JKLW15 Questions:

1)
The Social Security program is a form of contribution. When one person is old or
disabled, the other people provide commericial energy to cover their loss of co
mmercial energy.
By the pledging of our birth certificates and all our economic energy to the ban
krupt corporate United States, we provide the credit for all their commercial a
ctivities. Suretyship is providing credit for another party. Indemnification is
suretyship.
The law of equitable concepts and unjust enrichment provide the basis for restit
ution and reimbursement.
I think I am a passive tortfeasor because I plan to collect funds from the joint
venture.
The corporate United States is the active tortfeasor (wrong doer) because it sip
hons off some of the funds for other parties.
Is this correct?
2)
We are entitled to restitution because we subrogated ourselves for AIG and our e
ntitled to collect damages from the party who caused the damages?
Wouldn't this make the corporate U.S., the Federal Reserve Banks and the IMF the
active tort feasors?
3)
In 1933, the international bankers reorganized the bankrupt corporate U.S. FDR h
ad sold more gold certificates than he had gold.
A trust fund was established, via the birth certificate, for each JOHN DOE. The
grantor is the living man, the trustee is the Federal Reserve private bank carte
l, and the beneficiary is the corporate U.S.
The birth certificates are sold to private investors. The living men and women p
rovide the credit to the corporate U.S.
These funds are used to run the corporate U.S. The private investor collect inco
me tax from each JOHN DOE as a return on their purchase of the birth certificate
s.
The Federal Reserve private banking cartel operates in their best interest for m
ore control and more bank ownership. The private banks and private corporations
operate under admiralty/maritime law.
We, the creditors, have to assert our rights and remedies under admiralty/mariti
me law per the Federal Rules of Civil Procedures.

principal dealer
obligee florida dmv
surety bonding company
florida dmv
makes a claims
principal must pay surety for claims
and claims
a surety bond is a guarantee of something
three parties
surety bonds are not insurance
but a form of credit
jwsuretybonds.info
surety bond irrevocable letter of credit
1-3%, no collatal, more liquidity

license and permit bond

doug is on
timestamp 0:05
[admiralty proceeding
http://admiralty.uslegal.com/process-and-pleading/
]
Topic: Indemnity and Contribution Under Maritme Law by Francis J. Gorman
indemnity and contribution
under maritime law
francis j. gorman
35 page treatise
indemnity is an extreme form of contribution
indemnification is the same thing as a surety contract
http://www.jwsuretybonds.com/info/videos/l1-what-are-surety-bonds.htm
http://www.massbar.org/publications/section-review/1999/summer/fundamentals-of-c
ontribution-and-indemnity
you are underwriting all these people's debt
you bailed out aig
in their indenture agreement
200 million dollars
common and preferred stock
you can redeem all the aig stock
in the dept of treasury
you have to assume responsibility
jean did have a cash buy order
to buy all their common and preferred stock
i am not making excuses
jean has found some stable people to work with
indemnity and contribution
almost identical
personal friend of jeans
Ref:Indemnity and Contribution
competant may agree to indemnify another
fica fed ins contributions act
paying into contributions
you are indemnifying
you can sue the united states
that's why i am not teaching openly
you are paying off the loss
removing gold and silver from circulation
1933
we are indemnifying them
so you are entitled to restitution
and reimbursement
indemnity is an all or nothing remedy
admiralty maritine remedy
that shifts entire loss from one tort feasor to another
if you have a ssn, you are a joint tortfeasor
state statutes
contributions amoung joint tort feasor
using this into a trust agreement

we are reimburse investor losses

because they have an investment contract
they are doing a forfeiture
you are not making payments
to an investor per pooling and security agreement to which you are not a party
Indemnity is an all-or-nothing remedy (admiralty) that shifts the entire loss fr
om one tortfeasor to another and thus, is 'an extreme form of contribution'. The
re are two bases for indemnity:
Contact - indemnity is grant where parites in a contractual relationship have ex
pressly agreed that one should indemnity the other
in civil and criminal cases
in the court room
you are under contract
express, implied contract,
written and operation of law
four types of contract
implies the existence in fact
birth certifcate
pignus, pledge or hypothecate
has security agreement with a pignus
[seems to mean pledge
http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/hypothecation)]
but the property remains with the creditor)
jean has done
release of irs leans by dooing this
provided good security agreement
timestamp 0:13
Restituion - indemnity is granted where the law (admiralty) bestows a right upon
one party to be indemnified by another. This kind of indemnity is also referred
to as "equitable indemit", "common law indemnity", "tort indemnity", "non-contr
actual indemnity" or "quasi-contractual indemnity".
Contribution is a doctrine whereby loss is distribted by requiring the tortfeaso
r to pay a portion of the loss to another. The contribution, or loss sharing, am
ong tortfeasors can be pro rate or according to degrees of fault. Law, not a co
ntractual agreement, is the source of a right to contribution. Like restitution
indemnity, it is based on equitable concepts and the avoidance of unjust enrichm
ent. The development of contribution the common law was impeded by the clash bet
ween the concept of resitution on one hand and the desirability of punishment o
f intentional or negligent wrongdoers on the other.

contribution
govt suffered loss
if you do an overt act that contributed
to an overt act that contributed
you can not collect
but this is what the us govt is doing
pro rata or to degree of fault
pro rated
criminal are tort feasors
you need to do a counterclaim
if you pay off the loss
1-5 misdemeanor
1-4 felony
[http://www.nccourts.org/Courts/CRS/Councils/spac/Documents/misdemeanorpunishmen
tchart.pdf
http://www.nccourts.org/Courts/CRS/Councils/spac/Documents/felonychart_12_01_95m
axchart.pdf
]
timestamp 0:15
prorata - degree of fault
you are indemnifying them
you pay off the loss
rule 13
mandatory counter claim
is an admiral/maritime law
criminal tort feasors
idemnity is defined as a collateral contract
or assurance
to insure against anticipated loss
we are indemnifying these people
risk management
jean
do one on the mortgage case and
they will not bother you again
indemnify - in damn no loss
not make loss
Dictionary of Word origin
contribution act of sharing of payment
of loss or payment
among cosureties
and reimbursing one of their member
who paid off the whole debt
or who suffer loss
the whole liability
pay to the order of
asking for reimbursement and restitution
this is a new claim in admiralty
you are suffering and loss
suffering loss
we paid the whole debt aig
which is underwriting all mortgages
subrogate us to aig
now we are entitled to reimbursement
contributions - origin of the word
tribulations
revelation 13 great contribution
indemnification
revelation con- with
tribute - to pay
a toll tax
pay a head tax, a tribute tax
head, capita, human cattle
caputa, we are human cattle
constantly harassesd by these people
until you start billing them
jean makes them pay be
when used me as human capital
virgil's georgies
romans ground out corn by a heavy roller
metaphor
trials and tribulations fo the early christians
the money assigned for tribe to pay
tribute
assigning a portion of your note
that you created as drawer or maker
and transferring to other people
as an assignedd
you are entitled but you are not bringing a claim
you can only grant contribution
or indemnification
as a third party claim
clusterfuck
intercourse
you are entitled
but you are not making a claim
con (together)
cluster fuck - called in inner court
no one else in the patriot movement teaching
email to all these article free
restatement of restitution Jean has got it:
distributing tort liabilities
admiralty is fair
but you have to know how to use it
timestamp 0:24

merryweather v. nixon decided in 1799 is generally regarded as the landmark Engl

ish case establishing the rule that there is no contribution among tortfeasors.
tortfeasor - a wrongdoer, an individual who does a wrongful act and injures anot
her who seeks relief
intentional wrongdoers.
'moiety' behalf of anything
Highwayman's case
two robbers, first thief sued
for keeping more than share
both robbers hanged
england, merryweather v. nixon not extended
american extended no contribution among negligent parties
then 'in pari delecti'
1799
there is no contribution among
intentional wrong doers
moitey means
Highwayman's case
american court's extended
no contributions among negligent contribution
prohibited contribution
ok for indemnification
they are active wrongdoers
you are passive wrongdoers
does james brown get down
is ass pork
does a bear shit in the woods

the total loss could be shifted

Uniform Contribution Among Tortfeasors Act

in 1938it's 781 cal civil code
kinds of indemnity (4)
express agreement (contract)
implied agreement (contract)
restitution indemnity
statutory indemnit
and two kinds of contributions
pro rata (prorated) by degrees
prorata - degree of fault
they are doing a tort feasor complaint
civil, not criminal,
they are bringing a claim for contribution
rule 13 mandatory counterclaim
arises from the same transaction
and you do not do the mandatory counter claim
because it arises from the same transaction
and occurence as the plaintiff's
anticipated loss or liability
(not suffered)
all insurance of
Indemnity by express agreement is straightforward. An express agreement
insurance
delivio versus boyd
delobio versus beloid or ('t')
download from westlaw
joseph story on admiralty
handed down land mark decision that they overturn
1938
swift versus tyson
said they had been misapplying
federal common law for last 150 years
not misapplied
general federal common law changed to federal common law (which is admiralty law
)
indemnity by express agreement is straigtforward. An express agreement to indemn
ify is a promise or an assurance by the indemnityor to compensate the indemnitee
for any anticipated loss or liability. Where the parties have agreed to an expr
ess indemnity provisions in a contract, whether written or oral, the legal issue
s typically involve contract interpretation or the enforcability of provisions a
s a matter of public policy (hjr 192). It is not against public policy to agree
to indemnify a person against his own negligence, but such intention must be exp
ressed in clear and unequivacoble terms.

enforcablity as a matter of public policy hjr 192 no contract clause to pay in a

specific type of coin or currency for contract
they are violating public policy
can not require a specific type of currency
with these mortgages
they are asking for payment
can't just file papers
have to understand or new shorts
appeal in mortgage case
supercedus bond
to indemnify the plaintiff against
anticipated loss
timestamp 0:38
with deeds of trust
and promisary note
you have an indemnified them
(there is an implied indemnification)
and you did not file a counterclaim
against them file a counter claim
indemnity agreement
for insurance and bonds
superceded bonds for plaintiff
to indemnify for antitpated loss
foreclosure

intended indemnity
go read the deed of trust
implied or expressed
confessed judgement
1132-1134 confessed judgement
is indemnification
the debtor has to sign notarized statement
with file at clerk
jerry1: how do we fight the implied indemnification on the Deed of Trust?
timestamp 0:39
intended liability
although not expressly implied
nonjudicial foreclosure
transfer all rights on property
abandonment occurs at closing
when you signed deed of trust
abandoned all rights, title, and interest
in the property
go ask for the 1099-A
the court is also supposed to fill out 1099-A
another point
there is 15407 of cal probate code
can't separte
trust is terminated
can not do a non-judicial foreclosure
who has the original deed of trust?
host: indenture trust
they sold the deed of trust
and the note
not foreclosing on the note
when they sold the tail (mortgage)
they sold the cow
we don't have the cow anymore
we are foreclosing on the cow tail
mortgage is terminated
when they foreclose on the deed of trust
they terminated the corpus of the deed of trust
timestamp 0:46
make them produce the original deed of trust
best evidence rule
challenge the authenticity of signature
people vs martin
cal supreme court (next week)
misrepresentation is forgery
2009

restitution indemnity
equitable consideration and unjust enrichment
we want this
Question:
got paid the insurance company,
paid by the investors
paid when they foreclosed on the house
with a suit in admiralty
comparison of
negligence of each tortfeasor
they cant collect from you
but you can collect from them
in pari delicto means on equal footing, fault
Question:
how can we prove they got paid by the insurance company and the investors?
host: call report
no
timestamp 0:50
fraud is a tortfeasor
they are active tortfeasor
contributed to you lost
they sold the trade receivables
they
1796 they put wall street together
scientists put wall street together

timestamp 0:51
forfeiture on the house
you indemnified them
and you didn't file a counter claim
under rule 13
now is the time to ask question
we will go over next week
timestamp 0:46
they sell both deed of trust and promisary note
forged thru misrepresentation
people go to the middle
you are not going to get this anywhere else
if not expressed, intended and implied
read the deed of trust
it is expressed indemnification
confessed judgement
1132, 1134 confessed judgement is
indemnification
1132 - borrower signs and notarized by attorney
how do we fight the implied indemnification of the Deed of trust?
suit in admiralty
intended means implied
non-judicial foreclosure
transfer all rights title and interest
to the lender
now read 1099-A 1099-C
waiver abandonment occurs at closing
you just abandoned all rights,
title and interest in the property
because us in declared state of bankruptcy
they need an underwriter
you are entitled to restitution
every foreclosure
timestamp 0:41
go ask them for the 1099-A
the court is supposed to do this to
when a court terminate interest in your property, they are supposed to give you
a valid deed of trust
no valid deed of trust
15407 cal probate code
when the sold the note,
they sold the mortgage
the trust was terminate
impossible to fulfill the trust
they can not do a non-judicial
foreclosure on your property
debt obligation - note
ask for the deed of trust
we don't have to bring the note
tail - mortgage, deed of trust
try to foreclose on the tail
cow can survive without the tail
(note) (mortgage
deed of trust)
sold the note, terminated the corpus
fo the deed of trust which is the mortgage
make them produce the original deed of trust
best evidence rule
challenge the authenticy of
people ver harken
cal supreme court
using misrepresentation
people ver. martinez
2009 cal supreme court
misrepresentation
who has the original deed of trust
shreded
to destroy the evidence
image them
document has been forged
maintained the signature through misrepresentation
3 indemnity - restitution
not contract, unjust enrichment
we are,
they got paid by insurance
they got paid by investors
and foreclosure 3x
all HUD loans are federal mortgage
federally guaranteed
adjustable rate,
sub prime mortgages
fannie mae
fed housing authority
they are active, you are passive
you can collect from them
because they are active
williston on contracts
in peri dilecton
on equal footing
in equal fault
no, they are not
they are in active fraud
active tortfeasor
they contributed to loss
by securitization
they took trade receivable
ask doug, they can predict
the month they loan will go in to default
1776
put wall street together
people like me
lunatic, moon cycle
potential field of the earth's grid fields
we are the injured person
we no counter claim
shit out of luck
no remedy
statute
law requires one to indemnify
have to indemnify us
us in a declared state of bankruptcy
we are the underwriter
we indemnify against anticapted loss
investors got paid by insurance company
file claim by insurance company
hud loans, fha, fed mortgage, fed guaranteed
type in loan number
all adjustable rate mortgage
go to fannie mae
go to wikipedia
fha, how they indemnify them
these people are getting paid
they are raping the american people
timestamp 0:55 firm
Procedureal features of an action for indemnity or contribution
In an indemnity or contribution action, the indemnitee usually must prove his ow
n liability to the injured person and the liability of the indemnitor to the ind
emnitee. The indemnity or contribution action is distinguishabel from the underl
ying claim of the injured person against one or more of the tortfeasors although
in modern practice, both claims are usually consolidated in one action by virtu
e of federal and state procedural rules. If the indemnitee and the indemnitor ar
e both sued as defendants by the injured party, then the indemnitee may file a c
ross claim for indemnity. If the indemnitor is not sued by the injured party, th
e indemitee may file and serve a third-party complaint against the indemitor.
indemnitor - person who indemnify, means to put you back to where you were befor
e the covered event occured
[me: deed of trust indemnifies the 'lender' against
indemnitee must show actual loss,
such as payment to the injured party
mortgage foreclosure
forfeiture
revenue
all revenue is taxation
(huntress case)
all revenue is of admiralty maritime law

all these mortgage foreclosure

forfeiture
revenue
all taxation of admiralty maritime law
all revenue of admiralty maritime law
timestamp 0:57 1:03 break1 firm
restitution is done under constructive trust in equity
no
In order to recover, one seeking indemnity or contribution must establish
starting here
The rules apply whether or not the injured party has brought suit against the pa
yor, and have been codified in the Restatement of the Law of Restitution.
see ref: 53
jean has

restitution
restatement of restitution
under constructive trust in equity
declaration of trust
make the judge an executor
makes you a qualified beneficiary
they have to put up a put up a bond to do
these foreclosures

an indemnifor indemnifies an indemnitee

an indemnitor who refused the opportunity to defend accepts some startling risk
under the uniform probate
3-605, 3-601
through
they have to put up a bond
except youappoint as special administrator
or you are a third party interested party
most other place uniform trust code
not cal, so jean uses their probate code

3-604, 3-605
put up the bond
exception
they had to put the bond of $100,000
on a criminal case
put up the bond or pay the claim
or paid the claim
uniform trust code adopted by most state
ca uniform probate code
american law institutie
single volume 1938 publication
150 pages of it talk about constructive trusts
all these courts are doing constructive trusts
in equity to give restitution or reimbursement to the plaintiff
because the defendant
intestate (dying without a legal will), no valid heir with no lawful heir or ben
eficiary
to the decedent's estate

Question:this
judge makes plaintiff the heir or beneficiary
constructive trust to give reimbursement to the beneficiary mortgage company
all capital letter name
has no heir
makes you the trustee
to give restitution to plaintiff
mortgage trust 407 406
can restate the trust
orally or in writing 407
2010 edition of uniform trust law
off of westlaw
jean download at 4am in the morning
500 pages from westlaw
if you dont bring a counterclaim
then you waive your recoupment
3-306, 3-305
of ucc
you have a propietary interest in the subject matter, in the transaction or occu
rrence
matter or the transaction
or plaintiff's occurence
timestamp 1:09 firm
want to get into the complaint
ryan indeminity in maritime
property damage
another article
francis gorman
lawyer and professor
go back up
1956 Ryan Stevadoring cov. Pan Atlantic Steamship
implied a warranty in stevedoring contract
(loading/unloading of a ship)
stevedore's breach of this warranty
in the deed of trust you have an implied warranty

because you put up the capital to fund the damn thing

is that a warranty
they destroy the notes at closing
shred the note so no evidence of what they have done

they shred the note

so no evidency of what they have done
timestamp 1:11
questionL all these law reviews
have to go into the complaint now
state of delaware
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INC.
non profit or religious
criminal cases
2711 Centerville road suite 400
Wilmington Delaware
19808
(302) 636-
timestamp 1:13
admiralty forfeitures
50 pages jean put together
adversarial complaint in bankruptcy
not tonight not enough time
now, third party complaint
criminal case in south carolina
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA INC
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
COLUMBIA DIVISION
plaintiff
THIRD -PARTY AMENDED COMPLAINT IN REM
FRCP 15 (a)(1)(2)
Supplemental RULE C(6)(a)(i)
JOSEPH BERNARD BRUNSON FRCP RULE 14 (a)(6)
TONY BERNARD POUGH CASE 00615-MBS
TIMOTHY MCQUEEN -00615-CRI, 2007-GS-47-
now reversed the roles
THIRD-PARTY PLAINIFF
vs
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA INC
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
NLETS The international justice and public safety network
1918 W Whispering wind drive
phoenix, arizone 85855
all police are a member
ALAS attorneys liability assurance society
Insurance/reinsurance ltd.
underwrite all court cases
carol saienni 725 market st wilmington del 1989
ceo of usa inc
privately owned
there is no public
public is bankrupt
so private came in
everything is private
pay water company to dump poison in water
unbelievable what is going on
international justice and
ALAS attorney liability assurance society
in bermuda
(underwrites , bermuda, no
carol saienni
725 market street
wilmington, del
privately owned
there is no public
private came in and took over the public
allegheny casualy company company naic 13285
go to treasury website
pub 750
have $1,625, 000 million underwriting
we are underwriting the surety company
williams, walter wilkins, us attorney
seymour, judge federal district court
law firm
COMPLAINT IN ADMIRALTY IN REM AND INPERSONAMr
indictment styeld 'True Bill'
contract, reinsurance, insuraner or under the Uniform Contributions among Tortfe
asors Act and
South Carolina
I. JUDICIAL POWER
1. District Court of the United States
under article iii and section 2

II. Original Jurisdiction

title 28 1333
admiralty, maritime and prize cases
III. Federal Admiralty Maritime Rules Governing This Complaint
Rule 9 Pleading Special Matters
to be sued
circumstances constituing fraud or mistake
(b) Fraud or Mistake
(c) Conditions Precedent
(d) Official Document or Act
(e) Judgement
(f) Time and Place
(g) Special Damages
(h) Admiralty or Maritime
(i) How Designated
timestamp 1:22 firm
asset forfeiture action
(here is foreclosure)
this is an admiralty maritime claim
came right our of rule 9
1966 merged frcp with admiralty rules
show us that next week
(2) Designation for Appeal
28 usc 1292 (a) (3)
92) 28 usc
rule 14 third party
defendants became third party complaintent
may be in rem,
supplemental rule c 6 a i
in the property arrested
forfeiture
they are arresting the property
it in rem procedure against the property
under supplementaly rule c 6 a i
(b) when a plaintiff may bring in a third party

we are bringing in a third party

which is the the original plaintiff
defendant are the third party plaintiff
originally they were plaintiff
now they are defendants

because we are bringing a claim

under contribution and indemnification and restitution
rule 9(h)
rule c 6 a i
we are bringing a third party
we are bring a counterclaim
claim in recoupment
mandatory
make the original plaintiff
the third party defendant
who may be wholly or partly liable
for remedy over, contribution or otherwise on account of the same transaction or
occurance, or series of transactions or occuraneces.
rule 13 for mortgage foreclosure
if mandatory, not

timestamp 1:27 firm

what does in rem (res pronouned race)
nobody reads
the third party plaintiff may demand judgment

rule 38 Right to a Jury Trial

(a) right reserved
(b) Demand
(c) Specifying Issues
(d) waiver Withdrawal
(e) admiralty and Maritime Claims
Rule 9 (a)
(1) Scope of Impleader
(2) Defending Against a Demand for Judgement for the Plaintiff
(c) Specifying Issues
(d) Waiver;Withdrawel
(e)
you
Rule 82: Jurisdiction and Venue Unaffected
not a civil action
28 usc 1391-1391
IV. THIRD PARTY PLAINTIFFs do not hot the true identities
V. GROUNDS FOR ASSERTING THIS CLAIM
verified statement Seized
rule C (6) (a) (i)
on June 6,2009 third-party plaintiffs signed corporate surety bonds of $380,000
as payments to the plaintiffs the US of A
That the purpose and intent of the Reinsurance Agreement for Miller Act Payment
Bonds SF274 is "(a) to guarantee and Indemnify the persons who have furnished or
supplied labor or material in the prosecution of the the work provided for in t
he contract referred to above [herinafter referred to as 'laborer's and material
men" the term 'materialmen' including persons having a direct contractual relati
on with a subcontractor but has no contractual relationship expressed or implied
with the contractor who has furnished 'the said payment bond] against loss unde
r payment bond to the etent of the "Amount of this Reinsurance" or for any sum l
ess than the "Amount of this Reinsurance" this is and unpaid by the Direct Writ
ing Company to the "Laborers and materialmens" on the payment bond
they are prosecuting you for laborers and materialmens
you put up the payment bond

to guarantee and indemnity sf274 prose

cution
under the miller reinsurance agreement
claim arises from the same transaction
on the deed of trust and the promisary note
'in rem' res race pronounced
give jean any criminal case
and jean will tell you who put up the bond
i want restitution
reinsurance agreement
anticipated loss
because of the acceleration clause
creating a high risk situation
and making you underwrite

third parties must defend under rule 12

rule 38 right to jury trial, demand
(a)
(b) serving the other parties
(2) rule 5 (d)
(d) waiver withdrawel

timestamp 1:31
V. GROUNDS FOR ASSERTING THIS CLAIM
signed corporate surety bonds as payment
Reinsurance Agreement for Miller Act payment Bonds SF274
prosecution word used only for criminal cases
under the Miller Reinsurance act
you put up the payment bond
went to treasury website
underwriting of $1 million
find out who put up the bond
file a counterclaim for anticipated losses
reinsurance lost
because of extremely high risk
anticipated a loss
b
ecause you are underwriting
give restitution and reimbursement
they know the date you will default
timestamp 1:35
1,626,000
Alleghency casualty comppany
naic 13285
they can trade internationally
you are underwriting
you are not getting paid
because you are not filing a claim
for restitution
certified reinsurer under the DOT
circular 570
for govt construction contracts
reinsurance agreements for miller act
read them
download from internet
basis of indemnity and contribution are contract and restitution
express agreement signed by the third party plaintiff between court and the plai
ntiffs
trust accounts
the court case number
indemnify the plaintiffs
to compensate
contracts and enforceablie
That the third party plaintiffs as Indemnators and Sureties are in subrogation t
o the PLAINTIFFthe UNITED STATES OF AMERICA INC., THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, a
s third party
entitled to contribution, reimbursement and restitution for assuming and carryin
g the liablities of Plaintiffs, sc and alleghency casualty company

275 reinsurance agreement

United States
the Virginia company
1601
by king james I
gave them a charter
to set up the virgina company,
that is the US
charter in 16
people in washington a bunch of pirates
no government in 200 years
on all mortgage backed securities, asset backed securities, cdo
collaterialized
cmo,notes, debentures, securities,
global international funds, Specialty Funds, sector funds,
Regional Funds, Socially Responsible Funds, Fidelity Funds and Index Funds for T
rust and all 401 and 801 K retirement funds that wyould
timestamp 1:44
Coup De Grace
suretyship is defined as a "lending of credit to aid a principal who has insuffi
cient credit of his own, and is a direct contract to pay the principal's debt or
perform his obligations in case of his default. [Philco Finance Corp. v Mehlam
254 S.C. 139, 139 S.E. 2nd 475 1964)].
we have a suretyship contract
we are giving them your credit
are you entitled to restitution?
http://bransdorfer.net/suretyship/miller-acts.html list of multiple lenders
http://bransdorfer.net/suretyship/construction-bond-FAQs.html
http://www.attny.com/gci32djd.html
express agreement between the court
trust accoun
indemnify the plaintiffs USA, state of colorado, allegheny casualty
law suit is a claim for restitution
third party plaintiff as Indemnators and sureties
for assuming the liabilites of the plaintiff, state of south carolina, underwrti
ng
274 payment
275
timestamp 1:41
UNited States
it's called
charter of the Virgina Company
1601 king james 1
people in washington are pirate
no govt in country in 200 years
abs asset backed securities, collaterilezed debt obligations,
mutual funds, sector fund, regional funds,
socially responsible fund, for trust account and all 401 and 801-K retirement fu
nds that judges have off shore
IRA that would otherwise belong th to debtor
this is the coup degrace
suretyship defined as lending of credit to aid a principal who has insufficient
credit
of his own and is a direct contract to pay the principal's debt or perform his o
bligations in case of default
we have a suretyship contract
under indemnification and contribution,
we are giving them your credit
you are entitled to amount and derivatives
30 year notes
30 years x payment
this is how much restitution and reimbursement
this is your responsibility
we are getting devine discipline for
lack of responsiblity
you have to start assuming responsibility
hosea 4:6
timestamp 1:46 firm
must have filed ucc=1 and sa
must put in contr
1-102 rights = remedy
remedy is counterclaim under contribution
for indemnification and subrogation
because you are assuming the liability
we are loaning them your credit
because they
bankrupt since 1933
timestamp 1:46
they hypothecated your birth certificate
under maritime contract
lend you credit
you are entitled to restitution
and reimbursement

if anyone says that

he is going to shut them
not into bankruptcy to fr
they went into receivership to the american people
proper formatting of the ucc-1
timestamp 1:46
will go adeed to ucc-1
pigna pledge or hypothecation
makes you a creditor in admiralty
a propietyar claim
but you are not doing anything
loss sheep of the house of israel
are doing nothing
we are going to start doing something

rule 14 a c 1
lending of credit to aid a principal
a lending of your credit under a suretyship contract
are you entitled to restitution and reimbursement
yes or no? yes
have to file a claim
allow them forfeit the property
because you did not make a counterclaim
this is a compulsory counterclaim
same transaction
because suit in admiralty
act
title 46 741-791
public vessels act
consented to be sued in rem and something else
allowing them to do this
frcp 13 (a)
state of colorado
titl3 46 741-749
suits in admiralty
us has consented
only way you consented to be sue
because they are operating under that
and they HAVE to
if you don't do it
you waive your remedy
timestamp 1:49
48 stat 1 chap 48 page 112
june 5, 1933 601 (h)
title 26
title 26
TEXT
i)That under 48 Stat. &s1 Chapter 48 Page 112 passed June 5, 1933 codified at ti
tle 31 section 5113 (d) (2) this claim is a prepaid CLAIM or ACCOUNT that is sub
ject to levy under &s 6332 (a) (2) (3) and 6324 (a) (2), and 6901 (h) of title 2
6 as a Tax on the THIRD PARTY DEFENDANTS as the Transferees'a and Qualified Heir
s to the DECEDENTS ESTATES, who have recieved and acquired property under title
26 &s 1014 of U.S.C.A.from the DECEDENTS and THEIR ESTATES, for the payment of t
axable terminations as Generation Skipping Transfers under &s &s2601 and 2603 of
title 26.
j) That the THIRD PARTY DEFENDANTS have seized Real, Persona, Tanbilbe, Intangil
be, Corporeal, and Incorpoeral Property belonging to the THIRD PARTY PLAINTIFFS
in the amount of $40,000,000.00 dollars of Lawful Money of the United States.
(everybody is waiving their remedies)
TEXT
h) That This is a Compulsory Counterclaim under F.R.C.P. 13 (a) due to the fact
that it arises out of the transaction or occurence that is the subject matter of
the opposing party's claims or the PLAINTIFFs the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA INC.
, THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA and the THIRD PARTY DEFENDANTS and does not requir
e for its adjudication the presence of third parties of whom the court cannot ac
quire jurisdiction.
i) That under 48 Stat &s 1 Chapter 48 Page 112 passed June 5, 1933, codified at
title 31
&s 3118 (d)(d) this claim is a prepaid CLAIM on ACCOUNT that is subject to levy
under &s 6332 (a) (2) (3) and 6324 (a)(2) and 6901 (h) of title 26 as a Tax on t
he THIRD PARTY DEFENDANTS as the Transferee's and Qualified Heirs to the DECEDEN
TS ESTATES, who have received and acquired property under title 26 &s 1014 of U.
S.C.A. from the DECEDENTS and THEIR ESTATES, for the payment of taxable terminat
ions as Generation Skipping Transfers under &s &s 2601 and 2603 of title 26.
[U.S.C.A. U.S. Code Annotated]
timestamp 1:49 break 2 firm
timestamp 1:54 break 2 firm

TEXT
j) That the THIRD PARTY DEFENDANTS have seized Real, Personal, Tangible, Intangi
ble, Corporeal, and Incorporeal Property belonging in the THIRD PARTY PLAINTIFFs
in the amount of $ 40,000,000.00 dollars of Lawful Money of the United States

Question:
[The federal estate tax has been repealed as part of a 10-year bill that steadil
y
increased the exclusion from the tax, and then repealed the tax in its tenth ye
ar.Currently, there is a $3.5 million exclusion from the estate tax.
The current rate of 45 per cent.
It is scheduled to increase to 55 per cent in 2011.
The tax cuts (income tax rates, capital gains tax rates, increased child tax cre
dit, eliminated marriage penalty, increased exclusion for estate tax) are set to
expire in 2011.
IRS Publication 950
Introduction to Estate and Gift Taxes
http://www.irs.gov/publications/p950/index.html
a lot of this stuff can be applied retroactively
upto 2009 and upto and part of 2010
repealed until 2010
publication 950
all mortgages prior to 2010
3million 500 thousand unified tax credit
and then they will reinact
repealed
going to reinact in 2011
Question:
why are they doing this?

third party defendants have sized Real, Personal, Tangile, in the amount of $40,
000,000 of Lawful Money of the United Sta
tes. this involved securities worth $40 million dollars
this is a forfeiture
Wherefore the THIRD PARTY PLAINTIFFS demand CONTRIBUTION, JUDGEMENT, RESTITUTION
and REIMBURSEMENT against the THIRD PARTY DEFENDANTS by the amount of the Corpo
rate Surety Bonds of $ 300,000.00 plus interest, the underwriting limitation of
$ 1,625,000.00 and any and all something or surpluses in excess of $ 1,625,000.
00 dollars.
THIRD PARTY PLAINTIFFS demand JUDGMENT, RESTITUTION, REIMBURSEMENT and CONTRIBUT
ION in the amount of $ 3,000,000,000,000.00 [One Trillion Dollars] Dollars of th
e Lawful Money of the United States of America on the Indemnity Bond and Agreeme
nt entered into and between the THIRD PARTY PLAINFIFFS and the THIRD PARTY DEFEN
DANTS on the 13th day of August, 2009 as refelected by the Court Record.
[trillion based on global derivatives -
accurate figure could prove within dollars
all courts have trading companies
US attornies executive offices under interpol]
CONTRIBUTION in the amount of $1 trillion
based on derivatives
for the corporate surety bonds
plus interest
you are underwriting the overage
this is an indictment
it took si months
amount of one trillion
based on cardinal six
global nine digit figure
all these court are trading companies
us attorneys executive offices
under interpol
TEXT
THIRD PARTY PLAINTIFFS demand return of all seized property Real, Personal, Tang
ible, Intangible, Corporeal, and Incorporeal belonging to the THIRD PARTY PLAINT
IFFS in the amount of $ 40,000,000.00 dollars of Lawful Money of the United Stat
es or REIMBURSEMENT, RESTITUTION or CONTRIBUTION from the THIRD PARTY DEFENDANTS
in the amount of $ 40,000,000.00 dollars of the Lawful Money of the United Stat
es.
THIRD PARTY PLAINTIFFS also demand a statement of accounting from the THIRD PART
Y DEFENDANTS under &s 9-210 of title of the South Carolina Uniform Commericial
Code. REQUEST FOR ACCOUNTING, REQUEST REGARDING LIST OF COLLATERAL OR STATEMENT
OF ACCOUNT (a) [Definitions] In this section: (1) "Request" means a record of a
type described in paragraph (2), (3), or (4). (2) "Request for an accounting" m
eans a record authenticated by a debtor requesting that the recipient provice an
accounting of the unpaid obligations secured by collateral and reasonably ident
ifying the transaction or relationship that is the subject of the request.
(3) "Request regarding a list of collateral" means a record authenticated by a d
ebtor requesting that the recipient approve or correct a list of what the debtor
believes to be the collaterol securing an obligation and reasonably identifying
the transaction or relationship that is the subject of the request. (4) "Reques
t regarding a statement of account"
timestamp 1:59 firm

demand a statement of accounting" means a record authenticated by a debtor reque

st that the recipient approve or correct a statement indicated by the debtor bel
ieves to be the aggregate amount of unpaid obligations secured by collateral as
of a specified date and reasonably identifying the transaction or relationship
that is the subject of the request.
THIRD PARTY PLAINTIFFS also demand that the THIRD PARTY DEFENDANTS file all 1099
OID
's, 1099R's, 1099A's, 1099C's, 1096's, 5495's, 5500's and 1040 Tax Returns and F
orms showing who the Payer's and Recipient's of the Capital and Interest on Trus
t Accounts cr-00615-MBS, 3:05-cr-00615- , and 2007 GS-47-4. That the THIRD PARTY
DEFENDANTS be ordered to provide the THIRD PARTY PLAINTIFFS with the name, addr
ess, and telephone numbers of the Warranted Contracting Office, The name, addre
ss and telephone number of the Contractor, the name address and telephone number
of the Sale Contractor(s) or Supplier(s) of Materialmen and laborer's on the Re
insurance Agreement for Miller Act Payment Bonds SF 274 and the name, address, a
nd telephone of the Financial Institution involved in this Case, the U.S. Govern
ment Contract Number, the Account Numbers, the Monetary amounts of the contracts
. That the Warranted Contracting Officer be ordered to file and sign an Optional
Form 90 [GSA-FAR (48CFR 53.223 (a) Release of Lien on Real Property or an Optio
nal Form 91 [GSA - FAR (48 CFR 53.223 (a) Release of Property from Escros. Tha
t all Bonds, Debentures, Proceeds, Funds, Monies, Accounts, Collateral, all Prop
erty, Personal Corporeal, Incorporeal, Tangible, Intangible and Security be rele
ased and returned back to the THIRD PARTY PLAINTIFFS. THIRD PARTY PLAINTFFS dema
nd release and return to them of all Bid Bonds SF 24, Performance Bonds SF 25, P
ayment Bonds SF 25A, Reinsurance Agreement for Miller Act Performance Bonds SF 2
73, Reinsurance Agreement for Miller Act Payment Bonds SF 274 and Reinstatment A
greement for Miller Act Bonds in favor the the United States SF 275 for settleme
nt and closure of Trust Account # 3:03-cr-0615-CR1, # 3:05-cr-00615-MBS and # 20
07-GS-47-4, and the payment of all Taxable Termination as generation-skipping tr
ansfers under &s 2601 and & 2603 (2) taxable termination. "In the case of a ta
xable termination or a direct skip from a trust, the
(page 15)
tax shall be paid by the trustee" of title 26 as set forth in the Business Trust
a part of the Court Record as EXHIBIT A.
THIRD PARTY PLAINTIFFS demand a Jury Trial under F.R.C.P. 38 (c) for those speci
fic issues THAT ARE TRIABLE TO A JURY.
JURAT.
some small writing
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF RICHLAND
got this notarized
and summons
You are hereby summoned and required to serve upon the THIRD PARTY PLAINTIFFs wh
ose Address is 3131 Bread River Road Ste 96 Columbia 29210 South Carolina Republ
ic
[all these banks are sucking of you]
ucc
9-210
in 2001 revision
included agriculatal liens
article 0
revision
can get a statement of accounting
listing of collateral or statement of account
timestamp 2:00 firm
1099 OID's, 1099R's, 1099A's, 1099C, 540
all these banks are sucking off you
UCC-11 requestor form to show clear title to the strawman account
showing who the Payer's and Recipient of the

Capital and Interest on Trust Account

all these banks are sucking off you
shanghai bank in nyc
timestamp 2:01 firm
sf 24 bid bond
sf 25 performance bond
sf 25a payment bonds
sf 273
sf 274
sf 275 a
a reinsurance agreement
for settlement and closure of trust accounts
in the case of a taxable termination
title 26
did a business trust
making them the beneficiaries
they have to give them restitution

this is how you do an in rem complaint

for contribution and indemnification
THIRD PARTY PLAINTIFF demand a jury trirtl
got it notarized
actual summons
you are hereby summoned and required
if serving us they have 60 day
they serve this on the judges
they arrest the judge
because they consented to be sued
you can not sue us govt
unless under suits and admiralty

If you fail to do so, ...

jean issued an arrest warrant
filed the complaint,
but did not serve it
they paid me, but not all, so i did not serve
filed with the court
in rem
complaint for contribution
and indemnification
timestamp 2:06

timestamp 2:06
click on
this is how you get restitution
us dept of housing and urban development
addendum A
FORFEITURE AND EXTENSION POLICY
are to close within 45 days
forfeiture of earnest money deposits
http://www.hudpemco.com/CB_addnA.pdf
Forfeiture of Earnest Money Deposits
from HUD website
admiralty maritime law for forfeiture
all this money in the escrow account
has been forfeited
they didn't close with the allowable time period
titl3 12 3754 and 3755
only sec of hud can foreclose
can delegate to a commissioner
have to pursue this
FORFEITURE
all admiralty and maritime law
Forfeiture of Earnest Money Deposits
sec of hud
only sec can foreclose on hud mortgage
he can delegate to a commission
they never answer
all this will come out
get somebody to pursue this
all this will come out
nothing hidden that shall not become manifest
become know
look at forfeit -in admiralty
50% of the earnest money
100% if fails to close other reasons
complete books of wills, estates, and trusts
alexanber bowls
The Complete Book of Wills, Estates & Trusts, Third Edition by Alexander A. Bove
.
refer to phil lilly
top gift and tax attorney
can not be settlement and closure
at closing
until agreement between trustees and benefiaryies as to what taxes are owed
on the capital transfer
never close
all this money is forfeited
because
nobody makes them
never an agreement as to what taxes are owed
so all this money is forfeiture
so they make you pay the tax
the capital transfer tax
on the taxable termination
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transfer_tax
terminate your interest in the property
look at the 1099 a instruction book
timestamp 2:12 firm
will come back to this
for form 1099-A and 1099-C
the lender is supposed to file
and give you a copy
Instructions for Forms 1099-A and 1099-C
lender is supposed to file this and give it
to you a copy
and they are doing it as a nominee
in your name
they are recording the amount that belong to
you with their tid
you as the owner
amounts that belong to you
you abandoned the funds
they are doing this as a nominee
in your name
Abandonment
An abandonment occurs when the objective facts
borrower intended to and has permanently discarded the property from use
instruction for 1099-A
you become aware or should have been abandoned.
this is why they are foreclosed
even if not behind on payments
if you expect to commence a foreclose
execution, within 3 months of the date you had reason
to know that the
on becaue you abandoned the property
with their tax id number
pub 1212 page 6
why? because you abandoned the funds

in deed of trust,
borrower here by grants, conveys, and transfers
if you are not mad there is something wrong with you
Reference
Statementsto Borrowers
If you are required to file Form 1099-A
you must provide a statement to the Borrower.
if you are required to file Form 1099-A
timestamp 2:16
jerry1: 1099-A making an acquistion
1099 OID
do a
or 1099-C debt cancellation
because they got paid at closing
they were paid at closing
is my loan securitized
http://stores.livinglies-store.com/-strse-32/IS-MY-LOAN-SECURITIZED%3F/Detail.bo
k
Abandonment
Question: Why were estate taxes repealed through 2009 and then to be reinacted i
n 2011?
estate taxes repealed until 2010
a lot of this stuff can be retroactive
pub 950
repealed in 2010
and reinacted in 2011
it took jean six months to put this complaint together
third party plaintiff demand one trillion dollars
cardinal is six digit
global is nine digit
courts are private trading company
owned by district attorneys
skype:jerry1: feedback to Jean - WOW!
they are supposed to file (lender)
they are doing it as a nominee for you
pub 1212 bottom of page 6
because you abandoned the damn funds
if you're not mad,
there is something wrong with you
abandonment
borrower - foreclosed on even when
not behind in their payments
because they abandoned their property
skype: jerry1:
what happens if we file a 1099-A on existing 'mortgage' then?
show it as an acquistion
file a 1099 oid
you abandoned, they acquired
1099 c
for debt cancellation
they got paid at closing
timestamp 2:19
box 1:
box 1: date of lenders knowledge of acquistion
or you abandoned
lender did acquistion
you did an abandonment
hereby transfer all rights, title and interest
you abandoned it
at the closing
confessed judgement unless you had knowledge
certified by attorney
Statements to Borrowers
(file 1099 OID and 1099-A acquisition
you abandoned the property
and they acquired
do a 1099c canceling the debt
Box 1: Date of Lender's Acquisiton or
Knowledge of Abandonment
lender: acquisition
you: abandonment
timestamp 2:17
skype: jerry1: if we are still paying on a mortgage over 3 years old can we stil
l file on 1099-C acquistion
who did that?
you did it.
are you responsible for what you do?
skype: host: Yes, but C is not an acquistion. it's a debt cancellation.
Who Must File?
financial institution, (bank)
credit union
fdic
resolution trust company
fed agency
military dept
court
Who Must File
300,000 forgiveness of indebtedness
they should file 1099-C
they must forgiveness of indebtedness
income to the person who has been forgiveness

$300,000 mortgage of forgiveness

they show that as income
get a bill for $5 million dollars
making $10 an hour
5. a federal governement including a department, a court
skype: it is a debt cancellation to the lender
skype: jerry 1: they were using your money - not theirs.
jean recorded it as income
now, the court has to pay a tax on it
can do a debt cancelation
cancel the debt at closing
go read 6109
penalty if they refuse to file
w-9
dept cancellation at closing
because you transfer
6109 penalty if they refused to file 1099
there is a penalty
payment to attorney fees
i reported this as income
as payment to the treasury
and not they have to pay the tax on it

charging you
all capital letter name is a corporation
pub 1212

jean deals with stuff on a daily basis

takes notes
study
do homework every night
since 8 years old

Guide to Original Issue Discount

p. 6
brought up this way
homework every night

timestamp 2:25 firm

if you are the holder of an OID debt instrument (1099-A) and you recieve a Form
1099 OID that shows your taxpayer identification number
because you owed the property at closing
abandoned
they showed you as the recipient
you become the recipient of the funds
you must file another 1099-OID
you become the recipient of the funds
so you must pay the tax on it
because you didn't claim it

Nominee.
you owned the property at closing.
show the owner of the debt instruments
it shows
you received the money
you have to pay the tax
p.2 Instructions of issuers of OID debt instruments
bond, debenture, cd
all these instruments that you are signing
1275 of title 26
note is publically offered debt interest
they monetize it
they are not reporting it
you abandoned it
they are collecting the tax from you
acting as an irs agent
because you abandoned it at closing
issuers of publically offered debt instruments
30 days after closing
file an 8281
30 days after closing
form 8281
Information Return for Publically Offered Original Issue Discount Instruements
30 days after closing
file an 8281
then go to form 8281
information return for publically offered
OID instruments
for publicaly
issuer name: me, address,,
ssn, tax payer id
cusip moved from fidelity
bloomberg investments
moved locators
issue date, maturity date is
30 years from the date of your mortgage
now you can get all the money on derivatives
30 x $2000 = $600,000
plus the value at issue or closing
add them together
you didn't claim it
abandoned
they are using it
nobody to blame but yourself
jean will assume responsiblity

checks, are publically offered debt instruments

banks are sold as publically offered debt instruments
ask banks 9-210
report these as publically offered debt instruments for a statement of accountin
g
can get money back
from your checking
and credit
banks sell your checks
as publically
9-210
ask for a statement of accounting
checks are unregistered securities
go to ucc
type of instrument
issue price is price at closing
then general instructions
yield to maturity - put the whole amount in
payments plus thirty years
jean has done this
you can get all this money back
they are using this
because you didn't claim it
abandoned property
they are using it because you didn't
claim it
go to ucc
8-102
timestamp 2:34 firm
security is either a certificated or uncertificated security

ownership interest, because you provided the instrument

scroll down to financial assets

security is a financial asset
which is money
timestamp 2:38 firm
they are monetizing these things
you are not reporting this

intangible means ownership

ucc locator
says that a security is a financial asset
which is money
they are monetizing these things
you are not reporting this
jean has 9 cpu
9 command units
8-102 definitions
downloaded 5000 files
a gaming computer
nine command units
8-102 definitions
(9)
a financil asset is a security
[http://law.onecle.com/new-york/uniform-commercial-code/UCC08-102_8-102.html]
[could not find at cornell law
]
[found it
http://www.law.cornell.edu/ucc/8/article8.htm
]
timestamp 2:38
8-102 (9)
ask for the CUSIP number for the security
a security is a financial asset
they are monetizing these things
and you are not reporting it
any property that is held by a securities intermediary
they have a securities account
it's in the pooling and servicing agreement
ask them for the cusip number
you are the issuer of the security
you have a right
to reimbursement and restitution
because you are the issuer of the security
all notes are securities
i think your ssn is a cusip number
case number is a cusip number
from fidelity website
all notes are presumed to be securities
ssn is a cusip number
guy on fidelity number
nobody reads anything
go to 10
8 defines an issuer
(10) the term 'security' means any notes
...
but shall not a note at the time of issuance
all these notes are securities
time 2:40
all notes are presumed to be securities
i think you ssn is a cusip number
guy on the fidelity web site
case number on search value
acted like a dumb guy
if come on too strong to people
they shut down
title 15 commerce and trade
chapter 2B securities exchange
78c definitions and application
go to 10
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/15/usc_sec_15_00000078---c000-.html
8 defines an 'issuer'
because you are signing an investment
contract
non-negotiable
3-106 (d)
read paragraph 8 and 10
the term security means any note
but shall not include currency or any note which has a maturity of not exceeding
nine months
all of these notes are securities
you are signing an investment contract
read adjustable rate ride
3-106 (d)
not exceeding nine months
security, signing an investment contract
non-negotiable
read
78c 8 and 10 of title 15
make all these notes securities
non-negotiable
know commercial law
unconditional promise or order
adjustable rate rider read
ucc
3-106 (a)
unconditional promise or order
it is a conditional order to pay
thus it is not negotiable
this is said on every note
that it relies on another paper
thus, it is non-negotiable
timestamp 2:44 firm
unconditional promise or order
unless promise or order governed
means it is a conditional promise to pay
thus it is not negotialbe
got to go
i love you
come back next week
thank you
[http://books.google.com/books?id=plh6HRaukKAC&pg=PA192&lpg=PA192&dq=bonds+requi
red+admiralty+claim&source=bl&ots=F_S53iiTOg&sig=UcGQ8QfvIU-UTC1YLEL_nW8AIJ0&hl=
en&ei=A6KeTMijDMP6lwejvsjsAg&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=2&ved=0CB0Q6AE
wAQ#v=onepage&q=bond&f=false
http://admiralty.uslegal.com/process-and-pleading/]
christian walters explains trusts
http://moorishcopyrights.blogspot.com/2010/03/christian-walters-explains-trust.h
tml

legal status in the united States of America

http://www.legalstatusrus.com/products.html

need to look at these forms from sam mesias

http://www.getnotice.info/lrh.html