Lab Report
Lab Report
Lab Report
1.0 OBJECTIVE
To investigate the relationships between load, horizontal deflection and vertical deflection
for a curved davit, an angled davit, a semicircle structure and quarter-circle structure.
2.0 INTRODUCTION
Figure 1 shows the Curved Bars and Davits experiment. It consists of a back
plate, a pair of dial indicators arranged at 90, and one of four test structures. The two
indicators are on a magnetic base. We can move the base to any position on the back
plate. One of the indicators measures horizontal deflection, the other vertical deflection.
The four structures are a quarter circles, a semicircle, a curved davit and an angled davit.
Each structure has a boss fitted to the free end. This allows us to apply loads and measure
deflections in both the horizontal and vertical directions. Printed on the back plate of the
equipment is some useful information. Make a note of this - we will need it to analyze
our results after we have completed the experiment.
Figure 1
3.0 THEORY
MAKMAL PEPEJAL
We have seen that the elongation of a single truss member, when load is
applied, is usually quite insignificant. However, when the accumulative effect of
elongation in all members of a structure is taken into account, the displacements of
some parts of the structure are found to be appreciable. When a beam is subjected to
lateral loading, the deflection is usually much larger than for an axially loaded
member. We have an interest in beam deflection because the design of floor beams
is frequently controlled by the limit on deflection imposed by a code rather that by
the allowable stress. We must also understand beam deflection in order to solve
certain statically indeterminate problems that occur in beam design.
In engineering mechanics, deflection is a term that is use to describe the
degree to which a structural element is displaced under a load. The deflection of a
member under a load is directly related to the slope of the deflected shape of the
member under that load and can calculated by integrating the function that
mathematically describes the slope of the member under that load. Deflection can
be calculated by standard formula (will only give the deflection of common beam
configurations and load cases at discrete locations), or by methods such as virtual
work, direct integration, Castiglianos method, Macaulays method or the
Matrix stiffness method amongst others. An example of the use of deflection in
this context is in building construction. Architects and Engineers select materials for
various applications. The beams used for frame work are selected on the basis of
deflection, amongst other factors. The elastic deflection f and angle of deflection
(in radians) in the example image, a (weightless) cantilever beam, can be calculated
(at the free end) using:
fB
FL3
3EI
FL2
2 EI
Where,
MAKMAL PEPEJAL
MAKMAL PEPEJAL
4.0 EQUIPMENT
For student to investigate two common structures and two common davit structures
MAKMAL PEPEJAL
5.0 PROCEDURE
1. Referring to Figure 1, set up the equipment to test the semicircle first. Ensure you
have mounted the semicircle with a plate each side of the end, and you have
damped in securely.
2. Measure and record the breadth and, depth of the section checking several places
on the structure and taking an average.
3. Clip the weight hanger onto the two lugs on the loading boss. Gently pull down
on the weight hanger and note the direction the loading boss on structure moves.
4. Set the indicator positions so they contact the horizontally and vertically and have
the maximum amount of travel in each direction.
5. Carefully zero the indicators
6. Apply a mass of 100g to the hanger; tap the test frame to reduce the effects of
friction then take readings of both indicators.
7. Repeat with masses up to 500g in 100g increments tapping the test frame each
time.
8. From the measurements of the section calculate the second moment of area I
Enter all of your results and values into Table 1.
9. Remove the semicircle and attaching it to the side of the frame rather than the
bottom member, replace it with the quarter circle.
10. Ensure there are clamp plates each side of the structure and the indicator positions
give the amount of travel needed for the maximum loading.
11. Repeat the experiment. Similarly repeat the experiment for the curved davit and
the angle davit.
12. Enter all results into Table 1. Calculate the I value for each structure as the
manufacturing process may change the thickness and width of the material.
13. Plot graphs for each section, with load versus the horizontal and vertical
deflection. Calculate the gradient of each line in mm/N. Compare this to values
calculated form the standard formulae for each section or those calculated from
first principles
MAKMAL PEPEJAL
6.0 DATA
Breadth Breadth Breadth
1
2
3
(mm)
(mm)
(mm)
Semicircle
Deflection
Quarter
circle
Deflection
Curved
Davit
Deflection
Angle
Davit
Deflection
Average
depth
(mm)
19.20
19.20
19.20
19.20
3.50
3.50
3.50
3.50
19.20
19.20
19.20
19.20
3.50
3.50
3.50
3.50
19.19
19.10
19.20
19.16
3.15
3.10
3.00
3.08
19.00
19.00
19.00
19.00
3.20
3.50
3.30
3.33
Mass(g) Load(N)
0
100
200
300
400
500
Average
breadth
(mm)
0
0.98
1.96
2.94
3.92
4.90
I value (m4)
Semicircle
Deflection (mm)
V
H
0
0.82
1.73
2.87
4.09
5.46
0
0.48
2.01
3.45
4.91
6.78
6.86x10-11
Quarter circle
Deflection (mm)
V
H
0
0.63
1.37
2.21
2.45
3.38
0
0.49
1.03
1.60
1.76
2.40
6.86x10-11
Curved Davit
Deflection (mm)
V
H
0
0.24
0.55
0.98
1.22
1.74
0
0.35
0.56
1.52
1.89
2.74
4.6652x10-11
Angle Davit
Deflection (mm)
V
H
0
0.13
0.47
0.74
0.91
1.19
0
0.23
0.91
1.46
1.79
2.38
5.8466x10-11
MAKMAL PEPEJAL
7.0 CALCULATION
The following information as well as that printed on the back plate is:
type
radius
2PR3
PR3
R=150mm
EI
2EI
R=150mm
PR3
PR3
2EI
4EI
PRL (2R + L)
PR2 (4L+ R)
2EI
4EI
PL1L2(0.707L1+L2) + PL23
PL22 (3L1+L2)
Semicircle deflection
R=75mm
L
L=150mm
L2
R=105mm
L1=150mm
L1
L2=105mm
2EI
6EI
6EI
Semicircle deflection
MAKMAL PEPEJAL
R = 150mm
E 69GNm 2
b = 19.20mm
d = 3.50mm
I
bd 3
12
12
6.86 x10 11 m 4
V
P N
PR 3
2 EI
2 PR 3
EI
MAKMAL PEPEJAL
0.98
1.0976 x10
1.3975 x10
1.96
2.1952 x10
4.90
4.3904 x10 3 m
5.5900 x10 3 m
5.4880 x10 3 m
6.9876 x10 3 m
4.1925 x10
m
3
3.92
2.7950 x10
m
3
2.94
Quarter circle
MAKMAL PEPEJAL
R=150mm
b=18.20mm
d = 3.20mm
E 69x10 9
bd 3
12
12
6.86 x10
11
PR 3
4 EI
PR 3
2 EI
10
MAKMAL PEPEJAL
P N
0.5488 x10 3 m
0.3494 x10 3 m
0.98
1.96
1.0976 x10
1.6464 x10
2.1952 x10 3 m
1.3975 x10 3 m
2.7440 x10 3 m
1.7470 x10 3 m
Curved Davit
1.0481x10
4.90
3.92
0.6988 x10
2.94
Deflection
11
MAKMAL PEPEJAL
R = 75mm
L = 150mm
b=19.16mm
d = 3.08mm
E = 69 GNm-2
bd 3
12
12
4.6652 x10
PR 2
4 L R
4 EI
P N
11
PRL
2R L
2 EI
0.98
12
MAKMAL PEPEJAL
0.98 75 x10 3 2
0.2663 x10 3 m
1.96 75 x10 3 2
1.96
0.5326 x10 3 m
2.94 75 x10 3 2
2.94
0.7989 x10 3 m
3.92 75 x10 3 2
3.92
1.0652 x10 3 m
4.90 75 x10 3 2
4.90
1.3314 x10 3 m
0.5137 x10 3 m
1.0275 x10 3 m
1.5412 x10 3 m
2.0550 x10 3 m
2.5687 x10 3 m
13
MAKMAL PEPEJAL
L1 = 150mm
L2 = 105mm
b = 19.00mm
d = 3.33mm
E = 69 GNm-2
bd 3
12
12
5.8466 x10
P N
11
PL22
3L1 L2
6 EI
2 EI
6 EI
0.98
14
MAKMAL PEPEJAL
11
0.4506 x10 3 m
1.96
11
0.9013 x10 3 m
2.94
1.3519 x10 3 m
3.92
4.90
6 69 x10
5.8466 x10
3x150 x10 105 x10
9
11
1.8026 x10 3 m
4.90 0.15 0.105 0.707 0.15 0.105
2 69 x10 9 5.8466.x10 11
4.90 0.105 3
1.2387 x10 m
2.2532 x10 3 m
Difference ratio
Difference ratio = theory value experiment value x 100%
Theory value
15
MAKMAL PEPEJAL
Parts
P= 4.90N
V
Semicircle
deflection
Quarter
deflection
Curved Davit
deflection
Angle Davit
Deflection
5.4880 5.46
100%
5.4880
0.5%
2.7440 3.38
100%
2.7440
23.18%
1.3314 1.74
100%
1.3314
30.69%
1.2387 1.19
100%
1.2387
3.93%
6.9876 6.78
100%
6.9876
2.97%
1.7470 2.40
100%
1.7470
37.38%
2.5687 2.74
100%
2.5687
6.67%
2.2532 2.38
100%
2.2532
5.63%
9.0 OBSERVATION
16
MAKMAL PEPEJAL
From the experiments that have been done, we found that there was a deflection at
the horizontal and vertical axis. When the load had been applied to the structure; the
indicator gave a value for both of the axis.
The graph plotted is linear, when the more load applied to the structure using
hangers and mass, there are more deflection happened. From collected data, found that
there is a little bit different between theory and experiment. The most deflection was from
semicircle structure on the horizontal and the lowest deflections value came from quarter
circle structure.
Experiment value has a different from calculation value. The differences
percentage is 0.5% for the vertical axis and 2.97% for the horizontal axis for semicircle
deflection. For quarter circle deflection is 23.18% is for vertical axis and 37.38% for the
horizontal axis. Meanwhile for curved davit deflection for the vertical axis is 30.69% and
for horizontal axis is 6.67%. For the angle davit deflection, the result for differential
between calculation value and experiment value is 3.93% for vertical axis and 5.63% for
horizontal axis.
10. RECOMMENDATION
17
MAKMAL PEPEJAL
The valued from the experiment and calculation have a bit differences. This is because of
some error had happened when the experiment been done. This was happen because of
some rectification factor.
The factors are:
i)
ii)
iii)
It should be that the two digital deflection indicators is not really set at
90 to each other on the back-board
The experiment equipment place on the Jared table, and this influence
the reading of digital deflection indicators.
The experiment equipment not complete.
Solution:
i. It should have the gadget to make sure the indicator is set in 90.
ii.
iii.
11. CONCLUSION
18
MAKMAL PEPEJAL
12.0 REFERENCES
19
MAKMAL PEPEJAL
20
MAKMAL PEPEJAL