to Arnuwandas I - bespeaks of even greater
difficulties. An often quoted, late text of Hattusilis III - Cat. 58 - describes
how enemies from all sides advanced against the Hittite inner country and how
eventually Hattusas, the capital itself, was burned down with the exception of
the Mausoleum ( ~). The Gasgaeans penetrated unto Nenassa. The Arzawaean
enemy set his boundary at the towns of Tuwanuwa and Uda. The foe from Ara-
wanna sacked the whole country of Gassiya. The Azzian foe destroyed the
upper country and reached Samuha. The enemy from Isuwa sacked the country
of Tegarama. The foe from Armatana set his bo1mdary at Kizzuwatna, the city 136
Gii.terbock has shown that some of these enemies (the Gasgaeans, Arzawa, Ara-
wanna and Azzi) are mentioned in the second and third tablet of the "Deeds"
as foes against whom Suppiluliumas and his father had to fight 137 A passage
133 Cf. the writer, JNES XXV (1966), pp. 170 and 186.
134 See Gordon's point ad given by Gurney, GAH fasc. 44, p. 20. But it should not be forgotten that
kings of Isuwa are mentioned in 13th century texts, cf. H. Klengel in his article Die H ethiter und I suwa,
Oriens Antiquus VII (1968), pp. 63-76 on p. 70 ff. For Assyria's annexation of the Mitannian territory,
see - most recently - Otten, AfO XXII (1968-1969), pp. 112-113.
135 With respect to this name, see Landsberger, JCS VIII (1954), p. 130, and A. Malamat, JNES
XIII (1954), p. 239. But note the contrary opinion of Ka=enhuber, Arier, pp. 63, 92 and 172.
136 KBo VI 28 Obv. : 6-15 = Goetze, Kizzuwatna., pp. 21-22.
137 Giiterbock, JCS X (1956), pp. 119-120.
ffiSTORICAL CONSIDERATIONS 79
in Mursilis' Ten Years Annals recalls how in the time of his grandfather a Gas-
gaean nation stationed in the Tarikarimu mountains threatened the capital1 38 .
Two other passages in texts from the t.ime of Mursilis II - one in the "Deeds"
and the other in his First Plague Prayer - have been adduced to prove that
the capital itself was endangered 139 . .A far echo of this event is discernible in one
of the .Arzawa letters found in the .Amarna .Archive 140 . I am inclined to think
that the events which have been attributed above to the later years of .Arnu-
wandas led up to this still more critical situation in the years before Suppiluliumas'
accession to the throne.
Perhaps it may deemed appropriate to end this Chapter with a short evaluation
of Tudhaliyas' importance as a Hittite king. The beginning of his career led to
a first important break-through after a long period of internal strife which had
been attended by a complete inactivity on the international field. His reign
marked the beginning of an important and lasting Hurrian impact on the Hittite
civilization. .Although it eventually proved impossible to maintain the vast
empire that had been conquered, he unquestionably was one of the greatest
Hittite kings. It seems highly likely that it was mainly due to his example that
Suppiluliumas strove to re-enter the Syrian scene and to make Hattusas one of
the great powers of the rich .Amarna .Age.
138 KBo Ill 4 ITI : 57 ff. = Goetze, AM, pp. 80-81.

139 See von Schuler, Die Kalkiier, p. 34 together with notes 181 and 183, referring to Goetze KIF I
(1928), p. 166 ff., par. 4, and Giiterbock, "Deeds", fr. 11 II: 8 ff. = JCS X (1956), p. 64.
140 EA no. 31 = VBoT 1 : 25-27 (Cat. 117.1) = MIO IV (1956), pp. 335, 336 and 338. The passage
has recently been translated by Giiterbock, RHA fasc. 81 (1967), p. 145 : (The Pharaoh of Egypt to
the king of Arzawa) "I have heard (that) everything (is) finished! And the land of Hattusa, too, has
gone to pieces!" See also Neu, Interpretation, p. 69 note 15.
Appendix A:
LIST OF CATALOGUE NUMBERS

FOR THE MIDDLE HITTITE TEXTS
Cat. 85 Annals of Tudhaliyas 1 : XXIII 27

2 : XXIII 11 (A) and 12 (B).
This composition was edited by R. Ranoszek, Rocznik Or. IX
(1933), p. 50 ff. In my opinion one text may be added to this number :
XXIII 36 (Cat. 123.11) + XXXI 35 (Cat. 153). This join was made
by Meriggi, Fragmente, p. 83. In column II the text describes the
first penetration of a Hittite king to an unnamed sea (cf. Meriggi,
I.e., p. 82). In column Ill the same or another sea is mentioned,
in this case most probably the Black Sea. XXIII 16 might stem
from a later king Tudhaliyas of the period before Suppiluliumas.
The king's name is Tudhaliyas (Ill : 13) and he mentions his father
(Ill : 2). The general Kantuzzilis is mentioned (Ill : 5) and there
are references to the Hurrians (one of them bears the name of Kar-
tasuras !). For a similar ascription see already Laroche, Catalogue,
under no. 123.8.
Cat. 86 Annals of Arnuwandas : XXIII 21 (= VI 49).
See A. Goetze, Madduwattas, p. 156 ff. and Kizzuwatna, p. 56 ff.
I have added XXIII 14 (repeatedly added to this composition by
other scholars since Bossert, Asia, p. 26), XXIII 116 (Cat. 123.14;
see already Goetze, RLA I, p. 153 and, more recently, Meriggi,
Fragmente, p. 80), XXI 10 (Cat. 41.50) and 97/c (for these texts
see "Deeds" fr. 50-51 = JCS X (1956), p. 117 ff.; see already Laroche,
Noms des Hittites, p. 123 under no. 837.1), KBo XII 35.
Possible candidates for either Cat. 85 or 86 are rather numerous,

cf. XXIII 18 (Cat. 123.9), XXIII 26 (Cat. 123.10), XXIII 49 (Cat.
123.12), XXIII 59 (Cat. 123.13) and XXIII 63 (Cat. 135).
Cat. 87 Treaty with Nobles from Ismerikka : XXIII 68 (+) XXVI 41 +
ABoT 58. See R. Ranoszek, Cr. Societe des Sciences et Lettres
de Varsovie XXXII (1939) I, p. 25 ff. and A Goetze, Kizzuwatna,
p. 44 ff.
Cat. 88 Mita of Pahhuwa : XXIII 72 + XL 10 (and 11 ?).
LIST OF CATALOGUE J\Tffi\'I:BERS 81
See O.R. Gurney, AAA XXVIII (1948), pp. 32-47.

For this join see above, p. 5.
Cat. 89 Madduwattas : XIV 1.
See A. Goetze, Madduwattas, MVAeG 32.1 (1927).
Cat. 94 Treaty of a Hittite king with king Sunassuras (I~) of Kizzuwatna :
VIII 81 (Laroche Cat. 36.2 B) and XXXVI 127.
See A. Goetze, ZA XXXVI N.F. 2 (1925), pp. 11-18 and H. Pet-
schow, ZA LV N.F. 21 (1962), p. 242 ff. I have dealt with this com-
position above on pp. 44, and 60.
Cat. 95 Treaty with the Gasgaeans : XXIII 77 a (+) XIII 27 + XXIII
77 +XXVI 40.
For translation and commentary, see E. von Schuler, Die Kaskiier,
p. 117 ff.
Cat. 96 Treaty with the Gasgaeans : A KBo VIII 35
B1 XXIII 78 + XL 36
B2 XXVI 6
C KBo XVI 29
D XXXI 104.
The last two tablets are parallel versions (see above, p. 41).
For translation and commentary, see E. von Schuler, Die Kaskiier,
p. 109 ff.
Cat. 97 Fragments of treaties with the Gasgaeans : 1 = XXVI 19 (see von
Schuler, o.c., p. 130 ff.); 2 = XXVI 20 (see von Schuler, o.c.,
p. 140 ff.); 3 =XXXI 33 (see von Schuler, o.c., p. 142); 4 =XXXI
105 (see von Schuler, o.c., pp. 139-140).
Cat. 99 Treaty of Arnuwandas ( ~) with men from Ura : XXVI 29 + XXXI
55. See H. Klengel, ZA LVII N.F. 23 (1965), p. 223 ff. and especially
pp. 227-228.
Cat. 124.6 Letter ( ~) concerning Kurustama : A KBo VIII 37
B XL 28
In my opinion XL 28 represents another duplicate (see above, p. 6).
Cat. 155 Land grant decree of Arnuwandas and Asmunikal : KBo V 7.
See K. Riemschneider, MIO VI (1958), p. 344 ff.
Cat. 171.3 Military instructions of a king Tudhaliyas : XXVI 17.
This tablet reflects the archetype of Cat. 170 (for which see Laroche,
Catalogue). See S. Alp, Instructions, Belleten XI (1947), fasc. 43,
p. 383 ff.
Cat. 172 Law-text of Tudhaliyas II : XIII 9 + XL 62.
See E. von Schuler, Hethitische Konigserlasse, p. 446 ff.
Cat. 174 Instructions for the Mayor of Hattusas: A XXVI 9
B XXIII 64.
82 THE RECORDS OF THE EARLY ffiTTITE EMPIRE
The following texts may be added : XXXI 112 (cf. Laroche, Oat.
178.12), KBo X 4-5, KBo XIII 58.
See especially H. Otten, Aufgaben eines Bilrgermeisters in Hattusa,
Baghd. Mitt. III (1964), pp. 91-95.
Oat. 175 Treaties with the dignitaries of a number of northern districts
concluded by Arnuwandas and Asmunikal :
A XXXI 44
B XXXI 42
0 XXVI 24 + XL 15.
See E. von Schuler, Wurdentriigereide, Orientalia XXV (1956),
pp. 209-240.
Oat. 176 Instructions for the Commander of the Border Guards. I have
have only included those manuscripts which might belong to the
old recension : E1 XXXI 87 ( +)
E2 XXXI 88( +)
L1 XL 55 (+)
L2 XL 56
M XIII 1
N XL 57.
See E. von Schuler, Hethitische Dienstanweisungen, pp. 36 ff., 59 ff.
and A. Goetze, JOS XIV (1960), pp. 69-71.
Oat. 178.1 Law-text of a king Tudhaliyas : XIII 7.
See E. von Schuler, Hethitische Konigserlasse, p. 458 ff.
Oat. 178.10 Treaty with the external characteristics of a sealed land grant
decree : XXXI 103.
Oat. 179 Protocol for the royal succession : 179.1 XXXIV 40
2 XXXIV 41
3 XXXVI 112
4 XXXVI 113
5 XXXVI 114
6 XXXVI 116
8 XXXVI 118
9 KBo XVI 24 (+) 25.
Oat. 179.6 is in fact another treaty with the Gasgaeans, cf. E. von
+ +
Schuler, Die Ka8kaer, p. 134 ff. :XXXVI 115 117 KBo XVI 27.
Passages from Oat. 179.9 have been dealt with by Sommer-Otten,
OLZ XLVIII (1953), c. 15, E. von Schuler, Wurdertriigereide, p. 217
note 13, H. Kiimmel, Ersatzrituale, p. 43.
Oat. 180.2 Related fragments : 2 XXXVI 119
See H. Otten, MDOG 83 (1951), p. 55 note 7, H. Kiimmel, Ersatz-
rituale, p. 43. Two texts may be added : XXXIV 58 and 203/f
LIST OF CATALOGUE NUl\IIBERS 83
(see above, p. 5). For the former see H. Otten, I.e., and for the
latter, E. Neu, Interpretation, p. 33.
Cat. 275 Prayer of Kantuzzilis : XXX 10.
See A. Goetze, ANETI, pp. 400-401.
Cat. 276 Royal Prayer to the Sun-god: A XXXVI 75
B XXXII +XXXI135(+)XXXI
130
C XXXI 129
D XXXI 128 ( +) 133.
I have followed Giiterbock's suggestion to transpose Cat. 274 C
and B (+) D to Cat. 276, cf. Giiterbock, JAOS LXXVIII (1958),
p. 242 note 27 and in G. Walser, Neuere Hethiterforschung (Wies-
baden, 1964), p. 57 note 17. For this composition and the preceding
one see H.G. Giiterbock, The Composition of Hittite Prayers to the
Sun, JAOS LXXVIII (1958), p. 237 ff.
Cat. 277 Prayer of Arnuwandas and Asmunikal about the disruption of
the cults in the north. For the Computer Project I have adopted
the sigla which von Schuler used in his edition, Die Kaskaer, p. 152 .,
with the following additions given by Professor Giiterbock :
E 398/u + 1945/u
F 1691/u (-uni endings from this manuscript are quoted by Neu,
IF LXXIII (1968, p. 173)
G 1241/u
H 1099/u.
See also Goetze, ANETI, pp. 399-400.
Cat. 283 C A Plague Prayer re-used by Mursilis II :
A XXIV 4 +XXX 12
B KBo VII 63 (I owe the reference to this duplicate found by Laroche
to Professor Giiterbock).
See O.R. Gurney, AAA XXVII (1940), p. 26 ff. (copy D in Gurney's
notation).
Cat. 354.1 Asmunikal on the establishment of a mausoleum : XIII 8.
See H. Otten, Tot., p. 106 ff.
KBo XV 10 Ritual mentioning Tudhaliyas and Nikalmati, to be published in
the near future by Miss G. Szab6.
KBo XVI 31 Fragment of an instruction or treaty.
35 Fragment of an instruction or treaty.
46 Fragment of an instruction or treaty.
47 Treaty of the 15th century B.C. with Huhazalmas, cf. H. Otten,
Istanb. Mitt. XVII (1968), p. 55 ff.
50 Pledge of Allegiance, cf. H. Otten, RHA fasc. 66-67 (1960), p. 121 ff.
Indices
OTHER COMPOSITIONS REFERRED TO IN THIS STUDY
Cat. 117.1 EA 31 = VBoT 1 308 A XXIX 1

2 EA 32 = VBoT 2, 70, 79 B XXIX2
121 ABoT 65, 75 c XXIX 3, 53-55
169 IBoT I 36, 68 310 A KBo VI 34, 70
181.1 A KBo VI 2 319 VII 5 +, 74
B KBo VI 3, 29-31, 35-36, 49, 321 I A KBo II 3
70-71 IIA XXXII 115 +,
36-37
406 A XV 35 + KBo II 9,
74-75
258 I A XVII 10, 31-33, 55-56, 74 416 A XV34
261 C XXXIII 25 +, 31, 55 B XV 33 1 +,
74-75
262.1 XXXIII 15, 33 417 A XV31
2 XXXIII 31, 33 B XV 32, 74-75
274 A XXXI 127 +, 34-35
283 A XXIV 3 +, 33-35
LIST OF PERSONAL NAMES
N.B. The added numbers refer to Laroche, Noms des Hittites.

Armazitis (141.2), 75 Mita (808), 5, 61, 63, 65-66
Arnuwandas (148.2), passim Nikalmati (875), 4, 56
Asmunikal (174), 1, 4, 32, 58, 67 Paddatissus (957), 77
Attarissiya (201), 63-65, 73 Sunassuras If
Harapsili (297.2), 32 Sunassuras II (1178), 5-6, 44, 60, 69, 77
Hattusilis II (349.3), 1, 76 Suppiluliumas I (1185.1), 1, 6, 27, 57,
Hattusilis (349.8), 75 76, 79
Huhazalmas (384), 4, 68 Talzus (1233), 77
Kantuzzilis (503.1), 5, 69, 78, 80 Tarhundaradus (1268), 71, 77
Kartasuras (529), 78, 80 Tudhaliyas II (1389.3), passim
Kupanta-DKAL (635.2), 59, 64 tuhukantis Tudhaliyas (1389.4), 1, 4,
Kuwatallas (662.2), 68, 74 58, 67
Lalantiwahas (681), 5 a king Tudhaliyas (1389.3/4), 6, 38, 62,
Mariyas (762.2), 77 69, 78, 80
Madduwattas (794), 5, 63-65, 69, 71
LIST OF PLACE NAMES
Ahhiya(wa), 63-65, 71, 73, 76 Gasga, 59, 62, 67-68, 75, 78

Alasiya, 65 KjGassiyaj
Alatarma, 65 Kissiya, 67, 68, 69, 70
Aleppo, 59-60 Kastama, 67
Arana, 61 Kinnara, 68, 70
Arawanna, 68, 78 Kizzuwatnaji, 59, 60, 61, 63, 68, 69,
Arhita, 66 73, 77, 78
Arzawa, 58, 62, 63, 64, 68, Kummaha, 66, 68, 75
69, 70-72, 73, 75, Kuruppiya, 58, 59
78, 79 Kurustama, 6
Assaratta, 59 Kuwalapassa, 64, 73
Assuwa, 5, 59, 62, 72 Kuwali(ya}, 64, 71
Adaniya, 59 Lukka, 64, 65, 68, 72-73, 75
Attarimma, 65, 73 Lusa, 58, 59
Awarna, 64, 72 Mala, 75
Hapalla, 64, 71 Maltiya, 4, 62, 65
Hariyati, 63 Masa, 59, 64, 72, 73, 75
HAR-ranassa, 68, 70 Mira, 64, 71
Hayasa, 66, 75, 76-77 Mitanni, 59-60, 61, 63, 69, 73
Himuwa, 67, 70, 75 Mutamutassaj
Hinzuta, 65 Mutamutasi, 65
Hurri land, 4, 59, 61, 62, 63, 65, 68, 69, Nerik, 67
73, 75 Pahhuwa, 4, 5, 61, 63, 65, 66
Hursanassa, 65 Parsuhaltaj
Huwalusa, 77-78 Pasuhalta, 58, 59
Huwal(l)usiya, 72, 77-78 Partahuina, 75
Irritaje, 61, 63 Pitassa, 65, 68, 69
Iismerikka, 5, 61, 63, 73 Pittiyarik, 5, 62, 65
Isuwa, 59, 61, 62, 63, 65, 66, Samuha, 62, 69, 78
67, 70, 78 Sajipidduwa, 67
Iyalanda, 64, 65, 75 Sappaj
Kalasma, 68, 70 Sappuwa, 75
Kar(a)kisa, 58, 59, 72, 73, 75 Seha river land, 71
INDICES 87
Sinnuwanda, 59 Urussa, 61
Siyanta river, 64 Waliwantaj
Suhrna, 61, 62, 63, 65 Uliwanta, 58
Sullarna, 65-66 Wallarirnrna, 65, 72
Suruta, 65 Washaya, 67
Dala(u)wa, 64, 75 Wassukannaji, 61
Tarukka, 67 W attarusna, 66
Tarwisa, 72, 77 Wilusa, 71, 72, 75, 77-78
Tegararna, 67, 70, 78 Wilusiya, 72, 77-78
Terussa, 61 Zazlippaj
Tirnrniya, 66 Zizzilippa, 61
Dukkarnrna, 66, 77 Zihhana, 67
Dukkarnrnana, 66 Zippasla, 63, 64
Ura I, Zunnahara, 59
Ura II, 68, 75
HAY ASA
PARTAHUINA
UPPER
COUNTRY AZZI
0
Hattusa
SUHMA
Pahhuwa
0
ASSUWA
Tegarama
0
LOWER
COUNTRY 0
ZIPPASLA Maltiya HURRI
Tuwanuwa
0
PIT ASS A
seha R.
Sinnuwanda
LUKKA 0
0
Kargamis
0
Aleppo
100mi

PIHANS026

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

PIHANS026

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

PIHANS026

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

PIHANS XXVI

The Records of the Early Hittite Empire

Nederlands Instituut voor het Nabije Oosten

Publications de l'institut historique et archeologique de Stamboul

THE RECORDS OF THE E.ARLY HITTITE EMPIRE

PHILO H.J. HOUWINK TEN CATE

AU rights reserved, including the right to translate or

.Appendix .A List of Catalogue Numbers for the Middle Hittite Texts. 80

This study is a first result of the Computer Project as undertaken by Professor

Perhaps I may add a note of warning. All I have attempted to do is to make a

Amsterdam, Mei 1969 Philo H.J. HouwiNK TEN CATE

In general I have adhered to the systems used by either Friedrich (Hethitisches

AAA Annals of Archaeology and Anthropology, Liver-

Cornelius, Fr., Geographie Geographie des Hethiterreiches, Orientalia XXVII

JCS Journal of Cuneiform Studies, New Haven,

MSS - Miinchener Studien zur Sprachwissenschaft,

Sommer, F., AU - Die A!J!JiJava-Urkunden, Abh. d. Bayr. Aka-

5 Cf. von Schuler, Die Ka8kaer, p. 113 note 13.

(1968), p. 169 ff.

In order to explain a number of archaic traits, e.g. in the indictment of Maddu-

compositions which in my opinion should be considered as Middle Hittite (in

A. Old Hittite texts (corpus constituted by Professor Giiterbock).

12 Bibliographical references are given in Appendix A.

If the texts of group C - the disputed group - are really to be classified as

I am not yet completely convinced by the Luwian explanation of the -wanif-uni

"Old Script" -wanij-unij-mani -wenij-meni -tani -teni

Group B -wanif-uni/-mani -wenij-meni -tani -teni

Group 0 -wani /-uni /-mani -wenij-meni -tani -teni

In a separate chart I have added a number of internal correspondencies (simi-

With respect to Column A the following numbers require an explanation :

nu-uk-kan : 6; 324 nu-uk-ka[n]: 179.5

ki-i-nu-ud-du : 275 (but also

ka-a-as : 88; 95 (but also ka-a-sa)

mi-im-ma-as : 89 But note mi-im-ma-as in 47

sa-a-ku-it : 88 (but also sa-a-ku-wa : 36.2 B (= 94 and C ?)

1) Nom.jacc. plur. in -es

da-a-ir : 85; 89; 171.3

3) 2. pers. plur. gen. Pers. pron. :

4) 3. pers. plur. nom. Dem.JPers.

6) dat. sing. Enclitic Pers. pron. :

4 See already Carruba, Verbalendungen, pp. 85-86 for this criterion.

-e: 172 (?) -at: 33 B

-e : 176 B (ne-et-ta) -e : 38 (ne-et-ta); until the young-

-mi- : 85; 86; 88; 89; 124.6 -mi-: 38

i-e-et : 5; 6; 21.2; 24 nu-un-tar-ri-id-du : 179.9

ku-i-us : 88 (cf. ku-i-us-ga in ku-i-e-es : 35 B

:Q_ar-wa-ni: KBo XVI 50

ku-e-u-e-en: KBo XVI 47 9

16) 3rd pers. sing. Preterite :gi- conj. :the

8 Cf. Carruba, Die I. und 11. Pers. Plur., p. 18 note 10 a.

18) Verbs in -a:g_:Q_- :

19) nai- Jpai- jtai- : n

10 See So=er, HAB, p. 222.

M: 85; 88; 89; (97.1); M: 171.5

2nd pers. sing. Preterite

3rd pers. sing. Preterite

poss. pron. : passim

pa-it-ta : 89 Murs. : pa-is-ta Muw. : pe-es-ta

na-is : 89 Murs. : na-es-tajna-is-ta

la-a-a:Q_-:Q_a : 89 Murs. : la:g_:g_i