Finite Element Study of Structural Discontinuities
Finite Element Study of Structural Discontinuities
Finite Element Study of Structural Discontinuities
Structural Discontinuities
Presentation Objectives
What is a Structural
Discontinuity?
Examples of Structural
Discontinuities
Concerns
Concerns
Concerns
Crack propagation
Possible Consequences
Solution Method
General technique
for constructing
approximate
solutions to
boundary value
problems
Boundary
Conditions
Load Type and
Directions
Mesh Refinement
Study of Mesh Refinement
EM 360, Fall 2002
11 Elements
1 Second
K=4.342
max
K= ____
4.52
4.5
4.48
4.46
Ktg
4.44
4.42
4.4
4.38
4.36
4.34
4.32
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
16000
Number of Elements
Mesh Convergence
Finite Element Study of Structural Discontinuities, 2003
18000
20000
Computation Time
25
20
15
10
0
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
16000
Number of Elements
18000
20000
Mesh Convergence
Previous Work
Model 1
Previous Work
Model 1 (continued)
5
4.5
4
Ktg = max /
3.5
3
Ktg
2.5
2
1.5
ABAQUS
Peterson
0.5
0
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
d/H
0.6
Previous Work
Model 2
Previous Work
Model 2 (continued)
3.5
Ktg = max / 1
2.5
Ktg
1.5
ABAQUS
0.5
Peterson
0
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
d/l
0.6
0.7
New Work
Reducing Stress
Concentrations from Holes
Method:
Add another hole to alleviate the stress
concentration.
Reducing Stress
Concentrations from Holes
Reducing Stress
Concentrations from Holes
Reducing Stress
Concentrations from Holes
Reducing Stress
Concentrations from Holes
Reducing Stress
Concentrations from Holes
Conclusion:
Adding holes in a plane perpendicular
to the loading direction does not
reduce the stress concentration factor.
Reducing Stress
Concentrations from Holes
Reducing Stress
Concentrations from Holes
Reducing Stress
Concentrations from Holes
Reducing Stress
Concentrations from Holes
3.1
2.9
2.7
SCF
2.5
2.3
2.1
1.9
1.7
1.5
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
R (in)
Reducing Stress
Concentrations from Holes
3.2
3
SCF
2.8
2.6
2.4
2.2
2
0
0.5
1.5
R (in)
2.5
Reducing Stress
Concentrations from Holes
2.9
2.7
SFC
2.5
2.3
2.1
1.9
1.7
1.5
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
R (in)
Reducing Stress
Concentrations from Holes
2.6
Optimal SFC
2.55
2.5
2.45
2.4
2.35
0
L (in)
Reducing Stress
Concentrations from Holes
Conclusion:
Adding holes in a plane parallel to the
loading direction does reduce the
stress concentration factor.
Cracks Handbook
Model 1
Model 2
Model 3
Crack Model 3
Crack Model 3
Center Cracked Plate with an Array of Holes Near the Crack Tip
2.8
2.7
K (psi-in
0.5
2.6
2.5
2.4
2.3
2.2
2.1
2
0
L (in)
Summary of Work
Completed This Semester