Cable Spring Pulley
Cable Spring Pulley
Cable Spring Pulley
ME 202
Linear Spring - 1
Massless, like an ideal cable, but
12 kg
y
x
Linear Spring - 2
Compression
OR
F = k ( l l0 )
!"#
stretch
Pulleys
l0 =
F = k ( l0 l)
!"#
"free" length ( F = 0 )
contraction
Although none of these assumptions is exactly correct, each is approximately correct for many real systems.
Neglecting bending stiffness means assuming that the cable can change direction at a sharp corner, that is, a
corner with zero radius. This is more nearly correct for a piece of twine or string than it is for a wire cable.
But even the wire cable has much greater resistance to being stretched than is does to being bent. It follows
that neglecting bending stiffness is a good first approximation. Given that assumption, it can be shown that
the force in the cable must be parallel to the cable and that it can only be tension. (As the saying goes, You
cant push a rope.) The final assumption on this slide expresses that fact that wire cables stretch relatively little unless they are overloaded, which is being subjected to tension larger than that for which they are designed. In this class, we assume that cables are not overloaded.
To sketch the FBD, we must cut the traffic light away from everything to which it is attached. That means cutting the two cables. At every place we cut, we must consider the possibility of reactions, which may be
forces or moments.
With a FBD we should always include a coordinate system, because we will almost always need to resolve
forces into Cartesian components.
Because cables have no bending stiffness, they cannot exert moments on the light. And because the forces on
the cables are parallel to the cables and must be tensile, the FBD must be as shown. Note that the weight of
Page 1 of 3
the light is written as the product of its mass and the local gravitational constant. Had we been given the
lights weight, rather than its mass, it would be appropriate to write the weight as a single symbol or number.
Unlike an ideal cable, a linear spring is able to resist forces that are tensile, which tend to stretch the spring,
or forces that are compressive, which tend to shorten the spring. When it carries no force, a spring is neither
stretched nor compressed.
A linear spring is called linear because the relationship between the force carried by the spring and the
springs deformation is linear; each is proportional to the other.
It does not matter whether we assume that the force in a spring is tensile or compressive. (If we assume incorrectly, we will know soon because we will find a negative value for the force.) But once we have chosen between tension and compression, only one of the equations shown is correct. It is good practice always to assume tension or always to assume compression. That way, you need to remember only one equation and
there is little chance that you will write the wrong one. Most introductory texts (ours included) suggest that
tension is the better choice, simply because it appears more often than compression in such texts.
For a FBD of the block, we must cut the apparatus from which it is suspended. If we make the cut through
the spring, then we know that the force is vertical, since it must be parallel to the spring. The only other force
is the blocks weight. If we assume tension in the spring, Newtons third law tells us that the spring is pulling
up on the block.
To isolate point A, we must cut through all three springs. Each force is parallel to one of the springs. Then
assuming tension in all springs leads to the FBD shown.
As we did with the ideal cable and the ideal spring, we assume several things for the ideal pulley. A FBD of a
pulley will have three forces, one supporting the pulley at the central pin and two exerted by the two sides of
the cable that wraps around part of the pulley. The force at the pin has no moment about the pin because its
moment arm is zero. The moment arm of each of the other two forces is the radius of the pulley. One of
these two moments is clockwise and the other counterclockwise. Since they must cancel each other when
added, so that the sum of the moments is zero, the two forces must be the same.
It is not necessary to repeat the analysis described on the previous slide. We can immediately use the result
of that analysis to show that the tension is the same on both sides of the cable.
When we cut the cable above the block, we use Newtons third law to see that the tension pulling up on the
cable part below the cut is equal and opposite to the tension pulling down on the cable part above the cut.
Page 3 of 3