Unsc BG
Unsc BG
Unsc BG
SECURITY COUNCIL
AGENDA: REVIEWING THE NOTION OF
HUMANITARIAN INTERVENTION AS
DEREIVED FROM THE PRINCIPLE
RESPONSIBILTY TO PROTECT
UNDER THE LIGHT OF LATEST
EVENTS
INTRODUCTION
The Responsibility to Protect or R2P is a global political commitment which was endorsed by
all member states of the United Nations at the 2005 World Summit to prevent genocide, war
crimes, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity.
The principle of the Responsibility to Protect is based on the underlying premise
that sovereignty entails a responsibility to protect all populations from mass atrocity
crimes and human rights violations.The principle is based on a respect for the norms and
principles of international law, especially the underlying principles of law relating to
sovereignty, peace and security, human rights, and armed conflict.
Chapter VII
Chapter VII of the United Nations Charter sets out the UNSC 's powers to maintain peace. It
allows the Council to "determine the existence of any threat to the peace, breach of the peace, or
act of aggression" and to take military and nonmilitary action to "restore international peace and
security".
HISTORY
The origin of R2P was due to the failure of the committee to prevent attacks like Rwandan
Genocide and Srebrenica massacre. Many critics of the R2P claim that it is a Western concept,
but it was the African Union that pioneered the concept that the international community has a
responsibility to intervene in crisis situations if a state is failing to protect its population from
mass atrocity crimes.
REASONS TO ESTABLISH AND POWERS GIVEN to ICISS (International Commission on
Intervention and State Sovereignty)
Just cause: There must be "serious and irreparable harm occurring to human beings, or
imminently likely to occur".
Right intention: The main intention of the military action must be to prevent human
suffering.
Last resort: Every other measure besides military invention has to have already been
taken into account. (This does not mean that every measurement has to have been applied
and been shown to fail, but that there are reasonable grounds to believe that only military
action would work in that situation.)
Proportional means: The military means must not exceed what is necessary "to secure
the defined human protection objective".
Reasonable prospects: The chance of success must be reasonably high, and it must be
unlikely that the consequences of the military intervention would be worse than the
consequences without the intervention.
Right authority: The military action has to have been authorized by the Security
Council.
CURRENT SCENARIO :-
Following are the instances where R2P has been implemented:-
Kenya 2007/2008
Ivory Coast 2011
Libya 2011
Central African Republic (CAR) 2013
Syria
Burundi
Yemen
Assad
(Russian Backing)
ISIS
Protestors
(Headed by
(American Backing)
Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi)
Further Reading
http://www.un.org/en/preventgenocide/rwanda/
http://www.wfuna.org/the-un-and-r2p
http://www.responsibilitytoprotect.org/
http://www.un.org/en/preventgenocide/rwanda/about/bgresponsibility.shtml
https://unu.edu/publications/articles/responsibility-to-protect-and-the-protection-of-
civilians.html
http://www.cfr.org/humanitarian-intervention/dilemma-humanitarian-
intervention/p16524
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-mideast-crisis-syria-law-idUSKCN12O2S3
http://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/64/864&referer=https://www.goo
gle.co.in/&Lang=E
http://www.responsibilitytoprotect.org/index.php/crises/crisis-in-libya
http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/editorial/has-r2p-worked-in-libya-20110918-
1wqqb.html