Comments On Design Report: A. STAAD Modelling
Comments On Design Report: A. STAAD Modelling
Comments On Design Report: A. STAAD Modelling
The report is not in order and following is the suggested recommendations at the preliminary stage.
A. STAAD Modelling
1.0 Deck Modelling
Step 1
Idealize the bridge into slab and beam elements (See figure 1)
Step 2
Calculate section properties (Area, J, Ixx, and Iyy) (Refer 2.0)
Step 3
Model the longitudinal beams and transverse beams as prismatic element with properties given in Step 2.
Step 4
Model the plate element.
Step 5
Mesh the plate element and give the mesh properties such that moving loads will fall on the mesh nodes.
Suppose the moving load increment is 0.1, than the mesh size also should be 0.1.
Step 6
Connect the mesh nodes using dummy beam elements. (Check for formation of duplicate beams) SeeFig1
Step 7
Apply permanent loads and variable loads other moving load in separate load cases in the bridge deck.
Provide the equivalent bending moment of braking load and vehicular wind load.
Amendment 2 IRC 6 2014 (Table 3.2 & Table 3.3) Pg. 44-45 & Pg. 46 respectively.
Step 8
Make a new load case with combining all the above loads using repeat command.
Step 9
Apply the moving load in the model such as that it should fall on the grid points.
Step 10
Apply wind load and earthquake load separately. (Refer 4.0 for the following)
Step 11
Apply the load combination as per IRC 6 2014 .Check Amendment 2 IRC 6 2014 (Table 3.2 & Table
3.3) Pg. 44-45 & Pg. 46 respectively.
Load Combinations are given in B.
Dummy
Cross Girders
Plate
Longitudinal Girder
beff 1
d1
d1
A1
Actual Section
d1
Idealized Section b 2
b2
b2
A2
d2
d2
d4
d4
A4
d4
b4
beff4
J1 3 b1 3 d13 / 10 b 1 2 d12
J 4 3 b 43 d 43 / 10 b 4 2 d 4 2
J 2 b2 d 23 / 3
Please follow the sample given below for the 1.35(D.L+S.I.D.L)+1.5(L.L. +Moving Load) +0.9
(W.L.)
1.35 D.L.
1.35 S.I.D.L
1.5 L.L.
0.9 W.L.
Load Case 8- 1.5 Auto Generated Moving Load +Predefined Load= Load Case 7
B. Load Combinations
Load
Com
binat
ion
Stren
gth
Crite
ria
Basic (ULS)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
Note
Blue stands for Permanent , Green stands for live load surcharge ,Red stands for leading
variable load , Violet stands for accompanying variable load
D.L. Dead Load S.I.D.L. Super Imposed Live Load
Prestress has to be added with every combination with factor of 1
Load Combination
Strength Criteria
Accidental (ULS)
Note
Blue stands for Permanent , Green stands for live load surcharge ,Red stands for leading
variable load
D.L. Dead Load S.I.D.L. Super Imposed Live Load
Prestress has to be added with every combination with factor of 1
Load Combination
Strength Criteria
Seismic (ULS)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
Note
Blue stands for Permanent , Green stands for live load surcharge ,Red stands for variable load
and seismic load
D.L. Dead Load S.I.D.L. Super Imposed Live Load
Prestress has to be added with every combination with factor of 1
Rare Combination
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Note
Blue stands for Permanent , Green stands for live load surcharge ,Red stands for variable load
and seismic load
Vehicle Load means Carriage Way Live Load, associated
load(braking,tractive and centrifugal)
D.L. Dead Load , S.I.D.L. Super Imposed Dead Load
Live Load Surcharge has to be added with every load case with factor of .80
Prestress has to be added with every combination with factor of 1
Frequent Combination
Note
Vehicle Load means Carriage Way Live Load, associated load(braking,tractive and centrifugal)
D.L. Dead Load , S.I.D.L. Super Imposed Dead Load
Blue stands for Permanent ,Red stands for leading variable load , Violet
stands for accompanying variable load
Prestress has to be added with every combination with factor of 1
Note
Vehicle Load means Carriage Way Live Load, associated load(braking,tractive and centrifugal)
D.L. Dead Load , S.I.D.L. Super Imposed Dead Load
Blue stands for Permanent ,Red stands for variable loads
Prestress has to be added with every combination with factor of 1
D. Overall Assessment
The design report contains only the design of substructure and also without any detailing.
Importantly, the design of superstructures is not included and without which design force
resultant of the substructures cannot be assessed. Therefore, our recommendation is to
follow the usual top-down approach. We suggest focusing on the detailed design of
superstructure with appropriate code compliance. Guidelines on modeling, analysis and
load combinations are detailed above for the convenience. Once, the super-structure
design and detailing is over, design force for the substructure can be estimated from the
superstructure and with additional computation. Substructures should be designed
complying the appropriate load combination for ULS and SLS.