Human Values Unit III Harmony in Family and Society4
Human Values Unit III Harmony in Family and Society4
Human Values Unit III Harmony in Family and Society4
Family, as defined by a 1970s Long Island, New York Housing Code (upheld by the U.S.
Supreme Court in 1974): One or more persons related by blood, adoption or marriage, living and
cooking together as a single housekeeping unit, exclusive of household servants.
Oxford English dictionary defines family as a group of persons consisting of the parents
and their children, whether actually living together or not. Family is a group of people or animals
(many species form the equivalent of a human family wherein the adults care for the young) affiliated
by consanguinity (Relationship by blood or by a common ancestor), affinity or co-residence. Although
the concept of consanguinity originally referred to relations by blood, anthropologists have argued
that one must understand the idea of blood metaphorically and that many societies understand family
through other concepts rather than through genetic distance.
1. Relationship IS and it exists between the self (I) and the other self (I): Once we have
recognized the existence of human relationships, we are subsequently able to identify the feelings
(values). When we work and behave according to these feelings, it leads to fulfillment of both sides
in the relationship, i.e. it leads to mutual fulfillment. Evaluation is a natural process when we live in
relationships and we constantly evaluating ours and the others feelings in the relationship. For
example, trust is wanted in a relationship and if there is a mutual feeling of trust, then it leads to
mutual fulfillment and there are no complaints. But if there is doubt on the other, the happiness in
relationship is missing.
It is not possible to create the relationships that are existent in a family. We are naturally born
into this. In a similar way, the family has not invented the social dependencies in which it exists.
The family exists naturally as a part of this social web of interdependency. So, we are embedded in
relationships, they are there and all that we need to do is to recognize them and understand.
2. The self (I) has feelings in a relationship. These feelings are between I and I: There are
feelings in relations naturally. They do not have to be created, nor can we remove them. We may
try to suppress them, or argue against them, or undermine them, but they are very much there.
These feelings are fundamental to the relationship and can be recognized. Lets ask some questions:
Question : Who has these feelings? I or body?
Answer : I
Question : With whom does I have these feelings? With the order I or the other body?
Answer : With the other I.
Hares another question:
Question : Who want trust in relationship? Our Self or body?
Answer : Self want trust.
Question : From whom we want this trust? The other I or Body?
Answer : From the other I.
This is something we can easily verify ourself, that it is I that wants trust. There is no part of
the body that wants trust, no part of the body that wants respect. When we respect someone, we respect
the persons I, and not their body organs. When we trust someone, it is the person, and not the body.
Trust is something to do with the person, the self (I). That is to say, the feelings in relationship are
between I and I.
3. These feelings in the self (I) are definite. i.e. they can be identified with definiteness.: With
little exploration, we can see that feelings in relationships are actually definite, and not vague.
These are the values characterizing relationships e.g. Trust, Respect, Affection, etc. Living with
these values, we are able to participate in the right way with other human beings.
4. Recognizing and fulfilling these feelings leads to mutual happiness in relationship: Once we
have recognized the existence of human relationships, we are subsequently able to identify the
feelings (values). When we work and behave according to these feelings, it leads to fulfillment of
both sides in the relationship, i.e. it leads to mutual fulfillment. Evaluation is a natural process when
we live in relationships and we are constantly evaluating ours and the others feelings in the
2
relationship. For example, trust is wanted in a relationship and if there is a mutual feeling of trust,
them it leads to mutual fulfillment and there are no complaints. But if there is doubt on the other,
the happiness in relationship is missing.
To summarize relationships in a family or in a society are not created, they just are. We can
understand these relationships and based upon this understanding, it will be natural to have right
feelings (values) in these relationships. These feelings are definite and can be recognized with
certainty. We have also seen that recognizing the relationship and having the feelings in relationship is
an activity of the self (I) and not the body. It becomes clear that relationship is between the self (I)
and other self (I) and the feelings are also between I and I. Mutual fulfillment is the natural
outcome of a relation correctly recognized and lived.
Justice (Nyaya)
Justice is the recognition of values (the definite feelings) in relationship, their fulfillment,
the right evaluation of the fulfillment resulting in mutual happiness. Justice concerns itself with the
proper ordering of things and people within a society.
Elements of justice
There are four elements: Recognition of values, fulfillment, evaluation and mutual
happiness ensured. When all the four are ensured, justice is ensured. Mutual fulfillment is the
hallmark of justice. And justice is essential in all relationships, be it with the small kid in our house, our
old grandpa, the maid in the house, our fast friends or our distant relations. We need to grow up in
relationships to ensure continuity of justice in all our relationships.
4
Trust (Visvasa)
Trust or vishwas is the foundational value in relationship. To be assured that each
human being inherently wants oneself and the other to be happy and prosperous.
Having faith in others and believing them. Mutual trust is a shared belief that we can depend on
each other to achieve a common purpose. Trust is the expectation of people that they can rely on our
word. It is built through integrity and consistency in relationships.
Trust building is not the one day work. This process of trust building remain continue 24 hours
and 365 days. One has to be honest in his approach otherwise trust will vanish. False commitment,
false talks and anything based on lie will erode the trust.
Elements of trust
The four elements of trust are:
1. Effective listening: the bottom line of trust: If we listen well, people will trust us. We cannot
establish trust if we cannot listen. A conversation is a relationship. Both speaker and listener play a
part, each influencing the other.
2. Empathy: It may be described as your pain in my heart. It allows us to create bonds of trust, it
gives us insight into what others may be feeling or thinking; it helps us understand how or why
others are reacting to situation, it sharpens our people acumen and informs our decisions.
3. Justice: If we know that a person believes in justice we trust him to make the right judgment.
4. Honesty: We always trust people whose integrity cannot be doubted.
How to be trustworthy
Be predictable: When one begins to think, Why is he doing that? Hes never done that before. His
behaviour becomes unpredictable. Any movement away from predictable behaviour can become
suspect and trust can deteriorate. Be consistent in what we do.
Make sure our words match the message: When our family and friends hear one thing in our words
but our tone of voice, body language and facial expressions are really saying something else, we
open the relationship to distrust. People learn not to trust part of what we are saying.
Believe the other person is competent: We must believe and know in our heart that the other person,
somewhere and somehow, beneath the games, has the internal strength and capacity to handle
anything. Such trust builds trust in the other person and begins to pervade the relationship.
Be extremely careful of keeping secrets:
Let our needs be known loudly: Be a lot self centered (be self centered, but not selfish). Start with
your eyes focused on YOU. What do you need? Explore your personal need system. Such
interaction helps move towards a trusting relationship?
Be fearless when faced with turmoil. Keep the faith!: Relationship of emotional investment, by their
nature, bring trials, tribulations (distress; suffering), fear, chaos, turmoil, change, stretching and
growth. They become the gist from which our life is shaped and formed. Be fearless when faced
with turmoil, upset, crisis, questions, and fears. The purpose of a relationship is not to make us
happy. Happiness may be an outcome, but difficulties are given to us to move us to where we really
want to be. Obstacles, trials and moments of pain are given as lessons on which we intentionally
write the script of our life individually and with others.
If we see this carefully we will realize that when we are judging ourself we are judging on the
basis of our intention, whereas, when we are judging the other we are judging him on the basis of his
competence. We are sure in point 2 a) that we want to make the other happy, but in point 4 a) we are
not sure that the other wants to make us happy. We find that while we look at our intention, we are sure
of it, we are not sure of the others intention. We are actually seeing their competence, and making a
6
conclusion on their intention, we say I wanted to do well, but I could not. But for the other, we say
He did not want to do well. Wanting to, is the intention, could not, is the lack of competence.
We trust our own intention while we are not ready to trust the others intention. It is the same for
the others as well. They would also have the same answers as we, to the table above. While the
other trusts his/her own intentions, he/she does not trust mine. Hence, mistrust is born and we deny
the relationship.
We also see that we are not able to fulfill our intentions in terms of our competence at all times. It is
the same for the other as well.
We want to be related to the other, and we want the other to be related to us, irrespective of who
this other is. If we have trust in the other, we are able to see the other as a relative and not as an
adversary. We then become ready to become a help to the other. Intentions are always correct; it is
only the competence that is lacking, which can be improved by right understanding.
We may ask, How do we know what the other persons intentions are?
Ans: I can judge myself properly, and find out about myself. It I am sure of the answers to 1 and 2
above, then 3 and 4 are just a reflection of 1 and 2. (Other person is a reflection of me)
The mistake takes place because when I am looking at myself, I see my intention but, when I am
looking at the other, I see his competence. As a result I conclude about the intention of the other
person based on his competence.
Intention wise, all of us want to make ourselves happy and the other person happy. Whereas
competence-wise, we all are unable to do this.
We can see that just as our competence is lacking and we fail to always make the other happy,
the others competence is also lacking, which is why they fail to always make us happy in relationship.
But when the other fails, we very quickly doubt their intention, which is what causes the problems in
relationship.
Questions in mind
How can I trust a stranger? : If we are able to see the relationship with the person at the level of I,
we will see that the other person also is like us. The other person has natural acceptance for the
same things as we have. He/she too wants to make himself/herself happy and wants to make us
happy at the level of his intention, just as we. But he/she is unaware of this fact, just as we has
been. Hence, he/she may be interacting with us based on our competence. The way out is to relate
to the other person, to be able to see that at the level of natural acceptance, we are the same. We can
then interact with the person based on their competence, and also help them improve their
competence.
How can I trust someone who has bad intentions? : In this statement the word intentions is used
in a different sense. When we normally use the word intention today, we are only considering the
competence (rather lack of it), and not the real intention. For example: someone may be plotting
to rob a house. We may say he wants to rob my house. Actually, the person has assumed that
robbing our house will make him fulfill his physical needs and be prosperous, at the level of his
desires, thoughts and expectations (selections). Because:
o He has not paid attention to his own natural acceptance at all (no one, even in education,
pointed this out to him)
o Due to the unfavourable circumstances that he has grown up in, or lives in, he has assumed that
robbing is right or the only way. So he goes ahead and does it.
7
But this is still at the level of his desires, thoughts and selection and hence his competence (or lack
of it), and not his intention or at the level of his natural acceptance. When we say that the robber
wants to rob our house, he is actually desiring, thinking and selecting this in absence of
realization and understanding.
I know someones character is not good. How can I trust someone like that? : We look at
someones behaviour, what one thinks, what one does, and end up concluding on the others
character. Whereas, this is actually the lack of competence, it is at the level of desires, thoughts
and selection in I keeps changing. Hence, people are unpredictable and we end up doubting their
character. However, if we start looking at the level of the persons natural acceptance, we find that
we are all the same. So, when a person behaves badly, it is not that he/she truly wants to have a bad
character; rather, he/she is just operating at the level of assumptions and beliefs which is the
competence or rather, lack of it. Character at the level of ones competence, is different from
intention/natural acceptance. The former is unstable, and unpredictable, the latter is definite. We
have to start seeing the latter, since the former is not acceptable to us, and only leads to problems.
If I trust everyone, wouldnt people take undue advantage of me? : On the contrary, it gives us inner
strength and we become far more effective in interacting with and dealing with different people.
This is simply because, we already are sitting with the knowledge of what the person truly wants,
truly intends, even though the person may not know this himself/herself! Hence, our ability to
interact with people becomes far more effective and in the process, we dont get hurt, we dont get
disturbed, we end up becoming an aid to the other. In other words, becoming aware, having the
right understanding, living with the assurance in relationship does not mean becoming stupid! It
only makes us, more competent. Further, what is being said here is that we have trust on the
intention of everyone, but, when it comes to making a program with someone, I evaluate my
competence, I evaluate his competence and make the program accordingly. This makes me more
effective.
This person can never be trusted. Be careful of that person. : This only means that the person we
are talking about is someone that is under wrong assumptions, all the time! It means their
competence is really lacking. The other is not aware of ones own natural acceptance at all, and
hence has assumed things that only make one unhappy, but also to see the truth, to be able to access
their own natural acceptance.
Never trust anyone blindly. : To be blind, means not to have the right understanding. It means we
are aware of our own natural acceptance. It means we are living solely on the basis of our
imagination, or our elections. Not to be blind means to be aware, to know the truth, to have the
right understanding. For this, we have to start this dialogue within ourselves, between what we are,
and what we really want to be.
So, you can trust anyone (for the intention part)! But dont assume that his/her desires,
thoughts and expectations are going to be right (he/she may lack competence)!
It is important to be able to differentiate between the intention (wanting to) and the competence
(the ability to do so). The intention of the other is always to make us happy, just like we always have
the intention of wanting the happiness of the other. But ours, as well as the others competence is
lacking, for which we have to accept responsibility to improve and work towards having the right
understanding for this improvement.
8
In all our relationships, trust is the foundation. A relationship without trust result in opposition,
the relationship itself gets shaken up. Lack of trust is what ultimately leads to extreme situation like
war.
Trust is thus called the foundation value.
Respect (Sammana)
Respect means individuality. The sense of individuality is prime object. This is the first basic
step towards respect (sammana). Once we realized that we are individual then only we can see ourself
different from others. In other words, respect means right evaluation, to be evaluated as I am.
Usually however, we make mistakes in our evaluation in the following three ways.
Over evaluation to evaluate more than what it is.
If you are wrongly flattered you feel uncomfortable. Eg. You are sitting at home and there are
guests around. Your father says My son/daughter is the greatest scholar in India! Check for
yourself; do you feel comfortable, or do you feel uncomfortable?
Under evaluation to evaluate less than what it is.
If you are condemned, you feel uncomfortable. Eg. You are still at home, but this time your
father says My son/daughter is good for nothing. He must be the laziest person in all of India!
You obviously feel uncomfortable, you dont find this acceptable.
Otherwise evaluation to evaluate otherwise than what it is.
If you are evaluated as something else, you feel uncomfortable. Eg. You are at home and there
are guests around and your father says You donkey! Cant you even understand this much?
You feel offended by this. This is evaluating you otherwise, as you are a human being and not
something else.
We can see that any kind of over, under or otherwise evaluation makes us uncomfortable, we
find it unacceptable. We feel disrespected. We say we have been disrespected, when we are wrongly
evaluated.
Thus, respect means to rightly evaluate. Can you think of the number of instances when you
feel you have wrongly evaluated, and the number of times you may have done the same to others? You
would be surprised to find, this happens very often, and we are insensitive about this aspect in
relationship. Even thought it is the cause of many problems for us in relationship, we ignore the point
about respect. We also have many different notions about respect that we currently hold as individuals
and as a society. For example, saluting someone is called respecting someone today, even fire guns in
the air after people are dead, as a mark of respect, we put red bulbs on our cars for respect, we build
big houses in the thirst for respect, we take care of our clothing, we dress up, we have different hair
cuts, we buy fancy cell phones, we boast about the bike we have, a whole lot of things are going on in
the world in search for respect.
Respect denotes both a positive feeling of esteem for a person or other entity (such as a nation
or a religion), and also specific actions and conduct representative of that esteem. Respect can be a
specific feeling of regard for the actual qualities of the one respected (e.g., "I have great respect for her
judgment"). It can also be conduct in accord with a specific ethic of respect. Rude conduct is usually
considered to indicate a lack of respect, disrespect, whereas actions that honor somebody or something
indicate respect. Respect should not be confused with tolerance, since tolerance doesn't necessarily
imply any positive feeling, and is incompatible with contempt, which is the opposite of respect.
On a practical level it seems to include taking someone's feelings, needs, thoughts, ideas,
wishes and preferences into consideration. We might also say it means taking all of these seriously
and giving them worth and value. In fact, giving someone respect seems similar to valuing them and
their thoughts, feelings, etc. It also seems to include acknowledging them, listening to them, being
truthful with them, and accepting their individuality and idiosyncrasies.
9
Respect can be shown through behavior and it can also be felt. We can act in ways which
are considered respectful, yet we can also feel respect for someone and feel respected by someone.
Because it is possible to act in ways that do not reflect how we really feel, the feeling of respect is more
important than the behavior without the feeling. When the feeling is there, the behavior will naturally
follow.
10
2. We both need to have the right understanding, which is to understand and live in harmony at all four
levels of our living.
Our program of action is the same.
3. The activities and powers of the self are continuous and the same in both of us at the level of I.
Our potential is the same.
Based on these three evaluations we can conclude that
The other is similar to me
When we are able to see that the other is similar to me, we are able to recognize the feeling of
respect in the relationship. If not, we either hold ourselves, more or less than the other and this only
leads to differentiation.
There are different ways we differentiate between people today! Let us look them in detail one
by one:
On the basis of body
Sex/gender: We have such notion as, respect males more than females, or even the other way round
in some societies. We ignore the fact that being male or female is an attribute of the body, and not
an attribute at the level of I. In many countries, people even prefer a male child to a female child,
and in some other societies, the other way round.
Race: If the person is of the same race as oneself, then we treat them differently. For example, we
differentiate on the basis of skin colour white, brown, black etc. or on the basis of whether the
person is of Aryan race, Mongolian race etc. or on the basis of caste, taking some caste to be high,
the other to be low. Again here, we dont do the evaluation on the basis of I, but on the basis of
the body- the colour of the skin or the race or the caste of the body, i.e. by the features, long noses,
short noses, height, etc.
Age: We have notions such as one must respect elders. What about youngsters? Should we insult
them? Should we not respect them as well? Here, we see that we are again evaluating at the level of
the body age is related to the body, and not to I.
11
Physical strength: If someone is stronger, we again treat him/her differently. This is again at the
level of the body. In fact, we think that we are respecting the other while it is fear; the fear that if
we do not treat them like this, we will be harmed.
Differentiation based on race: There are many movements and protect against racial discrimination,
and demands for equality. We hear of racial attacks, which are basically to do with this issue of respect.
The movements against cast discrimination has been growing in India for over decades. Such
discrimination leads to people living in fear of such racism, racist attacks, casticism and discrimination.
Differentiation based on age: We hear of protests and movements demanding for equal rights for
children on the one hand and for rights for elderly people on the other. The problem of generation gap
12
is talked about quite often. One generation talks about being ignored by the other generation, and this
has become the source of tension in many families.
Differentiation based on wealth: This is an area that is increasingly becoming a very big area of
differentiation and is leading to all kinds of large scale problems. We are all aware of the whole debate
around rich countries and poor countries. Not understanding the need for physical facilities, and
working for wealth to fetch respect has led to class struggle and movements to do away with class-
differentiation. If the need for physical facilities is understood properly, we do not identify it with
happiness. Otherwise we find a large problem at the level of individuals, with many people suffering
from a lack of self-esteem and some even committing suicide, when they feel they cannot accumulate
enough wealth so as to get the respect that is due to them.
Differentiation based on post: We see protests against high handed government officials, because
people feel they are being taken advantage of. This is due to the tremendous differentiation we make on
the basis of position. At the level of the individual, it also leads to depression, etc. since if someone
does not get or qualify for a post, they end up feeling that they will not get the respect in the society.
Differentiation based on isms: We are all quite aware of this differentiation on the basis of different
thought-systems. Communism for example always seems to be at war with capitalism and feudalism.
We hear of fights, turmoil, terrorism and war, most of them to do with these Isms. We even hear of
people converting from one Ism to another in order to be able to get more respect.
Differentiation based on sects: We are all well aware of this. We have ended up making countless
religions and sects and each sect has its own movement to ensure that there is no discrimination against
people of their belief. There are demands for special provisions in jobs and in education based on
religions and sects. Some of these protests and clashes between people of different beliefs even turn
violent.
Self respect
Self respect means proper respect for oneself and one's worth as a person. Respect for one's self
or for one's own character; a proper regard for and care of one's own person and character; the feeling
that only very good actions are worthy of the standard which one has generally maintained, and up to
which one has acted is known as self respect.
1. Self respect is the virtue of oneness. 1. Abhiman is the result of gaining supremacy in
an area with ego.
2. The thought process in self respect is related to 2. To make a mistake is only an error in
the duty towards himself without selfishness. judgment but to adhere to it when it is
discovered shows infirmity of character.
3. To undermine the self respect of other is a sin.
It is the highest form of self respect to admit
our errors and mistakes and make amends for
them.
Respect Differentiation
Respect Ego
Affection (sneha)
Affection is the feeling of being related to the other.
Affection comes when I recognize that we both want to make each other happy and both of us
are similar. Then for the first time, I feel that I am related to the other that the other is a relative of
mine. This feeling is called affection.
The feeling of affection comes only if trust and respect are already ensured. Without trust and
respect, you feel the other is trying to make you unhappy, does not wish well for you and hence you
can never feel affection for him/her. You always see the other as being in opposition. And that is why
today in the family, you find that people have been living together for years and years and still dont
feel related to each other, because that basic trust and respect are missing.
Affection is a process of social interaction between two or more organisms. Affection is a "disposition
or rare state of mind or body" that is often associated with a feeling or type of love. Based on this
definition we can clarify affection as:
Affection is something that flows among people, something that one gives and one receives.
To provide affection is something that requires effort.
Affection is something essential for human species, especially in the childhood and in the illness.
Care (Mamata)
The feeling of care is the feeling to nurture and protect the body of our relative.
Or in other words a state of mind in which one is troubled; worry, anxiety, or concern is called
care. Care is level of active concern, or lack of negligence, towards avoidance of possible dangers,
mistakes, pitfalls, and risks, demanded of a party as a duty or legal obligation.
We understand a human being as a coexistence of the self (I) and the body, and the body is an
instrument of I. Based on this understanding, we take the responsibility of nurturing and protecting
the body of our relatives.
Guidance (vatsalya)
The feeling of ensuring right understanding and feelings in the other (my relative) is
called guidance.
We understand the need of self (I) for right understanding and feelings. We also understand
that the other is similar to me in his/her faculty of natural acceptance, desire of wanting continuous
15
happiness and the program of living in harmony at all the four levels. The other is also similar to me in
the potential of desire, thoughts and expectation.
Reverence (shraddha)
The feeling of acceptance of excellence in the other is called reverence.
We understand that we aspire for continuous happiness and to realize it, we have to understand
harmony at all the levels of our living, and live accordingly. When we see that the other has achieved
this excellence- which means to understand and to live in harmony at all the levels of living ensuring
continuity of happiness, we have a feeling of reverence for him/her. This feeling of accepting the
excellence in the other is called reverence.
Glory (gaurava)
Each one of us wants to live with continuous happiness and prosperity. Each one of us has the
similar faculty of natural acceptance, has the same goal and program and we have the same potential to
realize this.
Glory is the feeling for someone who has made efforts for excellence.
We find that there have been people in the history, or even around us, who are investing their
time, energy and their belongings to achieve excellence (to understand and to live in harmony at all
levels of living ensuring continuity of happiness), to make others excellent. This gives us a feeling of
glory for them.
Gratitude (kritagyata)
We understand that each one of us have goal of continuous happiness and prosperity. Each one
of us has to work towards increasing our competence to realize our intention and in this process, we are
helped and guided by others that have the right understanding. When we understand this and begin to
recognize the feeling in ourselves, we feel gratitude in our relationship.
Gratitude is the feeling of acceptance for those who have made efforts for my excellence.
Today, we find that generally what we call as gratitude is a feeling coming out of assistance at
the level of physical facilities. This feeling is short lived since the happiness we get from the right
understanding is permanent.
Gratitude is an emotion that occurs after people receive help, depending on how they interpret
the situation. Specifically, gratitude is experienced if people perceive the help they receive as (a)
valuable to them, (b) costly to their benefactor, and (c) given by the benefactor with benevolent
intentions (rather than ulterior motives)
Love (prema)
Love is the emotion of strong affection and personal attachment. In other words, love is a
feeling of warm personal attachment or deep affection, as for a parent, child, or friend.
In philosophical context, love is a virtue representing all of human kindness, compassion, and
affection. In religious context, love is not just a virtue, but the basis for all being ("God is love"), and
the foundation for all divine law (Golden Rule).
The word love can refer to a variety of different feelings, states, and attitudes, ranging from
generic pleasure ("I loved that meal") to intense interpersonal attraction ("I love my wife"). "Love" can
also refer specifically to the passionate desire and intimacy of romantic love, to the sexual love of eros
(cf. Greek words for love), to the emotional closeness of familial love, or to the platonic love that
defines friendship, to the profound oneness or devotion of religious love. This diversity of uses and
16
meanings, combined with the complexity of the feelings involved, makes love unusually difficult to
consistently define, even compared to other emotional states.
This feeling or value is also called the complete value since this is the feeling of relatedness to
all human beings. It starts with identifying that one is related to the other human being (the feeling of
affection) and it slowly expands to the feeling of being related to all human beings. The feeling of love
leads to an undivided society, it starts from a family and slowly expands to the world family in the form
of love.
17
Topic - Harmony in Society From Family Order to World Family Order
Society
Society or human society is the set of relations among people, including their social status
and roles. By extension, society denotes the people of a region or country, sometime even the world,
taken as a whole. Used in the sense of an association, a society is a body of individuals outlined by
the bounds of funcitonal interdependence, possibly comprising characteristics such as national or
cultural identity, social solidarity, language or hierarchical organization. Human societies are
characterized by patterns of relationships between individuals sharing a distinctive culture and
institutions. Like other communities or groups, a society allows its members to achieve needs or wishes
they could not fulfill alone.
The world society may also refer to an organized voluntary association of people for religious,
benevolent, cultural, scientific, political, patriotic, or other purpose. Today the term society is currently
used to cover both a number of political and scientific connotations as well as a variety of associations.
1. Right understanding is necessary for the human beings, for all human beings. When one does not
have the right understanding, one remains disturbed and also acts in a manner so as to create
disharmony with other human being as well as with rest of nature.
2. Prosperity is needed in every family. Prosperity in the family means that the family is able to
identify its needs and is able to produce/ achieve more than its requirements.
3. Trust in society means every member of society feels related to everyone else and therefore there is
trust and fearlessness.
18
4. Co-existence in nature means there is a relationship and complementarity among all the entities in
nature including human beings.
This is the comprehensive human goal.
With little exploration, we find that all four are required for human society. We are not satisfied
with anything less than this. This is the basic minimum requirement to ensure sustainable happiness
and prosperity. We cant cut down any of them. This is the minimum level that each one of us wants,
and also the maximum we can think of. We cant think of anything more than this. This is the target for
each one of us, the whole human race and the human tradition. The moment we leave anyone of them
out, there will be loss of continuity, and the goal cannot be achieved.
Samadhan
We can solve societys problems when we see beyond the contradictions of life. When we live
in a higher consciousness, we obtain the higher knowledge that sees the higher harmonies which enable
the resolution of evey problem.
Samridhi (Prosperity)
Prosperity is the state of flourishing, thirving, success, or good fortune. Prosperity often
encompasses wealth but also includes other factors which are independent of wealth to varying
degrees, such as happiness and health.
Abhay
Man is eager to live and afraid to die. Most problems owe themselves to this fact. The fear of
death might be reckoned as a prime fear but the most primeval and basic fear is that of expectation
being defeated, or more specifically, that of loosing what one delusively thinks one owns (the delusion
this is mine). Fear of losing what one is attached to (the family, for example) gives birth to the fear of
death and therefore the former is the most basic fear because one is attached to the body and is afraid to
lose it. Fear resides within and not outside us. External fear is mere fiction. If we succeed in cultivating
fearlessness no incident, no external circumstances can strike fear in us.
Abhay is not associated with bhaya and nirbhaya, at all. Abhaya means fearlessness; it is a
permanent state where there is no question of ever experiencing any fear. A person with abhaya is
continuously aware if his own reality; for him to become subject to fear would be impossible. We
should not consider this quality of abhaya as just the absence of fear.
Fear is only a delusion created by the mind; lack of fear is also a delusion created by the mind.
Mistaking one thing for another leads to fear; recognizing the mistake and rectifying it, leads to the
removal of fear. These two, Bhaya and Nirbhaya, are associated with fear and the freedom from fear.
19
2. Fear of the past can be overcome if we take responsibility for our actions and stop doing things
which will add to our guilt later.
3. Insecurity can be overcome if we accept our limitations and perceive the wonderful cosmic order as
a humble spectator.
Sah-
Sah-astitva (co- (co-existence)
The world is full of Diversity there are different nations, cultures, religions, communities,
languages, and beliefs. The beauty of existence can only be maximized if everything in this world is in
harmony. Peaceful, symbiotic co-existence is the key to harmony in the world. For peaceful co-
existence to occur in a diverse society the following must happen:
1. People must recognize that traditional interpretations of peaceful co-existence are outdated,
2. Governments and individuals must recognize that society neednt be homogeneous or
institutionalized to serve an important purpose for people,
3. Members of varying cultures, countries and faiths must learn to respect the traditions, beliefs and
boundaries of one another,
4. Religion and politics must be separate and
5. People must agree to disagree regarding certain moral values and beliefs and come to recognize that
others can be different from them and yet be equally capable in their own unique manner.
The above mentioned goal is not only comprehensive but also universal i.e. equally applicable
to all human beings and for all times. It includes all our aspirations and this is the goal for each one of
us. Thus it becomes the goal of human society, or the basic need of human civilization.
Now how are the four related? We will find the following when we look for the relation in the
above:
1. The harmony in the society begins from the individual. We need to ensure right understanding in
the individual as the foundation of harmony in the society.
2. With right understanding, the need for physical facilities in the family can be ascertained. By
assessing our needs correctly and by producing more than required the family can be prosperous.
3. Assurance of right understanding in the individuals and prosperity in the families, understanding of
human relationships leads to harmony and trust (fearlessness) in the society. When every individual
is able to live harmoniously in relationship, and the needs of all the families are ensured,
fearlessness (mutual trust) in society will naturally follow.
4. When human beings with right understanding interact with nature, it will be in consonance with the
co-existence and will be mutually enriching.
We may also understand it in the following sequence.
1. Right understanding 2. Prosperity 3. Fearlessness (trust) 4. Co-existence
Programs needed to achieve the comprehensive human goal: the five dimensions of human
endeavour
The five dimensions of human endeavour are:
1. Education Right Living (Siksha Sanskar)
2. Health Self Regulation (Svasthya Sanyam)
3. Justice Preservation (Nyaya Suraksha)
4. Production Work (Utpadan Kriya)
5. Exchange Storage (Vinimaya Kosh)
Justice
We say there is justice in a relationship when there is mutual fulfillment i.e. both individuals are
satisfied: which means the values are rightly recognized, fulfilled, rightly evaluated and mutual
happiness is ensured. Mutual happiness is the goal in relationship and each one of us has a
responsibility in ensuring a continuity of justice or nyaya in our society.
Preservation
Besides human-human relationships, we also have to work to ensure that our relationship with
the rest of nature is mutually enriching for humanity as well as for nature. This dimension of our
society works to ensure suraksha. This involves ensuring the following three aspects
1. Enrichment (I cultivate wheat; this enriches wheat as the quantity grows)
2. Protection (I protect it so that it is fit to eat)
3. Right utilization (I use it for nurturing of the body and do not let it get wasted).
Suraksha
What to produce
The decision of what to produce depends on the right identification of needs. For this, we have
to identify the physical needs of the body, i.e. what is needed for the nourishment, protection and right
21
utilization of the body. When we look into this, we can see that there is a need for: food, clothing,
shelter and various kinds of instruments (ex: means of transport, communication, remote viewing of
images, etc.) for the right utilization of the body.
How to produce
When we come to the question of how to produce, we are referring to the technology or systems
we use for production. On understanding of the harmony at all the levels of our living, it becomes
evident that there is an inherent balance, a harmony in nature. So, it is only natural that any production
system we design or implement is within the framework that is present in nature, i.e. it does not violate
the framework / harmony in nature. When we look at the way in which nature is organized, the
following becomes apparent:
1. The systems in nature are cyclic i.e. they are not open ended.
2. The systems in nature are mutually fulfilling or mutually enriching.
Thus the way to produce is: Through cyclical (avartansil) process, in harmony with nature.
1. It has to be cyclic
2. It has to ensure that every unit is enriched
In nature, there are four different kinds of entities. One kind of entity includes materials such as
air, water, soil, metals and non-metals, etc. The other kind has plants, herbs, etc. The other kind of third
kind has animals and birds, and the fourth kind includes human beings. When you look at their
interrelationship, you find that the materials, plants and animals are enriching for the other entities
including human beings.
If only we understand the process in nature, we can design our production systems through
application of science and technology in such a way that this mutual fulfillment is better ensured, rather
than disturbing it.
We can now see how these five dimensions of humanistic society are able to ensure the human
goal:
Education Right living leads to Right understanding
22
Having the process of education and right living leads to right understanding in the individual.
Health Self-regulation leads to Prosperity
Having the program for health and sanyam leads to well being of the body, nad identification of
need for physical facilities which along with production ensures feeling of prosperity in the family.
Justice Preservation leads to Fearlessness and Co-existence
(respectively)
Ensuring justice in relationship, or mutual fulfilment in relationship on the basis of values like
Trust, Respect, etc leads to fearlessness in society, while Suraksha of nature via enrichment,
protection and right utilization leads to co-existence in nature.
Production Work leads to Prosperity and Co-existence
Production and work are for physical facilities, and this leads to a feeling of prosperity in the
family. Production is done in harmony with nature, and hence, this also leads to co-existence with
nature.
Exchange Storage leads to Prosperity and Fearlessness
When we store and exchange for mutual fulfilment and not for exploitation, then it leads to
fearlessness (trust) in society.
Health self-regulation
In this dimension, we have made progress in terms of reducing infant death, increasing the life
expectancy through medication, removal of epidemics, implanting artificial parts in the body to support
the functioning of the body and so on.
These facilities are of course an asset. But as we learnt, sanyama is basic to svasthya. Lack of
understanding of the body as an instrument of the self (I) coupled with the technological progress has
led us to go for newer sources of sensual pleasures, irresponsible practices in living, etc. In place of
being responsible to the body, we are relying more on medication. We are developing micro- and nano-
23
technologies to cure smallest parts of the body, but we are producing new diseases day by day through
irresponsible living.
Justice Prevention
In terms of justice, we have progressed on account of bringing every act of crime to the court of
law. Every issue related to relationship can now be debated in the court of law. But is the court of law
the place to get justice? If we look at the situation today, we find that we have thousands of courts and
lawyers and they are all trying to settle injustice in relations. Judgments are passed and punishments are
given. This does not ensure justice. In justice, there is mutual fulfillment for both parties.
The fulfillment of relationship at the level of individual and family is deteriorating. TV serials
depict in great detail the bad state of our affairs and are creating large viewership for such things. At
the level of nations, we have rising fears of destructive wars with growing innovations in science and
technology. The competition and enmity between nations or communities is on the hike, the feeling of
mistrust and fear in villages and cities is slowly growing. The number of legal suits is increasing
exponentially, families are breaking for trivial gains, communal violence and conflicts between factions
of society are multiplying.
Regarding Suraksha, we can see from history how we humans have fared well in developing
new technologies which have high degree of utilization for the mankind. We have explored new
dimensions of science to get information about every corner of nature. But due to lack of
understanding, we have misused them more than rightly using. We can see that in terms of:
1. Enrichment: we have largely disturbed nature via chemicals and depletion of resources rather that
enrich it. Urgent steps are needed to rectify this trend.
2. Protection: the natural resources have been depleted to a large extent, birds and animals are fast
getting extinct, the forested areas are on the wane, pollution is on the rise, be it air pollution, water
pollution, soil pollution, plastic pollution, and so on. We have produced bombs to destroy the earth
multiple times, while destroying even once is not desirable.
3. Right utilization: again, we have fared very poorly. Today is an era of consumerism and wastage.
We produce many times more clothes, electronics, cars, watches, cell phones, etc. than we need.
Managing all this production has become a major problem for us today. All we are interested in is
having more and more of it (accumulation). Hence, instead of right utilization, we have ended up
exploiting and disposing off vast amounts of natural resources.
Production work
We have seen that nature is cyclic and enriching. How do we, as human beings, fare when it
comes to interacting with nature? On this account, we have done very well in terms of making our
production systems efficient and automated, reducing the time, material and energy requirement in
production, ability to produce variety of complicated parts and mechanisms, reducing the dependence
on natural processes, and so on.
But all of us know how we have multiplied the environment problems in the process and how
we have increased consumerism today. We have disturbed the ecological balance and our production
activities have upset the cycles in the nature. Let us take into account some more facts here:
Cyclic Acyclic: While natures processes are all cyclic (close ended) our processes are acyclic
(open ended). If nature functions in such a way that all resources are continuously renewed and
replenished (like water, manure in the soil, etc), mans process deplete them.
For example, when we burn coal, it is a non-renewable resource. We can never again
produce the coal we are burning today. This is what we mean when we say open ended. This is
true for all fossil fuels: petrol, diesel, coal. All these are being pulled out from the bottom of the
earth and being consumed by us. There are two problems with doing this:
24
The utility of all these fossil fuels at the bottom of the earth is to keep the temperature on the earths
surface in a steady state from the heat in its own core, and the heat from the sun. By depleting
fossil fuels, we are tampering with the ability of the earth to maintain its temperature. This is an
irreparable damage we are doing.
When we burn the fossil fuels in enormous quantities, it pollutes the atmosphere, and poisens the
air we breathe. And our basic need, to keep the body healthy, is affected.
We can take many such examples (plastic, foams, etc), where the production systems
designed by man, violate the cyclic principle inherent in nature thus causing an imbalance in nature.
This in turn effectively causes trouble for man himself.
Enriching-not enriching: Are we enriching nature, or are we not? Largely the answer is NO. Take
the example of pesticides and fertilizers. It is common knowledge today that the land that has seen
heavy use of chemical fertilizers becomes unfit for agriculture. And the pesticides are poisoning our
own bodies and the animals and birds as well. In the process of moving towards a global economy,
we have increased our technological capabilities and increased the production capacities of our
industries and factories. In this process, we have managed to make extinct thousands of plant,
animal and insect species. The statistics on this is quite terrifying. We seem to be hurtling towards
problems of great magnitude as we continue down the path of environment destruction.
Exchange Storage
In terms of exchange and storage, we have developed efficient ways of selling and buying,
sending or receiving money and investing them to multiply faster than nature could ever do. Sitting
with the laptop, we can purchase commodities across the world and invest our capital in distant
markets. Profits can multiply overnight, and we can enter the list of trillionaires without any physical
work. We can also store hoards of currency within a digital map.
But with these rising modes of exchange and storage, the exploitation of mankind and nature
has shot up. The disparities in which have increased, and the madness for profit has become the general
motivation.
Liquidity of money has of course helped us by providing a smooth mode of exchange. But it has
created more problems than solutions. These problems are the outcome of our mis-perception in
visualizing money which is a national entity to be the same as physical facilities which are tangible and
are our real needs. It needs to be remembered that money is not a need in itself but only a mechanism to
facilitate exchange of physical facilities.
Undivided society (Akhanda samaja) feeling of being related to every human being.
Universal Human Order (Sarvabhauma Vyavastha) feeling of being related to every unit
including human beings and other entities of nature.
25
Undivided society (akhand samaj)
An undivided human centric society is one of the higher human goals. Akhand samaj is the state
of the society where all people of different religion and thought process live together and work towards
betterment of the society.
Three activities can be performed to send the message of a holistic society:
1. Educating society through workshops, seminars and street plays: this is about organizing
workshops, seminars and street plays at various levels in society. The activity may be carried out by
N.G.O.s but must receive the support of government organizations. These activities can be
categorized into three types which include
Knowing the self,
Knowing the existence on basis of self,
Knowing the definite human conduct which is contribution of self in existence.
2. Value education in educational institutions: value education should be introduced in current
education system at all levels primary school, secondary school, senior secondary school as well
as college level.
3. Helping to apply values to the real world: organizations both government and non-government
should open up counseling centers which can help their employees or general public to apply values
to real life situations. It is about realizing the alternatives in life. Various individuals are on the way
of self-exploration, finding their natural acceptance towards holistic approach of life and realizing it
at all levels starting from self (with knowledge) to family (with meaningful relationships), then to
society (education health production business services). The idea is not to live in isolation or
individualism but with expansion of SELF to higher levels in the social system.
26