NON TIMBER FOREST PRODUCT UTILIZATIONS

AND AWARENESS OF SMALL-SCALE INDUSTRY

DEVELOPMENT IN FOREST COMMUNITIES-
A CASE STUDY IN EAST KALIMANTAN

Eli Nur Nirmala Sari1

ABSTRACT

A lack of livelihood to meet the needs has been one reason why forest communities have
utilized non-timber forest products (NTFPs). For some communities living in or around forest
areas, NTFPs have been a basic support for their small-scale industries, which could contribute
to better income. This study focused on the utilization of NTFPs by forest communities and
their awareness in terms of utilizing such products for handicrafts in small-scale industry. This
study examined the NTFPs potentials, markets, and social benefits at the five villages in East
Kalimantan, Indonesia. The villages-surveyed were Batu Lidung, Punan Bengalun, Sesua,
Mendupo, and Seputuk which were located in and near forest areas managed by PT Intracawood
Manufacturing as a forest concessionaire. The method used was Participatory Rural Appraisal
Techniques, and the data collection was based on primary data and household survey. The
result suggested that among the five villages, the most remote area was Punan Bengalun. Forest
community of Punan Bengalun has started selling the handicrafts made from NTFPs only in the
last few years. Among the five villages-surveyed, the forest community in Seputuk tended to be
more active in utilizing NTFPs for small-scale industry rather than those in four other villages.
Awareness in utilizing the NTFPs had been mostly depended on factor of forest distance from the
villages. People living close to the district capital (where there was a wider variety of employment
opportunities) had less motivation to utilize NTFPs although there were available.

Keywords: natural forest, non timber forest products, utilization, awareness

I. INTRODUCTION
Forests contribute significantly in fulfilling the needs of forest communities (Ali et
al., 2007). Evidence from the field indicates that forests and forest communities exist
in a state of symbiosis. Forests supply food, income, medicine, and nutrition through
the materials they produce, and provide shelter (Pierce, 1999), recreation, and safety
for forest communities.
One of the benefits of forests is the availability of natural resources to fulfill the
community needs. Since the introduction of forest concessionaire activities in the 1970s
in Indonesia, the communities have been prohibited from utilizing timber. However,

Graduate School of Environmental Science, Hokkaido University, Japan

1

Email: [email protected]; [email protected]

70
 Non Timber Forest ..... E.N.N Sari

there is still plenty of NTFP utilization in communities - such products are an important
part of their livelihoods (Pierce, 1999). Although many researchers argue that NTFPs
are important for forest communities, the role of these products economically has not
yet been identified. NTFPs in Indonesia have already been exploited and harvested by
forest communities for daily life (Malik and Sumadiwangsa, 2003), but most people
living in or around the forests in Indonesia are still considered poor. The significance
of NTFPs role in forest community economic in Indonesia is not yet known. People
who gather NTFPs usually live in remote areas, and are poor with low formal education
(FAO, 2008). They are forced to fulfill their daily needs from forests, and run their
business by selling the NTFPs, such as fruits and handicrafts made of NTFPs. Forest
communities have started these activities for many years since recognizing currency as
payment for goods and services.
Although it is well known that forests have tremendous potential in providing
NTFPs, some forest communities remain relatively unaware of the economic potential.
Many of them do not have any motivation to utilize the natural resources to increase
their economic status, even though it is known that forest products - especially NTFPs
- can be utilized to make handicrafts and offer opportunities for small-scale industry. In
relation to these opportunities, the impact of product substitution and the possibility
of creating new markets need to be examined, together with the impact of changes
in collection, processing, and marketing patterns. As Tewari and Campbell (1995)
mentioned that price, supply, and demand trends will need to be assessed to determine
medium- and long-term economic viability and the markets absorptive capacity for each
type of NTFP. Forest communities have their own capacity to earn income from the
NTFP sector. However, many factors weaken their desire to build awareness of these
opportunities.
This study examined the NTFPs potentials, markets, and social benefits at the five
villages in East Kalimantan. Komarudin et al. (2007) mentioned that NTFPs could
potentially provide more value over the long term. In terms of the extent to which forest
communities use NTFPs and their awareness of NTFPs utilization to increase income,
this study analyzed the relationships between community forest-related activities and
factors affecting forest dependency to assess whether residents are aware of the potential
of forests and the opportunities to develop small-scale industry. The three goals of this
study were: (1) to identify factors that affect NTFP utilization by forest communities;
(2) to identify small-scale industry related to NTFPs utilization; and (3) to identify the
conditions of business/industry activities and ascertain direction of forest community
development.

71
Journal of Forestry Research Vol. 7 No. 1, 2010: 70-89

II. METHODS

A. Study Site
This study was undertaken in two sub-districts of East Kalimantan Province:
Sesayap, which is located in Bulungan District, and Malinau, which is located in
Malinau District (Figure 1). Within these two sub-districts, three villages in Malinau
(Batu Lidung, Punan Bengalun, and Sesua) and two villages in Sesayap (Mendupo and
Seputuk) were pointed (Table 1). All five villages are located in or near forest areas of
PT. Intracawood Manufacturing2. The five villages were selected because of the effective
nature of collection among the particular communities; and this appeared to influence
activities related to their forest dependence. Large rivers also pass through each of these
villages, which was probably one of the reasons why the communities settled there. Most
of the communities in these five villages were farmers and using rivers for drinking,
washing, and bathing.
Before the political changes in 1998, the old district of Bulungan consisted of three
areas that are now becoming different districts (Palmer, 2004). The Malinau District
was established in 1999, and covers an area of 4,262,000 ha consisting of 98% forest,
and the other 2% is classified as areas for agriculture, mining, and other uses (Suwarno
and Campbell, 2005). The forests in Malinau District are classified as production forests,
conservation forests, and protection forests. They are considered to represent one of
the fifteen tropical rain forest hotspots in the world (Mittermeier and Bowles, 1993).
Bulungan District is in the northern part of East Kalimantan Province, and covers an
area of 1,801,050 ha. There are many small islands in the area within numerous large and
small rivers. Job opportunities in the district are categorized into nine different sectors,
i.e. agriculture, mining, industry, construction, trade, transportation, communications,
finance, and services. The first and second largest sectors are agriculture and trade,
with shares of 68.8 and 9.5%, respectively, and the minority is the service sector, with
a share of only 0.7% (BPS, 2006). The forests cover an area of 1,386,356 ha, which
includes conservation, production, and limited production forests. Forest management

PT. Intracawood Manufacturing is an HPH (Hak Pengusahaan Hutan = forest concession holder)
2

that has operated since 1988 on behalf of state-owned company - PT. Inhutani I (the main HPH
since 1976). PT. Intracawood Manufacturing managed 250,000 hectares of forest at the beginning of
its management, and reduced to 195,000 hectares by August 2003. In 2006, 38 villages were located
in and around the forest area. After establishment of the concession holders in this area in the 1970s,
communities living in or near the forest faced restrictions on the utilization of forest products as
declared in a policy introduced by the HPH. These communities are no longer free to utilize forest
products. This directly or indirectly affects their incomes. Since 1997, the Indonesian Ministry of
Forestry obligated that all concession holders in Indonesia had to offer support and development
to local communities. To date, PT. Intracawood Manufacturing has supported local communities
by providing funds to develop infrastructure and assist local community needs related to education,
health, religion, culture and safety. The establishment of HPHs brings advantages and disadvantages
to such communities.

72
 Non Timber Forest ..... E.N.N Sari

is implemented by forest concession companies, and in 2005 three forest concessionaires

were activated to manage 457,585 ha of forests in Bulungan District (BPS, 2006).

South East Asia

Batu Lidung

Seputuk

Sesua Mendupo
Sesayap sub-district

Punan Bengalun

Malinau sub-district
Source: http//images.google.com (cited on 5 December 2009)

Sekatak sub-district

Malaysia

East Kalimantan
PT Intracawood Mfg. forest area

Legend: Village Natural forest

Sub-district border Plantation forest

Source: PT Intracawood Mfg. 2007

Figure 1. Research site

Table 1. Information of five villages surveyed

Number of
households
Number of house- utilizing NTFPs Distance from village
Number of
holds utilizing to make handi- center to:
households
NTFPs (%) crafts for sale to Year of village (km)
Village District others/markets establishment
(%)
Major con-
Sub-district
1996 2006 1996 2006 1996 2006 sumption
market
goods market
Batu Malinau 90 213 60 18 12 4 1958 3 3
Lidung
Punan Malinau 43 45 100 100 0 55 1975 35 35
Bengalun
Sesua Malinau 120 195 70 42 41 12 1948 22 0
Mendupo Bulungan 65 70 100 95 46 42 1950 35 27
Seputuk Bulungan 50 100 100 100 60 40 1945 45 25

Note: The data were collected from interviews with the chiefs of the five villages surveyed.

73
Journal of Forestry Research Vol. 7 No. 1, 2010: 70-89

B. Data Collection and Analysis

The study was based mainly on primary data, and the other information was
collected through a household survey. The investigation was carried out in March
2008. A stratified sample of households was chosen by performing a census of village
dwellings using Participatory Rural Appraisal Techniques. A questionnaire interview
was implemented with 65 households (13 households for each village) who were active
in utilizing NTFPs and making handicrafts. The samples consisted of 23% male and
77% female. There were more female because they were more active in utilizing NTFPs
and making handicrafts. All the household members surveyed were natives. Pre-testing
questionnaires were given to respondents in the sample villages to test questionnaire
effectiveness. Some questions that were not relevant to the communities context in
the villages were removed, and other new questions were added. To minimize bias,
every completed questionnaire was signed whether it was complete or not. Incomplete
questionnaires were not included in the data analysis. Descriptive analysis was used to
present data of household perceptions toward NTFP utilization and small-scale industry
opportunities.
To achieve the goals of the study, data on the following points were collected: (1)
factors that influence forest community awareness toward NTFP utilization; (2) factors
that influence forest communities to not utilize NTFPs; (3) obstacles faced by forest
communities in utilizing NTFPs; and (4) possible ways to increase forest community
living standards through small-scale industry.

III. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

A. Potential of NTFPs and their Utilization by Forest Communities

After the establishment of the forest concessionaire, the villagers were still allowed to
utilize the NTFPs, such as rattan (used as a tying material in hut or house construction),
medicinal plants, ginseng, latex from poisonous wood used for sumpit (blow gun)
traditional weapons, honey, leaves for rice wrapping, fruits, and animals. In general,
they still utilize the forest as a source of life. However, they have less opportunity to
utilize the timbers in line with regulations introduced by the Indonesian Ministry of
Forestry. This condition has reduced forest community incomes. The same theory was
mentioned by Yasmi (2003), that the dependency of communities on forest has now
decreased in response to a number of factors, including restrictions on the utilization of
forest products by forest managers.
The five villages surveyed - Batu Lidung, Punan Bengalun, Sesua, Mendupo, and
Seputuk - were established in their current locations in 1958, 1975, 1948, 1950, and
1945, respectively (Table 1). Before settlement, there was an abundant supply of forest
products. However, they reported that the availability of these materials after settlement
was lower than that in their previous locations. Moreover, since forest concessionaires

74
 Non Timber Forest ..... E.N.N Sari

became active in forest management in the 1970s, their over harvesting of timber has
reduced the availability of NTFPs (FAO, 1997). In the five villages-surveyed, residents
reported that they had more difficulty to find sources of NTFPs since the establishment
of forest concessionaires. Previously, before the establishment of forest concessionaires,
forest communities could easily find animals for food, gaharu to be sold, fruits, honey,
fish from rivers, and other NTFPs from various sources to meet their needs. In general,
communities living in or near forest areas depend on them for life, especially for food
where it is lacking (Quang and Anh, 2006). However, since the establishment of forest
concessionaire, communities had gradually experienced higher levels of difficulty in
finding resources - especially gaharu3, animals, and fishes - because of the deterioration
of environmental quality. Logging by forest concessionaires had killed off many gaharu
trees, dispersed animal and bee populations, and caused a deterioration of water quality
in rivers passing through forest community settlements. This drop in water quality has
in turn caused a reduction in fish populations.
In the villages-surveyed, the majority of NTFPs for handicrafts that forest
communities used were rattan (Calamus spp.), bamboo (Bambusoideae), pandan
(Pandanus spp.), and silat leaves (Palmae). These NTFPs were used to make handicrafts
such as anjat and bakul (woven basket), mat, winnowing basket, kedabang (head
covering), and bubu (fish trap). Not all of the forest communities in the villages could
produce handicrafts - it is an ability passed down from previous generations. Usually,
villagers who were unable to make such items will order them from other villagers, so
those with the necessary skills could also sell them besides using them to fulfill their own
needs. This demonstrated how handicraft making represents a source of income. The
availability, access, and use of NTFPs in the five villages-surveyed are shown in Table
2. In most of the villages, it was found that the availability of NTFPs was high in 1990
and decreased in 2008. In some villages, although the availability of NTFPs in forests
was decreasing and access to find them had become difficult, villagers still fulfilled their
needs independently by planting NTFPs on their own agricultural land or in their home
gardens. In Seputuk Village, most residents planted rattan, bamboo, and pandan to
support their material needs for making handicrafts. The sources of handicraft materials
and the utilization of the products manufactured are shown in Table 3. Meanwhile, Table
4 listed the activities of handicraft making by the 65 households interviewed, and shows
the purpose of production. However, some communities sold their products to other
villagers and to the market. Some were also found to buy products from other villagers
even though they were capable of making them by themselves. The ownership of money
by some communities was one of the reasons why they prefered to buy those products
rather than produced them by themselves.

Gaharu is a fragrant resin created from fungal infection of Aquilaria spp., commonly known as gaharu
3

trees (Limberg et al., 2005). Gaharu collectors sell the resin to buyers or traders, who then export it to
Middle Eastern countries. As gaharu has now decreased (Levang et al., 2005), the number of gaharu
collectors has decreased.

75
Journal of Forestry Research Vol. 7 No. 1, 2010: 70-89

Table 2. NTFP utilization by forest communities (results of interview from 65

households in the five villages surveyed)

Rattan Bamboo Silat leaves Pandan

No. Village surveyed
1990 2008 1990 2008 1990 2008 1990 2008
1 Batu Lidung Availability + x + x + x + x
Access + x + x x x + x
Use x - x - - - x -
2 Punan Availability + + + + + + + +
Bengalun
Access + + + + + + + +
Use + + x x + + + +
3 Sesua Availability + x x x x x + x
Access x x x - x x x x
Use x - - - - - x x
4 Mendupo Availability + + + + + + + +
Access + + + + + + + +
Use + + + + x x + +
5 Seputuk Availability + + + + + + + +
Access + x + x + + + x
Use + + + + + + + +
Availability: "+" = plentiful, "x" = sufficient, "-" = less
Access: "+" = easy, "x" = medium, "-" = difficult
Use: "+" = plentiful, "x" = sufficient, "-" = less

76
 Non Timber Forest ..... E.N.N Sari

Table 3. Handicraft making from NTFPs by forest communities in the five villages
surveyed (n = 65): production by gender and material sources
Gender (%) Handicrafts made from NTFPs Material sources Average amounts of material needed
Male1 Female2 Product Use Material 1990 2007 S M L

30
Woven Firewood 20 sticks x 25 sticks x sticks
100% 10% Rattan
basket container 1 meter 1 meter x1
meter
(Anjat)
Forest,
agricultural
30
land
Woven Rice Forest 20 sticks x 25 sticks x sticks
7% 100% Rattan in
basket container, 1 meter 1 meter x1
secondary
meter
crop forest areas
(Bakul)
container,

2 sticks
Winnowing Winnowing 2 sticks x 2 sticks x 1
0 100% Rattan x1
basket rice 1 meter meter
meter
and
30
Forest, 15 20
bamboo inter-
home internodes internodes
nodes
gardens,
agricultural
Forest 25
land 15 20
100% 0 Bubu Fish trap Bamboo in inter-
internodes internodes
secondary nodes
forest areas

Drying Forest,
Red
0 100% Mat unhulled Forest home 1 m = 25 sticks x 1 meter
rattan
rice gardens

Drying Forest,
0 100% Mat unhulled Pandan Forest home 1 m = 30 leaves
rice gardens

Head Silat 8-10 14-15

0 100% Kedabang Forest Forest 6 leaves
covering leaves leaves leaves

1)
(n = 15); 2) (n = 50);
S = Small, M = Medium, L = Large

77
Journal of Forestry Research Vol. 7 No. 1, 2010: 70-89

Table 4. Results of interview from 65 households in the five villages surveyed:

activities related to handicraft making

Average Unit price (IDR) in 2007 Purpose of

Main time to (x 1000) production
Number of Average
Village liveli- Name of product finish one
households age
hood unit (per
S M L 1990 2007
person)

13 53 Woven basket (Anjat) 7 days 25 30 50

(Male = 3; Woven basket (Bakul) 5-6 days 60 70 100
Female =
Winnowing basket 1 day 15 20 25 Own use,
10)
Batu Lidung

Cultivation

sale to
Own
Bubu 1 day 15 20-30 50 other
use
villagers
Red rattan mat 7 days 1.5 x 4 m = 500
Pandanus mat 7 days 1 x 1.8 m = 100
Kedabang 1 day 15 20 25-30

13 43.7 Woven basket (Anjat) 7 days 20 - 30

(Male = 3; Woven basket (Bakul) 3-4 days 15 20 50
Female
Punan Bengalun

Winnowing basket 3 days 15 20 20 Own use,

=10)
Cultivation

sale to
Own
Bubu 2 days - - - other
use
villagers
Red rattan mat 10 days 1.5 x 4 m= 200
Pandanus mat 7-10 days 1 x 1.8 m= 100
Kedabang 2 days 15 20 30

13 40.3 Woven basket (Anjat) 7 days 30 45 75

(Male = 3; Woven basket (Bakul) 6-7 days 25 30 50
Female =
Winnowing basket 1 day 20 - 25 Own use,
10)
Cultivation

sale to
Sesua

Own
Bubu 2-3 days 20 - 30 other
use
villagers
Red rattan mat 7 days 1.5 x 4 m= 300
Pandanus mat 6-7 days 1 x 1.8 m= 100
Kedabang 1 day 20 - 25

13 52.3 Woven basket (Anjat) 6-7 days - 30 100

(Male = 4; Woven basket (Bakul) 5-7 days 30 35 100
Female = 9) Winnowing basket 1 day - 20 - Own use,
Cultivation
Mendupo

sale to
Own
Bubu 3 days 20 - 30 other
use
villagers
Red rattan mat 7 days 1 x 4 m = 200
Pandanus mat 7 days 1 x 4 m = 100
Kedabang 1 day 20 - 30

13 34.5 Woven basket (Anjat) 7 days 30 50 80-100

(Male = 3; Woven basket (Bakul) 2-5 days 25-30 50-60 70
5
Female =
Winnowing basket products/ 15 20 25 Own use,
10)
day
Cultivation
Seputuk

sale to
Own
Bubu 2 days 15 30 100 other
use
villagers,
sale to
Red rattan mat 7 days 1.2 x 8 m = 500
market
Pandanus mat 7 days 1 x 1.8 m = 100
Kedabang 1 day 15 20-25 30

Note: The interview results suggest that the price of products is higher if the consumer orders from the producer, and lower if
the producer offers them to consumers without orders.

78
 Non Timber Forest ..... E.N.N Sari

B. Forest-related Activities of Forest Communities

Results of this study suggested that the main livelihood of the households surveyed
was cultivation - an activity with a definite tradition. Colchester et al. (2003) mentioned
that forest communities have a number of distinctive characteristics regarding to their
activities, such as rotational and shifting cultivation, hunting, fishing, and collecting
forest products. Result of the study suggested that forest communities used to engage
in mutual cooperation for cultivation, from land preparation to product harvesting.
Households also used to help each other in clearing forest areas as new agricultural land.
This custom prevailed for a long time since before the villagers settled in their current
locations. Before settlement, they continually interacted with forests in relation to their
livelihoods for hunting, fishing, and collecting forest products from their surroundings.
They faced no difficulties in fulfilling their daily needs from forest resources, and
could collect or find what they needed within a short time. After settlement, the forest
communities still performed the same activities, but faced more limitations on access to
forest materials, as the distance from their current villages to the resources is quite far
compared to the pre-settlement period. Such communities therefore took longer time
to collect NTFPs, and the amounts collected have also decreased. However, they still
performed the same processes related to their activities regarding forests and NTFP
utilization. One process that was very obviously related to NTFP utilization was
collecting honey. The honey production peak was at the beginning of the fruit season
when there were lots of flowers. Very few villagers had the skills required to climb trees
for honey collection.
Some communities still utilized timber from secondary forests and NTFPs from
primary forests. The timber was generally used for building houses, with any surplus
being sold. While NTFPs were utilized mainly to fulfill daily needs, villagers also sold
leftover materials. Since settling in their current locations, forest communities have
continued to utilize NTFPs for handicraft making. Such groups usually made handicrafts
to fulfill their own needs, and sold them to others if there was demand. Among the five
villages-surveyed, only villagers in Seputuk who were running small-scale handicraft
industry using NTFPs. Women made winnowing baskets cooperatively in bulk and
sold their handicrafts in the market, while men made bubu and also sold them. It was
found that skills related to NTFP utilization in the other four villages-surveyed were not
yet optimal, although there was availability of natural resources. There were significant
differences in NTFP utilization by villagers in Seputuk and those in the other four
settlements. These discrepancies were affected by factors such as: 1) the community
characteristics of each village, which result in different levels of skill and capability;
2) the easy access to and abundant availability of materials for making handicrafts in
Seputuk village; and 3) the opportunity to make handicrafts as a trade item. Meanwhile,
handicraft making was very scarce in Batu Lidung.

79
Journal of Forestry Research Vol. 7 No. 1, 2010: 70-89

The villagers in Batu Lidung were unaware of the potential of utilizing natural
resources or NTFPs in economic support activities. This may have been caused by
the following factors: 1) the location of the village near the district of capital made
it more advanced than other villages inside the forest, which reduces villagers forest
dependency; and 2) although a plentiful supply of NTFPs was available, the variety of
work opportunities means that villagers had little interest in utilizing the forest. These
environmental differences between villagers in remote areas and those living near the
district of capital affected their outlook. In other words, development affected ways of
thinking.

C. Activities Related to Handicraft Making in Seputuk Village

In Seputuk village, 50% of females had the skills to make handicrafts. There was one
small-scale industry group in Seputuk, whose members were all female. The group had
eight members, and all were housewives with main livelihoods involving cultivation.
However, this small-scale industry has increased their incomes by 50%. In the village,
most residents took the opportunity to utilize NTFPs for making handicrafts to run
small-scale industry. Although they also engaged in cultivation for fruit trees and crops,
the small-scale handicraft industry provided a significant boost to their incomes.
The working system of this group was based on mutual cooperation, with the
eight members helping each other in making the winnowing baskets. For example, if
member A helped member B to make ten baskets one day, on another day B would
also help A to make ten units. This group was formed to facilitate the work involved
in collecting materials and marketing. All activities related to this small-scale industry
were performed collectively by the groups members, from work related to material
collection in forests to market sales. The activity of making winnowing baskets in the
group was performed in April, May, and June because the forest communities started
preparing land for cultivation in July. Every year, from July until the following March,
forest communities are busy with activities related to cultivation, such as preparing land
in July, planting upland-rice in August, maintaining cultivation for the next several
months, and finally harvesting in March.
In the small-scale industry group, each member was able to make five winnowing
baskets a day, working from 9 a.m. to 12 p.m. and then from 1 p.m. to 4 p.m. Activities
related to this manufacture include plaiting, binding with rope, and finishing. They
worked only 1 - 2 days a week. The main material used for making winnowing baskets
was bamboo, which was obtained from forests or sometimes from their own agricultural
land. In each material collection session, one person collected the materials for one
bamboo basket (equal to 15 sticks x 3 internodes), and bamboo processing was then
started. The bamboo was cut in half and the outer part only was removed, then it was
thinned, rolled, and spread out in the sun to dry. The process of drying took about 5
days, after which they started to plait the bamboo to make winnowing baskets.

80
 Non Timber Forest ..... E.N.N Sari

The small-scale industry group had a single leader, who was responsible for
organizing all activities related to the industry. The leader had to make sure that all
members carry out all activities based on the agreements made, such as those involving
mutual cooperation and working times. The central location for winnowing basket
manufacture is the leaders house. The members of the group made a uniform (medium)
size of winnowing baskets and sold them to the market at IDR 20,000 per unit (as of
2007). Small and large sizes could also be made, but since the medium size was the most
common and sold well, the group decided to make one size only. The products were sold
to the market once a batch of 50 units was completed.

D. The Custom of NTFP Utilization: Why Are Females More Active?

In NTFP utilization, women had more knowledge of forest products than men.
Women in the villages surveyed, for example, knew and were able to choose high-quality
rattan. Females in forest communities were major caretakers and users of forests. Besides
had been more active in NTFP utilization than men, they were also the main gatherers
of food and firewood, and seek out fruits, ferns, and nuts for their families. In addition,
they used bark, roots, and herbs for medicinal purposes. Women's gathering activities
were very important to household income and nutrition, and the products they collected
represented important supplements for their families. Most of what they gathered was
processed or sold for extra income. At the research site, women collected NTFPs for
handicraft making - a key activity in providing income that enabled their families to live
(FAO, 2008). Women also contributed to family life through many activities related to
forests. They played a significant role in an agriculture system that incorporated trees
and crops, and spent more time collecting NTFPs and firewood from forests. Research
results suggested that women were active in NTFP utilization activities. Within forest
communities, gender division in fulfilling living needs was a hereditary tradition. In
terms of livelihoods, men assumed the responsibility for hard physical tasks such as
timber cutting, while women took care of light work such as cooking and gathering
NTFPs from forests. In fact, the female role of carrying rattan home from forests, which
could involve a walk of 1 - 2 hours with the products on their shoulders could also be
considered hard work.
There was also gender division in handicraft making based on product types (Table
3). Men usually had the skills for making bubu and anjat (woven basket), while women
were usually adept at making mats, bakul (woven basket), winnowing basket, and
kedabang. This difference in skills between males and females in making handicrafts was a
hereditary tradition. However, there were occasions where men made bakul, winnowing
basket, or kedabang, or females made bubu or anjat, although this had been found to
be very rare.

81
Journal of Forestry Research Vol. 7 No. 1, 2010: 70-89

E. Awareness in Forest Communities Regarding the Benefits of NTFP Utilization

In the villages-surveyed, fulfillment of life requirements was ranked first among
three categories of forest existence benefits for forest communities. Both protection of
ecosystem balance and fulfillment of life needs were ranked second, and no benefit
was ranked third. These life requirements included food from plants and animals, plant-
based medicines, wood for housing, rattan for tying in hut construction, and fish from
forest swamps. The animals which were usually hunted were monkeys, wild boars, deers,
and monitor lizards. These results indicated that forest communities were more aware
to the role of forests as a product provider than as an environment protector. Polling
on the importance of education showed no effect on their points of view regarding to
the roles of forests.
For such communities, forests played an important role in fulfilling their needs.
Tens years ago, when forest communities were constantly shifting from one place to
the other ones, they fully depended on forests for the necessities of daily life, including
food, temporary housing, shelter, medicine, and recreation. Communities in or near
forests usually practice shifting cultivation and utilize forest products, and most of them
also have small gardens for permanent agriculture (Levang et al., 2005). At that time,
these communities had not yet recognized currency, and did not need it at all in their
lives; all their needs were met by forests, which provided them with real benefits. Forest
communities had no restrictions on the use of forest products, and could cut timber
easily whenever they needed to make small boats, build houses or collect firewood. They
could find rattan readily when they needed it. They could also hunt animals easily and
catch fish when they needed food. These conditions had gradually changed from 1945,
when the Indonesian government started forcing forest communities to settle in one
place in a policy designed to facilitate educational and health services for them. Since
this settlement, children in such communities have entered education in formal schools.
Many years have passed since the forest communities settled in their current
locations. However, although there was formal schooling for children, people in the
five villages-surveyed still got low levels of education. This has affected ways of thinking,
which in turn influences their ability to increase living standards. Ways of thinking
also affected the ability of such communities to optimize natural resource utilization.
Although a wider variety of jobs has become available for forest communities, most
members of these groups at the research site were farmers. All of the 65 households
surveyed were making handicrafts from NTFPs to fulfill their own needs, and some were
selling these products to other villagers or to the market (Table 4). All 65 households
realized that their skills were inherited from their ancestors, and that they should keep
practicing them to prevent the gradual disappearance of such abilities. The other reasons
why these residents made handicrafts were: 1) the materials required were provided by
forests in the surrounding area; 2) there was a need for such handicrafts to fulfill their

82
 Non Timber Forest ..... E.N.N Sari

needs; 3) they received additional income when others buy these products from them;
and 4) the additional income could support them when the cultivation failed.

F. Awareness Regarding Opportunities for the Development of Small-Scale

NTFPs Industry
The establishment of forest concessionaire prompted a change in ways of thinking
in forest communities, which started selling handicrafts to others or to the market as well
as bartering them for other products based on agreement. The opinion poll question
Why do you make these handicrafts? suggested the answers: 1) We have the skill to
make them; 2) The materials are available around us and in the forest; 3) We need these
products to fulfill our needs; and 4) If others want to buy our products, it will give us an
additional income. In the five villages-surveyed, most forest communities were making
handicrafts to fulfill their own needs and sell them to other villagers (Figure 2 a).
Among the survey targets, the forest communities in Seputuk village showed a
higher level of development in utilizing NTFPs to make handicrafts. They formed
and organized a group to run small-scale industry and sell the products to the market.
Although their marketing system was simple (Figure 2b), but their desire to develop the
business was great. The reasons of group members for running this small-scale industry
were: 1) they could earn additional income; 2) market opportunities were large, as other
communities had not yet established the same type of business; 3) they had the skills to
make these handicrafts, and wanted to apply their skills in utilizing the materials found
in abundance around them; and 4) they need a side job to secure their income when
the cultivation failed.
A model for a more advanced marketing system is presented in Figure 2 c. The
involvement of stakeholders in supporting communities for the utilization and
management of NTFPs was very important. This study suggested that the 65 households
surveyed who were active in NTFP utilization and handicraft making were ready to run
these activities more seriously if there were stakeholders who were willing to assist them
in managing their small-scale industry. This means that the achievement of a better life
in forest communities depends not only on the residents themselves but also on the
contribution of the stakeholders involved.
Among the five villages-surveyed, the forest communities in Punan Bengalun
village were the slowest in starting to sell handicraft products because they were late in
recognizing currency. The results of the field survey of 2008 suggested that until then
they still bartered their handicraft products for other goods such as food. This forest
community also had a lower level of education than the other four villages-surveyed
because it was located in a more remote area. A road to the village was established by
the local government, but it was impassable in rainy season. The route was unpaved and
very steep, making it very slippery during and after rain.

83
Journal of Forestry Research Vol. 7 No. 1, 2010: 70-89

The research results suggested that a major challenge to the further development
of NTFP utilization by forest communities was the limited availability of knowledge
and information for such groups regarding market opportunities for the development of
small-scale industry. Forest communities had the skills and capability to make handicrafts
and run small-scale industry, but had no idea how to market the products.
In the five villages-surveyed, the major obstacles faced by forest communities were
marketing problems and a lack of assistance and guidance. The residents there ran simple
market systems that had scope for improvement in terms of increasing profits. However,
this simple market setup stems from their own ideas, as they considered that the market
system consists of two parts - producer and buyer - and they had already become familiar
to this setup. At the research site, it was found that some villagers wanted to run small-
scale industry related to natural resource and NTFP utilization seriously, but they were
hindered by the difficulty of securing financial capital. Statistics describing the perception
of the households surveyed toward NTFP utilization, handicraft making, and small-scale
industry opportunities are presented in Table 5. One way to optimize NTFP utilization
to provide business opportunities for forest communities was to allow the extension of
such utilization on an optimum and efficient scale. Providing financial capital efficiently
and effectively to communities wishing to run small-scale industry would also support
them in the optimization of NTFP usage. The objective of these ideas was to find a way
to optimize the use of NTFPs and to enhance life in forest communities. This goal can
be realized through support provided by all the stakeholders involved (Table 6).

84
 Figure 2.
a: Scheme of NTFP utilization and handicraft making in Mendupo, Batu Lidung, Sesua, and Punan
Bengalun
b. Scheme of NTFP utilization and handicraft making in Seputuk
Non Timber Forest ..... E.N.N Sari
c. Recommended scheme for NTFP utilization and small-scale industry

(a)
a.

Natural resources/NTFPs Villagers Other villagers

Handicraft making

(b)
b.

Natural resources/NTFPs Villagers Market

Other villagers

Small-scale industry/
handicraft making

c.
(c)
Extension to optimize natural
resource/NTFP utilization,
Collectors
human resource development

Forest
Natural resources/ communities/ Market
NTFPs villagers

Conservation and Profits

preservation of
natural resources

Legend:
Small-scale industry/
Direct sale if possible handicraft making
Assisted by stakeholders:
- Local government
Provision of financial
- NGOs capital, assistance,
- Experts monitoring
- Forest concessionaires
- Observers
Figure 2. (a) Scheme of NTFP utilization and handicraft making in Mendupo, Batu Lidung,
Sesua, and Punan Bengalun; (b) Scheme of NTFP utilization and handicraft
making in Seputuk; (c) Recommended scheme for NTFP utilization and small- 18
scale industry

85
Journal of Forestry Research Vol. 7 No. 1, 2010: 70-89

Table 5. Statistics describing household perceptions toward NTFP utilization,

handicrafts, and small-scale industry opportunities (results of interview
from 65 households in the five villages surveyed)

Question n Mean Std. dev.

Where do you obtain materials for handicraft making (main source)?

(0 = forest, 1 = agricultural land in secondary forest, 3 = home garden) 65 0 0

Do you plant any of the following on your own agricultural land or in your home
garden?
a. Rattan (no = 0, yes = 1) 65 0.48 0.50
b. Bamboo (no = 1, yes = 1) 65 0.32 0.47
c. Silat trees (no = 0, yes = 1) 65 0 0
d. Pandan (no = 0, yes = 1) 65 0.35 0.48

How do you rate access to NTFPs in forest areas

in 2008 compared to 18 years ago (1990)?
(easier = 0, the same = 1, more difficult = 2) 65 1.51 0.50

What is your main purpose in making handicrafts?

(own use = 0, sale to other villagers = 1, sale to market = 2) 65 1 0.79

Do you believe you can improve your economic standing by making handicrafts?
(no = 0, dont know = 1, yes = 2) 65 1.74 0.51

a) Do you want to run small-scale industry related to handicrafts? (for

households who have not started small-scale industry yet) / b) Do you
want to develop your small-scale industry (for households who have
started small-scale industry)
(no = 0, dont know = 1, yes = 2) 65 1.57 0.66

86
 Non Timber Forest ..... E.N.N Sari

Table 6. Recommended assistance programs to be implemented by stakeholders to

optimize NTFP utilization

Recommended
No. Purpose Stakeholders involved
support activity
1 Provision of guidance on To increase awareness of utilizing Local government,
the potential of natural resources natural resources toward the forest concessionaires
enhancement of community living
standards
2 Provision of financial capital for To offer financial support for Local government,
small-scale industry communities toward optimizing the forest concessionaires
capacity for small-scale industry
3 Infrastructure development To support the infrastructure Local government,
needed by communities to increase forest concessionaires
living standards
4 Educational improvement To broaden knowledge Local government,
forest concessionaires
(in cooperation with
experts, NGOs, and
observers)

IV. CONCLUSIONS
Most of the forest communities in Batu Lidung, Punan Bengalun, Sesua, Mendupo,
and Seputuk are still depending on NTFPs in supporting of their livelihood, even though
now days to collect those sources is not easy anymore due to decreasing of forest lands.
Some communities in the five surveyed-villages were aware regarding on the benefits
of NTFPs utilization for industry. Activities related to handicraft making by forest
communities have prevailed for many generations, and started selling their products to
others since recognizing currency - even more so since the establishment of the forest
concessionaire in the area.
Forest communities in Seputuk village have started running small-scale industry
involving handicraft making using NTFPs since 2000. This small-scale industry group
was established under their own initiative, since they recognized market opportunities.
Awareness related to NTFP utilization for small-scale industry was due to a number of
factors, mainly the location of NTFPs are become remote and there is a tendency that
people close to the district capital have a limited desire to utilize NTFPs, and therefore
they mostly prefer to get other job, even though, small-scale NTFP-based industry has
a potential to increase the number of local employment opportunities and provides
additional income.

87
Journal of Forestry Research Vol. 7 No. 1, 2010: 70-89

ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The author gratefully acknowledges the financial assistance provided by the
International Tropical Timber Organization (ITTO), and also thanks PT. Intracawood
Manufacturing for its cooperation and assistance during the field survey. The author
thanks Dr. Ir. Taulana Sukandi, M.Sc and Dr. Ir. Kade Sidiyasa for their helpful
suggestion on this paper.

REFERENCES
Ali, T., M. Ahmad, B. Shahbaz, and A.Q. Suleri. 2007. Impact of participatory forest
management on financial assets of rural communities in Northwest Pakistan.
Ecological Economics, doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.12.017.
BPS (Badan Pusat Statistik). 2006. Berita Resmi Statistik No 47/IX/1 September 2006
(in Indonesian). Jakarta.
Colchester, M., M. Sirait, and B. Wijardjo. 2003. The applications of FSC Principles No.
2 & 3 in Indonesia: Obstacles & possibilities. WALHI, AMAN, and the Rainforest
Foundation. Bogor, Indonesia.
FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization). 1997. Asia-Pacific forestry sector outlook
study: Technology scenarios in the Asia-Pacific Forestry sector. Working Paper
No. APFSOS/WP/25.
FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization). 2008. Gender and non-timber forest
products: Promoting food security and economic empowerment. International
Fund for Agricultural Development. Rome, Italy.
Indonesian Forestry Department. 2007. Data on forest concession holders in Indonesia
by the Indonesian Forestry Department (not published).
Komarudin H., Y.L. Siagian, and N.P. Oka. 2007. Linking collective action to non-
timber forest product market for improved local livelihoods: Challenges and
opportunities. CAPRI Working Paper No. 73, December 2007.
Levang, P., E. Dounias, and S. Sitorus. 2005. Out of the forest, out of poverty? Forests,
Trees and Livelihoods Journal 15: 211-236.
Limberg, G., R. Iwan, E. Wollenberg, and M. Moeliono. 2005. Opportunities and
constraints to community forestry: Experience from Malinau. Governance Brief.
CIFOR. Bogor, Indonesia.
Malik, J. and E.S. Sumadiwangsa. no year. Research, development and utilization strategy
of non timber forest product: Indonesia case. Available at http://www.fao.org/
DOCREP/ARTICLE/WFC/XII/0446-A2.HTM (accessed on 1st July 2009).

88
 Non Timber Forest ..... E.N.N Sari

Mittermeier, R.A. and I.A. Bowles. 1993. The GEF and biodiversity conservation:
Lessons to date and recommendations for future actions. Conservation
International Policy Papers I, US.
Palmer, C. 2004. The role of collective action in determining the benefits from IPPK
logging concessions: A case study from Sekatak, East Kalimantan. Center for
International Forestry Research, Bogor.
Pierce, A.R. 1999. The challenges of certifying non-timber forest products. Journal of
Forestry 97 (2).
Quang, D.V. and T.N. Anh. 2006. Commercial collection of NTFPs and households
living in or near the forests: Case study in Que, Con Cuong and Ma, Tuong Duong,
Nghe An, Vietnam. Ecological economics 60: 65-74.
Suwarno, A. and B. Campbell. 2005. Modeling the dynamics of landscapes and
livelihoods in Malinau District, Indonesia. Proceedings of MODSIM 2005
International Congress on Modeling and Simulation Society of Australia and
New Zealand, Melbourne, 12-15 December 2005.
Tewari, D.D. and J.Y. Campbell. 1995. Developing and sustaining non-timber forest
products: some policy issues and concerns with special reference to India. J. Sust.
For., 3(1): 53-79.
Yasmi, Y. 2003. Understanding conflict in the co-management of forest: the case of
Bulungan Research Forest. International Forestry Review 5 (1).

89